Tax Certainty EBF TAX CONFERENCE Brussels, 22 November Giorgia Maffini. OECD s Centre for Tax Policy and Administration

Similar documents
IMF and OECD deliver report addressing Tax Certainty, including practical recommendations for countries

EBIT

The OECD s 3 Major Tax Initiatives

Mr Piet Battiau Head of Consumption Tax Unit Centre for Tax Policy and Administration OECD 2, rue André Pascal Paris Cedex 16 France

OECD Mrs Marlies de Ruiter 2, rue André Pascal Paris Cedex 16 Frankreich. Düsseldorf, 16 th January 2015

THE TAX POLICY LANDSCAPE SIX YEARS AFTER THE CRISIS: A REVIEW OF RECENT TAX POLICY DEVELOPMENTS

Foundation for International Taxation Jubilee Conference

TAX AND INCLUSIVE GROWTH

European Business Initiative on Taxation (EBIT)

Overview of OECD Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS)

Business sets out key principles for digital tax measures

April 30, Re: USCIB Comment Letter on the OECD discussion draft on BEPS Action 3: Strengthening CFC Rules. Dear Mr. Pross, General Comments

Photo credits: Cover Rawpixel.com - Shutterstock.com

BEPS Action 14: Make Dispute Resolution Mechanisms More Effective

RESPONSE TO PUBLIC DISCUSSION DRAFT: MANDATORY DISCLOSURE RULES FOR ADDRESSING CRS AVOIDANCE ARRANGEMENTS AND OFFSHORE STRUCTURES

Presentation by Shigeto HIKI

Tax footprint report 2017

Base erosion & profit shifting (BEPS) 25 May 2016

IBFD Course Programme International Tax Planning after BEPS and the MLI

Guidance for Taxpayers on the Mutual Agreement Procedure (Q&A)

A. Five Main Issues BEPS documentation 2 International tax issues affecting source countries. 3 Change is Constant

JOINT AUDIT AND OTHER TOOLS IN THE INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION SCENARIO ILARIA PETRACCA, VALERIA IBELLO REVENUE AGENCY OF ITALY.

G8/G20 TAXATION ISSUES : Tax Training Day, ODI, London 16 September 2013

Roundup of Australia s BEPS developments

Base Erosion Profit Shifting (BEPS)

EU JOINT TRANSFER PRICING FORUM

LIVE WEBCAST UPDATE ON BEPS PROJECT. 26 May :00pm 2:00pm (CEST)

MULTILATERAL STRATEGIC PLAN ON MUTUAL AGREEMENT PROCEDURES: A VISION FOR CONTINUOUS MAP IMPROVEMENT. Preamble

Prepared by the CFE Fiscal Committee Submitted to the European Institutions in May 2018

OECD releases final BEPS package

Global Transfer Pricing Review

Mr. Joe Andrus Head of Transfer Pricing Unit Centre for Tax Policy and Administration OECD 2, rue Andre Pascal Paris France.

OECD releases France peer review report on implementation of Action 14 Minimum Standards

Private sector members' paper outlining corporate tax transfer pricing risk assessment and management approaches.

International Dispute Resolution: Global Perspectives and Opportunities GW-IRS Annual Tax Institute Washington, DC November 30, 2017

BEPS Action 3: Strengthening CFC rules

BEPS Country-by-Country Reporting Rules and New Documentation Requirements

General comments. William Morris Chair, BIAC Tax Committee Business & Industry Advisory Committee 13/15, Chauseee de la Muette Paris France

KPMG LLP 2001 M Street, NW Washington, D.C Comments on the Discussion Draft on Cost Contribution Arrangements

BEPS ACTION 15. Development of a Multilateral Instrument to Implement the Tax Treaty related BEPS Measures

TAX INCENTIVES FOR INVESTMENT: AN OECD COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK

5. Ireland is Countering Aggressive Tax Planning

WORKING PAPER. Financial Counsellors - ECOFIN preparation Presidency Issues Note on 'Tax Certainty in a Changing Environment'

The Taxation of Non-standard Work

Maldives Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 29 November 2018) General Information

Kenya Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 15 February 2018) General Information

Global Transfer Pricing Review kpmg.com/gtps

BEPS Action 14: Making dispute resolution mechanisms more effective

OECD meets with business on base erosion and profit shifting action plan

Photo credits: Cover Rawpixel.com - Shutterstock.com

Paraguay Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 27 June 2017)

Income Tax Workshop Base eroding payments Tax certainty and BEPS... 29

Re: Taxand Comments on the Clarification of the Meaning of 'Beneficial Owner' found in Articles 10, 11 and 12 of the OECD Model Tax Convention

