Status Update. Donna M. Mueller, CEO IOWA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

Similar documents
A Legislator s Guide. to Iowa Public Employees Retirement System. Important Information for IPERS Plan Sponsors

Iowa Public Employees Retirement System Economic Assumptions Review

Retirement Plan Design Study

February 3, Experience Study Judges Retirement Fund

Pension Funding & Plan Design

IOWA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

GASB STATEMENT NO. 67 REPORT

Taking a Look Under the Hood of your Defined Benefit Plan Actuarial Mechanics

Actuarial SECTION. A Tradition of Service

MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN APPENDIX TO THE ANNUAL ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT DECEMBER 31, 2016

June 19, Compute the City s recommended contribution rate for the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 2015.

GASB STATEMENT NO. 67 REPORT

IPERS Actuarial Assumptions and Methods 2015

Purchasing IPERS service as a Special Service member

SUCCESS STRATEGIES. for Well-Funded Pension Plans

South Dakota Retirement System

MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN ANNUAL ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT DECEMBER 31, 2015 FRASER, CITY OF (5003)

Vested Members. Iowa Public Employees Retirement System. For Vested IPERS Members Regular Members

Governance. Legislature Plan Sponsor. Governor Plan Sponsor. IPERS Administration. Investment Board Fund Trustee. Benefits Advisory Committee

IOWA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association

O A K L A N D C O U N T Y E M P L O Y E E S ' R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M

PERS Overview Senate Committee on Workforce

ACTUARIAL & STATISTICAL SECTION

Actuarial Basics. Presented by Mike Overley, Regional Manager Tony Radjenovich, Regional Manager

GASB STATEMENT NO. 68 REPORT

IOWA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

CITY OF DELANO EMPLOYEE PENSION PLAN (A Pension Trust Fund of the City of Delano) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. Year Ended June 30, 2015

GASB STATEMENT NO. 67 REPORT

City of Brockton Contributory Retirement System

About IPERS. Iowa Public Employees Retirement System. The Rewards of IPERS Membership

CITY OF WINTER GARDEN PENSION PLAN FOR FIREFIGHTERS AND POLICE OFFICERS SECTION , FLORIDA STATUTES COMPLIANCE

General Employees Retirement Plan

Kansas Public Employees

Lessons Learned From The Pension Crises

Office of Legislative Auditor

Teachers Retirement Association of Minnesota

Municipal Fire & Police Retirement System of Iowa

ACTUARIAL. 123 Solvency Test 124 Analysis of Financial Experience 124 Schedule of Funding Progress

Q&A IPERS law changes. The changes described in this summary are the result of a 2010 Iowa law (House File 2518).

City of Harrisburg Police Pension Plan

Actuarial Note Transmittal

Federal Employees Retirement System: Budget and Trust Fund Issues

ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, City of Plantation Police Officers Retirement System

MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN ANNUAL ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT DECEMBER 31, 2016 SPRINGFIELD, CITY OF (1303)

In addressing some possible viable options and recommendations, the Pension Subcommittee has prepared a presentation enumerates a number of basic fina

ST. CLAIR COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

TOWN OF LANTANA POLICE RELIEF AND PENSION FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2014

Iowa Public Employees Retirement System. Economic Assumptions Study

FIREMEN'S RELIEF AND RETIREMENT FUND A FIDUCIARY FUND OF THE CITY OF HARLINGEN, TEXAS. September 30, 2014 and 2013

July 31, The Board of Trustees City of Pontiac General Employees Retirement System Pontiac, Michigan

State Universities Retirement System of Illinois. Actuarial Valuation Report as of June 30, 2018

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZES THE ADOPTION OF A PENSION FUNDING POLICY FOR THE DELAWARE RIVER AND BAY AUTHORITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN

I. Types of Retirement Plans

Federal Employees Retirement System: Budget and Trust Fund Issues

Pension De-Risking. 112 th Annual Conference May 6-9, 2018 St. Louis, Missouri

REPORT ON THE JANUARY 1, 2012 ACTUARIAL VALUATION OF THE BELMONT CONTRIBUTORY RETIREMENT SYSTEM

The Water and Power Employees Retirement Plan of the City of Los Angeles ACTUARIAL EXPERIENCE STUDY

Re: BR 427 SB 1 AA Statement 1 of 4 KERS Hazardous, CERS Hazardous, and SPRS Retirement Systems

Proposed Plan Changes April 21, Thomas Pfeifle Executive Director

Federal Employees Retirement System: Budget and Trust Fund Issues

Teachers Retirement Association of Minnesota A Pension Trust Fund of the State of Minnesota. Actuarial

Actuarial Section. Actuarial Section THE BOTTOM LINE. The average MSEP retirement benefit is $15,609 per year.

