EBS Law School Arbitration Day 18 November :00 p.m. Lecture Room Sydney

Similar documents
Effective Fact Finding vs. Information Overload: Too Much Paper in Arbitration?

Current Issues in International Commercial and Investment Arbitration

KEYNOTE SPEAKER S PROFILE. Professor Surya Subedi, University of Leeds

Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)

Arbitration with States and State Entities under the ICC Rules

Summer Program +S1. 1page. Course Name. Course Introduction. Summer Program +S Economic and Trade Law and Practice in East Asia Program

BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ICSID)

BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ICSID)

The Effect of Sanctions on Arbitration: Alternative Venues

LAUNCH OF ICC COMMISSION REPORT: FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION

LAUNCHING YOUR ARBITRATION

Managing a German GmbH

PROGRAMME. ICC Arbitration TRAINING AND CONFERENCE. Melbourne, Australia, 28 November 2016

Conference on Dispute Resolution in Asia and Beyond: Progress and Trends

ASA Conference Shaping Arbitral Proceedings to Best Examine Quantum 3 February 2017 Hotel Président Wilson 47, Quai Wilson 1211 Geneva PROGRAMME

2016 RUSSIAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION SURVEY: THE IMPACT OF SANCTIONS ON COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION

Pranav Mago Head (South Asia)

A two day symposium on International Commercial Arbitration

ANATOMY OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION. E. Y. Park Co-Head, International Arbitration & Litigation Group Kim & Chang 12 February 2018

Advanced training Market overview, securitisation structures and regulation

Energy, Ethics and the Effective Management of Arbitration

Public consultation on modalities for investment protection and ISDS in TTIP

ICC Arbitration Today: Bridging the Cultural Gap in International Arbitration

20 Years of the Energy Charter Treaty Conference ICSID/World Bank Offices Paris, France March 7, 2014

All in-house counsel, legal practitioners, arbitrators and academics interested in the field of dispute resolution.

9 th CAM Annual Conference. QUANTIFICATION OF DAMAGES IN COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION: MISSION IMPOSSIBLE? Programme

ClientBrief. International Litigation & Arbitration Practice

PROGRAMME SUMMARY PROGRAM SUMMARY ABOUT THE CHARTERED INSTTITUE OF ARBITRATORS

Tenth Annual ICC New York Conference

INVESTMENT, TAX AND TRADE ISSUES AFFECTING FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT & SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONES

BAFA/U.S. Export Control Forum 2018

ASA Conference. Commercial Arbitration Involving States: Public Interests and Private Justice? Friday 22 January 2016

Foreign Banks in Germany

The past year has been one of new records and new peaks for dispute. The Future of Dispute Resolution in Singapore

Comparison between SCC arbitration and CIETAC arbitration

Opening remarks: Discussion on Investment in TTIP

Study of a mock case under the 2012 ICC Rules of Arbitration

Who should attend This programme will benefit practicing lawyers, arbitrators, judges, engineers, academics, corporate counsel and LL.M. students.

Brexit and International Arbitration

Update on the EU Unitary Patent System. EU-Japan Centre, Tokyo 28 September 2017

ASA Annual Conference

International Arbitration and Economic Sanctions

Young Arbitration Practitioners (YAP) Conference

The New Arbitration Law in Qatar and the UNCITRAL model law: Key differences

CHOOSE COPENHAGEN AS VENUE AND PLACE OF ARBITRATION

One Belt One Road and Investment Treaty Disputes

VINAYAK P. PRADHAN. : LLB (Hons) Singapore. Appointed Acting Director of AIAC on 21 st November 2018

CONFERENCE ON INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT ARBITRATION SUPREME COURT OF SINGAPORE 20 JANUARY 2010 WELCOME REMARKS BY CHIEF JUSTICE CHAN SEK KEONG

12 September 2011: Release of the New ICC Rules of Arbitration.

INDEPENDENCE AND IMPARTIALITY OF ARBITRATORS IN LITHUANIA

BIOGRAPHICAL DATA HANS VAN HOUTTE

INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE - PALESTINE

ICC ARBITRATION WORKSHOP

ICC Arbitration Today: Arbitrator Independence

THE RESPONSIBLE TRUSTEE

ASA Conference. The Arbitrators Initiative: When, Why and How Should it be Used? 6 February Hotel Président Wilson 47, Quai Wilson 1211 Geneva

Ann Ryan Robertson International Partner

ICC Asia Pacific Conference. East Meets West: Evolving Issues in International Arbitration in the Asia-Pacific Region

Arbitration. Study of a mock case - under the 2012 ICC Arbitration Rules

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHANGING DYNAMICS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN INDIA

China Arbitration Day Munich, 16 to 18 September Building Bridges Backing Business

Institutional vs. ad hoc arbitration: when and why?

