Performance of Dow Jones Industrial Average: micro and macro-level analysis. Luis Palacios Rabih Moussawi Denys Glushkov Bob Zarazowski

Similar documents
Online Appendix for. Whistleblowers and Outcomes of Financial Misrepresentation Enforcement Actions

Revised October 17, 2016

Midterm elections, Resolution of political uncertainty, and U.S. equity market premiums

ECONOMIC & REVENUE UPDATE

Relative Strength Strategies for Investing

EMPLOYEE TENURE IN 2014

Employment Situation: Ohio and U.S. (Seasonally Adjusted) 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 -5,000. In This Issue

Employment Situation: Ohio and U.S. (Seasonally Adjusted) 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000. In This Issue

Table 1: Major Indicators of Labor Market Activity for New Jersey Seasonally Adjusted 2016 Benchmark Labor Force Data (resident)

Kansas Department of Revenue Office of Policy and Research State Sales Tax Collections by NAICS

Economic Outlook. William Strauss Senior Economist and Economic Advisor Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

Employment Data (establishment)

Economic Outlook 1. William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic Advisor Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. Economic Outlook

U.S. Automotive Outlook

Data current as of: April 4, % 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 250, , , ,000 50, , , , , ,000

HOUSTON-THE WOODLANDS-SUGAR LAND METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREA (H-W-S MSA) Visit our website at

James K. Polk United States President ( ) Mecklenburg County NC

Table Of Contents. Table Of Contents. OAK ASSOCIATES, ltd.

Current Employment Statistics

Current Employment Statistics

January 2014 Non-Manufacturing ISM Report On Business

State of California January 22, 2010 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT S. Bascom Ave. (408) Campbell, CA 95008

Data current as of: August 5, ,200,000 1,000, , , , , , , , , , , ,000

Unemployment Rate Edges Lower to 5.0 Percent Employment Down in December

R E T A I L S A L E S S U R V E Y

Kazakhstan s economy expanded by 4.2% in 1H17, supported by growth in mining, manufacturing, construction and transportation sectors

Kansas Department of Revenue Office of Policy and Research State Sales Tax Collections by NAICS Calendar Year 2007 January-07.

Economic and Residential Outlook 1. William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic Advisor Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

A Detailed Analysis of U.S. Bear Markets

GOAL 6 FIRMS PARTICIPATING IN FOREIGN EXPORT TRADE

Economic Forecast OUTPUT AND EMPLOYMENT WHAT THE TABLE SHOWS:

Economics. Market Indicators Session 2

Online Appendix to. The Structure of Information Release and the Factor Structure of Returns

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE SELL IN MAY AND GO AWAY: IS IT STILL A RELIABLE INVESTING STRATEGY?

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, LICENSING AND REGULATION Office of Workforce Information and Performance 1100 North Eutaw Street Baltimore, MD 21201

Capital Expenditure Trends: When and Where Will Firms Start Investing Again? Peter Loveridge European Manager, World Industry Service 24 th June 2009

Ontario Economic Accounts

Key Labor Market and Economic Metrics

- US LEI & CEI - Yardeni Research, Inc.

Decline in Economic Activity Larger Than Advance GDP Estimate February 27, 2009

State of Ohio Workforce. 2 nd Quarter

Data current as of: June 3, ,000, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,000

Western New York ECONOMIC NEWS Richard J. Wehle School of Business Canisius College

Economics. Economic Growth Session 1

Internet address: USDL

ECONOMIC AND MARKET COMMENTARY OUR MISSION

EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS

Investment Commentary August 2017

A Labor Market Information Publication FOURTH QUARTER 2002

The labor market has continued to strengthen and economic activity has been expanding at a moderate pace this year.

NMI at 60.3% Business Activity Index at 64.9% New Orders Index at 63.8% Employment Index at 59.6%

MANUFACTURING IN IOWA

North Carolina s June Employment Figures Released

U.S. CAPITAL SPENDING PATTERNS

AGM Survey Results NIRI NIRI 2010 Annual Conference Onsite Survey: Annual General Meetings

Online appendix to Understanding Weak Capital Investment: the Role of Market Concentration and Intangibles

World Industry Outlook: Which Industries Gain and Which Lose in a Slowing Global Economy? Mark Killion, CFA Managing Director World Industry Service

Rajeev A. Vaidya. IFSR 5 parts of disciplined buying. Disclaimer in plain language: 4/11/2019. Opinions are like noses, everyone has one!

