Ensuring result-orientation in Operational Programmes

Similar documents
Financial management: comparing and

Generating successful projects, developing and managing the project pipeline Trainer: Robin Smail Independent Consultant & Visiting Expert EIPA

Programming Period. European Social Fund

Revenue-generating projects, the Performance Framework, workshops

FICHE 4A. Version 1 4 April 2013

DRAFT TEMPLATE AND GUIDELINES FOR THE CONTENT

GUIDANCE FICHE PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK REVIEW AND RESERVE IN VERSION 1 9 APRIL 2013 RELEVANT PROVISIONS IN THE DRAFT LEGISLATION

Guidance for Member States on Performance framework, review and reserve

Guidance for Member States on Performance framework, review and reserve

HEADING 1B ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND TERRITORIAL COHESION

ESF PR 5.1. ESF Programme for Employability, Inclusion and Learning OP Technical Assistance. Technical Assistance for the ESF.

ESF PR 2.9. ESF Programme for Employability, Inclusion and Learning OP

Eligibility of expenditures in Structural Funds Trainer: Marco Lopriore, EIPA

Annual Implementation Report 2015

Evaluation of ESF. US-EU Exchange on workforce development programmes. Brussels, 04 September Barbara ROUBICEK, DG EMPL

Key elements of the Commission proposal for the future European Social Fund

ESI funds in compliance with State aid rules

Summary of the Partnership Agreement for Hungary,

Katarina Ivanković Knežević, Assistant Minister Ministry of Labour and Pension System, Republic of Croatia European Parliament, Bruxelles, 7 April

ESF Evaluation Partnership 17 November Key elements of the Commission proposal for the future ESF

EU Budget for the future ERDF/CF. June 2018 EVALNET. #CohesionPolicy #EUinmyRegion #ESIFOpendata

Mainstreaming of Horizontal Principles: art. 7-8 CPR. Peter Berkowitz ESIF SD - 17 November 2015

Evaluation and Monitoring of EU Structural and Cohesion Funds Programmes, Introduction. What is this course about?

DRAFT TEMPLATE AND GUIDELINES ON THE CONTENT PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT OF THE

European Union Regional Policy Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. EU Cohesion Policy Proposals from the European Commission

Madrid, 7 November 2013

Integrating Europe 2020 in European Territorial Cooperation programmes and projects in the new programming period

ESF Programme for Employment, Inclusion and Learning

Financial Instruments - Implementation in the EU and in Lithuania

Template for EMMF operational programme (CLLD elements) FARNET MA meeting, 25 March 2014

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. European Structural and Investment Funds. Guidance Note on

De minimis aid workshop

EU Cohesion Policy- ESF

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. on the European Social Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1081/2006

Synthesis Report of ESF 2016 Annual Implementation Reports

EU Funds investments and projections, preparation for the period December, 2014

EN Selection and monitoring for ERDF and ESF projects in the period are still mainly outputs-oriented.

ESF Certifying Authority, Department of Education and Skills Circular 1/2016 (replacing Circular 1/2015)

Tracking climate expenditure

Summary of the Partnership Agreement for Croatia,

YOUTH EMPLOYMENT INITIATIVE

MTR - Legislative changes affecting the ESI Funds

European Union Regional, Urban and Cooperation Policy: aims, methods and reform

Launch Event. INTERREG IPA CBC Croatia- Serbia

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

ANNEX. ANNEX II: Country fiches. to the. Communication from the Commission

CATEGORIES OF INTERVENTION. Fiche no 6. Brussels, 14 November Commission Proposals

The main objectives of the eu rural development policy for

PLANNING BUREAU SUMMARY. December 2009

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

ESF Certifying Authority, Department of Education and Skills Circular 1/2015

Annual Implementation Report 2017

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Committee on Regional Development

Development of a system of common indicators for European Regional Development Fund and Cohesion Fund interventions after 2020

Obecné nařízení Přílohy obecného nařízení Nařízení pro ERDF Nařízení o podpoře EÚS z ERDF Nařízení pro ESF Nařízení pro FS

European Funding Joy Holland West Midlands European Service

Programme for Employability Inclusion and Learning (PEIL) Financial Progress Report

ANNEX X Model for the implementation reports for the European territorial cooperation goal

The funding possibilities to build up adaptation capacities and take action

Financial Instruments DG Regional and Urban Policy Budapest 24th April 2015

Investing inregions and cities: EU Cohesion Policy Cohesion policy

EU Cohesion Policy : proposals from the EU Commission - research & innovation issues -

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

EU Cohesion Policy

The modifications highlighted in bold are those in comparison to the revised versions (corrigendum) presented by the Commission on 14 March 2012.

