Who, if Anyone, Reacts to Accrual Information? Robert H. Battalio, Notre Dame Alina Lerman, NYU Joshua Livnat, NYU Richard R. Mendenhall, Notre Dame

Similar documents
Post-Earnings-Announcement Drift (PEAD): The Role of Revenue Surprises

The High-Volume Return Premium and Post-Earnings Announcement Drift*

Post-Earnings-Announcement Drift: The Role of Revenue Surprises and Earnings Persistence

Do Investors Fully Understand the Implications of the Persistence of Revenue and Expense Surprises for Future Prices?

The Economic Consequences of (not) Issuing Preliminary Earnings Announcement

Internet Appendix to The Evolution of Financial Market Efficiency: Evidence from Earnings Announcements

Current Research Agenda

CFA Institute. CFA Institute is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Financial Analysts Journal.

The Post Earnings Announcement Drift, Market Reactions to SEC Filings and the Information Environment

Post-Earnings Announcement Drift: Timing and Liquidity Costs*

Do individual investors drive post-earnings announcement drift? Direct evidence from personal trades

Earnings Revisions in SEC Filings from Prior Preliminary Announcements

Investor Trading and the Post-Earnings-Announcement Drift

DETERMINING THE EFFECT OF POST-EARNINGS-ANNOUNCEMENT DRIFT ON VARYING DEGREES OF EARNINGS SURPRISE MAGNITUDE TOM SCHNEIDER ( ) Abstract

Accruals and Value/Glamour Anomalies: The Same or Related Phenomena?

FTS Real Time Project: Forecasting Quarterly Earnings and Post Earnings Announcement Drift (PEAD)

Core CFO and Future Performance. Abstract

Post-Earnings Announcement Drift: The Role of Earnings Volatility

Trading Behavior around Earnings Announcements

Investor Trading and Book-Tax Differences

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and

Gross Profit Surprises and Future Stock Returns. Peng-Chia Chiu The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Aggregate Earnings Surprises, & Behavioral Finance

Yale ICF Working Paper No March 2003

Price, Earnings, and Revenue Momentum Strategies

A Multifactor Explanation of Post-Earnings Announcement Drift

Stock Returns, Aggregate Earnings Surprises, and Behavioral Finance

Investors Opinion Divergence and Post-Earnings Announcement Drift in REITs

Conditional Persistence of Earnings Components and Accounting Anomalies

Investor Sophistication and the Mispricing of Accruals

ACCRUALS MANAGEMENT, INVESTOR SOPHISTICATION, AND EQUITY VALUATION: EVIDENCE FROM 10-Q FILINGS

DISCRETIONARY DELETIONS FROM THE S&P 500 INDEX: EVIDENCE ON FORECASTED AND REALIZED EARNINGS Stoyu I. Ivanov, San Jose State University

Recency Bias and Post-Earnings Announcement Drift * Qingzhong Ma California State University, Chico. David A. Whidbee Washington State University

Information in Order Backlog: Change versus Level. Li Gu Zhiqiang Wang Jianming Ye Fordham University Xiamen University Baruch College.

Implications of Transaction Costs for the Post-Earnings-Announcement. Drift

THE ROLE OF EARNINGS VOLATILITY SOURCES IN FORECASTING

Evaluating the accrual-fixation hypothesis as an explanation for the accrual anomaly

The Information Content of Fiscal-Year-End Earnings

Seasonal Analysis of Abnormal Returns after Quarterly Earnings Announcements

Stock Returns, Aggregate Earnings Surprises, and Behavioral Finance

Online Appendix Results using Quarterly Earnings and Long-Term Growth Forecasts

Effects of Growth Options on Post-Earnings Announcement Drift

Earnings Announcements are Full of Surprises. Michael W. Brandt a Runeet Kishore b Pedro Santa-Clara c Mohan Venkatachalam d

Post-Earnings-Announcement Drift Among Newly Issued Public Companies in U.S. Capital Markets

What Drives the Earnings Announcement Premium?

Post-Earnings Announcement Drift in Denmark

Earnings Announcement Idiosyncratic Volatility and the Crosssection

Why Returns on Earnings Announcement Days are More Informative than Other Days

IS CONDITIONAL PERSISTENCE FULLY PRICED? Eli Amir* Itay Kama** Working Paper No 13/2011 July Research No

Liquidity and the Post-Earnings-Announcement Drift

Pricing and Mispricing in the Cross Section

Caught on Tape: Institutional Trading, Stock Returns, and Earnings Announcements

A Synthesis of Accrual Quality and Abnormal Accrual Models: An Empirical Implementation

Investor Clienteles and Asset Pricing Anomalies *

Online Appendix to. The Value of Crowdsourced Earnings Forecasts

Evidence That Management Earnings Forecasts Do Not Fully Incorporate Information in Prior Forecast Errors

