Chapter 6. Transportation Planning and Programming. Chapter 6

Similar documents
APPENDIX I REVENUE PROJECTION AND ASSUMPTIONS

ACTION ELEMENT CONCLUSIONS

Appendix J: MTP Checklist. Introduction

Regional Transportation Plan Checklist (Revised February 2010)

Appendix. G RTP Revenue Assumptions REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

APPENDIX B HIGH PRIORITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM (HPP) ( )

SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. June 30, 2008

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT June 3, 2015 Page 2 of 6 Committee a comparison between the old and new guidelines for Authority reference. Background

CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

Introduction Project Overview How Express Lanes Work 101 Managed Lane Financial Forecast Performance Comparison Ownership Considerations Transit

Transportation Authority of Marin Citizens Oversight Committee

CHAPTER 5 INVESTMENT PLAN

Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission

Performance-Based Planning and Programming Why Is It Important? Northwest TTAP and BIA Symposium Portland, OR March 17, 2015

Measure I Strategic Plan, April 1, 2009 Glossary Administrative Committee Advance Expenditure Agreement (AEA) Advance Expenditure Process

Appendix O. Transportation Financial Background

INVESTING STRATEGICALLY

CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (CTC) GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE STATE HIGHWAY ACCOUNT LOAN PROGRAM (APPROVED BY CTC ON JUNE 15, 2000)

Chapter 9 Financial Considerations. 9.1 Introduction

SKATS FY 2018-FY 2023

CHAPTER 11: Capital Investment Program (CIP) Overview. Program Highlights

CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

VTA Board of Directors: We are forwarding you the following: Letter of support regarding sales tax measure

CHAPTER 4 FINANCIAL STRATEGIES: PAYING OUR WAY

Metropolitan Planning Organizations in North Carolina. Chris Lukasina NCAMPO

SFY 2018 (July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018) Annual Report

Metroplan White Paper

STAFF REPORT Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) Scenario Performance Update for Board Direction

NORTH COUNTY CORRIDOR TRANSPORTATION EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY. Funding Strategy to Further Implement State Route 132 Expressway and North County Corridor

FY Statewide Capital Investment Strategy... asset management, performance-based strategic direction

BINGHAMTON METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY CERTIFICATION NARRATIVE FY 2016

Transportation Planning in the Denver Region

ALL Counties. ALL Districts

Financial Feasibility of Contra Costa County Ferry Service,

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA

Texas Department of Transportation Page 1 of 42 Planning and Development of Transportation Projects

2016 STATE LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM

TRANSIT SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AND RENOVATION. VEHICLES - Caltrain

Prepared by the South East Texas Regional Planning Commission-Metropolitan Planning Organization (SETRPC-MPO) December 6, 2013

IMPERIAL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

Proposition 1B and the Strategic Growth Plan

MTC OVERVIEW OF SB 1 (BEALL AND FRAZIER)

GLOSSARY. At-Grade Crossing: Intersection of two roadways or a highway and a railroad at the same grade.

FY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

SB 83 Additional Vehicle Registration Fee Expenditure Plan (July 15, 2010)

Introduction P O L I C Y D O C U M E N T P A R T 1

FINANCIAL ASSUMPTIONS REPORT

RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

FY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

CALTRAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

INVESTMENT STRATEGIES

APPENDIX 5 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)

HRTPO TTAC RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE HB2 PRIORITIZATION PROCESS

Administration and Projects Committee STAFF REPORT March 1, 2018 Page 2 of 9 Below is a summary of the FY adopted budget and the proposed midy

NASHVILLE AREA MPO TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY

Adopted Biennial Budget

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT April 5, 2017 Page 2 of 2 funds that are being applied toward implementation of the Authority s Priority Development A

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT Guidelines

PENNSYLVANIA S 2017 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FINANCIAL GUIDANCE

Memorandum of Understanding, MOU No. M

Citizens Advisory Committee April 24, 2013

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 16, 2016

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING PROCEDURES FOR STIP AND TIP MODIFICATIONS

FY 2017 Rural Transportation Planning Work Program SCOPE OF WORK

Items in this PDF version of the FY 2018 and FY 2019 Proposed Budget can be found using one of the following methods:

