Practical Issues in Capital Budgeting

Similar documents
Chapter 7. Net Present Value and Other Investment Rules

CHAPTER 11. Topics. Cash Flow Estimation and Risk Analysis. Estimating cash flows: Relevant cash flows Working capital treatment

Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news

Sample Questions for Chapters 10 & 11

FINANCE & ACCOUNTING FEASIBILITY STUDIES: PREPARATION, ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION NON-TECHNICAL & CERTIFIED TRAINING COURSE

Seminar on Financial Management for Engineers. Institute of Engineers Pakistan (IEP)

WHAT IS CAPITAL BUDGETING?

Net Present Value Q: Suppose we can invest $50 today & receive $60 later today. What is our increase in value? Net Present Value Suppose we can invest

CHAPTER 11. Proposed Project Data. Topics. Cash Flow Estimation and Risk Analysis. Estimating cash flows:

Chapter 8. Ross, Westerfield and Jordan, ECF 4 th ed 2004 Solutions

CA. Sonali Jagath Prasad ACA, ACMA, CGMA, B.Com.

INVESTMENT CRITERIA. Net Present Value (NPV)

Investment Decision Criteria. Principles Applied in This Chapter. Learning Objectives

CHAPTER 9 NET PRESENT VALUE AND OTHER INVESTMENT CRITERIA

What is it? Measure of from project. The Investment Rule: Accept projects with NPV and accept highest NPV first

Disclaimer: This resource package is for studying purposes only EDUCATION

Chapter 10 The Basics of Capital Budgeting: Evaluating Cash Flows ANSWERS TO SELECTED END-OF-CHAPTER QUESTIONS

Chapter 9 Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria. Net Present Value (NPV) Net Present Value (NPV) Konan Chan. Financial Management, Fall 2018

CAPITAL BUDGETING. John D. Stowe, CFA Athens, Ohio, U.S.A. Jacques R. Gagné, CFA Quebec City, Quebec, Canada

A First Encounter with Capital Budgeting Rules

Investment Decision Criteria. Principles Applied in This Chapter. Disney s Capital Budgeting Decision

Types of investment decisions: 1) Independent projects Projects that, if accepted or rejects, will not affect the cash flows of another project

Chapter 8 Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria Good Decision Criteria

Capital Budgeting, Part I

Capital Budgeting, Part I

Capital Budgeting Process and Techniques 93. Chapter 7: Capital Budgeting Process and Techniques

Corporate Financial Management

The formula for the net present value is: 1. NPV. 2. NPV = CF 0 + CF 1 (1+ r) n + CF 2 (1+ r) n

Capital Budgeting: Decision Criteria

ch11 Student: 3. An analysis of what happens to the estimate of net present value when only one variable is changed is called analysis.

Tools and Techniques for Economic/Financial Analysis of Projects

J ohn D. S towe, CFA. CFA Institute Charlottesville, Virginia. J acques R. G agn é, CFA

Investment Appraisal. Chapter 3 Investments: Spot and Derivative Markets

Lecture Guide. Sample Pages Follow. for Timothy Gallagher s Financial Management 7e Principles and Practice

Prioritization of Climate Change Adaptation Options. The Role of Cost-Benefit Analysis. Session 8: Conducting CBA Step 7

Capital Budgeting CFA Exam Level-I Corporate Finance Module Dr. Bulent Aybar

What s next? Chapter 7. Topic Overview. Net Present Value & Other Investment Criteria

Session 02. Investment Decisions

FEEDBACK TUTORIAL LETTER

SCAF Workshop Integrated Cost and Schedule Risk Analysis. Tuesday 15th November 2016 The BAWA Centre, Filton, Bristol

Closure on Cash Flows

CAPITAL BUDGETING TECHNIQUES (CHAPTER 9)

Chapter 9. Capital Budgeting Decision Models

Software Economics. Introduction to Business Case Analysis. Session 2

Chapter 11: Capital Budgeting: Decision Criteria

WEEK 7 Investment Appraisal -1

Real Options. Katharina Lewellen Finance Theory II April 28, 2003

Finance 303 Financial Management Review Notes for Final. Chapters 11&12

University 18 Lessons Financial Management. Unit 2: Capital Budgeting Decisions

Software Economics. Introduction to Business Case Analysis. Session 2

POPULAR IBC TOPICS Notes on Lecture 4: Paying Cash vs. IBC. Robert P. Murphy July, 2015

PAPER 7 : FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

CAPITAL BUDGETING Shenandoah Furniture, Inc.

