T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F T E X A S S Y S T E M

Similar documents
23.02 Debt Management

The Permanent University Fund and Available University Fund

L E G I S L A T I V E A P P R O P R I A T I O N S REQUEST F I S C A L Y E A R S 2016 A N D 2017

Permanent University Fund

L EGISLATIVE A PPROPRIATIONS R EQUEST F ISCAL Y EARS 2014 AND 2015 T HE U NIVERSITY OF T EXAS S YSTEM A VAILABLE U NIVERSITY F UND

November 9-10, 2016 Meeting of the U. T. System Board of Regents - Finance and Planning Committee

L E G I S L A T I V E A P P R O P R I A T I O N S REQUEST F I S C A L Y E A R S 2020 A N D 2021

RULES OF THE SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Title 6Gx50 Chapter 6. Business Affairs Prev. Section Next

MESA COUNTY GOVERNMENT Expenditures. Actual Audited Projected Budget

b. provide guidelines to control the overall debt management process so that all liabilities are managed in accordance with stated objectives;

L E G I S L A T I V E A P P R O P R I A T I O N S REQUEST F I S C A L Y E A R S 2020 A N D 2021

STATE OF TEXAS CAPITAL EXPENDITURE PLAN

October 2016 LEGISLATIVE APPROPRIATIONS REQUEST THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM AVAILABLE UNIVERSITY FUND FISCAL YEARS 2018 AND 2019

Debt Management Policy

RESOLUTION. by the BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM. authorizing the issuance, sale and delivery of PERMANENT UNIVERSITY FUND BONDS,

SANTA CLARA COUNTY FINANCING AUTHORITY (A Component Unit of the County of Santa Clara, California)

FISCAL YEAR ENDING AUGUST 31, 2015

KEY FINANCIAL INDICATORS REPORT

Westchester County Health Care Corporation

Internal Lending Program Update

Approve Resolution to Issue General Revenue Obligations for University Projects and Refunding

STATE BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE STATE OF UTAH STUDENT LOAN PURCHASE PROGRAM An Enterprise Fund of the State of Utah

Approve Resolution to Issue and Refund General Revenue Obligations

For Fiscal Year Ending August 31, 2016

DEBT SERVICE GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT. Introduction. Credit Rating

THE UNIVERSITY OF MIC HIGAN REGENTS COMMUNICATION REQUEST FOR ACTION. Sale of Commercial Paper by the University

ITEM FOR ACTION AUTHORIZATION TO ESTABLISH INDENTURE FOR GENERAL REVENUE BONDS TO FINANCE AND REFINANCE DEBT FOR UC PROJECTS

VIII Policy on Debt Management (Approved by the Board of Regents April 7, 1995; Revised April 20, 2018)

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY AFFAIRS. INTEREST RATE SWAP POLICY As presented to the Board on April 26, 2018

Debt Management Standard Operating Procedure

Approve Resolution to Issue General Revenue Obligations for University Projects and Refunding

DEBT POLICY Last Revised October 11, 2013 Last Reviewed October 7, 2016

C ONSOLIDATED F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS

INTEREST RATE SWAP POLICY

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM

To the Board of Trustees of Northwestern University:

INTEREST RATE SWAP POLICY

REQUEST FOR ACTION. Authorization to Issue General Revenue Bonds

Annual Finance Policy Reports. Board of Trustees Finance & Audit Workgroup September 8, 2015

ADDENDUM TO SECTION 4.7 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA INTEREST RATE SWAP POLICY (SWAP POLICY)

RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Broward County,

Kent State University. Financial Report June 30, 2010

Revised ROLL CALL APPROVE VARIABLE RATE DEMAND UIC SOUTH CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2008

Municipal Bonds in the Lone Star State

Order of Saint Benedict of New Hampshire SAINT ANSELM COLLEGE. Financial Statements June 30, 2007

AVAILABLE UNIVERSITY FUND REPORT

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM PERMANENT UNIVERSITY FUND INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT

Texas Public Finance Authority - General Obligation (GO) Bond Debt Service Summary of Recommendations - Senate Historical Funding Levels (Millions)

WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY

Report to the Legislature and Governor Pursuant to Rider No. 5 to Available University Fund Appropriation SB 1, 85 th Legislature, Regular Session,

