Poverty Assessment Tool Accuracy Submission: Addendum for New Poverty Lines USAID/IRIS Tool for East Timor Submitted: September 14, 2011

Similar documents
Poverty Assessment Tool Accuracy Submission: Addendum for New Poverty Lines USAID/IRIS Tool for Albania Submitted: September 14, 2011

Poverty Assessment Tool Accuracy Submission: Addendum for New Poverty Lines USAID/IRIS Tool for Uganda Submitted: June 28, 2010

Poverty Assessment Tool Accuracy Submission: Addendum for New Poverty Lines USAID/IRIS Tool for Indonesia Submitted: September 15, 2011

Annex 1 to this report provides accuracy results for an additional poverty line beyond that required by the Congressional legislation. 1.

1. Overall approach to the tool development

Poverty Assessment Tool Accuracy Submission USAID/IRIS Tool for Mexico Submitted: July 19, 2010

1. Overall approach to the tool development

Note on Assessment and Improvement of Tool Accuracy

Final Exam - section 1. Thursday, December hours, 30 minutes

How robust are indicator based poverty assessment tools over time? Empirical evidence from Central Sulawesi, Indonesia

Developing Poverty Assessment Tools based on Principal Component Analysis: Results from Bangladesh, Kazakhstan, Uganda, and Peru

Module 4 Bivariate Regressions

Mark Schreiner. 23 August 2015

The data definition file provided by the authors is reproduced below: Obs: 1500 home sales in Stockton, CA from Oct 1, 1996 to Nov 30, 1998

Cameron ECON 132 (Health Economics): FIRST MIDTERM EXAM (A) Fall 17

Econ 371 Problem Set #4 Answer Sheet. 6.2 This question asks you to use the results from column (1) in the table on page 213.

Chapter 6 Part 3 October 21, Bootstrapping

PART ONE. Application of Tools to Identify the Poor

ECON Introductory Econometrics. Seminar 4. Stock and Watson Chapter 8

Progress Out of Poverty Index An Overview of Fundamentals and Practical Uses

F^3: F tests, Functional Forms and Favorite Coefficient Models

Effect of Education on Wage Earning

Technical Documentation for Household Demographics Projection

A PROXY MEANS TEST FOR SRI LANKA

Simple Poverty Scorecards

Developing Poverty Assessment Tools

u panel_lecture . sum

Logistic Regression Analysis

[BINARY DEPENDENT VARIABLE ESTIMATION WITH STATA]

Assignment #5 Solutions: Chapter 14 Q1.

Welfare Shifts in the Post-Apartheid South Africa: A Comprehensive Measurement of Changes

Impact of Household Income on Poverty Levels

Relation between Income Inequality and Economic Growth

*1A. Basic Descriptive Statistics sum housereg drive elecbill affidavit witness adddoc income male age literacy educ occup cityyears if control==1

THE CONSUMPTION AGGREGATE

Linear regression model

Questions: Question Option 1 Option 2 Option 3. Q1 Does your household have a television? Q2 a mobile telephone? Yes No. Q3 a refrigerator?

tm / / / / / / / / / / / / Statistics/Data Analysis User: Klick Project: Limited Dependent Variables{space -6}

POVERTY IN TIMOR-LESTE

Econometrics is. The estimation of relationships suggested by economic theory

Analysis of the Holiday Effect

INVESTIGATING THE IMPLICATION OF UNEMPLOYMENT FOR POVERTY REDUCTION IN NIGERIA

Nazaire Houssou and Manfred Zeller

Review questions for Multinomial Logit/Probit, Tobit, Heckit, Quantile Regressions

Stat 328, Summer 2005

Instructions for running the E2 Cost Estimator for a Home

DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS. EUI Working Papers ECO 2009/02 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS. A Test of Narrow Framing and Its Origin.

Quantitative Techniques Term 2

Introduction to fractional outcome regression models using the fracreg and betareg commands

Dummy Variables. 1. Example: Factors Affecting Monthly Earnings

Stat3011: Solution of Midterm Exam One

Module 9: Single-level and Multilevel Models for Ordinal Responses. Stata Practical 1

A Portrait of Hedge Fund Investors: Flows, Performance and Smart Money

The impact of cigarette excise taxes on beer consumption

Non-linearities in Simple Regression

The Multivariate Regression Model

The relationship between GDP, labor force and health expenditure in European countries

Homework Assignment Section 3

Armenia: Poverty Assessment (In Three Volumes) Volume III: Technical Notes and Statistics

Labor Force Participation and the Wage Gap Detailed Notes and Code Econometrics 113 Spring 2014

Categorical Outcomes. Statistical Modelling in Stata: Categorical Outcomes. R by C Table: Example. Nominal Outcomes. Mark Lunt.

