HYPO NOE Landesbank fur Niederosterreich und Wien AG

Similar documents
Oberoesterreichische Landesbank AG

KA Finanz AG. Table Of Contents. Major Rating Factors. Outlook. Rationale. Related Criteria And Research

Israel Discount Bank Ltd.

Mediobanca SpA. Primary Credit Analyst: Regina Argenio, Milan (39) ;

Germany-Based UniCredit Bank AG Upgraded To 'BBB+/A-2' On Improving Conditions At The Italian Parent; Outlook Developing

Russia-Based VTB Bank JSC Upgraded To 'BBB-/A-3' Following Similar Rating Action On The Sovereign; Outlook Stable

Austria-Based KA Finanz Downgraded To 'A-/A-2' On Revised Expectation Of State Support; Outlook Stable

Macquarie Group Ltd.

Erste Group Bank AG. Secondary Contact: Anna Lozmann, Frankfurt (49) ; Related Criteria And Research

Russia-Based B&N Bank Affirmed At 'B/B'; Outlook Stable

Germany-Based DVB Bank Ratings Lowered To 'BBB/A-2' On Weakened Strategic Importance To Owner; Outlook Negative

Research Update: Austria-Based KA Finanz 'A/A-1' Ratings Affirmed, Outlook Stable. Table Of Contents

Belgium-Based Belfius Bank 'A-/A-2' Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Stable

DLR Kredit A/S Affirmed At 'A-/A-2'; Outlook Stable

Jyske Bank 'A-/A-2' Ratings Affirmed On Offer To Buy Nordjyske Bank

ANZ Bank (Taiwan) Ltd.

Banque Internationale a Luxembourg

Secondary Contact: Cihan Duran, Frankfurt (49) ; Related Criteria And Research

Germany-Based Santander Consumer Bank Outlook Revised To Stable From Positive; 'BBB+/A-2' Ratings Affirmed

Banco de Credito del Peru And Subsidiary Upgraded To 'BBB+' From 'BBB' On Stronger Capitalization, Outlook Stable

Research Update: Italy-Based Banca Carige SpA Ratings Lowered To 'BBB-/A-3' On Italy BICRA Change; Outlook Negative.

Research Update: DekaBank Deutsche Girozentrale Affirmed At 'A/A-1' On Bank Criteria Change; Outlook Revised To Stable.

Italy-Based Veneto Banca 'BB/B' Ratings Affirmed On Results Of ECB Review; Outlook Remains Negative

Spain-Based Bankia Ratings Affirmed At 'BBB-/A-3' Following Merger Announcement; Outlook Still Positive

Netherlands-Based ING Bank 'A/A-1' Ratings Affirmed On Government Support And ALAC Review; Outlook Stable

Interactive Brokers LLC

Danske Bank's Proposed Senior Nonpreferred Notes Rated 'A-'

April 10,

Icelandic Bank Islandsbanki Affirmed At 'BBB-/A-3' After Change To Agreement With Glitnir; Outlook Still Stable

Volkswagen Financial Services Outlook To Stable, 'BBB+' Ratings Affirmed; VW Bank Ratings Affirmed, Outlook Negative

Dutch BNG Bank And NWB Bank Ratings Raised To 'AAA' Following Similar Action On The Netherlands; Outlooks Stable

Primary Credit Analyst: Heiko Verhaag, CFA, Frankfurt (49) ;

Santander Consumer Bank AG

Erste Group Bank AG. Secondary Contact: Anna Lozmann, Frankfurt (49) ; Related Criteria And Research

Banco de Bogota S.A. y Subsidiarias 'BBB-/A-3' Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Stable

Deutsche Genossenschafts-Hypothekenbank AG

Bank of Cyprus Assigned 'B/B' Ratings; Outlook Positive

Bank of South Pacific Ltd.

