PUD No. 1 of Pend Oreille County

Similar documents
MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS December 31, 2011 and 2010

Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County

Chelan County PUD Budget Presentation. November 2, 2015

Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County

Public Utility District #1 of Ferry County Budget. December 17, 2018

Public Utility District #1 of Ferry County Budget. December 19, 2016

Strategic Planning. Steve Wright, General Manager Feb. 7, 2019

Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position (Income Statement) Page 4

Introduction to Priest Rapids Project Power Sales Contracts

Financial Report - Year Ending December 31, 2000 Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County, Washington

Schedule of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position (Income Statement) Page 4

Public Utility District No. 1 of Lewis County. Customer Information. and. Electric Rate Schedules

Northern Wasco County People s Utility District. Report of Independent Auditors and Financial Statements with Supplementary Information for

Rationale The 'AA' rating on Chelan County Public Utility District No. 1 (Chelan), Wash.'s bonds reflects:

PEND OREILLE COUNTY ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS WITH SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF KLICKITAT COUNTY

DATE: November 18, 2015 SUBJECT: 2016 Proposed Budgets, Revenue Requirements, and Prices OBJECTIVE: Approval of 2016 Budget and Price Proposals

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS WITH SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION NORTHERN WASCO COUNTY PEOPLE S UTILITY DISTRICT

Global Credit Research New Issue 15 MAY New Issue: Chelan County Public Util. Dist 1, WA

EXHIBIT D STATEMENT OF COSTS AND FINANCING

Exhibit I SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TACOMA, KING COUNTY AND FRIENDS OF GREEN RIVER

2017 Budget. Final. v.2. Passed by Resolution No December 6, 2016

Jefferson County PUD. Rate Hearing November 10, 2016

Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County

2018 Budget. Board of Commissioners: Sidney Sid Logan Tanya Toni Olson Kathleen Kathy Vaughn

Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County

Eugene Water & Electric Board Adopted Budget. December 5, 2017

Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County

EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2006 AND 2005

The Fiscal Impact of the Proposed City of Sharon Springs on Forsyth County, Georgia

144 FERC 61,209 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION. (Issued September 19, 2013)

Fiscal Year Budget


OUR WORLD. OUR CITY. OUR RESPONSIBILITY.

PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT # 1 of Jefferson County 230 Chimacum Road Port Hadlock, WA July 16, 2008 SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES

October Snohomish County Public Utility District

Report of Independent Auditors and Combined Financial Statements with Supplementary Information for. Public Utility District No. 1 of Klickitat County

2017 UTILITY RATE STUDY WORK SESSION #2: BACKGROUND, EDUCATIONAL/INFORMATIONAL

DENVER SOUTHEAST SUBURBAN WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Pacific Gas and Electric Company. Statement of Estimated Cash Flows April 20, 2001

Team PUD 2019 BUDGET BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS: SIDNEY SID LOGAN TANYA TONI OLSON REBECCA WOLFE

Volume 1. Summary Table of Contents. Discussion of Financial Forecasts... BC Hydro Deferral Accounts...

COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR PUBLIC WORKS

M E M O R A N D U M. Financial savings initiatives over the last several years are summarized in Attachment 1. EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD

Yukon Energy Corporation

INTERIM MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS For the Three and Six Month Periods Ended June 30, 2017

Public Utility District No. 1 of Cowlitz County

Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position (Income Statement) Page 4

Your Trusted Energy Partner

Best Practices for Navigating the Hydro Relicensing Process

2012 Budget. Customer Presentation October 10, Helping to keep the lights on, businesses running and communities strong

Summary Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement

2019 Corporate Operating Plan

ELECTRIC UTILITY RATES

Request for Proposals. Cost of Service & Rate Study Proposals are due no later than March 30 th, 2018 at 3:00 p.m.

Report of Independent Auditors and Combined Financial Statements for. Public Utility District No. 1 of Klickitat County

M E M O R A N D U M. Issue

M E M O R A N D U M. Background

WELLS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (A Department of Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County, Washington) Financial Statements.

