State Consultation on the Development of a Federal Exchange

Similar documents
Blueprint for Approval of Affordable Statebased and State Partnership Insurance Exchanges

General Guidance on Federally-facilitated Exchanges

Draft Blueprint for Approval of Affordable State-based and State Partnership Insurance Exchanges

Agenda. 1. Federal Health Care Reform: Background and Overview. 2. Exchange Operations. 3. Exchange Establishment Funding

Affordable Insurance Exchanges: More Choices, Competition and Clout

State Decisions: Federally Facilitated Exchange (FFE) States

Health Insurance Exchange Blueprint Application Progress. Public Meeting Presentation October 10, 2012

Subject HHS Commentary From Preamble Regulatory Provision Agent Specific Provisions Definition of Agent/Broker

AFFORDABLE INSURANCE EXCHANGES: HIGHLIGHTS OF THE PROPOSED RULES

Overview of October 24, 2013 Final Rule on Program Integrity: Exchange, Premium Stabilization Programs, and Market Standards

Affordable Insurance Exchanges

HHS Issues Proposed Rules on Implementing Health Insurance Exchanges

AFFORDABLE INSURANCE EXCHANGES: HIGHLIGHTS OF THE PROPOSED RULES

State Considerations for Health Insurance Exchanges. Krista Drobac, Director, Health Division September 21, 2012 American Osteopathic Association

Health Insurance Exchanges Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA)

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight. State Planning and Establishment Grants for the Affordable Care Act s Exchanges

Frequently Asked Questions on Exchanges, Market Reforms and Medicaid

Adopted Permanent Rules Relating to Policies and Procedures to Certify Entities to Deliver Consumer Assistance Services

Governance and Oversight. Implementing Exchanges. Part of a Families USA series on implementing state health insurance exchanges

Re: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Establishment of Exchanges and Qualified Health Plans. File Code CMS 9989 P

Affordable Care Act: State Resources FAQ

Section 1332 Waivers. State Health Care Reform Services

Plans; Exchange Standards for Employers, 77 Fed. Reg (March 27, 2012) (to be codified at 45 C.F.R. pts. 155, 156, and 157).

AMERICAN HEALTH BENEFIT EXCHANGE MODEL ACT

Actuarial equivalence will be confirmed via an actuary s letter from the health insurance issuer to the State

Final 2018 Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters

Arkansas Health Insurance Marketplace

HHS Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Establishment of Exchanges and Qualified Health Plans

CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS. Arkansas Health Care Independence Program (Private Option)

Draft: 5/9/11 HEALTH INSURANCE EXCHANGES UNDER THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT: GOVERNANCE OPTIONS AND ISSUES I. INTRODUCTION

State Health Reform Assistance Network Charting the Road to Coverage

Providing Accessible Enrollment Assistance Under the ACA

Navigator, Agent and Broker Work Group

Eligibility & Enrollment Regulations

Rulemaking implementing the Exchange provisions, summarized in a separate HPA document.

1332 State Innovation Waivers Under the Trump Administration. Manatt Health April 12, 2017

December 20, Re: Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2015 proposed rule. To Whom it May Concern,

Employer Reporting of Health Coverage Code Sections 6055 & 6056

DRAFT Maryland 1332 Waiver Application

THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT: NAVIGATORS

MAXIMUS Webinar Series. CMS Rule for Medicaid and CHIP Managed Care. Version

Washington State Health Benefit Exchange

Questions from Agents/Producers

RHODE ISLAND GOVERNMENT REGISTER PUBLIC NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: HHS Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2014 Final Rule Summary.

CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS. Indiana Family and Social Services Administration

Reporting Requirements for Employers and Health Plans

PPACA and Health Care Reform. A Chronological Guide to Changes and Provisions Affecting Employee Benefits Plans and HR Administration

Lifeline Risk Assessment

In addition to the definitions in Section 6410 of Article 2 of this chapter, for purposes of this article, the following terms shall mean:

Issue Brief Health Insurance Exchanges: Key Considerations for Maternal and Child Health Programs

From: Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight (CCIIO) Title: DRAFT 2016 Letter to Issuers in the Federally-facilitated Marketplaces

5GBenefits, LLC Your Health Care Reform Partner

Health Insurance Exchanges: Health Insurance Navigators and In-Person Assistance

OVERVIEW OF THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT. September 23, 2013


