Reserving for Solvency II What you need to be doing NOW!

Similar documents
Reserving for Solvency II What UK actuaries will be doing differently

Solvency II and Technical Provisions Dealing with the risk margin

Solvency II Internal Model SCr & TP workshop

Solvency II. TP, Standard Formula & IMSCR Workshop. 8 & 23 August Lloyd s

Introduction to IFRS November 2018

Solvency II & Risk Assurance 2015 plan

Syndicate SCR For 2019 Year of Account Instructions for Submission of the Lloyd s Capital Return and Methodology Document for Capital Setting

IFRS 17: implementation challenges. John Bolger, Andrew Kay

IFRS II/Solvency II Technical Provisions What does the future state reserving look like? Susan Dreksler and Nirav Patel, PwC

Signing Actuaries Forum 7 th November Catherine Scullion and Taraash Gautam, Lloyd s

Pandemics, Catastrophic Trends and Capital Issues

The Society of Actuaries in Ireland

IFRS 17 for non-life insurers

Syndicate SCR For 2019 Year of Account Instructions for Submission of the Lloyd s Capital Return and Methodology Document for Capital Setting

CEIOPS-FS-11/ For each segment, technical provisions should be shown on the following bases:

Internal model outputs (Non-life) Log Instructions for templates IM IM and MO MO )NL.IMS.01-NL.IMS.

2017 Operating Budget

20/06/2016. IFRS 4 Phase II: Solvency II with a twist? Susan Dreksler and Bob Owel. Agenda

Revised Educational Note. Premium Liabilities. Committee on Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Reporting. March 2015.

IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts Breakfast Briefing Series Launch event 30 May 2017

Tax in Solvency II. Ayesha Patel. 10 June Tel: June 2014

Lloyd s Valuation of Liabilities Rules

SCHEDULE P: MEMORIZE ME!!!

Results of the QIS5 Report

Lloyd s Signing Actuaries Forum

Information session on IFRS 17

Current status of Solvency II and challenges down the line. Matthew Edwards 11 October 2011

Spheria Australian Smaller Companies Fund

The valuation of insurance liabilities under Solvency 2

Recent developments in Pillar 3

ECONOMIC CAPITAL MODELING CARe Seminar JUNE 2016

Transitional Measure on Technical Provisions IFoA Working Party Emerging Findings

EIOPA Explanatory notes on reporting templates. Variation Analysis templates

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS

RS Official Gazette No 42/2015

Performance Report October 2018

Guidance on the Actuarial Function April 2016

IFRS 17 A Non-Life Perspective. Darren Shaughnessy, Joanne Lonergan

IFRS 4 / IND AS 104 As applicable to General Insurance Companies

Society of Actuaries in Ireland

PASSENGER REJECTION REDUCTION INITIATIVE KIRK PEREIRA. 24 th April 2018

HIPIOWA - IOWA COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH ASSOCIATION Unaudited Balance Sheet As of July 31

HIPIOWA - IOWA COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH ASSOCIATION Unaudited Balance Sheet As of January 31

Using Solvency II to implement IFRS 17

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE INVESTMENT COMMITTEE

XML Publisher Balance Sheet Vision Operations (USA) Feb-02

PRA Solvency II update James Orr. 29 April 2015

IFRS 17 Overview, Challenges and Opportunities. Andrew Kay 22 June 2017

CEIOPS-DOC January 2010

Internal model outputs (Non-life) Log (for templates NL.IMS.01-NL.IMS.10)

Solvency ii. Valuation & Balance Sheet and RePORTING & DISCLOSURE workshops. 22 & 23 June Lloyd s

IFRS 4 Phase 2 Exposure Draft. 15 January 2014

Guidance on the Actuarial Function MARCH 2018

Solvency II Frequently Asked Questions

What brings IFRS November 2017

Best Estimate Technical Provisions

Update from the FSA. Current Issues in General Insurance Conference, May 2010 James Orr and Vishal Desai

GIRO October, Edinburgh

2016 Spring Conference And Training Seminar. Cash Planning and Forecasting

Solvency II The Reporting Challenge

SOLVENCY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT 28 FEBRUARY 2018

Second Revision Educational Note. Premium Liabilities. Committee on Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Reporting. July 2016.