AUSTIN PEAY STATE UNIVERSITY FINANCIAL REPORT. For The Year Ended June 30, 2013

Independent Auditors Report

CONSOLIDATED REVENUE BOND REPORT. June 30, 2017

Texas Bond Review Board

Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority Financial Statements with Management's Discussion and Analysis June 30, 2017 and 2016

Review of the FY 2018 Texas Tech University System Combined Annual Financial Report

PERMANENT UNIVERSITY FUND. Report on Certain Specified Data as Required by Art (34e) of the Civil Statutes. June 30, 2013

Consolidated. Financial Statements Consolidated Statements. Independent Auditor s Report. of Changes in Net Assets. Consolidated Statements

Presentation to the UH Faculty Senate. University of Houston FY 2016 Budget For current information see

Policy No.: ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY Original Date: May 17, Page: 1 of 10 Owner: Financial and Administrative Services

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM

MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT (unaudited)

Financial Statements and Independent Auditors Report Permanent University Fund. Years Ended August 31, 2016 and 2015

CLAYTON STATE UNIVERSITY. Financial Report

Michigan State University. Financial Report

DATE ISSUED: 7/7/ of 11 LDU CA(LOCAL)-X

Gov. Rec. FY Agency Req. FY 2018

DEBT SERVICE BUDGET. This section is organized in the following manner: Page. Debt Service Budget 6-1. Debt Service Budget Fund Summary 6-2

MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT (unaudited)

Approval of a Resolution to Issue and Refund General Revenue Bonds

MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT (unaudited)

Annual. Investment Policy Report. August 18, 2011 Board of Trustees Finance & Audit Workgroup

SUPPLEMENTAL SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE SALE AND ISSUANCE OF MULTIPLE SERIES OF. TAX ALLOCATION REFUNDING BONDS AND RELATED BOND DOCUMENTS

consisting of: $7,800,000 * TAXABLE ENTERPRISE REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2011B $1,855,000 * ENTERPRISE REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2011C

INDIANA BOND BANK (A COMPONENT UNIT OF THE STATE OF INDIANA)

INTEREST RATE & FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY Adopted February 18, 2009

FAU Finance Corporation (A component unit of Florida Atlantic University) Financial Report For the Year Ended June 30, 2013

PIMA COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR SUMMARY OF BUDGET DATA

AWARD CONTRACTS TO REPLACE EXPIRING LIQUIDITY FACILITY

STATE BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE STATE OF UTAH STUDENT LOAN PURCHASE PROGRAM An Enterprise Fund of the State of Utah

Sources and Uses of Funds General Academic Institutions, Health-Related Institutions, Lamar State Colleges and Texas State Technical Colleges

COUNTY DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY

ROLL CALL. The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois (the Board ), from

Texas Public Finance Authority

BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER FUND A Major Fund of Broward County, Florida

LOCAL REVENUE SOURCES

Texas Public Finance Authority MASTER SWAP POLICY

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

University of Notre Dame du Lac Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

OFFICIAL BUDGET FORMS COCONINO COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT COCONINO COMMUNITY COLLEGE FISCAL YEAR Adopted Budget

The Texas State University System

BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON SYSTEM

University of Dayton FINANCIAL REPORT. June 30, 2015

HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES. Financial Statements. May 31, 2016 and (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon)

Miami Parking Authority RFP #18 11

University of Idaho Debt Policy Dated: December 8, 2016

ON FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FEDERAL AND STATE AWARDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH OMB CIRCULAR A-133 AND NEW JERSEY OMB CIRCULAR

Xavier University. Financial Statements as of and for the Years Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, and Independent Auditors Report

Lehigh Carbon Community College

PIMA COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR SUMMARY OF BUDGET DATA

Transcription:

J U N E 2 0 1 4 T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F T E X A S S Y S T E M Debt Overview

The University of Texas System The University of Texas System ( U. T. System ) is comprised of 15 institutions across the State of Texas with 9 academic institutions and 6 health-related institutions. U. T. Rio Grande Valley has been created by statute but will not become operational until Fall 2015. 1

