City and County of San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA)

Similar documents
Health Service System Trust Fund

City and County of San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) Presentation of Audit Results

Utility Debt Securitization Authority

University of Alaska Audit Results June 30, 2011

City Council Work Session Handouts. February 3, 2014

Report of External Auditor Audit Committee Open Agenda Item 4 November 17, 2011 Leigh Wilson, KPMG

I. AGENDA ITEM # AND TITLE : Open Agenda Item 6 - Report of External Auditor: KPMG 2015 Audit Plan

University of California

AUDIT WRAP UP. December 31, 2016

Assurance. Presentation to audit and reporting committee of Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority 2016 Financial statement audit plan

Assurance. Presentation to audit and reporting committee of Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority 2017 Financial statement audit plan

Communications with Those Charged with Governance. Masonic Homes of California and Subsidiaries

Poultry Science Association, Inc. Report to the Board of Directors July 7, 2016

Town of Fairview. Council Meeting March 1, 2016

Guam Housing Corporation

AUDITOR S RESPONSIBILITY UNDER AUDITING STANDARDS GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

OUR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER GENERALLY ACCEPTED AUDITING STANDARDS AND GENERALLY ACCEPTED GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS

Presentation to. Town of Fairview. Council Meeting March 7, 2017

Report to the Audit Committee of the Board of Governors 2017 Audit Results

City Council City of San José, California. Ladies and Gentlemen:

SONOMA COUNTY JUNIOR COLLEGE DISTRICT Communications With Those Charged With Governance

North Bay Developmental Disabilities Services, Inc. dba North Bay Regional Center

AUDITOR S RESPONSIBILITY UNDER AUDITING STANDARDS GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

AUDITOR S RESPONSIBILITY UNDER AUDITING STANDARDS GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

City of Greater Sudbury

OUR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER GENERALLY ACCEPTED AUDITING STANDARDS AND GENERALLY ACCEPTED GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS

OUR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER GENERALLY ACCEPTED AUDITING STANDARDS AND GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS

GAVILAN JOINT COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

Wipfli LLP 2501 West Beltline Highway, Suite 401 Madison, WI PO Box 8700 Madison, WI fax

OUR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER GENERALLY ACCEPTED AUDITING STANDARDS AND GENERALLY ACCEPTED GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS

COMMUNICATIONS WITH THOSE CHARGED WITH GOVERNANCE. Umpqua Community College

AUDITOR S RESPONSIBILITY UNDER AUDITING STANDARDS GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

January 13, Commissioners Consolidated Commission on Utilities. Dear Commissioners:

June 29, The Honorable Marcelo Peterson Governor, State of Pohnpei Federated States of Micronesia. Dear Governor Peterson:

2121 North California Blvd., Suite 290, Walnut Creek, California Tel: Fax:

IAASB Main Agenda (March 2005) Page Agenda Item [MARK-UP COPY]

July 6, Board of Directors American River Flood Control District 165 Commerce Circle, Suite D Sacramento, California 95815

AUDITOR S RESPONSIBILITY UNDER AUDITING STANDARDS GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

March 4, 2015 To the Board Members of the Housing Finance Authority of Pinellas County and Kathryn Driver, Executive Director We are pleased to

City and County of Denver Wastewater Management Enterprise Fund. Audit Wrap Up May 24, 2017

OUR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER GENERALLY ACCEPTED AUDITING STANDARDS AND GENERALLY ACCEPTED GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS

We wish to thank the staff and management of the Company for their cooperation and assistance during the course of this engagement.

The District Municipality of Muskoka

To issue an independent auditors management letter.

OUR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER GENERALLY ACCEPTED AUDITING STANDARDS AND GENERALLY ACCEPTED GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS

Board of Directors Arkansas Health Insurance Marketplace Little Rock, Arkansas

First Financial Bank Building 400 Pine Street, Ste. 600, Abilene, TX / / f:

Wipfli LLP 3703 Oakwood Hills Parkway Eau Claire, WI PO Box 690 Eau Claire, WI fax

OUR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER GENERALLY ACCEPTED AUDITING STANDARDS AND GENERALLY ACCEPTED GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS

Administrative Services Department

December 27, The Board of Directors Kosrae Port Authority. Dear Members of the Board of Directors:

Proposed International Standard on Auditing. Review of Interim Financial Information Performed by the Auditor of the Entity.

Auditing and Assurance Standards Council

November 8, Section III contains updated legislative and informational items that we believe will be of interest to you.