1.2 The purpose of the Finance Committee is to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities related to:

GIRO Working Party. Role of the Actuarial Function under Solvency II. Authors. October 2011

The future of insurance accounting preparing for change

Appendix 4b. Individual Results Life Companies. 1 Proposed title

HUD NSP-1 Reporting Apr 2010 Grantee Report - New Mexico State Program

SOLVENCY II Level 2 Implementing Measures

INTRODUCTION TO IFRS 17

Actuarial transformation: the route to IFRS17 smart compliance? Presentation to Fagkomité Skade Reserving Seminar 28 May 2018

Big Walnut Local School District

Solvency II Technical Provisions data suggestions for allocation methodologies. may 2011

Board for Actuarial Standards

SedonaOffice Users Conference. San Francisco, CA January 21 24, Deferred Income. Presented by: Bob Esquerra Debbie Stephens

Integration & Aggregation in Risk Management: An Insurance Perspective

Solvency II Update Tokyo, 16 October Dr. Winfried Heinen

RISK BASED CAPITAL AND SOLVENCY

Patrik. I really like the Cape Cod method. The math is simple and you don t have to think too hard.

Comment Letter No. 44

Contract Certainty Subscription Market Progress Update for FSA

CEIOPS-DOC-38/09. (former CP 44) October 2009

Big Walnut Local School District

Back to basis Evolving technical matters

Basic Reserving: Estimating the Liability for Unpaid Claims

Insurance Contracts Project Overview

IFRS 17 beyond implementation, towards commercial implications

Cost Estimation of a Manufacturing Company

April 2007 CEIOPS-FS-11/07

Number Date Reference

An Introduction to Solvency II

THE INSTITUTE OF ACTUARIES OF AUSTRALIA A.B.N

Headline Verdana Bold IFRS 17: What does the long awaited standard bring? 24 November 2017, Prague

Solvency Regulation in the UAE: A Benchmark and Impact Study

VALUATIONS OF GENERAL INSURANCE CLAIMS

Gas storage: overview and static valuation

Financial Accounting s Conceptual Foundations

LICAT Overview. December 1 st, Jacques Tremblay, FCIA, FSA, MAAA

Caradoc Townsend Mutual Insurance Company. Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2018

Review of Registered Charites Compliance Rates with Annual Reporting Requirements 2016

LPFA Monthly Solvency Report as at 29 September 2017 Final Month End Data

Transcription:

GI ROC Working Party GIRO 21 Celtic Manor, Newport, Wales Reserving for Solvency II What you need to be doing NOW! 14 October 21 21 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

GI ROC Working Party Members Naomi Al-Seffar Ayuk Akoh-Arrey Chris Boss Matt Brocklehurst Elizabeth Cabrera Jeff Courchene Susan Dreksler Kendra Felisky (Chair) Jerome Kirk Vincent Robert Seema Thaper Mat Wheatley Matt Wilson 1

GI ROC Working Party Reserving under Solvency II Working party has a wide remit looking at practical implications of: Risk Margins Cashflows Reinsurance Process Provisions Uncertainty Validation Expenses Reporting Data Segmentation TP governance Communication 2

Contents 1 Process 2 Segmentation 3 Changes in Best Estimate valuation 4 Priorities 3

Process the old way U/w, claims, reinsurance Data Actuarial estimates Management estimates Booked Booked provisions decided by management. 21 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk 4

Process under Solvency II U/w, claims, reinsurance Capital modelling Management input Data Actuarial estimates SII TP Booked provisions for Solvency II determined by the actuary. 21 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk 5

Process under Solvency II and IFRS Phase II? U/w, claims, reinsurance Capital modelling Management input Data Actuarial estimates SII TP Booked provisions for Solvency II determined by the actuary. 21 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk 6

Process Solvency II vs IFRS Phase II Solvency II IFRS Free assets Equity SCR Residual margin* Risk margin Risk margin Assets Discounted probability weighted future cashflows Technical provisions UPR Claims: Discounted probability weighted fulfilment cashflows * Residual margin is set to avoid a Day 1 gain 21 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk 7

