Models of Wage-setting.. January 15, 2010

Similar documents
Introducing nominal rigidities.

Advanced Microeconomics

Simple e ciency-wage model

Real Wage Rigidities and Disin ation Dynamics: Calvo vs. Rotemberg Pricing

EconS Micro Theory I 1 Recitation #9 - Monopoly

Topic 7. Nominal rigidities

These notes essentially correspond to chapter 13 of the text.

Endogenous Markups in the New Keynesian Model: Implications for In ation-output Trade-O and Optimal Policy

2 Maximizing pro ts when marginal costs are increasing

International Trade Lecture 14: Firm Heterogeneity Theory (I) Melitz (2003)

Product Di erentiation. We have seen earlier how pure external IRS can lead to intra-industry trade.

Microeconomics, IB and IBP

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY Department of Economics. Ph. D. Comprehensive Examination: Macroeconomics Spring, 2013

Introducing nominal rigidities. A static model.

International Trade

Chapters 1 & 2 - MACROECONOMICS, THE DATA

EC202. Microeconomic Principles II. Summer 2009 examination. 2008/2009 syllabus

Microeconomics I - Midterm

Macroeconomics 2. Lecture 6 - New Keynesian Business Cycles March. Sciences Po

Monetary Policy: Rules versus discretion..

Answer: Let y 2 denote rm 2 s output of food and L 2 denote rm 2 s labor input (so

Lecture 2, November 16: A Classical Model (Galí, Chapter 2)

Introducing money. Olivier Blanchard. April Spring Topic 6.

Product Di erentiation: Exercises Part 1

Economic Growth and Development : Exam. Consider the model by Barro (1990). The production function takes the

Exercises Solutions: Oligopoly

EconS Firm Optimization

Supply-side effects of monetary policy and the central bank s objective function. Eurilton Araújo

1 Multiple Choice (30 points)

14.02 Principles of Macroeconomics Solutions to Problem Set # 2

Universidad Carlos III de Madrid May Microeconomics Grade

Chapters 1 & 2 - MACROECONOMICS, THE DATA

(b) per capita consumption grows at the rate of 2%.

U(x 1. ; x 2 ) = 4 ln x 1

1 Unemployment Insurance

Labour Supply. Lecture notes. Dan Anderberg Royal Holloway College January 2003

SOLUTION PROBLEM SET 3 LABOR ECONOMICS

EconS Micro Theory I 1 Recitation #7 - Competitive Markets

The Long-run Optimal Degree of Indexation in the New Keynesian Model

Money in OLG Models. Econ602, Spring The central question of monetary economics: Why and when is money valued in equilibrium?

1. If the consumer has income y then the budget constraint is. x + F (q) y. where is a variable taking the values 0 or 1, representing the cases not

Costs. Lecture 5. August Reading: Perlo Chapter 7 1 / 63

Week 8: Fiscal policy in the New Keynesian Model

Human capital and the ambiguity of the Mankiw-Romer-Weil model

TOBB-ETU, Economics Department Macroeconomics II (ECON 532) Practice Problems I (Solutions)

The role of asymmetric information

Problem Set (1 p) (1) 1 (100)

1. Cash-in-Advance models a. Basic model under certainty b. Extended model in stochastic case. recommended)

Interest rates expressed in terms of the national currency (basket of goods ) are called nominal (real) interest rates Their relation is given as

Problem Set 1 Answer Key. I. Short Problems 1. Check whether the following three functions represent the same underlying preferences

Macroeconomics. Basic New Keynesian Model. Nicola Viegi. April 29, 2014

SOLUTIONS PROBLEM SET 5

Lecture Notes 1: Solow Growth Model

Consumption-Savings Decisions and State Pricing

Universidad Carlos III de Madrid June Microeconomics Grade

Lecture 5. Varian, Ch. 8; MWG, Chs. 3.E, 3.G, and 3.H. 1 Summary of Lectures 1, 2, and 3: Production theory and duality

Fiscal policy: Ricardian Equivalence, the e ects of government spending, and debt dynamics

1 Non-traded goods and the real exchange rate

UCLA Department of Economics Ph. D. Preliminary Exam Micro-Economic Theory

EC202. Microeconomic Principles II. Summer 2011 Examination. 2010/2011 Syllabus ONLY

TOBB-ETU, Economics Department Macroeconomics II (ECON 532) Practice Problems III

International Trade Lecture 5: Increasing Returns to Scale and Monopolistic Competition

ECON Micro Foundations

Problem Set 3. Consider a closed economy inhabited by an in ntely lived representative agent who maximizes lifetime utility given by. t ln c t.