Providing Outstanding Service Since 1963

OUR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER GENERALLY ACCEPTED AUDITING STANDARDS AND GENERALLY ACCEPTED GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS

International Standard on Auditing (Ireland) 240

Dear Mr. Smith, Beacon Academy of Nevada Jobs for Nevada s Graduates Community Outreach Medical Center East Valley Family Services

NAHRO. Objectives. The Audit Process. Understand the audit process

Our Responsibility in Relation to the Financial Statement Audit

Powell River Regional District and Powell River Regional Hospital District Final Report to the Board of Directors

University of California Required Communications to The Regents Committee on Compliance and Audit

City of Greater Sudbury Audit Planning Report to the Finance Committee for year ending December 31, February, 2007

December 4, Board of Directors Micronesian Registration Advisors, Inc. Dear Members of the Board of Directors:

STANDARD FOR AUDITS OF SMALL ENTITIES

FHA-Lender ENGAGEMENT LETTER

City of Fort Worth. City Council Work Session March 28, 2017

May 2, Mr. Jon Fernandez Superintendent Guam Department of Education P.O. Box DE Hagatna, GU 96932

RECENT CHANGES IN STANDARDS ON AUDITING

OUR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER GENERALLY ACCEPTED AUDITING STANDARDS AND GENERALLY ACCEPTED GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS

A SSURANCE AND A DVISORY BUSINESS SERVICES A PRIL 28, City of Ottawa. Audit Results and Communications

Florida ABLE, Inc. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. June 30, 2016

OUR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER GENERALLY ACCEPTED AUDITING STANDARDS AND GENERALLY ACCEPTED GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS

Chapter 2 Professional Standards

Appointed Actuary s Report

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING 240 THE AUDITOR S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONSIDER FRAUD IN AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTENTS

AUDITOR GENERAL STATE OF FLORIDA G74 Claude Pepper Building 111 West Madison Street Tallahassee, Florida

Our Responsibility Under Auditing Standards Generally Accepted in the United States and OMB Circular A-133

City of Ottawa Financial Statement Audit Results

OUR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER GENERALLY ACCEPTED AUDITING STANDARDS AND GENERALLY ACCEPTED GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS

MID MICHIGAN BIG BROTHER BIG SISTERS CLARE, MICHIGAN FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2016

CITY OF SACRAMENTO. Report to the City Council. For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010

Auditing Operations and Completing the Audit. Chapter 16. Substantive Tests for Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.

STATE COLLEGE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of Finance and Operations

Nottingham City Homes

KANE COUNTY, ILLINOIS Geneva, Illinois

The Auditor s Responsibilities. Audit of Financial Statements

The General Manager and Members of the Buffalo Sewer Authority Board:

The Auditor s Responsibility to Consider Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements

CITY OF SACRAMENTO. Report to the City Council. For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2013

SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY. Schedule of Investments. May 31, 2014

AUDITOR S RESPONSIBILITY UNDER AUDITING STANDARDS GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

WATER AND SEWERAGE SYSTEM OF DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS An Enterprise Fund of the DuPage County, Illinois

POTTER COUNTY, TEXAS 2010 AUDIT REPORTING PACKAGE

OUR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER GENERALLY ACCEPTED AUDITING STANDARDS AND GENERALLY ACCEPTED GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS

International Standard on Auditing (UK) 240 (Revised June 2016)

The Finance and Audit Committee of Board of Trustees

Agenda Item 1A. Omnibus Statement on Auditing Standards 2018

Florida ABLE, Inc. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. June 30, 2018

Edition Volume II

Transcription:

City and County of San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) Audit results Financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2017 December 5, 2017 This presentation to the SFMTA Board of Directors is intended solely for the information and use of the SFMTA Board of Directors and management and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. This presentation is not intended for general use, circulation, or publication and should not be published, circulated, reproduced, or used for any purpose without our prior written permission in each specific instance.

Auditors Required Understanding Communications There were no: - Uncorrected or corrected misstatements identified during the audit - Control deficiencies identified during the audit Reporting Timeline: - The audit was completed and the report was issued in accordance with set timeline. 2

Significant Risk Skepticism M anagement override of controls Management is in a unique position to perpetrate fraud because of its ability to manipulate accounting records and prepare fraudulent financial statements by overriding controls that appear to be operating correctly. Significant risk of fraud The risk Management is in a unique position to perpetrate fraud because of management's ability to manipulate accounting records and prepare fraudulent financial statements by overriding controls that otherwise appear to be operating effectively. Although the level of risk of management override of controls will vary from entity to entity, the risk nevertheless is present in all entities. Our response Int ernal cont rols Assessed management s design and implementation of controls over journal entries and post-closing adjustments Subst ant ive procedures Tested post close and consolidating adjustments Audited significant accounting estimates Audited significant unusual transactions (none noted) Read board minutes 3

Significant Risk Skepticism Specialists Accrued Worker s compensation and general liabilit y M anagement process used to develop significant accounting estimate Based upon a number of assumptions Methodology is consistent with prior year. Prepared by external actuarial experts based on information provided by management Significant assumptions used that have a high degree of subjectivity None noted Our response Int ernal cont rols Assessed the test of design and implementation of management s review over the actuarial liability. Subst ant ive procedures Tested underlying data Engaged KPMG actuary to review assum ptions Reviewed actuary report Our f indings No findings noted. Assumptions and inputs appear reasonable. No disconfirming evidence noted. 4

