New Issue: Moody's assigns A3 to Xavier University, OH's $47.5M Ser. 2015C; outlook stable

Similar documents
New Issue: Moody's assigns MIG 1 to Oakland City's (CA) TRAN

Duquesne University, PA

Duquesne University of the Holy Spirit, PA

Grinnell College, IA

American University, DC

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aaa to Bronxville NY's $5.2M GO Bonds

New Issue: Moody's assigns an underlying Aa1 rating to Alpine School District, UT's G.O. bonds

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to West Virginia SBA's $44.4M Capital Improvement Ref. Rev. Bonds, Ser Global Credit Research - 08 Sep 2017

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to 2016B & C Senior Bonds of Central Florida Expressway Auth. (CFX), FL; Outlook positive

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A1 to UConn GO bonds supported by State of Connecticut; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 29 Mar 2018

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa3 ratings to State of Connecticut G.O. Bonds; outlook is stable

New Issue: Moody's revises Pittsburgh PA's outlook to positive; affirms A1

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Lowe's unsecured ratings to Baa1; P-2 commercial paper rating affirmed 12 Dec 2018

Rating Update: Moody's affirms Whitman College's (WA) Aa3/VMIG 1 rating on Series 2004 and 2008 Revenue Bonds; outlook is stable

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to Trinity Health Credit Group's (MI) Ser bonds; outlook revised to stable

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa3 to Florida International Univ. $27M 2015A Dorm. Rev. Ref. Bonds; outlook stable

Rollins College, FL. New Issue - Moody's Assigns A2 to Rollins College's (FL) Series 2016A; Outlook Stable. CREDIT OPINION 24 May 2016.

New Issue: Moody's assigns MIG 1 to Oakland City's (CA) TRAN

Special Tax: Transportation-Related

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago, IL

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades SURA Asset Management to Baa1; outlook stable

Rating Action: Moody's Upgrades the City of Sacramento, CA's Lease Revenue Bonds to A1; Confirms Ser and Ser. 1993A at A2; outlook is stable

Cherokee County Board of Education, AL

New Issue: Moody's assigns A1 rating to Rush University Medical Center Obligated Group (IL) Series 2015A&B bonds; outlook stable

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 to Framingham, MA's $43.9M GO bonds, MIG 1 to $4.4M GO BANs

The College of New Jersey, NJ

Moody s Methodologies & Florida Update

Metropolitan Opera Association, NY

Disruption in Higher Education: What Does It Mean For Credit Ratings

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa2 UND/Aa3 ENH to Roswell ISD (Chaves County), NM's GOULT bonds, Ser Sep 2018

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades PGW (PA) to A3 from Baa1; Assigns A3 to $278.2 mil Gas Works Rev. Refunding Bds., 15th Series

Rating Update: Moody's affirms Aa3 on Waukegan Park District, IL's GO debt

New Issue: Moody's assigns A1 to Ford County USD No. 443's (KS) GOs Series 2015-A and Series 2015-B

Global Credit Research - 24 Feb 2012 ASSIGNS A2 RATING TO $24.6 MILLION G.O. BONDS, 2012 SERIES A & B

New Issue: Moody's upgrades Edgewater, NJ's GO to Aa2: assigns MIG 1 to $15.4M in BANs

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 to Oak Creek, WI's $2.7M GO Bonds, Ser. 2014B


Rating Action: Moody's downgrades South Carolina Public Service Authority revenue bonds; rating outlook negative

Vanderbilt University, TN

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aa1 issuer and bond ratings of the International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm) with a stable outlook

Dallas County Community College District, TX

Ci1r of' SACRAMENTO. O ffice of t he City Treasu rer. Russell Fehr~ City Treasurer ADDITIONAL (VOLUNTARY) DISCLOSURE RATING AFFIRMED

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Dell's CFR to Ba2; outlook stable

Connecticut (State of) State Revolving Fund

Volusia County School District (FL)

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa1 to $450M of Massachusetts GO bonds; outlook stable

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings in the European Union

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aaa IFS rating of New York Life; stable outlook Global Credit Research - 27 Jul 2017

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Peruvian banks

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Blue Racer's senior notes to B2, rates new notes

Columbia School District, MO

Moody s Upgrades Montco s Outlook

YMCA of Greater New York, NY

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades ratings of 15 European covered bonds following methodology update

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings

Lubbock (City of), TX

Rating Update: Moody's upgrades Central Falls' (RI) GO rating to Ba3 from B1; outlook is stable

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Coty's CFR to Ba3; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 20 Mar 2018

Rating Action: Moody's announces rating actions on student loan ABS backed by FFELP student loans following the update of its rating methodology

Jersey City Community Charter School, NJ

West Fargo Public School District No. 6, ND

Roselle Park Borough, NJ

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A1 to San Francisco Airport Commission, CA Series 2018B-G; outlook is stable 01 May 2018

State Outlook: Debt Affordability. NCSL Conference Gail Sussman, Managing Director

Concord Hospital, NH

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades MBIA Inc. and National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. (IFS to Baa2); MBIA Insurance Corp.

