Bunge Sugar & Bioenergy OTC Pricing Solutions. Bangkok, 20 th September 2010.

Similar documents
Fertilizer Overview DREW BURKE, CFO, BUNGE LIMITED BUNGE INVESTOR DAY

BMO CAPITAL MARKETS AGRICULTURE & PROTEIN CONFERENCE May 15, 2008

World Sugar Market Outlook

Bunge Reports Third Quarter 2017 Results

Bunge Reports Fourth Quarter 2017 Results

World Sugar in flux - Forecasting the Market Movements

Corporate Office. C- 11, Connaught Place, New Delhi , India. Phone: Fax:

CSP Program March Indofood Agri Resources Ltd

QSL RSSA MARKETING GUIDE

ANALYST BRIEFING MSM Malaysia Holdings Berhad Analyst Briefing Q /5/2017 1

Name of trading venue: ICE FUTURES EUROPE- Agricultural products division

Bunge to Acquire 70% Ownership Interest in IOI Loders Croklaan to Create a Leading Solutions Provider in B2B Oils

Risk Management & Profitability

Fundamental Factors Affecting Agricultural and Other Commodities. Research & Product Development Updated July 11, 2008

WILMAR INTERNATIONAL LIMITED (Incorporated in the Republic of Singapore) (Company Registration No Z) ACQUISITION OF SUCROGEN LIMITED

UK Grain Marketing Series January 19, Todd D. Davis Assistant Extension Professor. Economics

EU Sugar Producers and Financial Market Regulation

Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call. February 2, 2016

TRANSITIONING INTO A COMMON SWEETENER MARKET WITH MEXICO. Paul Farmer President, CSC Sugar LLC New Canaan, CT

Luis Henrique. Guimarães CEO

Market Outlook for Corn, Wheat, and Soybeans

In a sweet spot. Firm prices, deleveraging to improve the credit profiles of sugar companies. May 2017

GROWING WORLD 2010 ANNUAL REPORT

SOYBEAN COMPLEX SPRING OUTLOOK

Soybeans face make or break moment Futures need a two-fer to avoid losses By Bryce Knorr, senior grain market analyst

Marketing Strategies for Robert Anwender Grain Merchandiser

3Q17 and 9M17 Results NOVEMBER 2017

10/06/2013. USA: Planting Progress Corn. XXVI FEFAC Congress

For Immediate Release May 31 st, 2013

Crops Marketing and Management Update

Urea makes new push higher Supply problems crop up just as demand for fertilizer rises By Bryce Knorr, grain market analyst

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE February 4, 2008 ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND REPORTS SECOND QUARTER RESULTS

Crops Marketing and Management Update

First Quarter Earnings Conference Call. May 2, 2017

North American Free Trade Agreement & the Canadian Sugar Market

Crops Marketing and Management Update

Company Presentation 1Q 2014 Results. 30 April 2014

World market and trade flows. Economic Board of the Sugar Market Observatory Thursday 12 th April 2018

ASX Commodities: Grains

In US$ million 4Q2017 4Q2016 Change FY2017 FY2016 Change. Revenue 11, , % 43, , %

SLOVENIA AG CONFERENCE

Increased production volatility and impact across the entire Agribusiness Supply Chain

2012 Annual Report. Fundamentals

WILMAR INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING. 28 April 2016

Conference Call 2Q17

Olam International Limited. Investment in Greenfield Sugar Refinery in Nigeria 3 December 2010 Singapore

WILMAR INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING. 25 April 2018

Saturday, January 5, Notes from Al

Jefferies 2014 Global Industrials Conference. August 11, 2014

News & Development Bollinger Band Retracement Levels Rising Channel Overall, we maintain our bullish view in MCX Crude Oil for the next one month.