Experience Study 1. How does MERS ensure plans are sustainable? 2. Why does MERS conduct an Experience Study every 5 years?

KLAMATH COUNTY EMPLOYEES' PENSION PLAN

COUNTY OF VOLUSIA VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS PENSION SYSTEM

PENSION PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF KLAMATH COUNTY

Report on a Possible New Plan Design for the Shelby County Retirement System

Lycoming County Employees Retirement System

CITY OF HAINES CITY GENERAL EMPLOYEES' PENSION PLAN SECTION , FLORIDA STATUTES COMPLIANCE

Benefit Provisions and Valuation Data. 1-3 Summary of Benefit Provisions 4-6 Retired Life Data 7-9 Active Member Data Asset Information

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO ANNUAL PENSIONS AND OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT OBLIGATIONS DISCLOSURE. As of June 21, 2017

Public Pension Resource Guide

Learning About NYSTRS

The Impact of Recent Pension Reforms on Teacher Benefits: A Case Study of California Teachers

Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement System 2007 INVESTIGATION OF EXPERIENCE For the period July 1, 2003 to June 30, 2007

Please find enclosed the annual disclosures that satisfy the October 1, 2014 financial reporting requirements made under Section

City of Albany Police and Fire Relief or Pension Fund

June 2, 2016 City #00048

SOUTH BURLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN. ACTUARIAL VALUATION as of October 1, 2015

City of Marine City Retirement

Purchasing Service. Maximizing Your IPERS Benefits

PART III. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT BOARD

WELCOME TO PENSION SERVICES GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Please find enclosed the annual disclosures that satisfy the October 1, 2014 financial reporting requirements made under Section

KALAMAZOO COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

TRS UPDATE /13/12

Federal Employees Retirement System: Budget and Trust Fund Issues

Federal Employees Retirement System: Budget and Trust Fund Issues

Somewhere. Cash Balance Plans. in the Middle

City of Madison Heights Police and Fire Retirement System Actuarial Valuation Report June 30, 2017

MERS Retirement Plan Basics. Presented by Sue Feinberg, Regional Manager John Waugh, Senior Benefit Plan Advisor

San Joaquin County Employees Retirement Association

General Employees Retirement Plan

Compute the City s recommended contribution rate for the Fiscal Year beginning December 1, 2015.

City of Marine City Retirement

TRA Funding Policy (adopted by TRA Board of Trustees on 9/16/15)

San Diego City Employees Retirement System. Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2013 for the San Diego Unified Port District. Produced by Cheiron

Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund. Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, Copyright 2004

San Joaquin County Employees Retirement Association

Transcription:

Status Update Donna M. Mueller, CEO IOWA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM Presented July 25, 2017

IPERS History 101 Established in 1953, to: Attract and retain a quality workforce Provide secure retirement with lifetime benefit payments 2

Core Elements of Public Plans Mandatory participation Pooled investment risk Pooled longevity risk Employer/employee cost-sharing Lifetime annuity Benefit adequacy Commitment to fully fund the plan 3

How Does It Work? Pooled risk investments & demographics Contributions from active members and employers are paid in. The IPERS Trust Fund Lifetime retirement benefits, disability benefits, death benefits, and refunds are paid out. The IPERS Trust Fund must be used for the exclusive benefit of members and their beneficiaries. 4

The Funding Equation The key to secure funding for any pension system is managing to this equation. 5

