Sanger (City of) TX. Credit Strengths. Trend of growing reserve levels. Continued tax base growth. Favorable location 40 miles north of Dallas

Similar documents
Celina Independent School District, TX

Columbia School District, MO

Montgomery County, TX

Lubbock (City of), TX

Rockwall County, TX. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Above average socioeconomic indices. Credit Challenge

City of Mesquite, TX

Huffman Independent School District, TX

Taos Municipal School District 1, NM

Roselle Park Borough, NJ

Rio Rancho, NM. Credit Strengths. Sizeable and stable tax base. Healthy reserves. Manageable debt burden with rapid payout.

Socorro Independent School District, TX

Allen Independent School District, TX

Dallas County Community College District, TX

Socorro Independent School District, TX

Cherokee County Board of Education, AL

Town of Beekman, NY. Credit Strengths. Solid reserve and liquidity levels. Low debt burden with rapid repayment. Credit Challenges

Town of Easton, MA. Credit Strengths. Manageable long-term liabilities. Credit Challenges. Reliance on reserves to address budget gaps

Westport (Town of) CT

Montgomery County, TX

Las Cruces School District 2, NM

Butler (Village of), WI

Agenda. New Mexico School District Bond Ratings 9/8/17

State Outlook: Debt Affordability. NCSL Conference Gail Sussman, Managing Director

Findlay City School District, OH

Somerset Hills School District, NJ

WILTON (TOWN OF) CT. Update to credit analysis. Credit strengths. » Affluent residential tax base. Credit challenges

Volusia County School District (FL)

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 to Framingham, MA's $43.9M GO bonds, MIG 1 to $4.4M GO BANs

Weber School District, UT

New Issue: Moody's upgrades Edgewater, NJ's GO to Aa2: assigns MIG 1 to $15.4M in BANs

Cocoa (City of) FL. Update to credit analysis following assignment of Aa2 issuer rating. CREDIT OPINION 12 April Summary.

City of Oak Creek, WI

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to West Virginia SBA's $44.4M Capital Improvement Ref. Rev. Bonds, Ser Global Credit Research - 08 Sep 2017

City of Las Cruces, NM

Snohomish County Public Utility District 1

Bernalillo Municipal School District 1 (Sandoval County), NM

Carroll (County of) MD

Bexar County, TX. Exhibit 1 Assessed Valuation Gains Reflect Continued Economic Activity CLIENT SERVICES. Source: Bexar County, TX,

Township of Tredyffrin, PA

Edison (Township of) NJ

Newport News (City of) VA

Celina Independent School District, TX

Wicomico County, MD. Credit Strengths. » Well-funded pension plan. Credit Challenges. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade

West Fargo Public School District No. 6, ND

Park District of La Grange, IL

OECD Workshop on Data Collection

Prince William County, VA

City of Oakland, CA. Update to Credit Analysis. CREDIT OPINION 19 April Summary

Newport News, VA. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Strong financial management. Credit Challenges. Below average demographics

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa2 UND/Aa3 ENH to Roswell ISD (Chaves County), NM's GOULT bonds, Ser Sep 2018

St. Mary's County, MD

Bothell (City of) WA

Hoover (City of), AL

Oakland (City of), CA

Rating Action: Moody's Upgrades the City of Sacramento, CA's Lease Revenue Bonds to A1; Confirms Ser and Ser. 1993A at A2; outlook is stable

Findlay City School District, OH

Plaza of the Americas 600 North Pearl Street Suite 2165 Dallas, TX 75201

Clovis Municipal School District 1 (Curry County), NM

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings

Alamogordo Municipal School District No. 1 (Otero County), NM

Rating Update: Moody's affirms Aa3 on Waukegan Park District, IL's GO debt

George W. Kuhn Drainage District (Oakland County), MI

Massachusetts (Commonwealth of)

Jal Public School District 19, NM

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings in the European Union

City of Tega Cay, SC. Annual Comment on Tega Cay RATING. ISSUER COMMENT 23 March 2018

Port Jefferson Union Free School District, NY

Moody s Muni Bond Rating Criteria & KS Local Government Trends

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to 2016B & C Senior Bonds of Central Florida Expressway Auth. (CFX), FL; Outlook positive

Prince William County, VA

Evanston (City of), IL

Mongolian Banking System

Connecticut (State of) State Revolving Fund

New Rochelle City School District, NY

Bloomfield S.D. 6 (San Juan County), NM

Masconomet Regional School District, MA

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to Trinity Health Credit Group's (MI) Ser bonds; outlook revised to stable

Township of Nutley, NJ

New Issue: Moody's assigns A1 to Ford County USD No. 443's (KS) GOs Series 2015-A and Series 2015-B

