Third party risk management: Friend or foe?

Similar documents
BITS KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR MANAGING SUBCONTRACTORS

CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT GUIDANCE FOR HOME EQUITY LENDING

CU PolicyPro Policy Guidance. March 2018

By David F. Katz, Richard D. Smith, Elizabeth K. Hinson, Jason Mark Anderman and Sarah Statz

NACHA Third-Party Sender Certification Program Criteria

Office of Material Loss Reviews Report No. MLR Material Loss Review of Great Basin Bank of Nevada, Elko, Nevada

Prudential Regulators Should Apply Safety and Soundness Standards to Bank Payday Loan Products

Securitization. Management exercises authority that should rest with the board or engages in activities that expose the institution to excessive risk.

Practical Tips for Vendor Management

CFPB Consumer Laws and Regulation

The Compliance Challenges of Credit Union Collections. Collections and Compliance?

Assessing Credit Risk

Best Practices in Vendor Management Mortgage Servicer and Subservicer Oversight. Scott D. Samlin, Partner

by: Stephen King, JD, AMLP

DRAFT SOUND COMMERCIAL PRACTICES GUIDELINE

Consumer Compliance Hot Topics

Large Bank Supervision

Regulatory Update NAFCU Webcast

Securities and Derivatives Examination Procedures

CSI S QUARTERLY COMPLIANCE UPDATE

BERMUDA INSURANCE (GROUP SUPERVISION) RULES 2011 BR 76 / 2011

GUIDELINE ON OUTSOURCING

ANNEX B Illustrative U.S. Bank Regulatory Driven Board or Board Committee Review and Approval Items

Risk Review Committee Charter

CITIGROUP INC. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER As of March 21, 2012

OCC Policy Statement on Tax Refund-Related Products

Telemarketing Sales Rule Policy Manual Table of Contents [Sample Client] Table of Contents

Foreign Vendor Due Diligence: Ensuring Banks Perform Sufficient Due Diligence When Contracting with Foreign Vendors

Consumer Financial Protection by Federal Agencies

National Association of Federal Credit Unions Fair Lending Training (Part II)

Managing Third Party Risk in the ACH Network

Prudential Standard GOI 3 Risk Management and Internal Controls for Insurers

COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT: THE ART OF BOARD REPORTING

Setting Policies at the Board Level Agenda

How to Ace Your CFPB Exam

The COSO Control Framework and AML Risk Assessment. FIBA AML Conference Miami

Retirement Plan Services

Managing Fair and Responsible Lending Challenges and Risks

Title Insurance and Settlement Company Best Practices

BERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY THE INSURANCE CODE OF CONDUCT FEBRUARY 2010

EMERGING CONSUMER RISKS FOR COMMUNITY BANKS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY CONSENT ORDER

Bank-Owned Life Insurance Interagency Statement on the Purchase and Risk Management of Life Insurance

Financial Literacy Mastery

CU PolicyPro Alphabetical Policy Listing

Supervisory Highlights

THE BERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY BANKS AND DEPOSIT COMPANIES ACT 1999: The Management of Operational Risk

Compliance Perspectives

Truth in Savings Advertising Requirements Impacting Social Media

FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

U.S. Consumer Financial Services Regulation: What to Expect in 2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY CONSENT ORDER

Complaint Management. Leah M. Hamilton, Chief Compliance Officer. Compliance Services Temenos USA. All rights reserved.

Road Map To CFPB Compliance For The Auto Finance Industry

The Funnel Effect of The Dodd-Frank Act

Table of Contents. Sample

Regulatory Practice Letter January 2014 RPL 14-02

AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

MISSION VALUES. This Framework has been printed by:

OCC Asset Management Update. FIRMA Annual Risk Management Training Conference April 29, 2014

Lifecycle. html

V. Lending Overdraft Payment Programs. Overdraft Payment Programs V Introduction

RISK MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES JONATHAN FOXX *

LENDING: KEY EXAMINER TRENDS

BCB Bancorp, Inc. Audit Committee Charter

Nevada Assembly Commerce and Labor

UDAP Analysis, Examinations, Case Studies, and Emerging Risks

Compliance Risk Assessments Chicago Region Banker Workshop Series

CFPB Compliance Bulletin Date: July 31, 2017

Incentive Compensation for Financial Institutions: Reproposal and Its Impact on Regional Banks

FINANCIAL INSTITUTION GOVERNANCE AND REGULATION SERVICES EXPERTS WITH IMPACT

New Products and Business Initiatives. 27th National Risk Management Training Conference

