ASC 715 for Pensions: What Your Clients and Their Auditors Need to Know. Raymond D. Berry, MSPA, ASA, EA, MAAA Grant Thornton LLP

Similar documents
Workshop 25: Company Financial Statements Accounting for Pension Plans. Lauren R. Okum, ASA, EA, MAAA, MSPA Premier Actuarial Solutions, Chicago, IL

ASC 715 and OPEB Valuation

ACOPA Actuarial Symposium Workshop 6 New Mortality Tables: Their Use and Applications. August 8, 2015

Plan Curtailments and Settlements Under FASB ASC Topic 715 Relating to Plan Terminations (Part 2) By Daveyne C. Totten, MAAA, MSPA, EA

Plan Curtailments & Settlements Under FASB ASC Topic 715 Relating to Plan Terminations (Part 1) By Daveyne C. Totten, MAAA, MSPA, EA

Pension Accounting Research Series 2018 UPDATE FOR 2017 DISCLOSURES. By Jon Waite, SEI Institutional Group. seic.com

Implications of Mortality Improvements

Reducing Retirement Plan Risk in a Volatile Market

What is your funded status goal?

CITY OF HOLLYWOOD GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2012

Financial Reporting Considerations Related to Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

Market at a glance: MassMutual s defined benefit market update and commentary. September 30, 2018

TOWN OF LANTANA POLICE RELIEF AND PENSION FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2016

Actuarial Report Ontario Power Generation Inc. Report on the Estimated Accounting Cost for Post Employment Benefit Plans for Fiscal Years 2013 to 2015

TOWN OF LANTANA POLICE RELIEF AND PENSION FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2014

RET DAU Model Solutions Fall 2015

The Town of Middletown Pension Plan

M I N N E S O T A S T A T E R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M J U D G E S R E T I R E M E N T F U N D

CITY OF CLEARWATER EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF JANUARY 1, 2016

Proposed FASB Statement on Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans

OVERVIEW INDEX. Our PwC specialists from the National Office and the Human Resource Services (HRS) practice discuss the following topics:

February 6, Ms. Donna Simon Manager, Benefits and Labor Accounting Duke Energy Corporation 550 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202

ACOPA Symposium 2014 Actuarial Assumptions. Norman Levinrad, EA, FSPA, MAAA. Summit Benefit & Actuarial Services, Inc.

ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, City of Plantation Police Officers Retirement System

Society of Actuaries Finalizes New Mortality Assumptions

P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A L O C A L G O V E R N M E N T C O R R E C T I O N A L S

MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM STATE PATROL RETIREMENT FUND

RET DAU Model Solutions Spring 2016

How to Properly De-Risk Your Plan A Rainbow of Options

February 3, Experience Study Judges Retirement Fund

RET DAU Model Solutions Spring 2017

3-6 Principal Valuation Results 7-8 Expected Termination from Active Employment 9-10 COMMENTS AND CONCLUSION. Data Furnished for Valuation

ORLANDO UTILITIES COMMISSION PENSION PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2016

The New York State Teamsters Conference Pension and Retirement Fund Application for Suspension of Benefits under MPRA EXHIBIT 21

Global Pension Risk Survey 2017

THE GENERAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT

Minnesota State Retirement System. State Patrol Retirement Fund Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2017

Schedule SB Attachments

ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, City of Plantation General Employees Retirement System

Pension derisking: Start with the end in mind

City of Clearwater Employees Pension Plan Actuarial Valuation Report as of January 1, 2018 Annual Employer Contribution for the Fiscal Year Ending

Pension Risk Management Insurance Sector. Tim Geddes, FSA, EA, MAAA Director, Deloitte Consulting LLP

SOAI Pensions Accounting Seminar 14 November Brian Mulcair FSAI

Dan Sherman, ASA, MAAA Sherman Actuarial Services, LLC

Metropolitan Transit Authority Non-Union Pension Plan

Workshop 1: Variable Annuity Plans

Actuarial Valuation Report: The City of Newport, Rhode Island Post Retirement Benefits Plan as of July 1, 2013

RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS GASB 45 ACTUARIAL VALUATION

County of Volusia Volunteer Firefighters Pension System Actuarial Valuation Report as of October 1, 2017

Supplemental Materials for Q4 and FY 2011 Earnings Conference Call January 6, 2012

Workshop 10: Significantly Overfunded and Underfunded DB Plans

February 7, Mr. David Dye Duke Energy Corporation 550 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202

SPRINGFIELD FIREFIGHTERS PENSION FUND

General Employees Retirement Plan

City of Hollywood General Employees Retirement System ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2016

Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, 2010

Metropolitan Transit Authority Union Pension Plan

December 2, Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota General Employees Retirement Plan St. Paul, Minnesota

November Minnesota State Retirement System State Patrol Retirement Fund St. Paul, Minnesota. Dear Board of Directors:

***ADDENDUM TWO*** REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) Post Employment Benefits Other than Pensions Actuarial Valuation June 15, 2018

CITY OF TALLAHASSEE PENSION PLANS ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2016

Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Employees Retirement System

Attachment #3. Fire and Police Pension Association

Bert Fish Medical Center, Inc.

City of. icipal Police 30, 2019

CITY OF OCALA GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2015

Actuarial Valuation as required under LKAS 19

State Universities Retirement System of Illinois

Ohio Police & Fire. Pension Fund. Investigation of Demographic and Economic Experience. Conduent Human Resource Services. Five-Year Period from

CITY OF HAINES CITY GENERAL EMPLOYEES' PENSION PLAN SECTION , FLORIDA STATUTES COMPLIANCE

State Universities Retirement System of Illinois. GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions as of June 30, 2017

Understanding Pension Risk Management Arthur M. Scalise, ASA, EA, FCA Managing Actuary, Cammack Retirement Group

PENSION PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF BROWARD HEALTH. Actuarial Valuation Report For the Plan Year July 1, June 30, 2017

December 1, Minnesota State Retirement System State Employees Retirement Fund St. Paul, Minnesota. Dear Board of Directors:

City of Madison Heights Police and Fire Retirement System Actuarial Valuation Report June 30, 2017

Postemployment Health Insurance -- Sensitivity Tests Sensitivity Analysis RETIREE PREMIUM RATE DEVELOPMENT

ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT

DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN WORKSHOP: Guide Your Frozen Plan to Termination

TOWN OF SUDBURY OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PROGRAM ACTUARIAL VALUATION

US Pension Reform Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA)

Statement of Statutory Accounting Principles No. 89. Accounting for Pensions, A Replacement of SSAP No. 8

RET DAC Model Solutions Fall 2014

P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A

Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund

RET DAC Model Solutions Spring 2016

Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota Public Employees Police and Fire Plan GASB Statements No. 67 and No. 68 Accounting and Financial

VILLAGE OF CARPENTERSVILLE CARPENTERSVILLE POLICE PENSION FUND. Actuarial Valuation Report. For the Year. Beginning January 1, 2016

City of Marine City Retirement

CITY OF OCALA POLICE OFFICERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2015

CITY OF MOUNT DORA GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2014

Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association

City of Manchester Employees Contributory Retirement System GASB Statement No. 74, Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefit Plans Other Than

ON FO OY OR B R YE AS NT N P R TO N PL EP O LO PO Y T

ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF BOSTON PENSION PLAN FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2017 AND 2016

ALSIP ELEMENTARY SD 126 REGULAR

P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A

CITY OF NAPLES FIREFIGHTERS PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2016

CITY OF ST. CLAIR SHORES RETIREE HEALTH CARE PLANS

City of Ann Arbor Employees' Retirement System. Actuarial Valuation and Report June 30, 2018

Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands

Transcription:

ASC 715 for Pensions: What Your Clients and Their Auditors Need to Know Raymond D. Berry, MSPA, ASA, EA, MAAA Grant Thornton LLP

Agenda NOT ASC 960 ASC 715 overview focus on qualified defined benefit plans Also applies to non-qualified and foreign plans My viewpoints on best practices You, your clients, and their auditors should communicate, often before any actuarial valuations are performed 2

