Forecasting Volatility of Hang Seng Index and its Application on Reserving for Investment Guarantees. Herbert Tak-wah Chan Derrick Wing-hong Fung

Similar documents
Some Simple Stochastic Models for Analyzing Investment Guarantees p. 1/36

Financial Times Series. Lecture 6

12. Conditional heteroscedastic models (ARCH) MA6622, Ernesto Mordecki, CityU, HK, 2006.

Assicurazioni Generali: An Option Pricing Case with NAGARCH

Market Risk and Model Risk of Financial Institutions Writing Derivative Warrants: Evidence from Taiwan and Hong Kong

Analytical Finance 1 Seminar Monte-Carlo application for Value-at-Risk on a portfolio of Options, Futures and Equities

Week 2 Quantitative Analysis of Financial Markets Hypothesis Testing and Confidence Intervals

**BEGINNING OF EXAMINATION** A random sample of five observations from a population is:

Cross-Sectional Distribution of GARCH Coefficients across S&P 500 Constituents : Time-Variation over the Period

Tests for Two Variances

Binomial Random Variables. Binomial Random Variables

Risk Management and Time Series

continuous rv Note for a legitimate pdf, we have f (x) 0 and f (x)dx = 1. For a continuous rv, P(X = c) = c f (x)dx = 0, hence

Statistical Tables Compiled by Alan J. Terry

Tests for One Variance

Evaluating the Accuracy of Value at Risk Approaches

John Hull, Risk Management and Financial Institutions, 4th Edition

Version A. Problem 1. Let X be the continuous random variable defined by the following pdf: 1 x/2 when 0 x 2, f(x) = 0 otherwise.

Research Article The Volatility of the Index of Shanghai Stock Market Research Based on ARCH and Its Extended Forms

Lecture 5a: ARCH Models

Modelling stock index volatility

Chapter 9: Sampling Distributions

. 13. The maximum error (margin of error) of the estimate for μ (based on known σ) is:

1. You are given the following information about a stationary AR(2) model:

Lecture Stat 302 Introduction to Probability - Slides 15

The Great Moderation Flattens Fat Tails: Disappearing Leptokurtosis

Value at Risk with Stable Distributions

Sampling & populations

SYSM 6304 Risk and Decision Analysis Lecture 2: Fitting Distributions to Data

Volatility in the Indian Financial Market Before, During and After the Global Financial Crisis

FORECASTING PERFORMANCE OF MARKOV-SWITCHING GARCH MODELS: A LARGE-SCALE EMPIRICAL STUDY

Impact of Derivatives Expiration on Underlying Securities: Empirical Evidence from India

No, because np = 100(0.02) = 2. The value of np must be greater than or equal to 5 to use the normal approximation.

A gentle introduction to the RM 2006 methodology

Properties of financail time series GARCH(p,q) models Risk premium and ARCH-M models Leverage effects and asymmetric GARCH models.

FORECASTING OF VALUE AT RISK BY USING PERCENTILE OF CLUSTER METHOD

Modelling Joint Distribution of Returns. Dr. Sawsan Hilal space

Forecasting Stock Index Futures Price Volatility: Linear vs. Nonlinear Models

Downside Risk: Implications for Financial Management Robert Engle NYU Stern School of Business Carlos III, May 24,2004

FINANCIAL ECONOMETRICS AND EMPIRICAL FINANCE MODULE 2

Intraday Volatility Forecast in Australian Equity Market

Modelling of Long-Term Risk

Indian Institute of Management Calcutta. Working Paper Series. WPS No. 797 March Implied Volatility and Predictability of GARCH Models

Financial Econometrics: A Comparison of GARCH type Model Performances when Forecasting VaR. Bachelor of Science Thesis. Fall 2014

IEOR E4602: Quantitative Risk Management

Statistics Class 15 3/21/2012

Amath 546/Econ 589 Univariate GARCH Models: Advanced Topics

Chapter 8 Statistical Intervals for a Single Sample

Chapter 6 Confidence Intervals

Modelling the stochastic behaviour of short-term interest rates: A survey

Volatility Clustering of Fine Wine Prices assuming Different Distributions

Forecasting Value at Risk in the Swedish stock market an investigation of GARCH volatility models

Modelling volatility - ARCH and GARCH models

Financial Econometrics

ECE 295: Lecture 03 Estimation and Confidence Interval

ECO220Y Continuous Probability Distributions: Normal Readings: Chapter 9, section 9.10

Fuzzy Volatility Forecasts and Fuzzy Option Values

Value at Risk Ch.12. PAK Study Manual

A Quantile Regression Approach to the Multiple Period Value at Risk Estimation

The Binomial Probability Distribution

FINA 695 Assignment 1 Simon Foucher

Unit 5: Sampling Distributions of Statistics

Unit 5: Sampling Distributions of Statistics

MATH 264 Problem Homework I

Basis Risk and Optimal longevity hedging framework for Insurance Company

ME3620. Theory of Engineering Experimentation. Spring Chapter III. Random Variables and Probability Distributions.

