What Determines Firms Decision to Formalize?

Similar documents
What Determines Firms Decisions to Formalize?

What Determines Firms Decisions to Formalize?

Private sector valuation of public sector experience: The role of education and geography *

On Minimum Wage Determination

Economic Development and Subjective Well-Being. An in-depth study based on VARHS 2012

FEMALE PARTICIPATION IN THE LABOUR MARKET AND GOVERNMENT POLICY IN KENYA: IMPLICATIONS FOR

IJSE 41,5. Abstract. The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at

David Newhouse Daniel Suryadarma

Public-private sector pay differential in UK: A recent update

Núria Rodríguez-Planas, City University of New York, Queens College, and IZA (with Daniel Fernández Kranz, IE Business School)

ANALYSIS OF THE LINKAGE BETWEEN DOMESTIC REVENUE MOBILIZATION AND SOCIAL SECTOR SPENDING

Depression Babies: Do Macroeconomic Experiences Affect Risk-Taking?

Online Appendix for Does mobile money affect saving behavior? Evidence from a developing country Journal of African Economies

Does Participation in Microfinance Programs Improve Household Incomes: Empirical Evidence From Makueni District, Kenya.

*9-BES2_Logistic Regression - Social Economics & Public Policies Marcelo Neri

Mobile Financial Services for Women in Indonesia: A Baseline Survey Analysis

Can Information Change Personal Retirement Savings? Evidence from Social Security Benefits Statement Mailings. Susan Payne Carter William Skimmyhorn

Why Do Firms Evade Taxes? The Role of Information Sharing and Financial Sector Outreach The Journal of Finance. Thorsten Beck Chen Lin Yue Ma

Development Economics: Microeconomic issues and Policy Models

How are social ties formed? : Interaction of neighborhood and individual immobility.

Trading and Enforcing Patent Rights. Carlos J. Serrano University of Toronto and NBER

Online Appendices Practical Procedures to Deal with Common Support Problems in Matching Estimation

DYNAMICS OF URBAN INFORMAL

Shirking and Employment Protection Legislation: Evidence from a Natural Experiment

Decentralization, Democratization, and Public Service Delivery


AUTHOR ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Returns to education in Australia

Real effects of the Sovereign Debt Crisis in Europe: Evidence from Syndicated Loans

Discussion of Foreign Currency Debt and Macroeconomic Volatility by Anton Korinek. Romain Ranciere PSE

Does It Pay Firms to Register for Taxes? The Impact of Formality on Firm Profitability

Roads, Labor Markets, and Human Capital

The Influence of Ill Health on Chronic and Transient Poverty: Evidence from Uganda. David Lawson University of Manchester. CPRC Working Paper No 41

Efficiency Wages and the Economic Effects of the Minimum Wage: Evidence from a Low-Wage Labour Market. Andreas Georgiadis

AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF GENDER WAGE DIFFERENTIALS IN URBAN CHINA

AN ANALYSIS OF THE DEGREE OF DIVERSIFICATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE Zheng-Feng Guo, Vanderbilt University Lingyan Cao, University of Maryland

Which domestic benefit from FDI? Evidence from selected African countries

Retirement and Unexpected Health Shocks

Web Appendix Figure 1. Operational Steps of Experiment

Poverty and Witch Killing

Sarah K. Burns James P. Ziliak. November 2013

Household Use of Financial Services

Demand for Environmental Quality in Kathmandu, Nepal: Evidence from Knowledge, Attitude, Behavior and Choice Experiment Survey

THE EFFECT OF FINANCIAL POLICY REFORM ON POVERTY REDUCTION

Economic Growth and Convergence across the OIC Countries 1

In Debt and Approaching Retirement: Claim Social Security or Work Longer?

Understanding the underlying dynamics of the reservation wage for South African youth. Essa Conference 2013

Deleveraging and Consumption in a Highly Indebted Property Market

How road quality investments boost economic activity and welfare: Evidence from Indonesia s Highways

Mortgage Rates, Household Balance Sheets, and Real Economy

Migration Responses to Household Income Shocks: Evidence from Kyrgyzstan

Mining closures, gender, and employment reallocations: the case of UK coal mines

Dan Breznitz Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto, 1 Devonshire Place, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3K7 CANADA

The Performance of Alternative Monetary Regimes

Gender wage gaps in formal and informal jobs, evidence from Brazil.