Real Exchange Rate and Terms of Trade Obstfeld and Rogo, Chapter 4

Credit Card Competition and Naive Hyperbolic Consumers

Economics 2450A: Public Economics Section 1-2: Uncompensated and Compensated Elasticities; Static and Dynamic Labor Supply

Fiscal Multiplier in a Credit-Constrained New Keynesian Economy

Department of Economics The Ohio State University Econ 805 Homework #3 Answers

Optimal Progressivity

Econ Review Set 3 - Answers

Fiscal policy and minimum wage for redistribution: an equivalence result. Abstract

Monetary Economics: Macro Aspects, 19/ Henrik Jensen Department of Economics University of Copenhagen

EconS Cost Functions

Reconciling the Effects of Monetary Policy Actions on Consumption within a Heterogeneous Agent Framework

International Trade Lecture 23: Trade Policy Theory (I)

14.02 Principles of Macroeconomics Fall 2009

Advanced International Macroeconomics Session 5

Department of Economics Shanghai University of Finance and Economics Intermediate Macroeconomics

Search, Welfare and the Hot Potato E ect of In ation

The ratio of consumption to income, called the average propensity to consume, falls as income rises

OPTIMAL INCENTIVES IN A PRINCIPAL-AGENT MODEL WITH ENDOGENOUS TECHNOLOGY. WP-EMS Working Papers Series in Economics, Mathematics and Statistics

These notes essentially correspond to chapter 7 of the text.

Problem Set I - Solution

Discussion of Chiu, Meh and Wright

Problem Set # Public Economics

Pharmaceutical Patenting in Developing Countries and R&D

2. Find the equilibrium price and quantity in this market.

Keynesian Multipliers with Home Production

5. COMPETITIVE MARKETS

Optimal Monetary Policy

BEE1024 Mathematics for Economists

Mean-Variance Analysis

Liquidity, Business Cycles, and Monetary Policy. Nobuhiro Kiyotaki and John Moore

Working Paper Series. This paper can be downloaded without charge from:

Lecture 7 - Locational equilibrium continued

Macroeconomics IV Problem Set 3 Solutions

E cient Minimum Wages

ECON 4325 Monetary Policy and Business Fluctuations

Perfect Competition Model: where does it apply in PICs

Transcription:

Models of Wage-setting.. Huw Dixon 200 Cardi January 5, 200

Models of Wage-setting. Importance of Unions in wage-bargaining: more important in EU than US. Several Models. In a unionised labour market, are likely to get "Involuntary Unemployment" Involuntary Unemployment Union sets wage above MRS consumption leisure. Acts just like monopolist: restricts labour supply to raise wage above competitive level.

. Types of Wage setting models. The main features How wages and employment are chosen. The mobility of labour how many unions per rm. Employment: in most models, it is assumed that the rm chooses employment given the wage. This is the "right to manage" (RTM) model. It means that employment is determined by the labour demand curve of the rm:

The labour demand equation equates the marginal revenue product of labour to the nominal wage: MRP = W P F L = W W P = F L where is the demand in the product market. If you have perfect competition then =, and we have the simple rule that employment is chosen to equate MP L with the real wage. Alternative: the union and the rm bargain over the level of employment. This can be done simultaneously with the wage-setting decision: this results in the "e cient bargaining model" (the rm and union will choose a Pareto Optimal wage-employment combination). It can also be done sequentially (employment bargained over after the wage rate has been determined).

How are wages set/determined? monopoly union: the union (household) chooses the real wage unilaterally. Unrealistic but simple! Bargain: the union and rm bargain over the wage. monopsony: the rm sets the wage. An example of this is the e ciency wage model. This is realistic for low-skilled "Mc Jobs". Why do some economists like these models? Otherwise the labour market is competitive and the household is always on the labour supply curve. Employment can only uctuate with the real wage, and since empirical estimates of the labour supply elasticity are low, one would expect less variation in employment than appears to be the case.

If real wage exceeds the MRS labour/consumption, then the labour supply is in nitely elastic at the current real wage. Output and employment can increase even if the real wage falls a little bit! 2 Basic Wage-setting model. Ascari (2000) took basic Taylor model and put it in a DGSE setting. It is a right to mange model: the union sets the (nominal) wage given that the rm chooses employment. We will assume that the wage is xed over the period of the contract.

One rm per union-household. When the union sets the wage, it takes aggregate output, pro ts and prices as constant. Only e ect of varying the wage is to a ect its labour income and leisure. 2. One Period Model. Keep life simple. One period rst! max U (C) + V ( L) labour demand. First note that: Y f = L f

this yields labour demand and corresponding output supply as functions of the own-product real wage: L f = W f p f y f = W f p f!! Second, to solve for the price we equate demand y d f equal to supply given

(W; P; Y ) p f W f yf d = P f P! p + f = pf +( )! Y = P! ft Y t P t pf = W W p f = W +( ) h P Y i h P Y i h P Y i +( )

This gives us the demand for output and labour as a function of W f ; P; Y : y f = 0 B B @ W +( $) h P Y i +( ) P C C A Y L f = 2 6 6 6 4 0 B B @ W +( ) h P Y i +( ) P C C A Y 3 7 7 7 5