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

January 26, 2010 File Number

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Pennsylvania Department of Transportation s Statewide Procedures for STIP and TIP Modifications

IMPERIAL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

1 R E G I O N A L M O B I L I T Y P L A N

Alameda CTC Mass Transit Program Implementation Guidelines

Working with Proportionate Fair-Share

Working with Proportionate Fair-Share

CAPITAL PROGRAM COMMITTEE AGENDA

SFY 2015 Annual Report

AGENDA CITIZEN S TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE/ SOCIAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COUNCIL (CTAC/SSTAC)

4.A.14-2


Final FY OWP May2013

CAPITAL PROGRAM COMMITTEE AGENDA

WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN FINANCIAL PLAN. Technical Report 47 May 2007 DAVIS MORGAN SALT LAKE TOOELE WEBER

Technical Report No. 4. Revenue and Costs

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AGENDA

Lehigh Valley Transportation Study s Procedures for Transportation Improvement Program Revisions

Additionally, the UPWP serves as a source for the following information:

Transportation Development Act. Local Transportation Fund CLAIM MANUAL FY 2017/18

Butte County Association of Governments. Board of Directors Meeting

Regional Connector Transit Corridor Draft Environmental Impact Statement/ Draft Environmental Impact Report APPENDIX HH FINANCIAL ANALYSIS REPORT

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority

Rule #1: Procedure for Distribution of Revenues for Transportation Services for Seniors and the Disabled

Page 2 of 9 project costs are included in the budget consistent with the adopted Measure C and Measure J Strategic Plans. Below is a summary of the FY

Agenda Item No. 6d January 27, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Laura C. Kuhn, Interim City Manager

Transportation Trust Fund Overview

Capital Improvement Projects

Public Works and Development Services

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

Congestion Management Process. Prepared by: Ghyabi & Associates, Inc.

Imposing a Transactions and Use Tax to be Administered by the State Board of Equalization

Transcription:

Chapter 6 Planning and ming Chapter 6 73

Chapter 6 Planning and ming VTA prepares a variety of transportation planning and programming documents that impact Santa Clara County s future mobility. Planning documents are typically long-term in nature and incorporate a vision for the future. ming documents identify which planned projects will be funded through a particular revenue source in the near term. Most transportation capital improvement projects must be listed in a long-range plan before they can be included in a programming document for federal or state transportation funding. VTA s SRTP Short Range Transit Plan (10 Years) Local VTA s Strategic Plan (10 Years) VTA s Countywide Plan (30 Years) Regional MTC s RTP Regional Plan (25 Years) Federal U.S. DOT s approval through FHWA and FTA VTA s CIP Capital (7 Years) MTC s TIP Federal (4 Years) MTC s RTIP Regional (5 Years) Caltrans ITIP Interregional (5 Years) CTC s STIP State (5 Years) Planning Documents describe all potential future projects for the long term. ming Documents list projects ready for funding in the near term. ming Documents s may list only those projects that are already included in related Planning Documents. 74