EC327: Limited Dependent Variables and Sample Selection Binomial probit: probit

Poverty Index Tool. Objective: Equip participants to use a tool to help measure Depth of Outreach (poverty level of new members)

Comparison of OLS and LAD regression techniques for estimating beta

ECON 256: Poverty, Growth & Inequality. Jack Rossbach

CHAPTER 4 ESTIMATES OF RETIREMENT, SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFIT TAKE-UP, AND EARNINGS AFTER AGE 50

Common Compensation Terms & Formulas

Senegal. EquityTool: Released December 9, Source data: Senegal Continuous DHS 2013

İnsan TUNALI 8 November 2018 Econ 511: Econometrics I. ASSIGNMENT 7 STATA Supplement

PRO-POOR TARGETING IN IRAQ Tools for poverty targeting

Measuring Service Delivery

a. Explain why the coefficients change in the observed direction when switching from OLS to Tobit estimation.

Your Name (Please print) Did you agree to take the optional portion of the final exam Yes No. Directions

Health Expenditures and Life Expectancy Around the World: a Quantile Regression Approach

Not your average regression: A practical introduction to quantile regression. James Ellens

Questions: Question Option 1 Option 2 Option 3

A Brief Illustration of Regression Analysis in Economics John Bucci. Okun s Law

Egypt. EquityTool: Released 1 st November Source data: Egypt DHS 2014

Maximum Likelihood Estimation Richard Williams, University of Notre Dame, Last revised January 13, 2018

Chapter 11 Part 6. Correlation Continued. LOWESS Regression

Methodological notes in epidemiology. Epidemiological Bulletin / PAHO, Vol. 26, No. 1. March

Joint Center for Housing Studies. Harvard University

(ii) Give the name of the California website used to find the various insurance plans offered under the Affordable care Act (Obamacare).

Labor Market Returns to Two- and Four- Year Colleges. Paper by Kane and Rouse Replicated by Andreas Kraft

Agricultural and Rural Finance Markets in Transition

Market Approach A. Relationship to Appraisal Principles

Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals. Statistical Note on Poverty Eradication 1. (Updated draft, as of 12 February 2014)

Getting Started in Logit and Ordered Logit Regression (ver. 3.1 beta)

Getting Started in Logit and Ordered Logit Regression (ver. 3.1 beta)

A Simple Poverty Scorecard for Bangladesh

ECO220Y, Term Test #2

sociology SO5032 Quantitative Research Methods Brendan Halpin, Sociology, University of Limerick Spring 2018 SO5032 Quantitative Research Methods

Professor Brad Jones University of Arizona POL 681, SPRING 2004 INTERACTIONS and STATA: Companion To Lecture Notes on Statistical Interactions

COMPREHENSIVE WRITTEN EXAMINATION, PAPER III FRIDAY AUGUST 18, 2006, 9:00 A.M. 1:00 P.M. STATISTICS 174 QUESTIONS

Solutions for Session 5: Linear Models

A Study of the Impact of Social Welfare Policies on Household Saving. Rate in China. Borui Xiao. Advised by. Professor Lakshman Krishmurthi

Testing the Solow Growth Theory

Mexico s Official Multidimensional Poverty Measure: A Comparative Study of Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Populations

The Moldovan experience in the measurement of inequalities

KEY WORDS: Microsimulation, Validation, Health Care Reform, Expenditures

Transcription:

Poverty Assessment Tool Submission: Addendum for New Poverty Lines USAID/IRIS Tool for East Timor Submitted: September 14, 2011 In order to improve the functionality of the existing PAT for East Timor, the IRIS Center has updated the tool with the following features: Re-ran the models at the $1.25/day line, using the new purchasing power parity (PPP) rates lines released by the World Bank Calibrated the model to also allow predictions at the $2.50/line Incorporated the prediction models into an Epi Info data entry template. This template closely resembles the paper questionnaire and allows the entry, storage, and retrieval of household demographics. The output of the data entry permits poverty prediction at two poverty lines, $1.25/day and $2.50/day. Revised the paper questionnaire to reflect best practice in survey design The data source used for the PAT in East Timor remains the same as when the tool was originally submitted for certification, as has the general tool construction process, aside from a more rigorous screening process to ensure that the variables are in line with the project s current best practices for selecting practical indicators. Because of these similarities, this document should be viewed as an addendum to the original tool s certification document. The document proceeds by detailing how the new $1.25 PPP was applied and by presenting the results at the $1.25/day and $2.50/day lines. Accompanying this document are the revised questionnaire and screenshots of the Epi Info data entry template and output. Updating the poverty line The tool originally predicted poverty outreach at the international poverty line of $1.08/day in 1993 PPP terms. With the release of the 2005 PPP rates and the adoption of the $1.25/day line in 2005 PPP terms by the World Bank, it seemed prudent to update the PAT to the new line, as well as update the tool to permit predictions at poverty line of $2.50/day. The legislation governing the development of USAID tools defines the very poor as either the bottom (poorest) 50 percent of those living below the poverty line established by the national government or those living on the local equivalent of less than the international poverty line ($1.25/day in 2005 PPP terms) 1. The applicable poverty line 1 The congressional legislation specifies the international poverty line as the equivalent of $1 per day (as calculated using the purchasing power parity (PPP) exchange rate method). USAID and IRIS interpret this to mean the international poverty line used by the World Bank to track global progress toward the Millennium Development Goal of cutting the prevalence of extreme poverty in half by 2015. This poverty line has recently been recalculated by the Bank to accompany new, improved estimates of PPP. The applicable 2005 PPP rate for East Timor is $ 15.9469 per capita each month (the local currency in East Timor is the US dollar).

