DISTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT AS PASSED BY THE SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE

Similar documents
DISTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT AS PASSED BY THE SENATE

DISTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE CONFERENCE AGREEMENT FOR THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT

DISTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT AS PASSED BY THE HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE

PRELIMINARY DISTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT

WINNERS AND LOSERS AFTER PAYING FOR THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT

REFORMING CHARITABLE TAX INCENTIVES: ASSESSING EVIDENCE AND POLICY OPTIONS

THE TAX REFORM TRADEOFF: ELIMINATING TAX EXPENDITURES, REDUCING RATES

UPDATED EFFECTS OF THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT ON REPRESENTATIVE FAMILIES

The Distribution of Federal Taxes, Jeffrey Rohaly

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE COST ESTIMATE. Reconciliation Recommendations of the Senate Committee on Finance

PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF THE FAMILY FAIRNESS AND OPPORTUNITY TAX REFORM ACT

The Debate over Expiring Tax Cuts: What about the Deficit? Adam Looney

The Debate over Expiring Tax Cuts: What about the Deficit? Adam Looney*

An Analysis of the 2004 House Tax Cuts. Leonard E. Burman 1 The Urban Institute and The Tax Policy Center. June 2004

Options to Limit the Benefit of Tax Expenditures for High-Income Households

Options to Fix the AMT

TCJA Individual Tax Provisions and the States

Senator Kerry s Tax Proposals. Leonard E. Burman and Jeffrey Rohaly 1 Revised July 23, 2004

Updated Tables for Using a VAT to Reform the Income Tax

Revised Senate Plan Would Raise Taxes on at Least 29% of Americans and Cause 19 States to Pay More Overall (State-by-State Figures in Appendix)

AN ANALYSIS OF TED CRUZ S TAX PLAN

OVERALL FEDERAL TAX BURDEN ON MOST FAMILIES AT LOWEST LEVELS SINCE AT LEAST Income Taxes for Median Family of Four at Lowest Level Since 1957

Taxes Primer September 27, 2013

I S S U E B R I E F PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE PPI PRESIDENT BUSH S TAX PLAN: IMPACTS ON AGE AND INCOME GROUPS

UPDATED OPTIONS TO REFORM THE DEDUCTION FOR HOME MORTGAGE INTEREST. Amanda Eng Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center May 7, 2014

Notes and Definitions Numbers in the text, tables, and figures may not add up to totals because of rounding. Dollar amounts are generally rounded to t

continue to average 0.2 percent of GDP from 2018 through 2028, CBO projects.

H.R. 1 A bill to provide for reconciliation pursuant to titles II and V of the Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2018

THE NATIONAL COMMISSION ON FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY AND REFORM. The Moment of Truth

U.S. Senate & House of Representatives Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Proposals Relevant to Charitable Donors. December 14, 2017

AN ANALYSIS OF GOVERNOR BUSH S TAX PLAN

THE TAX POLICY. BRIEFING BOOK A Citizens' Guide for the 2008 Election and Beyond

AN OPTION TO REFORM THE INCOME TAX TREATMENT OF FAMILIES AND WORK

Notes and Definitions Numbers in the text, tables, and figures may not add up to totals because of rounding. Dollar amounts are generally rounded to t

WikiLeaks Document Release

Revised November 21, 2008

Desperately Seeking Revenue

An Overview of Recent Tax Reform Proposals

Details and Analysis of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

SENATE TAX REFORM PROPOSAL INDIVIDUALS

CBO MEMORANDUM ESTIMATES OF FEDERAL TAX LIABILITIES FOR INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES BY INCOME CATEGORY AND FAMILY TYPE FOR 1995 AND 1999.