The Complete Course On Budgeting: Planning, Forecasting, What If Analysis And Reporting

Overview. Overview. Chapter 19 9/24/2015. Centre Point: Reversion Sale Price

Chapter 7: Investment Decision Rules

Global Financial Management

Midterm Review. P resent value = P V =

The Use of Modern Capital Budgeting Techniques. Howard Lawrence

Topic 2: Define Key Inputs and Input-to-Output Logic

Chapter. Capital Budgeting Techniques: Certainty and Risk. Across the Disciplines Why This Chapter Matters to You LEARNING GOALS

Breaking out G&A Costs into fixed and variable components: A simple example

CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW

MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS Circle the correct answer on this test paper and record it on the computer answer sheet.

Capital Budgeting Theory and Capital Budgeting Practice. University of Texas at El Paso. Pierre C. Ehe MBA

Lecture 6 Capital Budgeting Decision

Week 1 FINC $260,000 $106,680 $118,200 $89,400 $116,720. Capital Budgeting Analysis

John and Margaret Boomer

Overview. Overview. Chapter 19 2/25/2016. Centre Point Office Building. Centre Point: Reversion Sale Price

MBF1223 Financial Management Prepared by Dr Khairul Anuar

10. Estimate the MIRR for the project described in Problem 8. Does it change your decision on accepting this project?

JEM034 Corporate Finance Winter Semester 2017/2018

Chapter 14 Solutions Solution 14.1


The Basics of Capital Budgeting

An Introduction to Resampled Efficiency

Chapter 11 Cash Flow Estimation and Risk Analysis ANSWERS TO END-OF-CHAPTER QUESTIONS

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education Canada

Topic 1 (Week 1): Capital Budgeting

Essential Learning for CTP Candidates TEXPO Conference 2017 Session #02

Discussion Questions

Date: July 18, 2010 Max Marks: 60 Max Time: 3 Hours. Discuss a Project Development Cycle in detail.

Chapter Organization. Net present value (NPV) is the difference between an investment s market value and its cost.

Study Session 11 Corporate Finance

The NPV profile and IRR PITFALLS OF IRR. Years Cash flow Discount rate 10% NPV 472,27 IRR 11,6% NPV

Asset Valuation Models Capital Budgeting Criteria Problem Set Boise State EMBA Byers

(2) shareholders incur costs to monitor the managers and constrain their actions.

Index Terms - Capital Budgeting Techniques, Financial Development, Investment Opportunities, Sophistication Level.

Introduction to Discounted Cash Flow

Topics in Corporate Finance. Chapter 2: Valuing Real Assets. Albert Banal-Estanol

Financial planning. Kirt C. Butler Department of Finance Broad College of Business Michigan State University February 3, 2015

John and Margaret Boomer

Dr. Ebadati Kharazmi University

Essential Learning for CTP Candidates Carolinas Cash Adventure 2018 Session #CTP-04

Capital Budgeting Decision Methods

Homework #3 Suggested Solutions

Chapter 10: Making Capital Investment Decisions. Faculty of Business Administration Lakehead University Spring 2003 May 21, 2003

SOLAR POWER PROJECT ECONOMICS

Investment Decision Criteria In Small New Zealand Businesses

CHARTERED LEVEL C2 - Strategic Management Accounting

Transcription:

Practical Issues in Capital Budgeting Note 9 Outline NPV or IRR? The case of multiple IRRs Scale Issue Coping with Uncertainty Capital Rationing Capital Budgeting Practices 1 I. NPV vs. IRR NPV or IRR? NPV and IRR will generally give us the same decision Exceptions: the two can give different answers under following situations. Non-conventional cash flows cash flow signs change more than once Mutually exclusive projects Initial investments are substantially different Timing of cash flows is substantially different 2 3 1

IRR and Non-conventional Cash Flows Example (non-conventional cash flow) When the cash flows change sign more than once, there is more than one IRR If you have more than one IRR, which one do you use to make your decision? Suppose an investment will cost $90,000 initially and will generate the following cash flows: Year 1: 132,000 Year 2: 100,000 Year 3: -150,000 The required return is 15%. Should we accept or reject the project? 4 5 NPV Profile IRR = 10.11% and 42.66% IRR and Mutually Exclusive Projects Mutually exclusive projects If you choose one, you can t choose the other Intuitively you would use the following decision rules: NPV choose the project with the higher NPV IRR choose the project with the higher IRR 6 7 2

