International Trade Bulletin

Similar documents
Re: Consulting Canadians on a possible Canada-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement

Budget 2016: New Rules Targeting Back-To-Back Arrangements

Insurance Bulletin. New OSFI Guideline on Operational Risk Management. September 2015

Economic Impact of Canada s Participation in the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership

Real Estate Bulletin

Ontario court provides clarification on requisitioned shareholders' meetings

Economy Report: Korea

Korea and the TPP: The Inevitable Partnership Jeffrey J. Schott Senior Fellow Peterson Institute for International Economics

Presented by Bob Sacco, GTA Trade & Customs Leader

Korea s FTAs: Current Status and Issues

5688/13 JPS/io 1 DGB 1 B?? EN

Statement to the Senate Standing Committee on Agriculture and Forestry

Economic Impact of Canada s Potential Participation in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

( ) Page: 1/10 TARIFF IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES COMMUNICATION FROM THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Comments in Response to Executive Order Regarding Trade Agreements Violations and Abuses Docket No. USTR

CETA: Opportunities for the United Kingdom 1. Discussion Paper

summary of directors duties under OSFI guidance

The European Union Trade Policy

Building the Asia Pacific Gateway Economy: The Role of Vancouver-based Professional Services Firms

Current and Potential Losses to the U.S. Pork Industry from Retaliatory Tariffs Focus on Mexico June 13, 2018 Background Tariff Details

JAPAN BRUNEI DARUSSALAM AUSTRALIA

Improving market access for agricultural. other preferential treatments

The 10 Most Important Issues General Counsel Should Know About Risk Transfer Involving Insurance

Canada makes changes to Investment Canada regime

FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS ANALYSIS

BRIEFING ON The TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (TPPA)

INSIDE KORUS FTA - A Five-year Achievement -

Trans- Paci*ic Partnership

Statement to the House of Commons Standing Committee on International Trade

The EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) Opening up a wealth of opportunities for people in Hungary

FROM A CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE. 61 st Annual EDCO Conference Toronto February 7, 2018

Economic Nationalism: Reality or Rhetoric? Ian Sheldon AED Economics Ohio State University. AAII Columbus Chapter November 8, 2017

VIA FAX to and to and

AUSTRALIA S POLICIES TOWARDS PROTECTION AND FREE TRADE

Benefits to U.S. Agriculture

Canada as a Trading Nation. INTS 101 Canada and the World

Services Trade: Essential Fuel for U.S. and Global Economic Growth

Factsheet: Trade in Goods

Introduction. Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, published last fall, gained insights from the relevant academic and policy

ON: Negotiating Objectives for a U.S.-European Union Trade Agreement. TO: Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. BY: U.S. Chamber of Commerce

overview FACT SHEET trans-pacific partnership TPP

CFRED The Trans Pacific Partnership Impact and Implications. Assessing the content from a business perspective

Demystifying Korea. Service sector opportunity for Australia under KAFTA

1. Record levels of American outward foreign direct investment from 2000 to 2009,

Exports to major trading partners and duties faced

The Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA)

Global Commerce Strategy: Prioritiesfor Canadian Business

CETA s Legal and Political Implications for the TTIP. David A. Gantz Samuel M. Fegtly Professor

Exports to major trading partners and duties faced

Legal Review of FTA Tariff Negotiations

Free Trade Agreements and the Multilateral Trade System. FTA and WTO/Harmonization /Developing Countries/Environment Mitsuo Matsushita

E. TAKING ADVANTAGE OF REGIONAL TRADE AND INVESTMENT AGREEMENTS

China / Australia Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA) Maximising Opportunities. December 2014

The Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement

India s Trade Policy and Global Trade Initiatives

ENHANCING TRADE AND INVESTMENT, SUPPORTING JOBS, ECONOMIC GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT: OUTLINES OF THE TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT

ANNEX ONE SINGAPORE 1. INTRODUCTION

International Trade Agreements and Emerging Markets

The People's Republic of China and the WTO: An Overview Two Years Later

CETA : The Canada-EU Agreement. A New Standard in Trade Liberalization

CANADA-KOREA FREE TRADE AGREEMENT

US Trade Policy Options in the Pacific Basin: Bigger Is Better

The EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) Opening up a wealth of opportunities for people in Germany

Thailand and TPP 30 November 2012 Apiradi Tantraporn, Executive Chairperson The International Institute for Asia Pacific Studies (INSAPS), Bangkok

Canada-EU Trade Agreement: Inching towards Implementation

Exports to major trading partners and duties faced

litigation bulletin dinner and drinks: BC court of appeal confirms nightclub accident not within scope of professional insurance November 2012

Doing International Business In British Columbia: The Competitive Advantage Presentation to Economic Development Association of BC

The Coalition s Policy for Trade

Trans-Pacific Partnership

DOMINICAN REPUBLIC TRADE SUMMARY IMPORT POLICIES FOREIGN TRADE BARRIERS -167-

REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS AND THE MULTILATERAL TRADING SYSTEM PREPARED BY THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION DISCUSSION PAPER FOR THE G20