Significant Estimate Skepticism Specialists Pension Liabilit y M anagement process used to develop significant accounting estimate The City estimates the pension liability and allocates this estimate to the departments on a consistent methodology. Our response Subst ant ive procedures Tested census data underlying data Engaged KPMG actuary to review assum ptions Reviewed actuary report Recalculated the department s share of liability Our f indings No findings noted. Assumptions and inputs appear reasonable. No disconfirming evidence noted. 5

Significant accounting Understanding practices Significant accounting policies and practices Significant accounting policies/procedures are described in Note 2 to the financial statements Results of evaluation and conclusions about the qualitative aspects In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and consistent with industry practices and standards 6

Required communications Type and other matters Related parties Response None noted Type Other information Response No material inconsistencies were identified related to other information in the annual report. Illegal acts or fraud No actual or suspected fraud management, employees with significant roles in internal control, or where fraud results in a material misstatement in the financial statements were identified during the audit. Significant difficulties encountered during the audit Disagreements with management or scope limitations No matters to report. No matters to report. Noncompliance with laws and regulations None noted. Management s consultation with other accountants No matters to report. Modifications to auditor s report Subsequent events None. None noted Significant issues discussed, or subject to correspondence with, management Difficult or contentious matters for which the auditors consulted No matters to report. No matters to report. Material Written Communications between KPMG and Management Engagement letter & Management representation letter to be requested upon request 7

Responsibilities Reporting M anagement is responsible for: Preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements, including disclosures, in conformity with generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS) For the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error Ensuring that the SFMTA operations are conducted in accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations, including compliance with the provisions of laws and regulations that determine the reported amounts and disclosures in the SFMTA s financial statements, and for informing the auditor of any known material violations of such law s and regulations To provide access to all information of which management is aware that is relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements, such as records, documentation, and other matters, additional information that we may request from management for the purpose of the audit, and unrestricted access to persons w ithin the entity from w hom we determine it necessary to obtain audit evidence. Adjusting the financial statements to correct material misstatements and affirming that the effects of any uncorrected misstatements aggregated by the auditor are immaterial, both individually and in the aggregate, to the financial statements taken as a w hole. Providing the auditor with a letter confirming certain representations made during the audit that includes, but is not limited to, management s: Disclosure of all significant deficiencies, including material weaknesses, in the design or operation of internal controls that could adversely affect the SFMTA s financial reporting Acknowledgement of their responsibility for the design and implementation of programs and controls to prevent, deter, and detect fraud. 8

Responsibilities (continued) Reporting The SFM TA Board of Directors is responsible for: Oversight of the financial reporting process and oversight of ICOFR Oversight of the establishment and maintenance by management of programs and controls designed to prevent, deter, and detect fraud. Management and the SFMTA Board of Directors are responsible for: Setting the proper tone and creating and maintaining a culture of honesty and high ethical standards. The audit of the financial statements does not relieve management or the SFMTA Board of Directors of their responsibilities. 9

Responsibilities (continued) Reporting KPMG is responsible for: Planning and performing our audit, with an attitude of professional skepticism, to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error. Accordingly, there is some risk that a material misstatement of the financial statements will remain undetected. Although not absolute assurance, reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance. Our audit is not designed to detect error or fraud that is immaterial to the financial statements. Conducting the audit in accordance with professional standards and complying with the rules and regulations of the Code of Professional Conduct of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the ethical standards of relevant CPA societies, and relevant state boards of accountancy Forming and expressing an opinion about whether the financial statements that have been prepared by management with the oversight of the SFMTA Board of Directors are presented fairly, in all material respects, in conformity with GAAS An audit of the financial statements includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity s internal control over financial reporting. Communicating to the SFMTA Board of Directors all required information, including significant matters, that are in our professional judgment, relevant to the responsibilities of those charged with governance in overseeing the financial reporting process. Communicating to management and the SFMTA Board of Directors in writing all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in internal control identified during the audit and reporting to management in writing all deficiencies noted during our audit that, in our professional judgment, are of sufficient importance to merit management s attention. The objective of our audit of the financial statements is not to report on the Company s internal control and we are not obligated to search for material weaknesses or significant deficiencies as part of our audit of the financial statements. Communicating to the SFMTA Board of Directors circumstances that affect the form and content of the auditors report, if any. 10

Responsibilities for other Reporting information in documents containing audited financial The auditors report on the financial statements does not extend to other information in documents containing audited financial statements, excluding required supplementary information. statements The auditors responsibility is to make appropriate arrangements with management or the SFMTA Board of Directors to obtain the other information prior to the report release date and to read the other information to identify material inconsistencies with the audited financial statements or material misstatements of fact. Any material inconsistencies or misstatements of facts that are not resolved prior to the report release date, and that require revision of the other information, may result in KPMG modifying or withholding the auditors report or withdrawing from the engagement. We have performed the following procedures with respect to other information in documents: Apply certain limited procedures to MD&A (management s discussion and analysis) as it is required to be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. No opinion is expressed and no assurance is provided on this information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. 11

kpmg.com/socialmedia 2017 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative ( KPMG International ), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of KPMG International. 12