DA2598 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. April 19, 2016

Similar documents
UCM DA 176. September 7, 2018 VICE CHANCELLOR AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: 1 ACTION ITEM

TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: DISCUSSION ITEM

~~\0<-Q Gene D. Block Chancellor

University of California Capital Programs Capital Projects Budget Approval Process Summary

University of California Current Funds Revenues By Source by Campus Schedule 12-A

Small Business Utilization. Legislative Report. January 2015

CHAIR OF THE BOARD CHAIR OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY

BERKELEY DAVIS IRVINE LOS ANGELES MERCED RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO INFORMATION ITEM. Priority: Normal

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF ETHICS, COMPLIANCE AND AUDIT SERVICES

U N I V E R S I T Y O F C A L I F O R N I A

ACTION ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

~if:!- UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. May2, Vice Chancellors for Administration Campus Risk Managers

7 ATLzr UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. January 30, 2014

CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY

FUNDING STREAMS INITIATIVE SUMMARY REPORT

TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: INFORMATION ITEM ANNUAL REPORT ON MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECTS IMPLEMENTATION FISCAL YEAR

Delegations of Authority - Authority to Act on behalf of (vacant) Vice Chancellor, Administration & Finance position

Accounting and Fiscal Services Travel and Entertainment

ACTION ITEM CONSENT APPROVAL OF INDIVIDUAL PARTIALLY OR FULLY STATE-FUNDED COMPENSATION ACTIONS AS DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION RECOMMENDATION

UCSB Audit and Advisory Services Internal Audit Report. Travel and Entertainment. December 13, Performed by: Raphaëlla Nau, Staff Auditor

BERKELEY DAVIS IRVINE LOS ANGELES MERCED RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO. Chair of the Assembly of the Academic Senate

U N I V E R S I T Y O F C A L I F O R N I A

INFORMATION ITEM. A. The Chairman of the Board, the Chair of the Committee on Compensation, and the President approved the following recommendations:

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, ACADEMIC SENATE

BERKELEY DAVIS IRVINE LOS ANGELES MERCED RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO

TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: INFORMATION ITEM MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECTS IMPLEMENTATION REPORT, FISCAL YEAR

University of California Table of Contents June 30, 2008

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

ACCOUNTING CODES: GENERAL LEDGER. I. Introduction 2. II. Assignment and Use of Codes 4

BERKELEY DAVIS IRVINE LOS ANGELES MERCED RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO

Presentation to the University Committee on Planning and Budget

June 10, VIA & U.S. MAIL

AB436 Labor Compliance Program FAQs 2012

U N I V E R S I T Y O F C A L I F O R N I A, A C A D E M I C S E N A T E

ACTION ITEM APPROVAL OF INDIVIDUAL SALARY ITEMS AS DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION RECOMMENDATION

BERKELEY DAVIS IRVINE LOS ANGELES MERCED RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY. Annual Financial Report

Ovid Technologies, Inc. Online License Agreement

In accordance with authority previously delegated by the Regents, interim or concurrence action was taken on routine or emergency matters as follows:

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

ADDENDUM NO. 2 REQUEST FOR INFORMATION. for. Contracted Marketer. Landfill Biomethane Gas from Keithville, Louisiana.

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. March 17, 2011

Business Requirements Document SR Correction to PPP6004 Report for State Wage and Withholding Reporting

Council of University of California Retiree Associations (CUCRA) Survey of Member Associations

University of California ANNUAL REPORT ON MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECTS IMPLEMENTATION. Fiscal Year

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

In accordance with authority previously delegated by the Regents, interim or concurrence action was taken on routine or emergency matters as follows:

TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM

TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

University of California Staff Workforce Profile 2014

Annual Financial Report 12/13

The University of California Retirement System Defined Contribution Plan and Tax-Deferred 403(b) Plan Year Ended June 30, 2004

Budget Planning Update. Academic and Business Administrators

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

1. APPROVAL OF SALARY ADJUSTMENTS FOR CHANCELLORS AND THE DIRECTOR OF THE LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY AS DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION

UC Retirement Plan Summary Plan Description

ATTACHMENT 2. University of California Capital Resources Management Pilot Phase of the Delegated Process for Capital Improvement Projects

The Regents of the University of California. COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS COMMITTEE ON FINANCE August 30, 2001

new dimensions Regents approve changes to the UC-managed funds

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS INTERNAL AUDIT SERVICES. Development and Alumni Relations Donor Restrictions on Gift Expenditures Project #13-04

Enclosure UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. November 17, 2015 MEMBERS OF THE REGENTS COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS

University of California Staff Workforce Profile 2009

Minutes of Meeting November 8, 2013

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan Summary Plan Description

UC Health Sciences Faculty Retirement Proposal, October 2003

Verano Place - Cyber Cafe

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, ACADEMIC SENATE. May 23, 2017 JANET NAPOLITANO, PRESIDENT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. Re: Faculty Salaries.

Samantha Carrier. May 4, 2009

Defined Contribution Plan Summary Plan Description

UC Retirement Plan 1976 Tier Summary Plan Description

SUBJECT: Auxiliary & Self Supporting Activities (ASSA) - Differential Income Rate Review

/*Creates Fiscal Year FTE file for InfoCenter dashboard and Ad-Hoc analysis*/

Tax-Deferred 403(b) Plan Summary Plan Description

The Committee forwards the following compensation items from its Closed Session meeting for approval:

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. September 13, 2012

UC MERCED CAPITAL PLANNING PROCESS CAPITAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT Issued: February 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS. Table of Contents...1

ACTION ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

DRAFT SEPTEMBER 21, 2015 DRAFT REVISIONS by ASSOCIATION - OCTOBER 7, 2015

TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: DISCUSSION ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

A. The Chairman of the Board, the Chair of the Committee on Compensation, and the President of the University approved the following recommendations:

A. Certify the UCLA Long Range Development Plan Amendment (2017) and Student Housing Projects Subsequent Environmental Impact Report.

In accordance with authority previously delegated by the Regents, interim or concurrence action was taken on routine or emergency matters as follows:

BERKELEY DAVIS IRVINE LOS ANGELES MERCED RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO. Chair of the Assembly of the Academic Senate

Business Requirements Document. SR IX 2017 Lump Sum Payment

The Regents of the University of California. COMMITTEE ON INVESTMENTS INVESTMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE February 11, 2004

Business Requirements Document

TO THE MEMBERS OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON REGENTS PROCEDURES: ACTION ITEM PROPOSED REVISIONS TO REGENTS POLICIES ON CAPITAL PROJECTS

Benefits Newsletter for UC Retirees Volume 23 Number 1

Observations About Regents Scholarship Yield Rates: Change and Variance

U.S. Capitol Building, Room S-230 U.S. Capitol Building, Room S-224 Washington, DC Washington, DC 20510

Definitions. For this Regents Rule, the terms listed below have the following meaning:

UC Retirement Benefits. Guide to Your. A Complete FOR FACULTY AND STAFF ELIGIBLE ON OR AFTER JULY 1, 2016 RETIREMENT PLAN SUMMARIES

University of California Retirement Plan

Benefits Newsletter for UC Retirees Volume 21 Number 2

Foothill-De Anza Community College District

Transcription:

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DA2598 BERKELEY DAVIS IRVINE LOS ANGELES MERCED RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA SANTA CRUZ CHANCELLORS DIRECTOR LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER VICE PRESIDENT AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES 1111 Franklin Street Oakland, California 94607-5200 Phone: (510) 987-9074 Fax:(510) 987-9086 http://www.ucop.edu Delegation of Authority Amendments to the Capital Improvement Program and Transfers of Capital Funds The Standing Orders of The Regents provide certain authorities to the President of the University concerning amendments to the Capital Improvement Program and transfers of capital funds. A. Non-State-Funded Major and Minor Capital Improvement Projects with a Total Project Cost Not to Exceed $10,000,000 (aj(1) Except as provided in paragraph (q)(2) below, the President is authorized to approve amendments to the Capital Improvement Program for projects not to exceed $10 million. The President is also authorized to approved amendments to the Capital Improvement Program for projects exceeding $10 million up to and including $20 million, provided that concurrence is obtained from the Chairman of the Board and the Chairman of the Committee on Grounds and Buildings and also provided that all actions taken in excess of $10 million up to and including $20 million under this authority be reported at the next following meeting of the Board. However, the following shall be approved by the Board: (1.) projects with a total cost in excess of $20 million, (2) for projects in excess of $20 million, any modification in project cost over standard cost-rise augmentation in excess of 25%, or (3) capital improvement projects of any construction cost when, in the judgment of the President, a project merits review and 1 For the purposes of this delegation, amendments to the Capital Improvement Program refers to capital project budget and associated scope approvals.

Page 2 approval by The Regents because of special circumstances related to budget matters, external financing, fundraising activities, project design, environmental impacts, community concerns, or substantial program modifications. You are delegated the authority in your respective areas of responsibility to approve amendments to the Capital Improvement Program for non-state-funded minor capital projects (total project cost equal to or less than $750,000) and non-statefunded major capital improvement projects (total project cost greater than $750,000) with a total project cost not to exceed $10 million excludes: (1) the addition of a new project with a cost in excess of $10 million; (2) any modification in project budget that results in a project costing in excess of $10 million; (3) any substantial program modification intended use of a project previously approved by The Regents or by my office, including any internal re-delegations; (4) any project funded wholly or in part by State funds; (5) any project that was denied funding by the State for reasons other than the unavailability of funding; or (6) projects involving Chancellorial residences or offices. Category (6) projects are subject to the approval requirements established in The Regents policy on University-Provided Housing, http.universityofcalifornia.edu/policies/7708.pdf 2. This authority 3 in physical characteristics or Any project with potential significant environmental impact is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Therefore, there is no guarantee that projects added to the Capital Improvement Program will necessarily proceed to construction. The decision to proceed occurs, typically, at the design approval stage and must be accompanied by appropriate environmental impact information. Authority for project design approval is addressed in DA2597. The authority herein for non-state-funded major capital improvement projects (total project cost exceeding $750,000 and not to exceed $10 million) may not be redelegated. The authority herein for non-state-funded minor capital improvement projects (total project cost not to exceed $750,000 and as consistent with the con straints referenced above) may be redelegated. B. Pilot Phase of the Delegated Process for Capital Improvement Projects ( Delegated Process ) Amendments to the Capital Improvement Program for Projects Not to Exceed $70 million 2 Total project cost shall be defined as all costs of the project including administrative, design, construction, interest accrued during construction where applicable, and equipment costs. As used herein, substantial program modification to be determined in consultation with my office.

Page 3 (q)(2) This paragraph shall apply exclusively to capital projects for those campus entities approved by the Committee on Grounds and Buildings for inclusion in the Pilot Phase of the Delegated Process for Capital Improvement Projects. The President is authorized to approve amendments to the Capital Improvement Program for projects not to exceed $70 million. However, the following shall be approved by the Board: (1) projects with a total cost in excess of $70 million, (2) capital improvement projects of any construction cost when, in the judgment of the President, a project merits review and approval by The Regents because of special circumstances related to budget matters, external financing, fundraising activities, project design, environmental impacts, community concerns, or substantial program modifications. The President is authorized to approve an increase in project cost as long as the total augmented project cost remains under $70 million; for augmented projects resulting in a total project cost in excess of $70 million, the augmented project shall be approved by the Board. This paragraph shall become inoperative and is repealed on March 31, 2017, unless a later Regents action, that becomes effective on or before March 31, 2017, deletes or extends the date on which it becomes inoperative and is repealed. Chancellors are delegated the authority provided under Standing Order 100.4(q)(2) for projects within their respective jurisdictions to approve amendments to the Capital Improvement Program for qualifying projects with a total project cost up to and including $70 million. A qualifying project is one that is eligible for, and has been reviewed under the Delegated Process, and has been determined not to require elevation to The Regents for approval. cations provided: (1) the total project budget when augmented does not exceed $70 million, and (2) any modification in project cost does not exceed a cumulative augmentation of 25% over the original approved budget, and (3) a scope change does 4 You may approve budget andlor scope modifi Eligibility for the Delegated Process requires that the project demonstrates: consistency with the accepted Ten- Year Capital Financial Plan, the accepted Physical Design Framework and the approved Long Range Development Plan; compliance with CEQA, and all applicable laws, regulations, and University and Regental policies; financial feasibility; and that no special circumstances exist that may merit review by the Regents.