Preliminary Details and Analysis of the Senate s 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

FISCAL FACT No. 516 July, 2016 Director of Federal Projects Key Findings Embargoed

EFFECTS OF THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT: A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS

The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2018 to 2028

SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS OF THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT AS APPROVED BY THE SENATE DECEMBER 4, 2017 FEEDING AMERICA TAX AND FISCAL POLICY PRINCIPLES

Extension of Saving and Investment Incentives

SENATE TAX REFORM PROPOSAL INDIVIDUALS

Abuse of tax deductions for charitable donations of conservation lands are on the rise

2 TRENDS IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME BETWEEN 1979 AND 27 Summary Figure 1. Growth in Real After-Tax Income from 1979 to L

Our Tax System Revealed. Lee R. Nackman, Ph.D. October 24, 2018

NATIONAL SOCIETY OF TAX PROFESSIONALS TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT H.R.1 COMPARISON OF HOUSE AND SENATE BILLS AS OF DECEMBER 6, 2017

Tax Reform Options: Promoting Retirement Security. Testimony Submitted to United States Senate Committee on Finance. September 15, 2011

(See the accompanying two-sided fact sheet at

Repeal and Replace Obamacare Act: A proposal made by Trump during the campaign to fully repeal the ACA.

TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT. National Economic Council

TAX REFORM. Overview. Congressional Republican Timeline. Senate Finance Links. The U.S. House of Representatives. Joint Committee on Taxation

Taxes and Gimmicks. Antony Davies Duquesne University.

Federal Tax Cuts in the Bush, Obama, and Trump Years

ESTIMATED REVENUE EFFECTS OF THE "TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT," AS PASSED BY THE SENATE ON DECEMBER 2, Fiscal Years [Billions of Dollars]

HOW DO WE TAX THE INCOME OF ENTREPRENEURS?

CHARTS MAY 10, 2018 WASHINGTON, D.C.

SENATE TABLE OF CONTENTS

Key Elements of the U.S. Tax System

Expiring Tax Provisions

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: Mobility and Rewards Comparison of current US tax reform proposals December 4, 2017

New Analysis Finds GOP Tax Plan would Give Richest One Percent of CT Residents $125,380 More Per Year on Average than Obama s Approach

Fiscal Years [Billions of Dollars]

C H A P T E R 1 9 T H E E Q U I T Y I M P L I C A T I O N S O F T A X A T I O N : T A X I N C I D E N C E

Would the Senate Democrats proposed excise tax on highcost employer-paid health insurance benefits be progressive?

Preliminary Details and Analysis of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

U.S. Tax Reform: The Current State of Play

Effects of Limiting Charitable Deductions on Nonprofit Finances

2017 Tax Reform House and Senate Comparison

THE INDIVIDUAL ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX: HISTORICAL DATA

Dynamic Scoring of Tax Plans

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) Tax Reform for Individuals. PREPARED BY Gary L. Riedlinger, CPA,PFS and Yeo & Yeo s Tax Services Group

The Effects of the Candidates Tax Plans on Households at Different Income Levels: Examples

Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy 1311 L Street, N.W. Washington, D.C (202)

Tax Reform: Comparison of House, Senate and Conference Report Versions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (H.R. 1)

Comparison of the Coalition Federal Budget Income Tax Measures and the Labor Proposal

Notes Unless otherwise indicated, all years are federal fiscal years, which run from October 1 to September 30 and are designated by the calendar year

EVALUATING BROAD-BASED APPROACHES FOR LIMITING TAX EXPENDITURES

U.S. Tax Reform: The Current State of Play

Tax Reform Legislation Issues of Concern to ECFC Member and their Clients

Generational Outlook: The Federal Budget Now and in the Future THE CONCORD COALITION

TAX POLICY CENTER BRIEFING BOOK. Background. Q. What are tax expenditures and how are they structured?

Introduction The federal government runs a deficit when spending (mandatory, discretionary, and interest payments on the debt) is greater than revenue

Updated Long-Term Projections for Social Security

SPECIAL REPORT. IMPACT. At this time, the framework is just a proposal. No legislative. IMPACT. If a tax reform package moves in Congress under the

SPECIAL REPORT. IMPACT. Many of the changes to the Internal Revenue Code in the INDIVIDUALS

Government Affairs. The White Papers TAX REFORM.

