Module 6 Book A: Principles of Contract Design. Agriculture Risk Management Team Agricultural and Rural Development The World Bank

Similar documents
3 RD MARCH 2009, KAMPALA, UGANDA

Three Components of a Premium

Disaster Management The

Africa RiskView Customisation Review. Terms of Reference of the Customisation Review Committee & Customisation Review Process

How to Explain and Use an Insurance Contract

Developing Index-Based Insurance for Agriculture in Developing Countries

Climate Risk Insurance Models from India

Agricultural Insurance for Developing Countries The Role of Governments

Lessons from Piloting Weather Index Insurance

Statistical Analysis of Rainfall Insurance Payouts in Southern India

Index Based Crop Insurance Initiative Kenya April 2012

Agriculture Index Insurance in India. With focus on Weather & Flood Index August 01, 2015

Making Index Insurance Work for the Poor

Investigating the Impact of Climate Change on the Robustness of Index-based Microinsurance in Malawi

Coverage and claim details Forage rainfall plan

Probabilistic Drought Hazard and Risk Model: A contribution of the Risk Nexus Initiative

Integrated Risk Management Strategies: Example of Malawi Food Security Strategy

ENSO Impact regions 10/21/12. ENSO Prediction and Policy. Index Insurance for Drought in Africa. Making the world a better place with science

Catastrophe Risk Financing Instruments. Abhas K. Jha Regional Coordinator, Disaster Risk Management East Asia and the Pacific

Risk, Insurance and Wages in General Equilibrium. A. Mushfiq Mobarak, Yale University Mark Rosenzweig, Yale University

INTRODUCTION OF WEATHER INDEX INSURANCE IN UKRAINE OBSTACLES AND

PRF Insurance: background

Our Efforts in Agricultural Market in SEA

GLOSSARY. 1 Crop Cutting Experiments

The Effects of Rainfall Insurance on the Agricultural Labor Market. A. Mushfiq Mobarak, Yale University Mark Rosenzweig, Yale University

Using Index-based Risk Transfer Products to Facilitate Rural Lending in Mongolia, Peru, Vietnam

Statistical Analysis of Rainfall Insurance Payouts in Southern India

PRICING OF INDEX INSURANCE USING BLACK-SCHOLES FRAMEWORK: A CASE STUDY OF GHANA

Growing emphasis on insurance systems

Assessment of the Risk Management Potential of a Rainfall Based Insurance Index. and Rainfall Options in Andhra Pradesh, India

Agriculture Index Insurance in Bangladesh. IWMI-IWM IBFI Inception Workshop, Dhaka 4 th November, 2015

Scaling-Up Micro Insurance

Global Resilience Risk

RTD on Climate Change Policy Reforms May 14, 2014

Agriculture insurance. Urgent needed actions and recommended Policy change to move Ag-Insurance forward

Reinsuring Group Revenue Insurance with. Exchange-Provided Revenue Contracts. Bruce A. Babcock, Dermot J. Hayes, and Steven Griffin

Agricultural Insurance and Regulatory Implications

Small Farmers Perspectives on Agricultural Insurance in Africa

Satellite-powered Agriculture Insurance: Opportunities and Regulatory Requirements

DEVELOP THE RIGHT PLAN FOR YOU.

Comparative Assessment of Selected Agricultural Weather Index Insurance Strategies in Sub-Saharan Africa

The Potential and Limitations of Index-based Weather Insurance

Advancing the Research Agenda for Financial Inclusion Panel on Insurance Shawn Cole (Harvard Business School) June 28, 2016, World Bank

Ex Ante Financing for Disaster Risk Management and Adaptation

Barriers to Household Risk Management: Evidence from India

Risk Management and Agricultural Insurance Schemes in Europe

Schindler Capital Management, LLC / Dairy Advantage Program. Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

KENYAN EXPERIENCE WITH PARAMETRIC INSURANCE. Presented by: Joseph A. Owuor Insurance Regulatory Authority - Kenya

Lessons learned: structuring and pricing index-based insurance in developing countries

Micro Insurance in Malawi Supply Side

E Distribution: GENERAL. Executive Board Annual Session. Rome, June 2006

Public-Private Partnerships for Agricultural Risk Management through Risk Layering

Food price stabilization: Concepts and exercises

INDEX BASED RISK TRANSFER AND INSURANCE MECHANISMS FOR ADAPTATION. Abedalrazq Khalil, PhD Water Resources Specialist, World Bank

