The Experts In Actuarial Career Advancement. Product Preview. For More Information: or call 1(800)

Similar documents
MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN

San Francisco Community College District Actuarial Study of Retiree Health Liabilities As of October 1, 2009

City of Gainesville Consolidated Police Officers and Firefighters Retirement Plan

Imperial Valley Community College District Actuarial Study of Retiree Health Liabilities As of September 1, 2011

MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN APPENDIX TO THE ANNUAL ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT DECEMBER 31, 2016

Post-Employment Benefits Other than Pension Actuarial Valuation

Acton-Boxborough Regional School District and Town of Acton

OPEB Preparing for Your Audit

ACTUARIAL REPORT. on the Pension Liabilities which CENTRA GAS MANITOBA INC. has as at DECEMBER 31, with respect to the

Total Compensation Systems, Inc.

***ADDENDUM TWO*** REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) Post Employment Benefits Other than Pensions Actuarial Valuation June 15, 2018

Total Compensation Systems, Inc.

FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS BY AUTHORITY OF COUNCIL EFFECTIVE DATE: NOVEMBER 14, Canadian Institute of Actuaries 1 Institut Canadien des Actuaires

Town of Medway. Copyright 2012 THE SEGAL GROUP, INC., THE PARENT OF THE SEGAL COMPANY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Total Compensation Systems, Inc.

CITY OF HOLLYWOOD GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2012

August 22, The Pension Board Redford Township Police and Fire Retirement System Redford Township, Michigan. Dear Board Members:

ACTUARIAL SURS2015. Letter of Certification. Actuarial Report. Analysis of Funding. Tests of Financial Soundness

Actuarial Assumptions:

What you should know about the new Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB) standard (GASB 75) WGFOA Spring Conference April 19, 2018

City of Harrisburg Postemployment Benefits Plan Actuarial Valuation as of January 1, 2012 Table of Contents

ACTUARIAL. 123 Solvency Test 124 Analysis of Financial Experience 124 Schedule of Funding Progress

Report on a Possible New Plan Design for the Shelby County Retirement System

MEMORANDUM. Current Plan (For eligible retirees hired prior to 1/1/2009 and retired prior to 7/1/2016)

City of Marine City Retirement

MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN APPENDIX TO THE ANNUAL ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT DECEMBER 31, 2014

RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS GASB 45 ACTUARIAL VALUATION

Phillips Retirement. Income Plan

Pension Plan of Town of West Warwick Management Summary of 7/1/2013 Actuarial Valuation

Total Compensation Systems, Inc.

March 26, The purpose of the valuation of the City of Eastpointe Employees Death Benefit Plan as of November 1, 2012 is to:

City of Marine City Retirement

June 19, Compute the City s recommended contribution rate for the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 2015.

Options to Address Unfunded Pension Liability

Total Compensation Systems, Inc.

Subject: Experience Review for the Years June 30, 2010, to June 30, 2014

February 27, The purpose of the annual actuarial valuation of the City of Auburn Hills Employee Pension Plan as of December 31, 2014, is to:

CITY OF ALLEN PARK EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

Total Compensation Systems, Inc.

Housing Trust Fund Corporation GASB 45 Valuation for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2011

PENSION PLAN OPTIONS. July 1, 2014 CITY OF MEMPHIS. Copyright 2014 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

Total Compensation Systems, Inc.

GASB 45 Actuarial Valuation of Postemployment Benefits Other than Pensions for TriMet. As of January 1, Prepared by:

March 25, Mr. Randall Blum Finance Director City of Eastpointe Eastpointe, Michigan Dear Mr. Blum:

September 15, Mr. Randall Blum Deputy Finance Director City of Eastpointe Eastpointe, Michigan Dear Mr. Blum:

Post-Retirement Medical Plan GASB 74/75 Financial Accounting Disclosure For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2018 November 2018

December Mr. Randall Blum Finance Director City of Eastpointe Eastpointe, Michigan Dear Mr. Blum:

February 3, Experience Study Judges Retirement Fund

Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement System

ACTUARIAL. Online information, a permanent home, new program options SURS celebrated 50 years of service.

Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement System

Key Benefit Concepts, LLC

Prepared by: Questar III - BOCES

Actuarial Valuation Report for Accounting Purposes on the Saskatchewan Teachers Superannuation Plan as at June 30, 2001

GASB 45 Actuarial Valuation of Postemployment Benefits Other than Pensions for TriMet. As of January 1, Prepared by:

City of Clearwater Employees Pension Plan Actuarial Valuation Report as of January 1, 2018 Annual Employer Contribution for the Fiscal Year Ending

METROPOLITAN TORONTO PENSION PLAN REPORT ON THE ACTUARIAL VALUATION FOR FUNDING PURPOSES AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2016 APRIL 2017

IPERS Actuarial Assumptions and Methods 2015

Pension Plan for Non-Unionized Employees of Quebecor Media Inc. and its Participating Subsidiaries

Report of the Actuary on the Valuation of the Georgia Firefighters Pension Fund

Actuarial Assumptions:

Retirement Plans for Executives and Senior Managers CIFPs Annual Conference. June 15, Broadlybased Plans. Senior Executives.