The Congressional Budget Office s 2012 Long-Term Budget Outlook: An Analysis

CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE CBO. The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2013 to 2023

Comprehensive Tax Reform: Prospects and Challenges

DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF A CARBON TAX

CONGRESS JANUARY Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (H.R. 1)

Dynamic Analysis at CBO

Law and Economic Justice

The U.S. Tax Cut and Jobs Act

Transcription:

DISTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT AS PASSED BY THE SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE TPC Staff November 20, 2017 The Tax Policy Center has released distributional estimates of the Senate version of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act as passed by the Senate Finance Committee on November 16, 2017. We find the bill would reduce taxes on average for all income groups in both 2019 and 2025. In general, higher income households receive larger average tax cuts as a percent age of after-tax income, with the largest cuts as a share of income going to taxpayers in the 95 th to 99 th percentiles of the income distribution. On average in 2027, taxes would rise modestly for the lowest-income group, change little for middleincome groups, and decrease for higher-income groups. Compared to current law, 9 percent of taxpayers would pay more in 2019, 12 percent in 2025, and 50 percent in 2027. T he Senate Finance Committee Chairman s Mark of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, introduced on November 9, 2017, and passed by the Committee on November 16, 2017, would make major changes to the individual and corporate income taxes, estate and gift taxes, and certain federal excise taxes. 1 The bill would also repeal the Affordable Care Act s individual mandate, but the distributional estimates presented here do not include the effects of that provision. 2 The Tax Policy Center has released distributional estimates of this legislation. We find the following: Compared to current law, taxes would fall for all income groups on average in 2019, increasing overall average after-tax income by 1.7 percent. In general, tax cuts as a percentage of after-tax income would be 1 This analysis is based on the version of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act as ordered reported by the Senate Finance Committee on November 16, 2017. Descriptions of the bill as introduced and modified are available at JCX-51-17 and JCX-56R-17 on the Joint Committee on Taxation s website. 2 The effects of this provision are not included because only a small portion of the $318 billion change in the federal budget deficit over the 2018-2027 period is due to a change in tax receipts. A recent report from the Congressional Budget Office of the tax and non-tax effects of repealing the individual mandate is available at https://www.cbo.gov/publication/53300. TAX POLICY CENTER URBAN INSTITUTE & BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 1

larger for higher-income groups, with the largest cuts as a share of income going to taxpayers in the 95th to 99th percentiles of the income distribution. The pattern of s across income groups would be similar in 2025 (the last year before nearly all the individual provisions sunset) although the magnitude of average tax decreases would be slightly smaller for most income groups. In 2027, the overall tax reduction would be just 0.3 percent of after-tax income. On average, relative to current law, low-income taxpayers would experience a modest tax increase; middle-income taxpayers would see little change; and taxpayers in the top 1 percent would receive an average tax cut of 1.4 percent of after-tax income. Some taxpayers would pay more in taxes under the proposal in 2019 and 2025 about 9 percent of taxpayers in 2019 and 12 percent in 2025. In 2027, however, taxes would increase for 50 percent of taxpayers. DISTRIBUTIONAL EFFECTS The Senate bill would have different effects on the distribution of tax burdens in different years, so we present results for 2019, 2025, and 2027 (figure 1). 3 3 We do not show distributional results for 2018 because the combination of a broader corporate base in 2018 and no corporate rate cut until 2019 makes 2018 law unrepresentative of the effects of the proposal s corporate s on taxpayers. TAX POLICY CENTER URBAN INSTITUTE & BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 2