Supply Chain. An Insurer Perspective. Willis Energy Summit 21 January 2016 Jamie Summons, Head of Weather Solutions, Asia Pacific

Focus on product quality

CLIENT VALUE & INDEX INSURANCE

African Risk Capacity. Sovereign Disaster Risk Solutions A Project of the African Union

Catastrophe Reinsurance Pricing

Evaluation of socio-economic feasibility of pilot micro-insurance schemes for cotton producers in Mozambique

Pricing indexed agricultural insurance: Lessons from India

: advanced weather risk management platform for global insurers, reinsurers and agricultural businesses

Overview of U.S. Crop Insurance Industry Insurance and Reinsurance

Financial Literacy, Social Networks, & Index Insurance

Pisco Sour? Insights from an Area Yield Pilot program in Pisco, Peru

THE PITFALLS OF EXPOSURE RATING A PRACTITIONERS GUIDE

Improving Your Crop Marketing Skills: Basis, Cost of Ownership, and Market Carry

Risk Management Tools for Malawi Food Security July 16, 2007 for Discussion Purposes J. Dana, D. Rohrbach, and J. Syroka

From managing crises to managing risks: The African Risk Capacity (ARC)

Modified National Agricultural Insurance Scheme (MNAIS)

Six months of FY ending December 31, (0.4) (1.9) 22.5 (0.4) (0.3) (0.4) (0.1) (0.4) (0.7) (2.0) 0.9 (1.

Background Paper. Market Risk Transfer. Phillippe R. D. Anderson The World Bank

Korean Trust Fund for ICT4D Technological Innovations in Rural Malawi: A Field Experimental Approach

Analysis of the Performance of the 2017 Agricultural Season in Mali

News & Development Rising Channel Ichimoku Cloud Tenken-sen KijunSen

Public Private partnerships in Agriculture The contribution of Kilimo Salama small scale weather index agriculture insurance in Kenya

Preparing and assessing an agriculture index insurance product proposal, Kampala, 25 th May, 2017

Futures and Options Live Cattle Feeder Cattle. Tim Petry Livestock Marketing Economist NDSU Extension Service

Wheat Outlook August 19, 2013 Volume 22, Number 45

Stakeholder Workshop Bangkok

Fall 2017 Crop Outlook Webinar

UAP - OLD MUTUAL MicroInsurance Brief

Ex-ante Impacts of Agricultural Insurance: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Mali

RUTH VARGAS HILL MAY 2012 INTRODUCTION

3rd May Monthly Report On. May 2017

Climate-related disasters & climate variability represent a major source of risks for the POOR in particular, the FARMERS who are dependent on good

Introduction to risk sharing and risk transfer with examples from Mongolia and Peru

Margin Protection Program (MPP-Dairy) ONLINE DECISION T L

FINANCIAL RISK TRANSFER MECHANISMS OVERVIEW

Investment banking department

Ukraine. World Bank Rural Finance Project (P076553) Initial Feasibility Study of Developing Weather Index Insurance

African Risk Capacity (ARC): Sovereign Disaster Risk Solutions

Economic review, first quarter to February 2018

INDIA. Crop Insurance Non-Lending Technical Assistance Summary of Policy Suggestions

Climate Insurance Fund

Crops Marketing and Management Update

INSTITUTE OF ACTUARIES OF INDIA

UK Grain Marketing Series November 5, Todd D. Davis Assistant Extension Professor. Economics

MONTHLY ECONOMIC REPORT MARCH 2014

Dynamic Change, Economic Fluctuations, and the AD-AS Model

Transcription:

+ Module 6 Book A: Principles of Contract Design Agriculture Risk Management Team Agricultural and Rural Development The World Bank

+ Module 6 in the Process of Developing Index Insurance Initial Idea Foundation Concepts Modules 1, 2, 3 Assess Pre-Feasibility Modules 4 Assess Technical Feasibility Modules 5, 6, 7 Implement Pilot Test Module 8

+ Requirements for an Index Insurance Product General considerations 1. An index based insurance contract must perform an insurance function for the buyer. It must: capture the agrometeorological risk in question provide timely and adequate payments 2. The performance of the contract must be checked against all possible sources of information (yield records, crop model output, expert information, etc.) in order to make sure that it would have triggered payouts when needed 3. Checks should be carried out also on how robust the contract design is, i.e. changes in the contract parameters or/and the local conditions should not alter the contract performance dramatically and how it is expeceted to perform in terms of minimizing basis risk

