RISK RETENTION GROUPS 101

Similar documents
History: In order to solve the lack of availability and affordability of liability insurance

New Laws and Regulations in Washington, DC

NAIC POLICY STATEMENT ON FINANCIAL REGULATION STANDARDS

Model #785: 11/09/18 Draft Considered for Adoption by Reinsurance (E) Task Force Attachment Five

CREDIT FOR REINSURANCE MODEL LAW

APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION AS A RISK RETENTION GROUP

Reference Guide Captives Other Than Risk Retention Groups Updated as of September 2012

Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC Captive Insurance Update Issue No

Bureau of Captive and Financial Insurance Products

Preface to Credit for Reinsurance Models

Foreign RRG State Requirements/Issues. STATE CATEGORY AMOUNT DESCRIPTION NOTES ALABAMA Registration - Initial Fee 200

APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION AS A RISK RETENTION GROUP

Reference Guide. Captives. State of New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance. Office of Captive Insurance

Department of Insurance State of Arizona Captive Insurance Division Telephone: (602) Facsimile: (602)

Risk Purchasing Groups (RPGs) rarely make the news but

Captive Insurance Division" "

Self-Insuring Worker s Compensation through a Tennessee Captive

Uniform Certificate of Authority Application QUESTIONNAIRE

Substitute for SENATE BILL No. 155

December 15, Public Input on the Report to Congress on How to Modernize and Improve the System of Insurance Regulation in the United States

P1: PRE CONFERENCE SESSION: Introduction to Captive Insurance Monday, October 21, 2013, 3:00 pm to 5:00 pm

Single Parent Risk Retention Group

United States: Insurance & Reinsurance

Proposed Amendments: N.J.A.C. 11: through 26.6 and 26.9 through 26.14

Statutory Financial Statements. December 31, 2015 and With Independent Auditors Report

AN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY SESSION

AXIS PRO MISCELLANEOUS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY APPLICATION FOR STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS

Captive Governance: Cradle to Grave

PRIVILEGE UNDERWRITERS RECIPROCAL EXCHANGE

PENN TREATY NETWORK AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY AMERICAN NETWORK INSURANCE COMPANY FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

MEMORANDUM. Financial Regulation Standards and Accreditation (F) Committee. Julie Garber, Senior Manager Solvency Regulation. DATE: November 4, 2015

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 H 2 HOUSE BILL 156 Senate Health Care Committee Substitute Adopted 6/22/17

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AGENCIES. Division of Insurance

SOUTHERN GROUP INDEMNITY, INC.

CAPTIVE INSURANCE UPDATE 2011 Issue No. 1. New Democratic Administration,, Same Commitment to the Captive Insurance Industry

WESTERN SUMMIT LLC. Glossary

Ch. 161 QUALIFIED AND CERTIFIED REINSURERS CHAPTER 161. REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALIFIED AND CERTIFIED REINSURERS

Captive Insurance Company FAQs

Setting Loss Reserves What You Don t Know Can Hurt You

ACA HOME INSURANCE CORPORATION

BERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY THE INSURANCE CODE OF CONDUCT FEBRUARY 2010

NCIGF Recommendations to Deal with Large Deductible and PEO Insolvency Matters

Captives and the Management of Risk Table of Contents

IC Chapter 35. Business Transacted With Producer Controlled Property and Casualty Insurers

RULES OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INSURANCE DIVISION OF INSURANCE

Corporate Directors and Officers Liability, Employment Practices Liability and Fiduciary Liability

H.563. An act relating to captive insurance laws and accreditation standards. It is hereby enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont:

RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INSURANCE DIVISION OF INSURANCE CHAPTER CREDIT FOR REINSURANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. House Bill 2391

Ch. 85 VARIABLE ANNUITY CONTRACTS 31 CHAPTER 85. VARIABLE ANNUITY AND VARIABLE ACCUMULATION ANNUITY CONTRACTS GENERAL PROVISIONS

