UNION MEMBERSHIP AND COVERAGE FILES FROM THE CURRENT POPULATION SURVEYS: NOTE

Similar documents
State-Level Estimates of Union Density, 1964 to Present

Unions and Upward Mobility for Women Workers

Effects of the Oregon Minimum Wage Increase

The Employment Impact of a Comprehensive Living Wage Law

The Union Wage Advantage for Low-Wage Workers

Labor Market Conditions in Ohio Versus the Rest of the United States:

Unionization Trends in Ohio and the U.S.

Effects of the 1998 California Minimum Wage Increase

TECHNICAL APPENDIX AND REFERENCES FOR $15.00 MINIMUM WAGE PETITION

BLS Spotlight on Statistics: Self-Employment in the United States

Union Relative Wage Effects in the USA and the

The Unions of the States

Match Bias in Wage Gap Estimates Due to Earnings Imputation

Worker Participation in Employer-Sponsored Pensions: A Fact Sheet

EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS

The State of Working America 12th Edition

EBRI Databook on Employee Benefits Appendix D: Explanation of Sources

Since the first seasonally adjusted

E APPENDIX METHODOLOGY FOR LAND USE PROJECTIONS IN THE BOSTON REGION INTRODUCTION

Union Relative Wage Effects in the United States and the United Kingdom

CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND POLICY RESEARCH. Union Membership Byte 2018

THE COST COUNTING. The Impact of an $8.25 New Jersey Minimum Wage on State and Local Government. William Even Miami University

THE UNION DIFFERENCE FOR WORKING FAMILIES

Union Advantage for Black Workers

U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics October Third quarter 2000 averages for household survey data

American Finance Association

Women in the Labor Force: A Databook

Unions and Upward Mobility for Asian American and Pacific Islander Workers

EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS

BLS Spotlight on Statistics: BLS 125th Anniversary

EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS

For Immediate Release

This paper examines the effects of tax

Teacher Salaries, State Collective Bargaining Laws, and Union Coverage

Aaron Sojourner & Jose Pacas December Abstract:

Introduction to Current Population Survey (CPS) Hsueh-Sheng Wu Center for Family and Demographic Research November 14, 2016

The Changing Distribution of Pension Coverage*

Labor Unions: Membership, Wages, Competition, and Performance in the Private and Public Sectors

AN ADDITIONAL MEASURE OF THE HAMILTON PROJECT S JOBS GAP ANALYSIS by Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach and David Boddy The Hamilton Project

Appendices, Methods and Full Tables for: The Under-Reporting of Transfers in Household Surveys: Its Nature and Consequences

Employment from the BLS household and payroll surveys: summary of recent trends

EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS

EMPLOYER COSTS FOR EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION JUNE 2010

Value of a Statistical Life: Relative Position vs. Relative Age

The Effect of Market Power on the Fringe Benefit Share of Labor Compensation

1969. Median. Introduction

Income and resource provisions

Digitized for FRASER Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

EMPLOYMENT COST INDEX MARCH 2011

Household Income Trends: November 2011

Coverage Non-coverage Longitudinal? No Data is collected on a quarterly basis

2004 annual averages for national establishment data. Introdudiorl of new metropolitan areas and divisions. In ffi/s issue:

Economic Overview Capital District

AARP WORKFORCE PROFILES:

Women in the Labor Force: A Databook

New Jersey Public-Private Sector Wage Differentials: 1970 to William M. Rodgers III. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development

Current Population Survey, February 1997: Contingent Work Supplement

Household Income Trends: February 2012

THE HAMILTON PROJECT S JOBS GAP ANALYSIS: AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE By Brad Hershbein and Melissa S. Kearney The Hamilton Project

The Effects of the Proposed Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Increase

2013 HMDA Survey and Case Study

The Truth about Public Employees in California: They are Neither Overpaid nor Overcompensated

THE EMPLOYMENT SITUATION: SEPTEMBER 2000

Older Workers: Employment and Retirement Trends

Sample Design Considerations for the Occupational Requirements Survey

PSID Technical Report. Construction and Evaluation of the 2009 Longitudinal Individual and Family Weights. June 21, 2011

Economic Indicators For Manufacturing Executives

Household Income Trends: August 2012 Issued September 2012

Notes On Weights, Produced by Knowledge Networks, Amended by the Stanford Research Team, Applicable to Version 2.0 of the data.