How CETA Will Benefit

Exports to major trading partners and duties faced

Border Protection under Pressure - WTO Grensevern under press II - WTO

NAFTA and the Automotive Industry

THE TRADE WAR OF 2018 AN EXPLANATION OF RECENT TARIFFS

OVERLOOKED FACTS ABOUT

Session 5: In search of the meaningful market access what are the policy options for LDCs

Emeritus Professor Dr Zakariah Abdul Rashid. Executive Director Malaysian Institute of Economic Research

CANADA HONG KONG COUNTRY PROFILE NOTES. Michaël Lambert-Racine

Asia-Pacific Trade Briefs: Hong Kong, China

OTHER COUNTRIES AND AREAS. Chapter 11

Panama s Recent FTAs. Estif Aparicio Cartagena, Colombia April 20, 2009 Americas Regional Meeting 2009 INTERLAW

EUROPEAN UNION SOUTH KOREA TRADE AND INVESTMENT 5 TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE FTA. Delegation of the European Union to the Republic of Korea

International Trade Update

WRITTEN SUBMISSON OF THE NATIONAL FOREIGN TRADE COUNCIL

Study Questions. Lecture 1 Overview of the World Economy

Japan s FTA Strategy. August 7, Shujiro URATA Waseda University

Session 8 Simple analytical method for identifying an offensive l when negotiating an FTA: An example of Sri Lanka-China FTA negotiations

North American Free Trade Agreement & the Canadian Sugar Market

DOMINICAN REPUBLIC TRADE SUMMARY

State of Play in Trade Negotiations

Canada Gazette, 12 April 2003; volume 137, no. 15

FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EFTA STATES AND MEXICO

The Trade Effect of Korea-US FTA

COSTA RICA IMPORT POLICIES. Tariffs and Other Import Charges

European Union Centre of Excellence Policy Briefs University of Alberta. Number 1, 2014

SPECIAL REPORT India-EU FTA: Where is the Europe s Trade Agenda Headed? Kavaljit Singh. February 23, 2012

The EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) Opening up a wealth of opportunities for people in Denmark

Transcription:

March 2014 International Trade Bulletin The Long and Winding Road - Canada-Korea Free Trade Agreement Signed After a ten year rollercoaster negotiation, Canada and South Korea ( Korea ) signed the Canada-Korea Free Trade Agreement ( CKFTA ) on March 11 th, 2014. Korea is the third largest economy with whom Canada has signed a free trade agreement ( FTA ) 1. This Agreement should help Canadian businesses by leveling the playing field with other economies, such as the US and the EU, that are actively pursuing the growing Korean economy. From the Canadian perspective, the agricultural industry likely stands to benefit significantly from increased market access. Korea appears to be most pleased with improved market access for automobiles. Background of the Agreement Korea has recently become a very popular trading partner. In July 2011, the EU-South Korea Free Trade Agreement ( EUSKFTA ) came into force. In March 2012, the Korea-US Free Trade Agreement ( KORUS ) came into force. Australia concluded negotiations on its FTA with Korea in December 2013, and signature is expected in the coming months. 1 Behind the US and Mexico through NAFTA, and given that the Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement with the EU has not yet been ratified. McMillan LLP Brookfield Place, 181 Bay Street, Suite 4400, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 2T3 t 416.865.7000 f 416.865.7048 Lawyers Patent & Trade-mark Agents Avocats Agents de brevets et de marques de commerce Vancouver Calgary Toronto Ottawa Montréal Hong Kong mcmillan.ca

Page 2 Given the state of Korea s economy, these FTAs make good sense. Korea has a gross domestic product of $1.1 trillion USD 2, making it the 15 th largest economy in the world and the 4 th largest in Asia (behind only China, Japan and India). It is also growing. Over the last 30 years, Korea s economy has grown sixfold, with an impressive average annual growth rate of 6.5%. There is a widespread belief that these recent FTAs (particularly KORUS) have had a negative impact on Canadian exporters compared to competitors from the US or EU. Canadian exports to Korea dropped by approximately one-third, from $5.03 billion to $3.37 billion 3, in the two years since KORUS came into force. The Canadian government expects that the CKFTA will allow Canadian producers to regain lost markets as well as providing new opportunities. In particular, the Canadian government believes the Agreement will facilitate the inclusion of Canadian inputs into Korean products as part of their global supply chains. There are a number of procedural and drafting issues that will need to be resolved before final ratification of the Agreement; nevertheless, there are reports that the CKFTA could be in force in as little as one year from now. Improved market access Once the Agreement is fully implemented, Korea will remove tariffs from 98.2% of tariff lines that cover virtually all of its imports from Canada. In exchange, Canada will remove tariffs from 97.8% of tariff lines. Korea s average tariffs are currently 13.3%, while Canada s are 4.3%. Tariff removal will take some time to materialize, and will be asymmetrical, with each party s particular interests reflected in the timing of tariff reductions. 2 Per IMF, based on Gross Domestic Product by PPP. 3 Source: Statistics Canada Canadian International Merchandise Trade Database.