Firm Manipulation and Take-up Rate of a 30 Percent. Temporary Corporate Income Tax Cut in Vietnam

Peer Effects in Retirement Decisions

Closing routes to retirement: how do people respond? Johannes Geyer, Clara Welteke

The determinants of household poverty in Sri Lanka: 2006/2007

Analyzing the Determinants of Project Success: A Probit Regression Approach

Do firms benefit from quality-related training activities?

For Online Publication Additional results

Whither Latin American Capital Markets?

Depositor Runs and Financial Literacy by Kim

Chinese Trade Reforms, Market Access and Foreign Competition

Access to Credit and Women Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Bangladesh. M. Jahangir Alam Chowdhury University of Dhaka.

BANK LEVY INCIDENCE AND BANK MARKET POWER

Determinants of Female Labour Force Participation Dynamics: Evidence From 2000 & 2007 Indonesia Family Life Survey

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Statistics and Information Department

Access to Retirement Savings and its Effects on Labor Supply Decisions

Does Inequality Reduce Happiness? Evidence from the States of the USA from the 1970s to the 1990s

The Short- and Medium-Run Effects of Computerized VAT Invoices on Tax Revenues in China (Very Preliminary)

The Impact of a $15 Minimum Wage on Hunger in America

Equality and Fertility: Evidence from China

Input Tariffs, Speed of Contract Enforcement, and the Productivity of Firms in India

Canadian Labour Market and Skills Researcher Network

Happy Voters. Exploring the Intersections between Economics and Psychology. Federica Liberini 1, Eugenio Proto 2 Michela Redoano 2.

Get in with a Foreigner: Consumer Trust in Domestic and Foreign Banks

Appendix B: Methodology and Finding of Statistical and Econometric Analysis of Enterprise Survey and Portfolio Data

Does Expanding Health Insurance Beyond Formal-Sector Workers Encourage Informality? Measuring the Impact of Mexico s Seguro Popular

THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL STABILITY REPORT S WARNINGS ON THE LOAN TO VALUE RATIO. Andrés Alegría Rodrigo Alfaro Felipe Córdova Central Bank of Chile

Table IA.1 CEO Pay-Size Elasticity and Increased Labor Demand Panel A: IPOs Scaled by Full Sample Industry Average

The Effect of Community-Based Programs on Elephant Populations in Africa

The Labor Market Consequences of Adverse Financial Shocks

Import Competition and Household Debt

Methodological Experiment on Measuring Asset Ownership from a Gender Perspective (MEXA) An EDGE-LSMS-UBOS Collaboration

Online Appendix Long-Lasting Effects of Socialist Education

Effects of working part-time and full-time on physical and mental health in old age in Europe

Payment Choice and International Trade: Theory and Evidence from Cross-country Firm Level Data

Supporting information for. Mainstream or niche? Vote-seeking incentives and the programmatic strategies of political parties

Do Domestic Chinese Firms Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment?

INTERMEDIATE MACROECONOMICS

The effect of changes to Local Housing Allowance on rent levels

The causal effects of an industrial policy

Electricity Provision and Tax Mobilization in Africa

Investment Platforms Market Study Interim Report: Annex 7 Fund Discounts and Promotions

Bargaining with Grandma: The Impact of the South African Pension on Household Decision Making

Employment and Income Generation in Informal Sector: A Case of Street Vendors of Kathmandu Nepal

How would an expansion of IDA reduce poverty and further other development goals?

A Dynamic Structural Model of Contraceptive Use and Employment Sector Choice for Women in Indonesia

Transcription:

What Determines Firms Decision to Formalize? Empirical Evidence from Rural Indonesia Neil McCulloch Günther G. Schulze Janina Voss IDS, Univ. of Sussex/ UK Univ. of Freiburg/ Germany Fourth IZA/ World Bank Conference on Employment and Development Bonn, May 5, 2009

Motivation Informal sector is large most firms, much employment, particularly of the poor We don t know much about the pattern of formalization (who is formal and who isn t) We don t know much about the determinants of formalization (costs and benefits and how they vary by firm and owner characteristics) 05.05.2009 Formalization in Rural Indonesia 2