Dutch Bank LeasePlan 'BBB+/A-2' Ratings Placed On Watch Negative On Potential Ownership Change

Spain-Based Banco Popular Espanol Ratings Raised To 'BBB+/A-2' On Acquisition By Santander; Outlook Positive

Outlook On BrokerCreditService (Cyprus) Revised To Positive On Better Group Funding Profile; 'B/B' Ratings Affirmed

BNP Paribas 'A+/A-1' Ratings Affirmed, Off Watch; Outlook Negative; Subordinated Debt Rating Lowered

Basler Kantonalbank. Table Of Contents. Major Rating Factors. Outlook. Rationale. Related Criteria And Research

Basler Kantonalbank Long-Term Ratings Lowered To 'AA' Due To Remaining Legal And Reputational Risks; Outlook Stable

28 ИЮНЯ 2012 Г. 1

Credit Suisse (Schweiz) AG Assigned 'A/A-1' Ratings; Outlook Stable

PostFinance AG. Table Of Contents. Major Rating Factors. Outlook. Rationale. Related Criteria And Research

UBS Group AG And UBS AG Upgraded On Stable Business Model And Revenues; Outlooks Stable

NN Group 'A-' And Core Subsidiary 'A+' Ratings Remain On CreditWatch Negative After Offer On Delta Lloyd

South Africa-Based Capitec Bank Ltd. Assigned 'BB+/B' And 'zaa/zaa-1' Ratings; Outlook Stable

Transaction Update: Kommunalkredit Austria AG (Public Sector Covered Bonds)

Belfius Bank SA/NV. Primary Credit Analyst: Philippe Raposo, Paris (33) ;

Lloyds Bank Corporate Markets PLC And Lloyds Bank International Ltd. Assigned 'A-/A-2' Ratings; Outlook Positive

Temasek Holdings 'AAA/A-1+' Ratings Affirmed On Close Government Ties; Outlook Stable

Arab Bank PLC. Table Of Contents. Major Rating Factors. Outlook. Rationale. Related Criteria And Research

Navigators International Insurance Co. Ltd. Assigned 'A' Ratings; Outlook Stable

DLR Kredit A/S. Table Of Contents. Major Rating Factors. Outlook. Rationale. Related Criteria And Research

Banca Popolare dell'alto Adige Outlook Revised To Positive From Stable; 'BB/B' Ratings Affirmed

Banco Agromercantil de Guatemala 'BB/B' Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Remains Stable

Ameritas Life Insurance Corp.

Royal Bank of Scotland Ratings Lowered To 'A-/A-2' On Extended Restructuring; Outlook Negative

Primary Credit Analyst: Regina Argenio, Milan (39) ;

Swiss Financial Services Provider PostFinance AG Assigned 'AA+/A-1+' Ratings; Outlook Stable

Core Entities Of German Insurance Group W&W Affirmed At 'A-'; Outlook Stable

BCS Holding International And BCS (Cyprus) Ltd. Outlooks Revised To Stable On Resilient Earnings; Ratings Affirmed

Austrian Export Credit Agency Oesterreichische Kontrollbank 'AA+/A-1+' Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Stable

Banco Internacional de Costa Rica S.A.'BB-/B' Global Scale Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Remains Negative

National Public Finance Guarantee Corp., MBIA Inc. Ratings Raised On Reentry Into Financial Markets; Outlooks Are Stable

Three Euler Hermes Companies Upgraded To 'AA' From 'AA-' Due To Revised Status Within The Allianz Group; Outlook Stable

GRENKELEASING AG. Table Of Contents. Major Rating Factors Outlook: Stable Rationale Related Criteria And Research.

U.K. Life Insurer Scottish Equitable 'A+' Rating Affirmed; Outlook Remains Negative

Credit Mutuel Group And Core Entities Affirmed At 'A/A-1';Credit Mutuel Arkea Outlook To Negative On Intragroup Tensions

Irish Life Assurance Rating Raised To 'A-' Based On Criteria For Rating Above The Sovereign; Outlook Stable

Macquarie Group Ltd.

Statoil Outlook Revised To Positive; 'A+/A-1' Ratings Affirmed

Adam & Co. Assigned Preliminary 'BBB+/A-2' Ratings; Outlook Stable; RBS Outlook Revised To Negative, Ratings Affirmed

Research Update: National Australia Bank Ltd. & Subsidiaries Ratings Lowered On Criteria Change. Table Of Contents

Chubb Insurance Singapore Ltd.

