NORTH MINNEAPOLIS: INTRODUCTION This report is part of a larger collaborative between the Local Initiatives Support Corporation (LISC) and the Center for Urban and al Affairs (CURA) that addresses regional disparities in an effort to inform community development and revitalization efforts in the Twin Cities. This report looks specifically at the Building Sustainable Communities (BSC) study area found in. With a focus on employment and economic development, it addresses a series of indicators of economic health and household capacity in an attempt to illuminate discrepancies at multiple scales of analysis. Data on is compared against standards at the city and regional scale in an attempt to provide a place-based assessment of current development. NORTH MINNEAPOLIS STUDY AREA DEMOGRAPHICS White Black/ Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Other Two or More Races White Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Other Two or More Races Population 42,693 1. 1,446 24.5% 21,231 49.7% 686 1.6% 5,928 13.8% 18.1% 1,826 4.3% 2,558 6. Data found in later sections of this report will use modified versions of the demographic population categories found here. Due to its small sample size, values for the Hawaiian/Pacific Islander category will not be shown, while values for the category will occasionally be omitted. Additionally, due to definitional heterogeniety, the Other and Two or More Races categories will also not be shown. Finally, the population and the Non- White populations will be supplemented to provide metrics with a greater capacity to impact policy decisions. TWIN CITIES POVERTY RATE BY CENSUS TRACT The study area used in this assessment utilized as a foundation the Building Sustainable Communities boundaries and determined a selection of best-fit census tracts from these boundaries. The map to the right provides a visual of how these two areas correspond to one another Data for the report comes from the Decennial Census and American Community Survey estimates
NORTH MINNEAPOLIS: POVERTY GRAPH OF POVERTY RATE BY RACE TABLE OF POVERTY RATE BY RACE comparison of to the larger City and Area number of individuals below the poverty line and the percentage of the population below the poverty line 7 6 Individuals Below Below Individuals Below Below Individuals Below Below 15,71 36.6% 83,366 22.5% 299,741 1.6% 1,364 15.1% 29,41 12.9% 133,45 6.2% Non- White 42. 29,735 45.4% 78,176 33.9% 2 8,348 256 63.4% 2,895 48.9% 5,536 32.4% 1 2,723 43. 6,24 3.7% 31,481 17.2% 1,433 41.3% 12,421 33. 38,546 23.3% 5 4 3 The Current Poverty for The African American Population of is: Poverty in is distributed unevenly by race. While the White (Non-) poverty rate is 15.1%, all other racial categories face rates at least 25 percentage points higher. The Poverty also follows a pattern of spatial concentration in. The Poverty for is significantly higher (36%) than the rate for the City (21.7%) or the Area (1.5%). This disparity is further pronounced when examining spatial variations by race. For example, the poverty rate in (42.) is 35.8% higher than the White (Non-) poverty rate in the Area as a whole. The Current Poverty for the White (Non-) Population of the is: 6.2% Reducing the Mpls Poverty to Match the White Poverty will Require This Many People to Move Out of Poverty: 7,116 31.3% Accounts for This age of the Metro s Population Below Poverty: 43.9% White (Non-) 9,68 196 5,785 7,116 24 1,97 985 231 2,331 1,218 comparison of trends for years 2, 29, and 212 Accounts for This age of the Metro s Population: 12,48 83 GRAPH OF POVERTY RATE BY RACE OVER TIME 42. The table above provides metrics on the number of people who would need to move out of poverty in order to match the White (Non-) poverty rate for both the City and the. These values provide insight into areas of emphasis as seen by racial group of Mpls Population of Mpls Poverty (by Race) 1.9% 4. 3.3% 6.8% 18.1% 4.6% 28.1% 8.8% 31.3% 43.9% 9.2% 11.5% White (Non-) The table above provides metrics on the percentage of individuals below poverty for each race that accounts for in the City s population below poverty. This value is compared to the overall population by race that accounts for in the City s population to provide statistics on the relative concentration of poverty in by racial group. The graph to the left shows illustrates the change in poverty rate over time, with values for the years 2, 29, and 212. Data for the, White (Non-),,, and populations in are provided, as well as the White (Non-) rate for the City and as comparison metrics. The table below shows total values for each geographic area. The poverty rate for has been consistently higher than the City and rates faced a more rapid increase in poverty between 2 and 29 than the City or the Additionally, saw a decrease in its poverty rate between 29 and 212, as opposed to the slight increase seen by the City and The poverty rate gap increased by 1.6% between and the City, and by 2.8% between and the between 2 and 212 2 29.7% 16.9% 6.9% 29 212 37.2% 36.1% 21.5% 9.2% 21.7% 1.5%