Structure of the Talk 1. Introduction 2. Our Data: The Rural Investment Climate Survey in Indonesia 3. The Empirical Approach 4. Costs and Benefits of Formalization 5. Who Goes Formal? 6. Concluding Remarks 05.05.2009 Formalization in Rural Indonesia 3

The Rural Investment Climate Survey (RICS) Survey in the field early 2006, data refer to 2005 Household, enterprise, community questionaires 2461 micro and small firms micro (1 4 empl., 2198 firms), small (5 19 empl.) Six districts throughout rural Indonesia, 149 villages Enterprises: 1757 household, 618 standalone, 146 listed Sector: 54 % trading, 35 % services, 11% manufacturing Manager/Owner: 63% male, 37 % female 05.05.2009 Formalization in Rural Indonesia 4

Business Licensing in Indonesia Complicated, unclear process, mainly at district level Required licenses: Tax identification number (NPWP) Physical licenses: Construction/building license (IMB) Sectoral licenses: trade license (SIUP), industrial registration (TDI) Business registration (TDP) Only 2 % of firms are fully licensed, 23% have at least one license. 05.05.2009 Formalization in Rural Indonesia 5

Cost Benefit Approach Firms decide to get licensed if benefits > costs Avg. Costs: 550,000 IDR, 11 days per lic. Benefits: Taxes, bribes, sales, access to credit, government contracts? Do benefits depend on firm characteristics? Stylized facts: Licensed firms are larger and older, they pay more taxes, bribes, have better access to credit and sell more to the govnmt. Endogeneity problem! 05.05.2009 Formalization in Rural Indonesia 6

Econometric Approach Endogeneity problem e.g., do firms pay higher taxes due to the license or do high tax payers decide to get a license to reduce the tax burden? IV approach, instrument: community averages for licensing Interaction with firm characteristics to capture firm heterogeneity 05.05.2009 Formalization in Rural Indonesia 7

1. Taxes 05.05.2009 (1) OLS (2) 2SLS (3) 2SLS licensed 1.045-1.423-3.760 (0.381)*** (0.581)** (1.116)*** L*qsales_2 1.147 (0.944) L*qsales_3 2.293 (1.184)* L*qsales_4 2.684 (0.995)*** L*qsales_5 2.997 (1.445)** education 0.342 0.388 0.411 (0.060)*** (0.096)*** (0.089)*** age 0.013 0.021 0.022 (0.011) (0.012)* (0.011)** female -0.404-0.359-0.389 (0.228)* (0.213)* (0.193)** Ind_ethn -0.189-0.374-0.470 (0.270) (0.251) (0.257)* chinese 0.826 0.705 0.327 (0.636) (0.880) (0.910) islam -0.469-0.587-0.676 (0.317) (0.345)* (0.334)** employee 0.105 0.099 0.082 (0.036)*** (0.045)** (0.044)* lnsales 0.251 0.347 (0.083)*** (0.059)*** lnfasset 0.087 0.089 0.092 (0.037)** (0.031)*** (0.028)*** Firm age -0.021-0.010-0.009 (0.015) (0.015) (0.014) villtax 0.804 0.819 (0.062)*** (0.061)*** Constant -3.056-3.950-0.572 (1.196)** (1.467)*** (1.357) Observations 1901 1782 1782 R-squared 0.33 0.42 0.43 Robust standard errors in parentheses Regression contains district dummies * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1% Add. Controls for Sectors, Rural/Urban, Owner residing in village, district dummies 8

1. Taxes Licensed firms pay less taxes! This effect is smaller for larger firms. It is stronger for rural firms (not shown). Evidence for discrimination (religion, ethnicity). Controls: Large firms pay more. Village effects 05.05.2009 Formalization in Rural Indonesia 9

