Low Income ( Poverty ) Lines

Similar documents
Low Income in Canada: Using the Market Basket Measure

FACT SHEET: LOW INCOME in LONDON

Low Income Lines,

Low Income Lines,

Low Income Cut-offs for 2005 and Low Income Measures for 2004

The National Child Benefit. Progress Report SP E

Low income cut-offs for 2008 and low income measures for 2007

Calculating the Living Wage in Communities Across Ontario Leeds, Grenville Lanark 2018

Low Income Lines and Financial Security in Retirement

context about this report what is poverty?

A BROADER PERSPECTIVE OF MEASURING THE WELL-BEING OF RURAL FARM AND NON-FARM HOUSEHOLDS

FACT SHEET: POVERTY IN CALGARY

2017 Whistler Living Wage FINAL REPORT JOCELYN CHEN

This document is also available on the federal/provincial/territorial internet Web site at

TITLE OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL CANADA S FIRST POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY. OECD Policy Workshop on Enhancing Child Well-being: From Ends to Means?

Income Support in Relation to Housing in Canada and Selected Other Countries: Final Synthesis Report

2016 Census: Release 4. Income. Dr. Doug Norris Senior Vice President and Chief Demographer. September 20, Environics Analytics

STATUS OF WOMEN OFFICE. Socio-Demographic Profiles of Saskatchewan Women. Aboriginal Women

CALCULATING THE LIVING WAGE FOR NIAGARA REGION. The Niagara Poverty Reduction Network

WHAT IS A LIVING WAGE?

Minimum Wage Review Public Consultation January 2008

Comparing Poverty Measures Ontario

Submission to House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance Pre-Budget Consultation Giving Priority to Low-Income, Unattached, Women Seniors

New Brunswick Provincial Poverty Profile

Child Poverty and the Child Care Solution

A Family Living Wage for Manitoba

2014 Progress Report on the Prince Edward Island Social Action Plan July 2014

Response to the Manitoba Government Employment and Income Assistance Rate Review 2013

Canada Social Report. Poverty Reduction Strategy Summary, Manitoba

Canadian Poverty Reduction Strategy Brief: Measuring Poverty, Meeting Targets

Options for Increasing the Incomes of Manitoba EIA Participants

LIVING WAGE $ Regina s PER HOUR

Public Health and Social Services Committee

BUDGET Québec and the Fight Against Poverty. Social Solidarity

The Various Measures of Low Income in Canada: Strengths, weaknesses, impacts

Household spending on health care

Pre-Budget Submission to the Honourable Scott Fielding, M.L.A. Minister of Finance Province of Manitoba

3RD SESSION, 41ST LEGISLATURE, ONTARIO 67 ELIZABETH II, Bill 30

Cowichan Valley Living Wage 2015 A project of:

Peterborough Social Planning Council 2015 Living Wage Report

LIVING WAGE $ Weyburn s PER HOUR

GLOSSARY. MEDICAID: A joint federal and state program that helps people with low incomes and limited resources pay health care costs.

6&27,$16 72 ($7 +($/7+<" ýûüýǎ -/$ $+ /*-4Ǎ ** Ǎ *./$)"Ǎ 0++' ( )/ -4Ǎ '.

Poverty Costs Saskatchewan: A New Approach to Prosperity for All

Expand eligibility for the Cost of Living Allowance to all Income Support clients who maintain a residence in coastal Labrador

Understanding Income Distribution and Poverty

DETERMINATION OF RESIDENCY STATUS (LEAVING CANADA)

Living Wage in Whitehorse, Yukon: 2016

Welfare in Canada 2012

Evaluation of the National Child Benefit Initiative

Schedule J: Your Expenses 12/13

Travel Insurance Guide for Professionals. The Introductory Guide to Travel Insurance

2.0 Total Health Expenditure by Source of Finance

Fighting Poverty. New Brunswick Drug Plan. Who should pay? Proposal submitted to the Minister of Health by the NB Common Front for Social Justice