+ Anatomy of a Contract Main elements of a Rainfall Index Contract 1. The Index 2. The Protection Period 3. The Maximum Payout 4. The Payout Typology 5. The Payout Parameters: Trigger, Exit and Rate (tick) Level(s) 6. The Premium

+ Anatomy of a Contract Main elements of a Rainfall Index Contract 1. The Index: As discussed in detail in previous modules, the index is the critical element of any weather insurance contract developed on the basis of a parametric approach Once the index has been identified, a clear and exhaustive description of the index specifications and of the data used to construct it is the base of any index insurance transaction

+ Anatomy of a Contract Main elements of a Rainfall Index Contract 2. The Protection Period The risk protection period of the contract is the length of coverage, it includes the START and END date of the contract It can cover any period of the crop cycle considered appropriate but sales activity needs to be set accordingly The protection period can be single or multiple (phases contract) The START of the coverage period can be FIXED or DYNAMIC, i.e. can vary to mimic the farmer decision to when to sow his crop

+ Anatomy of a Contract Main elements of a Rainfall Index Contract 3. The Maximum Payout The maximum payout is the maximum compensation that the insurance contract can provide. If the contract is structured on multiple phases, each phase will also have its maximum payout

+ Anatomy of a Contract Main elements of a Rainfall Index Contract 4. The Payout Typology The payout can be provided according to different arrangements: Lump sum Continuous

Payout (currency unit per area) + Anatomy of a Contract LUMP-SUM PAYOUT Crop: Rice - Risk: Low temperatures Payout of 800 Units if temperature falls below 12 C during flowering 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 Minimum Temperature

Payout (currency unit per area) + Anatomy of a Contract CONTINUOS PAYOUT Crop: Maize - Risk: Rainfall deficit Continuous increase of payout per each mm of rainfall reduction between 50 mm and 10 mm 18000 16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Rainfall (mm)

+ Anatomy of a Contract Main elements of a Rainfall Index Contract 5. The Payout parameters (in a continuous payout structure) Trigger (strike): Level at which the weather protection begins and financial compensation is received Exit (limit): Level at which maximum payout is made to the client Payout Rate: The financial compensation per unit index deviation above or below the trigger(s). In the continuous payout typology the payout rate is also known as tick.

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 101 Payout (currency unit per area) Payout (currency unit per area) + Anatomy of a Contract Main elements of a Rainfall Index Contract Payout rate (tick) = Deficit Rainfall Coverage Max Payout 16,000 = --------------------- = ------------ = 400 Trigger Exit 50-10 Excessive Rainfall Coverage Max Payout = --------------------- Exit - Trigger 18000 18000 16000 16000 14000 14000 12000 12000 10000 10000 8000 8000 6000 6000 4000 4000 2000 2000 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Rainfall (mm) 0 Rainfall (mm)

+ Anatomy of a Contract Example of a payout structure Tick Trigger

+ Anatomy of a Contract Main elements of a Rainfall Index Contract 6. The Premium An initial estimate of the risk premium is provided by the Expected Loss defined as the arithmetic average payout of the contract in question from the historical dataset for the station: 10 7 3 10 Y1 Y10 Y21 Y22 Y30 E.g. If there are 4 historical payouts for a contract in the past 30 available years of cleaned data the EL is: EL = (10 + 7 + 3 + 10)/30 = 1

+ Anatomy of a Contract Payout and Premium Payout Frequency In general: high payout frequency causes larger premiums less interest in this contract by insurers/reinsurers higher administration costs for the insurer

+ Anatomy of a Contract The power of the trigger (the trigger rules ) The trigger determines: The risk retention level The probability of generating payout The pure risk premium level

+ Anatomy of a Contract Risk Retention Risk retention is also known as self- insurance and is similar to the deductible of the traditional indemnity based insurance policies In practice, it is the loss level which clients have manage before they external compensation provides financial support The retention level is influenced by the trigger level: Closer to seasonal average, lower the retention and the higher the payout probability Further away from seasonal average, the lower the contract premium

+ Anatomy of a Contract Layered risk transfer structure Insurance Risk Transfer Layer Self Retention Layer Reinsurance Catastrophe Gov

+ Module 6 Book B: Designing a Three-Phase Deficit Rainfall Contract Agriculture Risk Management Team Agricultural and Rural Development The World Bank

+ Phase Approach to Contract Design What level of sophistication to choose? Cumulative Indices: -Seasonal - Annual EASE TO COMMUNICATE Temporal distribution indices: -WRSI - Mechanistic models - Cognitive models INDEX COMPLEXITY