2. Informal payments (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) No instruments License instrumented amount Did pay amount Did pay amount Did pay licensed 0.190 0.109 1.968 1.457 8.225 2.150 (0.307) (0.155) (0.958)** (0.464)*** (2.697)*** (1.445) L*lnsales 0.902 0.053 (0.234)*** (0.123) Resides in vill 0.551 0.088 1.165 0.664 1.417 0.662 (0.308)* (0.160) (0.447)*** (0.208)*** (0.415)*** (0.211)*** indethn 0.042 0.011 0.182 0.015 0.303 0.023 (0.338) (0.139) (0.308) (0.170) (0.282) (0.171) chinese 0.755 0.471 1.244 0.512 1.399 0.635 (0.621) (0.411) (0.705)* (0.529) (0.565)** (0.500) lnsales 0.070 0.174 0.170 0.130 0.394 0.111 (0.089) (0.043)*** (0.095)* (0.043)*** (0.118)*** (0.060)* lnfasset 0.045 0.017 0.079 0.011 0.080 0.010 (0.034) (0.017) (0.033)** (0.017) (0.031)*** (0.017) villcorrpt2 0.271 0.721 0.337 0.724 (0.227) (0.070)*** (0.212) (0.070)*** employee 0.065 0.073 0.071 (0.028)** (0.033)** (0.036)** Constant 3.579 1.474 2.056 0.747 0.502 1.818 (1.390)** (0.722)** (1.492) (0.783) (1.463) (0.801)** License Neighborhood effect discrimination Size effect Village effect Obs. 1901 1901 1782 1782 1782 1782 05.05.2009 10 Robust standard errors in parentheses Additional controls for sector, rural/urban, age of firm, female, islam, education, age, district dummies

2. Informal Payments Licensing reduces probability of paying bribes! It reduces amount of bribes as well! Esp. Large firms profit from reduction in corruption payments Controls: Owner residing in the village pays less bribes Larger firms pay more and are more likely to Chinese pay more, village effects 05.05.2009 Formalization in Rural Indonesia 11

3. Total Revenue Additional controls: sectors, rural/urban, female, Chinese, Islam, residing in village, district dummies (1) (2) (3) OLS 2SLS Licensed 0.424-0.379-1.226 (0.233)* (0.291) (0.349)*** L*qemployee_2 0.701 (0.594) L*qemployee_3 0.516 (0.502) L*qemployee_4 1.699 (0.465)*** edu 0.084 0.129 0.123 (0.030)*** (0.028)*** (0.027)*** age -0.009-0.005-0.005 (0.003)** (0.005) (0.005) indethn -0.294-0.089-0.108 (0.164)* (0.152) (0.161) qemployee_2 0.120 0.221 0.111 (0.178) (0.148) (0.128) qemployee_3 0.391 0.575 0.502 (0.176)** (0.158)*** (0.194)** qemployee_4 1.364 1.503 1.004 (0.204)*** (0.207)*** (0.287)*** qlnfasset_2-0.179-0.191-0.156 (0.176) (0.156) (0.155) qlnfasset_3-0.267-0.189-0.149 (0.150)* (0.137) (0.135) qlnfasset_4 0.064-0.056-0.013 (0.148) (0.153) (0.160) qlnfasset_5 0.097 0.113 0.137 (0.139) (0.130) (0.130) entagedum_2 0.445 0.436 0.438 (0.107)*** (0.107)*** (0.107)*** entagedum_3 0.434 0.475 0.482 (0.141)*** (0.172)*** (0.166)*** villsales 0.836 0.863 (0.095)*** (0.091)*** Constant 10.630 1.421 1.278 (0.441)*** (1.180) (1.111) Observations 1901 1782 1782 R-squared 0.39 0.45 0.46 Robust standard errors in parentheses Regression contains district dummies Education matters! Firm size Firm age 05.05.2009 * significant at 10%; Formalization ** significant at 5%; in *** Rural significant Indonesia at 1% 12

3. Business Expansion/ Revenue Again: Endogeneity Overall: No effect of formalization on revenue Large firms will gain from formalization, small ones will not. Controls: Factor input (labor matters) Education Firm age 05.05.2009 Formalization in Rural Indonesia 13

4. Further results 1. Access to credit largely unaffected by licenses 2. Access to government contracts: large firms will profit from licensing, no overall effect 05.05.2009 Formalization in Rural Indonesia 14

Determinants of Formality Previous results show which characteristics are associated with lower costs increased benefits. Reduced form Probit of Formality Sales, employment, assets, Sector, rural/urban Female, ethnicity, religion, Chinese 05.05.2009 Formalization in Rural Indonesia 15