GUIDELINES ON COMPLIANCE FUNCTION FOR FUND MANAGEMENT COMPANIES

Identity Theft Prevention: The FTC s Red Flags Rules and Health Care Providers HCCA Physician Practice Compliance Conference October 13, 2009

Short-Term, Small-Dollar Lending

Your Risk Management Toolkit. Kevin Larson, Chief Compliance Officer, Cetera Investment Services

Regulatory Practice Letter December 2014 RPL 14-22

STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS. S.I. No. 60 of 2017 CENTRAL BANK (SUPERVISION AND ENFORCEMENT) ACT 2013 (SECTION 48(1)) (INVESTMENT FIRMS) REGULATIONS 2017

Provide reports and minutes of meetings to the board.

IV.1 Policy Paper Corporate Governance for Captive Insurance Companies

Re: Request for Information on Small-Dollar Lending (Docket No. FDIC ; RIN ZA04)

BULLETIN. DESKTOP UNDERWRITER SCHEDULE (Non-Seller/Servicer (DU Only) Version)

A SURVEY OF UNFAIR, DECEPTIVE, AND ABUSIVE PRACTICES ADAM D. MAAREC SEPTEMBER 10, 2014

INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY

FINRA Regulation of Broker-Dealer Due Diligence in Regulation D Offerings

2017 WEBINAR SCHEDULE Affordable training, when and where you choose

SOLVENCY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT EUROLIFE LTD

STATE UNIVERSITIES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ILLINOIS SELF-MANAGED PLAN INVESTMENT POLICY

BY-LAW N O. 5 BY-LAW RESPECTING STANDARDS OF SOUND BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL PRACTICES. Assessment Workbook: Management

Examining Reverse Mortgage Activities. National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association November 3, 2010

Automobile Insurance Market Conduct Assessment Report. Part 1: Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule Part 2: Rating and Underwriting Process

Regulatory and Enforcement Trends

Trendspotting the CFPB: What s Coming and How Institutions Can Prepare

Kush Bottles, Inc. A Nevada corporation (the Company )

STATE UNIVERSITIES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ILLINOIS SELF-MANAGED PLAN INVESTMENT POLICY

FIRMA Nashville Tennessee April 21, 2015

DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION OF ONTARIO BY-LAW NO. 5 STANDARDS OF SOUND BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL PRACTICES

THE DIRECTOR S BOOK. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

SHAW COMMUNICATIONS INC. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

M-IA. Comptroller of the Currency Administrator of National Banks. Insider Activities. Comptroller s Handbook. March 2006.

Transcription:

Third party risk management: Friend or foe? Leah M. Hamilton, Chief Compliance Officer 1 2016 Temenos USA. All rights reserved.

What You Will Learn: Vendor Management Why use? Potential risks Compliance management Risk assessment Due diligence Contract structuring and review Board and management oversight 2

Vendor Management Why use third parties? Attain strategic objectives Increasing revenues Reduce costs Access greater expertise or efficiency Enhance competitiveness Provide diversification Strengthen the safety and soundness CMS 3

Vendor Management Challenges posed Still responsible for activity performed to same extent as if performed by the institution Expectation to have a clearly defined system of risk management controls built into CMS, S/S, and IT management systems governing compliance operations, including controls over activities conducted by affiliates and third party vendors Identify and control risks arising from such relationships Does not relinquish responsibility of Board and management 4

Vendor Management To perform functions on behalf of the institution To provide products and services institution doesn t originate To "franchise" the institution's attributes Institution lends its name or regulated entity status to products and services originated by others or activities predominantly conducted by others 5

Third Party Vendors Common third party arrangements include, but are not limited to: Credit card programs (e.g., cash-secured, affinity) Payday lending and other alternative credit programs Debit card programs; Rewards programs Deposit taking or affinity relationships; Overdraft payment programs Refund anticipation loans, Audit programs of third party relationships, Broker-dealer relationships for brokerage services, Mortgage brokerage services, Automobile dealer relationships, Flood determination services, and Reverse mortgage program 6

Potential Risks Arising from Third Party Relationships Strategic Compliance Reputation Potential Risk Credit Operational Transaction 7

Potential Risks Compliance risk Arises from violations of laws, rules, or regulations, or from noncompliance with internal policies or procedures or with institution's business standards Exists when the products or activities of a third party are not consistent with governing laws, rules, regulations, policies, or ethical standards Liability could potentially extend to institution Exacerbated when inadequate oversight, monitoring or audit functions 8

