Partial Equilibrium Model: An Example. ARTNet Capacity Building Workshop for Trade Research Phnom Penh, Cambodia 2-6 June 2008

Similar documents
Gehrke: Macroeconomics Winter term 2012/13. Exercises

PARTIAL EQUILIBRIUM Welfare Analysis

Ninth ARTNeT Capacity Building Workshop for Trade Research "Trade Flows and Trade Policy Analysis"

Y t )+υ t. +φ ( Y t. Y t ) Y t. α ( r t. + ρ +θ π ( π t. + ρ

Economics 335 Problem Set 6 Spring 1998

Choice Probabilities. Logit Choice Probabilities Derivation. Choice Probabilities. Basic Econometrics in Transportation.

Intermediate Microeconomics

Foundational Preliminaries: Answers to Within-Chapter-Exercises

Credit Crises, Precautionary Savings and the Liquidity Trap October (R&R Quarterly 31, 2016Journal 1 / of19

Introductory Mathematics for Economics MSc s: Course Outline. Huw David Dixon. Cardiff Business School. September 2008.

General Equilibrium Analysis Part II A Basic CGE Model for Lao PDR

Unfunded Pension and Labor Supply: Characterizing the Nature of the Distortion Cost

Economics II - Exercise Session # 3, October 8, Suggested Solution

Chapter 10 THE PARTIAL EQUILIBRIUM COMPETITIVE MODEL. Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.

Economics 11: Solutions to Practice Final

Intro to Economic analysis

Eco504 Spring 2010 C. Sims MID-TERM EXAM. (1) (45 minutes) Consider a model in which a representative agent has the objective. B t 1.

Answers to Problem Set #8

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program August 2017

Government Debt, the Real Interest Rate, Growth and External Balance in a Small Open Economy

Major Themes in International Economics + Review of Microeconomic Concepts

ECON 4325 Monetary Policy and Business Fluctuations

Exam #2 Review Questions (Answers) ECNS 303 October 31, 2011

Answers to Odd-Numbered Problems, 4th Edition of Games and Information, Rasmusen. PROBLEMS FOR CHAPTER 14: Pricing

SYLLABUS AND SAMPLE QUESTIONS FOR MSQE (Program Code: MQEK and MQED) Syllabus for PEA (Mathematics), 2013

GS/ECON 5010 section B Answers to Assignment 3 November 2012

On Quality Bias and Inflation Targets: Supplementary Material

Problem Set 1: Trade Barriers under Perfect Competition - Answer Key

INTRODUCTORY ECONOMICS

Problem Set 1: Trade Barriers under Perfect Competition - Answer Key

Getting Started with CGE Modeling

. Fiscal Reform and Government Debt in Japan: A Neoclassical Perspective. May 10, 2013

Lastrapes Fall y t = ỹ + a 1 (p t p t ) y t = d 0 + d 1 (m t p t ).

Market Access and the Reform of State Trading Enterprises

Comprehensive Exam. August 19, 2013

Capital Income Tax Reform and the Japanese Economy (Very Preliminary and Incomplete)

PBAF 516 YA Prof. Mark Long Practice Midterm Questions

Public Good Provision: Lindahl Tax, Income Tax, Commodity Tax, and Poll Tax, A Simulation

Lecture 13 Price discrimination and Entry. Bronwyn H. Hall Economics 220C, UC Berkeley Spring 2005

Sheffield Economic Research Paper Series. SERP Number:

ALGEBRAIC REPRESENTATION

ECO 352 International Trade Spring Term 2010 Week 3 Precepts February 15 Introduction, and The Exchange Model Questions

ECONOMICS QUALIFYING EXAMINATION IN ELEMENTARY MATHEMATICS

1. Suppose the demand and supply curves for goose-down winter jackets in 2014 were as given below:

Quality, Variable Mark-Ups, and Welfare: A Quantitative General Equilibrium Analysis of Export Prices

Theoretical Tools of Public Finance. 131 Undergraduate Public Economics Emmanuel Saez UC Berkeley

Advanced Macro and Money (WS09/10) Problem Set 4

Mathematical Economics

Mathematical Economics dr Wioletta Nowak. Lecture 1

The test has 13 questions. Answer any four. All questions carry equal (25) marks.

