Active Microcap - A Private Equity Alternative

Similar documents
The Next Big Thing Could Be Really Small:

The Current Rationale for Micro Cap Securities in an Equity Portfolio. May 2014

Adding Micro-Caps to Small-Caps: Unlock the potential to enhance return and lower risk

Identifying a defensive strategy

Lazard Insights. Interpreting Active Share. Summary. Erianna Khusainova, CFA, Senior Vice President, Portfolio Analyst

Can Active Management Make a Comeback? September 2015

Alternative Investments Building Blocks

ISHARES MSCI GERMANY ETF (EWG)

Investment Insights. Market Periods For Active Investment Management

INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENT & FIDUCIARY SERVICES: Investment Basics: Is Active Management Still Worth the Fees? By Joseph N. Stevens, CFA INTRODUCTION

Defensive Short Duration High Yield Bonds An Overlooked and Underutilized Source of Durable Alpha

The benefits of core-satellite investing

Microcaps: Value Uncovered. DGHM & Co., LLC May 2016

ROGER MONTGOMERY. Inside The Montgomery Fund Returns Whitepaper by Scott Phillips, Head of Distribution

Active vs. Passive Money Management

Retirement Plans Investment Policy

Active management can add big value in small-cap equities

Active vs. Passive Money Management

INTERNATIONAL EQUITIES: FLEXIBLE APPROACHES ALIGN WITH DC PLAN SIMPLIFICATION

TEACHERS RETIREMENT BOARD. INVESTMENT COMMITTEE Item Number: 14 CONSENT: ATTACHMENT(S): 1. DATE OF MEETING: February 3, 2016 / 20 mins.

Building Efficient Hedge Fund Portfolios August 2017

VANECK VECTORS BIOTECH ETF (BBH)

Active vs. Passive Money Management

Global Investing DIVERSIFYING INTERNATIONAL EQUITY ALLOCATIONS WITH SMALL-CAP STOCKS

The Case for Micro-Cap Equities. Originally Published January 2011

Private Investments - A Potential Alternative to Frothy Public Markets. January 22, 2018

A case for microcap investing: Investors might be missing out on a potentially beneficial segment of the market cap spectrum

AMERICAN INVESTMENT COUNCIL. Performance Update 2017 Q1

Market Volatility & SGA s Active Returns By Pat Holway, CFA, CAIA, CIC & Steve Skatrud, CFA Client Portfolio Managers

Dynamic Smart Beta Investing Relative Risk Control and Tactical Bets, Making the Most of Smart Betas

ELC Advisors, LLC. Efficient Low Cost Wealth Management

Schroders Global Equity Solutions for Defined Contribution

The University of Puget Sound Investment Policy Statement For Pooled Endowment Investments

RBC GAM Fundamental Series RBC Global Asset Management

AMERICAN INVESTMENT COUNCIL. Performance Update 2017 Q3

Addition Through Subtraction: Thinking Strategically About Managing Tax Liabilities

Benefit from a new fiduciary approach

INVESTING IN MICROCAPS

For professional investors only. Understanding Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs)

Advisor Briefing Why Alternatives?

The Power of Mid-Caps: Investing in a Sweet Spot of the Market

Volatility reduction: How minimum variance indexes work

Minimum Variance and Tracking Error: Combining Absolute and Relative Risk in a Single Strategy

ISHARES NASDAQ BIOTECHNOLOGY ETF (IBB)

2013 CFA Exam. LOS 31.a SS 13

Lazard Insights. Growth: An Underappreciated Factor. What Is an Investment Factor? Summary. Does the Growth Factor Matter?

Micro-Cap Investing. Expanding the Opportunity Set. Expanding the Investment Opportunity Set

THE BOUTIQUE ADVANTAGE. By Michael Kretschmann & Nick Hamilton

Deconstructing Dividends: Five Reasons to Consider Small- and Mid-Cap Dividend-Paying Stocks

DIVERSIFIED EQUITY FUND REVIEW

Statement of Investment Objectives Exhibit A: Michigan State University s Common Investment Fund

Passive Investing: Theory vs. Practice. Oliver Murray Brandes Investment Partners & Co.

