Succession Decisions and Retirement Income of Farm Households. Ashok Mishra Hisham El-Osta James Johnson

Similar documents
VOLUME 3 ISSUE 2 AMBER WAVES ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE/USDA. Larry Lefever, Grant Heilman Photography

Prepare, print, and e-file your federal tax return for free!

Permanent Income and the Importance of Precautionary Savings: An Instrumental Variable Approach

US. Farm Succession Plans and the Process of Transferring Land Ownership

CoBank Investor Presentation. March 31, 2018

INSIGHTS FROM AGRICULTURAL LENDERS. January 11 th, 2019 Top Farmer Conference Beck Agricultural Center Dr. Brady Brewer

Agricultural Development Chapter ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER LOAN PROGRAMS

AGFIRST FARM CREDIT BANK & DISTRICT ASSOCIATIONS

Ashok K. Mishra. Mitchell J. Morehart

FALL 2018 AGRICULTURAL LENDER SURVEY RESULTS

AGRICULTURAL LENDER SURVEY RESULTS

Brady Brewer, Allen Featherstone, Christine Wilson, and Brian Briggeman Department of Agricultural Economics Kansas State University

The Michigan Farm Succession Study: Findings and Implications

Intergeneration Transfers and Retiring Farmers

ANNEX CAP evolution and introduction of direct payments

Netherlands. May 2018 Statistical Factsheet

Italy. May 2018 Statistical Factsheet

Austria. May 2018 Statistical Factsheet

Estonia. May 2018 Statistical Factsheet

France. May 2018 Statistical Factsheet

Statement of Farming Activities

STATISTICS CANADA RELEASES 2015 NET FARM INCOME AND FARM CASH RECEIPTS DATA

Greece. Sources: European Commission, Eurostat, and Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs. Updated: M ay 2018

Denmark. Sources: European Commission, Eurostat, and Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs. Updated: M ay 2018

CoBank District 2016 Financial Information

Farm funding models and business structures in Australia

Click to edit Master title style. Credit Analysis. Assessing the Risk Profile of a. Pork Production Company

Statement of Farming Activities

AGRICULTURAL LENDER SURVEY. Spring 2018 Report

Volume II APPENDICES TO AN UPDATE OF AN ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC SUBSIDIES AND EXTERNALITIES AFFECTING WATER USE IN SOUTH FLORIDA

Statistical Factsheet. France CONTENTS. Main figures - Year 2016

Statistical Factsheet. Belgium CONTENTS. Main figures - Year 2016

Statistical Factsheet. Italy CONTENTS. Main figures - Year 2016

2011 Anikka Aurelia Martin

COBANK REPORTS FULL-YEAR FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR Net Earnings Increase 6 Percent to $565 Million; Capital And Liquidity Levels Remain Strong

Jason Henderson Vice President and Branch Executive Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Omaha Branch January 27, 2010

Farm and Family Living Income and Expenditures, 1998 through 2001

Statistical Factsheet. Lithuania CONTENTS. Main figures - Year 2016

I. INTRODUCTION TO THE US ECONOMY

Q1. Do you wish for your answers to be entered into the AAEA Extension Forecasting competition? Yes No

Focus on Household and Economic Statistics. Insights from Stats SA publications. Nthambeleni Mukwevho Stats SA

ANNEX CAP evolution and introduction of direct payments

University of Illinois

Risk is an unavoidable element in the business

INTRODUCTION. While significant attention has recently been focused on production contracts with large,

The Agricultural Credit Market

Indicators of the Kansas Economy

An Agricultural Law Research Article. The New Bankruptcy Chapter 12: A Computer Analysis of If and When a Farmer Can Successfully Reorganize

A BROADER PERSPECTIVE OF MEASURING THE WELL-BEING OF RURAL FARM AND NON-FARM HOUSEHOLDS

Statement of Farming Activities

AGRIBUSINESS SERVICES

Agricultural Income and Finance

Overview of Presentation

Targeting the Ultra Poor in Ghana. Abhijit Banerjee December 9, 2015

THE NATURE OF VALUE ADDED restructuring. In view of burgeoning revenue needs of

Agricultural. Income and Finance. Situation and. Outlook Report

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act - Cost Recovery Provisions, Expensing, and Like-kind Exchanges last updated

At IBISWorld, we know that industry intelligence is more than assembling facts: It's combining data and insight to answer the questions that

AGRICULTURAL LENDER SURVEY

AGEC 429: AGRICULTURAL POLICY LECTURE 18: ANALYSIS OF PAST FARM BILL PROGRAMS III

Crop Insurance Program Update RMA Administrator Bill Murphy

FARM LIABILITY APPLICATION APPLICANT INFORMATION SECTION

Certified Public Accountants

Agricultural and Rural Finance Markets in Transition Proceedings of Regional Research Committee NC-1014 Minneapolis, Minnesota October 3-4, 2005

2014 Farm Bill Overview

A Cross Comparison Between California and Its Domestic and International Competitors With Respect to Key Labor Issues

Midwest Perspectives. Bill Testa Vice President Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

CRAEA WORKING PAPER SERIES. Does Size Matter? Distribution of Crop Insurance Subsidies and Government Program Payments Across U.S.