NORTH MINNEAPOLIS: UNEMPLOYMENT GRAPH OF UNEMPLOYMENT RATE BY RACE comparison of to the larger City and Area TABLE OF UNEMPLOYMENT RATE BY RACE number of individuals in the workforce, separated by employment status 3 25% 1,513,652 3,965 21,87 119,13 21.1% 9.5% 7.3% 5,661 163,337 1,31,636 Employed 5,68 152,998 1,232,181 593 1,339 78,455 1.5% 6.3% 6. White (Non) 29,346 14,866 15% 5% 231,216 1,632,782 Employed 2 1 18,831 Racial disparities in unemployment exist in. While the White (Non) and unemployment rates are relatively low (1.5% and 13.6% respectively), the and unemployment rates roughly double these rates (28.9% and 2.9% respectively) The unemployment rate in (21.1%) is higher than both the City (9.5%) and the (7.3%) as a whole. This unequal spatial distribution of employment is further exacerbated when accounting for racial categories. GRAPH OF UNEMPLOYMENT RATE BY RACE OVER TIME comparison of trends for years 2, 29, and 212 8,64 3,56 113,89 6,144 23,518 94,167 2,496 6,988 19,723 17.3% 28.9% 22.9% 98 2,441 8,35 Employed 98 1,824 6,886 617 1,464. 25.3% 17.5% 2,39 1,816 92,96 1,827 9,487 84,894 482 1,329 8,12 2.9% 12.3% 8.6% 1,461 18,981 82,334 1,263 17,226 74,478 198 1,755 7,856 13.6% 9.3% 9.5% Employed The graph to the left shows illustrates the change in unemployment rate over time, with values for the years 2, 29, and 212. Data for the, White (Non-),,, and populations in are provided, as well as the White (Non-) rate for the City and as comparison metrics. The table to the right shows unemployment rates for each geographic area. 8.1% Accounts for This age of the City's Population: 18.1% of Mpls Labor Force of Mpls (by Race) 8.1% 18.1% 3.5% 28.3% 4. 21.3% 7.7% 5.7% 35.7%. 36.3% 11.3% White (Non-) Employed Employed Accounts for This age of the City's Population: The table above provides metrics on the percentage of unemployed individuals for each race that accounts for in the City s unemployed population. This value is compared to the overall population by race that accounts for in the City s population to provide statistics on the relative concentration of unemployment in by racial group. The Current Unemployment for the Population in is: 28.9% The Current Unemployment for the White (Non-) Population of the City of is: 6.3% Reducing the Mpls Poverty to Match the White Poverty will Require This Many People to Move Out of Poverty: 1,952 2,779 282 2,835 3 1,952 1,978 337 16 343 11 White (Non-) The table above provides metrics on the number of people who would need to procure employment in order to match the White (Non-) employment rate for both the City and the. These values provide insight into areas of emphasis by racial group The unemployment rate for has been consistently higher than the City or al unemployment rate Although facing a higher unemployment rate than al levels, encountered a slower rate of increase in unemployment (62.3%) than the (18%) between 2 and 212 However, the unemployment rate gap between and the City has increased by 4.4% and the gap between and the has increased by 4.3% 2 13. 5.8% 3.5% 29 18. 8.2% 6. 212 21.1% 9.5% 7.3%
NORTH MINNEAPOLIS: INCOME TABLE OF MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY RACE GRAPH OF MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY RACE comparison of to the larger City and Area $8, $7, $6, $5, 212 for a 4-Person Household $4, $3, $2, $1, $31,798 $48,881 $66,91 $45,923 $6,195 $71,895 $25,31 $2,62 $29,723 $2,884 $19,715 $38,44 $29,975 $39,68 $65,391 $3,253 $33,958 $42,641 White (Non-) GRAPH OF INCOME CATEGORIES comparison of to the larger City and Area $ $1,25 per month or less $1,251 to $3,333 per month The median household income in varies significantly by race. For example, the median White (Non-) income is at least $15, higher than that of any other racial group. The median household income is also consistently lower in than city levels for all categories except s and s. While median household income has steadily increased between 2 and 212 for the City (21.6% increase) and Area (28.7% increase), income levels have stayed relatively constant for (3% increase) GRAPH OF MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY RACE OVER TIME comparison of trends for years 2, 29, and 212 More than $3,333 per month 2 4 6 TABLE OF INCOME CATEGORIES $1,25 per month or less $1,251 to $3,333 per month More than $3,333 per month 27.4% 44.1% 28.5% 19.7% 34.7% 45.6% 18.6% 3.9% 5.5% Data on income categories divides up employees in the region into three categories based on their monthly income. The categories roughly equate to annual incomes of below $15,, $15, to $4,, and ablove $4,. Data comes from LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics. As seen above, the income distribution in differs greatly from that seen at the City and al levels, with a majority of those employed holding jobs in the middle-income range compared to a more positively skewed distribution at the larger geographies. Furthermore, has a higher percentage of employed peoples in the lowest income category, with 27.4% of its employed population making less than $15, annually, compared to 19.7% and 18.6% for the City and respectively.