AUTO CLUB INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA

PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE LCB FILE NO. R188-18I. The following document is the initial draft regulation proposed

CHAPTER 18 - MULTIPLE EMPLOYER WELFARE ARRANGEMENTS

THE ANGUS FIRM, PLC CAPTIVE INSURANCE REPORT 2014 VOL. 1

Ch. 147 INSURERS FINANCIAL REPORT CHAPTER 147. ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

NEW YORK STATE INSURANCE DEPARTMENT 11 NYCRR 89 REGULATION NO. 118 AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Developing the Operational Strategy of Managing Medical Stop Loss in Your Captive

44 NJR 2(2) February 21, 2012 Filed January 26, Proposed New Rules: N.J.A.C. 11:2-28.7A through 28.7D, 28.13, 28.

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 1191

PROPERTY AND LIABILITY INSURANCE PRINCIPLES. Luthardt. Wiening 4 th edition

HEALTHCARE UNDERWRITERS GROUP OF FLORIDA

DRAFT SOUND COMMERCIAL PRACTICES GUIDELINE

FISCAL YEAR 2017 ANNUAL REPORT

PRIVILEGE UNDERWRITERS RECIPROCAL EXCHANGE

AUTO CLUB SOUTH INSURANCE COMPANY

A Bill Regular Session, 2017 SENATE BILL 247

VCIA 2013 App. vcia. To get QR Code Scanner, download one from the apps store on your device

NEW YORK STATE'S IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NONADMITTED AND REINSURANCE REFORM ACT (NRRA)

GULFSTREAM PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

TITLE 18. Insurance Code. Insurance

Maine Employers Mutual Insurance Company. Financial Statements (Statutory Basis) December 31, 2016 and 2015

State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION Division of Insurance 1511 Pontiac Avenue Cranston, RI 02920

Captives/RRGs 101-the Basics of Alternative Risk Transfer

Insurance Chapter ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE INSURANCE REGULATION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER CREDIT FOR REINSURANCE

COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE. Proposed International Insurer s Name: SUBMISSION CHECKLIST

Two Federal Bills Regulating Insurance and Reinsurance Are Proposed

Retaliation 2017/2018

REPORT ON EXAMINATION

NAIC IID International Insurers Department Plan of Operation

Maine Employers Mutual Insurance Company. MEMIC Indemnity Company. MEMIC Casualty Company

PROGRESSIVE EXPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY

OOIDA RISK RETENTION GROUP, INC. GOVERNANCE STANDARDS

Part I: Accreditation Standards and the Related Models

ORSA for Captives. Vermont Captive Insurance Association 2013 Annual Conference. Moderator: Sandy Bigglestone, Director of Captive Insurance, VT DFR

REPORT ON EXAMINATION CAPITAL ASSURANCE COMPANY, INC.

SPECIAL PURPOSE REINSURANCE VEHICLE MODEL ACT

CHAPTER 23 THIRD PARTY ADMINISTRATORS

Your Exam Content Outline

Captive 101. Presenter Names. Robert J. Schuhriemen Alliant Insurance Services, Inc

MAINE EMPLOYERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (STATUTORY BASIS) DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

BULLETIN. Number 11-B-07

Success Stories of Captive Utilization

The following definitions apply in Articles 1 through 13 of these regulations:

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL COMPANIES

US Options for Accelerated Closure of Legacy Liabilities

REGISTRATION AND REGULATION OF THIRD PARTY ADMINISTRATORS (TPAs) (An NAIC Guideline)

APPLICATION FOR: Requested Limit

Accreditation Program Manual SEG/IAR Form

Kush Bottles, Inc. A Nevada corporation (the Company )

Transcription:

RISK RETENTION GROUPS 101 CICA 2009 International Conference March 8, 2009 Robert Skip Myers, rhm@mmmlaw.com Karen Cutts, cutts@rrr.com Wendy Fisher, wfisher@2-10.com John Svoboda, jsvoboda@2-10.com

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) Enables organizations to band together to obtain liability insurance (excluding WC) Risk purchasing group Risk retention group

