Continuing Education Employee Perception Survey. Briefing. Prepared by: SDCCD Office of Institutional Research and Planning September 4, 2009

Similar documents
Q1 I am a: CCC College Survey SP2014- Governance Awareness 1 / 11. Answ ered: 46 Skipped: 0. Student. Classified (full-time) Classified (hourly)

2009 Computer Networking & Service Tech Summary Report

Pueblo Community College and 2010 Colorado Community College System (CCCS) Climate Surveys. Office of Institutional Research.

DALTON STATE COLLEGE DIVISION OF FISCAL AFFAIRS USER SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS

New Jersey City University Area: Finance, Controller/Budget Office Year:

F11 Freshman Check-in Summary Report

2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report

American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Quality Assurance Report Review Form:

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

2018 Curricular & Co-Curricular Assessment Needs Survey & Interview Report

Annual Report: Integrated Planning, Program Review, and Resource Allocation

I. INTRODUCTION II. ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES

Cumulative Count and Percent CampusClimate

Standard 8: Financial Planning & Management

CW/P. F a c i l i t i e s M a s t e r P l a n S e p t e m b e r 8,

Public Hearing. Truth in Taxation Notice of Tax increase Adoption of Fiscal Year 2016 Proposed Budget Board of Governor s Meeting June 10, 2015

METROPOLITAN STATE OF DENVER

Planning and Budgeting Integration (PBI) Model

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2006 Semester. Spring Semester 2006 Course and Teaching Evaluations

American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY

Treasury and Policy Board Office Accountability Report

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2007 Term. Spring 2007 Course and Teaching Evaluations

MCC MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT For the Period Ending September 30, MCC Funds Overview. OPERATIONAL FUNDS OVERVIEW (Funds 110 and 120)

North Orange County Community College District Integrated. Planning Manual March 2014 Update

Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018

Strategic Management & Metrics

Chabot College Fall 2007 Student Accreditation Survey: All Students

Saddleback College Strategic Planning Process. Recommended by the Consultation Council, 6/16/09 Approved by the President, 6/23/09 Revised, 8/6/09

Administrators Academic Senate CLASSIFIED GUESTS

Moody Middle School. Campus Improvement Plan Date Approved by Moody ISD Board of Trustees

Administrative Procedures Integrated Planning and Budgeting (IPB) Model

CATEGORY 8 PLANNING CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

ANNUAL PROGRAM PLANNING WORKSHEET (APPW)

Austin Community College. Internal Customer Satisfaction Survey. Spring 2003 Analysis of College-wide Services

Master Degree Exit Interview Landscape Architecture

Administrative Services Goals / Objectives * th Quarter Review 30 June 2008 & Annual Program Review

2018 Spring Pulse Survey Overview

STATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

Reedley College Academic Senate Minutes Tuesday, April 9, 2013 (2:00-3:30PM) Reedley Campus LRC 104 Madera Center AV1-207

AY2018 Senior Survey: College of Business Administration Report Introduction

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Fall 2005 Semester. Fall Semester 2005 Course and Teaching Evaluations

Nine Month Faculty Annualized Pay Option Program Enrollment Process

OUTDATED. Policy 2-10 Rev 6. Date June 26, Subject: RETIREMENT I. PURPOSE. To outline the university's policy toward retirement of personnel.

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) Shared Responsibility Mandate

NEBRASKA RURAL POLL. A Research Report. Optimism in Nonmetropolitan Nebraska: Perceptions of Well-Being Nebraska Rural Poll Results

Engagement Study February 2014

Master Degree Exit Interview Engineering Management

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR RESPONDING TO FINANCIAL EMERGENCIES WITHIN THE SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY SYSTEM (Revised)

Community Survey 2014

Gillett School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2018

Governmental Accounting Standards Board

SAC PLANNING & BUDGET MEETING MINUTES MAY 5, 2015 SAC FOUNDATION BOARD ROOM 1:30P.M. 3:00P.M. Approved 9/1/2015

Financial Management Guidelines and Procedures

General Faculty Meeting January Brigham Young University Idaho

BUDGET MESSAGE FISCAL YEAR Presented May 13, 2015

Graduate Survey Master's Degree Respondents Orlando Campus

Vernon College Annual Planning Calendar Academic Year

Colorado School of Mines Board of Trustees Meeting June 18, Operating Budget for the Fiscal Year

Sacramento City College Strategic Planning System

THE ASEAN BUSINESS OUTLOOK SURVEY 2011

UPBC Report University Planning and Budget Committee President Zulma Toro Faculty Senate Budget Proposal Recommendations

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science

MPC Employee Demographics. Presented to the Board of Trustees May 24, 2011

2016 Employee Benefits Survey. University Senate Fringe Benefits Committee

STATE FUNDING REQUESTED VS. GOVERNOR S PROPOSAL. Proposed by the Governor

Evaluation of Annual Action Plan (ongoing) and Institutional Effectiveness Plans Responsibility: Component Leadership

