Norway Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 30 September 2017) General Information

Similar documents
Paraguay Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 27 June 2017)

Macau (China) Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 29 June 2017) General Information

Bulgaria Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 16 December 2016)

St. Kitts and Nevis Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 09 May 2018) General Information

Saudi Arabia Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 25 January 2017)

Thailand Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 18 September 2017) General Information

Maldives Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 29 November 2018) General Information

The Independent State of Papua New Guinea Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: )

Kenya Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 15 February 2018) General Information

Slovenia Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 01 May 2018) General Information

Thailand Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 12 June 2018) General Information

Switzerland Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 1 September 2016) General Information

Austria Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 31 October 2017) General Information

Argentina Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 1 September 2016) General Information

Switzerland Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 24 August 2018)

Mauritius Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 19 April 2017) General Information

Korea Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 02 April 2018) General Information

Georgia Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 16 December 2016)

Egypt Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 16 October 2018) General Information

Denmark Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 20 June 2017) General Information

Brazil Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 13 February 2019) General Information

Guide for mutual agreement procedure pursuant to tax treaties (MAP) Contents

Republic of Korea Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 30 August 2017) General Information

Photo credits: Cover Rawpixel.com - Shutterstock.com

Photo credits: Cover Rawpixel.com - Shutterstock.com

SOME RELEVANT TREATY ISSUES

Bilateral Advance Pricing Agreement Guidelines

Guidance for Taxpayers on the Mutual Agreement Procedure (Q&A)

BEPS Action 14: Make Dispute Resolution Mechanisms More Effective

OECD releases Germany peer review report on implementation of Action 14 Minimum Standards

Base Erosion and Profit Sharing Action Plan 11, 12, 14 & 15. Mr. S.P. Singh, Ex-IRS 7th November, 2015

OECD releases the United Kingdom peer review report on implementation of Action 14 minimum standards

ST/SG/AC.8/2001/CRP.15

Dispute Resolution: the Mutual Agreement Procedure

ROMANIA TRANSFER PRICING COUNTRY PROFILE

Making Dispute Resolution More Effective MAP Peer Review Report, Canada (Stage 1)

OECD releases Switzerland s peer review report on implementation of BEPS Action 14 minimum standards

BEPS Action 14: Making dispute resolution mechanisms more effective

SEC. 5. SMALL CASE PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE.01 General.02 Small Case Standards.03 Small Case Filing Procedure

SECTION 5. SMALL CASE PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE.01 General.02 Small Case Standards.03 Small Case Filing Procedure

ANNEX II CHANGES TO THE UN MODEL DERIVING FROM THE REPORT ON BEPS ACTION PLAN 14

Factsheet on the mutual agreement procedure May 2018

SP1/11 Transfer pricing, mutual agreement procedure and arbitration

Release of BEPS discussion draft: Make Dispute Resolution Mechanisms More Effective

Arbitration under Tax Treaties

OECD releases France peer review report on implementation of Action 14 Minimum Standards

NON-DISCRIMINATION IN BILATERAL TAX CONVENTIONS

IFA MUNICH. Strategic Approaches to Global Transfer Pricing Risk: the use of tax treaties through APA and MAP. 18 January 2018

OECD releases Italy peer review report on implementation of Action 14 Minimum Standards

OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations

OECD releases Singapore s peer review report on implementation of Action 14 minimum standard

OECD releases Luxembourg peer review report on implementation of Action 14 Minimum Standards

OECD releases the United States peer review report on implementation of BEPS Action 14 minimum standards

Chapter 2. Dispute Channels. 1. Overview of common dispute process

EUJOINTTRANSFERPRICINGFORUM PROCEDURAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ARBITRATION CONVENTION AND RELATED MUTUALAGREEMENT PROCEDURES

Contents. Introduction. International Transfer Pricing: Advance Pricing Arrangements (APAs)

Mutual agreement procedure based on Swiss double taxation agreements

Global Transfer Pricing Review kpmg.com/gtps

Exchange of Information and Collection of Taxes. BCAS January 2015

EU JOINT TRANSFER PRICING FORUM

BASE EROSION AND PROFIT SHIFTING

BEPS ACTION 15. Development of a Multilateral Instrument to Implement the Tax Treaty related BEPS Measures

Assistance in the Collection of Taxes (Article 27) and its Commentary. Article 27 ASSISTANCE IN THE COLLECTION OF TAXES 1

Tunisia. Total MAP Caseload. Average time needed to close MAP cases (in months) n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

Controversy Trends. EMA Tax Summit. London, September 2016

Foundation for International Taxation Jubilee Conference

Competent Authority Resolutions and APAs

NOTE ON DISPUTE RESOLUTION: PROPOSED NEW ARTICLE 25 COMMENTARY

Strategic Dispute Resolution in a Post-BEPS World

Global Transfer Pricing Review kpmg.com/gtps

Current TP Litigation Scenario Alternative Resolution Mechanisms MAP & APA August 2010

Global Transfer Pricing Review

Transfer Pricing Country Summary The Netherlands

PROTOCOL. Have agreed as follows:

EU JOINT TRANSFER PRICING FORUM

BEAT s Impact on Transfer Pricing Alternative Dispute Resolution

EBIT

OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project. Making Dispute Resolution More Effective MAP Peer Review Report, Spain (Stage 1)

ROMANIA. minimum of 25% of the number/value of shares or voting rights in the two entities.