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) History Product Liability Risk Retention Act of 1981 (Public Law 97-45) Liability Risk Retention Act (Public Law 99-563; 15 U.S.C. 3901-3906 (1981, As Amended 1986)

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) The concept of Purchasing Groups and Risk Retention Groups: PURCHASING GROUPS (PGs): Groups of policyholders who purchase prescribed liability insurance from a commercial insurer or a Risk Retention Group RISK RETENTION GROUPS (RRGs): Group captives licensed in one state underwriting prescribed liability insurance

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) Both PGs and RRGs must comply with the following criteria: Membership must be homogenous Scope of insurance is limited to commercial liability but excluding workers compensation and property Any business, charity or public entity is eligible

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) State Regulation Risk Retention Groups: Only subject to those state provisions specified in the Act Purchasing Groups: Only exempt from those state provisions specified in the Act

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) Risk Retention Groups A RRG must be chartered in a state or the District of Columbia Except for the chartering state: A RRG is exempt from any state law, rule or regulation that would regulate or make a RRG unlawful, except that any state may require a RRG to: Comply with unfair claims settlement practices Pay applicable premium or surplus lines taxes Participate in a proportional insurance mechanism

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) Register for legal service Submit to financial examination if the chartering state has not initiated such an exam Comply with lawful orders for delinquency or dissolution proceedings Comply with deceptive, false or fraudulent regulatory act prohibition Comply with an injunction for hazardous financial condition Comply with a prescribed notice in 10 point type advising the insured of no guaranty fund coverage and preemption of many non-domiciliary state consumer protections

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) Ownership Interest in a Risk Retention Group All owners must be insureds and all insureds must be owners An association may own a RRG but all members of the association must be insureds of the RRG No control or ownership restrictions in the Act, other than insured/owner; owner/insured restrictions cited above NAIC action on ownership Transfer of stock or membership rights typically restricted/governed by RRG Bylaws and Subscription Agreements

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) RRGs require insured members to surrender their stock/ownership interest upon cancellation or non-renewal Payment for shares/ownership is often delayed 5 or more years to mitigate against capital crunch ; churning of market and/or to apply against member s contribution the member s proportionate responsibility for open claims and IBNR of the RRG

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) Risk Retention Group Structuring Choice of Stock, Mutual or Reciprocal form often predicated on control issues and ease of administration Reciprocal: An unincorporated entity operating through an Attorney-In-Fact, the members of which share in the reciprocal s profits and losses in proportion to insurance purchased by each member

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) Advantages of Reciprocal form: Tax benefits where policyholders are non-profits Lower capitalization requirements Ability of Attorney-In-Fact to exercise a high degree of control Potentially greater insulation from state and federal securities laws Assessment features often built into statute, if potential cash call of insureds is anticipated or desired

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) Risk Retention Group Capitalization Statutory Minimum Capital and Surplus Requirements vary by state Actual capitalization required will generally be a function of: The nature of the business to be written Reinsurance/excess insurance secured Actuarial projections/loss data

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) A portion of the capitalization can generally be secured by a Letter of Credit Typically a prospective insured of a RRG is required to purchase RRG stock or make a capital contribution (e.g., 1/3 of its first year projected insurance premium with the group) NAIC action

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) Advantages of Risk Retention Groups Facilitates Raising of Capital Except for anti-fraud provisions of federal securities laws, ownership in a RRG is exempt from federal securities or state blue sky laws Ease of Multi-state Operation Upon licensure in its state of domicile, a RRG can do business in all other states on the basis of an information filing

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) Form and rate review by non-domiciliary states is preempted Preemption from state guaranty fund assessments Preemption from non domiciliary state cancellation/non renewal restrictions

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) A RRG can generally sell directly to its members without requiring an agent or broker or alternatively the agent/broker for the RRG can secure a non resident agent s license in any state in which the RRG policyholder resides Long term service contracts between the RRG and Program Manager are typical, particularly in circumstances where Program Manager is advancing organizational costs. NAIC: not greater than five years