Two hours. To be supplied by the Examinations Office: Mathematical Formula Tables and Statistical Tables THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER

Tests for Intraclass Correlation

INTERTEMPORAL ASSET ALLOCATION: THEORY

Parametric and Semi-parametric models of Value-at-Risk: On the way to bias reduction

Conditional Heteroscedasticity

Financial Econometrics

Handbook of Financial Risk Management

Chapter 1. Introduction

A Study of Stock Return Distributions of Leading Indian Bank s

LONG MEMORY IN VOLATILITY

Non-Inferiority Tests for the Ratio of Two Means

LESSON 7 INTERVAL ESTIMATION SAMIE L.S. LY

INSTITUTE AND FACULTY OF ACTUARIES. Curriculum 2019 SPECIMEN EXAMINATION

Time-Simultaneous Fan Charts: Applications to Stochastic Life Table Forecasting

STAT Chapter 7: Confidence Intervals

Implied Volatility v/s Realized Volatility: A Forecasting Dimension

Financial Econometrics Jeffrey R. Russell. Midterm 2014 Suggested Solutions. TA: B. B. Deng

Interval estimation. September 29, Outline Basic ideas Sampling variation and CLT Interval estimation using X More general problems

TRΛNSPΛRΣNCY ΛNΛLYTICS

Alexander Marianski August IFRS 9: Probably Weighted and Biased?

The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2009, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Final Exam

Two Hours. Mathematical formula books and statistical tables are to be provided THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER. 22 January :00 16:00

ANALYZING VALUE AT RISK AND EXPECTED SHORTFALL METHODS: THE USE OF PARAMETRIC, NON-PARAMETRIC, AND SEMI-PARAMETRIC MODELS

A Fuzzy Pay-Off Method for Real Option Valuation

Retirement, Saving, Benefit Claiming and Solvency Under A Partial System of Voluntary Personal Accounts

Homework Problems Stat 479

Course information FN3142 Quantitative finance

Internet Appendix for Asymmetry in Stock Comovements: An Entropy Approach

Tutorial 6. Sampling Distribution. ENGG2450A Tutors. 27 February The Chinese University of Hong Kong 1/6

Financial Times Series. Lecture 8

CHAPTER 8. Confidence Interval Estimation Point and Interval Estimates

Section 7.2. Estimating a Population Proportion

Oil Price Effects on Exchange Rate and Price Level: The Case of South Korea

FINITE SAMPLE DISTRIBUTIONS OF RISK-RETURN RATIOS

Transcription:

Forecasting Volatility of Hang Seng Index and its Application on Reserving for Investment Guarantees Herbert Tak-wah Chan Derrick Wing-hong Fung

This presentation represents the view of the presenters and does not represent our employer.

Objective This presentation aims to explain the 2006 ASHK Annual Best Paper Forecasting Volatility of Hang Seng Index and its Application on Reserving for Investment Guarantees jointly written by Herbert Chan and Derrick Fung, which can be downloaded at http://www.actuaries.org.hk/doc/paper06_herbertchan&derrickfung.pdf

The paper The paper can be generally divided into 2 parts (1) Forecast Hang Seng Index (HSI) daily volatility based on historical HSI data and validation of these forecasted daily volatilities (2) Discuss the application of forecasted volatility on reserving for investment guarantees

Flow Chart HSI Data Fit data into GARCH GARCH Fitting Obtain satisfactory results for data fitting Forecasting Obtain forecasted HSI daily volatilities Validation Accuracy of the forecasted HSI daily volatilities are validated by VAR and Binomial Test Application Application on reserving for investment guarantees

HSI Data Daily return of HSI price Historical volatility Realized volatility Implied volatility

Daily Return We define daily return R n at day n as logarithmic return: R n = 100 (lnp n -lnp n-1 ) where P n is the closing price of HSI at day n Why not R n = 100 (P n /P n-1-1)?