Process Solvency II vs IFRS Phase II The principal areas of difference Composition Premium reserves Risk Margin Discount rate Profit recognition Expenses Segmentation 21 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk 8

Process Key changes 21 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk 9

Contents 1 Process 2 Segmentation 3 Changes in Best Estimate valuation 4 Priorities 1

Segmentation Article 8 - Segmentation Insurance and reinsurance undertakings shall segment their insurance and reinsurance obligations into homogeneous risk groups, and as a minimum by lines of business, when calculating their technical provisions. Level 2 Implementing Measures further introduce by currency Emphasis remains on homogeneous risk groups ensures calculations at the right level need to consider credibility May be similar to current splits of business Results can be allocated or aggregated to higher or lower levels as appropriate Consider link with internal model classes for risk margin calculation 11

Segmentation QIS5 Technical Specifications and Spreadsheet Structure Data collection for claims provision Step 1: Gross and Ceded separately Gross Step 2: Split by LoB Step 3: Split by geographical region LoB 1 Region 1 LoB 2 Region 2 Currency 1 Ceded Region n Currency 2 Methodology close to Gross LoB n Region 1 Region 2 Region n Currency n Step 4: Split by currency Currency 1 Currency 2 Currency n Currency 1 Currency 2 Currency n 12

Contents 1 Process 2 Segmentation 3 Changes in Best Estimate valuation 4 Priorities 13

What will Reserving look like under Solvency II? Technical Provisions Claims Provisions (pertaining to earned business) Premium Provisions (pertaining to unearned business- not UPR!) Risk Margin (calculated based on Cost of Capital Method) The starting point continues to be the actuarial estimate. The actuarial and statistical methods to calculate technical provisions should be proportionate to the nature, scale and complexity of the risks supported by the undertaking. 14

Technical Provisions Cross Wethe Can! Bridge! From UK GAAP to Solvency 2 Yes UPR 1% of unearned written premium Removal of any margins (implicit or explicit) Risk Margin All expenses not just ULAE Future premium income ULAE on earned claims RI Bad Debt on Earned Claims Reserve Earned Claims Reserves RI Bad Debt on ALL claims Unearned claims on unincepted legally obligated business Future Premium on written and unincepted legally obligated business Uncertainty Allowance (incl Binary Events) Items expected to reduce technical provisions Items expected to increase technical provisions RI Bad Debt Binary Events Allowance Uncertainty allowance Unearned Claims Unincepted business Unearned Claims Written Business Key UK GAAP Technical Provisions elements Expenses Future premium (NB reduces premium provision) Unearned claims on written business Impact of discounting ALL items Risk Margin Solvency II Claims provisions Solvency II Premium provisions Earned Claims Reserves 15

Technical Provisions Removal From UK of GAAP any to margins Solvency 2 Yes We Can! UPR 1% of unearned written premium Removal of any margins (implicit or explicit) Risk Margin All expenses not just ULAE Future premium income ULAE on earned claims RI Bad Debt on Earned Claims Reserve Earned Claims Reserves RI Bad Debt on ALL claims Unearned claims on unincepted legally obligated business Future Premium on written and unincepted legally obligated business Uncertainty Allowance (incl Binary Events) Items expected to reduce technical provisions Items expected to increase technical provisions RI Bad Debt Binary Events Allowance Uncertainty allowance Unearned Claims Unincepted business Unearned Claims Written Business Key UK GAAP Technical Provisions elements Expenses Future premium (NB reduces premium provision) Unearned claims on written business Impact of discounting ALL items Risk Margin Solvency II Claims provisions Solvency II Premium provisions Earned Claims Reserves 16

Best Estimate Removal of any margins Removal of any margins (implicit or explicit) The best estimate should correspond to the probability weighted average of future cash-flows taking account of the time value of money. Therefore the best estimate calculation should allow for the uncertainty in the future cash-flows BUT allowance for uncertainty does not suggest that additional margins should be included within the best estimate. That means: No explicit buffer Claims provision based on realistic assumptions Premiums provision should account for any profits or losses on unexpired risk How does one factor in management judgement? 17

