Generated for: OKOTOKS. Financial Indicator Graphs

Similar documents
Generated for: COCHRANE. Financial Indicator Graphs

Generated for: ROCKY VIEW COUNTY. Financial Indicator Graphs

Generated for: LACOMBE COUNTY. Financial Indicator Graphs

Generated for: FLAGSTAFF COUNTY. Financial Indicator Graphs

Generated for: BARRHEAD. Financial Indicator Graphs

Generated for: ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOUSE

Generated for: FLAGSTAFF COUNTY

BUDGET. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT business attraction business support small business and entrepreneur programs

Financial Indicator Graphs for the Year Ended December 31, 2009

Town of Drayton Valley

How the Current Slowdown is Affecting Alberta s Municipalities September Update

Financial Indicator Graphs for the Year Ended December 31, Prepared by Financial Advisory Services Local Government Services Division

Entrepreneurs Deserve Property Tax Fairness

Approved Operating and Capital Budget January 2, 2007

MORTGAGE LENDING GUIDELINES 2013

STANDING COMMITTEE ON FINANCE AGENDA REPORT

NAIOP. Capital Region Non-Residential Tax Report

Athabasca Grande Prairie. Banff - Jasper - Rocky Mountain House. Edmonton. Calgary

Decision ATCO Gas North. Amendment to Rider B with respect to the Hamlet of Entwistle. December 24, 2009

2018/2019 Maximum Municipal Library Board Operating Grants

ALBERTA LABOUR FORCE PROFILES Aboriginal People in the Labour Force Alberta Labour Force Profiles

ATCO GAS AND PIPELINES LTD. ATCO GAS NORTH RATE SCHEDULES. January 1, 2019

PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABILITY:

Provincial and National Employment, Alberta and Canada Employment Rates 1, % 62.7% 62.7% 63.0% 63.5%

Thank you for the opportunity to share some information about the challenges faced by Alberta s municipalities and the opportunities to help them

2008 ANNUAL ALBERTA LABOUR MARKET REVIEW

WHY EDMONTON? DISCOVER THE GATEWAY TO THE NORTH

PUBLICATIONS. Volume 12:5 February 2019 SHOULD ALBERTA ADOPT A LAND TRANSFER TAX? Bev Dahlby and Braeden Larson

Alberta's Economic Outlook

Housing and Urban Affairs

Consolidated Statement of Change in Net Financial Assets (Net Debt)

2004 Annual Alberta Regional Labour Market Review

Governance Department

2017 Annual Alberta Regional Labour Market Review

To establish the framework by which fees relating to various City programs, services, goods and requirements are set by the City Manager.

Annual. Labour. Market. Alberta. Review

SPRUCE GROVE Demographic Report 2016

Vulcan County 2017 ANNUAL OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET

2012 Annual Alberta Labour Market Review

Alberta Labour Market Outlook

Schedule 53: Consolidated Statement of Change in Net Financial Assets (Net Debt) and Tangible Capital Asset Acquisition Financing/Donations

Annual Alberta Labour Market Review

2017 Annual Alberta Labour Market Review

FortisAlberta Inc. Municipal Franchise Fee Amendment for 12 Municipalities January 1, 2018 Proceeding 23152

Condensed Unconsolidated Financial Statements of. The City of Spruce Grove

FortisAlberta Inc. Municipal Franchise Fee Amendments for Two Municipalities - July 1, 2018 Proceeding 23583

Condensed Unconsolidated Financial Statements of. The City of Spruce Grove

Economic Cycles Continue Economic Update Sherwood Park & District Chamber. of Commerce. January 21, 2015

Economic Spotlight June 20, 2009

ANNUAL REPORT. of the Chief Electoral Officer. The Election Finances and Contributions Disclosure Act. elections.ab.ca

Estimating Earning Capacity: Making Reasonable Efforts to Support a Job Search

Housing Bulletin Monthly Report

Research November 2014

COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES

Research September 2015

2011 Financial report

CU INC ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM

Budget 2016 Questions from AUMA

COUNCIL BUDGET COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA

December Alberta and Strathcona are predicting:

48 HOURS IN EDMONTON. October 2014

SECTION 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 SECTION 2: INTRODUCTION 8 SECTION 3: METHODOLOGY 10

Alberta Health Services Annual Report CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MARCH 31, 2017