Daily Return lnp n -lnp n-1 = ln(p n /P n-1 ) = ln(1+r n ) = R n R n2 /2 + R n3 /3 R n4 /4 + (Taylor series) ~ R n for small values of R n

Daily Return Logarithmic return is commonly used in financial literature because of its additive nature Cumulative Return at day n = 100 (lnp n lnp 0 ) = R n + R n-1 + + R 1

Historical Volatility Historical volatility at day n is defined as the variance of daily returns in the preceding 30 transaction days

Historical Volatility Historical volatility at day n: 1 29 n m = n 29 ( R m R where R is the mean of return in the preceding 30 transaction days A total of 1235 historical volatilities are calculated 15 February 1999 to 20 April 2004 2 )

Realized Volatility Realized Volatility is the variance of 5-minute returns within a day Record 5-minute returns of HSI R n,d = 100 (lnp n,d lnp n,d-1 ) where P n,d is the asset price at trading day n, at the 5-minute mark d.

Realized Volatility Realized volatility at day n is defined as: where day n ~ σ R n 2 n 54 1 = 52 d = 2 ( ) 2 R R 55 n, d n is the mean of 5-minute return at

Realized Volatility A total of 1235 realized volatilities are calculated 15 February 1999 to 20 April 2004

Implied Volatility Using Black-Scholes model, implied volatility is calculated from options whose underlying asset is HSI It is calculated on a daily basis and is obtained from Hong Kong Exchange and Clearing Limited 1235 implied volatilities are obtained 15 February 1999 to 20 April 2004

HSI Data 1235 historical volatilities, realized volatilities and implied volatilities are obtained from 15 February 1999 to 20 April 2004

Flow Chart HSI Data Fit data into GARCH GARCH Fitting Obtain satisfactory results for data fitting Forecasting Obtain forecasted HSI daily volatilities Validation Accuracy of the forecasted HSI daily volatilities are validated by VAR and Binomial Test Application Application on reserving for investment guarantees

GARCH model Financial studies show that stable periods and volatile periods tend to be protracted, resulting in clusters GARCH model can capture these volatility clusters

GARCH model Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) model was developed by Bollerslev (1986) R σ n 2 n = μ σ ++ = ω n α ε R n 2 n 1 + βσ 2 n 1 ε n ~ NID(0,1)

GARCH model GARCH model with historical volatility, realized volatility or implied volatility ~ NID(0,1) ε n 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 + + + = + = n n n n n n n s R R γ βσ α ω σ ε σ μ

Flow Chart HSI Data Fit data into GARCH GARCH Fitting Obtain satisfactory results for data fitting Forecasting Obtain forecasted HSI daily volatilities Validation Accuracy of the forecasted HSI daily volatilities are validated by VAR and Binomial Test Application Application on reserving for investment guarantees

Estimation Simple GARCH Observations:1235 Standard Approx Parameter DF Estimate Error t Value Pr > t μ ω α β 1 0.0425 0.0440 0.97 0.3335 1 0.0353 0.0146 2.43 0.0153 1 0.0422 0.009499 4.44 <.0001 1 0.9460 0.0124 76.35 <.0001

Fitting When HSI data are fitted into the GARCH model, empirical results show satisfactory model fitting performance.

Flow Chart HSI Data Fit data into GARCH GARCH Fitting Obtain satisfactory results for data fitting Forecasting Obtain forecasted HSI daily volatilities Validation Accuracy of the forecasted HSI daily volatilities are validated by VAR and Binomial Test Application Application on reserving for investment guarantees

Forecasting HSI Volatilities After fitting HSI data from 1999 to 2004, one day ahead volatilities are forecasted by the GARCH model.

Forecasting-GARCH Use the method rolling window for forecasting 1 day ahead forecasting 1235 data

Forecasting-GARCH Use the method rolling window for forecasting 1 day ahead forecasting 1 to 735 736

Forecasting-GARCH Use the method rolling window for forecasting 1 day ahead forecasting 2 to 736 737

Forecasting-GARCH Use the method rolling window for forecasting 1 day ahead forecasting 500 to 1234 1235

Forecasting-GARCH Use the method rolling window for forecasting 1 day ahead forecasting 736 to 1235

Flow Chart HSI Data Fit data into GARCH GARCH Fitting Obtain satisfactory results for data fitting Forecasting Obtain forecasted HSI daily volatilities Validation Accuracy of the forecasted HSI daily volatilities are validated by VAR and Binomial Test Application Application on reserving for investment guarantees

Forecasted Volatility Validation Compare actual volatility with forecasted volatility from day 736 to day 1235? However, actual volatility is not observable!