2016 Review. U.S. Value Equity EQ (Gross) +16.0% -5.0% +14.2% +60.7% +19.7% -0.2% +25.2% +80.0% %

Investment Insight. Are Risk Parity Managers Risk Parity (Continued) Summary Results of the Style Analysis

DIVERSIFIED EQUITY FUND REVIEW

Factor Mixology: Blending Factor Strategies to Improve Consistency

Implementing Portable Alpha Strategies in Institutional Portfolios

VANGUARD HIGH DIVIDEND YIELD ETF (VYM)

by Joseph Harvey President and Chief Investment Officer

US PE / VC Benchmark Commentary Quarter Ending March 31, 2017

FTSE Diversified Factor Indexes

2018 Summary Prospectus

Back to the Future Why Portfolio Construction with Risk Budgeting is Back in Vogue

Microcap as an Alternative to Private Equity

Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. Reports Quarter and Year Ended December 31, 2017 Results

Alternative Investments in a Changing World

Incorporating Factor Strategies into a Style- Investing Framework

AMERICAN INVESTMENT COUNCIL. Performance Update 2018 Q1

Product Disclosure Statement RESPONSIBLE ENTITY

Get active with Vanguard factor ETFs

Rogers AI Global Macro ETF

Portfolio construction: The case for small caps. by David Wanis, Senior Portfolio Manager, Smaller Companies

Evolving Equity Investing: Delivering Long-Term Returns in Short-Tempered Markets

AMERICAN INVESTMENT COUNCIL. Performance Update 2017 Q4

Sarah Riley Saving or Investing. April 17, 2017 Page 1 of 11, see disclaimer on final page

U.S. Equities LONG-TERM BENEFITS OF THE T. ROWE PRICE APPROACH TO ACTIVE MANAGEMENT

Risk: N/A Zacks ETF Rank N/A - BIB Sector Weights. Price Chart

Q data reveal toughest active manager climate since report s inception:

INSIGHTS. The Factor Landscape. August rocaton.com. 2017, Rocaton Investment Advisors, LLC

UTILITIES SELECT SECTOR SPDR FUND (XLU)

P-Cubed: Pathstone Portfolio Platform

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICY FOR THE CONSOLIDATED ENDOWMENT FUND

Getting Smart About Beta

Convertible Bonds: A Tool for More Efficient Portfolios

INSIGHT. The case for micro caps. Newsletter. Why micro caps? Early-stage investment opportunities. A research deficit

Destinations INVESTOR GUIDE. Multi-asset class solutions to meet a range of investor needs. Dynamic portfolios constructed from mutual funds

MARTIN CURRIE AUSTRALIA MICROCAP

PE: Where has it been? Where is it now? Where is it going?

Demystifying the Role of Alternative Investments in a Diversified Investment Portfolio

Cover Headline Here (Title Case) The Power of Focus:

Small Cap Value Composite GIPS Table

Investment Selection A focus on Alternatives. Mary Cahill & Ciara Connolly

Equity Portfolio Management Strategies

LISANTI SMALL CAP GROWTH FUND (the Fund ) (formerly known as the Dinosaur Lisanti Small Cap Growth Fund)

Why Managed Futures? Vittorio Faillace

Video: GIC Wealth Management Perspectives

Using Exchange Traded Funds

Equities: Enhancing the Core/Satellite Framework

Multi-Balanced Model: Your Questions Answered

THE U.S. MIDDLE MARKET

Transcription:

Active Microcap - A Private Equity Alternative Date: Fourth Quarter 2013 In an era of budgetary setbacks and increased funding requirements, more plan sponsors have been attracted to private equity s historically high absolute returns as a means of alleviating funding challenges. We think that plan sponsors may be overlooking similar promise and potential in active Microcap equities. Active Microcap is a reasonable liquid proxy for private equity The high returns that private equity has offered come with some points of caution, particularly the uncertainty around committed but uncalled capital, and the level of illiquidity. We believe that active Microcap offers an investment experience similar to private equity, while avoiding these drawbacks. Historically, active Microcap has had excellent long-term returns that rival private equity returns (Cambridge Associates private equity benchmark) and beat passive benchmarks, both large and small. As we have noted in Exhibit 1, on a longer-term basis, active Microcap investors have outperformed private equity as well as the passive indexes. Additionally, the return patterns of active Microcap managers tend to be highly correlated to those of private equity managers due to the similar characteristics of companies that Microcap and private equity managers seek. Exhibit 1: Public vs. Private Equity Returns (through 6/30/2013) 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 25 Years Passive Large Passive Small Passive Micro Active Micro Private Equity Source: Acuitas, Cambridge Associates, Russell Investments, evestment Alliance *The inception of the Russell Microcap Index is 2001. Passive Micro/Small Cap uses the Russell 2000 Index for periods prior to 2001.