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) Risk Retention Group Formation and Operation Issues Defining liability insurance under the Act Defining similar or related risks under the Act Federal securities and state blue sky exemptions do not apply until the RRG is licensed in its state of domicile Qualification of non-domiciliary RRGs as authorized or admitted insurers under state financial responsibility requirements

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) Ability of a RRG to operate as a front Adding additional named insureds to the policy Frequent over-reaching by non-domiciliary states on: Registration filing requirements Imposition of registration and other fees Required use of agent or broker Definition of Liability

Risk Retention Groups 101 Karen Cutts, J.D., Managing Editor Risk Retention Reporter 2009 CICA International Conference March 8, 2009

Outline Introduction RRG Formations and Retirements - 1987-2008 Growth of RRG Premium -- 1988-2007 RRG Premium by Business Area of as year-end 2008 Leading RRG domiciles RRGs - Operating History RRGs Regulated as Captives vs. Traditional Insurers Challenges and Opportunities Conclusion

RRG Formations -- 1987 to 2008

RRG Formations & Retirements -- 1999 to 2008

Growth of RRG Premium -- 1988 to 2007

RRG Premium by Business Areas for 2007

Leading RRG Domiciles (as of December 2008)

All RRGs - Operating History -- 1987 to 2009 (as of January 2009)

Comparison of RRG insolvencies (1987-2008) based on type of regulation (captive vs. traditional insurer)

Conclusion Will RRGs Will Continue to Serve as Viable ARTs Mechanisms? From a market perspective? From a regulatory perspective?

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) Feasibility Process Define Business and Financial Objectives Forecast Ultimate Retained Loss Costs Develop Program Structure and Business Plan Identify Capitalization Requirements and Sources Cash/LOC Develop Financial Forecasts expected and adverse Compare and Contrast Domiciles Visit Domicile Regulators

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) Application Process The application must include the following documentation: Explanation of insureds/owners and their purpose for forming the RRG Actuarial feasibility study including description of information used, loss history of insureds is preferable but not required, methodology and conclusions on pricing Business plan incorporating the actuarial feasibility study Proforma financial statements expected and adverse Draft agreements with business partners, i.e. reinsurers, managers, claims administrator, actuary, auditors, etc.

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) Application Process (cont d) Identification of Directors and Officers Biographical affidavits for each officer and director Bylaws and Articles of Incorporation Disclosure documents including a draft offering memorandum and subscription agreements Underwriting guidelines and procedures Draft policy to be issued Explanation and/or sample procedure manuals for loss control and safety programs Identification of committees and participants, i.e. underwriting, claims, finance, investment Draft investment policy if available

RRG Structure

Keys to Successful RRG s Sense of urgency problem to solve Good spread of risk Understanding of loss volatility and the need for prudent funding Members trust and risk sharing approaches Long-term commitment - discipline to stay the course through markets cycles Strong business partners manager, claims service, actuary, banking and investment Understanding the benefit being provided by the RRG

RRG: Pro Adds stability Availability of coverages Premium pricing fluctuations Enables customization of coverages Delivery mechanism for loss control programs Ability to write directly, i.e., no Front needed

RRG: Con Capital Commitment Regulatory challenges by states Liability insurance only

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) Purchasing Groups Unlike RRGs, PGs are groups of insurance buyers who: Retain no risk Purchase liability insurance from admitted or surplus lines insurers State preemptions are limited to prohibitions against: Establishment of a PG Limitations imposed by state fictitious group laws Requirements imposed by state countersignature laws

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) Discrimination against a PG or any of its members Discrimination against nonresident agents PGs need not be incorporated, but generally are, often under state notfor-profit corporation status More than one insurance carrier may insure a PG

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) State Regulation of Purchasing Groups States have wider latitude under the Act as to information required for PG registration A state may require that the PG insurer be admitted or an eligible surplus lines insurer in the state A state may impose its surplus lines laws on a PG transaction involving an eligible surplus lines insurer The premium tax rate applicable to PG depends upon the status of its insurer as either an admitted or surplus lines carrier in the state of the policyholder A state may require form and rate review of coverage offered by a PG insurer