Marketing of AIF by non-eu AIFM / Third Country Managers in Germany after 21 July 2013

Effective Distribution Strategies in the EU 24 February Robert Bell Eckart Budelmann Kathie Claret Arturo Battista

Soh Lieh Sieng BEng(Hons) MSc(Construction Law & Arbitration) FCIOB FCIArb FCABE FACostE FAE FSIArb FMIArb FMSAdj

Arbitrability of IP Disputes in Russia

Financial Services Masterclass Australian Credit Licence and Australian Financial Services Licence training

Emerging Issues in International Arbitration: What a New Arbitral Seat Can Anticipate

Professional Background 2015-present: Partner, King & Spalding, International Arbitration Group, Singapore

Agenda (V3.7) Committee for Development Policy. - 19th plenary session

Suggested Changes to the ICSID Rules and Regulations. Working Paper of the ICSID Secretariat. May 12, 2005

ARBITRATION RULES. of the Finland Chamber of Commerce

Inaugural Conference of EFILA Final Draft programme. EU law and investment treaty law: convergence, conflict, or conversation?

Scandinavian PIDA Seminar on International Commercial Arbitration

3/27. State Parties in ContractBased Arbitration: The Theory and Practice of PrivatePublic Arbitration. Highlights

Maintaining a level playing field in the financial markets crisis applying the EU State aid rules to measures to stabilize financial markets

Two recent pro-arbitration cases from Indian courts continue the judicial trend towards recognition of arbitral independence

Working Party of Senior Budget Officials

MIAC 2014 THE THIRD BIENNIAL MAURITIUS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE. The Litmus Test: Challenges to Awards and. Enforcement of Awards in Africa

Best Practices in Arbitration for Hospitality Cases

10 th Annual Conference of the Real Estate Share Initiative

Sea of Change Regulatory reforms charting a new course

Sally Harpole 何蓉. International arbitrator, mediator and attorney with over 40 years of experience in Asia.

Practical Tips on Commencement of Arbitration

Maritime Arbitration in a Rising Asia: The Singapore and China Experience

CETA: Europe's Next Trade Step

Swiss Arbitration Joint Seminar by Homburger and Rentsch Legal. January 24, 2013

PROCEDURE AND SERVICES UNDER THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES

10th Anniversary Edition The Baker McKenzie International Arbitration Yearbook. Myanmar

Jan K. Schaefer. Matters 1

Response to CMA consultation document: guidance on the CMA s approval of voluntary redress schemes

Brexit Paper 2: International Arbitration

ICC INDONESIA WORKSHOP

ICC Events. INTERNATIONAL CONTRACTS: Study of a mock case Negotiating, Drafting, Dispute Resolution, Different Cultural and Legal Approaches


SCC PRACTICE NOTE. SCC Board Decisions on Challenges to Arbitrators STOCKHOLM, 2016 ANJA HAVEDAL IPP

Why Finland Should Adopt the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration Christopher R. Seppälä

Is the current free-trade policy an opportunity or threat to SMEs in the Netherlands?

CLAIMANTS UNBOUND DIRECT ACTIONS AGAINST INSURERS UNDER THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION

Transcription:

EBS Law School Arbitration Day 18 November 2016 2:00 p.m. Lecture Room Sydney

All new and all better? From New Rules to New Courts: The Quest for Improved Systems of Arbitration 1:30 p.m. Registration 2:00 p.m. Dispute Resolution in Asia: Dominated by the Singaporean Merlion? There is no major arbitral institution that has not reformed its arbitration rules in recent years in the course of an ongoing quest for improved systems of arbitration. The German Institution of Arbitration ( DIS ) is following suit and has just started a reform process to update its 1998 Arbitration Rules. Only one major arbitral institution has, however, updated its international rules twice in only three years: the Singapore International Arbitration Centre ( SIAC ). The new 2016 SIAC Rules introduced a new early dismissal mechanism and regulations for multi-contract disputes. Could the fairly detailed SIAC Rules be a role model for the future DIS Rules or should the 2012 Arbitration Rules of the International Chamber of Commerce rather act as a model? The SIAC Rules may furthermore not be the only Singaporean invention where Singapore leads by example: The new Singapore International Commercial Court ( SICC ) was officially launched on 5 January 2015. The SICC is intended to be the Asian centre for resolving international commercial disputes, in particular, international banking and financial disputes. Does Europe need a court like this as well? Questions like these will be discussed by our three experienced panelists. Speakers Moderator Claudia Annacker, Cleary Gottlieb, Paris Simon Greenberg, Clifford Chance, Paris Elan Krishna, Clifford Chance, Singapore Prof. Dr. Matthias Weller, EBS Law School 3:30 p.m. Coffee Break