Who goes formal? Results More likely: Large firms do (highest quintile in employmt, assets, sales) Chinese (by a third) Better educated owners Less likely Majority ethnicity (by 10%) Owners who live in the village (by 15%) Rural firms (by 15 20%) Cost differences (time, money) do not matter 05.05.2009 Formalization in Rural Indonesia 16

Concluding Remarks The main reason firms go formal is to reduce rent extraction! Firms that are easier targets (large, Chinese, minority ethnicity, out of village) have a bigger incentive to get a license 05.05.2009 Formalization in Rural Indonesia 17

Firms Decision to Formalize Probit: Marginal effects from probit regression on licensed (1) (2) Formalized? qlnsales_2 0.023-0.026 (0.052) (0.045) qlnsales_3-0.010-0.015 (0.051) (0.047) qlnsales_4 0.117 0.103 (0.067)* (0.063) qlnsales_5 0.221 0.161 (0.079)*** (0.074)** qemployee_2 0.048 0.050 (0.044) (0.043) qemployee_4 0.069 0.055 (0.054) (0.051) qemployee_5 0.175 0.087 (0.072)** (0.063) qlnfasset_2 0.106 0.121 (0.068) (0.069)* qlnfasset_3-0.005 0.002 (0.058) (0.061) qlnfasset_4 0.149 0.149 (0.070)** (0.068)** qlnfasset_5 0.206 0.183 (0.069)*** (0.067)*** female -0.022-0.016 (0.036) (0.036) indethn -0.102-0.091 (0.041)** (0.042)** islam -0.083-0.059 (0.084) (0.077) Chinese 0.353 0.379 (0.158)** (0.156)** rural -0.195-0.163 (0.031)*** (0.032)*** meancost 0.000 0.000 (0.000) (0.000) meantime 0.002 0.002 (0.002) (0.002) edu 0.045 edu 0.045 0.045 (0.010)*** (0.010)*** Residing in vill. -0.155-0.155 (0.064)** (0.064)** District dummies yes yes Observations 1851 1682 1682 Robust standard errors in parentheses Regression contains district dummies * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1% Additional controls for sector and district dummies (0.010)*** 05.05.2009 Formalization in Rural Indonesia 18

ADDITIONAL MATERIAL 05.05.2009 Formalization in Rural Indonesia 19

Literature Levenson and Maloney (1998) older and larger firms invest in formality as they have proven to be successful Jäckle and Lee (2003) older and larger firms, Peru Fajnzylnber et al. (2006) quasiexperimental regres. Discont., Brazil, formalized firms have higher revenue, employm., investment McKenzie and Sakho (2006) Bolivia, IV approach formalization increases profits for small firms (2 5 wrks), micor and large firms lose 05.05.2009 Formalization in Rural Indonesia 20

RICS Geographical coverage Labuhan Batu, North Sumatra a plantation area Kutai, East Kalimantan an area rich in mineral resources Barru, South Sulawesi a forest fringe area Malang, East Java a rich agricultural area Badung, Bali a semi urban agglomeration area Sumbawa, NTB a dryland area 05.05.2009 Formalization in Rural Indonesia 21

Mean Size and Enterprise Age formal informal mean number of employees 3.93 2.23 mean of log total sales 11.03 9.92 mean enterprise age 10.77 8.54 05.05.2009 Formalization in Rural Indonesia 22

IV Approach: first stage Sargan test on overidentification passed Strong identification, high F statistic Community characteristics no strong instruments Village w/ high share of licensed firms may perform better, thus have higher benefits. Additional control for village averages for the respective benefit analyzed 05.05.2009 Formalization in Rural Indonesia 23