INTRODUCTION TO EURONEXT COMMODITY DERIVATIVES

BUSINESS AND MARKETING TOOLS FOR PROFITABLE FARMING. Summer Crossroads: Volatility and Opportunity. Bryce Knorr Farm Futures Magazine

PAC Partners Agribusiness & Food Conference. 19 April 2016 Sydney Alistair Bell Chief Financial Officer

U.S. Steel Market Outlook. Amy Ebben ArcelorMittal USA November 30, 2018

Soybeans face long road End to tariffs wouldn t help 2018 exports much By Bryce Knorr, senior grain market analyst

The global financial system crisis. Opportunities for Banco do Brasil

Weather targets fertilizer market too Heavy rains stall shipments, delay fall applications By Bryce Knorr, grain market analyst

Company Presentation 1Q 2013 Results 29 April Company Presentation 4Q and FY 2012 Results. 27 Feb 2013

Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call. July 31, 2018

MARKET BRIEF: RAISINS

Banco do Brasil 2010

Overcoming Greed and Fear in Commodity Markets. Larry Martin, Ph. D. Agrifood Management Excellence ,

EU Sugar after 2015: consequences of the new regulations

ACE 427 Spring Lecture 6. by Professor Scott H. Irwin

Commodity Risk Through the Eyes of an Ag Lender

Soybean Monthly Report

Power of Travel Promotion Evolution

HEDGING WITH FUTURES AND BASIS

WILMAR INTERNATIONAL LIMITED 2Q2016 Results Briefing. August 11, 2016

Commodities. Sandra Ebner,, CFA Senior Portfolio Manager Deka Investment GmbH. May, 2010

Sugar Price Risk: A Tale of Two Mills

The Indian Sugar Industry Presented to: Honorable Finance Minister, Government of India

Yara International ASA Third Quarter results 2013

Company Presentation 3Q and 9M 2012 Results. 31 Oct 2012

OTHER COMMODITIES July 2016

Fall 2017 Crop Outlook Webinar

Shree Renuka Sugars. CMP: INR41 TP: INR50 Buy

2nd Feb Monthly Report On. February 2017

Closing Grain & Soybean Comments

FIJI/FAO 2012 Asia Pacific Sugar Conference. ACP perspectives on the Implementation of EPA- EBA Sugar Arrangements

Commodities Forecast Update Weakness awaits rest of 2014

Commodities: A Strategic Asset Allocation?

GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE 17 March 1961 SUGAR

It s time to book 2018 fertilizer Focus on nitrogen first, using right tool for each market By Bryce Knorr, grain market analyst

DEVELOP THE RIGHT PLAN FOR YOU.

11 May Energy Coal

Competitive landscape for global wheat in SEA

3Q11 and 9M11 Results

Tools For a Carry Market Tregg Cronin

AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY FUNDAMENTALS AND OUTLOOK

WILMAR INTERNATIONAL LIMITED 1Q2016 Results Highlights. May 10, 2016

QUARTERLY STATEMENT. Contact. Financial Year 2018/19. 1 st Quarter 1 March to 31 May CropEnergies AG Maximilianstraße Mannheim

Company Presentation 4Q 2017 Results. 28 Feb 2018

QUARTERLY EARNINGS 1Q18 AUGUST 14, 2017

Company Presentation 3Q and 9M 2016 Results. 28 Oct 2016

Institutional Presentation Caixa para descrição.

INSTITUTIONAL PRESENTATION

News & Development Rising Channel Bollinger Band Overall, we maintain our bullish view in MCX Crude Oil for the next one month.

SA Food Inflation Why all the fuss?

Stochastic analysis of the OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook

Transcription:

Bunge Sugar & Bioenergy OTC Pricing Solutions Bangkok, 20 th September 2010.

Forward Looking Statements Today s presentation includes forward-looking statements that reflect Bunge s current views with respect to future events, financial performance and industry conditions. These forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Bunge has provided additional information in its reports on file with the SEC concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in this presentation, and encourages you to review these factors. 2

Agenda About Bunge Supply & Demand Updates OTC Pricing Solutions

We Are a Leading Global Agribusiness & Food Company KEY FACTS CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN Employees: 37,000 Facilities: 400+ Sugar & Bioenergy 30% Agribusiness 45% Countries of Operations: 30+ Food & Ingredients 15% Fertilizer 10% Fertilizer Agribusiness Sugar & Bioenergy Food & Ingredients Retail fertilizer in Brazil Fertilizer operations in Argentina and the U.S. 50% stake in JV with OCP in Morocco A leader in oilseed processing A leader in global grain and oilseed marketing 20 MMT sugarcane milling capacity producing sugar, ethanol and electricity #2 in global trade and distribution Leading producer of consumer bottled oil brands in South America, Europe and Asia Leading supplier to food service companies and food processors in North America Leading corn and wheat miller in the Americas 4

