CoreLogic National Foreclosure Report

Similar documents
CoreLogic National Foreclosure Report

National Foreclosure Report

CoreLogic National Foreclosure Report. August With Quarterly Shadow Inventory Supplement

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE February 8, 2012

Equity Report FOURTH QUARTER 2014

CoreLogic Equity Report

Equity Report THIRD QUARTER 2014

Insufficient and Negative Equity

Age of Insured Discount

ACORD Forms Updated in AMS R1

36 Million Without Health Insurance in 2014; Decreases in Uninsurance Between 2013 and 2014 Varied by State

STATE TAX WITHHOLDING GUIDELINES

medicaid a n d t h e How will the Medicaid Expansion for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief

NCSL Midwest States Fiscal Leaders Forum. March 10, 2017

Installment Loans CHARTS. No cap other than unconscionability:

ACORD Forms in ebixasp (03/2004)

Household Income for States: 2010 and 2011

American Memorial Contract

Health Insurance Price Index for October-December February 2014

Data Note: What if Per Enrollee Medicaid Spending Growth Had Been Limited to CPI-M from ?

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE August 26, 2010

Highlights. Percent of States with a Decrease in MH Expenditures from Prior Year: FY2001 to 2010

BY THE NUMBERS 2016: Another Lackluster Year for State Tax Revenue

Update: 50-State Survey of Retiree Health Care Liabilities Most recent data show changes to benefits, funding policies could help manage rising costs

State, Local and Net Tuition Revenue Supporting General Operating Expenses of Higher Education, U.S., Fiscal Year 2010, Current (unadjusted) Dollars

Final Paycheck Laws by State

Non-Financial Change Form

Committee on Ways and Means Democrats

MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE GUIDE

NASRA Issue Brief: Employee Contributions to Public Pension Plans

FISCAL YEAR 2016 AT A GLANCE Number of Authorized Firms

MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE GUIDE

LIFE AND ACCIDENT AND HEALTH

Required Minimum Distribution Election Form for IRA s, 403(b)/TSA and other Qualified Plans

TThe Supplemental Nutrition Assistance

May Complaint snapshot: Debt collection

IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION

Housing Market Update. September 23, 2013

Monthly Complaint Report

STATE MOTOR FUEL TAX INCREASES:

Financing Unemployment Benefits in Today s Tough Economic Times

kaiser medicaid and the uninsured commission on The Cost and Coverage Implications of the ACA Medicaid Expansion: National and State-by-State Analysis

Long-Term Care Partnership Overview & Training Requirements Guide

Quality & Nondestructive Testing Industry. Salary Survey Your Path to the Perfect Job Starts Here.

Systematic Distribution Form

Long-Term Care Partnership Overview & Training Requirements Guide

State Retiree Health Care Liabilities: An Update Increased obligations in 2015 mirrored rise in overall health care costs

Frequency and Severity Results by State

2017 WORKBOOK. Mandatory LTC Training

State Postal Abbreviation Codes

SURVEY OF STATE FUNDING FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Transmission of material in this release is embargoed until 8:30 a.m. (EDT) Wednesday, October 31, 2012

STATE MOTOR FUEL TAX INCREASES:

Comparative Revenues and Revenue Forecasts Prepared By: Bureau of Legislative Research Fiscal Services Division State of Arkansas

The Economics of Homelessness

Financial Transaction Form for IRA and Non-Qualified Contracts Only

New Agent Welcome Kit

The Puzzling Decline in State Sales Tax Collections

DC Contributions to the DC College Savings Plan of up to $4,000 per year by an individual, and up to $8,000 per year by married taxpayers who each mak

JH Insurance Licensing Guide

Health Coverage for the Black Population Today and Under the Affordable Care Act

How is the Affordable Care Act Leading to Changes in Medicaid Today? State Adoption of Five New Options

NASRA Issue Brief: Public Pension Plan Investment Return Assumptions

Health and Health Coverage in the South: A Data Update

Percent Corporate Dividend Received Deduction. Per Share Long-Term Capital Gain Distribution

University of Wisconsin System SFS Business Process AP /1042s/Tax Bolt-On

National Employment Law Project UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE FINANCING: STATE TRUST FUNDS IN RECESSION AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008

American Jobs Act - Preventing Teacher Layoffs Estimated Jobs Impact by State

Marilyn Tavenner, CMS Administrator Don Moulds, Acting Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation