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) Purchasing Group Advantages Ease of formation Lower cost of formation and operation Preemption of state fictitious groups underwriting prohibitions Preemption of state countersignature requirements Availability of nonresident surplus lines licenses for PG producers

Federal Liability Risk Retention Act ( LRRA ) Purchasing Group Disadvantages Unlike a RRG, a PG is largely subject to regulation in each state, including form and rate review (although some states defer to regulation of the domiciliary state) The PG s ability to provide coverage is dependent upon its insurer s status on a multi-state basis Need for multi-state agent/broker licenses

Risk Purchasing Group (Liability Only) Association [Optional] Master Policy Insurance Co. Ins. Certs. Purchase insurance for members $ Members Risk Purchasing Group

Risk Purchasing Groups: Pro Same as Association-endorsed programs Benefits of group buying power Regulatory advantages over Association-endorsed plan Policy can be specifically tailored to group needs Avoid anti-group laws Opportunity to ease transition to a RRG in future Requirement to register in each state and related rules Liability insurance only

Risk Purchasing Groups: Con Requirement to register in each state and related rules Liability insurance only

Regulatory Perspectives Who regulates RRGs? Why are regulators interested in RRGs? What is the difference between regulating a RRG captive and other captives? How are RRGs regulated?

Who Regulates RRGs? Home versus Host Regulator Home Regulator: Is the insurance supervisory authority of the chartering jurisdiction of the RRG Host Regulator: Is the insurance supervisory authority of the jurisdiction where the RRG member/insured or its risk is located

Why are Regulators interested in RRGs? Home Regulator: Has primary/exclusive responsibility for overseeing formation, multi-state operations and financial solvency Host Regulator May implement limited requirements Is oftentimes the first to receive inquiries and complaints from local consumers, competitors, claimants, and other constituents

Why are Regulators interested in RRGs? Notable failures of several large RRGs in recent years LRRA preemption of state insurance laws resulted in widely varying state standards and limited host regulator confidence in the system Captive RRGs are not subject to uniform, baseline standards like those set forth in the NAIC s financial accreditation program for traditional multi-state insurers

GAO Report Conducted between November 2003 through July 2005 Final report issued in August 15, 2005 GAO-05-536 http://www.gao.gov/n ew.items/d05536.pdf

What is the difference between regulating a RRG captive and other captives? Frequency and volume of transactions Unaffiliated members/insureds in multiple states Multiple service providers and vendors Potential conflicts of interest Cooperation between Home and Host Insurance Supervisors Compliance with NAIC Accreditation standards

NAIC Financial Regulation Standards and Accreditation Program Provide a process whereby solvency regulation of multi-state insurers can be enhanced and adequately monitored Three primary areas of focus: Laws and Regulations (Part A) Regulatory Practices and Procedures (Part B) Organizational and Personnel Practices (Part C)

How are RRGs regulated? Formation Application review and evaluation Implementation Organization, capitalization, licensure, registration Ongoing requirements Interim and annual filings Financial and operational surveillance and monitoring

Risk Retention Group Operations: Management Self-managed vs. management by captive manager; other service providers Accounting/financial reporting Premium taxes/other regulatory Underwriting Risk management; claims Actuarial Reinsurance Investments Legal

Risk Retention Group Operations: Regulatory Compliance Business plan changes; other filings Rate/form filings Non-domiciliary state filings/regulatory issues Maintaining good communication and relationships with regulators

Risk Retention Group Operations: Governance NAIC Governance Standards for Risk Retention Groups Audit committee Board and shareholder meetings

Risk Retention Group Operations: Control Control by members/insureds/owners Internal controls Conflict of interest/code of ethics policy

For Further Information, Please Contact: Robert Skip Myers, rhm@mmmlaw.com Karen Cutts, cutts@rrr.com Wendy Fisher, wfisher@2-10.com John Svoboda, jsvoboda@2-10.com