Make Poverty History Manitoba 432 Ellice Avenue, Winnipeg MB, R3B 1Y4, (204) ext 1230

Living Wage in Whitehorse, Yukon: 2017

Catalogue no XIE. Income in Canada

New Brunswick Provincial Poverty Profile

February 22, Minimum Wage Review Committee Report

Existing Measures Working Paper No. 2 Informetrica Limited August 2009

Poverty After 50 in Canada: A Recent Snapshot

Post-Secondary Education, Training and Labour Prepared November New Brunswick Minimum Wage Report

FOCUS CCPA-NOVA SCOTIA. Cost of Poverty in Prince Edward Island 10 YEARS OF RAISING DEBATE AND PROPOSING POLICY ALTERNATIVES.

Report on the Administration of the Members of Parliament Retiring Allowances Act

2018/ /21 SERVICE PLAN

Social Assistance Summaries. Yukon Territory 2017

Measuring Suburban Poverty: Concepts and Data Sources Hofstra University September 26, 2013

Cost of the Nutritious Food Basket - Toronto 2008

Journal of Social and Political Sciences

Non-Insured Health Benefits Program. First Nations and Inuit Health Branch Annual Report 2015/2016

M E A S U R I N G S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T

Title 24: Housing and Urban Development

e-brief September 30, 2008

Social Assistance Summaries. Prince Edward Island 2017

Teaching Certificated Directors. Non-Teaching Certificated Directors. 1. Supplementary Health and Vision Coverage Summary Chart

TRISTAT RESOURCES. Defining Poverty and Determining the Number Poor Trends REPORT

Consumer Price Index. Highlights. Manitoba second highest among provinces. MBS Reports C o n s u m e r P r i c e I n d e x, M a r c h

A Living Wage for Regina. Methodology. By Paul Gingrich

Manion Magazine. Taxation of Private Group Health and Dental Plans in Canada. Inside This Issue

Monthly Expenses Worksheet

THE QUÉBEC ECONOMIC PLAN. March Disposable Income BUDGET More Money for Each Quebecer

BC CAMPAIGN 2000 WHAT IS CHILD POVERTY? FACT SHEET #1 November 24, 2005

Still STRUGGLING. to Make Ends Meet. A Report on Living Wages in Washington State. By Allyson Fredericksen

HEALTH PLANS. Canadian Health Insurance TAX GUIDE. The Medical Expense Tax Credit. December Life s brighter under the sun

January 12, Minimum Wage Review Committee Report

Financial Disclosure Statement of Plaintiff Defendant

Teaching Certificated Exempt Managers. 1. Supplementary Health and Vision Coverage Summary Chart

Budget 2016: Recommendations to the Department of Finance

The Poverty Prism: What Has Helped?

Superintendents. 1. Supplementary Health and Vision Coverage Summary Chart

A Living Wage for the Clayoquot Sound Biosphere Reserve Region

PUBLICATIONS. Volume 12:3 February 2019 MEASURING AND RESPONDING TO INCOME POVERTY. Ron Kneebone and Margarita Wilkins

GROWING PROSPERITY IN THE CAPITAL REGION

Chapter 20. Social Security. Introduction to Social Security. Reasons for Social Insurance. Chapter Structure

Contents. Application. INCOME TAX ACT Determination of an Individual s Residence Status

Like many other countries, Canada has a

# 17 ASSETS: Severance Pay, RRSP and RIF 8-2 # 18 NET WORTH CALCULATION 8-4 # 19 MONTHLY RETIREMENT INCOME 8-6 # 20 MONTHLY RETIREMENT EXPENSES 8-7

, ) ) AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STANDING ) OF VS. ) (Name) ), ) Defendant. )

Exiting Poverty: Does Sex Matter?

