UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Similar documents
Case 5:17-cv W Document 1 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA CITY DIVISION

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/30/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 7:18-cv NSR Document 1 Filed 08/23/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED vs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case 1:14-cv TWP-TAB Document 1 Filed 09/09/14 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1

Case: 4:14-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 10/03/14 Page: 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 04/06/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 4:11-cv Document 143 Filed in TXSD on 06/25/13 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:18-cv RM-MEH Document 16 Filed 03/02/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

4:10-cv TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12

Case 3:14-cv HU Document 1 Filed 04/01/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv LTS-DCF Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CASE NO.

Case 4:18-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 01/04/18 Page 1 of 13

Case 2:12-cv RCJ -GWF Document 1 Filed 07/26/12 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/07/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT COMPLAINT

Case 5:14-cv FB-JWP Document 1 Filed 10/16/14 Page 1 of 12

Case 2:18-cv Document 3 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 15

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 05/03/17 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv MKB-RML Document 5 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 14

Case 2:12-cv Document 1 Filed 07/31/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

BEFORE THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION

Case 2:18-cv Document 3 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CIVIL DIVISION

IN CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION. v. CASE NO. COMPLAINT

PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 8:18-cv PWG Document 1 Filed 08/21/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SOUTHERN DIVISION

Defendant. Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 1:14-cv CMA-CBS Document 22 Filed 02/17/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 18

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. Plaintiff, CAUSE NO.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION. Civil Action No. 09-CV-367

Case 4:11-cv Document 79 Filed in TXSD on 06/12/12 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/01/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/17/14 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 1:13-cv PLM Doc #8 Filed 12/23/13 Page 1 of 17 Page ID#44

Case 3:16-cv MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 1

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/11/2015 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case: 3:15-cv wmc Document #: 1 Filed: 01/28/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION

Case 2:16-cv JLR Document 1 Filed 05/13/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:99-cv SCB Document 1 Filed 05/12/1999 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 13

Case 3:17-cv BR Document 1 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 21

Case 1:09-cv Document 1 Filed 10/19/2009 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 18

Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 1 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. v. ) Civil Action No.

Case 1:16-cv SMV-WPL Document 1 Filed 11/23/16 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No.

Case 2:18-cv SJF-AYS Document 3 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 7

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTERAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 05/29/14 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. H MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Case 1:17-cv VSB Document 1 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:13-cv AC Document 1 Filed 03/09/13 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

2:17-cv AJT-SDD Doc # 1 Filed 07/11/17 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/14/18 Page 1 of 11 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/15/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. : : Plaintiffs, : : vs.

Case 3:13-cv M Document 1 Filed 05/23/13 Page 1 of 16 PageID 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:10-cv EEF-JCW Document 1 Filed 02/23/10 Page 1 of 13

Information & Instructions: Response to a Motion To Lift The Automatic Stay Notice and Proof of Service

Case rfn11 Doc 413 Filed 06/30/14 Entered 06/30/14 13:08:22 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:17-cv SDW-LDW Document 1 Filed 06/07/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : :

Courthouse News Service

8:17-cv RFR-FG3 Doc # 1 Filed: 05/26/17 Page 1 of 14 - Page ID # 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. ) Civil Action No. ) CV-03-J-0615-S. Defendants. )

Case 2:18-cv Document 3 Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA COURT FILE NO.: INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Greenbelt Division) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff R.J. Zayed ( Plaintiff or Receiver ), through his undersigned counsel

Case 1:19-cv DLI-SJB Document 1 Filed 02/12/19 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Index No x.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:11-cv WGY Document 168 Filed 01/10/13 Page 1 of 53 IN THE UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 4:10-cv TSH Document 1 Filed 07/09/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 10

Complaint and Jury Demand. Parties. Jurisdiction

Case 1:15-cv N/A Document 2 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Case Document 253 Filed in TXSB on 07/27/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 1:17-cv NYW Document 1 Filed 03/10/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case No.: CLASS ACTION. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES PURSUANT TO THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT, 15 U.S.C. 1692, ET SEQ.

Case 4:11-cv Document 220 Filed in TXSD on 01/25/16 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) PLAINTIFFS CLASS ACTION ) COMPLAINT Plaintiff, ) JURY DEMANDED vs.

Case 9:18-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/05/2018 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE#

I c~~ U.S. DISTRICT COURT

Case 4:16-cv SMR-HCA Document 1 Filed 12/12/16 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. Adv. Proc. No. COMPLAINT

PlainSite. Legal Document. Texas Southern District Court Case No. 4:16-cv Shrieve Chemical Products, Inc. v. Caremoli. Document 1.