Value at Risk approach Since volatilities are not observable, we use the value at risk approach to validate the accuracy of forecasted volatilities In the GARCH model, return is assumed to be normally distributed with mean and variance 2 σ n μ n

Value at Risk approach μ 1. 645 n σ n μn

Value at Risk approach Now we have 500 forecasted daily volatilities. If we assume forecasted daily volatility and estimated mean at day n are accurate there should be around 25, i.e. 5% of 500, of them falling into the colored area In other words, if we observe around 25 falling into the colored area, we can conclude that those 500 forecasted daily volatilities and estimated means are accurate.

Value at Risk approach The new problem is: are we safe to conclude that forecasted daily volatilities and estimated means are accurate if we observe 24 falling into the colored area? What if 23, 26 or 27 falling into the colored area? What is our tolerance limit?

Binomial Test H 0 :forecasted daily volatility and estimated mean are accurate H 1 :forecasted daily volatility and estimated mean are not accurate Rejection Rule: With n=500, p=0.05, np(1-p)=23.75, α =5%, we reject H 0 if test statistic< np 1.96 np(1 p) =15.4 Or test statistic> np + 1.96 np (1 p) =34.6 Conclusion: If the number of returns falling into the colored area is between 16 and 34, we fail to reject H 0 at 5% significance level

Binomial Test Results GARCH Simple With historical volatility With realized volatility With implied volatility No. of returns falling into the colored area 16 17 18 18 p-value 0.0648 0.1007 0.1509 0.1509

Validation Result Based on value at risk approach and results of binomial test, it is found that the forecasted volatilities from the GARCH model are accurate.

Flow Chart HSI Data Fit data into GARCH GARCH Fitting Obtain satisfactory results for data fitting Forecasting Obtain forecasted HSI daily volatilities Validation Accuracy of the forecasted HSI daily volatilities are validated by VAR and Binomial Test Application Application on reserving for investment guarantees

Application of Forecasted Volatilities Reserving for investment guarantees Asset management Option pricing Calculation of VaR for asset portfolios

Reserving for investment guarantees For illustrative purposes, the remaining slides demonstrate a very simple simulation method of reserving for investment guarantees Conditional tail expectation (CTE), lapse rates, management expenses, mortality, withdrawal, future contributions, interest rate, etc., are not discussed in the simple simulation method

Reserving for investment guarantees Actuaries shall pay due regard to GN7 and AGN8 issued by the OCI and ASHK respectively for reserving principles, modeling process, calibration standard and modeling constraints

HSI price at worst case scenario Now we know the daily return follows properties in GARCH model and forecasted volatilities are accurate, we can simulate the most adverse HSI price by using random generator.

We now forecast most adverse HSI price 100 days later (1) 100 random numbers between (0,1) are generated by a random generator and considered to be F(x) of returns from day 1 to 100 (2) Mean of return μ n for day 1 to 100 is assumed to be the same and estimated by the GARCH model by fitting historical data into the model (3) Daily volatility for day 1 is forecasted by the GARCH model by fitting historical data into the model

We now forecast most adverse HSI price 100 days later (4) As we have the cumulative distribution function, estimated mean and forecasted daily volatility for day 1, we can determine daily return for day 1, hence the HSI price at day 1 (5) Daily volatility for day 2 is forecasted by the GARCH model by fitting historical data and simulated data for day 1 into the model (6) HSI price at day 2 is simulated (7) Similarly, HSI price at day 100 is simulated

We now forecast most adverse HSI price 100 days later (8) Repeat step 1 to 7 for 2000 times, we get 2000 simulated HSI price at day 100 (9) The most adverse HSI price at day 100 with 99% level of confidence is the 21 st simulated price in ascending order among those 2000 simulated prices

Reserving for Investment Guarantees A simple provision (ignoring mortality, lapse, expense, interest rate, etc.) for investment guarantees wholly invested in HSI is: Reserve = Guaranteed benefit most adverse HSI price at 99% confidence interval

Flow Chart HSI Data Fit data into GARCH GARCH Fitting Obtain satisfactory results for data fitting Forecasting Obtain forecasted HSI daily volatilities Validation Accuracy of the forecasted HSI daily volatilities are validated by VAR and Binomial Test Application Application on reserving for investment guarantees

Q&A Section