Hence L f = W +( ) " hp Y i +( ) P Y # = W +( ) hp Y i +( ) Where = W " " = + ( ) ; = h P Y i" Assume " > : Note also that when = ; " = Y f = W "

We can now consider the optimization Note, W Hence max U(C) + V ( W " ) + h W " + P C i " + = W F L + rf K = P F (K; L): FOC this is the optimal " ex wage". U C = P V L "W (+") = (" ) W " V L W = " P () " U C Note that L = W " can be written as W " L = Y " " (2) P

take logs of () : X P = ln V L X P " Y " "! U c (Y ) "Di erentiate" wrt X; P; Y rearranging But x p = " L (x p) + L " y (x p) ( + " L ) = L " cy ( + " L ) = + ( ) + L + ( ) " = + ( ) c y (3)

Hence (x p) or the familiar! + ( ) + L = l + ( ) + ( ) + c y " # l + x p = c ( + ( )) y + ( ) + L x = p + y = l + c ( + ( )) + ( ) + L!

Two + periods: x t = X N s=0 s 2 N X i 4 s=0 = ` + c ( + ( )) + ( ) + ` s (p t+s + y t+s ) 3 5 OR x t = X N s=0 s 2 N X i 4 s=0 s x t+s The log-linearised reset wage is the weighted average of the optimal exwages over the lifetime of the contract: the arithmetic average if = : 3 5

3 Implications of wage setting models. If we compare wage and price setting models, they look similar: indeed, Ascari argues that a whole range of models can be put in the format x or p = X N s=0 s 2 N X i 4 s=0 the di erences arise because of the di erent. s [p t+s + y t+s ] 3 5 captures the e ect of output on wage-setting. A higher value of means that an increase in output generates bigger price rises. If = 0, we have the classic Taylor model, where there is no e ect of output on wage/price setting.

The mechanisms underlying are complex: but the basic thing is that as output increases and leisure decreased, the "real cost" of the additional output increases (the M RS between leisure and consumption) and also the MC curve is upward sloping if <. price setting: Chari, Kehoe and McGratten. CKM = ` + c + + ( ) = ` + c ( + ( )) + ( ) + ` For plausible parameter values, CKM <. ` ' 0:2; c ' ; '??; ' 0:

This means that nominal wages are less responsive to increases in output than prices. CKM = :2; = 0:2: When =, the di erence is due to ` in the denominator. Since " =, the term re ects the competitiveness of the labour market. If the union raises wages, then rms will substitute away from this type of labour: this e ect is bigger the larger. When output increases, the unions do increase wages, but are held back by the fact that other unions are not raising wages. In e ect, the markup of real wages over the MRS (C; `) goes down relative to its steady state value.

This is a Nash-equilibrium/coordination phenomenon. All wages rise by the same amount in equilibrium, but each rm is treating the actions of the others as given. In the price setting model, this e ect is absent. Product markets are competitive, so the real wage is always equal to the MRS (C; `) (constant markup of ). Real wages rise more in the price setting model, leading to ( ex) prices rising by more.

4 Other unionised models. 4. Yeoman farmer model. In this the labour supplier and the rm are "one": no pro ts, no wages: the "farmers " income is the revenue from sales of output. Single period problem max U (C) + V ( L)

subject to p f Y f = P C p f Y f = P L = ( ) f P Y 0 @ P! ft Y t A P t Can substitute in U 0 @ P f P! Y A + V 0 B @ 0 @ P! ft Y t A P t C A

Get the resulting Y F = ` + c + ( ) + ( ) + ` If = then exactly same as the unionised. 4.2 Craft Unions: Blanchard and Kiyotaki (987). Each household union supplies a type of labour. Every rm uses all types of labour. The rms have a CES technology for combiningthe labour with elasticity

Y t = " Z L 0 f df # The rm minimizes costs subject to the wages set by the craft unions L f = " Wf W # Y The resulting is same as in standard case.

5 Edge: wages and prices the same. Rochelle Edge (RED 2002): wages and prices the same. Depends on the assumptions about factor speci city. The reason: with rm speci c factors (such as labour), the price of the factor is not the same across di erent rms: let w it be the rm speci c wage. The optimal price is then p it = mc it = w it hence, if the rm s wage increases whilst other rms wages do not, then this increases its marginal cost. This will cause its price to rise relative to those of other rms, thus allowing the elsticity of rm demand to enter into its decision (and yields A )

If there is only homogeneous labour, the rms wages are constrained to be equal: an increase in wages applies to all rms, so that there is no relative price e ect, and the rms elasticity of demand does not enter into the optimal price (and yields CKM ). 6 Conclusion. wage setting can talk a variety of forms. Typically the simple monopoly union model with the right to manage labour demand. nominal wage rigidity: with rm speci c factors, nominal wage and price rigidity similar.

Can choose di erent models. For example, Erceg, Henderson an Levine (JEDC 2003) combine wage and price rigidity. The wage-setting model uses the Blanchard and Kiyotaki model.