Qatar-Based Doha Bank Assurance 'BBB+' Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Remains Negative

Primary Credit Analyst: Sean Cotten, Stockholm (46) ;

Liechtenstein-Based LGT Bank And VP Bank Ratings Affirmed After Review Of Government Support; LGT Off Watch

Pacific LifeCorp And Insurance Subsidiaries

Netherlands-Based ING Bank Outlook Revised To Stable On Strengthening Capital; 'A/A-1' Ratings Affirmed

Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico Downgraded To 'CC' From 'CCC-' On Imminent Default; Outlook Negative

Deutsche Pfandbriefbank AG

Health Care Service Corp. d/b/a Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas and Montana Downgraded

Vier Gas Transport GmbH (Open Grid Europe Group)

Various Rating Actions Taken On Six Colombian Financial Institutions After Downgrade Of Sovereign, BICRA Remains At '6'

Aargauische Kantonalbank

Royal Bank of Scotland International Rated 'BBB/A-2'; Outlook Positive

Poland-Based Insurer PZU Group Outlook Revised To Stable On Stabilizing Financial Strength; 'A-' Ratings Affirmed

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Inc. (Holding Company)

African Reinsurance Corp. 'A-' Ratings Affirmed After Insurance Criteria Change; Outlook Stable

Italian Multi-Utility Hera Outlook Revised To Negative On Delayed Credit Metric Recovery; 'BBB+/A-2' Ratings Affirmed

Die Schweizerische Post AG

Comision Federal de Electricidad, PEMEX, And Subsidiaries Local Currency Ratings Cut To 'A-' On Change In S&P Criteria

Dutch Energy Distribution Network Operator Enexis Holding N.V. Assigned 'A-1' Short-Term Rating

Empresa Generadora de Electricidad Itabo S. A. 'BB-' Ratings Affirmed, Outlook Remains Stable

Euler Hermes Group Core Subsidiaries Affirmed At 'AA-' On Improved Enterprise Risk Management; Outlook Stable

Swedish District Heating Company Fortum Varme Holding samagt med Stockholms stad Rated 'BBB+/A-2/K-1'; Outlook Stable

Transcription:

HYPO NOE Landesbank fur Niederosterreich und Wien AG Primary Credit Analyst: Michal Selbka, Frankfurt +49 (0) 69-33999-300; michal.selbka@spglobal.com Secondary Contact: Anna Lozmann, Frankfurt (49) 69-33-999-166; anna.lozmann@spglobal.com Table Of Contents Major Rating Factors Outlook Rationale Related Criteria Related Research WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT NOVEMBER 13, 2017 1

HYPO NOE Landesbank fur Niederosterreich und Wien AG SACP bbb + Support +3 + Additional Factors 0 Anchor Business Position bbb+ Weak -2 ALAC Support 0 Issuer Credit Rating Capital and Earnings Strong +1 Risk Position Adequate 0 Funding Liquidity Average Adequate 0 GRE Support +3 Group Support 0 Sovereign Support 0 A/Stable/A-1 Major Rating Factors Strengths: Weaknesses: Strong capitalization compared with peers. Very strong link to and important role for the 100% owner, the State of Lower Austria. One of the lowest net interest margins and highest cost-to-income ratios among peers. Limited geographic diversity and large reliance on public sector related business. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT NOVEMBER 13, 2017 2