Bunge has operated in agribusiness for over 190 years In Brazil, purchases Moema: adding 5 new sugarcane mills JPG Bunge founds Bunge & Co. in Amsterdam Establishes operations in Argentina to trade grain Starts business in North America Makes first export of soybeans from Brazil Builds first soy processing plant in US Builds largest US soybean crushing and refining plant Purchases edible oils company Walter Rau in Germany Opens first soybean processing plant in China Moves headquarters to US and creates international marketing unit 2010 1859 1905 1938 1967 1997 1999 2002 2007 2009 1818 1884 1918 1945 70s & 80s 1998 2001 2005 2008 Enters Brazilian fertilizer market with purchase of Serrana Purchases Santa Juliana sugarcane mill in Brazil Relocates to Antwerp to trade commodities Expands into Brazil and enters the wheat milling business Diversifies along the food production chain In Brazil, purchases soy processor Ceval and begins acquisition of new fertilizer brands Goes public on NYSE and becomes Argentina s leading agribusiness company in Purchases Cereol and becomes the world s largest soy processor Begins building an export terminal in the U.S. Pacific Northwest and a crushing plant in Vietnam 5

Sugar and Bioenergy fits with our capabilities Build global footprint and leverage commercial, logistics and risk management expertise over larger volumes and more products Oilseeds & Grains Origination Logistics Risk Management Processing Fertilizer Food & Ingredients Sugar & Bioenergy Palm Marketing & Distribution Other Expertise Current Value Chains Future Value Chains 7

Sugar & Bioenergy: Mission To become a leading global, fully integrated and flexible player in Sugar & Bioenergy, leveraging existing Bunge expertise and assets 9

We are building the business through greenfield investments and acquisitions Acquired Moema: 5 mills with 13.7 mmt of capacity Expands Bunge total capacity to 20mmt Acquired Santa Juliana mill (1st asset) Started development of Pedro Alfonso mill Raised dedicated funding to expand Sugar & Bioenergy Acquired 60% stake in Monte Verde sugarcane mill Acquired Tate & Lyle sugar trading & merchandizing business Announced JV with Itochu in Santa Juliana and Pedro Afonso Started sugar trading & merchandising operation 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 10

Bunge has established a strong production base in Brazil with capability to double production at existing mills MT TO DF BA Expected Expected Evolution Evolution of of Bunge Sugarcane Sugarcane Milling Milling Capacity Capacity (million (million metric tons tons of cane) of cane) 45 40 35 30 25 Bunge Moema Combined Potential MS PR Paranaguá MG Santos RJ ES Vitória 20 15 10 5 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2017 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2020 Original Bunge Mills (existing or under construction) Moema Mills 9

Bunge Sugar & Bioenergy Asset Profile 2010 Number of Mills: 8 (all in Brazil) Milling Capacity: 20 million mt Potential Expanding Capacity of Existing Mills (2020): ~ 40 million mt Production Flexibility: Sugar 35-40% / Ethanol 65-60% Cogeneration Available for Sale (forecast): 205 GWh Harvesting Mechanization Level: 86% Cane Supply: ~ 55% from leased land ~ 45% from 3 rd Parties

Sugar & Bioenergy Footprint Trading & Distribution - Large and efficient origination books in Brazil and Thailand - Preferred supplier of quality raw sugars to refineries around the world - Increase refined/white sugar trading Future Possibilities - Acquire minority stakes in destination refineries and logistics/port facilities in key destination markets (MENA/INDIA/RUSSIA) - Niche market opportunities: EU Tolling, Blends Value Beyond Sugar - Risk Management Capabilities: pricing solutions using exchanged traded and OTC derivatives - Logistics Capabilities