Single Payer (Medicare-for-All) Public Plan Option (Federal/Medicare) Medicare Buy-In for Older Adults Medicaid Buy-In

COVERED CALIFORNIA QUALIFIED HEALTH PLAN ISSUER CONTRACT FOR FOR COVERED CALIFORNIA FOR SMALL BUSINESS. between

Application, Review and Reporting Process for Waivers for State Innovation Summary of Proposed Rule Revised March 18, 2011

HEALTH INSURANCE MARKETPLACE. May 21,

June 18, To Whom It May Concern:

Independent External Audit Report: Programmatic Audit Findings Report Plan Year Ended December 31, 2016

State Innovation Waivers: Frequently Asked Questions

Maryland Health Benefit Exchange. Grand Rounds Presentation. Rebecca Pearce Executive Director, MHBE. October 17, 2012

Evolution of the Massachusetts Health Connector Lessons learned

6 KEY QUESTIONS TO ENSURE EFFECTIVE MANAGED CARE ADMINISTRATION AND OVERSIGHT

Arkansas Health Insurance Marketplace

Opportunities on the Horizon Florida Healthy Kids Corporation & the Affordable Care Act

DRAFT Premium Adjustment Percentage

Re: Comments on HHS Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2018 Proposed Rule, CMS-9934-P

Article 6. Application, Eligibility, and Enrollment Process for the SHOP

Plan Management Blueprint Overview

Individual Market: Agent Payment Options July 16, 2012

Supporting Statement: Risk Corridors Data Validation for the 2014 Benefit Year

Self-Pay Patient Eligibility and Enrollment Assistance Considerations under the ACA

Healthcare Reform and Exchanges Impacts

Market Reform and Policy Issues for Implementation of Health Reform in North Carolina. In Person TAG Meeting #5 March 30, 2012

RE: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Establishment of Exchanges and Qualified Health Plans: Proposed Rule CMS-9989-P

Issue brief: Medicaid managed care final rule

Understanding the Affordable Care Act:

Status Report & Budget Proposal. May 23, 2013

NEW MEXICO OFFICE OF HEALTH CARE REFORM 2 nd Quarterly Report Project Summary for CCIIO April 15, 2011 OMB #

Date: February 6, From: Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

California Code of Regulations Add Article 9. Plan-Based Enrollers ( 6700 et seq.) Title 1. Investment Chapter 12. California Health Benefit Exchange

Florida Health Insurance Advisory Board Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act

1) to develop understanding of the feasibility of applying certification criteria for QHPs to stand-alone dental plans; and

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Exchange Functions: Standards for

Understanding the Health Insurance Marketplace. August 2013

State Innovation Waivers:

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION

ACA Impact on State Regulatory Authority: Health Plans Outside Exchanges

2015 Renewal Consumer Experience. Working Draft v

Special Enrollment Period Reference Chart

SUBMISSION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS:

Nevada Health Link. Creation of the Nevada Health Link. July 31, Operated by the Silver State Health Insurance Exchange

Eligibility & Enrollment

Open Enrollment is here!

Frequently Asked Questions Last Updated: November 16, 2015

Values Accountability Integrity Service Excellence Innovation Collaboration

Plan Management Stakeholder Committee July 19, 2018

Transcription:

State Consultation on the Development of a Federal Exchange The Affordable Care Act (ACA) directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to facilitate the establishment of an Exchange in any state that does not achieve certification by January 1, 2013. HHS has published a draft application for that certification form under the Paperwork Reduction Act. We wish to emphasize to our partners in HHS that it is equally important for states to understand the nature of the federal alternative that will be facilitated if they do not seek certification. In fact, due to the complex nature of the policy decision process at the state level, states need this information much sooner than the January 1, 2013 deadline required of states requesting certification. We request the following information from HHS no later than June 1, 2012 in order for us to make an informed decision about the direction we should pursue. This deadline is necessary to allow states that are considering deferring some (or all) functions of the exchange to HHS to understand how those processes would work in the context of a state exchange. This information request is based on the certification form proposed by HHS for states. It seems reasonable that HHS be able to provide the same type of information to states as the states would be required to provide to HHS. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS For each of the following planning and operational areas, please provide a detailed description of the plans for proposed federal exchanges that includes, at a minimum, a comprehensive implementation plan along with business process models, key milestones, high-level timelines, and detailed progress reports showing current achievement of the milestones. The responses should also outline how the implementation plan would be adapted for different states, and what the costs to each state would be to accommodate the federal exchange. If HHS plans to contract out any of the functions described below to any entities (including state agencies as well as private entities) please provide a description that includes any current or future agreements with eligible entities that will carry out responsibilities of the exchange, procedures in place to ensure program integrity and prevention of fraud, waste and abuse, and how the exchange plans to ensure that the entities will carry out contracted responsibilities of the exchange in compliance with state and federal requirements. The description should also include the name of the contractors, contact points, evidence of contractor qualifications and an assessment of the conflict of interest of each contractor. PART 1. ENABLING AUTHORITY AND GOVERNANCE I. Enabling Authority: Please explain your authority to establish a federal exchange in any particular state, identifying any limitations or provisions. This explanation should include: a. A copy of current law and/or regulation that clearly indicates the legal authority under which a federal exchange would be established, and b. A written legal opinion from the Office of the Attorney General or a declaration from a federal court certifying that the federal government is authorized to establish an exchange under federal law, and detailing the authority of the federal government in all operational aspects of the exchange, including, but not limited to the authority to

II. III. administer premium tax credits, collect and disburse fees and payments, and require states to participate or cooperate. c. Please note that proposed or pending legislation or regulations will not be sufficient to establish the nature and authority of the federal government to establish and operate an exchange. To the extent that any law or regulation is not clear on its face that the federal government has authority to establish or operate any function of the exchange, the written legal opinion described in (b) above must be provided. Governance: HHS should outline their plans for governance of any federal exchange established in a state. a. Governing Body: HHS should submit the rules or regulations under which they plan to structure the governing body for federal exchanges, including: i. A description of the entity that will be running the exchange and the overseeing governing body, including rationale for selecting this governance model ii. A description of the organizational structure of the exchange, including providing an organizational chart and resumes on executive leadership b. Board Membership: If HHS plans to involve non-governmental stakeholders, please include: i. A description of the overall board composition, rationale for this structure, and how members are selected ii. A conflict of interest policy and procedure for preventing or mitigating conflicts of interest, including an explanation if any conflicts are known to exist Non-interference with State Standards Please provide an attestation that the federal exchange will not establish standards that conflict with those promulgated by state legislatures or agencies that are responsible for maintaining a solvent and regulated insurance market related to the exchange. PART 2: FUNCTIONS OF THE FEDERAL EXCHANGE I. Consumer Functions: It is assumed that the federal exchanges will provide functions similar to those that are required of state exchanges. Please describe in detail plans to address the following consumer needs in each state that will have a federal exchange. a. Outreach and Education: Please provide a description of the HHS plan to consult with relevant stakeholders, including consumers, individuals and entities with experience in facilitating enrollment in health plans, representatives of small businesses and selfemployed individuals, State Medicaid offices, and advocates for enrolling hard to reach populations. As part of this description, please include a description of: i. The approach to identify and consult with state-level stakeholders ii. The approach to providing outreach and educational materials to the public about the exchange iii. The approach to establishing relationships and working with partners (including insurers, agents and brokers) to connect with hard-to-reach populations

iv. Evidence of consultation with state-level stakeholders to date, and plans for future engagement of stakeholders at the state level v. How HHS has considered (or will consider) the comments submitted by statelevel stakeholders in designing a federal exchange for that state b. Call Center: Please provide a description of the approach to develop state-oriented callcenter operations, including: i. A description of the approach to ensure sufficient consumer outreach, interpretation services, and overall consumer experience ii. A description of the call center functionality and how it will interface with existing state call centers c. Insurance portal: A federal exchange will need to provide a website through which enrollees and prospective enrollees of Qualified Health Plans can get comparative information. Please provide a description of the HHS plan for this portal that details: i. How it will support the consumer experience (including the interface with the call center, navigators, and agents/brokers) ii. How it will display accurate pricing information for QHPs, including what comparative information will be displayed, and a description of any features to simplify and support the consumer decision process iii. How the portal will calculate premiums, the second lower cost silver plan, and facilitate premium aggregation iv. How the portal will show consumers if a particular professional or facility is in the network of each plan v. How the portal will obtain and display relevant quality information about insurers vi. How the portal will support a seamless experience for those seeking eligibility or enrollment in various public or private programs or markets vii. The functionality and technology behind the electronic calculator and method to determine the actual expected out-of-pocket cost of coverage taking into account premium tax credits, cost sharing, cost-sharing reductions, and other relevant information for predicting the consumer s expected cost for each plan d. Navigators: Please provide a detailed description of the proposed federal exchange s Navigator program, including the types of entities that will be eligible to serve as Navigators and how the program will minimize conflicts of interest and ensure that Navigators possess the level of expertise required to perform any functions delegated to them. i. Please provide a strategy for funding the Navigator grants along with documentation that HHS has the legal authority to collect and disburse funds in that program e. Agents/brokers: Please provide a detailed summary of how the federal exchange will i. Engage agents/brokers in the design and function of the exchange ii. Determine appropriate compensation for the services agents/brokers provide to the exchange