Outlook: Stable Our outlook on Austria-based HYPO NOE Landesbank für Niederösterreich und Wien AG (HYPO NOE) is stable. This reflects our expectation that the State of Lower Austria will remain highly supportive of HYPO NOE and that the bank will preserve its strong capitalization over the next two years. Since HYPO NOE is a government-related entity (GRE), the ratings are sensitive to the creditworthiness of Lower Austria and any rating action on Lower Austria would lead to a review of our ratings on the bank. We could upgrade HYPO NOE if banking industry risk in Austria reduced and our forecast risk-adjusted capital (RAC) ratio for the bank increased sustainably above 15%. An improvement of industry risk alone could strengthen HYPO NOE's stand-alone credit profile (SACP) and lead to an upgrade of HYPO NOE's nondeferrable senior subordinated debt. We could lower the ratings if, contrary to our base-case expectations, any potential sizable losses or extraordinary dividend pay-outs caused a significant fall in the bank's capitalization, triggering a deterioration of our RAC ratio below 10%. We consider this scenario as unlikely though, given the bank's current strong buffer above the threshold. Rationale Our starting point for the ratings on HYPO NOE is the anchor of 'bbb+', which represents our view of the economic environment and banking industry risk in Austria. In our opinion, HYPO NOE's overall economic risk is in line with that for the anchor, since the bank operates mainly in the domestic market and does not plan to expand its foreign activities. We assess HYPO NOE's SACP at 'bbb'. We consider the bank's business position to be weak, mainly due to its concentrated business model. The effects of the cost base reduction stemming from the September 2017 intra-group merger of the HYPO NOE Gruppe Bank AG with its fully owned subsidiary HYPO NOE Landesbank AG are still to be observed. We assess the bank's capital and earnings as strong, driven by our base-case expectation that the RAC ratio will remain around 14.5%-15.0% over the next two years. Our assessment of HYPO NOE's risk position is adequate, largely reflecting our view that the bank will continue to focus on low-risk areas, such as public-sector-related lending and public-sector leasing. We view funding as average and liquidity as adequate, including the implicit benefits from the bank's link with the state. The ratings also factor in the bank's status as a GRE and our view that there is a high likelihood of timely and sufficient extraordinary support for the bank from its sole owner, Lower Austria, if needed. Our assessment is based on HYPO NOE's important role as one of Lower Austria's largest GREs and its very strong links with Lower Austria's government. This provides three notches of rating uplift above the bank's SACP, resulting in a long-term issuer credit rating of 'A'. Anchor: 'bbb+' reflecting mainly domestic exposure The anchor reflects the bank's economic risk in countries of operations--predominantly Austria--and banking industry risk for Austria. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT NOVEMBER 13, 2017 3

Our economic risk assessment is based on Austria's highly competitive and diverse economy, with strong economic fundamentals, high integration with Western European economies, and strong ties to Eastern and Southeastern Europe. With regard to industry risk, the Austrian banking industry benefits from a high share of core customer deposits, which limits dependence on external borrowing. We continue to see significant overcapacity in banks' domestic operations, which results in lower returns for Austrian banks than for many international peers. We believe the Austrian banking system needs further material and sustainable efficiency improvements to achieve greater stability. However, we already see a positive trend for banking industry risk in Austria. If the current positive momentum persists, in particular with regards to efficiency and asset quality improvement, we think returns will likely be more stable in the future. HYPO NOE's overall economic risk is in line with the anchor because, in our view, the bank's exposure outside Austria does not increase this risk materially. As of June 30, 2017, 86% of the bank's corporate and retail loan book exposure related to Austria, 5% to Germany, and about 3% to the Central and Eastern European countries that belong to the EU. The bulk of the remaining 6% was to Western European countries with a higher economic risk than Austria. Our ratings on HYPO NOE would be sensitive to a material increase in exposure to countries that pose a higher economic risk than Austria, for example, the neighboring Central and Eastern European markets. However, we do not expect the bank to change its foreign markets strategy or exposure breakdown over the next few years. Table 1 HYPO NOE Landesbank fur Niederosterreich und Wien AG Key Figures --Year-ended Dec. 31-- (Mil. ) 2017* 2016 2015 2014 2013 Adjusted assets 15,908.3 15,391.1 15,894.2 15,925.6 14,207.6 Customer loans (gross) 10,378.1 10,875.3 11,557.3 11,194.1 10,590.6 Adjusted common equity 609.8 601.0 544.2 537.9 561.2 Operating revenues 76.9 162.3 139.6 94.0 196.1 Noninterest expenses 67.4 128.9 129.1 127.1 116.5 Core earnings 9.0 19.1 6.4 (31.0) 53.6 *Data as of June 30. N.A.--Not available. N/A--Not applicable. N.M.--Not meaningful. Business position: Concentrated business model with weak cost-income efficiency HYPO NOE is a small commercial bank based in Lower Austria, with reported total assets of 16 billion on June 30, 2017. We consider HYPO NOE's business position to be weak compared with that of other banks operating in Austria and other countries with similar industry risk. Compared with better diversified peers (both in geographic terms and with regard to types of lending), we see the main weakness of HYPO NOE's business model as its regional focus and stronger concentration on the public sector and on public sector-related real estate. Therefore, and in the light of a continued low interest environment, net interest margin has been falling since 2014--reaching about 0.86% in December 2016--the bank also has one of the highest cost-to-income ratios among its peers. Although higher operating efficiency may result from the September 2017 intra-group merger of the HYPO NOE Gruppe Bank AG with its fully owned subsidiary HYPO NOE Landesbank AG, we will need to observe this improvement on the cost side. The main WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT NOVEMBER 13, 2017 4