General Employees Retirement Plan

SESSION 1 THE ACTUARIAL METHODOLOGY OF PENSIONS. Presented by Victor Harte Milliman, Inc.

Actuarial SECTION. A Tradition of Service

Alameda County Employees Retirement Association

L A B O R E R S A N D R E T I R E M E N T B O A R D E M P L O Y E E S A N N U I T Y A N D B E N E F I T F U N D O F C H I C A G O ACTUARIAL VALUATION

June 5, Mr. Douglas B. Stansil Finance Director Racine County 730 Wisconsin Avenue Racine, WI 53403

County of Sonoma. Distributed to JLMBC on December 7, 2011

Cavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve. Assumption Previous Current. a select & ultimate rate of 2.25% and 2.

Police Officers Retirement Fund

ORLANDO UTILITIES COMMISSION PENSION PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2016

Total Compensation Systems, Inc.

TOWN OF LANTANA POLICE RELIEF AND PENSION FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2014

Metropolitan Transit Authority Non-Union Pension Plan

Public Service Pension Plan Actuarial Valuation as at December 31, Registration number: CRA

Proposed Plan Changes April 21, Thomas Pfeifle Executive Director

CITY OF FREEPORT ACCOUNTING FOR POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFIT PLANS UNDER GASB #45 FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING APRIL 30, 2017

April Metropolitan Toronto Police Benefit Fund. Report on the Actuarial Valuation for Funding Purposes as at December 31, 2009

Cavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve

Dan Sherman, ASA, MAAA Sherman Actuarial Services, LLC

Cavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve. Assumption Previous Current. a select & ultimate rate of 2.25% and 2.

Total Compensation Systems, Inc.

Actuarial Valuation Report: The City of Newport, Rhode Island Post Retirement Benefits Plan as of July 1, 2013

Ventura County Employees Retirement Association

TEXPERS Summer Forum. Retiree Healthcare Funding. April 15, Charles Dean, FSA. Dean Actuaries, LLC 74/75. The Big Picture

100 Montgomery Street, Suite 500 San Francisco, CA 94104

Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB)

THE UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA RETIREMENT PENSION PLAN REPORT ON THE ACTUARIAL VALUATION FOR FUNDING PURPOSES AS AT JANUARY 1, 2014

RET DAC Model Solutions Fall 2014

120 City and County of Denver Financial

Actuarial Valuation Report as of June 30, Maine Public Employees Retirement System Retiree Group Life Insurance. Presented by Cheiron

Healthcare Analytics Consulting. Actuarial Valuation of Postemployment Benefits as of Fiscal Year End June 30, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.

TOWN OF LANTANA POLICE RELIEF AND PENSION FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2016

October 13, 2016 Actuarial Valuation Report: The City of Newport, Rhode Island Post-Retirement Benefits Plan as of July 1, 2016

PRIVATE. August 7, Ms. Katie White Director of Fiscal Services MiraCosta Community College (MS #6) One Barnard Drive Oceanside, CA 92056

MERCER METROPOLITAN TORONTO POLICE BENEFIT FUND REPORT ON THE ACTUARIAL VALUATION FOR FUNDING PURPOSES AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2014

LINCOLN PARISH SHERIFF Ruston, Louisiana

Town of Scituate Retirement Plan for the Police Department Employees

New Mexico Retiree Health Care Authority

Transcription:

P U B L I C A T I O N S The Experts In Actuarial Career Advancement Product Preview For More Information: email Support@ActexMadRiver.com or call 1(800) 282-2839

Overview of Post-Retirement Risks ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 1

Risks Longevity Loss of spouse Decline in functional status Health care expenses Inflation Risk Management Start annuity later Strategies to preserve principal JS annuity / life insurance; Income producing investment strategies Long term care insurance Medical insurance; Medicare Homeownership; TIPS; COLA annuity Key Findings & Issues: Understanding and Managing the Risks of Retirement ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 2

Top Ranking of Risks by Pre-Retirees and Retirees ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 3

Rank Pre-Retirees Retirees 1 Health care affordability Inflation risks 2 Inflation risks Long term care affordability 3 Long term care affordability Health care affordability Pre-retirees more concerned about risks than retirees Key Findings & Issues: Understanding and Managing the Risks of Retirement ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 4

Post-Retirement Risks: Expectations and Approaches (1 of 2) ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 5