The urban dimension. in the legislative proposals for the future cohesion policy. Zsolt Szokolai DG REGIO C.2 Urban development, territorial cohesion

Programming Period

Training on EU policies for Directors of the Region of Sicily. Brussels Office of the Region of Sicily Rue Belliard 12

DRAFT GUIDANCE FICHE FOR DESK OFFICERS VERSION 3-28/01/2014 RELEVANT PROVISIONS IN THE LEGISLATION INTEGRATED TERRITORIAL INVESTMENT (ITI)

FICHE NO 25 APPLICABILITY OF FLAT RATES FOR FINANCING INDIRECT COSTS IN OTHER UNION POLICIES VERSION 1 22/10/2013. Version

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS, THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

The Programming Period Working Document No. 7. July 2009

Investing in regions: The reformed EU Cohesion Policy

FICHE 1B - DRAFT MODEL FOR THE COOPERATION PROGRAMME UNDER THE EUROPEAN TERRITORIAL

Urban Mobility within Sustainable Urban Development supported by the European Structural and Investment Funds

EU Cohesion Policy Proposals from the European Commission

Key features and opportunities of financial instruments under ESI Funds in

Major projects in the programming period

EN Ex ante conditionalities and performance reserve in Cohesion: innovative but not yet effective instruments.

Guidance on Simplified Cost Options (SCOs):

Rules on eligibility of expenditure

COHESION POLICY AND PARIS AGREEMENT TARGETS

FAQ ON EX ANTE CONDITIONALITIES RELATING TO TRANSPORT

COHESION POLICY

THE DIMENSIONS OF WELL BEING IN OECD REGIONS. CAGLIARI Terminal Crociere- Molo Ichnusa 26 to27 September 2013

Energy Efficiency in Buildings at the crossroad of European energy, cohesion and industrial policies

EU SIF Previous Briefing Session:

Welcome and Introduction

INTERACT III Draft Cooperation Programme

Fact Sheet; Errors, financial corrections, irregularities, recoveries and withdrawals

Programme Manual

Financial Instruments supported by the European Structural and Investment (ESI) Funds in CSI-Europe towards FIs for Cities

INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT

Reporting on financial instruments (FI) in the annual implementation report for the programming period

EU COMMON STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FUNDS IN ENGLAND INITIAL PROPOSALS FROM HMG NOVEMBER 2012

COHESION POLICY

Experience with financial instruments in the period of and the new framework for the period of

ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT. The URBACT II Programme YEAR Objective concerned: Objective 3: European Territorial Cooperation

EN Special Report

MARITIME AFFAIRS & FISHERIES. EMFF Strategic Programming

Transcription:

Ensuring result-orientation in Operational Programmes 2014-2020 16-17 February 2016 learning and development - consultancy - research EIPA

Structure of seminar Day 1: Intervention logic / result-orientation Generating and selecting good projects Day 2: Monitoring and reporting Evaluation Plans and evaluations

Intervention logic, specific objectives and result-orientation in 2014-2020 Trainer: Robin Smail Independent Consultant & Visiting Expert EIPA This training has been organised by EIPA-Ecorys-PwC under the Framework Contract Nr 2013.CE.16 B.AT 044. The opinions expressed are those of the contractor only and do not

Partnership agreement

OP CSF Fund Thematic objective (ex ante conditionality shown) OP1: Competitiveness through innovation and company growth ERDF RTD and Innovation Priority axis priority axis 1 ICT Priority axis 2 SME support Priority axis 3 Priority axis 4 Investment priorities Investment priority 1 Investment priority 2 Specific objectives for investment priorities Specific objective 1 Specific objective 2 Specific objective 1 Operations (Activities) Interventions Actions, contributing to objective Actions Actions indicators Common and Programme- specific RESULTS for SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES with BASELINE and TARGETS OUTPUTS OF OPERATIONS with TARGETS Structure of Programmes and resultorientation an intervention logic OP2: infrastructure ERDF Sustainable transport Roads Rail Ports and waterways CF Low carbon economy Energy OP3: Human Resources ESF Promoting employment Priority axis 1 Priority axis 2 Social inclusion Priority axis 3 Promoting employment ERDF Promoting employment Priority axis 4