Global Transfer Pricing Review

A&S. NewsHighlights. February OECD releases updated calendar for BEPS discussion drafts and public consultations

Tax Policy: Designing and Drafting a Domestic Law to Implement a Tax Treaty. Kiyoshi Nakayama Fiscal Affairs Department

BIAC Comments on the. OECD Public Discussion Draft: Draft Comments of the 2008 Update to the OECD Model Convention

Italy end inventory 100. Milestone 1 to End. Start to Milestone

Global Transfer Pricing Review

Transfer Pricing Country Summary Turkey

1. Codifies transfer pricing rules, relief and provides for advance pricing arrangement (APA) regime to cater for unilateral,

IRAS release of e-tax guide: Transfer Pricing Guidelines (Fourth edition)

Competent Authority Services Division International and Large Business Directorate Compliance Programs Branch Canada Revenue Agency

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS ASSOCIATION GENERAL RAPPORTEURSHIP COLOMBIA

DEPARTMENTAL INTERPRETATION AND PRACTICE NOTES NO. 45 RELIEF FROM DOUBLE TAXATION DUE TO TRANSFER PRICING OR PROFIT REALLOCATION ADJUSTMENTS

Germany. Transfer Pricing Country Profile. Updated October The Arm s Length Principle

Global Transfer Pricing Review kpmg.com/gtps

Increased taxpayer rights for tax dispute resolution under new EU Directive

Global Transfer Pricing Review

Revenue Arrangements for Implementing EU and OECD Exchange of Information Requirements In Respect of Tax Rulings

International Dispute Resolution: Global Perspectives and Opportunities GW-IRS Annual Tax Institute Washington, DC November 30, 2017

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 3 April 1996 Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques

Global Transfer Pricing Review kpmg.com/gtps

Cross-Strait Bilateral Investment Protection and Promotion Agreement

Transcription:

1 Norway Dispute Resolution Profile (Last updated: 30 September 2017) General Information Norway's tax treaties are available at: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/tema/okonomiogbudsjett/skatterogavgifter/skatteavtalermellomnorgeogandrestat/id417330/ MAP request should be made to: MAP requests in cases of transfer pricing and attribution of profits to permanent establishments: Central Tax Office for Large Enterprises ("Sentralskattekontoret for Storbedrifter") P.O. Box 1073 Valaskjold, NO 1705 SARPSBORG Tel: +47 69 24 42 00 APA requests: Central Tax Office for Large Enterprises ("Sentralskattekontoret for Storbedrifter") P.O. Box 1073 Valaskjold, NO 1705 SARPSBORG Tel: +47 69 24 42 00 MAP requests in cases of transfer pricing regarding tax payers subject to the Norwegian Special Tax on Petroleum Income: Ministry of Finance ("Finansdepartementet") Department for Tax Treaties and International Tax Affairs P.O. Box 8008 Dep, NO 0030 OSLO Tel: +47 22 24 44 31/33 / Email: postmottak@fin.dep.no axes ("Skattedirektoratet")

2 MAP requests in all other cases should be made to either the Ministry of Finance or the Directorate of Taxes: Ministry of Finance ("Finansdepartementet") Department for Tax Treaties and International Tax Affairs P.O. Box 8008 Dep, NO 0030 OSLO Tel: +47 22 24 44 31/33 / Email: postmottak@fin.dep.no Directorate of Taxes ("Skattedirektoratet") P.O. Box 9200 Grønland, NO 0134 OSLO Tel (abroad): +47 22 07 70 00 / (from Norway): 800 80 000 Email: You must go to www.skatteetaten.no/sendepost if you want to use email.

Norway Dispute Resolution Profile Preventing Disputes 3 A. Preventing Disputes 1. Are agreements reached by your competent authority to resolve difficulties or doubts arising as to the interpretation or application of your tax treaties in relation to issues of a general nature which concern, or which may concern, a category of taxpayers published? The agreements are published under the relevant country name in the list of tax treaties on https://www.regjeringen.no/no/t ema/okono miogbudsjett/skatterogavgifter/skatteavtalermellomnorgeog andrestat/id417330/ 2. Are bilateral APA programmes implemented? If yes: On the basis of Double Taxation Agreements equivalent to Article 25 of the OECD Model Tax Convention. a. Are rollback of APAs provided for in the bilateral APA programmes? The taxpayer or the Norwegian competent authority may request rollback of the APA as an appropriate mean of resolving a transfer pricing issue in earlier years. The facts and circumstances of the case will be considered to determine whether such a rollback is appropriate and feasible. b. Are there specific timeline for the filing of an APA request?