Individual Investor Trading and Return Patterns around Earnings Announcements

Do short sellers target firms with poor earnings quality? evidence from earnings restatements

WORKING PAPER SERIES

The Journal of Applied Business Research March/April 2015 Volume 31, Number 2

Economics of Behavioral Finance. Lecture 3

Accruals, Heterogeneous Beliefs, and Stock Returns

The Mispricing of Loan Loss Provisions

A Replication Study of Ball and Brown (1968): Comparative Analysis of China and the US *

ALTERNATIVE MOMENTUM STRATEGIES. Faculdade de Economia da Universidade do Porto Rua Dr. Roberto Frias Porto Portugal

The Impact of Analysts Forecast Errors and Forecast Revisions on Stock Prices

Journal Of Financial And Strategic Decisions Volume 10 Number 2 Summer 1997 AN ANALYSIS OF VALUE LINE S ABILITY TO FORECAST LONG-RUN RETURNS

The predictive power of investment and accruals

Style-Driven Earnings Momentum

The Persistence and Pricing of the Cash Component of Earnings

Institutional Ownership and Return Predictability Across Economically Unrelated Stocks Internet Appendix: Robustness Checks

Geographic Diffusion of Information and Stock Returns

Analysts and Anomalies ψ

Market Efficiency FINANCE 352 INVESTMENTS. Professor Alon Brav. Fuqua School of Business Duke University

The Effect of Ex-Ante Management Forecast Accuracy on Post- Earnings Announcement Drift

Value-Glamour and Accruals Mispricing: One Anomaly or Two?

Conflict in Whispers and Analyst Forecasts: Which One Should Be Your Guide?

Expected Earnings and the Post-Earnings-Announcement Drift

IMPACT OF RESTATEMENT OF EARNINGS ON TRADING METRICS. Duong Nguyen*, Shahid S. Hamid**, Suchi Mishra**, Arun Prakash**

Underreaction to Industry-Wide Earnings and the Post-Forecast Revision Drift

Post-Earnings Announcement Drift and Market Participants' Information Processing Biases

Accounting Conservatism and the Relation Between Returns and Accounting Data

Identifying Skilled Mutual Fund Managers by their Ability to Forecast Earnings

Are Trade Size-Based Inferences About Traders Reliable? Evidence from Institutional Earnings-Related Trading

A Test of the Errors-in-Expectations Explanation of the Value/Glamour Stock Returns Performance: Evidence from Analysts Forecasts

Change in systematic trading behavior and the cross-section of stock returns during the global financial crisis: Fear or Greed?

A Comparison of the Results in Barber, Odean, and Zhu (2006) and Hvidkjaer (2006)

ARTICLE IN PRESS. Value Line and I/B/E/S earnings forecasts

Testing the q-theory of Anomalies

Properties of implied cost of capital using analysts forecasts

Year wise share price response to Annual Earnings Announcements

Investor Trading and Return Patterns around Earnings Announcements

The effect of mutual fund investment style on the accrual and book-to-market anomalies

Informed versus Uninformed Investors: Internet Searches, Options Trading, and Post-Earnings Announcement Drift

Is Information Risk Priced for NASDAQ-listed Stocks?

MARKET EFFICIENCY, SHORT SALES AND ANNOUNCEMENT EFFECTS. A Dissertation. Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School. of Cornell University

Post earnings announcement drift in Sweden - evidence and application of theories in Behavioral Finance

Does the Stock Market Fully Appreciate the Implications of Leading Indicators for Future Earnings? Evidence from Order Backlog

Online Appendix - Does Inventory Productivity Predict Future Stock Returns? A Retailing Industry Perspective

Do Retail Trades Move Markets? Brad Barber Terrance Odean Ning Zhu

Transcription:

Who, if Anyone, Reacts to Accrual Information? Robert H. Battalio, Notre Dame Alina Lerman, NYU Joshua Livnat, NYU Richard R. Mendenhall, Notre Dame 1

Overview Objectives: Can accruals add information beyond earnings? Is investors net buying behavior consistent with accrual information? 2

Overview (Continued) Methodology: Extension of Collins and Hribar (2000) Only firms covered by analysts Exact SEC filing dates Elimination of firms that disclose net operating cash flow in their preliminary earnings announcements Trading behavior of small and large traders around SEC filings Is large traders net buying behavior around SEC filings consistent with accrual information? 3

Overview (Continued) Results: Trading on accruals is incrementally profitable to trading on earnings surprises. A strategy that takes positions according to extreme earnings surprises and unwinds them when accruals provide conflicting signals is even more profitable. Large traders seem to trade according to the accrual signal around SEC filings, but only when the initial earnings surprise is non-negative. Small traders seem to trade contrary to the accrual signal. 4