Financial Firsts: When Do People Take Their First Financial Steps? Appendix: Annotated Questionnaire 1

Aetna Individual Direct Pay Commissions Schedule

Annual Compliance Questionnaire. Sample

Confronting the UI Solvency Crisis

Union Members in New York and New Jersey 2018

National Vital Statistics Reports

Impacts of Prepayment Penalties and Balloon Loans on Foreclosure Starts, in Selected States: Supplemental Tables

Fundamentals and Best Practices for Handling Multistate Taxation Presented Thursday, April 16, 2015

Medicaid & CHIP: February 2014 Monthly Applications, Eligibility Determinations, and Enrollment Report April 4, 2014

Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Forms

Income from U.S. Government Obligations

Monthly Complaint Report

Checkpoint Payroll Sources All Payroll Sources

ES Figure 1 Federal Medicaid Spending Under Current Law and the House Budget Plan, % Reduction in Spending $4,591

DATA AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

Underwriting Results by State. Based on Data Valued as of December 31, 2016

Q309 NATIONAL DELINQUENCY SURVEY FROM THE MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION. Data as of September 30, 2009

Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Forms

Legal Counsel and Representation of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program

FOCUS. Health Reform. Health Insurance Market Reforms: Rate Review DECEMBER Overview. What is rate review?

Plan documents are the final arbiter of coverage. Dental Accident Critical Illness Pets Best

Q209 NATIONAL DELINQUENCY SURVEY FROM THE MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION. Data as of June 30, 2009

Kentucky , ,349 55,446 95,337 91,006 2,427 1, ,349, ,306,236 5,176,360 2,867,000 1,462

Table PDENT-CH (continued) This measure identifies the percentage of children ages 1 to 20 who are covered by Medicaid or CHIP Medicaid Expansion

State Estate Taxes BECAUSE YOU ASKED ADVANCED MARKETS

Mutual Fund Tax Information

Mutual Fund Tax Information

Aetna Medicare 2013 Benefits at a Glance

Media Alert. First American CoreLogic Releases Q3 Negative Equity Data

Percent Corporate Dividend Received Deduction. Per Share Long-Term Capital Gain Distribution

Required Training Completion Date. Asset Protection Reciprocity

Transcription:

CoreLogic National Report

s National Overview through The Inventory Is Down 3 Percent Month Over Month and the Rate Is Back to January 2009 Levels The Seriously Delinquent Rate Is Just Under 5 Percent for the First Time Since November 2008 At the End Of, There Were 1.9 Million Mortgages, Or 5.0 Percent, In Serious Delinquency Completed s 48,000 19% 11.8% in Compared to January 2013 Compared to December 2013 A CoreLogic analysis shows 48,000 foreclosures were completed in, a 19 percent year-over-year decline from 59,000 in January 2013. By comparison, before the decline in the housing market in 2007, completed foreclosures averaged 21,000 per month nationwide between 2000 and 2006. On a month-over-month* basis, completed foreclosures declined 11.8 percent. Completed foreclosures are an indication of the total number of homes actually lost to foreclosure. Since the financial crisis began in September 2008, approximately 4.9 Million s have been completed We are recovering, but we re not there yet. For every completed foreclosure, there are 954 mortgaged homes in non-judicial foreclosure states and 896 mortgaged homes in judicial foreclosure states. Although this is a big improvement relative to the height of the foreclosure crisis, a healthier ratio would be one for every 2000. Dr. Mark Fleming, chief economist for CoreLogic *December data was revised. Revisions with public records are standard and to ensure accuracy, CoreLogic incorporates newly released data to provide updated results. reproduced in any form without express written permission. 2

National Inventory 33% Compared to January 2013 3.3% Compared to december 2013 Approximately 794,000 homes in the United States were in some stage of foreclosure as of, compared to nearly 1.2 million in January 2013, a decrease of 33 percent. This was the 27 th consecutive month with a year-over-year decline. As of, the foreclosure inventory represented 2.0 percent of all homes with a mortgage compared to 2.9 percent in January 2013. The foreclosure inventory declined 3.3 percent from December 2013 to. THERE HAVE BEEN 13 CONSECUTIVE MONTHS OF AT LEAST 20 PERCENT YEAR-OVER- YEAR DECLINE IN THE INVENTORY OF FORECLOSED HOMES The painful tide of high foreclosures continues to recede as fewer borrowers are losing their homes and states are working through their shadow inventory. We are entering 2014 with less than a million homes in the foreclosure inventory. We expect to see continued progress in the months ahead, but the judicial foreclosure states will continue to lag the rest of the country in working down their backlogs of foreclosed properties. Anand Nallathambi, president and CEO of CoreLogic reproduced in any form without express written permission. 3