Weight + Phase Approach to Contract Design A distributional index 3 Sowing Head emergence Flowering Emergence 2 Tillering Stem elongation 1 0 Nov - 1 2 3 Dec - 1 2 3 Jan - 1 2 3 Feb - 1 2 3 Mar -1 2 3 Ten day period

+ Phase Approach to Contract Design First developed in India Great intuition developed by the Indian insurance company ICICI Lombard in 2004. After having implemented an initial distributional approach based on a weighted index, feedback from farmer led the Indian insurer to propose a simple segmented cumulative approach Such an approach carried the advantages of the weighted distributional index and the simplicity of a cumulated approach The design was chosen as the prototype groundnut structure for Malawi pilot in 2005 and for subsequent African pilots

Payout ($) Payout ($) Payout ($) + Phase Approach to Contract Design Different Phases, Different Parameters, Different Payouts 3. Trigger levels Deficit Rainfall (mm) Deficit Rainfall (mm) Deficit Rainfall (mm) 2. Phase lengths PHASE 1 Establishment PHASE 2 Growth & Flowering PHASE 3 Yield Formation to Harvest 1. Sowing Window & Dynamic Start Date Cropping Calendar Final Insurance Payout = min (Max Payout, Phase 1 + 2 + 3 Payouts)

+ Phase Approach to Contract Design Main advantages: Reduces basis risk by framing shorter period and taking care of rainfall distribution Allows to treat different requirements to water differently Easy to determine premium requirements and to relate to local agro-meteorological parameters/information Easy to communicate and retail to farmer clients.

+ Three Phase Deficit Rainfall Main features A phase deficit-rainfall insurance contract has the following features: A dynamic start date that mimics the decision a farmer would make as to when to sow his crop Two or more phases, during which cumulative rainfall is measured, with a trigger and exit levels in each phase. Trigger levels that correspond to rainfall levels at which the crop would begin to feel water-deficit stress for each phase Exit levels that determine the level at which the farmer would receive a maximum payout for each phase A payout rate per phase

Standardized Contract Design: Honduras Example Sowing Trigger 25 mm Growing Period Prod. Cost Risk: Drought Phase Distribution Trigger Tick Exit (mm) Starts Ends (US$) (mm) (US$/mm) 1 1 2 $157.50 40 20 $7.88 2 3 5 $210.00 75 30 $4.67 3 6 8 $350.00 20 10 $35.00 Cancel Total Loss (Phase 2)

+ 2008-2009 Malawi Tobacco & Paprika Contract Structure Examples Example: Kasungu Station Burley Tobacco Weighted Cumulative Weekly Excess, E Sum (W *max(0, Weekly Cumulative Rainfall 80)) e.g. 1.5 * 5 + 1.5 * 10 + 1.5 * 5 + 1 * 7 + 1 * 15 + 1 * 3 = 55 Total Contract Payout = max(0, D 85)*375 + max(0, E 110)*375 Max Payout 231,000 MKW per hectare 85mm 90mm 85mm 87mm 95mm 83mm 80mm 1 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 W 15 Nov 20 Dec 25mm 1 1.5 1.5 1.5 1 1 1.5 1.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.75 0.75 0.75 W Transplanting Window & Dynamic Start Date Weighted Cumulative Weekly Deficit, D Sum (W * max(0, 25 Weekly Cumulative Rainfall)) e.g. 1 * 2 + 1 * 10 + 1 * 15 + 1 * 10 = 37 15mm 10mm 15mm 23mm

+ Selecting Contract Parameters 1. Sowing Window: The time window within which a farmer should plant. 2. Rainfall Sowing Trigger: Some rainfall criteria that defines farmers desire to sow. 3. Phase Lengths: Stages correspond to the three major phenological stages of the plant s growth. 4. Phase Trigger Levels : Levels of cumulative rainfall per phase below which the compensation begins. 5. Phase Exits Levels: Levels of cumulative rainfall per phase below which a max payout per phase is made. 6. Maximum Payout per Contract: Payout of the contract is capped at a max payout level per hectare. 7. Maximum Payouts per Phase: These are the maximum payouts received per farmer per hectare insured. 8. Tick per Phase: Tick per Phase = Maximum Payout per Phase / (Trigger Level per Phase - Exit Level per Phase) 9. Rainfall Cap: Capped cumulative dekadal rainfall which represents max amout of rainfall a crop can use or the soil can only store.

+ Thank you