Agenda About Bunge Supply & Demand Updates OTC Pricing Solutions

Expected Surpluses in 2010/11 and 2011/2012 Global Sugar S&D including Surplus/Deficit MMT (Raw Value) 190.0 185.0 180.0 175.0 170.0 165.0 160.0 155.0 150.0 145.0 170.8 161.7 150.3 163.3 163.7 155.1 171.2 166.7 174.6 170.8 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 (-5.0) (-10.0) MMT (Raw Value) Production Changes 09/10 to 10/11 CS Brazil 28.7 to 34.5 India 18.7 to 24.3 China 10.7 to 12 Russia 3.2 to 2.9 Thailand 6.9 to 6.6 Australia 4.2 to 4.3 140.0 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10-E 2010/11-F 2011/12-F (-15.0) Global Production Global Consumption Surplus/Deficit

Surpluses build up will be relatively small Annual Surplus (Production - Consumption) in MTRV 15 12.1 10 7.7 9.1 5 4.4 3.7 - -5-0.7 0.1-1.4-5.3-3.3-3.3-2.6-10 -8.5-15 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14-13.0 Weather playing a major role: dry weather in Brazil, Thailand and Russia. Floods in Pakistan.

Return to deficit in 2012/13 and 2013/14 Annual Production Consumption in MTRV 190 Production 180 170 Consumption 168 171 162 163 164 171 167 175 171 175 172 180 177 160 150 147 143 144 142 151 148 156 150 155 140 130 120 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 Limited production growth potential associated with logistics limitation in Brazil Stable demand growth, mainly in Asia region

Brazil Crop Update Brazil Production (in MMT) 45 40 38.8 39.0 39.0 36.7 35 30 29.9 30.9 31.6 33.0 25 22.5 24.9 26.7 25.8 20 19.2 16.2 15 10 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 Extremely dry weather favourable for harvesting. Production records. Stock build up. Will millers end crop sooner than expected? Or harvest immature cane due to high prices? Sep-Dec rain critical to determinate next year crop 16

India The Great Unknown Indian Production (in MMT) 30 28 26 24 28.4 26.4 24.3 24.3 24.5 22 20 18.5 18.5 20.1 19.3 18.7 19.9 18 16 14 13.6 12.7 14.7 12 10 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 Good weather patterns, however still very early to determinate a real number. India as the biggest swing factor, any change in production can easily increase or destroy forecasted surplus 17

Stock Evolution Key Origins * Monthly Stock Evolution '000' MT 9,000 20,000 19,000 8,000 18,000 17,000 7,000 16,000 15,000 6,000 14,000 13,000 5,000 12,000 11,000 10,000 4,000 9,000 8,000 3,000 7,000 6,000 2,000 5,000 4,000 1,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 0 A-04 J-04 O-04 J-05 A-05 J-05 O-05 J-06 A-06 J-06 O-06 J-07 A-07 J-07 O-07 J-08 A-08 J-08 O-08 J-09 A-09 J-09 O-09 J-10 A-10 J-10 O-10 J-11 A-11 J-11 O-11 J-12 A-12 J-12 O-12 J-13 Production (LHS) Exports + Consumption (LHS) Ending Stocks (RHS) Key origins combined stocks peak in Oct 10 but in Mar-Jul 11 window go below Mar- Jul 2010

In Summary: UNCERTAINTY Regional imbalance should grow through FH 2011 A faster draw down of stocks thereafter Mar-Jul 11 due to potential smaller supplies from Thailand and Australia should see 2011 stock levels declining to levels even lower than Mar-Jun 2010 period Brazil stock build up to record levels in OCT 10 opens up a further downside potential to prices Brazil 2011/12 crop will depend on rain in the next 3 months Further world prices increase can push back demand India potentially the biggest spoiler if they decide to export into word price rally. Changes in regulation, political issues. Weather will continue to play a major role

Agenda About Bunge Supply & Demand Updates OTC Pricing Solutions

Overview What is OTC? Price fixation for a physical contract can be achieved through different instruments: Futures, Exchange Options or OTC OTC structures are designed to give the miller an advantage versus futures hedging OTC structures use options that are tailored, and hence more flexible than exchange options The OTC structures traded will convert into exchange futures on expiry, to price the physical contract

Overview What is OTC? The OTC structure is a package of options that is traded directly between two parties (Bunge and the mill). It is not passed through the futures exchange Therefore the terms of the deal must be set out clearly between both parties, as usual NY futures terms do not necessarily apply The OTC structures traded will convert into exchange futures on expiry, to price the physical contract