Siauliu Bankas, AB. Siauliu Bankas capital metrics will strengthen with EBRD s debt-to-equity conversion. ISSUER COMMENT 13 August 2018

Jersey City Community Charter School, NJ

City of Albuquerque, New Mexico

New Issue: Moody's assigns MIG 1 to Oakland City's (CA) TRAN

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aa1 issuer and bond ratings of the International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm) with a stable outlook

Underwriting standards for credit cards and auto loans tighten modestly, a positive

Duquesne University, PA

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Lowe's unsecured ratings to Baa1; P-2 commercial paper rating affirmed 12 Dec 2018

Policy on the "SEC Rule 17g-7 of Representation and Warranties" (R&Ws)

Shreveport, LA. Credit Strengths. Credit Challenges. Very limited liquidity. Weak income and employment trends. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade

Los Alamos Public School District, NM

Sevierville (City of) TN

Moody s Upgrades Montco s Outlook

Regional Economic Outlook

Albuquerque Muni. SD 12 (Bernalillo Cnty), NM

City of Isle of Palms, SC

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago, IL

US Local Government GO Debt Methodology

Concord Hospital, NH

Duquesne University of the Holy Spirit, PA

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades South Carolina Public Service Authority revenue bonds; rating outlook negative

Transcription:

CREDIT OPINION Sanger (City of) TX New Issue: Moody's Assigns A1 to City of Sanger's, TX Certificates of Obligation, Series 2017 New Issue Summary Rating Rationale Moody's Investors Service has assigned a A1 rating to the City of Sanger's, TX $9.32 million Combination Tax and Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 2017. At the same time, Moody's maintains the A1 on outstanding rated parity debt. Contacts Alex Rawlings +1 (214) 979-6841 Analyst alex.rawlings@moodys.com John Nichols AVP - Analyst john.nichols@moodys.com 214-979-6851 The A1 rating is based on the city's growing yet modestly sized tax base and strong financial position. The rating also incorporates the city's average wealth indices and manageable debt burden. Credit Strengths Trend of growing reserve levels Continued tax base growth Favorable location 40 miles north of Dallas Credit Challenges Modestly sized tax base Tax base and employment concentration Rating Outlook Moody's generally does not assign outlooks to local government credits with this amount of debt outstanding. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade Substantial growth and diversification of the tax base Substantive improvement in wealth indicators Declines in debt burden Factors that Could Lead to a Downgrade Tax base declines Declines in reserves or liquidity Substantial increases in debt burden

Key Indicators Exhibit 1 Source: Sanger Audited Financial Statements, Moodys Investors Service Recent Developments Since the May 2016 rating report, Moody's has received the city's fiscal 2016 audited financial report and fiscal 2017 assessed valuation data. That information has been incorporated, along with information related to the Series 2017 issuance, below. Detailed Rating Considerations Economy and Tax Base: Modestly Sized Tax Base; Further Growth Expected The city's tax base will continue to grow moderately over the near term given expected commercial and residential development. Located in Denton County (Aaa stable), 40 miles north of Dallas (A1 negative) on Interstate 35, the city is primarily a residential community. Active development within the city as well as strong valuation growth of existing properties has boosted assessed valuation by 13% to $526 million for fiscal 2017. Although the city's tax base remains small in comparison to peer cities, annual growth has averaged 8% over the past five years and is expected to continue going forward. City officials report six residential subdivisions in various stages of development. The city's tax base is somewhat concentrated, primarily due to the presence of a Wal-Mart (Aa2 stable) distribution facility. WalMart accounts for 22% of the city's tax base for fiscal 2017 and the top 10 taxpayers comprise 31%. City officials estimate that the facility employs 1,200 people, which is substantial given the city's estimated population of 7,747 as of 2016. Wealth metrics among city residents are average, with an estimated median family income at 100% of the national level as of 2015. Financial Operations and Reserves: Strong Finances Expected to be Maintained Financially, the city is expected to remain strong due to conservative fiscal management as well as continued revenue growth. Following a slight General Fund deficit in 2012, the city as posted General Fund surpluses in each of the past four years. Available General Fund reserves are now $2.4 million or 37% of revenues. Operating funds (inclusive of the General and Debt Service Funds) are also healthy, with a total available fund balance of $2.8 million or 44% of revenue. The general fund received $755,066 of net transfers from the city's utility funds in fiscal 2016, although exclusive of transfers and other special items general fund revenues did exceed expenditures by $293,122. The enterprise funds (water, sewer, electric) have historically reported surplus operations and city officials expect no deterioration going forward. This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication, please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the most updated credit rating action information and rating history. 2