Microeconomic Theory August 2013 Applied Economics. Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MICROECONOMIC THEORY. Applied Economics Graduate Program

PhD Qualifier Examination

Graduate Public Finance

X 410 Business Applications of Calculus

How Much Competition is a Secondary Market? Online Appendixes (Not for Publication)

Modelling Economic Variables

ECON 5113 Advanced Microeconomics

Chapter II: Labour Market Policy

Menu Costs and Phillips Curve by Mikhail Golosov and Robert Lucas. JPE (2007)

Aggregate Supply and Demand

UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL

Mathematical Economics Dr Wioletta Nowak, room 205 C

TFP Decline and Japanese Unemployment in the 1990s

Growth Effects of the Allocation of Government Expenditure in an Endogenous Growth Model with Physical and Human Capital

Chapter 8 A Short Run Keynesian Model of Interdependent Economies

Answers to Problem Set #6 Chapter 14 problems

Welfare-maximizing tax structure in a model with human capital

Simple Model Economy. Business Economics Theory of Consumer Behavior Thomas & Maurice, Chapter 5. Circular Flow Model. Modeling Household Decisions

Microeconomics 2nd Period Exam Solution Topics

Estimating Market Power in Differentiated Product Markets

is a concept that relates the responsiveness (or sensitivity) of one variable to a change in another variable. Elasticity of A with respect to B = %

Slideset 1: Chapters 1-4 Wolfgang Schwarzbauer

Economics 386-A1. Practice Assignment 2. S Landon Fall 2003

PAPER No. 2: MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS MODULE No.29 : AGGREGATE DEMAND FUNCTION

Lecture 1: The market and consumer theory. Intermediate microeconomics Jonas Vlachos Stockholms universitet

USO cost allocation rules and welfare

Dynamic Impacts of Trade Liberalization: In the Framework of Endogenous Growth with Productive Public Capital * Abstract

Choice Models. Session 1. K. Sudhir Yale School of Management. Spring

Macroeconomics 2. Lecture 6 - New Keynesian Business Cycles March. Sciences Po

Economics 230a, Fall 2017 Lecture Note 6: Basic Tax Incidence

ON INTEREST RATE POLICY AND EQUILIBRIUM STABILITY UNDER INCREASING RETURNS: A NOTE

Managing Wheat Price Volatility in India. Christophe Gouel, Madhur Gautam & Will Martin 18 September 2014

Assignment 1 Solutions. October 6, 2017

Non welfare-maximizing policies in a democracy

Review Questions. The Labor Market: Definitions, Facts, and Trends. Choose the letter that represents the BEST response.

Country Spreads as Credit Constraints in Emerging Economy Business Cycles

Labor Economics Field Exam Spring 2011

Oil Monopoly and the Climate

GS/ECON 5010 Answers to Assignment 3 November 2005

1. Consider the aggregate production functions for Wisconsin and Minnesota: Production Function for Wisconsin

For students electing Macro (8702/Prof. Smith) & Macro (8701/Prof. Roe) option

Competitive Markets. Market supply Competitive equilibrium Total surplus and efficiency Taxes and subsidies Price maintenance Application: Imports

ANSWERS FINAL 342 VERSION 1

The supply function is Q S (P)=. 10 points

Optimal Redistribution in an Open Economy

SAMPLE EXAM QUESTIONS FOR FALL 2018 ECON3310 MIDTERM 2

Midterm Exam #2 - Answers. March 27, 1997

TFP Persistence and Monetary Policy. NBS, April 27, / 44

WRITTEN PRELIMINARY Ph.D EXAMINATION. Department of Applied Economics. Spring Trade and Development. Instructions

Don Fullerton, University of Illinois Garth Heutel, UNC-Greensboro

Transcription:

Partial Equilibrium Model: An Example ARTNet Capacity Building Workshop for Trade Research Phnom Penh, Cambodia 2-6 June 2008

Outline Graphical Analysis Mathematical formulation Equations Parameters Endogenous variables Use of benchmark data Calibration (of parameters) Simulation

Reference François, Joseph and Reinert, Kenneth (eds.) 1997. Applied Methods for Trade Policy Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://www.intereconomics.com/handbook/ Models/Index.htm Domestic and foreign goods are perfect substitutes (Chapter 5) Domestic and foreign goods are differentiated (Chapter 5) Multi-market, multi-region models (Chapter 8)