Time Series National Overview THE NUMBER OF MORTGAGES IN SERIOUS DELINQUENCY DECLINED 25.3 PERCENT FROM JANUARY 2013 TO JANUARY 2014 Feb-13 Mar-13 Apr-13 may-13 jun-13 jul-13 aug-13 sep-13 oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 SDQ* 2,510 2,424 2,328 2,256 2,223 2,181 2,102 2,068 2,027 2,012 1,975 1,946 -MOM % Chg in # -3.6% -3.4% -4.0% -3.1% -1.5% -1.9% -3.6% -1.6% -2.0% -0.7% -1.8% -1.5% -YOY % Chg in # -16.7% -17.6% -20.1% -21.6% -22.4% -23.7% -25.3% -25.7% -25.0% -24.7% -25.1% -25.3% Inventory* 1,154 1,145 1,071 1,043 997 975 935 907 854 860 821 794 -MOM % Chg in # -2.9% -0.8% -6.5% -2.6% -4.4% -2.2% -4.1% -3.1% -5.8% 0.7% -4.6% -3.3% -YOY % Chg in # -21.9% -21.8% -27.1% -27.9% -28.9% -30.6% -32.9% -32.9% -32.6% -30.0% -32.6% -33.2% Completed s* 51 52 56 51 53 54 54 63 47 37 43 48 -MOM % Chg in # -13.5% 2.6% 7.1% -8.7% 2.9% 3.1% -0.9% 17.6% -25.4% -22.1% 16.4% 11.8% -YOY % Chg in # -24.6% -22.0% -10.3% -29.2% -23.3% -17.3% -26.5% -25.1% -31.7% -43.5% -18.5% -18.9% -12-Month Sum* 788 773 767 746 730 719 699 678 656 628 618 607 *Thousands of Units THE INVENTORY OF FORECLOSED HOMES EXPERIENCED 16 CONSECUTIVE MONTHS OF YEAR-OVER-YEAR DOUBLE-DIGIT DECLINES, AND 27 STRAIGHT MONTHS OF DECLINES reproduced in any form without express written permission. 4

Inventory by State <1% 1% - 2% 2% - 3% 3% - 4% >4% As of Source: CoreLogic Market Trends THIRTY-SIX STATES AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HAVE AN INVENTORY OF FORECLOSED HOMES LOWER THAN THE NATIONAL RATE Five states with the highest foreclosure inventory as a percentage of mortgaged homes Florida New Jersey New York Connecticut Maine 6.4% 6.3% 4.8% 3.4% 3.4% Five states with the lowest foreclosure inventory as a percentage of mortgaged homes Wyoming Alaska North Dakota Colorado Nebraska 0.4% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% TWENTY-EIGHT STATES SHOW DECLINES IN YEAR-OVER-YEAR FORECLOSURE INVENTORY OF GREATER THAN 30 PERCENT, WITH ARIZONA EXPERIENCING MORE THAN 50 PERCENT YEAR-OVER-YEAR DECLINE reproduced in any form without express written permission. 5

State Highlights Five states with the highest number of completed foreclosures during past 12 months Florida Michigan Texas California Georgia 116,000 52,000 39,000 38,000 35,000 Five states with the lowest number of completed foreclosures during past 12 months D.C. North Dakota Hawaii West Virginia wyoming 60 427 526 543 732 Percent of homes in foreclosure WY AK ND CO NE MN CA MT AZ SD VA MO MI UT TX TN NH WV WI KS NC AL GA MA AR MS ID IA LA KY WA OK DC IN SC VT OH RI NM OR PA DE NV IL MD HI CT ME NY NJ FL judicial Non-Judicial 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% Source: CoreLogic EVERY STATE POSTED A DOUBLE-DIGIT DECLINE IN FORECLOSURES YEAR OVER YEAR reproduced in any form without express written permission. 6