Planning Documents Planning and ming VTA produces the long-range, multimodal, Countywide Plan for Santa Clara County, called Valley Plan (VTP). The current version of this document is VTP 2035. This 25-year plan puts forth a comprehensive and balanced blueprint of actions designed to improve the multimodal transportation system and the quality of life in Santa Clara County. Chapter 6 In general, a Countywide Plan consists of the following three elements: (1) a policy element, which articulates a vision and a series of policy principles that guide the evolution of the multimodal transportation system in the county over the timeframe of the plan; (2) a financial element, which consists of estimates of how much funding should be available for transportation purposes from all federal, state and local sources over the life of the plan; and (3) an action element, which presents the multimodal transportation capital improvement projects that would be funded during the plan s time period based on the estimates of available revenues. The Countywide Plan is updated every four years, and provides the basis for many other important planning and programming documents. The Metropolitan Commission (MTC) prepares the Regional Plan (RTP) for the nine-county San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland Bay Area. It is a multimodal blueprint that guides the development of the region s transportation system over a 25-year period. The RTP is structured similar to a Countywide Plan except that pursuant to SB 375 (Steinberg), which was enacted into law in 2008, it must contain a sustainable communities strategy in addition to a policy, financial and action element. Under SB 375, the sustainable communities strategy must consist of development patterns and transportation measures that are designed to achieve regional greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets that are provided by the California Air Resources Board (CARB).The RTP is updated every four years as required by federal and state law. The RTP must be fiscally constrained, meaning the total cost of the transportation capital improvement projects listed in the document cannot exceed the amount of funds projected to be available to the region over the 25-year time period. VTA s Countywide Plan serves as the basis for Santa Clara County s element of the Bay Area s RTP. VTA s Strategic Plan serves as the umbrella policy document for the organization and provides a foundation for the development of its budget, plans and programs. It articulates VTA s vision and mission, outlines a series of goals and policy principles that support the vision and mission statements, and establishes specific strategies and performance measures for assessing progress toward achieving the goals and policy principles. VTP 2035 includes an update to VTA s Strategic Plan. For more detailed information about VTA s Strategic Plan, please see Chapter 1, Santa Clara Valley Authority. 75

As a public transit operator, VTA is required to prepare a Short-Range Transit Plan (SRTP) every two years. However, as a result of a new MTC requirement, public transit operators in the Bay Area must prepare a mini SRTP during the years in between the full SRTPs. In general, the SRTP describes VTA s ongoing public transit planning and development activities over a 10-year period. The Bay Area SRTPs, including VTA s, support the projects included in both the RTP prepared by MTC and the Countywide Plan. In addition, MTC uses them to develop regional transit capital programming documents that form the basis for federal and state funding decisions. Furthermore, both MTC and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) use SRTPs as the detailed justification required for awarding operating and capital grants to VTA and the other Bay Area public transit operators. In general, VTA s SRTP contains information regarding: (1) VTA s history and governance structure; (2) VTA s organizational structure; (3) the elements of VTA s existing public transit system; and (4) VTA s 10-year transit operating plan, capital program and accompanying financial plans. As the designated congestion management agency (CMA) for Santa Clara County, VTA is responsible for preparing the county s Congestion Management (CMP). The CMP is a comprehensive and multifaceted program spelled out in state law that is designed to enhance the linkage between transportation and landuse planning. Updated every two years, the CMP establishes performance standards for public transit and roadway facilities, and sets up a process for determining whether local jurisdictions are meeting those standards. It also analyzes the impact of local land-use decisions on the countywide transportation system. For more information about the various elements of the CMP, please see Chapter 5, Congestion Management. 76 In its role as the designated CMA for Santa Clara County, VTA may also prepare a Countywide Deficiency Plan (CDP). The CDP addresses level-of-service deficiencies on the county s roadway system. Under the CDP, VTA may develop a set of programs and actions to improve the level of service on Santa Clara County s roadway system, and/or provide multimodal improvements to mitigate impacts to the transportation systems resulting from new development. In addition, local jurisdictions may prepare citywide, areawide or local (intersection level) Deficiency Plans. In its role as the CMA, VTA has established Guidelines for Preparing Deficiency Plans, and must approve any Deficiency Plans prepared by local jurisdictions within Santa Clara County.