Potential Risks Strategic risk Arises from adverse business decisions, or the failure to implement appropriate business decisions in a manner that is consistent with institution's strategic goals Achieve strategic goals Provide an adequate return on investment Operational risk Risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, and systems or from external events Integrated internal processes Transaction risk Arising from problems with service or product delivery Failure to perform as expected by customers or the institution due to reasons such as inadequate capacity, technological failure, human error, or fraud Lack of an effective business resumption plan and appropriate contingency plans Weak control over technology may result in threats to security and the integrity of systems and resources Unauthorized transactions or the inability to transact business as expected 9

Potential Risks Credit risk Risk that a third party, or any other creditor necessary to the third party relationship, is unable to meet the terms of the contractual arrangements or to otherwise financially perform as agreed Basic form is the financial condition of the third party itself Appropriate monitoring of third party activity to understand credit risk and remains within board-approved limits Reputational risk Arises from negative public opinion Dissatisfied customers, interactions not consistent with institution s policies, inappropriate recommendations, security breaches resulting in disclosure of customer information, and violations of law and regulation Any negative publicity involving the third party, whether or not the publicity is related to institution's use of the third party Other risks Liquidity, interest rate, price, foreign currency translation, and country risks 10

Effective Third Party Risk Compliance Management (4) principal elements: Risk Assessment Assess risks and options for controlling third party arrangements Due Diligence in Selecting a Third Party Select a qualified entity to implement the activity or program Contract Structuring and Review Ensure specific expectations and obligations of both the institution and the third party are outlined in a written contract prior to entering into the arrangement Should serve as a map to the relationship and define its structure Oversight Review operational and financial performance of third party activities on an ongoing basis 11

Nexus for CMS Compliance Management System should incorporate (as applicable and as may be appropriate): Identification of significant third party relationships; Policies and procedures, internal controls, training, monitoring, and internal and external auditing procedures associated with third party relationships are consistent and have ongoing compliance with all applicable consumer protection laws and regulations Activities conducted through third parties are compliant with applicable consumer protection laws, fair lending regulations, and internal policies; and Appropriate corrective action when third party risk issues are identified or deficiencies are noted 12

Risk Assessment Fundamental to the initial decision of whether or not to enter into a third party relationship Areas to consider: Ensure that the proposed third party relationship is consistent with strategic planning and overall business strategy The strategic risk given size, resources, capacity, and number of employees Benefits, costs, legal aspects, and the potential risks associated with the third party under consideration Perform a risk/reward analysis, comparing the proposed third party relationship to other methods of performing the activity or product offering, including the use of other vendors or in-house staff Integral to overall strategic planning Performed by senior management and reviewed by the board or an appropriate committee Staff have the requisite knowledge and skills to adequately perform the risk analysis 13

Risk Assessment Additional areas to consider Certain aspects of the risk assessment phase may include use of internal or external auditors, compliance officers, technology officers, and legal counsel Identify performance criteria, internal controls, reporting needs, and contractual requirements that would be critical to the ongoing assessment and control of specific identified risks Review whether third party s activities could be viewed as predatory, discriminatory, abusive, unfair, or deceptive to the customers (both commercial and consumer) Ensure ability to provide adequate oversight and management of the proposed third party relationship on an ongoing basis Ensure a process in place for elevating new or significant third party relationships and issues to the board and appropriate committee for review and approval 14

Risk Rating Risk rate annually as part of third party monitoring High Risk Provides mission critical services Direct access to nonpublic or confidential customer information and account processing functions All foreign based service providers should be designated High Risk Moderate Risk Provides non-mission critical services Direct access to nonpublic or confidential customer information in a non-account processing function capacity Low Risk No direct access to nonpublic or confidential customer information Any Third party not formally categorized as High or Moderate Risk is presumed to be Low Risk 15

Due Diligence in Selecting a Third Party Audited financial statements, annual reports, Securities and Exchange Commission filings, and other available financial information Significance of the proposed contract on the third party s financial condition Experience and ability in implementing and monitoring the proposed activity Business reputation, including any complaints filed Span of business operations in which the third party is engaged Qualifications and experience of the company s principals Strategies and goals, including service philosophies, quality initiatives, efficiency improvements, and employment policies Existence of any significant complaints or litigation (past and pending), or supervisory actions against the company or its owners or principals 16