PERSONAL INCOME TAX MEASURES

Transcription:

Low Income ( Poverty ) Lines Low income lines are the most commonly used tool for defining and measuring poverty. They provide thresholds below which a household is considered to be living on low income. Low income lines can be constructed in different ways. There are currently three low-income lines calculated by the federal government: the Low Income Cut-Off (LICO), the Low Income Measure (LIM) and the Market Basket Measure (MBM). Each offers a somewhat different perspective on low income in Canada. (Note: Statistics Canada points out that these are not official poverty lines but measures of low income; LICO, for instance, indicates the point at which households are living in straitened circumstances. ) The following overview is derived (and partially excerpted) from Low Income Measurement in Canada, an overview of the three measures prepared by Statistics Canada, and Understanding the 2000 Low Income Statistics Based on the Market Basket Measure, a background document prepared by Human Resources Development Canada. Similarities and Differences The most basic difference between the measures is that LICO and LIM represent relative approaches to poverty and the MBM represents an absolute approach. LICO and LIM measure disparity of income, while the MBM measures ability to meet a set list of needs. In terms of methodology, the three lines have some basic similarities and also an important area of difference. All three measures use the economic family as the entity in which economic resources are shared. The economic family is defined as the group of persons living in the same household who are related by blood, marriage, common-law or adoption. So three-generation families are considered one economic family, but three unrelated persons sharing a dwelling as roommates would be considered to be three economic families. All three measures use income as the basis for defining the low-income population. While income is frequently used in this way, primarily due to data availability, alternative approaches to measurement of low income could use such other characteristics as expenditures, assets, stage of life (full-time student, parent with young children, retired) or a combination of these to assess whether a particular person or family is in low income. So the basic approach to defining low income is the same for each of the measures; i.e., a cutoff is determined and is compared to the income of an economic

family (derived as the sum of the income of each individual in the family). A family with income less than the cutoff is defined as being in low income; otherwise not. All persons within an economic family are assigned the low income characteristic of the family in which they live. The major area of difference lies with the way the lines define income. For the LICO and LIM, two different income measures are used: before-tax income and after-tax income. Before-tax income is the sum of income from employment (both paid and self employment), investment income, retirement income and income from government transfer programs. After-tax income is before-tax income with income taxes paid deducted. Statistics Canada highlights the use of after-tax income for low income measurement. There are several reasons for this. First, both income taxes and transfers are methods of income redistribution. The before-tax rates only partly reflect the entire redistributive impact of Canada s tax/transfer system, by including the effect of transfers but not the effect of income taxes. Second, since the purchase of necessities is made with after-tax dollars, it is logical to use people s after-tax income to draw conclusions about their overall economic wellbeing. The MBM takes this concept a step further by moving closer to a measure of disposable income. The MBM income measure is after-tax income with additional nondiscretionary expenditures deducted. (These additional deductions are: the personal portion of payroll taxes; other mandatory payroll deductions such as contributions to employer-sponsored pension plans, supplementary health plans and union dues; child support and alimony payments made to another household; out-of-pocket spending on child care; and noninsured but medically-prescribed health-related expenses such as dental and vision care, prescription drugs and aids for persons with disabilities.) Low Income Cut-Off (LICO) In the mid 1960s, research at Statistics Canada led to the development of the Low Income Cut-Offs (LICOs). These lines were developed to indicate an income threshold below which a family is likely to spend significantly more of its income on food, shelter and clothing than the average family. For instance, in 1992, the average family spent 44% of its total post-income tax income on food, clothing and footwear and shelter. Thus, the after-tax LICOs were set at the point in the income distribution where a family would spend 64% or more of its post-income tax income on these three categories of expenditure. The LICO thresholds therefore vary both by family size and by community size in recognition of the fact that shelter tends to cost more as the size of the community increases. However, geographical variations in the cost of transportation and other items do not enter into the calculation of these thresholds. Moreover, all communities of the 2