Intervention Logic for Each Priority Axis Thematic objectives + Investment priorities Specific objectives what the MS wants to achieve, taking into account national and regional challenges, needs and potentials Result indicators Description of actions needed to achieve the specific objectives Categories of intervention Output Indicators

Operational Programmes Justify choice of thematic objectives, investment priorities and financial allocations... on the basis of regional/national needs and challenges of CSRs... expected results for the specific objectives... type of action under each investment priority and expected contribution to specific objectives... guiding principles for the selection of operations Article 96, Common Provisions Regulation

Investment priorities will have specific objectives, measured in terms of results to be achieved... (Article 96, CPR) Priority Axis 1 (thematic objective) Investment priority 1 Investment priority 2 Specific objective 1 RESULT RESULT (baseline and target) Specific objective 2 RESULT Specific objective 1 RESULT RESULT Type of action / operation and example; target groups? Territory? Type of beneficiary OUTPUTS

Performance framework uses outputs... Priority Indicators (and unit of measurement) Milestones for 2018 Targets for 2023 ERDF: P1 Spend ( )* Output eg. no. new companies assisted Stage of project / initiative Financial; Output; Key implementation step Financial; Output; (Result) P2 P3 Priority Indicators Milestones 2018 Targets 2023 ESF: P1 Spend ( )* Output eg. no. of trainees (by age group etc.) Result - eg. no. with jobs; no. active in labour market Financial; Output; Result Financial; Output; Result P2 (NB: *Spend = total certified eligible expenditure)

indicators for programmes, 2014-2020 OUTPUT measures units of activity of an operation goods or services purchased by expenditure first concrete effect of expenditure ----------------- Examples: No. of training courses No. of participants Km of road No. of companies assisted RESULT measures the change sought by the specific objective measures the ability to achieve the specific objective the knock-on effect, enabled by outputs ------------------ Examples: no. of course completions with qualifications no. active in labour market no. into employment travel time-saved accident rates No. of companies expanding into new markets No. of new company-research links

indicators in 2007-2013 PROGRAMME indicators: impact = intermediate and final result = results OR outcomes output = outputs resource / financial = expenditure BASELINE is starting point situation* TARGETS reflected your objectives EU list of core indicators (see SFC2007), for aggregation of different operations and activity groups

2014-2020: orientation towards results ü output indicators ü result indicators X dropping impact indicators ü core indicators replaced by COMMON indicators (listed on SFC2014) ü require quantified targets

2014-2020: orientation towards results indicators need a baseline (starting) value for ERDF / CF / ESF; for ESF, it may be a reference value based on previous experience / studies* baseline for outputs=0 set targets for outputs and results ERDF/Cohesion Fund: COMMON indicators are all defined as output indicators... ESF: COMMON indicators are output and result indicators - outputs are basic information on participants; & number of projects - results are achievements (immediate and longer-term)

ESF Common and programme specific indicators, 2014-2020 OUTPUTS ESF participants: unemployed? inactive? age? education? migrant? disabled? Numbers of projects (by social partners etc.) Number of enterprises supported (eg. social economy) Numbers of trainees from target group Numbers of curricula developed Numbers of new job and vacancy sites RESULTS Immediate: active/ training / qualified/ employed on leaving/ disadvantaged, and as above YEI: as above, after completing YEI supported intervention Longer-term: employed 6 months later etc.; as above, older/ disadvantaged YEI: as above Numbers gaining qualifications Number of curricula introduced

ESF Common indicators, 2014-2020 Annex I (1) Output indicators on participants employment status, age, education, disadvantage (2) Output indicators on entities types of projects, by sponsor, target group; enterprises supported -------------------------------------------------------------------------- (3) Immediate result indicators upon leaving - becoming active, into education or training, in work (disadvantaged?) (4) Longer-term result indicators 6 months after leaving in work (over 54, disadvantaged?) Annex II : YEI indicators (1) Immediate result indicators unemployed, LTU, inactive completing; offer, education or training, in work upon leaving (2) Longer-term result indicators 6 months after leaving in work or education and training