for USAID tool development is the one that yields the higher household poverty rate for a given country. In East Timor the applicable threshold is the international poverty line of $1.25/day in 2005 PPP terms. The value of this line at the time of the survey is $US 15.9469 per capita each month. This line identifies 34.7% of households as very poor. Results for $1.25/day model Table 1 summarizes the accuracy results achieved by four estimation methods in predicting household poverty relative to the new $1.25/day poverty line. We use four estimation methods in this case, rather than the eight methods used originally, for two reasons: 1) fewer methods reduces analysis time; 2) the 1-step quantile was shown to be as accurate as 2-step methods in the original data analysis. For East Timor, the most accurate method, on the basis of BPAC, is the 1-step Quantile regression. Therefore, the 1-step Quantile was selected as the best model and used to develop the PAT. Table 2 presents a 2x2 matrix of the poverty status predicted by the model versus the true poverty status according to the expenditure benchmark. Table 3 provides the regression results from the $1.25/day model. Table 1: In-sample Results for Prediction at the Legislative Poverty East Timor (PPP) $1.25/day line* Total Poverty Undercoverage Leakag e PIE BPAC Share of very poor : 34.7% Single-step methods OLS 77.48 57.50 42.50 22.42-6.97 37.42 Quantile regression 78.33 69.37 30.63 31.85 0.42 68.15 (estimation point: 46) Linear Probability 78.80 62.28 37.72 23.40-4.97 47.96 Probit 78.82 63.34 36.66 24.41-4.25 51.09 * $1.25/day poverty line is 15.9469 US dollars per capita per month in December 2001 prices.

Table 2: Poverty Status of Sample Households, as Estimated by Model and Revealed by the Benchmark Survey (East Timor: 1-step weighted quantile regression) Number of true very poor households (as Number of true not very-poor households (as identified as very poor by the tool 431 (24.1%) 198 (11.0%) identified as not very-poor by the tool 190 (10.6%) 973 (54.3%)

Table 3: Regression Estimates using 1-step Quantile Method for Prediction at the $1.25/day Poverty Line.46 Quantile regression Number of obs = 1,792 Min sum of deviations 641.6857 Pseudo R2 = 0.3221 Indicator Coef. Std. Err. T P> t [95% Conf. Interval] Intercept 4.0227 0.1402 28.7000 0.0000 3.7478 4.2977 Household head age -0.0083 0.0056-1.4800 0.1400-0.0193 0.0027 - Household size -0.3452 0.0163 21.1500 0.0000-0.3772-0.3132 Household head age squared 0.0001 0.0001 1.1900 0.2320 0.0000 0.0002 Household size squared 0.0173 0.0013 13.8300 0.0000 0.0148 0.0197 Household lives in Central 0.2556 0.0349 7.3200 0.0000 0.1871 0.3241 Household lives in East 0.1089 0.0392 2.7800 0.0050 0.0321 0.1858 Household lives in Rural -0.0115 0.0358-0.3200 0.7490-0.0816 0.0587 Wall is made of rattan or tin -0.0608 0.0326-1.8700 0.0620-0.1247 0.0031 Roof is made of leaves -0.1380 0.0349-3.9600 0.0000-0.2064-0.0697 Roof is made of concrete, tile, or other 0.0008 0.0527 0.0200 0.9880-0.1025 0.1041 Number of rooms in the dwelling 0.0706 0.0122 5.7900 0.0000 0.0467 0.0945 Drinking water facility is private 0.2860 0.0433 6.6000 0.0000 0.2009 0.3710 Drinking water facility is shared 0.1121 0.0331 3.3900 0.0010 0.0472 0.1769 Toilet facility is bowl/ bucket 0.2649 0.0395 6.7000 0.0000 0.1874 0.3423 Light source is electricity 0.1371 0.0429 3.2000 0.0010 0.0530 0.2213 Light source is private electricity, petromax, candle or flashlight 0.2036 0.1091 1.8700 0.0620-0.0104 0.4175 Household owns fan 0.5334 0.0620 8.6000 0.0000 0.4119 0.6550 Household owns farmland -0.2240 0.0448-5.0100 0.0000-0.3118-0.1363 Number of axes owned 0.0972 0.0243 4.0000 0.0000 0.0496 0.1448 Number of baskets owned 0.0164 0.0060 2.7500 0.0060 0.0047 0.0282 Number of chickens owned 0.0124 0.0024 5.1400 0.0000 0.0076 0.0171 Wall is made of unbaked brick 0.1539 0.0434 3.5500 0.0000 0.0688 0.2390