2019 In 2019, taxes would be reduced by almost $1,300 on average, increasing after-tax incomes 1.7 percent (table 1). Taxes would decline on average across all income groups. Taxpayers in the bottom quintile (those with income less than about $25,000) would see an average tax cut of $50, or 0.3 percent of after-tax income. Taxpayers in the middle income quintile (those with income between about $50,000 and $87,000) would receive an average tax cut of about $900, or 1.4 percent of after-tax income. Taxpayers in the 95 th to 99 th income percentiles (those with income between about $310,000 and $750,000) would benefit the most as a share of after-tax income, with an average tax cut of about $12,000 or 3.5 percent of after-tax income. Taxpayers in the top 1 percent of the income distribution (those with income more than $750,000) would receive an average cut of $34,000, or 2.2 percent of after-tax income. TABLE 1 Distribution of Federal Tax Change of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act By expanded cash income percentile, 2019 a Expanded cash income percentile b Percent change in after-tax income c Share of total federal (dollars) Change (% points) tax rate d Under the proposal Lowest quintile 0.3 1.0-50 -0.3 3.9 Second quintile 0.9 5.7-330 -0.9 8.0 Middle quintile 1.4 13.1-850 -1.2 12.7 Fourth quintile 1.4 18.4-1,430-1.2 16.2 Top quintile 2.2 63.2-5,740-1.6 24.2 All 1.7 100.0-1,260-1.3 18.7 80-90 1.5 12.6-2,230-1.2 19.0 90-95 1.5 8.5-3,130-1.2 21.0 95-99 3.5 24.5-11,610-2.6 22.9 Top 1 percent 2.2 17.6-34,130-1.4 31.7 Top 0.1 percent 1.2 4.5-85,640-0.8 33.3 Notes: Number of Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) taxpayers (millions): Baseline: 5.2; Proposal: 0. Itemizers (millions): Baseline: 48.6, Proposal: 10.3. (a) Calendar year. Baseline is current law. Proposal includes provisions contained in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act as passed by the Senate Finance Committee on 11/16/2017. Excludes the effects of repealing the Affordable Care Act's Individual Shared Responsibility Payment (i.e., "individual mandate"). (b) Percentiles include both filing and non-filing units but excludes those that are dependents of other. Tax units with negative adjusted gross income are excluded from their respective income class but are included in the totals. The income percentile classes used in this table are based on the income distribution for the entire population and contain an equal number of people, not. The breaks are (in 2017 dollars): 20% $25,400; 40% $49,600; 60% $87,400; 80% $150,100; 90% $217,800; 95% $308,200; 99% $746,100; 99.9% $3,587,300. For a description of expanded cash income, see http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxmodel/income.cfm (c) After-tax income is expanded cash income less: individual income tax net of refundable credits; corporate income tax; payroll taxes (Social Security and Medicare); estate tax; and excise taxes. (d) tax (includes individual and corporate income tax, payroll taxes for Social Security and Medicare, the estate tax, and excise taxes) as a percentage of average expanded cash income. TAX POLICY CENTER URBAN INSTITUTE & BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 3