Sequoias Community College District RESOURCE

We produced the Strategic Planning Process (SPP) using the following design principles:

On behalf of the Resource Allocation Task Force (RATF), I am pleased to forward you our final report. Your charge to the RATF was:

Student Senate. mission

Fiscal Year Budget Planning & Outlook

Master Degree Exit Interview Manufacturing Engineering

Evaluation of Annual Action Plan (ongoing) and Institutional Effectiveness Plans Responsibility: Component Leadership

Minutes Senate Budget Policies Committee Friday, February 16, 2018, 2 4 p.m. CL 817

IDENTIFICATION AR II /15/06 THE PLANNING, BUDGETING, AND ASSESSMENT CYCLE. Part 1. THE PLANNING, BUDGETING, AND ASSESSMENT CYCLE

District Office Administrative Services Unit Review (ASUR) and Annual Operational Planning

Peralta Planning and Budgeting Integration (PBI) Model. OVERVIEW (August 6, 2009)

UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY Policies and Procedures

New Campus Budget Model

UCF Finance Corporation

All Campuses Seattle College as of 6/30/2015

Community Survey 2017

Sacramento City College

BACB REQUIREMENTS FOR TYPE 2 CONTINUING EDUCATION

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering

Planning and Assessment Manual. Institutional Research & Effectiveness

4 Planning, Budgeting, and Institutional Effectiveness

Proposed Budget. S u p e r i n t e n d e n t o f S c h o o l s F e b r u a r y 13, 2013

Centers of Actuarial Excellence (CAE)

Institutional Diversity: Encourages students to have a public voice and share their ideas openly

Undergraduate Students Graduate Students International Students Graduating Students Developing a CPI Position...

Excel-Based Active Learning in the Management Accounting Course K A R E N W. B R A U N C A S E W E S T E R N R E S E R V E U N I V E R S I T Y

Welcome to the Spring 2018 Budget Forum! Hosted by the President s Budget Advisory Committee

Lassen Community College Institutional Planning and Budget Development Process Handbook

CHARTER PLANNING COUNCIL

SOUTH SEATTLE COMMUNITY COLLEGE COUNCIL BYLAWS (Approved June 1998) PHILOSOPHY

INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Procedures Manual. Developed by the Office of Institutional Effectiveness

Santa Rosa Junior College Adopted Budget

CUNA/LEAGUE 2015 EXAM SURVEY REPORT February 2016

Transcription:

Continuing Education Employee Perception Survey Spring 2009 Briefing Prepared by: SDCCD September 4, 2009

Introduction 2

Overview & Purpose The three SDCCD colleges and Continuing Education conducted employee surveys in the Spring 2009 as part of their accreditation ti selfstudy process. Information from the surveys will be used to inform the planning action items in the self-study report, as well as provide support for other planning decisions. This survey was designed to elicit employee perceptions and opinions on institutional effectiveness, programs, services, instruction, facilities, and overall satisfaction. The 2009 Employee Perception Survey was significantly different from the previous employee survey, therefore comparisons are difficult. 3

Instrumentation The survey contained : 77 forced-choicechoice items 71 Likert scaled items 6 profile questions 4 open-ended ended questions Face and content validity were ensured by as follows: Questions were aligned with Accreditation Standards, Questions were directly related to the purpose of eliciting employee perceptions and opinions, Questions avoided addressing complex processes or systems, Validation through feedback from the Accreditation Coordination Committee. Survey was piloted in Fall 08 to establish reliability 4

Methodology The Continuing Education Employee Perception Survey used a census sample design (all employees at the sites were invitedit to participate). i t The expected response rate at each site was 20%-35%. The survey was made available both online and in a paper and pencil format. Hardcopy forms were returned anonymously in drop boxes at designated locations on the college campuses. The survey took approximately 30 minutes to complete. The survey administration window was approximately three weeks. 5

Implementation The District Accreditation Coordinating Committee was integral to the process through: Reviewing the survey design, Reviewing and finalizing the survey instrument, Reviewing the final report and providing recommendations. Pre-notification emails, invitations to survey and reminder notices were sent via e-mail to all employees. The District sent the survey invitation via email during the fourth week of the semester. Drop boxes were made available to facilitate the return of completed hardcopy surveys. 6

Respondent Profile 826 employees received invitations to survey. 306 completed the survey (37% response rate) 4% from Centre City, 13% Cesar Chavez, 6% ECC, 19% Mid-City City, 23% North City, 21% West City, and 14% CE Headquarters 78% worked primarily on campus and 22% worked off campus 24% were full-time contract faculty, 48% part-time adjunct faculty, 1% prorata faculty, 19% classified, 3% manager, 2% supervisor, and 3% unreported 60% of the respondents have been with the District for 11 or more years, 11% 7-10 years, 24% 2-6 years, and 5% 1 year or less 7