OECD DISCUSSION DRAFT ON TRANSFER PRICING COMPARABILITY AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

Fair and Effective Taxation

September 14, Dear Mr. VanderWolk,

ADDITIONAL GUIDANCE ON ATTRIBUTION OF PROFITS TO PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENTS

Egypt Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 16 October 2018) General Information

CORPORATE TAX AND THE DIGITAL ECONOMY

Base Erosion and Profit Sharing Action Plan 11, 12, 14 & 15. Mr. S.P. Singh, Ex-IRS 7th November, 2015

OECD DISCUSSION DRAFT: FOLLOW UP WORK ON BEPS ACTION 6, PREVENTING TREATY ABUSE

OECD releases the United Kingdom peer review report on implementation of Action 14 minimum standards

OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations

Informal Ministerial Meeting on Responsible Business Conduct. 26 June 2014 OECD Château Room C Paris, France

Consequences of BEPS for the investment climate in each of the Benelux Counties. Chair: Machiel Lambooij. IFA Trilateral Liège 12 June 2015.

Korea Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 02 April 2018) General Information

OECD TP Guidelines July 2017 Brief synopsis

G20 DEVELOPMENT WORKING GROUP

OECD issues Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS)

A MULTILATERAL AGREEMENT ON INVESTMENT

Selected Issues in Tax Administration of Japan

Copenhagen Economics welcomes the opportunity to comment on the OECD s Discussion Draft on BEPS 8-10, Financial transactions, issued on 3 July 2018.

Slovenia Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 01 May 2018) General Information

We would like to confirm that have no objections with posting our comments on the OECD website.

Comments on the Discussion Draft on Transfer Pricing Comparability Data and Developing Countries

OECD releases Singapore s peer review report on implementation of Action 14 minimum standard

Expanding the Tax Base in Kenya: A Case for Innovation

A Guide To Changes In Irish Tax Rules

OECD releases Italy peer review report on implementation of Action 14 Minimum Standards

IFA MUNICH. Strategic Approaches to Global Transfer Pricing Risk: the use of tax treaties through APA and MAP. 18 January 2018

Tax Strategy for The Bahamas as an IFC 2 March 2018

BASE EROSION PROFIT SHARING INITIATIVE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR THE BAHAMAS

Table of Contents. Part One Introduction. Part Two VAT/GST Double (Non-)Taxation and Possible Remedies. Chapter 2: VAT/GST Double (Non-)Taxation 27

William Morris Chair, BIAC Tax Committee 13/15, Chaussée de la Muette, Paris. France

Korean Tax Update BEPS Implementation

Double Taxation Cases Outside the Transfer Pricing Area

Transfer pricing. Emerging issues in T.P. Handling KRA audits regarding T.P. Resolving T.P disputes

LIVE WEBCAST UPDATE ON BEPS PROJECT 2015 DELIVERABLES AND BEYOND. 8 June :00pm 6:00pm (CET)

International Investment Agreements: Strategies and Content

IMF Revenue Mobilizations and Development Conference: Session on Business Taxation. Alan Carter (ITD) Washington DC, April 18, 2011

BEING A GOOD BUSINESS - OUR APPROACH TO TAX

OECD releases Germany peer review report on implementation of Action 14 Minimum Standards

International Compliance Assurance Programme. Pilot Handbook. Working Document

VOLUME 18, NUMBER 1 >>> JANUARY 2016

Transfer Pricing Perspectives: The new normal: full TransParency. The post BEPS world in the automotive industry

BASE EROSION AND PROFIT SHIFTING ISSUES : THAILAND

Bulgaria Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 16 December 2016)

Global Transfer Pricing Review kpmg.com/gtps

Corporate tax and the digital economy Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation

Contents. Overview of integrity measures Multinational (MNE) anti-avoidance provision... 2

Transcription:

Tax Certainty EBF TAX CONFERENCE 2017 Brussels, 22 November 2017 Giorgia Maffini OECD s Centre for Tax Policy and Administration

Tax certainty Tax certainty report 1 delivered to G20 Finance Ministers with IMF, March 2017 We welcome the work on tax certainty conducted by the OECD and the IMF. We acknowledge the report on Tax Certainty submitted to us and encourage jurisdictions to consider voluntarily the practical tools for enhanced tax certainty as proposed in that report, including with respect to dispute prevention and dispute resolution to be implemented within domestic legal frameworks and international tax treaties. We ask the OECD and the IMF to assess progress in enhancing tax certainty in 2018 Chair of the Inclusive Framework has written to all subsidiary bodies 1. www.oecd.org/tax/g20-report-on-tax-certainty.htm 2