aim of the recent merger is a re-integration of retail and housing finance businesses under one umbrella, while reducing the organizational and operational complexity at the same time. HYPO NOE's business focus is leasing, real estate lending, project and public finance, and financing of other public-sector-related entities. We expect the bank to remain the dominant player in Lower Austria in this business niche. Outside Austria, the bank is active in Germany and has limited activities in Poland, Czech Republic, and Slovakia. The bank also considers Bulgaria and Romania to be extended core markets, even though exposure there is marginal. We view strategic ownership support from Lower Austria and implicit funding benefits as critical for the stability of HYPO NOE's business model. In our view, the benefits of HYPO NOE's retail and corporate banking remain limited, but we notice that the bank has started efforts to optimize HYPO NOE's future balance sheet and cost-efficiency structure. Table 2 HYPO NOE Landesbank fur Niederosterreich und Wien AG Business Position --Year-ended Dec. 31-- (%) 2017* 2016 2015 2014 2013 Total revenues from business line (mil. ) 77.0 230.2 139.6 94.0 196.3 Commercial & retail banking/total revenues from business line 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Return on equity 2.7 11.5 1.1 (5.6) 10.2 *Data as of June 30. N.A.--Not available. N/A--Not applicable. N.M.--Not meaningful. Capital and earnings: The strongest component in the stand-alone analysis HYPO NOE's capital and earnings are strong, in our opinion. This is mainly based on our expectation that the bank's RAC ratio will remain in the range of 14.5%-15.0% over the next two years, compared with 15.1% as of June 30, 2017. An increase from 14.6% as of year-end 2016 resulted mainly from the optimization of the bank's over-the-counter (OTC) derivative portfolio that we see as a one-time effect. Despite the significant increase in HYPO NOE's capitalization demonstrated by a regulatory Tier 1 ratio increase to 17.3% as of June 30, 2017, from 13.5% in December 2015, our RAC ratio remained more or less unchanged. This results from our higher risk-weighted assets (RWAs) recognition for the credit valuation adjustment in relation to HYPO NOE's OTC derivative positions. We now reflect counterparty risk in our RAC ratio following our update to our capital methodology published July 20, 2017. On the other hand, our calculation of total adjusted capital increased in line with the regulatory figure, by about 57 million over 2016 from 544 million in December 2015, predominantly due to a positive solution to the HETA dispute and a related provisions write-back. We see a low 7 million extraordinary dividend pay-out to Lower Austria in 2017 as a sign of the owner's strong support of HYPO NOE's future capitalization. We expect that, due to the costs of bank stability contribution payments and IFRS9 implementation, the bank's capital base will remain stagnant over 2018-2019, accompanied by a slight WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT NOVEMBER 13, 2017 5

increase in HYPO NOE's RWAs over the same period. Our expectation of limited capital build-up also results from the very tight operating margins and vulnerability to negative tail events. However, we do not regard the RAC ratio as likely to deteriorate below 14.5%, in the absence of a material one-time event. The projected earnings buffer is low, indicating a low capacity for earnings to cover normalized losses. However, in our view, the bank's low internal capital generation capability is not a major rating consideration. This is because HYPO NOE's management is not targeting aggressive growth, and we expect real risk costs to remain significantly below our normalized loss expectations. We base our expectation for the next two years on the following assumptions: Marginal shrinkage of the loan portfolio, reflecting an ongoing decrease of less profitable public-sector-related lending. Although the bank has moved away from low-margin budget financing into higher-margin, long-term public-sector financing, and related leasing services, we expect improvements in bottom-line earnings to be negligible in the next two years, reflecting pressure from the low interest rate environment. We assume a reduction in noninterest expenses by about 5% over the next two years. Credit losses of a 7 million maximum annually. Low dividend payouts at 1 million per year. Table 3 HYPO NOE Landesbank fur Niederosterreich und Wien AG Capital And Earnings --Year-ended Dec. 31-- (%) 2017* 2016 2015 2014 2013 Criteria reflected in RAC ratios 2017 RAC Criteria 2017 RAC Criteria 2010 RAC Criteria 2010 RAC Criteria 2010 RAC Criteria Tier 1 capital ratio 17.3 16.3 13.5 12.3 13.7 S&P RAC ratio before diversification 15.1 14.6 14.9 14.9 14.8 S&P RAC ratio after diversification 10.7 11.2 12.2 12.3 11.8 Adjusted common equity/total adjusted capital 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Net interest income/operating revenues 73.0 75.6 93.0 137.1 62.2 Fee income/operating revenues 9.7 8.3 9.9 14.9 6.8 Market-sensitive income/operating revenues (4.5) (1.6) (18.2) (75.6) (3.0) Noninterest expenses/operating revenues 87.7 79.5 92.5 135.2 59.4 Preprovision operating income/average assets 0.1 0.2 0.1 (0.2) 0.5 Core earnings/average managed assets 0.1 0.1 0.0 (0.2) 0.4 *Data as of June 30. N.A.--Not available. N/A--Not applicable. N.M.--Not meaningful. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT NOVEMBER 13, 2017 6