Page 4 5 in physical characteristics or intended not entail a substantial program modification use of a project previously approved under the Delegated Process. Because The Regents desire to be informed of significant budget, scope, or schedule changes for all projects-- including delegated projects--campuses are to inform the Office of the President of such changes through procedures developed for early Regental notification for high interest projects. Chancellors are responsible for ensuring the financial feasibility of their campus s Ten-Year Capital Financial Plans, consistent with the Delegated Process. Changes or updates to those Plans are submitted annually to the office of the Associate Vice President of Capital Asset Strategies & Finance for presentation to and acceptance by The Regents. For individual projects not identified in the accepted Ten-Year Capital Financial Plan, and with a total project cost under the $70 million threshold, a campus may seek Regental budget approval for the project The authority delegated to the Chancellors under Standing Order 100.4(q)(2) may not be further redelegated. The authority delegated herein to the Chancellors shall remain unless a later Regents action causes Standing Order 100.4(q)(2) to become inoperative or is repealed. C. Transfer of Funds for Capital Improvement Projects Approved under the Authority Delegated Herein (o) The President is authorized to approve transfers or allocations of University operating funds and transfers of funds designated for Capital Improvement purposes, subject to any limitations which might be imposed by the terms of said funds, provided: 1. That no such transfer or allocation shall result in the establishment of a new policy, program, or project involving a continuing commit ment; 2. That no transfer or allocation shall be made from a reserve fund for a purpose other than that for which the reserve funds was established. As used herein, substantial program modification to be determined in consultation with my office.

Budget Chancellors, et al. Page 5 You are delegated the authority in your respective areas of responsibility to transfer funds to capital improvement projects approved under the authority delegated to you herein. The authority delegated under Standing Order 100.4(o) for non-state-funded minor capital improvement projects (total project cost not to exceed $750,000), approved by you or your delegee, may be redelegated. The authority delegated under Standing Order 100.4(o) for non-state-funded major capital improvement projects (total project cost over $750,000) approved by you may not be further redelegated. D. Reporting The exercise of the authority per Standing Order 100.4 (q)(1) and (q)(2) shall be in accordance with guidelines established by the Regents and the President, as they may be amended from time to time. These shall include and are not limited to the following reporting and accountability requirements: (a) the Annual Report on Major Capital Projects Implementation Report, reporting the adherence to plans and aggregated performance on specific metrics of Regental and Presidential interest; (b) input budget approvals and schedule changes to the capital database; and (c) project close-out capital improvement budgets ( Post-Project CIBs ) for projects over $10 million within sixty (60) days of the filing of the Notice of Completion and a final CIB at the fiscal close of the project. 6 This delegation supersedes the delegation of March 1, 2013, to the Chancellors, the Director--Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and the Vice President- - Agriculture and Natural Resources (DA2574). I (4net Na olitano Pesident cc: Division Leaders Associate Vice President Capital Asset Strategies & Finance Director Capital Planning Universitywide Policy Office 6 Reference: February 28, 2011 letter from VP and Capital Resources to the Vice Chancellors of Administration, Vice Chancellors for Budget and Planning and Capital Program Leadership Forum Members.