2002 FSRIA. Farm Security & Rural Investment Act. (2002 Farm Bill) How much money is spent with the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)?

WTO Commitments and Support to Agriculture: Experience from Canada

Can U.S. Agriculture Survive in the World of Uncertainty? Flynn Adcock Texas A&M AgriLife Research

STATE OF THE SOUTH CAROLINA ECONOMY

An Economic Report Card for the U.S. Economy and Agriculture 2017 Mid-Year Report By Dr. Edmond J. Seifried and Dr. David M. Kohl

EMPOWERING OUR PARTNERS

Standing Rock Indian Reservation Agricultural Statistics 2002 Census of Agriculture

Rosebud Indian Reservation Agricultural Statistics 2002 Census of Agriculture

Brady Brewer, Allen Featherstone, Christine Wilson, and Brian Briggeman Department of Agricultural Economics Kansas State University

Institute of Government & Public Affairs University of Illinois. Illinois County Statistical Abstract. Cook

U.S. Farm Policy and the World Trade Organization: How Do They Match Up?

Interest Rates on Farm Loans

The Farm Credit System

Operating & Capital Expenditures: Section 29 (and elsewhere)

Agricultural Economic Update

Summary Results of the 2016 AAEA Outlook Survey

PERSONAL TAX INFORMATION WORKSHEET

Current Crop Insurance and Federal Policy Situation

Leverage of U.S. Farmers: A Deeper Perspective

- 1 - Abstract. Keywords: CGE modelling, European Enlargement, Common Agricultural Policy, hectare and animal premiums, GTAP.

CHAPTER 3 FARM INCOME

Sources: Surveys: Sri Lanka Consumer Finance and Socio-Economic Surveys (CFSES) 1953, 1963, 1973, 1979 and 1982

FINANCING IN AN EVOLVING AGRICULTURE DOWNTURN. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago November 29, 2016 Paul E. Anderson EVP- CCO

Operating & Capital Expenditures: Section I (and elsewhere)

Crop Insurance Update Barbara M. Leach Associate Administrator

Farm Safety Net. Dr. Alejandro Plastina Assistant Professor, Economics

( ) Page: 1/10 TARIFF IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES COMMUNICATION FROM THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Testimony. of Linda Dempsey Vice President, International Economic Affairs National Association of Manufacturers

CRS Report for Congress

Farm Loans to Finance

Consolidated Five-Year Summary of Selected Financial Data

Case Study #1: Mixed Farm Operation - The Kattel Farm

Transcription:

Succession Decisions and Retirement Income of Farm Households Ashok Mishra Hisham El-Osta James Johnson

Background Population is aging Concerns about comfortable retirement However, declining individual saving rate, increased cost of health care may result in a lower standard of living. Farm families do little formal planning or investing specifically for retirement. Amount of wealth at stake is substantial for most farm families. Farm households average net worth in 2001 was $545,869 compared to $395,500 for nonfarm households. Income for retirement is an issue that is being debated and receives attention from all sectors of the economy.

Objective Given the importance of succession and financial well-being of farm households in later life: The purpose of this presentation is to describe selected characteristics of the operators, their households, and their financial status related to: Retirement status and planning Designation of a successor to the farm Selection of a successor who is a family member Involvement of the successor in decisionmaking and management activities. Income and wealth of retiring farm households

Data 2001 and 2003 Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS). ARMS is a national farm-level data survey of approximately 10,000 farm households. As a special focus on retirement and succession, the 2001and 2003 ARMS queried farm households on their retirement decisions and succession plans.

Using the 2003 ARMS, farm operators have been classified into four categories: &First-indicate that they are already retired (app. 4%). &Second-retirement in the next five years (about 7%). &Third-age 65 or older not retired nor plan to retire (9%). &Finally, the largest category (80 percent of households), consists of all other principal farm operators.

Retiring and retired farm households are similar to all farm households in age and farm experience Years 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Retired Plan to retire in 5 years Age 65 not retired & no plans to retire All other principal operators All fam households Age Experience Source: 2003 ARMS/USDA.

Retiring and retired farm households have a significant presence in the farming community All other principal operators 80 Age 65 not retired & no plans to retire Plan to retire in 5 years 8.6 7.4 Retired 4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Percent Households Production value Acres owned Government payments Source: 2003 ARMS/USDA.

ERS Resource Regions

Retiring farm households are located across all regions of the U.S. 30 Retiring in 5 years Operators age 65 or older All farm households Percent of U.S. total 20 10 0 Mississippi Portal Basin and Range Fruitful Rim Southern Seaboard Eastern Uplands Prairie Gateway Northern Great Plains Northern Crescent Heartland Source: 2003 ARMS/USDA.