Data Acknowledgements Charter Oak Investment Systems Inc. for providing the preliminary and original Compustat quarterly data. http://www.charteroaksystems.com/ S&P s Compustat for SEC filing dates. Thomson Financial for providing earnings forecasts available through the Institutional Brokers Estimate System. 5

Definitions Accruals = Net Income Net Operating Cash Flow. Represents investments in net current assets (such as inventories and receivables), as well as adjustments for accounting items that are not cash items (such as depreciation and deferred taxes). Accruals are typically negative; net income is after depreciation whereas net operating cash flow is not. 6

Intuition Investors are fixated on earnings. Managers can affect earnings by increasing accruals (thus, leading to higher earnings), or decreasing accruals (lower earnings). Accruals tend to reverse the game can last for a limited time. When accruals reverse, earnings are affected in the opposite way. 7

Sloan (1996) Accrual Anomaly 1-Year Return 0.06 0.04 0.02 0-0.02-0.04-0.06 Lowest 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Highest Accrual Decile 8

Sloan (1996) Accrual Anomaly Only two years of negative returns. Probably not driven by additional risk. 9

Sloan (1996) Accrual Anomaly Earnings Announcement Returns Window is (-2,0) Sum of four quarterly announcements 10

Foster, Olsen & Shevlin (1984) PEAD 11

Bernard & Thomas (1989) PEAD 12

Bernard & Thomas (1990) PEAD Announcement date of subsequent quarter, relative to announcement of quarter 13t

Collins & Hribar (2000) PEAD 14

Collins & Hribar (2000) Accruals 15

Collins & Hribar (2000) Combining PEAD and Accruals You can improve on PEAD (long position in SUE5) by selecting the subset with low accruals (ACC1). It reduces the number of firm-quarters considerably (7,987 to 1705), but yields a much greater abnormal return. 16

Institutional Considerations Quarter End Preliminary 27 days 17 days Earnings SEC Filing Most firms announce preliminary earnings after quarter-end, but do not disclose net operating cash flow in this announcement. Firms then file their 10-Q/10-K Forms with the SEC, which include net operating cash flows. Easton and Zmijewski (1993) and Griffin (2003) show that most firms file on the last day or two of the allowed period. 17

Research Design Issues Earnings are typically known before accruals. Most firms disclose accruals only in their SEC filings. SEC filing dates are not in the Compustat database. Bartov et al (2000) show that firms with high levels of institutional investors have lower drift. Collins et al (2003) show similar results for accruals. Which firms should be studied? 18

Collins and Hribar (2000) Assume accruals become known 17 days after the preliminary earnings announcement. In our sample, accruals become known within 17 days after the preliminary earnings for only about 26% of the observations. Use a time-series forecast for earnings surprises. The drift is smaller for firms covered by analysts when timeseries forecasts are used instead of analyst forecasts (Livnat and Mendenhall, 2006). Use a holding period of two quarters. 19

Our Research Design Precise SEC filing dates. Only firms covered by analysts. Only firms with at least 3 days between preliminary earnings announcements and SEC filings. Limited to firms that did not disclose net operating cash flow in the preliminary earnings announcement. 20

Advantages Can examine accruals as a separate signal from earnings. Focus on firms which are more likely to be held by professional investors. Can assess whether accrual information is used by traders when it is disclosed. 21

Two-Stage Study Show that accruals are value-relevant after earnings are known. Trading gains when using accruals in addition to earnings: Replicating and extending Collins and Hribar (2000). Showing that unwinding extreme earnings positions in light of conflicting accrual signals can yield even greater trading gains. Examine the net buying behavior of small and large traders when accruals become known. Battalio and Mendenhall (2005) show that small traders react to earnings surprises based on seasonal random walk forecasts, whereas large traders to those based on analyst forecasts. 22

Sample Selection Preliminary earnings announcement date at least three days prior to the SEC filing date. Net operating cash flow not disclosed in the preliminary earnings announcement. At least one forecast on I/B/E/S for quarterly earnings during the 90-day period prior to the preliminary earnings announcement. Market value and average total assets of at least $1 million. Availability of data to calculate earnings surprises. 23

Earnings Surprises Time-Series: (using prior 8 quarters of adjusted EPS) SUE jt, = E δ jt, jt, jt, 4 STD jt, E Analyst Forecasts: SUEAF jt, = E ibes jt, jt, P jt, F 24

Accruals and Abnormal Returns Accruals as in Collins and Hribar (2000): Quarterly net income before extraordinary items minus quarterly net operating cash flow, scaled by average total assets during the quarter. Buy & Hold Returns (BHR) minus BHR on the Fama and French portfolio with similar size and B/M (6 groups). From 2 days after an information event date (preliminary earnings or SEC filing) through one day after the next quarter s preliminary earnings. 25