JEFFERSON PUD 2019 DRAFT BUDGET

INTERIM MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Florida s Electricity Investment Paul Cutler

City Services Appendix

Portland General Electric Reports 2017 Financial Results and Initiates 2018 Earnings Guidance

Tacoma, Washington; Retail Electric

CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE RESOLUTION NO.

Water and Sewer Utility Rate Studies

Q Internal Financial Report (Unaudited)

POWER PURCHASE and INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT FOR SNAP GENERATION

Economic Benefits of the Proposed Casa Diablo Geothermal Power Plant, Wahlstrom & Associates 2012

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS June 21, 2018 Staff Report to the City Council

2014 BUDGET EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Appendix. Investor Conference April 4, 2007 New York, NY

Department of Natural Resources Biennial Budget

Search - Finance Home - Yahoo! - Help. More Info: Quote News Reports SEC

KITTITAS COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO

Quarterly Report. April to September Ministry of Finance and Corporate Relations

Fiscal Year 2010 Columbia Generating Station Annual Operating Budget

Executive Summary Operating Budget and Forecast

SALT LAKE CITY WATER, SEWER, AND STORMWATER UTILITIES (Enterprise Funds of Salt Lake City Corporation) June 30, 2010

UNIFORM SYSTEM OF ACCOUNTS ACCOUNT LISTING BALANCE SHEET CHART OF ACCOUNTS ASSETS AND OTHER DEBITS

Board of Public Utilities Prepared Testimony of Lori Austin September, 2010

King County Flood Control District Flood Risk Reduction Work Program and Accomplishments

Platte River Power Authority

GREEN ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY (A New York Public Benefit Corporation) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS and INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORT. May 31, 2010 and 2009

Budget. One. Time Cost. Total

ASBPA PARTNERING COMMITTEE S GUIDANCE ON INCORPORATING SURFING CONCERNS INTO PLANNING AND DESIGN OF FEDERAL SHORE PROTECTION AND NAVIGATION PROJECTS

BUDGET AND CAPITAL WORK PLAN

Budget. Presentation to Madison County Board of Commissioners. June 22, 2015

SAUSALITO-MARIN CITY SANITARY DISTRICT 1 EAST ROAD SAUSALITO, CALIFORNIA Telephone: (415) Fax: (415)

RE: Initial Comments on the Integrated Program Review and Debt Service Options

Pikes Peak - America s Mountain

CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MEMORANDUM

Preliminary Findings Village of Painted Post and Town of Erwin Shared Services / Consolidation Study

Bellingham Medic One Levy Frequently Asked Questions

Your Guide to Residential Utility Services

2019 THREE YEAR OPERATING PLAN APPROVED BY COUNCIL DECEMBER 10, 2018

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife PROPAGATION Organization Chart COMMISSION DIRECTOR DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF FISH & WILDLIFE PROGRAMS

Investor Update Conference Call January 16, 2013

Transcription:

PUD No. 1 of Pend Oreille County

Public Utility District #1 of Pend Oreille County Approved December 2, 2014 Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County, Washington (the PUD, or the District) is a municipal corporation governed by an elected three person board of commissioners. The District consists of four primary systems: Box Canyon Production, Community Network, Electric, and Water. The District is proposing a consolidated $74 million balanced budget for 2015. The budget includes many different projects and is based on several different assumptions all of which are discussed in full detail below. Financial projections are developed using expected, worst and best case scenarios. The budget is a plan, and, despite best intentions, plans can change. For that reason, the summary below provides a look at different scenarios and the impact on the budget. Generation The Box Canyon Production System produces power from the Box Canyon Hydroelectric Project. The PUD was issued a license by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in 2005 that allows the District to operate Box Canyon Dam. The license has many different requirements that relate to wildlife and wildlife habitats in the project area, water quality, recreation, fish passage, trout habitat restoration, just to name a few. The fourth and final turbine runner was lowered into the turbine pit on September 15, 2014. Upgrade of this final turbine generator unit is scheduled for completion in December of this year. With all four new units operating, Box Canyon s generation capacity will increase from 76 to 90 megawatts. Communication Services The Community Network System (CNS) supplies wholesale broadband communication services. CNS was created in 2010 and became fully operational in 2014. Fiber optic lines are installed to approximately 4,000 homes in the County and over 1,150 customers have been connected to fiber. The Washington State legislators facilitated PUD s telecommunication infrastructure capacity sharing, but strictly in a wholesale role. Plainly saying, the District can only sell fiber on a wholesale basis, not directly to the customer. Therefore, the District charges Retail Service Providers (RSP s) for use of the fiber. The RSPs are the link to the consumer; customers purchase fiber connection through the RSP of their choosing. Page 1