Inflation Interest Rate Stock Market Business Loss of spouse Marital status Public policy Health care affordability Cannot cut back on health care expenses Retirees constant review needs vs. resources Factor in unexpected events Long-term bonds / mortgage investment protect against low interest rate (reduce income) N/A ER bankrupt (Insurance only up to a limit) Few expect financial suffering A change often affect financial status Tax increase / Reduction in Social Security Pre-retirees w/o ER coverage difficult to secure adequate coverage Few expect using insurance products (other than supplemental health insurance) to manage risks ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 6

Post-Retirement Risks: Expectations and Approaches (2 of 2) ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 7

Health care affordability Pre-retirees w/o ER coverage difficult to secure adequate coverage Few expect using insurance products (other than supplemental health insurance) to manage risks Force into higher care level or w/o needed care Lack facilities or caregivers Lack decision Advisors from professional to family & friends, Tools making info e.g., living will / durable power of attorney Functional status Cannot live independently/change in housing need decline Expect increase use of family / community service Employment May not retire later as planned (Health issues / layoffs / forced early retirement) Not to rely on retirement income from bridge job Key Findings & Issues: Understanding and Managing the Risks of Retirement ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 8

Compensation Arrangements for Private Corporations (under ITA Prohibition against Deferral against Employment Income) ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 199

RPP (Bona fide pension plans are not SDA) If main goal is deferral, pension plan is safe harbour RCA not excluded from SDA rules (unless a funded unregistered plan) IPP (Can use to defer compensation) marked distrust from CRA Employee profit sharing plan cannot fund unregistered plan 3-Year bonus plan (Imm taxation if payment delayed beyond third year) If funded, EE benefit plan If unfunded, a tax nothing unless as investment contract Minor deferral gains 3-Year Bonus RCA for Expatriates (Not an SDA) Creative Compensation Arrangements for Private Corporations ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 200

CICA Section 3461 Substantive Commitments ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 201

Written or unwritten Mutually understood by ER and EEs For collectively bargained plan Existing plan is considered the substantive plan Reflect substantive plan provisions if Historical pattern exists, or ER has communicated its intent to EEs Cannot reflect expected changes in gov t benefits [.063] CICA 3461.047 -.065 ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 202

CICA Section 3461 - Actuarial Assumptions Basic Elements Retirement Age Termination Rates Dependent Status Discount Rate ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 203

Basic Elements 1 of 3 Explicit assumptions Management s best estimate Internally consistent Consistent across benefit plans Plans assumed going concerns, unless evidence otherwise Allow different assumptions for Pensions / Post-retirement benefits / Postemployment benefits Retirement Age Pension plan (Age 65 if actuarially equivalent early retirement benefits) Post-retirement benefits (Best use age-related retirement scale) ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 204

Demographic Assumptions ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 291

Comply with ASOP #35 Refine due to differences from pension obligations Are assumptions based on pension liability weighted experience appropriate? Disability (Consistent with coverage provided) Retirement Select explicit age-related retirements rates (not singe age) Mortality (Reflect future improvements) Use gender-specific mortality tables (vs. unisex) ASOP6 ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 292

Coverage Assumptions ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 293

Plan Participations Consider Eligibility rules, Plan choices, Contribution rates and changes Spouse and Dependent Coverage Use separate spouse coverage rates for males / females if future gender mix differ from current Spouse and Dependent Age - Use actual age if available ASOP6 ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 294

Considerations When Selecting a Cost Allocation Policy ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 295

Limits on Allocation Period (employment date to last retirement date assumed) Reasonableness of Allocation Basis produce orderly allocation Dedicated assets Amortization Method Cash Flow Adequacy Cost allocation policy should provide enough assets for benefits payments ASOP6 ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 296

Definition of Phased Retirement ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 349

Person working on reduced schedule on the career job before full retirement Exclude bridge job Currently no in-service access to retirement benefits allowed by legislation Issues for Implementing Phased Retirement in Defined Benefit Plans ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 350

Actuarial Equity of Phased Retirement ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 351

Should be cost neutral Full actuarial reduction for early retirement distributions Full actuarial increase for employment past NRA Traditional final average pay plan penalizes phased retiree Can be corrected through definitions of FAE Annualize pay during phased retirement years Use partial year in divisor of the final average pay fraction Use average of the highest X years of consecutive compensation Issues for Implementing Phased Retirement in Defined Benefit Plans, ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 352

Actuary Equity Illustration 1: No In-Service Distributions ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 353

Participant 1: Work full time and fully retire at 70 Participant 2: Work assumed phased retirement schedule Traditional final average pay model Participant 3: Work assumed phased retirement schedule Plan annualize pay during phased retirement Credit partial service year equal to portion of a full time schedule Participant 1 Participant 2 Participant 3 FAE at age 70 $130,021 $65,010 $130,021 Benefit at age 70 $ 70,763 $35,383 $ 66,342 Figures for illustration purposes only Issues for Implementing Phased Retirement in Defined Benefit Plans, ACTEX 2014 Retirement Benefits Design & Accounting: Canada Page 354