2015 Council Remuneration Review

Management's Discussion & Analysis

Waste Management Services Audit September 29, 2011

Court of Queen s Bench

CITY OF PENTICTON UTILITY RATE REVIEW

June Monthly Economic Review

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TOWN OF MORINVILLE MORINVILLE, ALBERTA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER

Click to insert title. Standard and Poor s. Credit Rating Review April 18,

Municipal Government Act Review

VILLAGE OF CREMONA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORT. December 31, 2014

Corporate Presentation. 3rd Quarter 2016

Consolidated Financial Statements of. The City of Spruce Grove

Linen Services in AHS

Nunavut Municipal Performance Measurement Program

CWC WELL SERVICES CORP. RELEASES RECORD YEAR END AND FOURTH QUARTER 2011 FINANCIAL RESULTS

aspire to own AVEO PROGRAM GUIDE General Guidelines Bankruptcy & Consumer Proposal Min 600 Beacon Rental Properties

TOTAL NUMBER OF MUNICIPALITIES

Consolidated Financial Statements of. The City of Spruce Grove

VILLAGE OF CREMONA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORT. December 31, 2015

WAPITI REGIONAL LIBRARY

FISCAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGY. Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo Maintaining the Foundation for Today and the Future.

MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

Court of Queen s Bench

ALBERTA BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS

2015 Edmonton and Region Household Travel Survey

Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act Report

Strathcona Update. May 14, 2014

CANADIAN UTILITIES LIMITED 2013 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM

APPENDIX C CAPITAL BUDGET OVERVIEW. Page 36

Court of Queen s Bench

Recommendation THAT Council approve the recommendations contained in the 2014 Council Remuneration Review report.

Community Economic Development: Keys to Success

Annual Report

City of Lacombe Consolidated Financial Statements For the year ended December 31, 2017

Decision Town of Millet. Franchise Agreement with FortisAlberta Inc. and Amendment to Municipal Franchise Fee Rider.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION Fort McMurray Allowance (FMA)

Transcription:

Generated for: 2015 Financial Indicator Graphs

Introduction The financial indicator graphs are intended to serve as a tool that may assist council and administration with operational decisions. The comparative measures may be useful in assessing past performance and for budget planning. Each municipality is compared to a group of similar size urban municipalities, or to rural municipalities with similar tax base. The comparison group is shown on the last slide. Custom graphs can be created comparing your municipality to other Alberta municipalities. Financial Advisory Services is available to assist you in interpreting the information contained in the graphs. Please be aware that advisors will not have access to any of the custom graphs you create, but would still be able to assist with the underlying formulas and data used to create all graphs. It should be noted that that the financial indicator graphs are point-in-time documents. The system is updated daily as new information is added to the municipal financial database. As such graphs will reflect the current data set and the results will be subject to change as the database is updated and verified. However, most information from the previous reporting year will have been posted by the fall of the subsequent year. Other points to note are: - The range for most of the graphs is 2010 to 2015. - Caution should be used when interpreting results as each municipality has unique characteristics affecting how it compares to the group. Also, circumstances may have changed since the December 31, 2015 reporting date.

Introduction Financial Indicator Graphs include: o Equalized Tax Rates - Municipal/Residential/Non-Residential o Equalized Assessment Per Capita o Non-Residential Equalized Assessment as % of Total o Tax Collection Rate o Debt & Debt Service as % of the Limits o Long Term Debt Per Capita o Major Revenue Sources Per Capita o Major Revenue Sources As % of Total Revenue (only 2015) o Broad Function Expenses Per Capita (only 2015) o Per Capita Expenses by Major Type: - Salaries, Wages & Benefits - Contracted & General Services - Materials, Goods, Supplies & Utilities - Bank Charges & Interest - Amortization o Net Book Value As % of Capital Costs o Accumulated Surplus Categories, As % (only 2015) o Accumulated Surplus Categories, Per Capita (only 2015) o Ratio of Current Assets to Current Liabilities

Equalized Tax Rates: Net Municipal 12 2010 4.8% 6.0% 10 2011 4.5% 5.8% 2012 4.8% 6.1% 2013 4.9% 6.4% 2014 5.1% 6.7% 8 2015 5.3% 6.8% 6 4.8 4.5 4.8 4.9 5.1 5.3 4 Note: Municipal Equalized Tax Rate is calculated based on total equalized assessment and net municipal property tax. Page 1