NORTH MINNEAPOLIS: LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION The Labor Force is measured as percentage of the civilian population over 16 that is either employed or unemployed but actively seeking employment. The participation rate is a tool used to measure the market supply of labor in a particular region, indicating the potential for economic growth. Furthermore, it is used in order to develop statistics which take into account discouraged job seekers and others with limitations preventing their participation in the workforce. TABLE OF LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATE BY RACE GRAPH OF LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATE BY RACE comparison of to the larger City and Area 9 White (Non) 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 GRAPH OF LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATE OVER TIME comparison for trends for years 2, 29, and 212 29171 18831 314,97 231,288 2,24,395 1,634,124 64.6% 73.4% 72.9% 8247 5661 213,416 163,385 1,789,146 1,311,787 68.6% 76.6% 73.3% 13313 864 47,764 3,57 163,329 113,977 64.9% 63.9% 69.8% 341 98 4,54 2,441 13,588 8,352 28.7% 53.8% 61.5% 43 239 17,98 1,816 133,32 92,913 57.7% 63.3% 69.7% 243 1461 24,742 18,983 16,856 82,379 71.5% 76.7% 77.1% Labor Force is consistently lower than the rate for the Area for all racial categories The for the population in is particularly low at 57.7%. Converseley, the is found to be the highest in at 71.5%. The fluctuated significantly over time for the and populations, while staying relatively constant with a slight increase for the and White populations The graph to the left shows illustrates the change in participation rate over time, with values for the years 2, 29, and 212. Data for the, White (Non-),,, and populations in are provided, as well as the White (Non-) rate for the City and as comparison metrics. The table to the right shows average labor force participation rates for each geographic area. The Current for the Population in is: 57.7% The Current for the White (Non) Population of the is: 73.3% Increasing the to Match the White will Require This Many People to Enter the Workforce: 625 The Current for the African American Population in is: 64.9% The Current for the White (Non) Population of is: 76.6% Increasing the to Match the White will Require This Many People to Enter the Workforce: 1,558 3,514 656 2,551 384 1,558 1,118 163 152 757 625 14 37 Non- White The table above displays the number of people who would need to move into the labor force in order to match the current participation rate for the White (Non-) population of and the. 2 63. 72. 74.2% 29 64.4% 73.5% 73.7% 212 64.6% 73.4% 72.9%
NORTH MINNEAPOLIS: HOUSING GRAPH OF COST-BURDENED HOUSEHOLDS BY TENURE STATUS TABLE OF COST-BURDENED HOUSEHOLDS BY TENURE STATUS comparison of to the larger City and Metrpolitan Area 7,273 5,431 1,426 4,692 2,84 64.5% 52.3% Owner Owner Renter Cost-Burdened Households are defined as households which spend 3 or more of their income on housing costs. This measure evolved from housing discourse in the National Housing Act of 1937 and pre- mid-199 federal mortgage loan policies, and is currently used as an indicator of the impact and restrictions of housing costs on a household s standard of living. of Housing Units of CostBurdened Households age of CostBurdened Households 2 4 6 338,683 62,396 183,393 3,588 162,565 194,594 24,746 19.3% 48. 32.3% 13.5% 83,3 64,566 18,597 281 41,25 23,981 19.7% 49.4% 37.1% The Current age of who are CostBurdened in is: 64.5% The Current age of who are CostBurdened in is: 52.3% The Current age of who are CostBurdened in the City of is: 49.4% The Current age of who are CostBurdened in the is: 32.3% Reducing the Cost-Burden to Match the City's Cost-Burden rate will Require This Many to Move out of CostBurden Status: 1,99 Reducing the Cost-Burden to Match the 's Cost-Burden rate will Require This Many to Move out of CostBurden Status: 1,86 8 The number of renters who are cost-burdened in is significantly higher than the number of costburdened owners both with a mortgage (12.2%) and without (44.8%) Geographically, for all tenure statuses, has a consistently higher percentage of cost-burdened households than the City or the The high levels of discrepancy by tenure status indicate a necessity to focus targeted policy particularly toward renters The higher percentage of cost-burdened households in indiates a reduced capacity for household resiliency, stability, and security. In particular, the lack of resiliency limits neighborhood-level community investment. Tackling this issue will require a significant investment, as seen in the figure to the right GRAPH OF COST-BURDENED HOUSEHOLDS OVER TIME (RENTERS) 1,99 1,21 Owner 825 1,86 88 The table to the right displays the number of households that would need to move out of costburdened status to match the White (Non-) rate for and the, divided up as renters, owners with a mortgage, and owners without a mortgage. Between 2 and 29, faced a 14.1% increase in households at cost-burdened status for renters and 22.4% increase for owners with a mortgage. Neither category has been able to reduce this rate to 2 levels. While the percentage of households that are cost-burdened in has been consistently higher than levels seen at the City or al level, there has been a minimal increase in this gap between 2 and 212 for both renters and owners with a mortgage GRAPH OF COST-BURDENED HOUSEHOLDS OVER TIME (OWNERS) TABLE OF NORTH MINNEAPOLIS HOMEOWNERSHIP RATE White (Non-) Owner Renter 1413 6857 7273 48.5% 4696 3543 1153 75.4% 6751 2213 4538 32.8% 139 66 73 47.5% 1335 656 679 49.1% 743 189 554 25.4%