Due Diligence Ability to perform the proposed functions using current systems or the need to make additional investment Use of other parties or subcontractors by the third party Scope of internal controls, systems and data security, privacy protections, and audit coverage Business resumption strategy and contingency plans Knowledge of and background and experience with consumer protection and civil rights laws and regulations Underwriting criteria Adequacy of management information systems Insurance coverage Marketing materials to determine how the Institution s name will be associated with the product Websites Vendor and Institution management responsibilities 17

Due Diligence Other considerations: Probe for intangibles Business strategies and goals Human resources policies Service philosophies Quality initiatives Policies for managing costs and improving efficiency. Culture, values, and business styles 18

Contract Structuring and Review Scope Cost/Compensation Performance Standards Reports Audit Confidentiality and security Customer complaints Business resumption and continuity plans Default and termination Dispute resolution Ownership and license Indemnification Limitations on liability Foreign-based service providers Subcontracting 19

Performance Monitoring Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the third party relationship and the consistency of the relationship with the Institution's strategic goals Review any licensing or registrations to ensure the third party can legally perform its services Evaluate the third party's financial condition at least annually. Financial review should be as comprehensive as the credit risk analysis performed on the Institution's borrowing relationships. Audited financial statements should be required for significant third party relationships Review the adequacy of the third party's insurance coverage Ensure that the third party's financial obligations to others are being met Review audit reports or other reports of the third party, and follow up on any needed corrective actions Review the adequacy and adherence to the third party's policies relating to internal controls and security issues Monitor for compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations 20

Performance Monitoring 21 Review the adequacy and adherence to the third party's policies relating to internal controls and security issues Monitor for compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations Review the third party's business resumption contingency planning and testing Assess the effect of any changes in key third party personnel involved in the relationship with the Institution Review reports relating to the third party's performance in the context of contractual requirements and performance standards, with appropriate follow-up as needed Determine the adequacy of any training provided to employees of the Institution and the third party Administer any testing programs for third parties with direct interaction with customers Review customer complaints about the products and services provided by the third party and the resolution of the complaints Meet as needed with representatives of the third party to discuss performance and operational issues 21

Contingency Planning Outsourcing creates risk that vendor's operations can be disrupted and might affect the institution for the services vendor provides To mitigate, must ensure vendor has a prudent business recovery plan in place that is reviewed on an ongoing basis Must address the risk that vendor may not perform satisfactorily: In the face of unsatisfactory responsiveness, an institution's options include changing service providers, returning the activity to the institution, or sometimes even exiting the business. Such options are costly and problematic and are usually taken only as a last measure after reasonable efforts to resolve the issues with the vendor Consider mitigating risk by starting out small or limiting the number of services provided by the vendor 22

Board and Management Oversight Board and senior management is ultimately responsible for its third party relationships Maintain adequate oversight Allocate sufficient qualified staff to monitor significant third party relationships and provide the necessary oversight Maintain adequate quality control over products and services provided 23

Summary Best Practices Implement a comprehensive Vendor Management Program Establish third party risk management program to address activities and relationships Risk assessment Conduct due diligence commensurate with the risk in selection process Ensure relationship is governed by written contract Oversight Due diligence in selection process Ensure institution s ability to fulfill obligations to both customers and regulators Ensure mandatory protection of confidential information Contract structuring and review Develop and maintain contingency business plans, including back up facility testing 24

Resources FDIC: FIL 50-2016, Proposed Guidance for Third-Party Lending https://www.fdic.gov/news/news/financial/2016/fil16050.html See, e.g., CFPB Bulletin 2012-03, Service Providers (Apr. 13, 2012), http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201204_cfpb_bulletin_serviceproviders.pdf FDIC FIL 3-2012, Payment Processor Relationships Revised Guidance (Jan. 31, 2012), http://www.fdic.gov/news/news/financial/2012/fil12003.html FDIC FIL 44-2208, Managing Third-Party Risk (June 6, 2008), http://www.fdic.gov/news/news/financial/2008/fil08044a.html FDIC Examination Manual, Third Party Risk (Dec. 2102), http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/compliance/manual/pdf/vii-5.1.pdf NCUA Letter 07-CU-13, Evaluating Third Party Relationships (Dec. 2007), http://www.ncua.gov/resources/documents/lcu2007-13.pdf; OCC Bulletin OCC 2001-47, Third-Party Relationships (Nov. 1, 2001), http://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/bulletins/2001/bulletin-2001-47.html FFIEC IT Handbook Infobase, http://ithandbook.ffiec.gov/ 25

Questions? 26 2016 Temenos USA. All rights reserved.