U. T. System Debt Programs All U. T. System debt is issued in the name of the Board of Regents and is issued centrally on behalf of the fifteen U. T. System institutions through two primary financing programs: Revenue Financing System (RFS) secured by a system-wide pledge of all legally available revenues. Permanent University Fund (PUF) secured by distributions from the PUF to the Available University Fund (AUF). The U. T. System was the first, and is now one of only three public universities, to be rated Aaa/AAA/AAA by Moody s Investors Service, Standard and Poor s and Fitch Ratings, respectively. The U. T. System has been issuing debt since at least 1932. Revenue Financing System Bonds Security: Security Lien on Pledged Revenues Rating: Aaa/AAA/AAA $6.0 billion outstanding (1) Permanent University Fund Bonds Security: Security Lien on Interest of the System in the AUF Rating: Aaa/AAA/AAA $2.0 billion outstanding (1) 2 (1) As of May 31, 2014 The University of Texas System Total Outstanding Debt $8.0 billion

Conservative Debt Structure As of May 31, 2014, the U. T. System had $8.0 billion of PUF and RFS debt outstanding, of which almost 90% is fixed rate debt. The System maintains a declining debt service profile with no large bullet maturities. Long-term debt is typically structured to amortize over the useful life of the asset being financed. All of the System s variable rate demand bonds ( VRDBs ) are in weekly mode with no daily-mode VRDBs. All VRDBs are hedged with fixed-payer swaps diversified across six counterparties and include provisions for one-way collateral posting from swap counterparties. The System has limited roll-over risk related to its commercial paper ( CP ) programs due to daily maximums contained in dealer agreements. Synthetic Fixed-Rate ($1.3b) 18% Fixed-Rate Debt ($5.3b) 70% CP ($929m) 12% 3

Commercial Paper Programs The U. T. System has very successfully utilized commercial paper programs for more than 20 years providing U. T. institutions with very flexible, efficient and cost-effective financing options. The System utilizes both taxable and tax-exempt commercial paper on both the PUF and RFS debt programs primarily to provide interim financing before the debt is refinanced with long-term bonds. The System also utilizes commercial paper to finance capital equipment in lieu of more costly vendor financing. The System currently supports both of its commercial paper programs with internal liquidity in lieu of more costly bank liquidity, providing U. T. institutions with additional savings. The System s RFS CP program is currently sized up to a maximum of $1.25 billion outstanding at any one time with $615 million currently outstanding. The System s PUF CP program is currently sized up to a maximum of $750 million outstanding at any one time with $300 million currently outstanding. The current weighted average yield on the System s tax-exempt CP is 0.08% per annum (8 basis points) and the current weighted average yield on the System s taxable CP is 0.11% per annum (11 basis points). 4

Internal versus External Resources The U. T. System s debt programs are managed internally by the Office of Finance, a small group of professionals that manages the nation s 3 rd largest debt portfolio in higher education on behalf of the System s 15 institutions The U. T. System does not rely on an external financial advisor, further reducing issuance costs for U. T. institutions. FY 2014 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 The University All Texas All All All Texas All Texas of Texas Bond Texas Texas School Community/ System Issuers Cities Counties Districts Jr. Coll. ($/bond) ($/bond) (1) ($/bond) (1) ($/bond) (1) ($/bond) (1) ($/bond) (1) Underwriter's Spread $3.80 $4.23 $17.32 $10.25 $14.73 $11.83 Other Issuance Costs: Bond Counsel 0.50 0.58 Financial Advisor 0.00 0.35 Rating Agencies 0.43 0.57 Printing 0.01 0.01 Other 0.06 0.44 Subtotal 1.00 1.95 18.35 11.30 11.90 7.39 Total Cost per Bond $4.80 $6.18 $35.67 $21.55 $26.63 $19.22 Average Issue Size $240 million $175 million $20 million $25 million $20 million $31 million (1) Source: Texas Bond Review Board 2013 Annual Report and Texas Bond Review Board 2013 Local Government Debt database The U. T. System utilizes various external resources including investment banks, bond counsel, tax counsel, paying agents, escrow agents, accountants and printers 5