Norway Dispute Resolution Profile Preventing Disputes c. Are rules, guidelines and procedures on how taxpayers can access and use bilateral APAs, including the specific information and documentation that should be submitted in a taxpayer s request for bilateral APA assistance, publicly available? No Bilateral APA requests shall be submitted to: Central Tax Office for Large Enterprises ("Sentralskattekontoret for Storbedrifter"); P.O. Box 1073 Valaskjold; NO1705 Sarpsborg, Norway 4 d. Are there any fees charged to taxpayers for a bilateral APA request? e. Are statistics relating to bilateral APAs publicly available? Information is available on total number of APAs in stock, the number of applications received and the number of cases settled during the year. The information is available in the Transfer Pricing Report which is published by the Tax Directorate on an annual basis (in Norwegian only).

Norway Dispute Resolution Profile Preventing Disputes 5 3. Is training provided to your officials involved in the auditing /examination of taxpayers to ensure that any assessments made by them are in accordance with the provisions of your tax treaties? 4. Is other information available on preventing tax treatyrelated disputes? The Norwegian Tax Administration has comprehensive education for tax auditors. With regard to transfer pricing the work of the Norwegian Tax Administration is coordinated among units. A large number of meetings, workshops and seminars are conducted that conveys knowledge of substantive issues. In addition; quality assurance of domestic transfer pricing adjustments is carried out by a separate national unit (the "TP Board") staffed with senior personnel experienced in international tax matters. Notes: 1. An APA is an arrangement that determines, in advance of controlled transactions, an appropriate set of criteria (e.g. method, comparables and appropriate adjustments thereto, critical assumptions as to future events) for the determination of the transfer pricing for those transactions over a fixed period of time. (see definition of APA in the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations ( Transfer Pricing Guidelines )). 2. Situations may arise in which the issues resolved through an APA are relevant with respect to previous filed tax years not included within the original scope of the APA. The concept of rollback is further elaborated in paragraph 4.136 of Section F (Advance pricing arrangement) of Chapter IV of the Transfer Pricing Guidelines and in paragraph 69 of Section D.4.2 (Possible retrospective application ( Roll back )) of the Annex to Chapter IV (Guidelines for Conducting Advance Pricing Arrangements under the Mutual Agreement Procedure ( MAP APAs )) of the Transfer Pricing Guidelines. Simply put, the rollback of the APA is understood to mean that the outcome of the APA is applied to previous filed tax years not included within the original scope of the APA.

Norway Dispute Resolution Profile Availability and Access to MAP 6 B. Availability and Access to MAP 5. Are transfer pricing cases covered within the scope of MAP? 6. Are issues relating to the application of treaty antiabuse provision covered within the scope of MAP? 7. Are issues relating to the application of domestic antiabuse provision covered within the scope of MAP? Guidance is under development Guidance is under development Guidance is under development 8. Are issues where there is already an audit settlement between the tax authority and the taxpayer covered within the scope of MAP? Norway does not have legislation or formal regulation regarding audit settlements. If, however, a taxpayer and the tax offices during an audit have agreed upon the outcome of an audit, the taxpayer's access to MAP will not be precluded. 9. Are double taxation cases resulting from bona fide taxpayer initiated foreign adjustments covered within the scope of MAP? 10. Are there any other treaty related issues not covered under s/n 5 to 9 which are not within the scope of MAP?

Norway Dispute Resolution Profile Availability and Access to MAP 7 11. Are taxpayers allowed to request MAP assistance in cases where the taxpayer has sought to resolve the issue under dispute via the judicial and administrative remedies provided by the domestic law of your jurisdiction? Domestic remedies such as the administrative appeal process and/or court proceedings can be invoked independently and at the same time as invoking the MAP. The Norwegian competent authority will, however, ensure that a domestic remedy process and the MAP will not be handled in parallel in practice. Guidance is under development Often the taxpayer will submit a protective complaint/writ/map request to meet the time limits under a remedy and ask the Appeal Board, the juridical court or the competent authority not to proceed until the preferred remedy has been exhausted. Where the MAP is the preferred remedy, the taxpayer may revert to administrative appeal proceedings or court proceedings if a MAP is not concluded (provided that a protective complaint/writ has been made within the time limits). Where administrative appeal proceedings is the preferred remedy, the taxpayer may revert to MAP after the Appeal Board's decision has been made. Where juridical court proceeding is the preferred remedy, see the reply to question 12 below