District Power Resources The Electric System distributes electricity to residential and other consumers in Pend Oreille County. Energy resources are obtained from District owned resources Box Canyon Dam and the Calispell Hydro Plant, and outside sources Boundary Dam owned by Seattle City Light, and Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). The District receives 48 megawatts of power capacity from the City of Seattle s Boundary Hydroelectric Project. Power received from Boundary is the District s most inexpensive power source and a key component of the District s low customer rates. Page 2

Funding Sources Ponderay Newsprint Corporation (PNC), which operates a paper machine and fiber mill in Usk, Washington, is the District s largest electric customer. Approximately 60% of the District s revenue is from PNC. General Service includes residential, commercial and industrial customers. Industrial revenue is expected to increase in 2015 due to the reopening of Teck American s Pend Oreille Mine. The budget assumes a ramp up year, which generates an additional $450,000 in revenue for the District. Community Network System revenue is increasing as more customers sign up for the service. The Budget assumes 1,395 standard class connections by the end of 2015. Revenue $60 $50 $47 $50 $49 $51 $ in millions $40 $30 $20 $10 $0 2012 Actual 2013 Actual 2014 Est. General Service PNC Other Elec CNS Water Worst Expected Best The number of customers, and/or usage, decreases. $100,000 reduced revenue Pend Oreille Mine ramps up slower than anticipated, thus reducing usage from expectations. $125,000 reduced revenue # of Residential Customers The number of customers increases slightly, with average usage. Pend Oreille Mine Pend Oreille Mine usage increases slowly, as it ramps up to full production. The number of customers and/or average usage, increases by more than expected. $100,000 additional revenue Pend Oreille Mine reaches full production sooner than expected, thus increasing usage. $180,000 additional revenue Page 3

Operation & Maintenance Expenses Maintenance expenses were higher in 2014 due to the summer storms. Summer storms tore through the region on July 23 and August 2, 2014, both of which left thousands of customers without power and fiber service. District costs to repair damage were over $1 million. Operation and Maintenance expenses for 2015 are forecasted to be slightly higher than prior years (excluding 2014) due primarily to inflation, regulatory requirements, and the District s increased focus on system safety and reliability. The District has put a renewed focus on maintaining vegetation around service lines. As we saw earlier this year, high winds can uproot trees and send branches into power lines. Power outages, while inconvenient, also pose a threat to public safety. Downed wires can cause serious injuries and spark fires. $12.5 $9.7 $10.1 $11.2 $10.5 $ in millions $10.0 $7.5 $5.0 $2.5 $0.0 2012 Actual 2013 Actual 2014 Est. Box Canyon Electric CN System Water Systems Worst Expected Best Expenses rise at 2% inflationary rate. The District experiences another severe storm. Expenses do not rise at inflationary rates and remain at 2013 levels. $1.0 million in additional expenses Expenses reduce by $0.4 million Page 4