Economic Overview Loudoun County, Virginia. October 23, 2017

A Profile of Unionization in Chicago, in Illinois, and in the United States. September Frank Manzo IV, M.P.P. Illinois Economic Policy Institute

CFPB Consumer Laws and Regulations

EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS

Economic Overview Fairfax / Falls Church. October 23, 2017

COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

THE EMPLOYMENT SITUATION: MAY 2002

People Who Are Not in the Labor Force: Why Aren't They Working?

Employment from the BLS household and payroll surveys: summary of recent trends

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at

TECHNICAL APPENDIX FOR THE STATE OF PRIVATE PENSIONS: CURRENT 5500 DATA

Tentative Lessons from the Recent Disinflationary Effort

Economic Overview New York

Women in the Labor Force: A Databook

FIGURE I.1 / Per Capita Gross Domestic Product and Unemployment Rates. Year

Are Unions Pro-Labor?*

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

What Explains Wage Differences between Union Members and Covered Nonmembers?

Employment Equity in Southern States: Detailed Methodology

AARP WORKFORCE PROFILES:

Economic Overview. Lawrence, KS MSA

Transmission of material in this release is embargoed until 8:30 a.m. (EDT) Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Technical information: Household data: (202) USDL

The Economic Base of San Miguel County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University

NCHELP CommonLine Network for FFELP And Alternative Loans. Disbursement Roster File/ Disbursement Roster Acknowledgment File

Economic Overview Long Island

Fragile Families Labor Market and Macroeconomic Restricted Use Data Appendage

Women in the Labor Force: A Databook

ECONOMIC OVERVIEW DuPage County, Illinois

Evaluating the BLS Labor Force projections to 2000

EBRI Databook on Employee Benefits Chapter 6: Employment-Based Retirement Plan Participation

Transcription:

Union Membership and Coverage Files from the Current Population Surveys: Note Author(s): Barry T. Hirsch and David A. Macpherson Reviewed work(s): Source: Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 46, No. 3 (Apr., 1993), pp. 574-578 Published by: Cornell University, School of Industrial & Labor Relations Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2524554. Accessed: 19/04/2012 18:25 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at. http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. Cornell University, School of Industrial & Labor Relations is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Industrial and Labor Relations Review. http://www.jstor.org

UNION MEMBERSHIP AND COVERAGE FILES FROM THE CURRENT POPULATION SURVEYS: NOTE BARRY T. HIRSCH and DAVID A. MACPHERSON* This note informs readers about the availability of disaggregated annual unionization data compiled from the Current Population Surveys (CPS). Union membership, membership density, and contract coverage density are calculated for employed civilian wage and salary workers from the monthly CPS for January 1983 through December 1991. Workers are classified by demographic and labor market characteristics, industry, occupation, state, metropolitan area, and state-by-industry. The union membership and coverage files described in the note are available from the authors, without charge, in machine-readable form. TN this note we describe union membership and coverage files we have compiled from the Current Population Surveys (CPS) and report how readers can obtain copies of these data. Beginning in January 1983, the CPS, conducted by the Bureau of the Census, adopted new industry and occupation codes and began collecting information each month on union membership and contract coverage. We have compiled annual union membership, membership density, and contract coverage density figures from the January 1983 through December 1991 CPS * Barry Hirsch is Professor of Economics and David Macpherson is Associate Professor of Economics, both at the Florida State University-Tallahassee. They thank Ron Tucker and Greg Weyland of the Bureau of the Census for kindly answering their many questions about the CPS. The authors will provide the union membership and coverage files described in this paper free of charge, in ASCII format, either by transmission over Internet or on diskette via mail. The authors can be reached by mail at the Department of Economics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-2045, or at the following Internet addresses: BHIRSCH@COSS.FSU.EDU or DMACPHER@COSS.FSU.EDU. monthly surveys, disaggregated by industry, occupation, state, metropolitan area, and state-by-industry group. Such information is provided neither by the Bureau of the Census nor by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.' The union membership and coverage files described in this note are available from the authors on request. Moreover, we expect to continue updating the files and to make future updates available. Data from the Current Population Surveys have been the primary basis for estimates of union density for detailed industries, occupations, states, and metropolitan areas. Union density typically has been measured as the percentage of employed wage and salary workers who are union members or are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. Freeman and Medoff (1979) provided union mem- 1 As noted below, the union membership and coverage files expand on and update data previously made available by Curme, Hirsch, and Macpherson (1990). The new files were developed following requests from researchers, government agencies, news media, and others. The BLS does not provide disaggregated union data. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 46, No. 3 (April 1993). ( by Cornell University. 0019-7939/93/4603 $01.00 574