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Coty's CFR to B1; outlook negative 26 Nov 2018

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Santander Consumer Finance's deposit ratings to Baa1; maintains stable outlook

Town of Beekman, NY. Credit Strengths. Solid reserve and liquidity levels. Low debt burden with rapid repayment. Credit Challenges

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Caa3 Issuer Rating to US Virgin Islands; lowers ratings on four liens of Matching Fund Revenue Bonds

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Baa3 senior unsecured debt ratings of ICICI Bank's Bahrain branch Global Credit Research - 17 Aug 2017

Massachusetts (Commonwealth of)

Huffman Independent School District, TX

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to Wayne County Airport Auth. (MI) Series 2017 E senior lien revenue bonds

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades AES Chivor's ratings to Baa3 from Ba1; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 30 May 2014

MooDY's. Regulatory Disclosures. Page 1 of5 INVESTORS SERVICE. Identifier: MDY:

City of Las Cruces, NM

New Issue: Moody's assigns A1 rating to the George Washington University's (DC) $170 million Taxable Bonds, Series 2013; outlook is stable

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Hera's Baa1 rating; negative outlook Global Credit Research - 03 Dec 2013

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa1 to Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District's (MO) $150M on Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Series 2013B

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades the ratings of MBIA group: National Public Finance Guarantee to A3 Global Credit Research - 21 May 2014

George W. Kuhn Drainage District (Oakland County), MI

For personal use only

Town of Easton, MA. Credit Strengths. Manageable long-term liabilities. Credit Challenges. Reliance on reserves to address budget gaps

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Counterparty Risk Ratings to three Sri Lankan banks 18 Jun 2018

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades IFS rating of MBIA Insurance Corporation to B3; rating on review for further downgrade

Rating Action: Moody's changes Hella's outlook to positive; affirms ratings Global Credit Research - 31 Aug 2017

Sanger (City of) TX. Credit Strengths. Trend of growing reserve levels. Continued tax base growth. Favorable location 40 miles north of Dallas

Somerset Hills School District, NJ

Agenda. New Mexico School District Bond Ratings 9/8/17

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Suriname's issuer rating to B2 negative; concluding rating review Global Credit Research - 20 Feb 2018

Park District of La Grange, IL

Rating Action: Moody's assigns provisional (P)Aaa to Belfius Bank's public sector covered bonds

Rating Action: Moody's affirms B2 IFS rating of MBIA Insurance Corporation; changes outlook to negative Global Credit Research - 03 Mar 2015

OECD Workshop on Data Collection

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 rating to Tustin Unified School District (USD) School Facilities Improvement District's (SFID) (CA) GO Bonds

A1 underlying rating affects $10.97 million in outstanding parity debt, inclusive of the current sale UNDERLYING RATING

Taos Municipal School District 1, NM

Socorro Independent School District, TX

Policy for Withdrawal of Credit Ratings

Transcription:

New Issue: Moody's assigns A3 to Xavier University, OH's $47.5M Ser. 2015C; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 13 Feb 2015 $96M pro-forma rated debt OHIO HIGHER EDUCATIONAL FACILITY COMMISSION Private Colleges & Universities OH Moody's Rating ISSUE RATING Revenue Bonds, Series 2015C A3 Sale Amount $47,500,000 Expected Sale Date 03/04/15 Rating Description Revenue: 501c3 Unsecured General Obligation Moody's Outlook STA NEW YORK, February 13, 2015 --Moody's Investors Service assigns an A3 rating to Xavier University's (Xavier or XU) proposed $47.5 million of fixed rated Series 2015C Revenue Bonds (expected to mature in FY 2038) to be issued through the Ohio Higher Educational Facility Commission. We also affirm the A3 rating on the university's outstanding rated bonds. The outlook is stable. SUMMARY RATING RATIONALE Assignment of the A3 rating is attributable to Xavier's established regional reputation as a private Catholic university with programmatic diversity and consistent gift support. The rating also incorporates XU's ability to achieve positive operating performance and adequate debt service coverage through strong budgetary controls. The rating is constrained by a high degree of operating and balance sheet leverage and pressures on top line revenue growth due to declining enrollment. OUTLOOK The stable outlook reflects expectations of positive operating performance and adequate debt service coverage. It also incorporates the expectation of no additional debt or significant use of reserves within the next 18 to 24 months. WHAT COULD MAKE THE RATING GO UP - Significant growth in financial resources and liquidity providing a stronger cushion to debt and operations - Increased student demand leading to consistent net tuition revenue growth WHAT COULD MAKE THE RATING GO DOWN - Sustained operating deficits and weaker cash flow - Significant decline in liquidity and flexible financial reserves - Large additional borrowings absent growth in financial resources and revenue