4:00 p.m. The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: a role model for international arbitration? Happy Birthday! The Iran-United States Tribunal celebrates its 35th birthday this year. Despite the fact that it has been labelled as the most significant arbitral body in history and despite its potential major relevance especially for investor-state arbitration, the Tribunal s work is a work behind the scenes even for many arbitration specialists. How much have the Court s rulings (secretly) influenced the world of arbitration. And could and should this institution be a role model for dispute resolution mechanisms in international trade agreements such as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership ( TTIP )? The EU Commission has already answered the latter question with yes : Its proposal for dispute settlement in TTIP takes its inspiration from adjudicatory models which operate between states (such as the WTO bodies) or are controlled by states (such as the Iran- US Claims Tribunal). Is this justified and the right path? Join us for a debate on these topics! Speakers Moderator Dr. Cristina Hoss, Legal Adviser to Judge Bruno Simma, Iran-US Claims Tribunal, Den Haag Dr. Alexandra Diehl, LL.M., Clifford Chance, Frankfurt 5:00 p.m. Coffee Break

5:30 p.m. TTIP and CETA: On a Road to Nowhere or to Success? Regional integration has gained a lot of momentum over the last decades: As of 1 July 2016, more than 600 Regional Trade Agreements were notified with the World Trade Organization. A growing number of them include investor protection and investor-state dispute resolution mechanisms. It turned out to be one of the central questions in the TTIP and CETA negotiations how to organize convincingly dispute resolution. In CETA, the EU s new approach has been implemented: institutionalization or deprivatization, permanent tribunals, appeal proceedings, formalized qualification and impartiality requirements for the arbitrators, 15 in total, nominated by the EU and Canada. Yet, a constitutional complaint (Verfassungsbeschwerde) against the investor-state dispute settlement provisions (and other issues of CETA) is pending. The Panel will discuss pros and cons of the EU s new approach, thereby taking into consideration the 13 October preliminary CETA decision of the German Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) and the outcome of the US elections. Key Note Panel Discussion Moderators Free Trade Agreements: New Rules for Globalization? Dr. Hubertus Bardt, Cologne Institute for Economic Research (IDW) Prof. Dr. R. Alexander Lorz, Secretary for Public Education, German State of Hesse, Wiesbaden Dr. Kinka Gerke-Unger, US Consulate General Frankfurt Prof. Dr. André Schmidt, EBS Business School/University Witten-Herdecke Prof. Dr. Mathias Wolkewitz, General Counsel Legal, Taxes, Insurances, Wintershall AG Prof. Dr. Andreas Fisahn, University of Bielefeld Dr. Alexandra Diehl, LL.M., Clifford Chance, Frankfurt/Prof. Dr. Matthias Weller, EBS Law School, Wiesbaden 7:15 p.m. Wine Tasting Reception with Welcoming Remarks by Burkhard Schneider, LL.M., Clifford Chance, Frankfurt

Prof. Dr. Matthias Weller, Mag.rer.publ. Chair for Civil Law, Civil Procedure and Private International Law EBS Law School Director of the Research Center for Transnational Commercial Dispute Resolution (TCDR) Gustav-Stresemann-Ring 3, 65189 Wiesbaden media partner Office Management: Claudia Mueller claudia.mueller@ebs.edu Tel.: +49 (0) 611 7102 2214 Fax: +49 (0) 611 7102 10 2214 Do not hesitate to contact us anytime if you have questions! The EBS Law School is located in the centre of Wiesbaden in 5 min walking distance from Wiesbaden Railway Main Station and in 30 min driving distance from Frankfurt International Airport. Recommendations for accommodation nearby: Motel One Wiesbaden Kaiser-Friedrich Ring 81 65185 Wiesbaden Tel.: +49 (0) 611 45 02 80 Dorint Hotel Pallas Wiesbaden Auguste-Viktoria-Str. 15 65185 Wiesbaden Tel.: +49 (0) 611 33 06 0 B&B Hotel Wiesbaden Mainzer Str. 89 65189 Wiesbaden Tel.: +49 (0) 611 73 66 90 Looking forward to seeing you! Please help us planning the event by registering (claudia.mueller@ebs.edu)

Düsseldorf Königsallee 59 40215 Düsseldorf Tel: +49 211 4355 0 Fax: +49 211 4355 5600 Frankfurt am Main Mainzer Landstraße 46 60325 Frankfurt am Main Tel: +49 69 7199 01 Fax: +49 69 7199 4000 München Theresienstraße 4-6 80333 München Tel: +49 89 21632 0 Fax: +49 89 21632 8600 www.cliffordchance.com Clifford Chance Deutschland LLP, 2016 J201610180049804