Example: Why IRR doesn t work? Example: Why IRR doesn t work? Suppose you consider two investments, which are mutually exclusive and non-duplicative. Which is the better investment? Project A: Invest $100 in time 1 and get $300 in time 2. Project B: Invest $1,000 in time 1 and get $2,000 in time 2. Project A Percent Return Dollar Return Your answer depends on whether you use percentage returns or dollar returns. Project B 8 9 Another Example :Mutually Exclusive Projects NPV Profiles Period Project A Project B 0-500 -400 1 325 325 2 325 200 IRR 19.43% 22.17% NPV 64.05 60.74 The required return for both projects is 10%. Which project should you accept and why? IRR for A = 19.43% IRR for B = 22.17% Crossover Point = 11.8% Required Rate = 10% 10 11 3

Conflicts Between NPV and IRR Then, What about Profitability Index? NPV directly measures the increase in value to the firm Whenever there is a conflict between NPV and another decision rule, you should always use NPV Profitability index may also lead to incorrect decisions in comparisons of mutually exclusive investments (due to the same reason for the Internal Rate of Return method). IRR is unreliable in the following situations Non-conventional cash flows Mutually exclusive projects 12 13 Evaluating NPV Estimates II. Coping with Uncertainty Suppose we have an NPV that is positive. Are we ready to go? NPV estimates are just that (point) estimates 14 A positive NPV is a good start now we need to take a closer look Forecasting risk how sensitive is our NPV to changes in the cash flow estimates; the more sensitive, the greater the forecasting risk Sources of value why does this project create value? 4

Sources of Value Scenario and Sensitivity Analysis In applying the NPV technique, it is always useful to ask: Where does the positive NPV in capital budgeting come from? Some examples how firms create positive NPV. Introduce new ideas and products Apple Corporation Create barrier to entry Microsoft Create product differentiation Mercedes Benz Low (logistics) costs Walmart What happens to the NPV under different cash flow scenarios? At the very least look at: Best case high revenues, low costs Worst case low revenues, high costs Measure of the range of possible outcomes Best case and worst case are not necessarily probable, but they can still be possible 16 Scenario Analysis Sensitivity Analysis Conventional NPV Analysis based only on most probably projections Scenario Net Income Cash Flow NPV IRR Base case 19,800 59,800 15,567 15.1% An analysis that considers other scenarios Scenario Net Income Cash Flow NPV IRR Base case 19,800 59,800 15,567 15.1% Worst Case -15,510 24,490-111,719-14.4% What happens to NPV when we vary one variable at a time This is a subset of scenario analysis where we are looking at the effect of specific variables on NPV The greater the volatility in NPV in relation to a specific variable, the larger the forecasting risk associated with that variable, and the more attention we want to pay to its estimation Best Case 59,730 99,730 159,504 40.9% 5

Sensitivity Analysis for New Project Simulation Analysis Scenario Unit Sales Cash Flow NPV IRR Base case 6000 59,800 15,567 15.1% Worst case 5500 53,200-8,226 10.3% Best case 6500 66,400 39,357 19.7% Simulation is really just an expanded sensitivity and scenario analysis Monte Carlo simulation can estimate thousands of possible outcomes based on conditional probability distributions and constraints for each of the variables The output is a probability distribution for NPV with an estimate of the probability of obtaining a positive net present value The simulation only works as well as the information that is entered and very bad decisions can be made if care is not taken to analyze the interaction between variables Making A Decision Beware Paralysis of Analysis Too much of something is bad At some point you have to make a decision If the majority of your scenarios have positive NPVs, then you can feel reasonably comfortable about accepting the project If you have a crucial variable that leads to a negative NPV with a small change in the estimates, then you may want to forego the project III. Capital Rationing 23 6