UNION MEMBERSHIP AND COVERAGE FILES 575 bership density figures for private sector workers based on the combined 1973-75 May CPS. Kokkelenberg and Sockell (1985) calculated membership densities among all wage and salary workers as three-year moving averages (along with some annual estimates) for May 1973-75 through May 1979-81. Curme, Hirsch, and Macpherson (1990) utilized the May or May/June CPS tapes for 1983-85, and all monthly CPS surveys for the years 1986-88. They presented both union membership and contract coverage densities, provided area density figures separately for private- and public-sector workers, provided union density estimates for industries and occupations using 1980 Census of Population codes (adopted by the CPS in 1983), and provided data for newly defined metropolitan areas (MSA/ CMSA's) for 1986-88. These three studies have provided a valuable database for industrial and labor relations research. Union Membership and Coverage Files: Description The union membership and coverage files summarized in this note provide a substantial extension and update of the study by Curme, Hirsch, and Macpherson (CHM). CHM utilized the monthly CPS surveys for 1986-88. We provide annual estimates from the monthly CPS surveys back to 1983, and forward through 1991. The 1983 estimates are particularly valuable because disaggregated union membership data are not widely available for the early 1980s, a period of particularly important changes. (Kokkelenberg and Sockell end their study with 1980, measured by the average of the May samples for 1979-81.) In addition to figures made available by CHM, we include data on union membership as well as membership and contract coverage densities. We also include figures on unionization at a state-by-industry level (22 major industries cross-classified by the 50 states and the District of Columbia) that can be readily matched to alternative industry-by-region units of analysis employed in empirical studies. Our estimates differ from CHM's and those of previous studies by the exclusion of 14-15-year-olds. Because these new figures include only those workers ages 16 and over, they are exactly comparable to the economywide figures provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics in Employment and Earnings (January issues), and they follow the standard convention used by the government in defining the labor force, which is restricted to persons age 16 and over.2 Union density estimates are based on calculations from the monthly Current Population Surveys (CPS), household surveys conducted by the Bureau of the Census.3 Households are in the sample for four months, followed by eight months out of the sample, followed by an additional four months in the sample. A supplementary survey containing questions on union membership status is asked of wage and salary workers in the outgoing rotation groups (groups 4 and 8). Our sample of workers includes all employed civilian wage and salary workers, ages 16 and over, in the outgoing rotation groups of the CPS from January 1983 through 2 The BLS publishes data for a few highly aggregated categories based on demographic group, public/private status, and major occupation and industry groups (Employment and Earnings, January issues), but does not provide more disaggregated figures. The only difference of which we are aware between BLS aggregate figures and our own relate to public/private status. The BLS provides breakdowns by private and public sector for wage and salary workers in nonagricultural employment, but not for workers in agricultural employment. In our figures (economywide and by state and metropolitan area), private and public figures are calculated for all wage and salary workers, including those in agriculture. 3 Technical documentation on the CPS is available in the codebooks that accompany CPS public use tapes. Documentation and public use tapes can be purchased from the Customer Services Branch, Data User Services Division, Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C. 20233 (301-763-4100), and are also available through the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) at the University of Michigan. The annual "microdata files" (or "outgoing rotation group" files) containing monthly union information from January 1983 forward are not public use tapes. They are made available by the Data Services Group at the Bureau of Labor Statistics, accompanied by a record layout of the files (BLS Microdata File, Record Layout).