Table 4 HYPO NOE Landesbank fur Niederosterreich und Wien AG Risk-Adjusted Capital Framework Data Exposure* Basel III RWA Average Basel III RW (%) S&P Global RWA Average S&P Global RW (%) Credit risk Government and central banks 6,452,475,535 186,013,438 3 254,830,240 4 Institutions and CCPs 1,085,900,567 158,234,688 15 183,312,716 17 Corporate 4,004,070,488 1,802,085,113 45 1,729,790,304 43 Retail 2,841,846,183 706,080,250 25 756,242,690 27 Of which mortgage 1,442,372,007 490,961,825 34 333,768,832 23 Securitization 10,108,936 0 0 303,268 3 Other assets 378,594,937 411,247,900 109 384,392,800 102 Total credit risk 14,772,996,646 3,263,661,388 22 3,308,872,016 22 Credit valuation adjustment Total credit valuation adjustment -- 138,567,200 -- 478,499,523 -- Market risk Equity in the banking book 0 0 0 0 0 Trading book market risk -- 0 -- 0 -- Total market risk -- 0 -- 0 -- Operational risk Total operational risk -- 296,300,000 -- 343,166,299 -- Basel III RWA S&P Global RWA % of S&P Global RWA Diversification adjustments RWA before diversification 3,698,528,588 4,130,537,839 100 Total Diversification/Concentration Adjustments -- 1,252,055,237 30 RWA after diversification 3,698,528,588 5,382,593,076 130 Tier 1 capital Tier 1 ratio (%) Total adjusted capital S&P Global RAC ratio (%) Capital ratio Capital ratio before adjustments 604,533,000 16.3 601,001,000 14.6 Capital ratio after adjustments 604,533,000 16.3 601,001,000 11.2 *Exposure at default. Securitisation exposure includes the securitisation tranches deducted from capital in the regulatory framework. Other assets includes Deferred Tax Assets (DTAs) not deducted from ACE. Adjustments to Tier 1 ratio are additional regulatory requirements (e.g. transitional floor or Pillar 2 add-ons). RWA--Risk-weighted assets. RW--Risk weight. RAC--Risk-adjusted capital. Sources: Company data as of Dec. 31, 2016, S&P Global. Risk position: Exposure mainly in low-risk areas, such as public-sector lending and public-sector-related leasing We consider HYPO NOE's risk position to be adequate relative to other banks with similarly weighted average economic risk scores and a similar product mix. We expect the bank to pursue lending growth mainly in low-risk areas--such as public-sector lending and public-sector related leasing--without compromising its risk appetite. We do not expect HYPO NOE to move away from its high concentration on financing public-sector real estate, but we believe WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT NOVEMBER 13, 2017 7