Why do OTC? Chance of upside participation in a rising market Diversified hedging approach Structures tailored to customer s needs Can be at zero cost No min/max size within physical contract parameters Regular valuation and position reporting

OTCs versus Futures OTC Futures Fixation Chance of participation in a rising market No participation in a rising market Terms and Specifications Flexibility: tenors, expiry date, etc. Standard and fixed terms and specifications Tonnage Can vary depending on double up / knock out Fixed number of lots Cost Can be zero cost Zero Cost

OTC Pricing OTC structure are generally combinations of various option types, thus their prices depend on multiple factors, the most influential being: - Underlying Asset - Time to Expiry - Volatility Level Market levels for underlying asset and volatility are changing constantly hence OTC prices can change in a fast moving market Many OTC Structures can be benchmarked to a spread to the underlying asset during a live market for indicative price levels

Critical Factors for OTC pricing Underlying Asset Determines the starting point of OTCs on which any double up, guaranteed price or knock out levels are based. Easily observed on the futures market Volatility Determines the pricing levels applicable to each structure. Observable in the market by extracting the implied volatility from option price settlements. Time value Also determines the price levels applicable to each structure. Easily observable.

What is OTC? Risk vs Reward By using different types of options the OTC structure is usually created at zero cost to the miller. Leverage features enables the mill to receive a better price than the current futures market

OTC Leverage Risks Double Up Reset Double ups (DU) define the level where the miller commits to deliver twice the initial volume. DUs can be Daily or Bullet. Daily Total volume is divided by number of days and double up is calculated on daily settle for that volume Bullet Double up is calculated for entire volume on final expiration day Resets define the level where the millers pricing is reset from a higher level (typically above current market) to a lower level (typical current market). Resets can also be Daily or Bullet. Knock Out: Knock outs (KO) define the level where the miller loses price protection and reverts to market price. Just as DUs and Resets, KO outs can be Daily or Bullet, but they can also be One Touch (Daily or Bullet) One Touch Knock out is calculated daily basis EACH TRADE for the entire remaining volume (if daily remaining volume may be less than initial volume)

OTC Types Popular OTC structures consist of a floor price with some chance of upside improvement The popular types of structures are: Collars A fixed floor and ceiling with the ability to sell at the market price in between floor and ceiling KO accumulators A fixed sell price above the current market that resets lower or cancels if market drops too much

OTC Example 1 Producer Collar Accumulators Designed to accumulate short futures daily within a set range Lower end of the range set at or below the current market Higher end of the range set above the current market No KO total quantity will be always accumulated Double Up - To bring structure to zero cost, miller agrees to sell more futures if market closes at or above certain level - Daily or Expiry

Producer Collar Accumulator with Expiry Double Up Futures Month Current Market Lower Level Upper Level Double Up Level Days to Expiry Expiry date Mar 11 22.00 22.00 23.50 23.50 107 15 th Feb 2011 Assume a deal for 107 lots (1 lot per day). Every day the miller will sell: - If market settles => 23.50 : Sell 1 lot at 23.50 - If market settles <= 22.00 : Sell 1 lot at 22.00 - If market settles > 22.00 and < 23.50: Sell 1 lot at settlement price On expiry, if market settles => 23.50: Sell an extra 107 lots at 23.50 18.00 17.00 23.50 16.00 22.00 15.00 14.00 Sell 1 lot @ 23.50 Sell 1 lot @ 22.00 Sell 1 lot @ 23.50 Sell 1 lot @ Settl. Sell 1 lot @ 22.00 Sell 1 lot @ Settl. Sell Extra 107 lots @ 23.50 Day 1 Day 2 Expiry Advantages: - Downside protection and upside participation in case market rises - Averaging effect -No KO - Zero Cost Disadvantage: - Double Up could result in being over hedged - Upside participation capped at 23.50