ming Document Planning and ming VTA prepares a Capital (CIP) as part of the CMP. The CIP is a sevenyear program of projects designed to improve mobility within Santa Clara County and to mitigate the impacts of local land-use decisions on the transportation system. The CIP must conform to federal and state air quality requirements. It may include projects that will increase the capacity of the multimodal transportation system. It also may include safety, maintenance and rehabilitation projects that do not enhance system capacity, but are necessary to preserve the investment in existing facilities. Before a project can be included in the CIP, it must be listed in the Countywide Plan. The CIP is updated every two years as part of the CMP. For more information on the CIP, please see Chapter 5, Congestion Management. Chapter 6 The Regional (RTIP), which is prepared by MTC for the Bay Area, is a list of transportation capital improvement projects designed to improve mobility and air quality within a particular region. In general, projects that are candidates for inclusion in an RTIP are first proposed by the cities, the county and local public transit operators. These projects are evaluated and prioritized by the county CMA, and then transmitted to the regional transportation planning agency (RTPA) for submission to the California Commission (CTC) as requests for state funding. The RTIP has a five-year programming horizon and is updated every two years. The Interregional (ITIP) is a five-year expenditure program consisting of transportation capital improvement projects for: (1) highways in rural areas that are part of the state-designated interregional roadway system; and (2) the state s intercity rail system. It also includes projects that have been determined to be of statewide significance. Caltrans, with some input from the RTPAs, is responsible for nominating projects for inclusion in the ITIP. The CTC then selects the projects that will actually be funded from the list provided by Caltrans. The State (STIP) is a five-year expenditure program adopted by the CTC in even-numbered years. The STIP consists of the RTIPs submitted to the CTC by the RTPAs and the ITIP developed by Caltrans. Under current state law, 75 percent of available STIP dollars is allocated for the RTIPs and 25 percent for the ITIP. The (TIP) is a federally required document produced by the RTPAs. MTC prepares this document for the Bay Area. The TIP lists public transit, general aviation and highway projects that are proposed to be funded with federal dollars. Project Development Process and Documents There are numerous steps involved in the project development process for a transportation capital improvement project before it proceeds to construction. Each project must be defined through a complex process that evaluates its purpose, need, location, impacts, and costs. 77

VTA s Corridor Plan Environmental Impact Report Project Study Report Conceptual Engineering Preliminary Engineering & Design Final Design Construction Alternatives Analysis Environmental Impact Statement State Requirement Federal Requirement VTA Process A Corridor Plan is used to develop a consensus on a strategy for improving a particular transit corridor or major highway. A technical and public process defines a project for future funding and implementation. A Project Study Report (PSR) is required by state law for a transportation capital improvement project prior to its programming in the STIP. The PSR must include a detailed description of the project s scope and estimated costs. An Alternatives Analysis is prepared for any federally funded transportation capital improvement project. In this case, it takes the place of a PSR. An Alternatives Analysis defines the proposed project, and analyzes its need, impacts and alternatives. It must be completed in conjunction with, or prior to, a project s environmental document. An environmental document must be completed before a project can be constructed. Under federal law, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Under state law, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). If a project is using both federal and state funds, then these two documents can be merged. The EIS/EIR analyzes the various environmental impacts of a proposed project, identifies possible measures to address these impacts, and provides legally mandated federal and state environmental clearance for a chosen preferred alternative for the project. 78

Subject-Specific Planning Documents Planning and ming Federal clean air laws require areas with unhealthy levels of ozone, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, or inhalable particulate matter to develop a State Implementation Plan (SIP), which describes how national ambient air quality standards will be attained. A SIP is not a single document, but rather a compilation of new and previously submitted plans, programs, air district rules, state regulations, and federal controls. In the San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland Bay Area, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) and MTC prepare a SIP to articulate the steps that the region will take to meet air quality standards in accordance with the federal Clean Air Act. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) combines the SIPs from the various regions throughout California, including the Bay Area, to create a statewide air quality improvement plan, also is called a SIP. CARB submits the statewide SIP to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for approval. Chapter 6 The federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which was enacted in 1990, required all public transit agencies to develop a Paratransit Plan by January 1992. Under this plan, public transit agencies were required to detail the actions that they would implement in order to comply with ADA requirements pertaining to paratransit service, which is a specialized service for individuals with disabilities who are unable to use fixed-route transit service for some or all of their trips. In compliance with federal law, VTA developed and submitted this plan, which was approved by the U.S. Department of (DOT). Once approved by DOT, public transit agencies are not required to continue to submit annual plans. Agencies were required to come into full ADA compliance by January 1997. For more information about VTA s paratransit service, please see Chapter 3, Public Transit Services. VTA prepares the Countywide Bicycle Plan for Santa Clara County. This document incorporates the bicycle plans developed by the county and the various cities within the county in accordance with the eligibility requirements for Development Act (TDA) Article 3 funds. The Countywide Bicycle Plan: (1) identifies existing bike lanes, routes and paths within Santa Clara County; and (2) proposes bicycle capital improvement projects designed to enhance the countywide bicycle network. 79

80