Administrative & General Expenses Administrative and General (A&G) expenditures have risen faster than inflation over the past few years due primarily to required additional personnel. Ever increasing regulatory requirements is the driving factor in increasing the number of employees. Some employees have been transferred from other departments, in accordance with the District s effort to keep total headcount down. $7.5 $5.7 $5.4 $5.9 $6.0 $ in millions $5.0 $2.5 $0.0 2012 Actual 2013 Actual 2014 Est. Box Canyon Electric CN System Water Systems Page 5

Protection, Mitigation & Enhancement In additional to required capital projects, the District has several regulatory and maintenance projects budgeted in 2015. The requirements for the Protection, Mitigation and Enhancement measurers (PM&E,) per the Box Canyon FERC license, are estimated to be $2.6 million in 2015. These projects include improvement of wildlife and fish habitat, water quality monitoring, erosion mitigation, and environmental studies. In 2014 the District entered into an agreement with the USDA Forest Service for the erosion monitoring plan required as part of the FERC license. The District will pay the Forest Service $1.8 million over 5 years, and in exchange, the Forest Service will perform all necessary erosion work at these sites over the license period. $175 $230 $236 $210 $135 $271 $813 $550 ($ in thousands) 10(e) Payment Cultural Fisheries & Fishways Water Qlty & Weed Mgmt General Erosion Recreation Wildlife Page 6

Capital Expenditures Capital Expenditures are defined as items of tangible business property of a relatively permanent nature, having an acquisition cost of $2,000 or more. This includes, but is not limited to: land, new purchases of machinery and equipment, replacement and major rebuild of plant and equipment, construction projects, major spare parts, office furniture and fixtures and computer hardware and software. Total District capital expenditures are budgeted to be $25.2 million for the year. Of the total expected spending, $20.5 million will be debt financed. $3.5 $0.8 $0.1 $10.9 $9.9 ($ in millions) Box Canyon Electric System Water Systems Regulatory Affairs CN System Capital Expenditures Detail Capital Expenditures Funding Production $20,817,500 Debt Financed $20,475,000 Distribution $3,487,100 Cash Reserves $4,729,500 Community Network $814,900 Total $25,204,500 Water $85,000 Total $25,204,500 The District is continuing work on the projects required as part of the 2005 license renewal. The PUD is in the final stages of the turbine upgrade project. Although the project will be finalized in 2014, the 2015 budget does include $10 million for final invoices and contract closeouts for the project. Page 7

Work is ramping up on the upstream fish passage, another FERC requirement, for the Box Canyon Project. In 2015 the District will be spending approximately $9 million for the final engineering and design of the project along with the beginning stages of construction of the upstream passage. The project is expected to be completed in 2016, with a total project cost estimated to be $23 million. Total capital expenditure spending budgeted for the Production System is $20.8 million. The District continues to focus on maintaining desired system reliability. 2015 will be the fourth year of a seven year Test and Treat program. Distribution poles are tested, and then either treated to increase the lifespan or replaced if found to be aging or unsafe. This work is enhancing the safety and reliability of poles. The budget includes $50,000 for test and treat, and $400,000 in capital expenditures for replacement of poles. The District is in the second year of a four year project to meet Washington State Department of Transportation s (WSDOT) franchise update requirements. The franchise, or permit, issued by the WSDOT allows the District to put equipment in the state highway right of ways. In 2014 the District surveyed and documented all PUD equipment along Highway 211. The District will analyze approximately 50 poles and guy wires identified in the survey to determine if they need to be moved or can be left as is. The District will perform the same work on Highway 2, Highway 20 and Highway 31 in the years 2015, 2016 and 2017 respectively. The cost for each highway varies due to the number of miles, equipment, and remediation steps required. The 2015 Budget includes $330,000 for this project. Capital expenditure spending budgeted for the Distribution System is $3.5 million. The Community Network System is budgeting $814,900 in capital expenditures for the year. The majority of this budget is for new line extensions. $699,100 of the line extension budget is assumed to be a District cost, those for customers with qualifying consent forms, and for new customers with the $1,500 credit. The budget includes $90,000 for line extensions paid for by the customer; this cost is offset through revenue. District capital spending, net of the customer payments, will be limited to $725,000. Line extensions for those customers with qualifying consent forms will be limited to $200,000 in 2015. The Water System capital expenditure budget is $85,000. The system is budgeting $40,000 to replace undersized pipe at the Sunvale Acres subdivision. This is a three year project, estimated to cost $90,000, which will improve low water pressure. The Water System is also budgeting $45,000 for an emergency generator at Sandy Shores, to operate pumps in an emergency situation. Page 8