PRODUCTIVITY AND COSTS Third Quarter 2011, Revised

NAB MONTHLY BUSINESS SURVEY JANUARY 2018 FURTHER CONFIRMATION OF BUSINESS STRENGTH

NMI at 56% Business Activity Index at 61.5% New Orders Index at 58.3% Employment Index at 52.7%

Modest Economic Growth and Falling GDP Gap

Will the Recovery Ever End? Boulder Economic Forecast

Sole Proprietorship Returns, 2004

United States. Gross Domestic Product Percent change over year-ago level. Industrial Production Index, 2010=100. Unemployment Rate Percent

EMBARGOED UNTIL: 11:30AM AEDT, 30 JANUARY 2018 NAB MONTHLY BUSINESS SURVEY

nc today october 2006 Photo courtesy of NC Division of Tourism, Film and Sports development. Linn Cove Viaduct, Blue Ridge Parkway, NC

SUMMARY OF SELECTED ECONOMIC INDICATORS

May 2015 FINANCIAL MARKET REVIEW

7409 Market Street Wilmington, NC 28411

Appendix. A. Firm-Specific DeterminantsofPIN, PIN_G, and PIN_B

Playing The Bull Market s Final Inning(s)

Is the Weekend Effect Really a Weekend Effect?

Michigan s January Unemployment Rate Moves Up Seasonally

Internet Appendix for: Does Going Public Affect Innovation?

Hedging inflation by selecting stock industries

US Business Cycle Risk Report

HELP! I m an Accidental Government Information Librarian

The Outlook and Current Policy Challenges

State of the Economy: US, New Mexico

Animal Production, Dairy, Beef, Sheep, Chickens, Etc $ Forestry Management and Sales Standing Timber Only $350.

SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA UNIVERSITY Economic Reporter

MASS LAYOFFS DECEMBER 2012 ANNUAL TOTALS 2012

The relatively slow growth of employment has

Liquidity Risk Management for Portfolios

There has been considerable discussion of the possibility

India Data Releases. Strong IP Growth Maintained in May JM MORGAN STANLEY. For important disclosures, refer to the Disclosure Section.

Single-family home sales and construction are not expected to regain 2005 peaks

FRIENDSWOOD PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM FORM

NAB MONTHLY BUSINESS SURVEY JUNE 2018

Old Dominion University 2016 Regional Economic Forecast. Strome College of Business

National Economic Indicators. May 7, 2018

LABOR SITUATION Office of Research

9 March 2018 AUSTRALIAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS. Services and construction stay on track in February

Management Science Online Appendix Tables: Hiring Cheerleaders: Board Appointments of "Independent" Directors

Outlook 2018: IE and Southern California So Cal Economic Summit Corona Chamber of Commerce March 29, 2018

Report on Ward 3. Prepared by the Burlington Economic Development Corporation

Responses to Survey of Market Participants

NAB MONTHLY BUSINESS SURVEY NOVEMBER 2018

$1,600,000. Boston Reid LAKESIDE BUSINESS PARK. 117 Crosslake Park Drive Mooresville, NC SITE FEATURES. Lead 2 Real Estate Group

Transcription:

Performance of Dow Jones Industrial Average: micro and macro-level analysis Luis Palacios Rabih Moussawi Denys Glushkov Bob Zarazowski

1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 197 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 198 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 199 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 Motivation Dow tends to hover around 1, and 1, thresholds for some time. Is it psychological anchoring of investors or there are fundamental explanations behind it? DJIA 1, 1, 1

Overlaying 1966-1982 DJIA performance with 1997-21 16, 1,2 14, 1, 12, 1, 8 8, 6 1997_21 1962-1982 6, 4 4, 2, 2

196 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1967 1968 1969 197 1971 1972 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1988 1989 199 1991 1992 1993 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 Micro approach: DJ constituents Pretty impressive coverage in terms of fraction of the entire market cap, ~2% 35% Dow Jones Coverage as % of Total Equity Market Capitalization 3% 25% 2% 15% 1% 5% % DJ Coverage % of Market Cap

19661 19666 196611 19674 19679 19682 19687 196812 19695 19691 1973 1978 19711 19716 197111 19724 19729 19732 19737 197312 19745 19741 19753 19758 19761 19766 197611 19774 19779 19782 19787 197812 19795 19791 1983 1988 19811 19816 198111 19824 19829 Performance of DOW vs total stock market How good was DJ composition reflective of the overall US economy over time? DJIA returned less than the overall market, especially during 1977-1982 period. 14 $1 Buy and Hold DJIA vs Total Equity Market based on real returns incl. dividends (adjusted for inflation) 12 1 8 6 4 2 DJIA with Dividends Total Market Returns incl Dividends