The effects of a tariff The consumer surplus measures what consumers gain by buying a good at a certain price while they would have been willing to buy it at a higher price. Price The consumer surplus corresponds to the surface below the 12 demand curve and above the line indicating the equilibrium price 8 Quantity

The effects of a tariff The effect of a price reduction: Price Consumers were willing to pay 12 dollars for 8 units of the product, but at the price of 10 dollars they will buy 10 units The gain in consumer s212 surplus due to the 110 price reduction 0 is indicated by the blue surface prix 88 10 12 Quantity quantité

The effects of a tariff The producer surplus corresponds to what producers gain by selling products at a certain price while they would have been willing to sell them at lower prices. The producer surplus corresponds to the surface above the supply curve and below the line indicating the equilibrium price. Price 4 6 Quantity

The effects of a tariff The effect of a price increase on producers: Price Producers are willing to sell 6 units at the price of 4 dollars. At the higher price of 6 dollars 6 they sell 9 units. The gain in producer surplus 44 due to the price increase corresponds to the blue surface. prix 6 9 Quantity quantité

The effects of a tariff An import tariff increases the domestic price of the relevant good: Domestic producers of the relevant good gain Domestic consumers of the good lose; The collected tariffs represent revenue for the government. For the country the net effect of a tariff is negative (see chart)

The effects of a tariff Net loss induced by a tariff of size a Consumer loss: the entire coloured surface Producer gain: the blue surface Government revenue: the green surface p+a Net loss for the country: the two red triangles Price pp c1 c2 c3 c4 Supply Demand Quantity

General Case P w Deriving Import Demand Curve P M s Q s M d Q d World Market Q Domestic Market Q

General Case P w Determining world price and imports P M s P* w M d World Market Q

General Case Determining world price and imports P w M s M s P *(1+t) w P* w P * w C B A M d M M World Market Q

Algebraic Representation Domestic Demand: Q d = α(p) η Domestic Supply: Q s = β(p) ε Import Demand: M d = Q d Q s = α(p) η -β(p) ε Import Supply: M s = γ (P w ) θ Price Equation: P = (1+t)*P w

Algebraic Representation Equilibrium Condition: Import Demand = Import Supply α(p) η -β(p) ε = γ (P w ) θ... OR... Α(P w (1+t)) η β(p w (1+t)) ε - γ (P w ) θ = 0

Welfare Analysis To a first approximation, the welfare change from trade policy changes is equal to: dw = - M(dP w ) + (P-P w )(dm) Terms of trade effect Harberger triangles Areas C + B Areas A+B Areas A-C

Parameters PARAMETERS: α= Constant in demand function β = Constant in supply function γ = Constant in import supply function ε = Elasticity of supply η = Elasticity of demand θ = Elasticity of import supply t= Ad valorem tariff rate

Benchmark Data Parameters/Variables Qs 1,182.38 M 7,480.06 t 0% η -1.0 ε 3.0 θ 10.0 P 1.0 P w 1.0 Values

Calibration Parameters: η,ε and θ Benchmark Data: Q s, M d t =0 P =1 P w = 1 Constants: α = 1,182.38 β = 7,480.06 γ = 6,297.68

Simulation The model is now ready for simulating tariff policy changes Suppose tariff is increased from 0% to 20% What happens to imports? Production? Tariff revenues? Harberger triangles Terms of trade effect

Excel Solver

Calibration 1182.38 Benchmark sales of the domestic industry 7480.06 Benchmark total sales (domestic origin and imported) 3 ε: Elasticity of domestic supply -1 η: Elasticity of demand 10 θ: Elasticity of import supply 0.00% Initial tariff 20.00% New tariff 1.00 Benchmark domestic price Calibrated values 1,182.38β : domestic supply constant 7,480.06α: total demand constant term 6,297.68γ: import supply constant term

Solution 1.162Domestic price solution non-linear optimization constraint (excess -2.0E-07demand) 0.969World price solution Welfare and Output Comparisons VARIABLES BEFORE AFTER CHANGE PERCENT CHANGE Pw 1.000 0.969-0.031-3.14% P 1.000 1.162 0.162 16.23% M 6,297.68 4,578.51-1,719.17-27.30% Q 1,182.38 1,856.80 674.42 57.04% Demand 7,480.06 6,435.31-1,044.75-13.97% Tariffs 0 886.97 886.97 Terms of trade effect 170.64 Harberger triangle effect - 166.52 Welfare effect 4.11