Debt Assumptions The assumes increased Box Canyon debt of $15 million in 2015, and assumes approximately $25 million will be borrowed in 2017, or later, dependent upon the construction timing of Box Canyon downstream fish passage. The 2015 proceeds will be spent on the Box Canyon upstream fish passage project, which is currently underway. The following graph shows an estimate of debt service (principal and interest) payments for the Production System bonds. $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 Production System Debt Service $0 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2009 Bonds 2010 Bonds 2012 Bonds New 2015 Bonds New 2017 Bonds The Electric System s debt service payments are as follows: $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 Electric System Debt Service 2005 Bonds 2010 Bonds Page 9

Labor Costs Linemen, Hydro Mechanics, Electricians, Technicians, System Operators, and many other positions are part of the International Brotherhood of Electric Workers (IBEW) union. Union personnel increases are dictated by contract, which was negotiated in 2014 for a new three year term. Under the new contract, union employees received a 3% wage increase effective April 1, 2014. Wage increases in 2015 and 2016 are based on CPI W, with a minimum increase of 2% and a maximum increase of 3.5%. Non union increases are at the discretion of District management, and affect roughly 50% of personnel. Management will continue to review industry and economic factors affecting wages through the first part of the year. The budget assumes a 2.75% increase for all employees. The average wage increase over the past five years has been 2.8% for union employees and 2.2% for non union employees. The includes $15.0 million for District wages and benefits. $3.6 million of these costs are expected to be capitalized as employees work on various projects, and therefore, included in the Capital Expenditures number discussed above. The remaining $11.4 million in labor costs are expensed. Worst Expected Best Wage increase is 3.5%. $66,000 in additional labor costs for the year. Wage increases are estimated to be 2.75% (based on CPI W), effective April 1, 2015 for Union employees and July 1, 2015 for nonunion employees. Wage increase is 2%. Labor costs reduced by $48,000 for the year. Page 10

Personnel In 2015 the District is requesting three additional Full Time Employees, offset by a reduction due to attrition and on call personnel. With the ever increasing regulatory requirements, both the Compliance and the Information Technology departments are requesting additional staff. The District is obligated to maintain compliance with over 900 reliability standard compliance requirements. Additional staffing is necessary to assist with processing incoming operating evidence, standards tracking and reporting obligations. The new Information Technology position will assist with increased work load necessary to become compliant with the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) required Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) standard. In addition, the Customer Service Department is requesting to turn the on call position into a full time employee. This person will be assuming duties of the front desk area. Installs, disconnects and billing are requiring more time to process for the CN System than originally anticipated. In addition, processing of locates takes a considerable amount of time with the new 'call before you dig' program. Department 2012 Actual 2013 Actual 2014 Actual 2015 Budget Administration 12 13 11 12 Electric Operations 29 28 31 31 Information Technology 4 5 7 8 Box Canyon Operations 21 21 20 20 Customer Service 10 9 9 10 Regulatory Affairs 9 9 9 9 Engineering 5 5 7 6 Water Systems 3 3 3 3 Community Network System 6 5 4 4 Full Time Employees 99 98 101 103 On Call Employees 4 6 5 4 Total Employees 103 104 106 107 Compared to 2014, these movements will net in two additional Full Time Employees (FTEs), and one fewer on call employee. The District anticipates ending 2015 with 103 Full Time Employees, and 4 on call employees. Page 11