same size have the same low-income thresholds. (See chart below for the variation of lines according to family size and size of locality for 2000. Note: 2005 is the most recent year for which the LICOs have been calculated.) The LICOs thus answer the question: How many Canadians live in families spending a share of their total post-tax income on food, clothing and shelter twenty percentage points higher than average families of the same size living in communities of comparable size? Low Income Measure The other measure of low income generated by Statistics Canada, the Low Income Measures (LIMs) have been produced since 1991 (although the time series has been extended back). The LIM is a pure measure of relative low income. It is defined as half the median family income (adjusted for family size). LIMs are the most frequently used measure internationally, particularly when making comparisons between countries. The primary reason for its popularity is its simplicity of calculation. The after-tax LIM answers the question: How many Canadians have an after-tax income lower than 50% of the adjusted median income for all Canadian economic families in a given year? 3

Market Basket Measure The MBM was developed by Human Resources Development Canada in consultation with a Federal-Provincial-Territorial Working Group of officials on Social Development Research and Information. This work was initiated in 1997 when Federal, Provincial and Territorial Ministers responsible for Social Services raised concerns about the existing measures of low income and asked officials to explore whether a new tool could be developed to complement these measures in assessing lowincome trends for families with children. As its name implies, the Market Basket Measure is a goods and services rather than a relative indicator of low income. The MBM estimates the cost of a specific basket of goods and services for the year 2000 assuming that all items in the basket were entirely provided for out of the spending of the household. The market basket on which the MBM is based includes specified quantities and qualities of goods and services related to food, clothing and footwear, shelter, and transportation. It also contains other goods and services such as personal and household needs, furniture, telephone service and modest levels of reading, recreation and entertainment (e.g., newspaper and magazine subscriptions, fees to participate in recreational activities or sports, video rentals, tickets to local sports events). The MBM is thus a goods and services indicator of low income whose cost is calculated for a number of specific urban communities and community sizes across Canada. As such, it can be used to answer a question not addressed by either the LICOs or the LIM: How many people in Canada live in families which lack the disposable income to purchase the goods and services in the Market Basket within their community or community size? 4

A second feature of the MBM is that it is more sensitive than either the LICOs or the LIM to differences in living costs among different communities and community sizes across Canada. This is because the MBM thresholds vary with the cost of the goods and services in the basket, not only between community sizes, but between communities of similar size in different provinces. This sensitivity to geographical differences in living costs and the transparency of the goods and services in the MBM were the features sought in the development of this new tool to assess low income. Finally, the basic concept of low income underlying the MBM is being unable to purchase the goods and services in the Market Basket. This implies that the income to be compared to the thresholds should not be gross income, but a measure of the disposable income actually available to purchase these goods and services. As a result, the following deductions are made from total family money income before comparing it to the cost of the basket: out of pocket spending on child care out of pocket spending on non-insured health care costs recommended by a health professional such as prescription drugs, health insurance premiums, aids for persons with disabilities and dental and vision care personal income taxes and the personal portion of all payroll taxes such as Canada/Quebec Pension Plan contributions and Employment Insurance premiums alimony and child support payments made to another family all mandatory payroll deductions for employer-sponsored pension plans, union dues and employer-sponsored supplementary health care plans. All of these deductions represent income that is not available to purchase the goods and services in the basket. As can be seen, this is a much more stringent concept of disposable income than that used for either the LICOs (which make no deductions from total money income before comparing that income to the LICO thresholds) or the after-tax LIM (which deducts only income taxes paid before comparing adjusted postincome tax family income to the after- tax LIM thresholds). The tables below compare the MBM lines calculated for 2000 with the LICO (after tax and before tax) lines and the LIM (after tax) lines for the same year. 5

6

Reference: Applied Research Branch. (2003). Understanding the 2000 Low Income Statistics Based on the Market Basket Measure. Ottawa. Human Resources Development Canada. April. Giles, Philip. (2004). Low Income Measurement in Canada. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. 7