Equalized Tax Rates: Residential 14 12 2010 7.1% 7.8% 2011 6.7% 7.7% 2012 7.5% 8.1% 2013 7.5% 8.3% 10 2014 7.5% 8.2% 2015 7.6% 8.0% 8 7.1 6.7 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.6 6 Note: Residential Equalized Tax Rate is calculated based on gross residential property taxes and residential equalized assessment. Page 2

Equalized Tax Rates: Non-Residential 20 2010 7.8% 12.3% 15 2011 8.9% 12.3% 2012 7.6% 12.5% 2013 10.0% 12.0% 10 7.8 8.9 7.6 10.0 10.2 10.8 2014 10.2% 12.1% 2015 10.8% 11.5% 5 0 Note: Non-Residential Equalized Tax Rate is calculated based on gross non-residential property taxes and non-residential equalized assessment Page 3

Total Equalized Assessment Per Capita 250,000 200,000 179,432 2010 179,432 154,731 2011 151,989 144,141 2012 162,978 145,366 2013 157,565 146,541 2014 156,162 150,167 2015 159,973 157,334 150,000 151,989 162,978 157,565 156,162 159,973 100,000 Note: Equalized Assessment Per Capita approximates a municipality's ability to generate property tax revenue in comparison to similar municipalities Page 4

Non-Residential Assessment as % of Total Equalized Assessment 50 40 2010 12.8% 16.8% 2011 12.9% 17.8% 2012 13.5% 17.6% 30 2013 13.4% 18.5% 2014 13.9% 19.0% 2015 14.7% 18.9% 20 12.8 12.9 13.5 13.4 13.9 14.7 10 0 Page 5

Tax Collection Rates 100 95.6 95.7 95.9 96.1 97.0 96.5 2010 95.6% 96.0% 2011 95.7% 96.7% 2012 95.9% 97.6% 90 2013 96.1% 97.6% 2014 97.0% 97.9% 2015 96.5% 97.5% 80 70 Note: This indicator reflects the percentage of taxes and grants in place of taxes which are collected by the municipality in the year in which they are levied. Page 6

Percent of Debt Limit Used 80 60 50.1 51.1 2010 50.1% 37.7% 2011 42.6% 34.2% 2012 51.1% 33.7% 2013 42.5% 33.0% 40 42.6 42.5 2014 30.5% 32.9% 2015 28.0% 33.4% 30.5 28.0 20 Note: 0 This graph shows, in percentage terms, the municipality's debt as a percentage of the regulated limit. This is compared to the median for the group of similar municipalities. Page 7

Percent of Debt Service Limit Used 50 40 40.1 36.1 39.3 35.2 2010 40.1% 29.0% 2011 36.1% 26.8% 2012 39.3% 24.5% 30 28.0 28.5 2013 35.2% 22.3% 2014 28.0% 21.4% 2015 28.5% 23.1% 20 10 Note: This graph shows, in percentage terms, the municipality's current debt servicing requirement relative to the regulated limit. This is compared to the median for the group of similar municipalities. Page 8

Long Term Municipal Debt Per Capita 4,000 2010 1,205 1,100 2011 1,065 1,065 3,000 2012 1,278 1,278 2013 1,118 1,243 2014 972 1,118 2015 842 1,357 2,000 1,000 1,205 1,065 1,278 1,118 972 842 0 Page 9

Revenue Sources Per Capita: Net Municipal Property Taxes 1,500 2010 726 933 2011 737 975 2012 750 963 2013 758 1,002 2014 814 1,078 2015 889 1,100 1,000 726 737 750 758 814 889 500 Page 10

Revenue Sources Per Capita: Total Grants 1,000 804 2010 804 495 2011 370 481 2012 367 441 2013 435 479 500 370 367 435 362 395 2014 362 490 2015 395 449 0 Page 11

Revenue Sources Per Capita: Sales and User Charges 5,000 4,000 2010 485 568 2011 493 615 3,000 2012 478 630 2013 586 664 2014 804 740 2015 693 725 2,000 1,000 485 493 478 586 804 693 0 Page 12

Major Revenue Sources As % of Total Revenue, 2015 60 59 Group Group Maximum 53 40 38 30 29 23 24 20 17 12 0 Net Municipal Property Tax Total Grants Sales and User Charges Page 13