Page 3 To Korea, the removal of Canadian duties on Korean automobiles was a very important goal. In 2013, approximately one-third of Korean s exports to Canada ($2.3 billion of $7.3 billion) were passenger motor vehicles 4. Canada currently imposes a 6.1% MFN duty rate on such imports. The Canadian tariff on Korean automobiles will be stepped down in three phases: the first reduction when the Agreement enters into force, with the second and third cuts in each subsequent year. By contrast, Korea will remove its 8% tariff on Canadian automobiles immediately upon the Agreement entering into force. Tariff protection for the politically sensitive Korean agriculture sector will be phased out over a longer term than tariffs applied to Canadian manufactured goods. Once fully implemented, 86.8% of Korean tariffs on agricultural products will be eliminated. Key agricultural exports from Canada include beef and pork. In 2013, Korea s total imports of these products from all sources was approximately $2.4 billion, The opportunity for Canada to supply a larger share of these imports is seen as beneficial for Canadian producers. Duties on beef (fresh, chilled or frozen) currently stand at 40-72% and will be eliminated over 15 years. For pork (fresh, chilled, frozen), current duties of up to 25% will be eliminated over 5 to 13 years. Korea will maintain tariff protection on most dairy products, poultry and poultry products, ginseng and related products, rice and rice products, refined sugar and most tobacco products. On the Canadian side, 87% of Canadian agricultural tariffs will be eliminated. Duties will remain in place to protect supply managed industries (i.e. dairy, poultry and eggs). Other notable tariff reductions of benefit to Canadian producers include the elimination of duties on Canadian wines and spirits, 4 Per Statistics Canada, based on goods classified under Harmonized System heading 87.30.

Page 4 including Canadian whisky (currently 20%) and ice wine (currently 15%). Korea has also agreed to protect Canadian whisky and Canadian rye whisky as geographical indications under its intellectual property laws. Turning to metals and minerals, Korea will remove tariffs on 98.7% of metal and mineral tariff lines upon the Agreement s entry into force. The remaining tariffs will be eliminated within five years. Until such time, current duties ranging up to 8% will remain in place. Canada currently imposes virtually no tariffs on metal imports. Any existing duties will be removed upon mutual ratification of the CKFTA. Provisions other than market access for goods In addition to tariff reduction, the CKFTA also addresses: Trade in Services and Investment; Government Procurement; Intellectual Property; Dispute Settlement; and Environment and Labour. Korea has committed to providing improved access to its financial services sector. Given the strength of Canada s banking industry, this may represent a substantial opportunity. In regards to e- commerce, the parties have agreed that on entry into force, no duties will be charged on digital products that are transmitted electronically. While the CKFTA has provisions relating to government procurement, they largely affirm the parties commitments under the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement (including the amended version currently expected to come into force in April 2014). The CKFTA government procurement provisions do not

Page 5 apply to sub-national procurement, so no consultation with the Provinces or Territories was required. In addition to the protection of certain geographical indications relating to Canadian wine and spirits, the CKFTA also provides that Canada will recognize and protect terms such as Korean red ginseng, Korean white ginseng and Korean fresh ginseng. Canada and Korea have agreed on a flexible dispute resolution mechanism. The system will rely on the appointment of ad hoc panelists, rather than a fixed roster of candidates. An expedited process is also available for two classes of goods: automobiles and perishable goods (e.g. certain agricultural goods). The CKFTA hopes to promote openness and transparency in the dispute resolution process by allowing public attendance at hearings, and allowing intervener submissions from interested parties. The CKFTA provisions relating to the environment and labour largely re-affirm the parties existing obligations in multilateral agreements and under international standards. The CKFTA also contains provisions that ensure that parties not derogate from their environmental and labour obligations to promote trade or investment. Conclusion The recent signing of the CKFTA opens a significant international market opportunity for Canada, both because of the size of the Korean economy, and its continuing rapid growth. The CKFTA will remove disadvantages Canadian exporters have experienced in competing with US and EU producers who already benefit from preferential market access. The CKFTA will similarly provide advantages for Canadian exporters over foreign competitors from other jurisdictions that do not benefit from a free trade arrangement with Korea.

Page 6 New Canadian exporters interested in the Korean market should be aware that they should not expect instant results from the CKFTA. Entry into Asian markets generally requires an appreciation of cultural sensitivities that must be respected in order to take advantage of business opportunities. Canadian exporters should be prepared to invest some time and effort into developing relationships and building trust with potential Korean buyers. by Geoffrey Kubrick and Jonathan O'Hara For more information on this topic, please contact: Ottawa Geoffrey Kubrick 613.232.7171 Ext.129 geoffrey.kubrick@mcmillan.ca Ottawa Jonathan O'Hara 613.232.7171 ext.176 jonathan.ohara@mcmillan.ca a cautionary note The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained. McMillan LLP 2014