Results for $2.50/day model Table 4 summarizes the predictive accuracy results for the $2.50/day poverty line using the Quantile model specification from the $1.25/day poverty line. The indicators are the same as those in the model for the $1.25/day line, but the percentile of estimation and the coefficients of the model were allowed to change (compare Tables 3 and 6). This methodology allows the content and length of the questionnaire to remain the same, but permits greater accuracy in predicting at the $2.50/day poverty line. Table 5 presents a 2x2 matrix of the poverty status predicted by the model versus the true poverty status according to the expenditure benchmark. Table 6 provides the regression results from the $2.50/day model. Table 4: Results Obtained for Prediction at the $2.50/day Poverty Line East Timor $2.50/day Line* Share of Poor: 72.7% Single-step methods Quantile regression (estimation point: 60%) Total Poverty Undercoverage Leakage PIE BPAC 79.93 86.29 13.71 13.85 0.10 86.15 * $1.25/day poverty line is 31.89 US dollars per capita per month in December 2001 prices. Table 5: Poverty Status of Sample Households, as Estimated by Model and Revealed by the Benchmark Survey, at $2.50 Poverty Line Number of true poor households (as Number of true not poor households (as identified as poor by the tool 1,126 (62.9%) 181 (10.1%) identified as not poor by the tool 179 (9.9%) 306 (17.1%)

Table 6: Regression Estimates using 1-step Quantile Method for Prediction at the $2.50/day Poverty Line.60 Quantile regression Number of obs = 1,792 Min sum of deviations 638.0712 Pseudo R2 = 0.3231 Indicator Coef. Std. Err. T P> t [95% Conf. Interval] Intercept 4.2441 0.1571 27.0100 0.0000 3.9360 4.5523 Household head age -0.0069 0.0063-1.1000 0.2730-0.0193 0.0055 - Household size -0.3229 0.0188 17.1700 0.0000-0.3598-0.2860 Household head age squared 0.0000 0.0001 0.7200 0.4710-0.0001 0.0002 Household size squared 0.0157 0.0014 11.0800 0.0000 0.0129 0.0185 Household lives in Central 0.2699 0.0404 6.6800 0.0000 0.1907 0.3492 Household lives in East 0.0755 0.0443 1.7000 0.0890-0.0114 0.1624 Household lives in Rural -0.0322 0.0402-0.8000 0.4240-0.1111 0.0467 Wall is made of rattan or tin -0.0790 0.0376-2.1000 0.0360-0.1527-0.0053 Roof is made of leaves -0.1938 0.0407-4.7600 0.0000-0.2737-0.1139 Roof is made of concrete, tile, or other -0.0805 0.0601-1.3400 0.1800-0.1983 0.0373 Number of rooms in the dwelling 0.0576 0.0136 4.2400 0.0000 0.0309 0.0843 Drinking water facility is private 0.2312 0.0505 4.5800 0.0000 0.1321 0.3302 Drinking water facility is shared 0.0913 0.0379 2.4100 0.0160 0.0169 0.1656 Toilet facility is bowl/ bucket 0.2340 0.0457 5.1200 0.0000 0.1443 0.3237 Light source is electricity 0.1530 0.0483 3.1700 0.0020 0.0583 0.2477 Light source is private electricity, petromax, candle or flashlight 0.3879 0.1263 3.0700 0.0020 0.1402 0.6357 Household owns fan 0.5124 0.0739 6.9300 0.0000 0.3674 0.6574 Household owns farmland -0.2490 0.0503-4.9500 0.0000-0.3477-0.1503 Number of axes owned 0.1095 0.0279 3.9300 0.0000 0.0549 0.1642 Number of baskets owned 0.0152 0.0073 2.0900 0.0370 0.0009 0.0295 Number of chickens owned 0.0079 0.0026 3.1000 0.0020 0.0029 0.0129 Wall is made of unbaked brick 0.1566 0.0490 3.2000 0.0010 0.0606 0.2526