ASC 715 ASC = Accounting Standards Codification ASC 715 compensation retirement benefits, reflected on plan sponsors financial statements Annual pension expense = net periodic benefit cost P&L Annual disclosures = PBO less assets, etc. balance sheet 3

Pension Benefit Obligation PBO = present value of accrued benefits, but reflecting salary increases through retirement ABO = present value of accrued benefits Similar to funding target PBO less assets = funded status and on balance sheet 4

Service cost Net Periodic Benefit Cost Interest cost Expected return on assets Amortization Transition asset/obligation Prior service cost/credit (plan amendments) Actuarial gain/loss (includes changes in assumptions) 5

Net Periodic Benefit Cost Smoothing Transition and prior service costs are amortized over future years, not fully reflected immediately Cumulative actuarial gains/losses outside of corridor of greater of PBO and assets amortized over average working lifetime of actives Smoothed asset value allowed, ten-percent corridor 6

Net Periodic Benefit Cost Smoothing Portion of funded status not yet recognized in income is recognized on balance sheet as accumulated other comprehensive income Will be recognized over time 7

Mark to Market Acceptable to recognize gains and losses faster, even immediately Will increase volatility of NPBC But could use hedging or other investment strategies to lessen volatility 8

Mark to Market Why? If losses outside of corridor, must gradually be recognized anyway, taking hit now perhaps give analysts a better picture of company performance If terminating plan in near future, take the hit, or most of hit now Transparency 9

Actuarial Assumptions Should be best estimate IRS prescribed assumptions are not necessarily best estimate Technically responsibility of plan sponsor Expected input from actuary and/or auditors Auditor must confirm in accordance with U.S. GAAP 10

Discount Rate Based on high-quality corporate bonds as of measurement date Government bonds may be necessary in some countries Rates as of the measurement date not average for month or longer Cash flow matching of expected benefit payments with appropriate yield curve and solve for single equivalent rate Calculation similar to determination of EIR for funding purposes 11

Discount Rate (continued) Various acceptable yield curves Citigroup commonly used Most larger actuarial firms have their own pension curves Bond matching also used 12

Discount Rate (continued) Preferable a separately determined rate for each plan Best practice Spinoffs Common to use qualified plan rate for SERP, but Often equal to ASC 960 interest rate if using alternative settlement rate approach under ASC 960 Negatives rates? Europe how to handle? 13

Discount Rate Spot-Rate Approach Use individual spot rates instead of single equivalent rate Lowers service cost and interest cost and therefore net periodic benefit cost Approach is more refined, theoretically correct, and more precise PBO does not change only impacts NPBC 14

Discount Rate Spot-Rate Approach SEC will not object Prospective change only Considered a change in estimate 15

Discount Rate Spot-Rate Approach Must be considered a preferred method Therefore, permanent change, and perhaps required for all plans Must disclose effect of this change About 30 percent of Fortune 1,000 companies with DB plans have adopted 16

Discount Rate Spot-Rate Approach Smaller gains and larger losses occur (upward yield curve) Larger losses amortized over future years Spot-rate approach considered incompatible with bondmatching approach to discount rate determination 17

Expected Long-Term Rate of Return Not involved in determination of PBO May be equal to interest rate under ASC 960 similarly defined Based on expected returns weighted by asset class allocation Building-block approach investment consultant for expected returns by class 18

Expected Long-Term Rate of Return Trend is downward roughly from 8.0 to 8.5 percent range to 7.0 to 7.5 percent range Expected return by assets class has decreased? Asset allocation more conservative Frozen plans glide path Risk averse post-2008 19

Salary Increases Need at least some input from plan sponsor Needed for PBO but not ABO or hard-frozen plans Roughly from 4.0 to 4.5 percent range to 3.5 to 4.0 percent range Very plan-specific 20

Mortality Far more scrutiny last few years Best estimate not IRS prescribed tables RP-2014 with MP-2014/MP-2015 and perhaps MP-2016 Society of Actuaries may produce annual updates ASOP improvement scale 21