Producer Collar Accumulator with Daily Double Up Futures Month Current Market Lower Level Upper Level Double Up Level Days to Expiry Expiry date Mar 11 22.00 22.00 23.05 23.05 107 15 th Feb 2011 Assume a deal for 107 lots (1 lot per day). Every day the miller will sell: - If market settles => 23.05 : Sell 2 lots at 23.05 - If market settles <= 22.00 : Sell 1 lot at 22.00 - If market settles > 22.00 and < 23.05: Sell 1 lot at settlement price 18.00 23.05 17.00 16.00 22.00 15.00 14.00 Sell 2 lot s @ 23.05 Sell 1 lot @ 22.00 Sell 2 lots @ 23.05 Sell 1 lot @ Settl. Sell 1 lot @ 22.00 Sell 1 lot @ Settl. Day 1 Day 2 Expiry Advantages: - Downside protection and upside participation in case market rises - Averaging effect -No KO - Zero Cost - Lower Risk than Expiry Double Up Disadvantage: - Smaller upside participation when compared to expiry double up OTC -Double Up could result in being over hedged

OTC Example 2 Producer Knock Out Accumulators Designed to accumulate short futures at a fixed price above current market Structure has a Knock Out Level No accumulation if market ever trades at specific level KO can be single (accumulation stops completely) or daily (no accumulation on that specific day) Double Up - Daily or Expiry

Producer Accumulator with Single KO and Expiry Double Up Futures Month Current Market Sell Level Knock Out Level Double Up Level Days to Expiry Expiry date Mar 11 22.00 23.35 17.50 23.35 107 15 th Feb 2011 Assume a deal for 107 lots (1 lot per day). Every day the miller will sell: - Wherever the market settles: Sell 1 lot at 23.35, UNLESS - If market ever trades <= 17.50 : OTC Knocks Out. No further accumulation after this point. Accumulation so far is kept. - On expiry, if market settles => 23.35: Sell an extra 107 lots at 23.35 - No Double Up in case of KO Advantages: Sell 1 lot @ 23.35 - Pricing well above current market, instant benefit versus futures - Zero Cost Disadvantage: Sell 1 lot @ 23.35 - Could result in being under hedged (KO) KO - No further accumulation or over hedged (Double UP) 22.00 21.00 20.00 23.35 19.00 18.00 17.00 16.00 17.50 15.00 14.00 13.00 Day 1 Day 2 Expiry

Producer Accumulator with Daily KO and Expiry Double Up Futures Month Current Market Sell Level Knock Out Level Double Up Level Days to Expiry Expiry date Mar 11 22.00 23.00 17.00 23.00 107 15 th Feb 2011 Assume a deal for 107 lots (1 lot per day). Every day the miller will sell: - Wherever the market settles: Sell 1 lot at 23.00, UNLESS - Market trades <= 17.00 : No futures accumulation on that specific day. -On expiry, if market settles >= 23.00: Sell an extra 107 lots at 23.00 22.00 21.00 20.00 23.00 19.00 18.00 17.00 16.00 17.00 15.00 14.00 13.00 Sell 2 lots @ 23.00 Sell 1 lot @ 23.00 Sell 1 lot @ 23.00 KO - No accumulation on the day Day 1 Day 2 Expiry Advantages: -Pricing well above current market, instant benefit versus futures - Lower Risk than Single KO OTC - Zero Cost Disadvantage: - Could result in being under hedged (KO) or over hedged (Double UP)

OTC Product Portfolio Bunge offers a wide range of structures built to fit different risk management needs and sophistication levels We cover all legs within the sugar supply chain including: - NY#11 - LDN#5 - White Premium Selected structures can be priced with the underlying based in Thai Baht Specialized OTC structures can be designed to fit a customers needs

OTC Execution All structures shown are benchmarked versus a specific futures contract price The pricing levels indicated are valid for a limited time and will need to be refreshed if a significant amount of time passes and/or there is a major price move OTC orders can be executed in two different ways Limit Order or Market Order : Limit Order specifies each level of the structure to be filled Market Order specifies only the futures level against which the other pricing levels are to be benchmarked

OTC Position Management OTCs provide pricing within physical contract parameters Regular position reporting provided to monitor accumulation so far Lots can become available as time passes Close out valuations available at any time

Conclusion OTC structures can enhance the miller fixation by: - Diversification of pricing portfolio - Offering chance of upside participation - Averaging effect (collars) - Suits well the Thai system: Quota B = Quota C Although there are also risks involved: - Double Up: Risk of overpricing - Knock Out: Risk of underpricing Therefore OTC pricing should be used in conjunction with futures and/or options as part of a portfolio approach to hedging

Thank you very much ขอบค ณมาก