The Findings 8

Level of Quality 34% 57% 47% 24% 25% 22% 41% 33% 44% 41% 36% 30% 19% 23% 18% 16% 14% 7% 12% 12% 7% 3% 1% 9% 3% 2% 3% 4% 8% 4% Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied 9

Level of Quality 8% 20% 17% 30% 15% 19% 34% 37% 36% 34% 29% 36% 30% 25% 28% 34% 36% 23% 18% 13% 13% 10% 7% 6% 9% 6% 6% 7% 9% 4% Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied 10

Level of Quality 15% 28% 32% 32% 20% 23% 21% 12% 10% 6% Q19 Q20 Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied 11

Organization for Student Learning 41% 31% 30% 30% 22% 22% 49% 45% 45% 45% 38% 49% 14% 14% 14% 8% 2% 4% 8% 9% 7% 7% 0% 1% 3% 2% 3% 5% Q21 Q22 Q23 Q24 Q25 Q26 23% 28% Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree 12

Organization for Student Learning 19% 29% 18% 22% 19% 15% 39% 35% 35% 43% 52% 47% 25% 31% 22% 24% 21% 19% 17% 8% 10% 11% 8% 10% 3% 4% 5% 3% 2% 4% Q27 Q28 Q29 Q30 Q31 Q32 Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree 13

Organization for Student Learning 14% 31% 27% 30% 37% 39% 37% 47% 42% 35% 38% 42% 24% 22% 19% 16% 14% 12% 11% 7% 7% 8% 9% 5% 9% 2% 4% 5% 4% 2% Q33 Q34 Q35 Q36 Q37 Q38 Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree 14

Organization for Student Learning 26% 35% 45% 41% 38% 26% 44% 49% 40% 37% 39% 45% 19% 16% 18% 12% 12% 13% 8% 6% 4% 4% 4% 5% 3% 3% 2% 3% 1% 2% Q39 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q44 Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree 15

Organization for Student Learning 30% 39% 49% 44% 15% 11% 5% 1% 3% 2% Q45 Q46 Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree 16

Curriculum and Instruction 83% 76% 74% 72% 56% 85% 34% 20% 24% 24% 14% 12% 3% 4% 3% 4% 10% 2% Q47 Q48 Q49 Q50 Q51 Q52 To a great extent Somewhat Not at all 17

Curriculum and Instruction 57% 49% 49% 39% 54% 43% 28% 44% 37% 35% 9% 4% 9% 13% 8% 4% 2% 4% 5% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Q53 Q54 Q55 Q56 Q57 Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree 18

Support for Student Personal and Academic Growth Academic Growth 24% 11% 13% 37% 22% 26% 34% 37% 38% 36% 46% 39% 21% 23% 20% 19% 27% 22% 17% 19% 14% 18% 4% 9% 2% 8% 5% 0% 8% 2% Q58 Q59 Q60 Q61 Q62 Q63 Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree 19

Resource Management and Development 15% 23% 27% 25% 21% 20% 49% 45% 49% 49% 45% 43% 20% 18% 22% 15% 17% 18% 12% 13% 12% 10% 5% 5% 4% 4% 2% 2% 4% 5% Q64 Q65 Q66 Q67 Q68 Q69 Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree 20

Resource Management and Development 15% 17% 22% 17% 16% 11% 47% 37% 41% 44% 44% 47% 22% 19% 17% 21% 30% 27% 19% 15% 12% 12% 11% 8% 3% 9% 5% 6% 3% 5% Q70 Q71 Q72 Q73 Q74 Q75 Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree 21

Resource Management and Development 13% 25% 39% 41% 35% 23% 12% 7% 2% 3% Q76 Q77 Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree 22

Conclusions 23

Top 5 Conclusions 1. Generally, survey respondents are satisfied with the quality of instruction and counseling. There is less satisfaction with technology resources, classrooms and staff development. The greatest dissatisfaction with the quality of resources is parking, financial resources and assigned workspace. 2. Most respondents are familiar with the mission of Continuing Education and believe that the programs, services and planning are consistent with the mission. Respondents also believe that institutional effectiveness is valued at CE and that there is support and open dialog about improving student learning and institutional processes. 3. Approximately half of the respondents believe that faculty play an extensive roll in matters related to educational programs including hiring i of faculty, developing institutional policies and that the faculty is sufficiently involved in curriculum development. Additionally, slightly over half of the respondents believe that CE establishes governance structures, processes and practices that facilitate effective communication among constituencies. 24

Top 5 Conclusions 4. Nearly three quarters of the respondents believe that the criteria, qualifications and procedures for hiring employees are clearly stated and followed. Moreover, well over half believe that performance evaluations have been conducted according to contract guidelines. 5. The majority of respondents believe that the campus environment is conducive to personal development for the student population and that CE implements programs, practices and services that enhance student appreciation of diversity. it 25

End Full report posted on Institutional Research Office at: http://research.sdccd.edu/pages/115.asp 26