ERDF Common and programme specific indicators, 2014-2020 OUTPUTS no. of projects; no. of companies assisted; no. of companies cooperating.. matching private investment ( m) km of new or upgraded road or railway line/tram/canal waste recycling capacity (tonnes); energy generation capacity (MW); m² provided/renovated; hectares prepared land; households connected/ population benefitting capacity of infrastructure for services (persons) employment in supported enterprises FTE/Researcher posts in enterprises supported Tourist visits to supported projects Reduction of energy consumption or greenhouse gases RESULTS jobs created in SMEs freight carried; passenger trips no. of new products introduced to market no. of tourist visits to area/region travel time saved, accident rates companies accomodated energy intensity in sector use of e-business / e-health services / new products exported new business survival rates (2 yrs) utilisation rates / productivity investment in region / sector

Cohesion Fund Common and programme specific indicators, 2014-2020 OUTPUTS km of new or upgraded road or railway line/tram/canal waste recycling capacity (tons); renewable energy generation capacity (MW); hectares prepared land Population /additional population or households connected or linked to service or benefiting from investment; additional users Reduction of energy consumption or greenhouse gases RESULTS freight carried; passenger trips travel time saved, accident rates energy intensity in sector cleanliness of beaches or water courses

Indicators listed in Operational Programmes ü RESULT indicators (with ID numbers) for each Specific Objective, by Investment Priority ü OUTPUT indicators (with ID numbers), by Investment Priority ü Plus Performance Framework Indicators (with ID numbers) (by priority axis) Implementing Regulation 288/2014, Annex I, Tables 3 to 6

Categorisation of interventions Data collection & maintenance ü CATEGORIES of INTERVENTION codes in tables relating to field, financing, territory, theme etc. (Implementing Reg. 215/2014, Annex I) ü Monitoring system project data for all OPERATIONS (Art.125.2(d), CPR and Annex III of Delegated Reg. 480/2014, 3.3.2014), including the categories of intervention as above ü data on ESF PARTICIPANTS (as above, and Annexes of ESF Reg.)

Performance Framework and performance review

Performance framework uses outputs... Priority Indicators (and unit of measurement) Milestones for 2018 Targets for 2023 ERDF: P1 Spend ( )* Output eg. no. new companies assisted Stage of project / initiative Financial; Output; Key implementation step Financial; Output; (Result) P2 P3 Priority Indicators Milestones 2018 Targets 2023 ESF: P1 Spend ( )* Output eg. no. of trainees (by age group etc.) Result - eg. no. with jobs; no. active in labour market Financial; Output; Result Financial; Output; Result P2 (NB: *Spend = total certified eligible expenditure)

Performance framework measuring progress and success indicators where 1 or 2 indicators per priority, all must reach 85% of milestone or target where more than 2 indicators per priority, all but one must reach 85% (the other must reach 75%) measuring progress and serious failure indicators where 1 or 2 indicators per priority, where either fails to reach 65% of milestone or target where more than 2 indicators per priority, at least 2 do not reach 65% of milestone or target 18

Priority Indicators (choose unit of measurement ) Success Serious Failure Final (2023) Achievement/ Absorption Coefficient Correction scale (on final values) P1 1 or 2 indicators used Financial (F) Output (Q) Result (R) P2 More than 2 indicators used Note: Financial (F) Output (Q) Result (R) Key Implementation step (K) Q and R and K correspond to more than 50% All indicators reach 85% of milestone or target All indicators reach 85% of milestone or target OR all but one reach 85%, 75% for the other By priority, assessed for each Fund, any indicator does not reach 65% of milestone or target 2 indicators do not reach 65% of milestone or target YEI assessed separately Calculate average achievement rate (A) of both indicators Divide by S (absorption rate of ) Average achievement rate (A) of all indicators Divide by S (absorption rate of ) A and S are both = final value / target 60-65%: Flat 5% financial correction to priority contribution 50-60%: Flat 10% financial correction Below 50%: Flat rate 25% financial correction Correction rates can be reduced 23 by up to 50%