Best Estimate Premium provisions Future premiujm Unearned claims on written business Gross (and Reinsurer s share) UPR does not exist anymore under Solvency II. It is replaced by the premium provision: Claims related to unexpired risk for existing contracts. Less future premium cashflows. The premium provision amount may be negative. 18

Release of profit on UPR unearned written premium Best Estimate Premium provision Assume 1st July 1-year policy with uniform risk Unearned claims on written business Claim ratio = 72% Total Premium = 1, payable by 4 on day 1 and 3 equal payments of 2 in the 1st month of the quarter Payments are paid in the month following the end of the quarter of occurrence No discounting / risk margins Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Total (4) (2) (2) (2) (1) 18 18 18 18 72 Cash-flow (4) (2) (2) (2) 18 (28) Premium Earning (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (1) Premiums Paid claims 19

Release of profit on UPR unearned written premium Best Estimate Unearned business Unearned claims on written business UK GAAP Approach Solvency II Approach Assets Cash Receivables 82 42 4 Assets Cash 42 42 Liabilities OS claims UPR 68 18 (on earned) 5 Liabilities Claim reserve Premium provision 14 18 (4) = (4) + 36 Available Profit 14 Available Profit 28 Cash flows Past Future Total Main observations Premiums (6) (4) (1) Provisions reduce drastically Paid claims 18 54 72 Net cash-flow (42) 14 (28) Premium provision is negative Premium earning (5) (5) (1) No concept of non-monetary items All profit taken year 1 2

Best Estimate Future Premium Written unincepted business Unearned claims on unincepted legally obligated business Extract from DOC 25/9 A reinsurance or insurance contract should be initially recognized by insurance or reinsurance undertakings as an existing contract when the undertaking becomes a party of the contract.. the undertaking becomes a party of the contract when the contract between undertaking and policyholder is legally formalized. In particular, the recognition may take place earlier than the inception of insurance cover, because from an economic point of view the obligation to provide cover already exists and has an economic value before the inception. Move to a legal obligations basis big change will include 1/1 renewals for a 31/12 valuation need to consider notice periods on binders? Data implications are significant Future premiums means provisions for these will often be negative 21

Best Estimate Discounting ALL items Impact of discounting ALL items The best estimate should correspond to the probability weighted average of future cash-flows taking account of the time value of money. Need to create cash-flows gross of reinsurance and for reinsurers share separately. Segmentation by line of business and currency. Need to create cash-flows for: Claims payments (out) Expenses LAE, ULAE, overheads/admin, commissions (out) Future premiums (in) Receivable for salvage and subrogation (in) Need then to discount these future cash-flows using the risk-free term structure for the relevant currency. 22

Best Estimate Cashflows, where to start? Impact of discounting ALL items Creating deterministic cashflows Is this the best starting point? What if you don't use triangles/chain ladder for reserving? Can you just start with triangles? Large losses will need separate consideration Actuaries should take care to avoid over-smoothing in their analyses Cashflows need to be the mean cashflows Data Is suitable data available? What data should we be collecting now? Actuaries should consider the level of granularity they require to produce estimates that meet statistical quality standards of SII 23

Best Estimate Reserving versus capital modeling Impact of discounting ALL items The technical provisions need to be consistent with the internal model. This creates a number of challenges. Earned reserves (claims provision) What methods make it easiest to ensure consistency between point estimates and means of stochastic distributions. Consideration of correlations. Unearned reserves (premium provision) Typically the remit of the capital actuaries Need input from planning also 24

Best Estimate Uncertainty Allowance (incl Binary Events) Uncertainty allowance Binary Events What are they? Health Nanotechnology Aspartame Electro magnetic fields GM crops Nuclear waste Why bother? Best estimate = Probability weighted average of all possible future cash flows Current methods probably underestimate a true mean Data / parameterisation Unknown unknowns Events Social Environmental Legislative/ Political Meteor strike Mega Volcanoes Global warming Polluters Step change in court rulings (e.g. Ogden) the greater good e.g. asbestos, US Healthcare Margin used for binary events Binary events fill part of the gap between the current approach and the requirements Premium provisions Cat & latent loadings be consistent with pricing assumptions Claims provisions Latent loadings Other Contract wording etc 25