2025 In 2025, the average tax cut would be $1,300, or 1.4 percent of after-tax income (table 2). The magnitude of the average tax cut as a share of after-tax income would be smaller in 2025 than in 2019 for most income groups, mainly because the tax system would be indexed to the slower-growing chain-weighted consumer price index and because certain business tax incentives expire after 2022. Taxpayers in the bottom quintile would see an average tax cut of $60, or 0.4 percent of after-tax income. Taxpayers in the middle income quintile would receive an average tax cut of almost $900, or 1.2 percent of after-tax income. Taxpayers in the 95 th to 99 th income percentiles would benefit the most as a share of after-tax income, with an average tax cut of $12,100, or 3.0 percent of after-tax income. Taxpayers in the top 1 percent of the income distribution would receive an average cut of about $44,000, or 2.1 percent of after-tax income. TABLE 2 Distribution of Federal Tax Change of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act By expanded cash income percentile, 2025 a Expanded cash income percentile b Percent change in after-tax income c Share of total federal (dollars) Change (% points) tax rate d Under the proposal Lowest quintile 0.4 1.3-60 -0.3 3.9 Second quintile 0.9 6.5-370 -0.8 7.9 Middle quintile 1.2 13.4-880 -1.0 12.8 Fourth quintile 1.1 16.8-1,330-0.9 16.1 Top quintile 1.8 63.7-5,920-1.3 24.7 All 1.4 100.0-1,290-1.1 18.9 80-90 1.0 10.0-1,800-0.8 19.0 90-95 1.1 6.9-2,610-0.8 21.1 95-99 3.0 24.8-12,120-2.3 23.2 Top 1 percent 2.1 22.0-43,560-1.4 31.9 Top 0.1 percent 1.3 6.2-121,060-0.8 33.0 Notes: Number of Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) taxpayers (millions): Baseline: 5.7; Proposal: 0. Itemizers (millions): Baseline: 54.9, Proposal: 14.6. (a) Calendar year. Baseline is current law. Proposal includes provisions contained in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act as passed by the Senate Finance Committee on 11/14/2017. Excludes the effects of repealing the Affordable Care Act's Individual Shared Responsibility Payment (i.e., "individual mandate"). (b) Percentiles include both filing and non-filing units but excludes those that are dependents of other. Tax units with negative adjusted gross income are excluded from their respective income class but are included in the totals. The income percentile classes used in this table are based on the income distribution for the entire population and contain an equal number of people, not. The breaks are (in 2017 dollars): 20% $27,300; 40% $53,400; 60% $91,700; 80% $153,800; 90% $224,400; 95% $308,900; 99% $837,800; 99.9% $4,704,600. For a description of expanded cash income, see http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxmodel/income.cfm (c) After-tax income is expanded cash income less: individual income tax net of refundable credits; corporate income tax; payroll taxes (Social Security and Medicare); estate tax; and excise taxes. (d) tax (includes individual and corporate income tax, payroll taxes for Social Security and Medicare, the estate tax, and excise taxes) as a percentage of average expanded cash income. TAX POLICY CENTER URBAN INSTITUTE & BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 4

2027 In 2027, the overall average tax cut would be about $300, or 0.3 percent of after-tax income (table 3), largely because almost all individual income tax provisions would sunset after 2025. On average, taxes would be little changed for taxpayers in the bottom 95 percent of the income distribution. Taxpayers in the bottom quintile of the income distribution would face an average tax increase of 0.1 percent of after-tax income; taxpayers in the middle income quintile would receive an average tax cut of 0.1 percent of after-tax incomes; and taxpayers in the 95 th to 99 th income percentiles would receive an average tax cut of 0.5 percent of after-tax income. Taxpayers in the top 1 percent of the income distribution would receive an average tax cut of 1.4 percent of after-tax income, accounting for 62 percent of the total benefit for that year. TABLE 3 Distribution of Federal Tax Change of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act By expanded cash income percentile, 2027 a Expanded cash income percentile b Percent change in after-tax income c Share of total federal (dollars) Change (% points) tax rate d Under the proposal Lowest quintile -0.1-1.0 10 0.1 4.4 Second quintile 0.0-0.3 * 0.0 8.9 Middle quintile 0.1 2.9-50 -0.1 13.8 Fourth quintile 0.1 7.2-150 -0.1 16.8 Top quintile 0.6 90.0-2,230-0.5 25.8 All 0.3 100.0-340 -0.3 19.9 80-90 0.2 7.1-340 -0.1 19.6 90-95 0.2 5.6-560 -0.2 21.7 95-99 0.5 15.5-2,010-0.4 25.2 Top 1 percent 1.4 61.8-32,510-0.9 32.5 Top 0.1 percent 2.0 39.8-208,060-1.3 32.5 Notes: Number of Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) taxpayers (millions): Baseline: 5.6; Proposal: 6.0. Itemizers (millions): Baseline: 56.8, Proposal: 57.4. * Non-zero value rounded to zero. (a) Calendar year. Baseline is current law. Proposal includes provisions contained in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act as passed by the Senate Finance Committee on 11/14/2017. Excludes the effects of repealing the Affordable Care Act's Individual Shared Responsibility Payment (i.e., "individual mandate"). (b) Percentiles include both filing and non-filing units but excludes those that are dependents of other. Tax units with negative adjusted gross income are excluded from their respective income class but are included in the totals. The income percentile classes used in this table are based on the income distribution for the entire population and contain an equal number of people, not. The breaks are (in 2017 dollars): 20% $28,100; 40% $54,700; 60% $93,200; 80% $154,900; 90% $225,400; 95% $304,600; 99% $912,100; 99.9% $5,088,900. For a description of expanded cash income, see http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxmodel/income.cfm (c) After-tax income is expanded cash income less: individual income tax net of refundable credits; corporate income tax; payroll taxes (Social Security and Medicare); estate tax; and excise taxes. (d) tax (includes individual and corporate income tax, payroll taxes for Social Security and Medicare, the estate tax, and excise taxes) as a percentage of average expanded cash income. TAX POLICY CENTER URBAN INSTITUTE & BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 5