Year-to-date financial information provided by the city suggests that another surplus will be achieved in fiscal 2017. Overall, city officials do not anticipate any significant draws on reserves aside from funds held in the Capital Projects Fund that are devoted to various capital items. The city maintains substantial revenue raising flexibility with ad valorem tax rates, which currently total $6.80/ $100. This levy is well below the maximum of $25/$1000. Management does not expect to increase tax rates for the foreseeable future. LIQUIDITY Liquidity maintained in the city's operating funds at fiscal year-end 2016 is a healthy $2.9 million or 45% of operating revenue. No deterioration of liquidity is expected in future. Debt and Pensions: Manageable Debt Burden; No Additional Debt Plans Sanger's debt is expected to remain manageable given a growing tax base and conservative capital planning. The city's net direct debt burden is equal to 1.1% of fiscal 2017 assessed value, which is in line with national medians but low in comparison to similar Texas cities. Inclusive of debt issued by overlapping entities, the city's overall debt burden is 3.7% of assessed valuation. The debt burdens are net of $21.6 million of obligations supported by the city's water and sewer funds, including the Series 2017 issuance. Water and sewer operations provided 1.72x coverage of utility fund debt service in fiscal 2016 and coverage has been sufficient in each of the past three years. Without adjustments to exclude self-supported GO debt, the city's direct debt burden would be an elevated 5.2% of assessed value. The city does not expect to issue additional debt within the next two years. DEBT STRUCTURE 56% of the city's general obligation debt is scheduled to be retired within the next 10 years. The final maturity is scheduled to occur in 2036. DEBT-RELATED DERIVATIVES All of the city's debt is fixed rate and the city is not party to any interest rate swaps or other derivative agreements. PENSIONS AND OPEB The city has a manageable employee pension burden, based on unfunded liabilities for its share of the Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS), an agent multiple-employer plan administered by the state. Moody's fiscal 2016 adjusted net pension liability (ANPL) for the city, under our methodology for adjusting reported pension data, is $4.9 million or.76 times operating revenues. The three year average of the city's ANPL to operating revenues is 0.69 times and the three year average of ANPL to assessed valuation is a manageable 0.96%. Moody's ANPL reflects certain adjustments we make to improve comparability of reported pension liabilities. The adjustments are not intended to replace the city's reported liability information, but to improve comparability with other rated entities. For more information on Moody's insights on employee pensions and the related credit impact on companies, government, and other entities across the globe, please visit Moody's on Pensions at www.moodys.com/pensions. Management and Governance The city's management is strong, implementing and maintaining fund balance policies to help maintain the city's strong financial position. Texas cities have an institutional framework score of Aa, or strong. Cities rely on stable property taxes for 30% -40% of their operating revenues, while 25%-35% comes from economically sensitive sales taxes, resulting in moderate predictability overall. Cities maintain moderate flexibility under the state-mandated cap ($25 per $1,000 of AV, with no more than $15 for debt) to raise property taxes as most cities are well below the cap. Expenditures primarily consist of personnel costs, which are highly predictable. Cities have high flexibility to reduce expenditures given no union presence. Legal Security The certificates are payable from ad valorem taxes to be levied, within the limits prescribed by law, on all taxable property within the city. The certificates are additionally secured by a limited subordinate pledge of surplus net revenues derived from the city's water and sewer system, not to exceed $10,000. 3

Use of Proceeds Bond proceeds will be used to expand the city's wastewater treatment plant. Obligor Profile The City of Sanger is a primarily residential community located on Interstate 35 in Denton County. The city is located approximately 40 miles north of Dallas and has an estimated population of 7,747. Methodology The principal methodology used in this rating was US Local Government General Obligation Debt published in December 2016. Please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology. Ratings Exhibit 2 Sanger (City of) TX Issue Combination Tax and Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 2017 Rating Type Sale Amount Expected Sale Date Rating Description Rating A1 Underlying LT $9,320,000 04/28/2017 General Obligation Limited Tax Source: Moody's Investors Service 4

2017 Moody s Corporation, Moody s Investors Service, Inc., Moody s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, MOODY S ). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES ( MIS ) ARE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody s publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody s Corporation ( MCO ), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading Investor Relations Corporate Governance Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy. Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY S affiliate, Moody s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to wholesale clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a wholesale client and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to retail clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. ( MJKK ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody s SF Japan K.K. ( MSFJ ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ( NRSRO ). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. REPORT NUMBER 5 1068318

Contacts Alex Rawlings Analyst alex.rawlings@moodys.com 6 CLIENT SERVICES +1 (214) 979-6841 John Nichols AVP - Analyst john.nichols@moodys.com 214-979-6851 Americas 1-212-553-1653 Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 Japan 81-3-5408-4100 EMEA 44-20-7772-5454