Revenue Bond Authority Governing boards of higher education institutions are authorized to issue revenue bonds to finance capital assets pursuant to Chapter 55 of the Texas Education Code, including: Sec. 55.02. SYSTEMWIDE REVENUE FINANCING PROGRAM. (a) The governing board of a university system may establish a systemwide revenue financing program to provide funds to acquire, purchase, construct, improve, renovate, enlarge, or equip property, buildings, structures, facilities, roads, or related infrastructure at an institution, branch, or entity of the university system. Sec. 55.13. AUTHORITY TO ISSUE REVENUE BONDS. (a) For the purpose of providing funds to acquire, purchase, construct, improve, enlarge, and/or equip any property, buildings, structures, activities, services, operations, or other facilities, for and on behalf of its institution or institutions, or any branch or branches thereof, each board may issue its revenue bonds from time to time and in one or more issue or series, to be payable from and secured by liens on and pledges of all or any part of any of the revenue funds of the board and its institution or institutions, or any branch or branches of any of its institutions. 6

Revenue Financing System Overview The U. T. System s Revenue Financing System provides a single, cost-effective financing structure for revenue-supported indebtedness of U. T. System institutions. Under the Master Resolution, the Board of Regents has, with certain exceptions, combined all of the revenues, funds and balances lawfully available to secure revenuesupported indebtedness into a system-wide pledge to secure the payment of RFS debt. The Master Resolution provides that the obligation of the Board to pay or cause to be paid the amounts payable under the Master Resolution and any Supplement is absolute, irrevocable, complete and unconditional. The Master Resolution requires that before any RFS debt is issued, the Board of Regents make a determination that: The Board will have sufficient Pledged Revenues to meet all financial obligations relating to the Revenue Financing System, and; The Members (i.e., System institutions) on whose behalf the debt is issued possess the financial capacity to satisfy their direct obligations. 7

Revenue Financing System Overview (cont.) Revenue Financing System debt is often issued for revenue-generating projects, such as student housing, parking facilities, and auxiliary projects. Net revenue generated by the project (i.e. revenues less operating expenses) is typically used to pay debt service on debt issued to finance the project. The debt is typically structured to amortize over the useful life of the project so that all beneficiaries of the project share in the cost of financing the project. Tuition revenue bond projects are also financed under the Revenue Financing System The System s RFS debt is rated Aaa/AAA/AAA by Moody s, S&P, and Fitch, respectively 8

RFS Debt Service Profile As of May 31, 2014, there was $4.4 billion in long-term RFS (non-trb) debt outstanding. 400 350 RFS Debt Service 300 250 $ million 200 150 100 50 0 FY 2015 FY 2019 FY 2023 FY 2027 FY 2031 FY 2035 FY 2039 FY 2043 9 NOTE: Includes debt service on all outstanding RFS debt outstanding as of May 31, 2014; however, excludes debt service on outstanding commercial paper notes. Expected annual debt service requirements on the Series 2007B bonds and Series 2008B bonds have been computed based on the fixedpayer rates achieved as a result of the associated swap agreements. Expected annual debt service requirements on the Series 2009B, Series 2010C and the Series 2010D bonds are reflected exclusive of the cash subsidy payments anticipated to be received by the Board from the United States Treasury as a result of the Board s designation of such bonds as Build America Bonds.

Tuition Revenue Bonds Tuition revenue bonds (TRBs) are specifically authorized by the Legislature under Chapter 55 of the Education Code. Despite the name, TRB debt service is not paid from tuition and fees. In fact, an institution need not have tuition to be authorized by the Legislature to issue TRBs. TRBs for U. T. institutions are issued under the RFS program and are secured by the same pledge of all legally available revenues of the System; however, the expectation is that the State will reimburse TRB debt service with general revenue. While not a legal obligation, the State has been reimbursing TRB debt service since 1971. The entire reason TRBs were instituted is as a mechanism for the State to assist institutions in funding much needed capital projects, with the Legislature specifically approving individual TRB projects and funding the associated debt service with general revenue. Without the general revenue debt service appropriations, there is no need for TRB authorizations since higher education institutions already have authorization to issue revenue bonds. 10

TRB Debt Service Profile U. T. System institutions only request actual TRB debt service in LAR requests, with TRB debt service amounts known through FY 2027. For the FY 2016-17 biennium, aggregate TRB debt service for U. T. institutions is approx. $130 million annually. 140 120 TRB Debt Service 100 $ million 80 60 40 20 0 FY 2016 FY 2018 FY 2020 FY 2022 FY 2024 FY 2026 11