State Data Judicial States Judicial States Inventory Inventory Pct. Point Change from a Year Ago Completed s (12 months ending Jan. 2014) Serious Delinquency Rate National Inventory: 2.0% Florida 6.4% -3.7% 116,121 10.9% Ohio 2.0% -1.0% 27,759 5.3% Illinois 2.9% -1.7% 25,413 6.4% Indiana 1.9% -1.0% 17,373 4.9% Pennsylvania 2.4% -0.5% 14,321 5.6% Oklahoma 1.8% -0.8% 10,804 4.6% South Carolina 2.0% -1.0% 8,870 4.8% Louisiana 1.6% -0.7% 7,261 5.1% Inventory Pct. Point Change from a Year Ago: -0.9% Completed s (12 months ending ): 607,370 Serious Delinquency: 5.0% Decline in Seriously Delinquent Mortgages: 25.3% YOY Maryland 2.9% -0.6% 5,872 6.9% New Jersey 6.3% -1.0% 5,343 10.4% Kansas 1.1% -0.4% 4,778 3.6% Iowa 1.5% -0.6% 4,649 3.2% Connecticut 3.4% -0.8% 4,481 6.5% New York 4.8% -0.3% 4,468 7.9% Massachusetts 1.3% -0.7% 2,681 4.7% New Mexico 2.3% -0.8% 2,474 4.8% Kentucky 1.6% -0.6% 2,001 4.5% Nebraska 0.6% -0.2% 1,686 2.3% Delaware 2.5% -0.5% 1,528 6.0% Maine 3.4% -0.9% 837 6.4% Hawaii 3.3% -0.7% 526 5.1% North Dakota 0.5% -0.2% 427 1.1% South Dakota 0.7% -0.3% 2.0% Vermont 2.0% -0.5% 3.7% Source: CoreLogic reproduced in any form without express written permission. 7

State Data Non-Judicial States Non-Judicial States Inventory Inventory Pct. Point Change from a Year Ago Completed s (12 months ending Jan. 2014) Serious Delinquency Rate National Inventory: 2.0% Michigan 0.9% -0.5% 51,585 3.7% Texas 0.9% -0.3% 39,092 3.6% California 0.7% -0.6% 37,891 2.7% Georgia 1.2% -0.7% 34,521 5.1% North Carolina 1.2% -0.9% 25,735 4.2% Arizona 0.7% -0.7% 19,072 2.6% Washington 1.8% -0.7% 19,057 4.5% Tennessee 0.9% -0.5% 18,193 4.7% Missouri 0.8% -0.3% 13,334 3.5% Inventory Pct. Point Change from a Year Ago: -0.9% Completed s (12 months ending ): 607,370 Serious Delinquency: 5.0% Decline in Seriously Delinquent Mortgages: 25.3% YOY Virginia 0.8% -0.3% 11,858 3.0% Nevada 2.8% -1.8% 10,070 7.3% Colorado 0.5% -0.4% 8,970 2.2% Minnesota 0.6% -0.5% 8,142 2.6% Wisconsin 1.0% -0.7% 8,125 3.0% Alabama 1.2% -0.1% 7,707 5.1% Arkansas 1.3% -0.9% 5,550 5.3% Utah 0.9% -0.5% 4,142 2.9% Idaho 1.4% -0.7% 3,933 3.3% Oregon 2.4% -0.5% 2,989 4.3% New Hampshire 0.9% -0.4% 1,916 3.4% Rhode Island 2.2% -0.9% 1,524 6.4% Mississippi 1.3% -0.8% 1,127 6.2% Montana 0.7% -0.3% 958 1.9% Alaska 0.5% -0.2% 845 1.6% Wyoming 0.4% -0.1% 732 1.8% West Virginia 0.9% -0.3% 543 3.4% District of Columbia 1.9% -0.3% 60 4.9% Source: CoreLogic reproduced in any form without express written permission. 8