Retiring farm households are predominantly engaged in livestock enterprises 50 Retiring in 5 years Operators age 65 or older 40 All farm hosueholds 30 20 10 0 Cash grains and oilseeds Tobacco Cotton Vegetables, fruits,and nuts Nursery and greenhouse Other crops Beef cattle Dairy Hogs Other livestock Poultry and eggs Source: 2003 ARMS/USDA. Percent of U.S. total

Retiring farm households receive significant government farm program payments All farm households All other principal operators Age 65 not retired & no plans to retire Plans to retire within 5 years Retired 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Dollars Source: 2003 ARMS/USDA.

Less than one-third of farm operators have a succession plan, retiring farm households have slightly higher Have succession plan Have successsor Successor is a family member All farm households All other principal operators Age 65 not retired & no plans to retire Plans to retire within 5 years Retired 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Of those who have succession plan, the share who have designated a successor and the share of those who are family members. Source: 2003 ARMS/USDA.

Share of successors working in the business and handling management responsibilities varies All farm households All other principal operators Age 65 not retired & no plans to retire Plans to retire within 5 years Retired 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Percent Work in the business Participate in activities Source: 2003 ARMS/USDA.

Succession plans vary with the net worth of the household 100 90 80 70 60 Percent 50 40 30 20 10 0 Less than $50,000 $50,000- $99,999 $100,000- $249,999 $250,000- $499,999 $500,000- $999,999 Over $1 million Have succession plan Have successor Successor is a family member Source: 2003 ARMS/USDA.

Off-farm income is important to retired and retiring farm households Dollars per farm household 100% 100 80% Percent of household income 60% 40% 20% 75 50 Other off-farm income Income from disability, Social Security and other passive incomes Interest income Income from dividends and capital gains 25 0% Off-farm business income Retired Operators age 65 year or older Plan to retire in 5 years All other operators All farms Off-farm wages/salaries -20% 0 Farm income to household Average income Source: 2003 ARMS/USDA.

Retired and retiring farm households have significant nonfarm wealth 1,200 Farm net worth Nonfarm net worth 1,000 800 Thousand Dollars 600 400 200 0 Retired Plan to retire in 5 years Operators age 65 years or older All farm households Source: 2003 ARMS/USDA.

Farm households and particularly retiring farm households save regularly or for long-term goals 80 Save regularly Save for long-term goals 70 60 Percent of households 50 40 30 20 10 0 Retired Plan to retire in 5 years Operators age 65 years or older All farm households Source: 2003 ARMS/USDA.

Retiring and older farm households have diverse off-farm financial portfolios Other real estate 25% Farm households whose operator plans to retire in 5 years (average nonfarm net worth $231,255) All other assets Operators dwelling 14% 15% 23% 7% stocks, mutual funds, other financial assets Liquid accounts (cash, checking, savings, money market accounts, etc.) Retirement 16% accounts (IRA, Keogh, 401(k), etc.) Other real estate 19% Farm households whose operator is age 65 and no plans to retire (average nonfarm net worth $250,331) Operators dwelling 17% All other 15% assets 26% 13% stocks, mutual funds, other financial assets 10% Liquid accounts (cash, checking, savings, money market accounts, etc.) Retirement accounts (IRA, Keogh, 401(k), etc.) Source: 2003 ARMS/USDA

Summary Nationally about 7 percent of farm households indicate that they will retire in the next 5 years. Households with head who are retired, plan to retire or others age 65 or older represent about 20 percent of farm families. Relatively small percentage, 27 percent, of all farm operators indicated that they had a succession plan. Only one-third of the retiring farm households have succession plans. In most cases a successor is designated and most likely happens to be a family member.

Summary Farm households with operators planning to retire in the next 5 years: are younger and derive majority of their income from offfarm sources and have the highest average income. about 15 percent of these farm households own off-farm businesses. specialize in beef cattle, a less labor-intensive enterprise. are located principally in the Heartland, Northern Crescent, Eastern Uplands, and Fruitful Rim regions. less likely to be living in poverty (nearly 10%) than the average farm household (13%). have 32 percent of their wealth in nonfarm assets. 60 percent of these save regularly and 75 percent save for long-term goals. 46 percent of these households have IRAs.

Summary Farm households with operators age 65 year or older: are older and more experienced in farming. derive their income from disability and social security (27%), farming (23%), off-farm sources (20%), and total household income is lower than the average farm household. about 11 percent of these farm households own off-farm businesses. specialize in beef cattle (55%), a less labor-intensive enterprise. more likely to be living in poverty (18%) than the average farm or U.S. household (13%). have 25 percent of their wealth in nonfarm assets. 38 percent of these households save regularly and 46 percent save for long-term goals. 25 percent of these households have IRAs.

Conclusions The average household income of retiring (higher) operators age 65 or older (slightly lower) than the average U.S. household ($59,067) Further, the average wealth of retiring and operators age 65 or older is higher than the average of all U.S. households ($396,000). While the percentage of retiring farm families that have an IRA is smaller than all U.S. households they have farm wealth to support consumption in later life. With the combination of current income and wealth (farm and financial) they are in a position to meet their projected consumption needs in retirement.