STRENGTHS - Consistently strong cash flow driven by prudent fiscal management - Established regional demand as a private Catholic Jesuit university offering a variety of undergraduate and graduate programs providing a cushion against moderate enrollment volatility - Relatively large $170 million revenue base for the rating category enabling it to achieve efficiencies - Lower risks of put and remarketing with the refinancing of the Series 2008A and 2008B variable rate demand bonds CHALLENGES - Three consecutive years of stagnant operating revenue driven by tepid net tuition revenue growth - Highly competitive market evidenced by declining total enrollment and weak yield of first year students - High financial leverage with expendable financial resources cushioning pro-forma debt 0.9 times and pro-forma debt to operating revenues of 1.1 times in FY 2014 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS In addition to the proposed refinancing of the Series 2008C fixed rate bonds, XU is refunding the Series 2008A and 2008B bonds on March 12 with proceeds from a direct bank placement (Series 2015A and Series 2015B bonds) which closed on February 10. We have reviewed draft documents. While this proposed refinancing has eliminated put risk and letter of credit risk, certain events of default could lead to acceleration of the debt, including but not limited to breach of financial covenants or reporting requirements, material adverse changes, and bankruptcy. The Series 2015A and 2015B bonds have a variable rate tied to LIBOR and a mandatory tender on February 1, 2025. DETAILED RATING RATIONALE MARKET POSITION: SOFTENING ENROLLMENT DRIVEN BY COMPETITIVE STUDENT MARKET Xavier's more targeted approach to undergraduate recruitment resulted in another strong first-year class size that has led to increasing undergraduate enrollment amid declining graduate enrollments. However, total enrollment declined again in fall 2014 by 1% to 5,920 full-time equivalent (FTE) students. The lower graduate enrollment and highly competitive undergraduate market is demonstrated by a slight contraction of net tuition per student of 0.1% to $17,104 in FY 2014 and likely pressure for FY 2015 given an increased discount rate. The slide in graduate students is primarily due to XU's declining enrollment in its large teacher education population and high competition in MBA programs, particularly in the Cincinnati region. Management forecasts graduate enrollment to stabilize by fall 2016 as it has reorganized the enrollment and recruiting functions. Failure to grow net tuition revenue given the university's material dependence on student charges revenue (77% in FY 2014), would likely pressure the rating longer term. OPERATING PERFORMANCE, BALANCE SHEET, AND CAPITAL PLANS: OPERATING SURPLUSES ACHIEVED DESPITE REVENUE PRESSURE; COMPREHENSIVE CAMPAIGN AIDS MARGINS AND FINANCIAL RESOURCE GROWTH Despite flat revenues since FY 2012, Xavier's strong fiscal oversight has driven positive margins averaging a three-year annual operating surplus of 3.7% in FY 2014. The improved margins are the result of expense containment and good unrestricted gift revenues. The fiscal 2014 operations benefited from various initiatives, chiefly the university's reduction in force that eliminated 51 non-faculty positions (8% of the workforce) with the majority of the savings realized in FY 2015. The cash flow margin was a strong 18.1% leading to a three-year average debt service coverage of 2.3 times from FY 2012-2014. Based on performance for the first six months of fiscal 2015, operating results should be positive. A continued softening of graduate enrollment will continue to constrain net tuition revenue growth in FY 2015. In light of missed graduate enrollment targets of the past few years, management reports it will budget enrollment more conservatively in the FY 2016 budget because it remains committed to maintaining surpluses. XU is in the quiet phase of a $240 million capital campaign, which includes a target of $100 million for the