Major Expenditures Per Capita by Broad Function, 2015 Group 6,398 Group Maximum 6,000 4,000 2,547 2,000 1,819 1,391 0 980 865 746 802 581 254 358 277 360 439 309 405 460 508 General Government Protective Services Transportation Environment Recreation Total Page 14

Major Expenditures Per Capita by Type: Salaries, Wages and Benefits 2,000 2010 588 820 2011 594 865 1,500 2012 581 875 2013 589 882 2014 622 931 2015 647 940 1,000 588 594 581 589 622 647 500 Page 15

Major Expenditures Per Capita by Type: Contracted and General Services 1,000 800 2010 337 401 2011 416 417 2012 364 397 2013 491 481 600 491 587 508 2014 587 514 2015 508 524 400 337 416 364 200 Page 16

Major Expenditures Per Capita by Type: Materials, Goods, Supplies and Utilities 1,000 2010 177 235 2011 181 230 2012 194 223 2013 180 241 2014 191 298 500 2015 199 307 177 181 194 180 191 199 0 Page 17

Major Expenditures Per Capita by Type: Interest and Banking 200 150 2010 60 62 2011 58 61 2012 55 59 2013 53 54 100 2014 47 47 2015 41 53 60 58 55 53 50 47 41 0 Page 18

Major Expenditures Per Capita by Type: Amortization of Tangible Capital Assets 1,500 2010 267 317 2011 293 336 2012 296 339 1,000 2013 288 355 2014 295 388 2015 297 393 500 267 293 296 288 295 297 Page 19

Net Book Value as % of Total Capital Property Costs 90 83.9 83.0 82.5 82.0 80 79.9 78.8 2010 83.9% 74.0% 2011 83.0% 73.8% 70 2012 82.5% 73.7% 2013 82.0% 73.4% 2014 79.9% 72.9% 2015 78.8% 72.1% 60 50 40 Page 20

Accumulated Surplus Categories as % of Total, 2015 100 98 Group Group Maximum 87 87 80 60 40 34 20 22 11 11 0 2 2 Unrestricted Restricted Equity in TCA Page 21

Accumulated Surplus Per Capita, 2015 25,000 23,639 Group Group Maximum 21,754 20,000 15,000 13,224 12,740 15,106 11,137 10,000 5,000 3,434 4,594 0 1,407 1,623 196 262 Unrestricted Restricted Equity in TCA Total Page 22

Ratio of Current Assets to Liabilities Assets 50,000,000 44,933,833 Liabilities Ratio 40,000,000 38,836,209 30,000,000 20,000,000 35,134,947 1.63 21,529,951 1.90 33,212,831 17,437,683 1.79 25,032,229 29,829,936 1.62 18,468,196 1.50 25,825,661 32,686,766 27,370,074 1.19 10,000,000 Note: 0 The current ratio calculation measures ability to meet short-term obligations with existing liquid assets. "Current Assets" are those which are liquid in nature (cash or an asset which can be easily converted to cash). Inventory is excluded from the calculation. "Current Liabilities" are generally obligations coming due within the next fiscal year. The ratio is shown in the centre of the column. A ratio greater than one indicates the degree to which current assets exceed current liabilities; a ratio smaller Page 23

Equalized Assessment Per Capita RED DEER LETHBRIDGE GRANDE PRAIRIE ST. ALBERT MEDICINE HAT AIRDRIE SPRUCE GROVE LEDUC FORT SASKATCHEWAN COCHRANE LLOYDMINSTER CHESTERMERE CAMROSE BEAUMONT STONY PLAIN COLD LAKE SYLVAN LAKE 124,296 133,560 152,413 156,880 168,354 148,644 157,789 174,171 159,973 151,422 172,627 141,711 149,716 158,640 156,799 166,834 191,715 232,930 150,000 200,000 Page 24

Group Population RED DEER LETHBRIDGE GRANDE PRAIRIE ST. ALBERT MEDICINE HAT AIRDRIE SPRUCE GROVE LEDUC FORT SASKATCHEWAN COCHRANE LLOYDMINSTER CHESTERMERE CAMROSE BEAUMONT STONY PLAIN COLD LAKE SYLVAN LAKE 32,036 29,304 28,016 24,040 23,084 19,740 18,496 18,038 16,768 16,127 15,736 14,310 68,556 63,255 63,018 58,690 94,804 100,807 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 Page 25