The business survey The OECD Business Tax Certainty Survey Between 18 October and 16 December 2016 724 completed responses From firms with global HQ in 62 different jurisdictions And regional HQs in 105 different jurisdictions Wide consultation Survey was developed on basis of Tax Survey developed by OUCBT and ETPF Consultation with business, governments/tax administrations, civil society, academia 3

Business survey global HQs Global Headquarters 4

Top 20 countries, by HQ of respondents MNEs only 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 5

Business survey - regional HQs Regional Headquarters 6

Turnover (in USD) (1) (2) FT Global 500 Survey (Overall) No. of firms % No. of firms % Over USD 25 b 181 36.2% 61 8.4% Between USD 10b and USD 25b 126 25.2% 37 5.1% Between USD 500m and USD 10b 55 11% 123 17% Between USD 50m and USD 500m 0 0 123 17% Less than USD 50m 0 0 262 36.2% NR/No answer 138 27.6% 118 16.3% Total 500 100% 724 100% Turnover (in USD) FT Global 500 Survey (Overall) in USD million in USD million Mean 47,510 28,295 Median 25,229 99.7 Standard Deviation 62,069 443,044 Total 17,198,580 17,146,558 % Vs. FT Global 500 100% 99.7% 7

Respondents by position Current position/responsibilities No. of firms Percentage Director (or equivalent) of the tax department 332 46% Senior manager (or equivalent) of international tax issues Senior manager (or equivalent) of specific tax issues 115 16% 31 4% Government relations 24 3% Others 167 23% Missing 55 7.6% Total number of respondents 724 100% 8

Respondents by sector C MANUFACTURING 28% 32% K FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE ACTIVITIES G WHOLESALE AND RETAIL TRADE; REPAIR OF MOTOR VEHICLES AND MOTORCYCLES 7% 8% 12% 13% M PROFESSIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES Missing Other 9

Mean Top 5 business factors, by importance for investment 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.2 Corruption Political Certainty The overall tax environment Current and expected macroeconomic conditions in the country Labour costs 10

Top 5 business factors by importance for investment (financial sector only) 4.1 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.5 Corruption Political Certainty Efficient financial markets Availability and quality of digital infrastructure Cost of complying with regulations 11

3.9 Top 5 tax factors, by importance for investment 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.3 Uncertainty about the effective tax rate on profit The anticipated effective tax rate on profit Uncertainty about input tax credits, refunds, place of supply issues for VAT/GST purposes and/or uncertainty about the tax burden of other consumption taxes (e.g. excises, sales taxes, custom duties) The anticipated neutrality of VAT/GST (e.g through the availability of input tax credit, refund and other relief arrangements) or the tax burden of other consumption taxes (e.g. Excises, sales taxes, custom duties) Existence of tax treaties 12

Top 5 tax factors by importance for investment (financial sector only) 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.1 Uncertainty about the effective tax rate on profit The anticipated effective tax rate on profit Existence of tax treaties Uncertainty about input Uncertainty about the tax credits refunds place ability to effectively obtain of supply issues for VAT relief for withholding taxes GST purposes and or uncertainty about the tax burden of other consumption taxes e g excises sales taxes custom duties 13

Top 10 sources of tax uncertainty 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.1 Tax Administration Specific International Dimensions Dispute Resolution Legal Systems 3.0 Considerable bureaucracy to comply with tax legislation, including documentation requirements Unpredictable or inconsistent treatment by the tax authority Inability to achieve early certainty proactively through rulings or other similar mechanisms (e.g Advance Pricing Arrangement) Inconsistencies or conflicts between tax authorities on their interpretations of international tax standards (e.g on transfer pricing or VAT/GST ) Tax legislation not in line with the evolution of new business models Lack of expertise in tax administration on aspects of international taxation Lengthy decision making of the courts tribunals or other relevant bodies Unpredictable and inconsistent treatment by the courts Complexity in the tax legislation (e.g. different definition of permanent establisment for VAT/GST and CIT purposes) Unclear, poorly drafted tax legislation 14

Top 5 sources of tax uncertainty (financial sector only) 3.65 3.6 3.55 3.5 3.45 3.4 3.35 Unpredictable or Inconsistencies or conflicts inconsistent treatment by between tax authorities on the tax authority their interpretations of international tax standards e g on transfer pricing or VAT GST Considerable bureaucracy to comply with tax legislation including documentation requirements Tax legislation not in line with the evolution of new business models Unclear poorly drafted tax legislation 15