WINNERS AND LOSERS The impact of the proposal on individual taxpayers differs depending on their income sources, demographic and family statuses, and other characteristics that affect eligibility for certain tax benefits. Our estimates of the number of taxpayers that would pay more tax or less tax than under current law exclude certain minor provisions (listed in tables 4, 5, and 6) for which it is difficult to assign the s to specific taxpayers. 4 Overall, the excluded provisions represent a net tax increase, so we are overestimating the number of taxpayers that would see a tax cut and underestimating the number of taxpayers that would see a tax increase. In 2019, 76 percent of taxpayers would receive a tax cut from the included provisions, averaging almost $2,000, and about 9 percent would face an average tax increase of about $2,700 (table 4). 5 In the bottom income quintile, 53 percent would receive a tax cut and 2 percent would face a tax increase. In the middle income quintile, 88 percent would receive a tax cut and 11 percent would face a tax increase. In the top 1 percent of the income distribution, 86 percent would receive a tax cut and 14 percent would face a tax increase. TABLE 4 Tax Units with a Tax Change from Major Provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act By expanded cash income percentile, 2019 a Expanded cash income percentile b With tax cut Tax units with tax cut or increase c tax cut With tax increase tax increase All Provisions Major Provisions included here Lowest quintile 52.8-110 1.5 840-50 -50 Second quintile 85.4-430 5.1 810-330 -330 Middle quintile 87.9-1,100 10.8 980-850 -860 Fourth quintile 83.6-2,020 16.0 1,490-1,430-1,450 Top quintile 83.7-8,060 16.2 6,080-5,740-5,760 All 76.3-1,970 8.5 2,680-1,260-1,270 80-90 82.1-3,180 17.7 1,840-2,230-2,280 90-95 79.6-4,540 20.4 2,000-3,130-3,210 95-99 92.9-12,980 7.1 5,120-11,610-11,690 Top 1 percent 86.0-54,540 14.0 98,290-34,130-33,190 Top 0.1 percent 70.5-257,250 29.5 342,070-85,640-80,310 Notes: Number of Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) taxpayers (millions): Baseline: 5.2; Proposal: 0. Itemizers (millions): Baseline: 48.6, Proposal: 10.3. (a) Calendar year. Baseline is current law. Proposal includes provisions contained in the modified Chairman's Mark as passed by the Senate Finance Committee on 11/14/2017. Excludes the effects of repealing the Affordable Care Act's Individual Shared Responsibility Payment (i.e., "individual mandate"). Due to data limitations, this table also excludes the following provisions: repeal of exclusion for employer-provided qualified moving expense reimbursements; repeal of deduction for moving expenses (other than members of the Armed Forces); simplified accounting for small business; limitation on deduction by employers of expenses on qualified transportation fringes; modification of limitation on excessive employee remuneration; 20 percent excise tax on excess tax-exempt organization executive compensation; repeal of advanced refunding bonds; tax gain on the sale of a partnership interest on look-thru basis; and Craft Beverage Modernization and Tax Reform. (b) Percentiles include both filing and non-filing units but excludes those that are dependents of other. Tax units with negative adjusted gross income are excluded from their respective income class but are included in the totals. The income percentile classes used in this table are based on the income distribution for the entire population and contain an equal number of people, not. The breaks are (in 2017 dollars): 20% $25,400; 40% $49,600; 60% $87,400; 80% $150,100; 90% $217,800; 95% $308,200; 99% $746,100; 99.9% $3,587,300. For a description of expanded cash income, see http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxmodel/income.cfm (c) Includes with a change in federal tax burden of $10 or more in absolute value. 4 We do include the average effect of these provisions by income group in tables 1-3, but their effects vary substantially within each group and we do not have the information necessary to assign the s to specific individuals or households. 5 The remaining 15 percent of taxpayers would see no material change in their tax burden. TAX POLICY CENTER URBAN INSTITUTE & BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 6