II. III. IV. iii. Protect the role of agents/brokers from intrusion by non-licensed entities and prevent duplication of effort or service overlap by Navigators Eligibility: Please provide a detailed description of: a. The eligibility determination and redetermination process, including business process models b. Evidence of capacity, including adequate staffing, to accept and process applications through multiple channels, including in-person, online, mail, and phone, and to conduct verifications. Please describe the anticipated number of exchange employees providing these functions that will reside and work in the state and a detailed plan for geographic coverage c. Relevant notices and plan-related documents d. Evidence that agreements and processes are in place to share information with the Internal Revenue Service and other required federal agencies. e. How the federal exchange will determine in real time whether an individual s employer does not provide minimum essential coverage (MEC) or provides MEC that is unaffordable or does not meet the minimum value requirement Exemptions from the Individual Mandate: Please provide a detailed description of: a. The process for determining that an individual is exempt from the individual mandate, including the business process model b. Evidence of capacity, including adequate staffing, to accept and process applications for exemption through various channels required in statute Certification of QHPs and Plan Management: Please provide a detailed description of: a. How HHS will define the QHPs for each state that is considering a federal exchange, including: i. Will the exchange actively negotiate rates and limit entry? ii. How will the federal exchange determine the maximum number of insurers and QHPs plans that will be allowed on the federal exchange? iii. Any requirements above and beyond those in statute that will be placed on insurers offering QHPs in the federal exchange iv. Will plans be required to demonstrate financial advantage over their competitors to be included? b. The specific criteria for QHPs in each state covered by a federal exchange c. How the certification process will work, including the business process model d. How HHS will verify that an issuer is licensed and in good standing with the appropriate state authority and the cost to the state to comply with that process e. The specific approach to certification, recertification, and decertification of QHPs, including: i. What the standards and implications of these actions are ii. The division of responsibilities between HHS and the state Department of Insurance iii. Additional certification standards above the federal minimum that will be required in each state

iv. The approach (if any) to achieving plan alignment between the exchange and Medicaid v. The frequency and burden to insurers of recertification and the approach to annual plan renewal f. Ongoing oversight and monitoring of QHPs, including specific performance measures, tracking and resolving complaints, and compliance with certification requirements g. The proposed approach to rate analysis and benefit package review and how to populate the rating engine and calculator functions of the exchange h. How the exchange plans to collect, analyze, and publish quality data for QHPs i. How the exchange plans to engage insurers in these processes V. Financial Management: Please provide a detailed description of plans, policies, and procedures related to: a. The Risk Adjustment and Reinsurance programs and how those would be implemented in a state with a federal exchange b. HHS plan to keep an accurate accounting of all activities, receipts, and expenditures in a federal exchange, including: i. The mechanism for handling and processing payments or funds ii. The additional cost burden on the insurance market of these activities VI. Enrollment: The federal exchange must allow an individual to enroll in any qualified plan available to that individual. Please describe in detail: a. The business process model for QHP enrollment b. Evidence of capacity to accept and process QHP applications c. Evidence of existing functionality for plan comparison that allows individuals to receive an eligibility determination, compare and select plans, and be enrolled in the plan of their choice d. A description of all notices that the exchange will provide to individuals enrolling in QHPs VII. The SHOP Program: Please provide a detailed description of the SHOP program component of a federal exchange, including: a. Whether the governance, plan certification and management, enrollment, call center and other functions of the SHOP exchange will be handled separately from the insurance portal described above, and if so, a detailed description of the differences b. An action plan for outreach and education efforts in the small business community c. How the SHOP exchange will interface and work with brokers/agents d. Any limitations placed on employers, including potential requirements for employers to limit employee choice or structure defined contribution in a particular way e. What tools and functionality to benefit employers and employees will be built into the SHOP exchange f. Any option for traditional group plans to be offered to employers g. How the exchange will correctly display information when employees have choices available to them, such as family tiers, dependent coverage, and opting out of coverage