it will maintain a fairly favorable risk profile. The RAC ratio, in our view, adequately reflects HYPO NOE's main risks. Owing to the collateralized nature of the bank's lending and the comparably high quality of its clients, primarily related to the public sector, we expect it to report lower loan losses than the normalized losses we anticipate for comparable portfolios over the cycle. The main risk not fully covered by the RAC ratio is the concentration on real estate. However, risk is offset by HYPO NOE's focus on the public-sector clients, in our opinion. The ratio of nonperforming assets (NPAs) to total loans was 1.74% as of June 30, 2017, down from 3.68% at year-end 2015, mainly following a solution to the HETA dispute in 2016. We expect NPAs in the loan portfolio to remain low, reflecting the bank's geographic focus on Austria, its public-sector-related business and currently very favorable economic conditions of the low-interest-rate environment. Coverage of NPLs by loan loss provisions improved in June 2017 to 46.6% (24% at year-end 2015). Table 5 HYPO NOE Landesbank fur Niederosterreich und Wien AG Risk Position --Year-ended Dec. 31-- (%) 2017* 2016 2015 2014 2013 Growth in customer loans (9.1) (5.9) 3.2 5.7 (1.3) Total diversification adjustment / S&P RWA before diversification N/A 30.3 21.5 21.1 25.8 Total managed assets/adjusted common equity (x) 26.1 25.6 29.2 29.6 25.3 New loan loss provisions/average customer loans (0.0) 0.1 (0.0) 0.1 0.0 Net charge-offs/average customer loans 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Gross nonperforming assets/customer loans + other real estate owned 1.7 2.4 3.7 3.7 2.4 Loan loss reserves/gross nonperforming assets 46.0 38.1 23.6 26.3 43.8 *Data as of June 30. The increase results mainly from the revised concentration factor parameters implemented under our updated risk-adjusted capital criteria published on July 20, 2017. N.A.--Not available. N/A--Not applicable. N.M.--Not meaningful. Funding and liquidity: Benefits from implicit state support HYPO NOE's funding is average and its liquidity adequate, in our view, and we expect these factors to remain in line with the industry average. We regard state ownership as a key element in our assessment as it materially reduces the bank's sensitivity to market confidence. Since we believe that HYPO NOE will continue to rely on wholesale capital markets, parental backing will remain critical in our assessment of its funding and liquidity. We expect deposit levels to remain strong in the next two years, following vast increases in 2015 and 2016. Deposits covered about one-third of the bank's loan book as of Dec. 31, 2016. Covered bonds make up 31% of the total funding. We expect the bank to continue to shift its funding structure toward a matched model in terms of maturities and to further strengthen liquidity. At year-end 2016, our stable funding ratio for HYPO NOE was 92%, and the liquidity ratio was 0.84x, which was temporarily below the level of peers due to the large concentration of senior debt expiries in 2017. However, we note that all of the 2017 refinancing efforts have been successful. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT NOVEMBER 13, 2017 8

Table 6 HYPO NOE Landesbank fur Niederosterreich und Wien AG Funding And Liquidity --Year-ended Dec. 31-- (%) 2017* 2016 2015 2014 2013 Core deposits/funding base 30.1 29.1 23.5 16.8 17.1 Customer loans (net)/customer deposits 245.7 280.1 351.3 480.9 483.2 Long term funding ratio 80.4 79.8 87.8 87.3 85.6 Stable funding ratio 101.3 92.1 101.1 102.6 99.1 Short-term wholesale funding/funding base 20.6 21.1 12.7 13.2 15.0 Broad liquid assets/short-term wholesale funding (x) Net broad liquid assets/short-term customer deposits Short-term wholesale funding/total wholesale funding Narrow liquid assets/3-month wholesale funding (x) *Data as of June 30. N.A.--Not available. N/A--Not applicable. N.M.--Not meaningful. Support: Three notches of uplift for government support 1.2 0.8 1.3 1.4 1.0 18.2 (13.8) 20.8 40.3 2.8 29.4 29.8 16.6 15.9 18.1 5.7 3.8 1.8 1.9 1.2 We regard HYPO NOE as a GRE, for which we factor in three notches of uplift above the bank's SACP. We expect Lower Austria to remain a highly supportive long-term shareholder of the bank. We believe that the prospect of extraordinary government support for Austrian banks is uncertain, following the full implementation of the EU Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive, including bail-in powers, in January 2015. However, we currently believe that resolution frameworks are less likely to impede the state owners' willingness to provide extraordinary support to banks we consider as GREs, including HYPO NOE. Despite the reduced predictability of government support to systemically important commercial banks, we expect Lower Austria to remain highly supportive of HYPO NOE. We assess the Lower Austria government's propensity to support as not doubtful. In addition, the government has sufficient financial resources to support HYPO NOE. Our view of a high likelihood of extraordinary government support for HYPO NOE is based on our assessment of HYPO NOE's: Important role for Lower Austria, because a default could tarnish Lower Austria's reputation. In addition, the bank supports regional economic and social objectives; and Very strong link with the government of Lower Austria, owing to its very strong and durable relationship with the state. The 'BB+' issue ratings on HYPO NOE's nondeferrable subordinated debt are two notches lower than the bank's SACP, and the SACP indicates our view of a bank's credit risk without extraordinary support from the government. We believe that by notching from the SACP assessment, instead of from the issuer credit rating, we better capture the risk of an increased uncertainty of government support for subordinated debt issues under the bank resolution regime. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT NOVEMBER 13, 2017 9