Permanent University Fund Overview The Permanent University Fund ( PUF ) consists of 1) approximately 2.1 million acres of land located in 24 counties primarily in West Texas; and 2) investments made with the revenue of mineral leases on that land. PUF investments are managed by the University of Texas System Investment Management Company ( UTIMCO ) under the direction of the U. T. Board of Regents. Subject to certain Constitutional restrictions, including the maintenance of purchasing power, the U. T. Board of Regents determines the amount of annual PUF distributions, which cannot exceed 7%, unless necessary to pay PUF debt service. Under the Texas Constitution, distributions from the PUF constitute the Available University Fund (AUF), which is appropriated to service PUF debt and for the support and maintenance of System Administrations and of U. T. Austin, Texas A&M College Station, and Prairie View A&M. Two-thirds of the AUF is appropriated to the U. T. System and one-third is appropriated to the Texas A&M System. The System s PUF debt is rated Aaa/AAA/AAA by Moody s, S&P, and Fitch, respectively. 12

PUF and AUF Cash Flow Chart PUF Land (2,109,190 acres) Mineral Receipts PERMANENT UNIVERSITY FUND (PUF) Investments ($16.5 billion market value as of 04/30/14) AVAILABLE UNIVERSITY FUND (AUF) 2/3rds to U.T. System 1/3rd to A&M System Security for U.T. System PUF Bonds and Notes: PUF Bonds payable from the first lien on the Interest of the U.T. System in the AUF Security for A&M System PUF Bonds and Notes: PUF Bonds payable from the first lien on the Interest of the A&M System in the AUF Residual AUF Residual AUF income constitutionally appropriated to U.T. Austin and the U.T. System for specified purposes. Residual AUF Residual AUF income constitutionally appropriated to the A&M System for specified purposes. 13

PUF Bond Authority The boards of regents of the U. T. System and the Texas A&M System are authorized by Article VII, Section 18, to issue PUF bonds. Outstanding U. T. System bonds may not exceed 20 percent of the cost value of PUF investments, and Texas A&M System bonds may not exceed 10 percent of that cost value. PUF bond proceeds may only be used for acquiring land either with or without permanent improvements, constructing and equipping buildings or other permanent improvements, major repair and rehabilitation of buildings and other permanent improvements, acquiring capital equipment and library books and library materials, and refunding PUF bonds. PUF bond proceeds may not be used for student housing, intercollegiate athletics, or auxiliary enterprises. 14

Constitutional Restriction on PUF Debt Art. VII, Sec. 18 of the Texas Constitution limits the aggregate amount of PUF debt that may be issued by the U. T. Board of Regents: debt outstanding may not exceed 20% of the cost value of PUF investments, exclusive of the value of PUF lands. The System is currently at the Constitutional limit including PUF debt allocated by the Board of Regents to specific projects that has yet to be issued. 3,000 2,500 U. T. PUF Debt Outstanding and Constitutional Limit U. T. PUF Debt Outstanding U.T. PUF Constitutional Debt Limit U. T. PUF debt authorized but unissued of $705mm as of 4/30/14 1 2,000 $ million 1,500 1,000 $2,356 $2,194 $1,982 $1,736 $1,714 $1,753 $1,817 $2,508 $1,928 $2,667 500 15 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 YTD August 31 1. U.T. PUF Constitutional Debt Limit based on April 30, 2014 PUF book value of $13.34 billion.

U. T. System PUF Debt Service Profile As of May 31, 2013, there is $1.63 billion in long-term PUF debt outstanding 140 120 PUF Debt Service 100 $ million 80 60 40 20 0 FY 2015 FY 2017 FY 2019 FY 2021 FY 2023 FY 2025 FY 2027 FY 2029 FY 2031 FY 2033 FY 2035 FY 2037 FY 2039 FY 2041 16 NOTE: Includes debt service on all outstanding PUF Bonds as of May 31, 2013. Expected annual debt service requirements on the Series 2008A bonds has been computed based on the fixed-payer rates achieved as a result of the associated swap agreements. Expected annual debt service requirements on the Series 2009A bonds are reflected exclusive of the cash subsidy payments anticipated to be received by the Board from the United States Treasury as a result of the Board s designation of such bonds as Build America Bonds.