Norway Dispute Resolution Profile Availability and Access to MAP 8 12. Are taxpayers allowed to request for MAP assistance in cases where the issue under dispute has already been decided via the judicial and administrative remedies provided by the domestic law of your jurisdiction? If the Norwegian Tax Authority's adjustment is confirmed in a juridical court decision, the taxpayer may still revert to MAP to relieve double taxation, provided that time limit for requesting MAP is met. However, in such cases, the Norwegian competent authority, as a matter of policy, will not deviate from the court decision. Guidance is under development 13. Are rules, guidelines and procedures on how taxpayers can access and use MAP, including the specific information and documentation that should be submitted in a taxpayer s request for MAP assistance, publicly available? No Guidance is under development 14. Are there specific timeline for the filing of a MAP request? In most Tax Treaties the timeline for filing a MAP is stated in the Article on MAP in the Tax Treaty. Guidance is under development 15. Are guidance on multilateral MAPs publicly available? 16. Are tax collection procedures suspended during the period a MAP case is pending? No The tax collection procedure is not suspended when a taxpayer disputes the taxation via administrative or judicial remedies

Norway Dispute Resolution Profile Availability and Access to MAP provided for in Norwegian domestic law. This also applies to MAP cases. 9 17. Are there any fees charged to taxpayers for a MAP request? 18. Is there any other information available on availability and access to MAP?

Norway Dispute Resolution Profile Resolution of MAP Cases 10 C. Resolution of MAP Cases 19. Are there any model timeframes for the steps taken by your competent authority from the receipt of a MAP case to the resolution of the case provided to taxpayers? No No internal timeframes, but for those presented in BEPS Action 14. 20. Are statistics relating to the time taken to resolve MAP cases publicly available? The statistics are available on the OECD website. 21. Is interest or penalties resulting from adjustments made pursuant to a MAP agreement waived or dealt with as part of the MAP procedure? Interest or penalties are not within the MAP as such. Where, however, the outcome of a MAP is an agreement where a previous Norwegian adjustment is repealed or reduced, interest claims and penalties (additional tax levied as a percentage of the tax escaped from Norwegian taxation) will be correspondingly repealed or reduced. 22. Are the roles and responsibility of the MAP office publicly available, for example, is the mission statement of the MAP office available in the annual report of the organisation? No 23. Is MAP arbitration a mechanism currently available for the resolution of tax treaty related disputes in any of your tax treaties? Three tax treaties in force have provisions on MAP arbitration. If not:

Norway Dispute Resolution Profile Resolution of MAP Cases a. Are there any legal limitations in your domestic law (for example in your constitution) to include MAP arbitration in your tax treaties? b. Does your treaty policy allow you to include MAP arbitration in your tax treaties? 10 24. Is the explanation of the relationship between the MAP and domestic law administrative and judicial remedies publicly available? If yes: No Guidance is under development a. Does the guidance specifically address whether the competent authority considers that it is legally bound to follow a domestic court decision in the MAP or will not deviate from a domestic court decision as a matter of administrative policy or practice? b. Does your treaty policy allow you to include MAP arbitration in your tax treaties? 25. Are taxpayers allowed to request for multiyear resolution through the MAP of recurring issues with respect to filed tax years? Guidance is under development Guidance is under development

Norway Dispute Resolution Profile Resolution of MAP Cases 10 26. Do all your jurisdiction s tax treaties contain a provision which would oblige your jurisdiction to make corresponding adjustments or to grant access to the MAP with respect to the economic double taxation that may otherwise result from a primary transfer pricing adjustment (i.e. is paragraph 2 of Article 9 of the OECD Model Tax Convention or the UN Model Double Taxation Convention included in all of your jurisdiction s tax treaties)? No 54 of our 93 tax treaties do not include paragraph 2 of Article 9. However, where a primary transfer pricing adjustment has been made in the other state, Norway grants access to MAP under article 25 even though Article 9 para. 2 is not included in the treaty. 27. Is there any other information available on resolution of MAP cases?

Norway Dispute Resolution Profile Implementation of MAP Agreements 11 information and guidance can D. Implementation of MAP Agreements 28. Where the agreement reached by your competent authority through the MAP process leads to additional tax to be paid by your taxpayer, is there publicly a vailable information on the timeframe the taxpayer could expect its tax position to be amended to reflect the agreement reached by the competent authority and/or for the additional tax to be paid? 29. Where the agreement reached by your competent authority through the MAP process leads to a refund of the tax due or paid by your taxpayer, are there publicly available information on the timeframe the taxpayer could expect its tax position to be amended to reflect the agreement reached by the competent authority and/or for a refund of the tax paid? 30. Are all mutual agreements reached through MAP implemented notwithstanding any time limits in your domestic law? 31. Is there any other information available on the implementation of MAP agreements? No