Additional rating factors: None Related Criteria Criteria - Financial Institutions - General: Risk-Adjusted Capital Framework Methodology, July 20, 2017 General Criteria: Methodology For Linking Long-Term And Short-Term Ratings, April 7, 2017 Criteria - Financial Institutions - Banks: Bank Rating Methodology And Assumptions: Additional Loss-Absorbing Capacity, April 27, 2015 General Criteria: Rating Government-Related Entities: Methodology And Assumptions, March 25, 2015 Criteria - Financial Institutions - Banks: Bank Hybrid Capital And Nondeferrable Subordinated Debt Methodology And Assumptions, Jan. 29, 2015 General Criteria: Group Rating Methodology, Nov. 19, 2013 Criteria - Financial Institutions - Banks: Quantitative Metrics For Rating Banks Globally: Methodology And Assumptions, July 17, 2013 Criteria - Financial Institutions - Banks: Banks: Rating Methodology And Assumptions, Nov. 9, 2011 Criteria - Financial Institutions - Banks: Banking Industry Country Risk Assessment Methodology And Assumptions, Nov. 9, 2011 General Criteria: Use Of CreditWatch And Outlooks, Sept. 14, 2009 Criteria - Financial Institutions - Banks: Commercial Paper I: Banks, March 23, 2004 Related Research Positive Rating Actions Taken On Four Austrian Banks On Improving Industry Conditions, Oct 30, 2017 Banking Industry Country Risk Assessment Update: October 2017, Oct 04, 2017 Banking Industry Country Risk Assessment: Austria, May 29, 2017 Research Update: State of Lower Austria 'AA/A-1+' Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Stable, Nov 25, 2016 Anchor Matrix Industry Risk Economic Risk 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 a a a- bbb+ bbb+ bbb - - - - 2 a a- a- bbb+ bbb bbb bbb- - - - 3 a- a- bbb+ bbb+ bbb bbb- bbb- bb+ - - 4 bbb+ bbb+ bbb+ bbb bbb bbb- bb+ bb bb - 5 bbb+ bbb bbb bbb bbb- bbb- bb+ bb bb- b+ 6 bbb bbb bbb- bbb- bbb- bb+ bb bb bb- b+ 7 - bbb- bbb- bb+ bb+ bb bb bb- b+ b+ 8 - - bb+ bb bb bb bb- bb- b+ b 9 - - - bb bb- bb- b+ b+ b+ b 10 - - - - b+ b+ b+ b b b- WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT NOVEMBER 13, 2017 10

Ratings Detail (As Of November 13, 2017) HYPO NOE Landesbank fur Niederosterreich und Wien AG Counterparty Credit Rating Senior Unsecured Short-Term Debt A-1 Subordinated Counterparty Credit Ratings History 13-Aug-2014 10-Jun-2014 03-Jun-2014 10-Dec-2012 Sovereign Rating Austria (Republic of) Related Entities Lower Austria (State of) Issuer Credit Rating A/Stable/A-1 A BB+ A/Stable/A-1 A/Watch Neg/A-1 A/Positive/A-1 A/Negative/A-1 AA+/Stable/A-1+ AA/Stable/A-1+ *Unless otherwise noted, all ratings in this report are global scale ratings. S&P Global Ratings credit ratings on the global scale are comparable across countries. S&P Global Ratings credit ratings on a national scale are relative to obligors or obligations within that specific country. Issue and debt ratings could include debt guaranteed by another entity, and rated debt that an entity guarantees. Additional Contact: Financial Institutions Ratings Europe; FIG_Europe@spglobal.com WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT NOVEMBER 13, 2017 11

Copyright 2017 by Standard & Poor s Financial Services LLC. All rights reserved. No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an as is basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof. S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees. STANDARD & POOR S, S&P and RATINGSDIRECT are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor s Financial Services LLC. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT NOVEMBER 13, 2017 12