In 2025, 74 percent of taxpayers would experience a tax cut from the included provisions averaging almost $2,300, and 12 percent would face an average tax increase of almost $2,800 (table 5). In the bottom income quintile, 56 percent would receive a tax cut and 4 percent would face a tax increase. In the middle income quintile, 85 percent would receive a tax cut and 14 percent would face a tax increase. In the top 1 percent of the income distribution, 83 percent would receive a tax cut and 17 percent would face a tax increase. TABLE 5 Tax Units with a Tax Change from Major Provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act By expanded cash income percentile, 2025 a Expanded cash income percentile b With tax cut Tax units with tax cut or increase c tax cut With tax increase tax increase All Provisions Major Provisions included here Lowest quintile 55.8-150 4.4 400-60 -60 Second quintile 82.4-530 6.9 810-370 -380 Middle quintile 84.6-1,250 14.0 1,170-880 -890 Fourth quintile 78.8-2,230 20.9 1,850-1,330-1,370 Top quintile 76.3-9,940 23.5 6,070-5,920-6,160 All 74.1-2,250 12.2 2,750-1,290-1,330 80-90 72.5-3,390 27.3 2,170-1,800-1,870 90-95 71.3-4,780 28.4 2,400-2,610-2,730 95-99 91.4-14,200 8.6 6,910-12,120-12,380 Top 1 percent 83.1-77,190 16.9 106,590-43,560-46,200 Top 0.1 percent 70.7-360,430 29.2 417,090-121,060-132,970 Notes: Number of Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) taxpayers (millions): Baseline: 5.7; Proposal: 0. Itemizers (millions): Baseline: 54.9, Proposal: 14.6. (a) Calendar year. Baseline is current law. Proposal includes provisions contained in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act as passed by the Senate Finance Committee on 11/14/2017. Excludes the effects of repealing the Affordable Care Act's Individual Shared Responsibility Payment (i.e., "individual mandate"). Due to data limitations, this table also excludes the following provisions: repeal of exclusion for employer-provided qualified moving expense reimbursements; repeal of deduction for moving expenses (other than members of the Armed Forces); simplified accounting for small business; limitation on deduction by employers of expenses on qualified transportation fringes; modification of limitation on excessive employee remuneration; 20 percent excise tax on excess tax-exempt organization executive compensation; repeal of advanced refunding bonds; and tax gain on the sale of a partnership interest on look-thru basis. (b) Percentiles include both filing and non-filing units but excludes those that are dependents of other. Tax units with negative adjusted gross income are excluded from their respective income class but are included in the totals. The income percentile classes used in this table are based on the income distribution for the entire population and contain an equal number of people, not. The breaks are (in 2017 dollars): 20% $27,300; 40% $53,400; 60% $91,700; 80% $153,800; 90% $224,400; 95% $308,900; 99% $837,800; 99.9% $4,704,600. For a description of expanded cash income, see http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxmodel/income.cfm (c) Includes with a change in federal tax burden of $10 or more in absolute value. In 2027, 28 percent of taxpayers would experience a tax cut from the included provisions averaging about $1,600, and 50 percent would face an average tax increase of about $200 (table 6). In the bottom income quintile, 12 percent would receive a tax cut and 32 percent would face a tax increase. In the middle income quintile, 28 percent would receive a tax cut and 66 percent would face a tax increase. In the top 1 percent of the income distribution, 83 percent would receive a tax cut and 17 percent would face a tax increase. TAX POLICY CENTER URBAN INSTITUTE & BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 7