Special Cases(2): Capital Rationing Capital rationing occurs when a firm or division has limited resources Soft rationing the limited resources are temporary, often self-imposed Hard rationing capital will never be available for this project The profitability index is a useful tool when a manager is faced with soft rationing Large LNG projects like the ones proposed for B.C. require capital investments in the $40 billion to $50 billion range. Faced with weak oil prices and shrinking revenue, there are fears that companies like Petronas and Shell (NYSE:RDB.B) will postpone their investments in B.C. and wait for a recovery in oil prices. The big challenge is the capital rationing that is going on in the industry because the broader oil and gas industry is in distress, Hemmingsen said. 25 Capital Rationing: Steps Example: The management of ZYX Corp. set a ceiling in this year s capital expenditures at $300,000. All of the following six investment projects are available for investments for ZYX. Which one(s) should ZYX accept? Step. 1: Estimate the profitability index of each investment project in consideration Step 2: If PI<0 for an investment, then exclude it Step 3: Sort the investments that survived in step 2 by PI (from largest to smallest) Step 4: Accept investments starting from the one with the highest PI until there is no more investment capital left Investment Initial Cost PV(Future CF) A 50,000 40,000 B 80,000 105,000 C 40,000 80,000 D 80,000 95,000 E 100,000 150,000 F 50,000 55,000 26 27 7

Capital Rationing: Example Capital Rationing: Example PV(Future Investment Initial Cost NPV PI CF) A 50,000 40,000-10,000 0.80 B 80,000 105,000 25,000 1.31 C 40,000 80,000 40,000 2.00 D 80,000 95,000 15,000 1.19 E 100,000 150,000 50,000 1.50 F 50,000 55,000 5,000 1.10 Project Initial Cost PV (Future CF) NPV PI Cum. Capital Invested Cum. NPV C 40,000 80,000 40,000 2.00 40,000 40,000 E 100,000 150,000 50,000 1.50 140,000 90,000 B 80,000 105,000 25,000 1.31 220,000 115,000 D 80,000 95,000 15,000 1.19 300,000 130,000 F 50,000 55,000 5,000 1.10 350,000 135,000 A 50,000 40,000-10,000 0.80 400,000 125,000 28 29 IV. Capital Budgeting Practices Capital Budgeting In Practice We should consider several investment criteria when making decisions NPV and IRR are the most commonly used primary investment criteria But should be well aware of the pitfalls of the IRR. Payback is a commonly used secondary investment criteria 30 31 8

Example: Capital Budgeting in Practice Example: Capital Budgeting in Practice Using a 10% discount rate for an initial 15 yearmine life and a copper price of $1.20 per pound, the feasibility study demonstrates a Net Present Value ("NPV") of $89 million and a robust Internal Rate of Return ("IRR") of 17%, with a payback period of 6.6 years. Using copper prices of $2.00/lb and $3.00/lb, the NPVs increase to $527 million and $1,075 million respectively and the IRRs increase significantly to 46% and 76% respectively. 32 33 Capital Budgeting Practices of Fortune 1000 Journal of Business and Management Vol. 8 (2002) Capital Budgeting Practices of Fortune 1000 CEOs use multiple capital budgeting tools NPV and IRR dominate the other rules Usage Frequency NPV > IRR >>> PB > DPB >> PI > ARR > MIRR Investment Size and Capital Budgeting Tools NPV is used for investments of all sizes. But it is always the way to go particularly for large-scale investments PB is popular with small scale investments PI is used more for mid size investments 34 35 9

P 의원 " 경부운하보고서는정치공작용 " H 당의원 6 명건교부방문 [ 연합뉴스 ] 2007 년 08 월 02 일 ( 목 ) ( 서울 = 연합뉴스 ) H 당공작정치저지범국민투쟁위원회는 2 일건설교통부를방문, 경부운하재검토보고서를작성한것은 L 전서울시장측을음해하려는의도가있다고주장했다. 그러나 1998 년국토연구원의보고서는 " 화물물동량과투입공사비를기준으로경부노선전체의경제성을검토한결과노선전체로는 NPV( 순현재가치 ), B/C( 비용편익비율 ) 등에서타당성이없는것으로판단된다 " 고돼있는것으로확인됐다. Gyeongbu Channel (Seoul Busan) Discount Rate Cost-Benefit Analysis PV (Future Benefits) Costs NPV (unit: million won) B/C (PI) 8% 1,341,786 1,415,026-73,239 0.948 10% 1,056,318 1,140,172-83,854 0.926 12% 845,756 930,778-85,022 0.906 1998 Korea Water Resources Corporation 37 Garbage In. Garbage Out. 38 10