Average Quarterly B&H Excess Returns 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Earnings- Based Prelim to Prelim Earnings- Based SEC Filing to Prelim Accruals- Based SEC Filing to Prelim Combined Earnings and Accruals Short Long Hedge Reversing Based on Table 2 26

Conclusions from Market Tests The accrual anomaly persists incrementally to the SUEAF strategy for firms followed by analysts and using precise SEC filing dates. One can improve trading gains by using the SUEAF strategy as of the preliminary earnings announcement and then unwinding positions if accruals exhibit conflicting signals. 27

Net Buying Behavior Use the Lee and Ready (1991) algorithm to classify trades obtained from the NYSE's TAQ database as buyer- or seller-initiated trades. If the transaction price is above (below) the midpoint of the execution-time bid and offer it is classified as buyer- (seller-) initiated. Compute the number of buy and sell transactions in a 3-day window centered on an event date for six bin sizes, ranging from less than 500 shares (small traders) through more than 5,000 shares (large traders). 28

Net Buying Behavior (Cont.) Compare the event date net buying behavior in a particular size bin to the average of net buying behavior in two 3-day windows before and after the event period. The measure is scaled: NetBuy Event = 1 NetEventBuy ( NetPreBuy + NetPostBuy ) 2 Avg.# of Non - Event Trades 29

Net Buying Behavior (Cont.) NetPreBuy: 3-day window centered on the 20 th day before the preliminary earnings announcement date. NetPostBuy: 3-day window centered on the 20 th day after the SEC filing date. A minimum of 10 trades is required for each 3-day period in the study (pre, earnings, SEC filing, and post). 30

Preliminary Earnings Announcement Correlations Between Net Buying and Earnings Surprises 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 dsueaf dsue <500 sh 500 sh 600-900 sh 1000 sh 1100-4900 sh 5000 sh 1 2 3 4 5 6 Net buying behavior of small (large) traders is more closely associated with SUE (SUEAF). Table 4 31

SEC Filing Date Correlation Between Net Buying Behavior and Accruals 0.04 0.02 0-0.02 1 2 3 4 5 6-0.04 All Meet or Beat by $0.01 Earnings Surprise > 0 Earnings Surprise < 0 Net buying behavior of large (small) traders is Consistent (inconsistent) with accruals. Table 5 32

All Observations Mean Net Buying for Extreme Accruals 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0-0.01-0.02-0.03-0.04 Highest Accrual 1 6 Lowest Accrual Small traders buy significantly more when accruals are high. Large traders sell more when accruals are high. Table 6 (Panel A) 33

Positive Preliminary Earnings Surprise Mean Net Buying for Extreme Accruals 0.06 0.04 0.02 0-0.02-0.04-0.06 Highest Accrual 1 6 Lowest Accrual Small traders buy significantly more when accruals are high. Large traders sell significantly more when accruals are high. Table 6 (Panel B) 34

Net Buying SEC filing F-M Regression NetBuy 1 NetBuy 1 NetBuy 1 NetBuy 6 NetBuy 6 NetBuy 6 dsue 0.017-0.004 0.008-0.024 0.027 0.763 0.561 0.393 dsueaf -0.043 0.062 0.078 0.081 0.002 0.008 0.023 0.020 dacc 0.025 0.007 0.008-0.050 0.017 0.021 0.001 0.576 0.531 0.060 0.650 0.567 POS 0.017 0.017-0.014-0.011 0.092 0.093 0.563 0.679 dacc*pos 0.040 0.040-0.113-0.114 0.024 0.024 0.010 0.009 Table 7 35

Economic Interpretation Consider two stocks with SUEAF>0, with 50 large buys and 50 large sells in the non-event windows (100 non-event trades, net non-event buy is 0). Stock A: extreme low accruals which induced 5 additional buys: Stock B: extreme high accruals which induced 5 additional sales: +5-0 NetBuy( Low _ Accrual ) = = +0.05 100-5 -0 NetBuy( High _ Accrual ) = = -0.05 100 Then the coefficient on dacc*pos in the regression is -0.100. We observed -0.113. 36

Conclusions from Net Buying Small traders seem to behave contrary to the accrual signal around the SEC filing date. Large traders seem to behave according to the accrual signal around the SEC filing date. However, large traders seem to behave according to the accrual signal only when preliminary earnings surprises are positive. They seem to ignore the accrual signal when the preliminary earnings surprise is negative. 37

Takeaways Accruals are incrementally informative to earnings and can be actively used to obtain abnormal returns. Large traders seem to trade according to the accrual signal around SEC filing dates. Small traders seem to trade against the accrual signal. Investors seem to react differently to accruals depending on the preliminary earnings surprise. 38