Metropolitan Area Highlights Data for the Largest Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs) Metropolitan Area Inventory Inventory Pct. Point Change from a Year Ago Completed s (12 months ending Jan. 2014) Serious Delinquency Rate Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA 1.3% -0.8% 20,502 5.2% Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 7.4% -3.2% 16,950 11.8% Chicago-Naperville-Arlington Heights, IL 3.4% -2.1% 14,718 7.4% Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL 6.5% -3.7% 11,750 10.8% Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 0.6% -0.8% 11,283 2.4% Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX 0.9% -0.3% 9,683 3.6% Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 1.0% -0.8% 8,094 4.1% Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC 1.4% -1.3% 7,837 4.6% St. Louis, MO-IL 1.0% -0.4% 7,598 3.8% Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 0.7% -0.6% 6,884 2.7% Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX 0.9% -0.3% 6,806 3.7% Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI 0.7% -0.5% 6,732 2.9% Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA 1.5% -0.8% 6,564 3.8% Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA 0.8% -0.6% 6,074 3.1% Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 1.5% -0.5% 4,337 4.2% Source: CoreLogic reproduced in any form without express written permission. 9

For an expanded perspective on housing economies and property markets, visit the CoreLogic Insights Blog and follow us on: CoreLogic CoreLogic Econ CORELOGIC NATIONAL REPORT METHODOLOGY The data in this report represents foreclosure activity reported through. This report separates state data into judicial versus non-judicial foreclosure state categories. In judicial foreclosure states, lenders must provide evidence to the courts of delinquency in order to move a borrower into foreclosure. In non-judicial foreclosure states, lenders can issue notices of default directly to the borrower without court intervention. This is an important distinction since judicial states, as a rule, have longer foreclosure timelines, thus affecting foreclosure statistics. A completed foreclosure occurs when a property is auctioned and results in the purchase of the home at auction by either a third party, such as an investor, or by the lender. If the home is purchased by the lender, it is moved into the lender s real estate owned (REO) inventory. In foreclosure by advertisement states, a redemption period begins after the auction and runs for a statutory period, e.g., six months. During that period, the borrower may regain the foreclosed home by paying all amounts due as calculated under the statute. For purposes of this Report, because so few homes are actually redeemed following an auction, it is assumed that the foreclosure process ends in foreclosure by advertisement states at the completion of the auction. The foreclosure inventory represents the number and share of mortgaged homes that have been placed into the process of foreclosure by the mortgage servicer. Mortgage servicers start the foreclosure process when the mortgage reaches a specific level of serious delinquency as dictated by the investor for the mortgage loan. Once a foreclosure is started, and absent the borrower paying all amounts necessary to halt the foreclosure, the home remains in foreclosure until the completed foreclosure results in the sale to a third party at auction or the home enters the lender s REO inventory. The data in this report accounts for only first liens against a property and does not include secondary liens. The foreclosure inventory is measured only against homes that have an outstanding mortgage. Homes with no mortgage liens can never be in foreclosure and are, therefore, excluded from the analysis. Approximately one-third of homes nationally are owned outright and do not have a mortgage. CoreLogic has approximately 85 percent coverage of U.S. foreclosure data. Source: CoreLogic The data provided is for use only by the primary recipient or the primary recipient s publication or broadcast. This data may not be re-sold, republished or licensed to any other source, including publications and sources owned by the primary recipient s parent company without prior written permission from CoreLogic. Any CoreLogic data used for publication or broadcast, in whole or in part, must be sourced as coming from CoreLogic, a data and analytics company. For use with broadcast or web content, the citation must directly accompany first reference of the data. If the data is illustrated with maps, charts, graphs or other visual elements, the CoreLogic logo must be included on screen or website. Data provided may not be modified without the prior written permission of CoreLogic. Do not use the data in any unlawful manner. This data is compiled from public records, contributory databases and proprietary analytics, and its accuracy is dependent upon these sources. About CoreLogic CoreLogic (NYSE: CLGX) is a leading property information, analytics and services provider in the United States and Australia. The company s combined data from public, contributory, and proprietary sources includes over 3.3 billion records spanning more than 40 years, providing detailed coverage of property, mortgages and other encumbrances, consumer credit, tenancy, location, hazard risk and related performance information. The markets CoreLogic serves include real estate and mortgage finance, insurance, capital markets, transportation and government. CoreLogic delivers value to clients through unique data, analytics, workflow technology, advisory and managed services. Clients rely on CoreLogic to help identify and manage growth opportunities, improve performance and mitigate risk. Headquartered in Irvine, Calif., CoreLogic operates in seven countries. For more information, please visit www.corelogic.com. CORELOGIC and the CoreLogic logo are trademarks of CoreLogic, Inc. and/or its subsidiaries. Contact For more information, please email bvisini@corelogic.com. January 17-NFR-JAN14-0214-00 2014 reproduced in any form without express written permission. 10