19661 19665 19669 19671 19675 19679 19681 19685 19689 19691 19695 19699 1971 1975 1979 19711 19715 19719 19721 19725 19729 19731 19735 19739 19741 19745 19749 19751 19755 19759 19761 19765 19769 19771 19775 19779 19781 19785 19789 19791 19795 19799 1981 1985 1989 19811 19815 19819 19821 19825 19829 S&P appears to be more reflective of the overall market performance Performance of Dow Jones versus Total Market Index vs SP5, levels (Excluding Dividends reinvestment and inflation adjustment) 1966-1982 1,8 16 1,6 1,4 1,2 1, 8 6 4 2 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Dow Jones Index Level Total Market Index S&P 5

198211 19834 19839 19842 19847 198412 19855 19851 19863 19868 19871 19876 198711 19884 19889 19892 19897 198912 1995 1991 19913 19918 19921 19926 199211 19934 19939 19942 19947 199412 19955 19951 19963 19968 19971 19976 199711 19984 19989 19992 Much more aligned later due to better representation of key industries of the economy 12, Performance of Dow Jones versus Total Market Index (Excluding Dividends reinvestment) 1982-1999 1,4 1, 1,2 8, 6, 1, 8 6 4, 4 2, 2 Dow Jones Index Level Total Market Index S&P 5

19994 19997 19991 21 24 27 21 211 214 217 211 221 224 227 221 231 234 237 231 241 244 247 241 251 254 257 251 261 264 267 261 271 274 277 271 281 284 287 281 291 294 297 291 Dow as better gauge of overall market performance in the most recent period 16, Performance of Dow Jones versus Total Market Index (Excluding Dividends reinvestment) 1999-29 1,8 14, 1,6 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 1,4 1,2 1, 8 6 4 2, 2 Dow Jones Index Level Total Market Index S&P 5

Fama and French 12 Industry Classification Industry Name Description 1 NoDur Consumer NonDurables -- Food, Tobacco, Textiles, Apparel, Leather, Toys 2 Durbl Consumer Durables -- Cars, TV's, Furniture, Household Appliances 3 Manuf Manufacturing -- Machinery, Trucks, Planes, Off Furn, Paper, Com Printing 4 Enrgy Oil, Gas, and Coal Extraction and Products 5 Chems Chemicals and Allied Products 6 BusEq Business Equipment -- Computers, Software, and Electronic Equipment 7 Telcm Telephone and Television Transmission 8 Utils Utilities 9 Shops Wholesale, Retail, and Some Services (Laundries, Repair Shops) 1 Hlth Healthcare, Medical Equipment, and Drugs 11 Money Finance 12 Other Other -- Mines, Constr, BldMt, Trans, Hotels, Bus Serv, Entertainment

19661 19666 196611 19674 19679 19682 19687 196812 19695 19691 1973 1978 19711 19716 197111 19724 19729 19732 19737 197312 19745 19741 19753 19758 19761 19766 197611 19774 19779 19782 19787 197812 19795 19791 1983 1988 19811 19816 198111 19824 19829 15.% DJIA Constituents Performance - By Industry 1966-1982 1.% 5.%.% -5.% -1.% -15.% -2.% -25.% NoDur Durbl Manuf Enrgy Chems BusEq Telcm Utils Shops Hlth Money Other

19661 19666 196611 19674 19679 19682 19687 196812 19695 19691 1973 1978 19711 19716 197111 19724 19729 19732 19737 197312 19745 19741 19753 19758 19761 19766 197611 19774 19779 19782 19787 197812 19795 19791 1983 1988 19811 19816 198111 19824 19829 25.% Overall Market Performance - By Industry 1966-1982 2.% 15.% 1.% 5.%.% -5.% -1.% -15.% NoDur Durbl Manuf Enrgy Chems BusEq Telcm Utils Shops Hlth Money Other

BusEq Chems Durbl Enrgy Hlth Manuf Money NoDur Other Shops Telcm Utils Correlation of DJIA Index with Cumulative Industry Returns, by Decade 196 7% 97% 95% 88% 77% 81% 66% 82% 84% 79% 9% 93% 197 5% 62% 66% 19% 53% 55% 44% 55% 39% 74% 24% 27% 198 87% 1% 99% 96% 99% 99% 98% 99% 99% 98% 96% 97% 199 96% 99% 99% 98% 99% 96% 99% 97% 96% 98% 95% 96% 2 41% 62% 68% 63% 85% 87% 81% 68% 89% 77% 44% 74%

3% Correlations and Performance of Dow Jones Returns with Monthly Industry Returns: 1966-1982 25% 2% 15% 1% 5% % BusEq Chems Durbl Enrgy Hlth Manuf Money NoDur Other Shops Telcm Utils Average Annual Correlations Total Cumulative Returns

25% Correlations and Performance of Dow Jones Returns with Monthly Industry Returns: 1999-29 2% 15% 1% 5% % BusEq Chems Durbl Enrgy Hlth Manuf Money NoDur Other Shops Telcm Utils -5% -1% Average Annual Correlations Total Cumulative Returns