Active Microcap investors seek private equity characteristics Active Microcap investing shares many of the features and advantages of private equity. Like private equity, an active Microcap product can offer a concentrated, high-conviction portfolio from an inefficient, minimally researched pool of companies with great return potential. At the same time, it gives the end investor a level of liquidity, transparency, flexibility, and accessibility that private equity is unable to. The reason for active Microcap s similarity to private equity is that the investment managers naturally tend to buy similar companies. Most notably, private equity managers target small, niche companies similar to those found in Microcap. Indeed, Microcap stocks are a large source of private equity investments. Roughly 8% of the Russell Microcap index was acquired, via buyout or merger, between 6/30/2010 and 5/31/2011. Beyond capitalization, Microcap and private equity investors share many beliefs about what makes an attractive investment. Active Microcap managers as a group tend to favor strong cash generation, limited leverage, stable business fundamentals; all characteristics that private equity investors favor as well. Many stocks active Microcap managers target also tend to be cheap on the valuation metrics that private equity GPs use to value companies, such as EV/EBITDA. Microcap investors benefit from greater liquidity On the liquidity continuum, Microcap sits somewhere between very liquid large cap stocks and very illiquid private equity investments. Some of the return similarities could be attributed to the expected liquidity premiums in private equity and Microcap. However, in our experience, the liquidity benefit from Microcap is significant relative to private equity. In fact, the long-term returns of private equity do not show a return premium commensurate with the illiquidity of the investment as the asset class has underperformed active Microcap. With active Microcap, there are traditionally no lockup periods and the level of transparency into the underlying portfolio is significantly greater. Microcap is a sensible choice for uncalled capital The liquidity of Microcap makes it a flexible investment that can serve as a long-term strategic allocation or a short-term proxy. In a recent paper on Microcap, Allianz suggests that (depending on a plan s ability to meet capital calls in the event of a decline) due to the lengthy vesting period [of private equity], a sensible choice may be to temporarily invest idle, committed but not called capital in a micro-cap strategy. We concur with this assessment. For plans that desire a similar return pattern to private equity with the benefit of greater liquidity, Microcap makes a reasonable temporary investment. Of course investors must assess their ability to meet capital calls in the event of a decline in the market. But since capital can sit idle for long periods of time, active Microcap provides the best proxy for private equity returns and keeps the investor s asset allocation closest to its target. 2

Microcap and private equity tend to move together In the chart below (Exhibit 2) we have demonstrated that the investments trend in the same direction and enjoy similar periods of difficulty and success. The primary differences between the two return series are a function of peaks and valleys. This apparent lower volatility of the private equity returns is misleading, as it can be partially explained by the infrequent and stale pricing in the asset class. Importantly, while private equity doesn t experience the same level of volatility as Microcap, the returns are still highly correlated. Exhibit 2: Quarterly Returns of Private Equity vs. Active Small/Micro (1991 to 2Q 2013) 40 30 20 10 0-10 -20-30 -40 Cambridge Private Equity Active Microcap Source: Acuitas, Cambridge Associates, Russell Investments, evestment Alliance Active Growth Microcap is a strong proxy for venture capital. Even more than buyout-oriented private equity, the limited capacity and opportunities makes venture capital an area where investors have difficulty accessing strong partners. The correlation matrix below (Exhibit 3) shows that active management in Microcap Growth offers a superior proxy for venture capital than does passive investing in either small or large cap. This is a result of the characteristics of both Microcap 3

Growth stocks and active management in microcap. Microcap growth stocks are the most similar to early-stage venture capital investments, and active growth managers in microcap seek the growth and valuation characteristics as we highlighted earlier. The result is that the return patterns reflect the greater similarity between the investment opportunities in active growth microcap and venture capital. Exhibit 3: Correlation with Venture Capital Returns (Quarterly, 1990 to 2Q 2013) Correlation with Cambridge VC Cambridge Associates Venture Capital Index 1.0 Passive Large Cap (Russell 1000) 0.44 Passive Small Cap (Russell 2000) 0.38 Active Microcap Growth 0.53 Source: Acuitas, Cambridge Associates, Russell, evestment Alliance. Summary We believe that an allocation to active Microcap has a place for both investors making a strategic allocation as well as investors using it as a temporary proxy for private equity. Many of the advantages of private equity, such as the ability of skilled managers to generate strong returns through concentrated positions in high confidence investments, can be found with greater liquidity, transparency, and flexibility in active Microcap investing. References Allianz Global Investors Capital, Micro-Cap Investing: A Suitable Alternative to Private Equity. 2010. Bruce Grantier, Is Small Cap a Viable Alternative to U.S. Private Equity? April 2009. Zhiwu Chen, Roger Ibbotson, Wendy Hu. Liquidity as an Investment Style. September 2010. 4

Disclosures This material is presented solely for informational purposes and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold a security. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment or strategy is suitable for a particular investor. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. Information is obtained from sources deemed reliable, but there is no representation or warranty as to its accuracy, completeness or reliability. All information is current as of the date of this material and is subject to change without notice. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the Firm as a whole. The general information contained in this publication should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax, and investment advice from a licensed professional. 5