TABLE 6 Tax Units with a Tax Change from Major Provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act By expanded cash income percentile, 2027 a Expanded cash income percentile b With tax cut Tax units with tax cut or increase c tax cut With tax increase tax increase All Provisions Major Provisions included here Lowest quintile 11.8-130 32.4 80 10 10 Second quintile 24.7-310 56.0 130 * * Middle quintile 27.5-550 65.6 140-50 -60 Fourth quintile 38.2-720 58.9 170-150 -180 Top quintile 53.0-4,920 45.7 380-2,230-2,430 All 28.0-1,640 50.3 170-340 -380 80-90 44.3-1,210 54.0 280-340 -380 90-95 57.1-1,450 41.6 430-560 -640 95-99 63.9-3,850 35.4 690-2,010-2,220 Top 1 percent 83.0-42,410 16.8 980-32,510-35,010 Top 0.1 percent 98.1-223,970 1.8 1,510-208,060-219,720 Notes: Number of Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) taxpayers (millions): Baseline: 5.6; Proposal: 6.0. Itemizers (millions): Baseline: 56.8, Proposal: 57.4. * Non-zero value rounded to zero. (a) Calendar year. Baseline is current law. Proposal includes provisions contained in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act as passed by the Senate Finance Committee on 11/14/2017. Excludes the effects of repealing the Affordable Care Act's Individual Shared Responsibility Payment (i.e., "individual mandate"). Due to data limitations, this table also excludes the following provisions: repeal of exclusion for employer-provided qualified moving expense reimbursements; repeal of deduction for moving expenses (other than members of the Armed Forces); simplified accounting for small business; limitation on deduction by employers of expenses on qualified transportation fringes; modification of limitation on excessive employee remuneration; 20 percent excise tax on excess tax-exempt organization executive compensation; repeal of advanced refunding bonds; and tax gain on the sale of a partnership interest on look-thru basis. (b) Percentiles include both filing and non-filing units but excludes those that are dependents of other. Tax units with negative adjusted gross income are excluded from their respective income class but are included in the totals. The income percentile classes used in this table are based on the income distribution for the entire population and contain an equal number of people, not. The breaks are (in 2017 dollars): 20% $28,100; 40% $54,700; 60% $93,200; 80% $154,900; 90% $225,400; 95% $304,600; 99% $912,100; 99.9% $5,088,900. For a description of expanded cash income, see http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxmodel/income.cfm (c) Includes with a change in federal tax burden of $10 or more in absolute value. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, the Brookings Institution, their trustees, or their funders. The Tax Policy Center is a joint venture of the Urban Institute and Brookings Institution. For more information, visit taxpolicycenter.org or e-mail info@taxpolicycenter.org. Copyright November 2017 Tax Policy Center. All rights reserved. Permission is granted for reproduction of this file, with attribution to the Urban-Brooking s Tax Policy Center. TAX POLICY CENTER URBAN INSTITUTE & BROOKINGS INSTITUTIO N 8