Macro look: DOW and Fundamentals How much Dow performance is correlated with the overall economic indicators We looked at CPI (consumer price index) PPI (producer price index) Default spread (difference between Moody s Baa and Aaa-rated portfolios Term spread (measuring slope of the yield curve) Quarterly productivity of the business and manufacturing sectors of the economy Industrial Production index (from the Federal Reserve) Aggregate dividend yield of the market Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) and New Factory Orders from the Institute for Supply Management Seasonally-adjusted Initial and continuing claims Total nonfarm and private payrolls

Correlations with fundamentals 1966-1982, 1982-1999, 1999-29 DJIA S&P5 DJIA S&P 5 DJIA S&P 5 Period jan 1966-Nov 1982 Dec 1982-Mar 1999 Apr 1999-Dec 29 Mean 853.37 95.46 352.5 44.14 1523.15 125.2 STD 95.28 16.66 2247.53 273.35 1429.2 197.21 Nobs 251. 251. 196. 196. 123. 123. DJIA (level) 1..79 1. 1. 1..9 S&P 5 (level).79 1. 1. 1..9 1. CPI (all items).24.71.89.87.3. CPI (less energy).25.71.89.87.23 -.7 Default Spread.16.55 -.7 -.68 -.38 -.5 Term Spread.7 -.1 -.45 -.45 -.5 -.66 Industrial Production.39.74.97.96.78.61 Business Sector Productivity.4.73.91.91.19 -.14 Manufactruting Sector Productivity N/A N/A.97.96.27 -.5 Producer Price Index.22.68.83.8.43.18 Value-weighted Dividend Yield.18.54 -.85 -.84.34.11 Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) from ISM.18 -.16 -.11 -.12.28.3 New Factory Orders.19 -.15 -.13 -.14.14.14 Initial Claims (seasonally adjusted) -.7.31 -.44 -.43 -.48 -.61 Continuing Clams (seasonally adjusted) -.3.28 -.28 -.27 -.48 -.68 Total nonfarm payrolls.35.74.89.88.53.33 Total Private Payrolls.34.75.9.88.59.44 RD/Assets.8.28.92.91.66.47

197 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1977 1978 1979 198 1981 1982 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 25 26 27 28 Can proxies for the innovation intensity of the US economy explain DOW performance? RD/Assets ratio and DOW performance seem to comove reasonably well: 93% correlation over the entire period RD/Assets ratio flat during 197-1982, just as Dow is flat around 1, mark Steady increase in R&D is accompanied by a steady increase in Dow Relatively flat Dow performance around 1, is associated with flat (even decreasing R&D during 1999-29 14, 7.% 12, 6.% 1, 5.% 8, 4.% 6, 3.% 4, 2.% 2, 1.%.% DJIA Median RD/Assets

19621 19634 19647 19651 19671 19684 19697 1971 19721 19734 19747 19751 19771 19784 19797 1981 19821 19834 19847 19851 19871 19884 19897 1991 19921 19934 19947 19951 19971 19984 19997 21 221 234 247 251 271 284 297 Industrial Production: leading or lagging? $1 $1 2 $ Industrial Production DJIA (real terms + div)

Composition of US economy has been changing during the period. However, the general pattern, from goods to services was not alter. No change on change. Number of Employees by Industry (Proportion of Total) 1962 1982 1998 28 All Industries 1. 1. 1. 1. Selected Groups Agriculture 3.1% 1.7% 1.%.9% Construction 4.6% 4.2% 4.7% 5.2% Manufacturing 24.7% 18.1% 13.3% 9.4% whole sale trade 4.5% 4.8% 4.2% 4.2% Retail Trade 9.6% 1.9% 11.2% 1.9% Finance, Insurance, Real Estate 3.4% 4.3% 5.8% 5.7% Professional and business services 4.3% 7.5% 11.5% 12.6% Educational Services 1.1% 1.4% 1.7% 2.2% Health Care and Social Assistance 3.2% 7.1% 9.5% 11.1% Arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation, and food services 4.9% 7.% 8.5% 9.5% Government 2.1% 19.5% 16.9% 17.4% Source: BEA

Price/Earnings Ratios as Predictor of Future 2-year Returns? (Source: Shiller) See 197-1985

Historical P/E Ratios. Would Historical high ratios imply lower returns in the future?

25 Exploration on House Bubble 2 s 2 15 1 5 1962 1967 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 22 27 Real Home Price Index Real Building Cost Index 14 Proportion of GDP into Construction and Real Estate activities 1998-29 12 1 8 6 4 2 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Construction Real Estate - Finance