576 INDUSTRIAL AND LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW December 1991. Sample sizes (OBS) by year are provided in Table 1. Membership and contract coverage information is based on responses to two survey questions that remained constant throughout the period. Individuals are counted as union members if they respond yes to the question, "On this job, is... a member of a labor union or of an employee association similar to a union?" Those who answer no to that union membership question are then asked, "On this job, is... covered by a union or employee association contract?" Workers are counted as covered if they are union members or if they are nonunion but covered by a union contract.4 Membership and contract coverage den- sities, MEM and cov respectively, which measure the percentages of employed wage and salary workers who are union members or are covered by a union contract, respectively, are calculated as follows: (1) DENj = (Iibij Ij I Ei WO 100. DEN. represent the percentage of union members or workers covered by a contract in group j, where j is, say, industry, occupation, state, or metropolitan area; bi, is a binary variable equal to 1 if worker i is a union member (or covered); and W. is the sampling weight assigned by the CPS to worker i, based on the number of similar workers expected to be found in the labor force. Note that self-employed workers and military personnel are not included in the calculations; thus, union densities as calculated here and elsewhere overstate the extent of unionization among all employed workers. Union membership, MEMBERSHIP1, for groupj is defined as (2) MEMBERSHIPj = ijwij 12, the sum of the weights over the year for union members in groupj, divided by 12 (since 12 monthly surveys are used). Table 1 provides information on union 4 Union status is recorded for all workers. The Census Bureau assigns responses for individuals unable to provide answers (approximately 2%), based on characteristicsuch as industry, occupation, age, race, and gender. membership (MEMBERSHIP), membership density (MEM), contract coverage density (cov), and CPS sample sizes (OBS) for employed civilian wage and salary workers, ages 16 and over. Data are for 1983-91 and are classified based on private and public sector status. Union membership declined during this period from 17.7 million in 1983 to 16.6 million in 1991. Private sector membership declined from 12.0 to 9.9 million over the period, whereas public sector membership increased from 5.7 to 6.6 million. By 1991, union membership and contract coverage densities in the private sector were 11.7% and 12.9%, respectively, as compared to 36.9% and 43.3% in the public sector. The purpose of this note is to inform readers of the availability of union membership and coverage files containing data identical to those in Table 1 for detailed industries, detailed occupations, states, states-by-industries, SMSAs, and MSA/ CMSAs. For each classification and year, information for 1983-91 (unless otherwise noted) is available for the following: CPS sample size (OBS), union membership (MEMBERSHIP), membership density (MEM), and contract coverage density (cov). The number of workers covered by contracts can be approximated by MEMBERSHIP (COV/MEM), and the number of employed wage and salary workers can be approximated by (MEMBERSHIP/MEM) -100. The files described in Table 2 are provided in machine-readable form, on request, without charge.5 Conclusion We have used CPS surveys from January 1983 through December 1991 to compile detailed union membership, membership density, and contract coverage density figures for industries, occupations, states, metropolitan areas, and states-by-industries, as well as for workers based on demographic and labor market characteristics. 5 Alternative files containing employment figures can be provided on request.