h. How the exchange plans to provide transparent information to the employer about the true cost of coverage, including separating out the cost of administering the exchange from premiums i. A comprehensive description of the proposed roles of brokers, agents, and navigators in the SHOP exchange, including: i. An analysis of the proposal vis-à-vis existing state regulation of sales activities and roles ii. The method by which brokers, agents, and Navigators will be compensated j. How HHS will decide whether to include business with 51 to 100 employees in the SHOP exchange in any given state k. How the SHOP exchange will determine employer eligibility and what to do when an eligible employer becomes ineligible mid-plan-year l. The enrollment process and timeframes, including rolling enrollments, special enrollment periods, etc. m. How the SHOP exchange will handle premium aggregation, including the process for handling shortages or non-payment, reconciling accounts, etc. n. How the SHOP exchange will mitigate the incentive for employees to migrate to the non-group programs of the exchange VIII. Reporting: Please provide a description of how the federal exchange will satisfy the reporting requirements of the ACA, including: a. Reporting to the Secretary of the Treasury required lists of individuals such as those exempt from the individual mandate or who are eligible for premium tax credits or costsharing reductions b. A comprehensive process for reporting to employers information on employees whose enrollment could trigger penalties for the employer c. Publication of the cost burden of the federal exchange including the cost of licensing, regulatory fees, payments required by the exchange, administrative costs, and losses due to fraud, waste, and abuse IX. Funding: Please provide a detailed plan for how the federal exchanges will be self-sustaining by the deadlines in statute. Please include in that plan a detailed list of all entities that will be expected to pay for the operational and other costs of the federal exchange and an estimate of the economic incidence of those costs. X. Program Integration: Please provide a detailed plan for program integration that includes: a. A detailed plan for transitioning the PCIP and state high risk pool enrollees into the private and public plans as of January 1, 2014 through a federal exchange b. A detailed description of every interface and necessary coordination with Medicaid (Title XIX) or CHIP (Title XXI) eligible persons in the state c. Proposed requirements on state programs to provide information or services to facilitate that integration and the consequences for failure to comply d. Evidence of successful collaboration with state agencies administering Medicaid, CHIP, and BHP (of applicable), including: i. Any MOUs or contracts developed with each agency

XI. XII. ii. Descriptions of roles and responsibilities of the federal exchange, state Department of Insurance, and other agencies related to QHPs iii. Descriptions of roles and responsibilities of the federal exchange and state agencies that administer Medicaid, CHIP, and BHP, related to eligibility determinations, income verifications, and enrollment processes iv. A statement from each affected state agency indicating their level of satisfaction with the existing cooperative relationship with HHS Oversight and Monitoring: Please provide a description of the policies and procedures (to date) for oversight and monitoring of the federal exchange, including procedures to prevent fraud, waste, and abuse Adjudication of Appeals of Eligibility Determination: Please describe the procedures by which the Secretary or other federal officers hears and makes decisions with respect to appeals of any determination. Please provide a description of the process for adjudicating eligibility appeals, including timelines, deadlines, notice requirements and the process for coordinating with the State Medicaid agency. This description should also include evidence of existing capacity to accept and process appeals and evidence of a firewall or absence of conflict of interest between the entity performing appeals and the entity providing eligibility determinations. PART 3: FEDERAL TRANSPARENCY AND OPERATIONAL READINESS States that elect to utilize federal grant funding to implement and operate a state-based exchange are required to adhere to specific requirements and pass CMS Gate Reviews. CMS should be held to the same standards as states in the process of developing a federal exchange. Please identify the federal entity that will be tasked with this oversight and how states will be included in this process. Please demonstrate operational ability to meet the requirements outlined in Parts 1 & 2 by demonstrating to states that the federal exchange has the ability to meet the requirements of the Gate Review process.