Rate Adjustments The includes a projected 1.5% electric rate increase. Electrical rates are decided upon by the Commissioners during the spring of each year, and if adjustments are approved, they become effective July 1. The process always includes a public rate hearing. The District budget was compiled in accordance with the philosophy of managing finances toward small more frequent rate increases rather than larger periodic rate increases. CPI U, a measure of general inflation, is up 2.0% from September of last year to September of this year. In addition, the District is experiencing cost increases, beyond inflation, due to regulatory requirements. Despite rising costs, many out of the District s control, such as NERC regulation, the District is forecasting an increase even less than inflation. Additionally, the budget includes a projected 1.0% electric rate increase related to the cost of power the District receives from Seattle City Light s Boundary Dam. Boundary provides most of the power used by the District s residential and commercial customers and contributes to the District s low cost power rates. Seattle City Light recently relicensed Boundary Dam, and the District is expecting the cost to produce Boundary power to increase significantly over the next few years. Because the District has no control over this increase in cost, the District will analyze the change in Boundary cost each year to address the affect and adjust rates as necessary. The District s current residential electric rates are in the lowest 3% of the nation. The following chart shows the District s retail rate increases compared to other utilities across the state and nation. 14 Average Electric Residential Rates 12 Cents / kwh 10 8 6 4 2 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 National Average Washington State Average District Page 12

The District introduced the fiber standard class with a monthly rate of $35.00, which was slated to increase to $50.00 on January 1, 2015. In September 2014 the PUD Commissioners approved a gradual increase, with the standard class monthly rate increasing to $40.00 effective January 1, 2015 and $45.00 effective January 1, 2016. Both Sunvale and Sandy Shores Water system customers should expect a rate increase in the coming year to cover the cost of the capital projects proposed for the year. Page 13

Summary The District is proposing a consolidated $74 million balanced budget for 2015, the details of which were discussed in the document above, and shown numerically in the table below. Community Electric Production Network Water Total Budgeted Expenditures: System System System System Eliminations District Power from Box Canyon 17,863,224 (17,863,224) Power from Boundary 1,885,524 1,885,524 Power from BPA 8,555,657 8,555,657 Power from other sources 625,505 110,057 735,563 Wheeling and backup 1,017,674 1,017,674 Operation & Maintenance 6,462,760 2,922,724 913,410 249,735 10,548,629 PM&E costs 2,619,000 2,619,000 Customer accounting & information 722,864 8,000 730,864 Administrative and general 2,658,455 2,585,054 51,070 54,032 (390,000) 4,958,611 Taxes 2,405,438 110,347 6,171 20,233 2,542,189 Total Operating Expenditures 42,197,102 8,347,182 978,651 324,000 (18,253,224) 33,593,711 Interest on long term debt 883,819 7,804,802 7,900 6,382 8,702,903 Less amortization included in interest 81,314 (278,878) (197,564) Capital Project Payments 3,487,100 20,817,500 814,900 85,000 25,204,500 Renewal & Replacement Funding 250,000 250,000 Capital Improvement Funding 547,981 547,981 Principal payments 1,965,000 3,673,343 182,687 37,590 5,858,620 Total Budgeted Expenditures 49,162,315 40,613,949 1,984,138 452,972 (18,253,224) 73,960,150 Funding Sources: Operating Revenues 49,144,065 18,093,224 1,900,500 410,532 (18,253,224) 51,295,097 Interest income 18,250 2,066,125 200 87 2,084,662 Debt Financed 20,475,000 20,475,000 Grant/Third Party Funds Deferred and other income (20,400) (49,588) (69,988) Total Funding Sources 49,162,315 40,613,949 1,851,112 410,619 (18,253,224) 73,784,771 The Debt Service Coverage (DSC) Ratio measures the District's ability to pay the year's debt service (interest and principal payments) through net revenues. Debt covenants dictate the PUD maintain a DSC ratio of at least 1.25, although the District goal is 1.75. The 2015 budget is projecting a DSC of 2.32. Page 14