UNION MEMBERSHIP AND COVERAGE FILES 577 Table 1. Union Membership, Membership Density, and Contract Coverage Density, 1983-1991. Year Sample OBS MEMBERSHIP MEM COV 1991: All workers 179,560 16,568,443 16.12 18.23 Private sector 147,112 9,936,480 11.72 12.90 Public sector 32,448 6,631,963 36.86 43.33 1990: All workers 185,030 16,739,812 16.11 18.34 Private sector 152,197 10,254,800 11.91 13.20 Public sector 32,833 6,485,012 36.47 43.25 1989: All workers 176,411 16,960,452 16.39 18.55 Private sector 145,372 10,536,230 12.25 13.47 Public sector 31,039 6,424,222 36.73 43.53 1988: All workers 173,118 17,001,665 16.77 18.97 Private sector 142,409 10,702,439 12.71 13.96 Public sector 30,709 6,299,226 36.64 43.54 1987: All workers 180,434 16,913,064 17.03 19.18 Private sector 148,698 10,857,316 13.17 14.42 Public sector 31,736 6,055,748 35.91 42.49 1986: All Workers 179,147 16,975,180 17.52 19.89 Private sector 147,678 11,084,659 13.77 15.16 Public sector 31,469 5,890,521 35.94 43.16 1985: All workers 180,232 16,996,101 17.98 20.48 Private sector 148,185 11,252,959 14.34 15.85 Public sector 32,047 5,743,142 35.74 43.06 1984: All workers 177,248 17,339,763 18.81 21.62 Private sector 145,104 11,684,046 15.30 17.01 Public sector 32,144 5,655,717 35.72 43.87 1983: All workers 173,932 17,717,379 20.07 23.26 Private sector 141,311 11,980,183 16.49 18.47 Public sector 32,621 5,737,196 36.70 45.49 Source: The Current Population Survey Microdata Files, January 1983 through December 1991. The sample consists of employed civilian wage and salary workers, ages 16 and above. OBS is the CPS sample size, MEMBERSHIP is estimated union membership of the group (the sum of the union member sample weights/12), MEM is the union membership density, and cov is the contract coverage density. MEMBERSHIP, MEM, and cov are further defined in the text. Designation SUMMARY.TAB Table 2. Union Membership and Coverage Files, 1983-1991. Description Membership and Coverage, 1983-91. Three summary tables with economywide data by class of worker, demographic group, major industry, and major occupation. IND3.A 1 Membership and Coverage by Detailed Industry, 1983-91. Data for 231 three-digit Census of Population industries. OCCUP3.A_2 Membership and Coverage by Detailed Occupation, 1983-91. Data for 503 three-digit Census of Population occupations. STATE.A 3 Membership and Coverage by State for All Workers, Private Sector Workers, and Public Sector Workers, 1983-91. Data for 50 states and the District of Columbia. SMSA.A_4 MSA.A 5 Membership and Coverage by SMSA for All Workers, Private Sector Workers, and Public Sector Workers, 1983-84 and 1/85-6/85. Data for 44 Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas. Membership and Coverage by MSA/CMSA for All Workers, Private Sector Workers, and Public Sector Workers, 10/85-12/85 and 1986-91. Data for 202 Metropolitan Statistical Areas and Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas. STATEIND.A_6 Membership and Coverage by Major Industry by State, 1983-91. Data for 1,122 state-by-industry categories (22 major industries times 50 states plus D.C.).

578 INDUSTRIAL AND LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW REFERENCES Curme, Michael A., Barry T. Hirsch, and David A. Macpherson. 1990. "Union Membership and Contract Coverage in the United States, 1983-1988." Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 44, No. 1 (October), pp. 5-33. Freeman, Richard B., and James L. Medoff. 1979. "New Estimates of Private Sector Unionism in the United States." Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 32, No. 2 (January), pp. 143-74. Kokkelenberg, Edward C., and Donna R. Sockell. 1985. "Union Membership in the United States, 1973-1981." Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 38, No. 4 (July), pp. 497-543. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Annual. Employment and Earnings. Washington, D.C.: GPO, January. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Annual, 1983-91. BLS Microdata File, Record Layout. Washington, D.C.: Data Services Group.