endowment, $80 million from the Annual Fund for various programs, and the remaining $60 million is be raised to fund capital projects. To date, a total of $75 million has been raised of which $45 million has been collected. The university is assessing the feasibility for building a new Recreation Center. The project is a fundraising priority, but the university will be assessing different funding options. Project costs, funding sources, program planning and full design are expected to take approximately two years. We will assess the impact of any potential debt issuance on Xavier's credit profile when more solid plans materialize. Plans for capital expenditures for facilities during the next three years are focused on renewal of existing facilities. Overall, the buildings on Xavier's campus are relatively young in their life cycle with an age of plant of 9.7 years. XU will complete an $18 million renovation of Alter Hall, the university's main classroom building for the fall 2015 semester. The total project is being funded without debt, primarily from cash flows. Liquidity Monthly liquidity has increased by over 30% since FY 2012 to $129 million from retained surpluses, unrestricted gifts and healthy investment returns, providing a very strong 317 monthly days cash on hand. Improved liquidity is credit positive given XU's leverage, although the debt restructuring has reduced exposure to calls on liquidity. DEBT AND OTHER LIABILITIES: HIGH LEVERAGE; RECENT RESTRUCTURINGS REDUCE CERTAIN DEBT STRUCTURE RISKS Xavier's approach over the past several years to debt restructuring and refinancings was strategic, eliminating letter of credit exposure by the end of FY 2015 while reducing costs and debt. Debt Structure Approximately 38% of pro-forma debt (includes the proposed refunding of Series 2008 A, B, C bonds and May 1, 2015 principal payments) is variable rate (before swaps) and the university has no demand debt. However, 48% of XU's debt portfolio has bank debt exposure and is subject to financial covenants and certain requirements that could lead to acceleration of debt if breached. XU's debt is amortizing and reaches peak pro-forma debt service of $13.3 million in FY 2028, with maturities extending out to 2042. Financial Covenants include an agreement to maintain maximum annual debt service to total unrestricted operating revenues of less than 12% and expendable net assets of at least equal to 50% of long-term debt. At FYE 2014, the ratios were 8% and 94%, respectively. Debt-Related Derivatives XU has three floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements with total $117.5 million notional across two counterparties, one a forward swap starting May 1, 2016. Under each agreement, termination events include downgrade of either party's credit rating below BBB/Baa2. Xavier would be required to post collateral at a threshold of $20 million and $25 million, respectively, per each agreement at its current rating level. The aggregate mark-to-market on the swaps at June 30, 2014 was a liability to XU of $15.9 million and there was no collateral posted. Pensions and OPEB Xavier participates in a defined contribution plan that covers substantially all full-time employees through which the university and plan participants make contributions. XU's contributions totaled $5.1 million in FY 2014, approximately 3% of total expenses. In addition to the defined contribution plan, XU also sponsors a defined benefit health care plan that provides postretirement medical benefits to full-time employees who meet minimum age and service requirements. As of January 1, 1995, the plan was amended to require employee contributions and established a maximum monthly benefit to be provided by the university. At FYE 2014, the OPEB liability was $4.5 million, easily managed given the university's financial resources. MANAGEMENT AND GOVERNANCE: FISCAL STEWARDSHIP LEADS TO IMPROVED OPERATING PERFORMANCE AMID REVENUE PRESSURE XU's stable executive leadership team and board have demonstrated the ability to achieve and commitment to favorable operating performance amid revenue pressures. Two consecutive years of expense reductions leading to a higher surplus in FY 2014 demonstrates this commitment. While expenses have declined, management

continues to invest in priority areas and programs with the aim of growing revenue. For example, XU plans to hire a chief marketing officer in 2015 in recognition of a highly competitive market and importance of dedicating a fulltime employee to outreach and branding. KEY STATISTICS (FY 2014 financial data, fall 2014 enrollment data) - Full-Time Equivalent Enrollment: 5,920 students - Total Financial Resources: $261 million - Total Pro-forma Direct Debt: $187 million (includes proposed refunding of Series 2008 A, B, C bonds and May 1, 2015 principal payments) - Total Operating Revenue: $170 million - Reliance on Student Charges (% of Moody's-adjusted Operating Revenue): 77% - Monthly Days Cash on Hand: 317 days - Operating Cash Flow Margin: 18% OBLIGOR PROFILE Xavier University, founded in 1831, is a Jesuit Catholic comprehensive private university located in Cincinnati, Ohio. In fall 2014, the university enrolled 5,920 FTE students of which 75% were undergraduates. LEGAL SECURITY The bonds are a general obligation of the university. In addition, XU has pledged a lien on and a security interest in all revenues and income of the university. There is no debt service reserve fund. USE OF PROCEEDS Proceeds of the Series 2015C bonds are expected to be used to advance refund all or a portion of the Series 2008C bonds and pay issuance costs. PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY The principal methodology used in this rating was U.S. Not-for-Profit Private and Public Higher Education published in August 2011. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology. REGULATORY DISCLOSURES For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com. Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review. Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating. Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.

Analysts Erin V. Ortiz Lead Analyst Public Finance Group Moody's Investors Service Susan Shaffer Backup Analyst Public Finance Group Moody's Investors Service Diane F. Viacava Additional Contact Public Finance Group Moody's Investors Service Contacts Journalists: (212) 553-0376 Research Clients: (212) 553-1653 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 USA 2015 Moody's Corporation, Moody's Investors Service, Inc., Moody's Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ("MIS") AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATION") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER

CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO CONSIDER MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS IN MAKING ANY INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody s Publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER

OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody s Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations Corporate Governance Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy." For Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody's Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY'S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail clients. It would be dangerous for "retail clients" to make any investment decision based on MOODY'S credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.