Top 10 tools to enhance tax certainty 4.10 4.05 4.00 3.95 3.90 3.85 3.80 3.75 3.70 3.65 3.60 Legal Systems Tax Administration Dispute Resolution 16

Top 5 tools to enhance tax certainty (financial sector only) 4.2 4.15 4.1 4.05 4 3.95 3.9 3.85 Detailed guidance in tax regulations Reduced frequency of changes in the tax legislation Changes in statutory tax system announced in advance Increased transparency from tax administrations in relation to their compliance approaches Reduction of bureaucracy to comply with tax legislation 17

Tools to support certainty in international tax Some innovative options received strong support Multilateral Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs ) 36% of respondents say very important and extremely important This figure is 44% when we only consider MNEs Multilateral audits 25% of respondents say very important and extremely important Multilateral cooperative compliance programmes 31% of respondents say very important and extremely important This figure is 36% when we only consider MNEs 18

The tax administration survey (1) The OECD/FTA Tax Certainty Survey of Tax Administrations Conducted with members of the Forum on Tax Administration (FTA) Allow tax administrations to respond to results of business survey Is tax certainty a priority for tax administrations? What creates uncertainty for tax administrations? Which measures effective in increasing certainty? 25 OECD and G20 countries 19

The tax administration survey (2) The OECD/FTA Tax Certainty Survey of Tax Administrations Tax certainty is a high priority for tax administrations too Over 80% of respondents: very high/extremely high priority for tax administration Tax administrations recognise tax uncertainty important concern for business For tax administration, an important source of tax uncertainty is taxpayers behaviour, especially when involving aggressive tax planning 20

N.A. Top 10 sources of tax uncertainty 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Bureaucracy Business perspective Inconsistent treatment by the tax authority Inconsistent Lengthy interpretation decision making of international of the courts tax standards Tax Administration perspective Complexity in the tax legislation Tax legislation not in line with evolution of new business models Inconsistent treatment by the courts Unclear, poorly drafted tax legislation Tax Administration's lack of expertise on international taxation Inability to achieve early certainty proactively 21

4.5 Top 10 tools to enhance tax certainty controlled by the tax administration 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Reduction of bureaucracy Business perspective Efficient Increased communication transparency in with taxpayers relation to compliance / risk assessment Mutual agreement procedures Tax Administration perspective Timely communication during tax audits Simplified approaches for tax compliance Multilateral APAs Domestic cooperative compliance programmes Unilateral APAs Multilateral cooperative compliance programmes 22

Dispute prevention Practical solutions Taxpayer Cooperative compliance programmes bi/multilateral unilateral APA bi/multilateral unilateral Co-ordinated audits (joint, simultaneous abroad) Filing of tax return MAP Arbitration Dispute resolution (BEPS) Tax certainty 23

TRACE: common standard for source country taxation Standardised system for claiming withholding tax relief at source on portfolio investments Developed jointly with business and adopted in January 2013 and subsequently aligned to Common Reporting Standard (CRS) in 2015 Based on CRS infrastructure and technical solutions 24

TRACE: is it important for investors? OECD 2016 business survey For multinationals investment and location decisions, existence of treaties between countries 2 nd most important feature of the tax system, after certain corporate tax environment and before level of corporate taxation 3 rd most important factor for the financial sector Streamlined and effective withholding tax relief reclaim systems : 59% of the respondents in financial sector rated such factor as very or extremely important to resolve uncertainty 25

Context and key drivers Why now? 1. Improves tax certainty 2. Reinforces CRS 3. Lower implementation cost 4. Policy coherence 5. Request from business Improves tax certainty and addresses such uncertainty created by BEPS action 6 Adopting TRACE assists in the implementation of the CRS and makes it stronger With the introduction of the CRS, TRACE can be done more easily and at lower cost One standard for residence country reporting (CRS) combined with one for source country reporting (TRACE); based on same infrastructure for overall efficiency at lowest possible cost to all Addresses clear and consistent request from business, worried about compliance costs 26

TRACE: where are we? OECD working on its technical implementation Until recently, actual country implementation on hold: both governments and business busy implementing CRS and FATCA 27

Contact details on TRACE Philip KERFS Centre for Tax Policy and Administration 2, rue André Pascal - 75775 Paris Cedex 16 Tel: + 33 (01) 45 24 93 52 Philip.KERFS@oecd.org www.oecd.org/tax 28

Contact details Giorgia Maffini Deputy Head of the Tax Policy and Statistics Division Centre for Tax Policy and Administration 2, rue André Pascal - 75775 Paris Cedex 16 Tel: +33 1 45 24 15 14 Giorgia.Maffini@oecd.org www.oecd.org/tax 29