IN THE STATE COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

Case Document 2493 Filed in TXSB on 09/04/13 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION. Case No.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

Transcription:

Case 4:10-cv-02422 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/07/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION MICHAEL PHILLIPS, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated, CASE NO. Plaintiffs, v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ENGLOBAL CORPORATION, Defendant. ORIGINAL COMPLAINT SUMMARY 1. ENGlobal Corporation (ENGlobal) violates the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by failing to pay its field service workers overtime. ENGlobal pays these workers using a day rate system. Workers receive a flat amount for each day they work. When they work more than 40 hours in a week, ENGlobal does not pay them overtime. This collective action seeks to recover the unpaid wages and other damages owed to these workers. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. This Court has original subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 29 U.S.C. 216(b). 3. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391 (b) & (c) because ENGlobal resides in this District. 1

Case 4:10-cv-02422 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/07/10 Page 2 of 5 PARTIES 4. Michael Phillips (Phillips) is a former employee of ENGlobal. ENGlobal employed Phillips within the past three years and paid him according to its day rate system. Exhibit 1 is Phillips written consent to this action. 5. Phillips brings this action on behalf of himself and all other ENGlobal workers in the United States who ENGlobal paid according to its day rate system (collectively, the Day Rate Workers). 6. ENGlobal is a corporation headquartered in Houston, Texas. FACTS 7. ENGlobal is an energy engineering and professional services firm. Among other things, ENGlobal provides pipeline inspection services. 8. ENGlobal employs more than 1,000 workers in several U.S. states and Canada. ENGlobal s gross revenues have exceeded $300 million for each of the past three years. 9. ENGlobal is an enterprise engaged in commerce within the meaning of the FLSA. 10. Over the past three years, ENGlobal has employed hundreds of workers including Phillips as Day Rate Workers. 11. ENGlobal pays its Day Rate Workers a day rate for the work they perform. 12. An employer can pay a non-exempt employee on day rate basis provided the employee receives overtime pay for hours worked in excess of 40 in a week. 29 C.F.R. 778.112. The employee s regular rate is determined by totaling all the sums received at such day rates in the workweek and dividing by the total hours worked. The employee is then entitled to extra half-time pay at this rate for all hours worked in excess of 40 in the workweek. 2

Case 4:10-cv-02422 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/07/10 Page 3 of 5 13. ENGlobal knows its Day Rate Workers work more than 40 hours in a week because their timesheets regularly indicate 50 or more hours in a week. 1 Nonetheless, ENGlobal does not pay its Day Rate Workers overtime it merely pays them the daily rate times the number of days worked. 14. By failing to calculate and pay the overtime owed to its Day Rate Workers, ENGlobal violated the FLSA. 15. ENGlobal is well aware of the fact that its payment plan is illegal. ENGlobal has received complaint regarding its overtime pay practices with respect to Day Rate Workers. ENGlobal nonetheless continues to deny its Day Rate Workers overtime pay. 16. ENGlobal s day rate policy affects all the Day Rate Workers in a similar manner. Phillips and the other Day Rate Workers are similarly situated for the purposes of their overtime claims. The collective action class is therefore properly defined as: All Day Rate Workers employed by ENGlobal in the past three years. 2 CAUSE OF ACTION 17. Phillips incorporates the preceding paragraphs by reference. 18. By failing to pay Phillips and the other Day Rate Workers overtime at one-andone-half times their regular rates, ENGlobal violated the FLSA s overtime provisions. 19. ENGlobal owes Phillips and the other Day Rate Workers the difference between the rates actually paid and the proper overtime rate. Because ENGlobal knew, or showed reckless disregard for whether, its pay practices violated the FLSA, ENGlobal owes these wages for at least the past three years. 1 2 definition. If anything, ENGlobal s time sheets understate the hours worked by its Day Rate Workers. Day Rate Worker Clyde Landry filed his own FLSA action and is excluded from this class 3

Case 4:10-cv-02422 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/07/10 Page 4 of 5 20. ENGlobal also owes Phillips and the other Day Rate Workers an amount equal to all unpaid overtime wages as liquidated damages. 21. Phillips and the other Day Rate Workers are entitled to recover all reasonable attorneys fees, costs and expenses incurred in this action. 22. Phillips demands a trial by jury. JURY DEMAND PRAYER Wherefore, Phillips prays for relief as follows: 1. An order allowing this action to proceed as a representative collective action under the FLSA; 2. Judgment awarding Phillips and the other Day Rate Workers all unpaid overtime compensation, liquidated damages, attorneys fees, costs and expenses under the FLSA; 3. Pre- and post-judgment interest at the highest rate allowable by law; and 4. All such other and further relief to which Phillips and the other Day Rate Workers may show themselves to be justly entitled. 4

Case 4:10-cv-02422 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/07/10 Page 5 of 5 Respectfully submitted, BRUCKNER BURCH PLLC /s/ Rex Burch By: Richard J. (Rex) Burch S.D. Tex. No. 21615 Texas Bar No. 24001807 Attorney-In-Charge for Plaintiffs 1415 Louisiana Street, Suite 2125 Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: (713) 877-8788 Telecopier: (713) 877-8065 rburch@brucknerburch.com Derrick G. Earles (La#29570) BRIAN CAUBARREAUX & ASSOCIATES, LLC 144 W. Tunica Drive Marksville, Louisiana 71351 Telephone: (318) 253-0900 Facismile: (318) 253-5666 digger@caubarreaux.com 5