Several versions of RP-2014 Collar, income, headcount Mortality If cash balance plan, far less important Non-cash balance lump sum conversion mortality? Current 415(e) table - prescribed by law and plan document Project mortality improvement as for annuities 22

Mortality ASC 855 subsequent events audited financial statements should reflect all available information through the date the accounting firm signs the audited financial statements Recently required some rerunning of disclosures 23

Mortality Description of mortality assumption more complicated Are these the same table? RP-2006 mortality table with fully generational projection using scale MP-2015 RP-2014 mortality fully generational using projection scale MP-2015 RP-2015 projected with scale MP-2015 RP-2014 adjusted to reflect scale MP-2014 from the 2006 base year and projected forward using scale MP-2015 on a fully generational basis 24

Retirement Rates Depending on plan provisions, retirement decrements may be preferred over single age Less need for decrements if early retirement benefits are actuarial equivalent or approximately so Recently ultimate 100 percent decrement rate at age 70. Decrement critical if early retirement subsidy, supplements, or OPEB plan 25

Withdrawal/termination Other Assumptions Marital status and spouse s age COLA Cash balance interest crediting rate Optional forms particularly portion opting for lump sums 26

Plan freezes soft and hard Special Events Vested terminated participants lump-sum windows Annuity buyouts usually retirees Curtailment and/or settlement accounting required in some cases 27

Soft-Plan Freeze Soft-plan freeze no immediate accounting impact Be certain plan sponsor understands this PBO could increase even with no change in discount rate mostly actives Duration of plan likely to decrease and therefore discount rate to decrease over time 28

Hard-Plan Freeze Hard-plan freeze immediate accounting impact Be certain plan sponsor understands this and provide estimated impact no surprises PBO could increase even with no change in discount rate mostly actives, but less likely than soft freeze Duration of plan likely to decrease and therefore discount rate to decrease over time 29

Annuity Purchase and Lumps Sums Both have immediate settlement accounting impact possible Be certain plan sponsor understands this and provide estimated impact no surprises Estimate ongoing impact if annuity purchased Estimate impact of lump-sum window plan duration could decrease also could limit to avoid settlement accounting 30

Curtailments An event that significantly reduces expected years of service for actives or eliminates the accrual of benefits for a significant number of actives Rule of thumb on significant : Ten percent curtailment Five to ten percent maybe Less than five percent not a curtailment Plan hard freeze generally requires curtailment accounting, soft freeze does not Impacts both balance sheet and P&L 31

Curtailments If net effect of curtailment is a loss, should be recognized as soon as probable, and the results can be reasonably estimated. If net effect is a gain, should be recognized when curtailment occurs, which could be date the employees are terminated or the date the pension is suspended, amended, or terminated. 32

Settlements A transaction that is irrevocable Relieves the employer (or the plan) of primary responsibility for a pension obligation and plan assets used to affect the settlement Paying lump sums may trigger settlement accounting (lump sums greater than sum of SC and IC) Impacts both balance sheet and P&L 33

Settlements Settlement gains and losses are recoded when the settlement occurs (annuities purchased, lump sums paid, or pension obligation is assumed by someone else) Maximum amount should be recognized in earnings if entire PBO is settled. If only part of PBO is settled, should recognize in earnings a pro-rata portion equal to the percentage reduction in the PBO 34

Buy-Ins Annuity purchased by plan, not plan sponsor A plan asset Not settlement accounting Several accounting treatments possible need to value both the value of the annuity as well as the PBO for covered group 35

Recent FASB Pronouncements Additional disclosures on valuation of plan assets 52/53-week fiscal years now have practical option Use month-end nearest fiscal-year end Contributions and significant events between dates need to be recognized 36

Hints for Dealing With Auditors Providing some information upfront may lessen questions from auditors 37

Hints for Dealing With Auditors Separate periodic benefit payments and lump-sum payments Label what amendments are reflected in PVAB/PBO Details of gain/loss by source 38

Hints for Dealing With Auditors Rationale for each significant assumption or assumption changes ASOP 27 and 35 anyway Reviewing actuary and responding actuary 39

Questions? 40

41