(1) (2) (4) (5) (6) First Stage IV Estimates Marginal effects from Probit regression on licensed Vill avg licensed 0.562 0.547 0.538 0.582 0.531 (0.086)*** (0.086)*** (0.081)*** (0.084)*** (0.094)*** education 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.037 (0.007)*** (0.007)*** (0.007)*** (0.007)*** (0.008)*** age 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 (0.001)*** (0.001)*** (0.001)*** (0.001)*** (0.001)*** female -0.017-0.017-0.017-0.015-0.016 (0.024) (0.024) (0.023) (0.024) (0.024) Resides in vill. -0.246-0.244-0.247-0.242-0.253 (0.076)*** (0.077)*** (0.074)*** (0.074)*** (0.074)*** indethn -0.085-0.084-0.081-0.085-0.081 (0.058) (0.056) (0.054) (0.055) (0.053) Chinese 0.056 0.048 0.046 0.047 0.049 (0.105) (0.105) (0.100) (0.100) (0.101) Islam -0.043-0.047-0.044-0.049-0.054 (0.046) (0.047) (0.046) (0.047) (0.049) Empl above median 0.085 0.086 0.108 0.087 0.081 (0.046)* (0.046)* (0.041)*** (0.046)* (0.044)* Sales above median 0.044 0.041 0.039 0.044 (0.032) (0.033) (0.033) (0.033) Fixed assets a.med. 0.069 0.070 0.069 0.070 0.068 (0.018)*** (0.018)*** (0.016)*** (0.017)*** (0.018)*** Firm age above med 0.014 0.013 0.017 0.014 0.015 (0.029) (0.029) (0.028) (0.028) (0.028) rural -0.015-0.015-0.011-0.005 0.001 (0.029) (0.028) (0.027) (0.026) (0.027) manufac -0.032-0.033-0.035-0.029-0.028 (0.028) (0.028) (0.028) (0.029) (0.028) service -0.028-0.029-0.037-0.025-0.028 (0.019) (0.019) (0.019)* (0.018) (0.018) bank 0.032 villtax -0.002 05.05.2009 Formalization in Rural Indonesia (0.007) villcorrpt 0.007 (0.012) villsales 0.018 (0.018) villgovs -0.008 (0.004)** villcred 0.104 Observations 1676 1676 1715 1676 1636 Robust standard errors in parentheses Regression contains district dummies * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1% (0.024) (0.056)* 24

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) No instruments License instrumented amount Did pay amount Did pay amount Did pay 2. Informal payments licensed 0.190 0.109 1.968 1.457 8.225 2.150 (0.307) (0.155) (0.958)** (0.464)*** (2.697)*** (1.445) L*lnsales 0.902 0.053 (0.234)*** (0.123) edu 0.014 0.097 0.146 0.008 0.150 0.013 (0.083) (0.042)** (0.091) (0.055) (0.087)* (0.055) age 0.009 0.014 0.013 0.010 0.007 0.010 (0.012) (0.006)** (0.013) (0.007) (0.013) (0.007) female 0.275 0.234 0.396 0.221 0.383 0.229 (0.307) (0.147) (0.307) (0.150) (0.277) (0.150) Resides in vill 0.551 0.088 1.165 0.664 1.417 0.662 (0.308)* (0.160) (0.447)*** (0.208)*** (0.415)*** (0.211)*** indethn 0.042 0.011 0.182 0.015 0.303 0.023 (0.338) (0.139) (0.308) (0.170) (0.282) (0.171) chinese 0.755 0.471 1.244 0.512 1.399 0.635 (0.621) (0.411) (0.705)* (0.529) (0.565)** (0.500) islam 0.291 0.250 0.069 0.235 0.123 0.196 (0.397) (0.286) (0.402) (0.319) (0.372) (0.313) lnsales 0.070 0.174 0.170 0.130 0.394 0.111 (0.089) (0.043)*** (0.095)* (0.043)*** (0.118)*** (0.060)* lnfasset 0.045 0.017 0.079 0.011 0.080 0.010 (0.034) (0.017) (0.033)** (0.017) (0.031)*** (0.017) villcorrpt2 0.271 0.721 0.337 0.724 (0.227) (0.070)*** (0.212) (0.070)*** 05.05.2009 Formalization in Rural Indonesia employee 0.065 0.073 0.071 25

Who goes formal? 1. Licenses affect firms differently The costs and benefits of formality Interacting characteristic cost or benefit sales taxes (+) other levies : outcome stage ( ) sales to government (+) fixed assets other levies : outcome stage ( ) sales to government (+) employees credit ( ) revenue (+) female taxes (+) other levies : selection stage (+) rural taxes ( ) other levies : selection stage ( ) outcome stage (+) manufacturing sector credit ( ) sales to government (+) Ind_ethnicity other levies : selection stage ( ) Chinese sales to government ( ) Islam revenue ( ) other levies: outcome stage (+) 05.05.2009 Formalization in Rural Indonesia 26