Common Contributors to UAL The Reason Foundation IPERS Experience Intentional Underfunding Poor Management and Bad Decisions Overgenerous Benefit The Great Recession Yes, contributions for Regular members were intentionally underfunded for over 10 years. No, IPERS uses sound, actuarial assumptions; is transparent, and notified plan sponsor early. Yes, benefit enhancements were enacted for Regular members without funding. No, not applicable to IPERS. No cost-of-living adjustment in plan design. Yes, unavoidable. No one was protected from the recession. 6

IPERS Shortfall $5.6 billion UAL resulted from: Over a decade of insufficient contributions Two recessions 2001 and 2009 Updated mortality tables 7

Case Study Within IPERS 8

Investment Performance History Annualized Returns 1-Year 2.15% 10-Year 6.31% 20-Year 7.85% 30-Year 8.64% For periods ending June 30, 2016 *Actuarial Assumed Investment Return 1977 1993 6.50% 1994 1995 6.75% 1996 2016 7.50% 9

Regular Membership 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% Historical Contribution Rates Fiscal Year Employee Rate Employer Rate Actuarial Contribution Rate 10

Pension Reform in 2010 Shared Risk Plan Applied to Active Members Contribution Rates Changed from statutory static rate to actuarially determined rate shared by employees and employers Benefit Formula Salary averaged over 5 years; down from 3 Early Retirement Reduction Increased from 3 percent per year to 6 percent reduction per year Vesting Changed from age 55 to age 65; and from 4 years of service to 7 years of service 11

Funding Discipline Established Contribution Rate Funding Policy Moved from 30-year open to a 30-year closed amortization Annual gains or losses amortized over layered 20-year closed periods Contribution rates set based on actuarially-determined rate No rate reduction until 95 percent funded and rate is 50 basis points greater than actuarial rate, then can be lowered 50 basis points No offset against normal cost until three consecutive years of 110 percent funded Prepares for the next downturn 12

Purpose of Experience Study Provides basis for analyzing existing assumptions and developing recommended changes Actuary s role is to make recommendations for each assumption As fiduciaries, the Board is responsible for the selection of actuarial assumptions Board can adopt all, none, or some of actuary s recommendations Assumptions do not affect the true cost of the plan which is the actual benefit payments paid from the trust 13

Actuarial Standards of Practice Issued by the Actuarial Standards Board Binding on credentialed actuaries Assumptions must be appropriate for their intended use Must not give undue weight to recent experience Best estimate is required not overly aggressive or conservative IPERS is an ongoing retirement system with a long time horizon (50+ years), so assumptions must reflect this 14

Economic Assumptions The Building Block Method Investment Return Individual Salary Increases Wage Inflation Real Rate of Return Merit Scale Productivity Productivity Inflation Inflation Inflation Note: inflation assumption and productivity must be consistent in all assumptions. 15

IPERS Updated Assumptions Inflation assumption lowered from 3.0 percent to 2.6 percent Balance recent experience, historical patterns, future expectations Investment return assumption lowered from 7.50 percent to 7.0 percent Reflects lower inflation assumption Reflects IPERS portfolio allocation Reflects the middle of expected returns Wage growth assumption lowered from 4.0 percent to 3.25 percent Used to project future member pay for benefit amounts Used to project future payroll for funding amounts 16

Considerations in Setting Assumptions Periodic incremental changes Regular experience studies provide opportunity to adjust Can move part way now and more later if justified Balance allocation of costs to generations Too optimistic shifts current costs to future Too pessimistic shifts future costs to present Since members pay 40%-50% of cost, this is important 17

Reason s Definition of Success The Reason Foundation Says Make full pension payments and pay down debt ASAP. IPERS Stop deferring payment or using unrealistic investment return assumptions to artificially lower contribution rates. Allow workers to accrue benefits that are portable and devoid of perverse incentives, and protect taxpayers from unnecessary cost risks. Make benefits competitive, increase contributions, set realistic retirement ages, implement anti-spiking rules. Depoliticize management of pension funds and increase transparency and accountability. 18

Contact Us The purpose of this presentation is to provide an update on IPERS. For additional information, feel free to contact us or visit our website at www.ipers.org E-mail: ceo@ipers.org Phone: 515-281-0070 Toll-free: 800-622-3849 19