Best Estimate Uncertainty allowance Binary Events Uncertainty Allowance (incl Binary Events) Methodology: Deterministic projection: Estimate mean binary outcome Explicitly adjust claims reserve Stochastic projection Select distributions (frequency/severity) for binary loss and model cashflows Model cashflows for standard losses in normal way (e.g. bootstrapping) Combine cashflows from two projections Results: Deterministic projection: Binary allowance can be reduced to simple percentage increase in reserves Stochastic projection Required increase in reserve is clouded by effect of discounting / reinsurance 26

Best Estimate RI Bad Debt on ALL claims RI Bad Debt on ALL claims This should approximate the expected present value of the losses in the event of default weighted by the probability of default for each counterparty. It should take into account default events during the whole run-off period of the recoverables (i.e. it is not sufficient to multiply the expected recoveries by the probability of default over the current year). It should be calculated separately for each line of business and separately for premiums provision and claims provision. The aim is to get an expected probability of default and loss given default for each future time period for each line of business and each counterparty (or at least each rating group). 27

Best Estimate All expenses not just ULAE All Expenses Expenses cashflows incurred servicing existing policies during their lifetime, i.e. should include, for example: Acquisition expenses Claims management expenses Unallocated expenses (ULAE would be part of it) Investment management expenses They should be allocated between lines of business, gross/ceded, currency and between earned and unearned exposure. Expenses cashflows should be calculated on the assumption of an ongoing business basis and assumptions should be made for inflation. The actuarial function needs to document the rationale for the allowance for expenses in the technical provision calculations. 28

Best Estimate Validation and other issues Impact of discounting ALL items Validation How do we validate / justify initial approach? How do we monitor, validate and apply P&L attribution on an ongoing basis? What will be acceptable to the regulator, and how will this line up with model validation? Other issues Does bootstrapping cover all areas of risk Is your finance department ready for this? Reinsurance Groups 29

Risk Margin Risk Margin Amount required to ensure the value of the technical provisions is increased from the discounted best estimate to an amount equivalent to the theoretical level required to transfer the obligations to another insurance undertaking Where the best estimate and risk margins are calculated separately, risk margins should calculated using a cost of capital approach This is a new concept compared to current practice and it is envisaged that RM will be calculated to some extent using suitable simplifications Should not be calculated separately for premium and claim provisions Should be defined net of reinsurance only. For IM can be calc gross and RI separately Cost of Capital rate is a long term rate above the risk free rate, not adjusted for market cycle 6% appears the magic number 3

Technical Provisions From UK GAAP to Solvency 2 You did it! UPR 1% of unearned written premium ULAE on earned claims RI Bad Debt on Earned Claims Reserve Earned Claims Reserves Removal of any margins (implicit or explicit) Risk Margin All expenses not just ULAE Release of profit on UPR unearned written premium RI Bad Debt on ALL claims Unearned claims on unincepted legally obligated business Future Premium on written and unincepted legally obligated business Uncertainty Allowance (incl Binary Events) Items expected to reduce technical provisions Items expected to increase technical provisions RI Bad Debt Binary Events Allowance Uncertainty allowance Unearned Claims Unincepted business Unearned Claims Written Business Key UK GAAP Technical Provisions elements Expenses Future premium (NB reduces premium provision) Unearned claims on written business Impact of discounting ALL items Risk Margin Solvency II Claims provisions Solvency II Premium provisions Earned Claims Reserves 31

Contents 1 Process 2 Segmentation 3 Changes in Best Estimate valuation 4 Priorities 32

Priorities 33

Conclusions Technical Provisions are changing significantly Both quantitative and qualitative elements Don t underestimate the work involved Dry run / QIS5 are HERE! Read the guidance & plan your work now Remember it is an evolving area so be flexible Look out for updates from the WP whenever you can There s more to come And if you have ideas or comments then let us know 34

Questions or comments? 21 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk 35