OREGON STATE LOTTERY Annual Performance Progress Report (APPR) for Fiscal Year

Similar documents
OREGON STATE LOTTERY Annual Performance Progress Report (APPR) for Fiscal Year

FROM THE DIRECTOR, VERNON KIRK

Legislative Recommendations

Budget Agency Fiscal Report ($ in thousands)

W i n n i n g B i g f o r D e l a w a r e. P o w e r b a l l A l l C a s h L o t t o P l a y 4

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date: June 27, California State Lottery Commission. Robert T. O Neill Director. Nicholas Buchen, Deputy Director Finance Division

ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2018 THE VERMONT EDUCATION FUND RECEIVES 100% OF LOTTERY PROFITS.

LETTER FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

change brings opportunity

Massachusetts State Lottery Commission

OKLAHOMA LOTTERY COMMISSION CASE STUDIES

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013 HOUSE DRH10066-LB-38G (01/03) Short Title: Honest Lottery Act. (Public)

California State Lottery Commission. Nicholas Buchen Deputy Director, Finance Division. Item 10(i) Fiscal Year Budget

WELCOME TO THE OREGON LOTTERY

GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF LOTTERY AND CHARITABLE GAMES

Gov. Rec. FY Agency Req. FY 2016

OHIO LOTTERY COMMISSION. Dean DePiero Anne Bloomberg Rudy Stralka Robert White. Agency Review for Governor Strickland and Incoming Lottery Director

GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA D.C. LOTTERY AND CHARITABLE GAMES CONTROL BOARD

RHODE ISLAND LOTTERY

Fiscal Year 2018 Budget and Financial Plan Questions DC Lottery

Treasury, Oregon State Annual Performance Progress Report Reporting Year 2018 Published: 12/26/2018 1:57:19 PM

Certified Public Accountants and Management Consultants

Certified Public Accountants and Management Consultants

Oregon Department of State Lands

Certified Public Accountants and Management Consultants

Streamline and integrate your claims processing

GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA D.C. LOTTERY AND CHARITABLE GAMES CONTROL BOARD

Our Commitment to Taft-Hartley Plans

California State Lottery Commission 2015 SLAA REPORT

Winners Handbook RSL-500 (10-16)

Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Submissions to the Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs October 18, 2012

M E M O R A N D U M. To: California State Lottery Commission Date: May 20, Pat Meroney, Deputy Director of Finance

Audit Team: Julie Lebowitz, Audit Supervisor Tia L. Clark, Auditor-in-Charge Xian-Min Wu, Auditor

600+ licensed retail locations throughout Delaware

The Colorado Lottery Department of Revenue

CONNECTICUT LOTTERY CORPORATION

fiscal year 2009 Profits benefit the Vermont Education Fund

G4 Responsible Gaming Code of Practice

Lottery Fund 2017/18 December Update

Arkansas Health Insurance Marketplace

Social Responsibility in Gambling

Gaming ACCOUNTABILITY STATEMENT

Gaming BUSINESS PLAN ACCOUNTABILITY STATEMENT THE MINISTRY

CITY OF VILLA PARK The Hidden Jewel

Seventy-Eighth Oregon Legislative Assembly Regular Session

Heritage Toronto Budget Summary OPERATING BUDGET NOTES CONTENTS Service Performance 19

NEW MEXICO LOTTERY AUTHORITY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Trade promotion lottery permit

Vermont Lottery Commission. Greg Smith, Executive Director. Fiscal Year 2016 Budget Request

Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 9 1 (v 3) The Communications strategy

The Listening Project 3 Partnerships and Community Service

RFP PUBLIC OUTREACH SERVICES FOR WATER CONSERVATION

Virginia Department of Taxation eforms System Category: Government to Business. Initiation date: February 1, Completion date: June 1, 2012

Item 8(a) Fiscal Year Budget Amendment

Request to be Placed on the Internet Gaming Self-Exclusion List and Release

LOTTERY LICENSING ACT & REGULATIONS

Franchise Marketing Funds

Society Lottery Services. Notice of Special Conditions

The Pennsylvania Lottery and Senior Programs

Arizona State Lottery, A Component Unit of the State of Arizona

1995 Annual Report. Celebrating a 20-year winning tradition

CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF LICENSES FOR THE CONDUCT AND MANAGEMENT OF LOTTERY SCHEMES LOTTERY SCHEMES ORDER

Director s Message. I am very pleased to present the Strategic Plan for the California Child Support Services Program.

REPORT ON AUDIT OF BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Who Plays the Lottery in California?

Arizona State Lottery, A Component Unit of the State of Arizona

Memorandum. "Wisconsin Lottery." About the Lottery. Wisconsin Lottery, n.d. Web. 23 Mar <

O L A. Minnesota State Lottery July 1, 1997, through June 30, 2001 OFFICE OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR STATE OF MINNESOTA. Financial-Related Audit

PENSION SYSTEM RESUMPTION (PSR) RECOVERY PLAN PROJECT

THE CAQ S SEVENTH ANNUAL. Main Street Investor Survey

SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE FISCAL NOTE

THE K 12 PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEE HEALTH BENEFITS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

NEW MEXICO LOTTERY AUTHORITY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Minnesota Lottery Rules for Second Chance Promotion 2018 Powerball Second Chance Effective 02/06/18 Page of

Promotional Competition Terms and Conditions: SECTION 49 CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT NO 68 of 2008 NOTICE, THE FOLLOWING TERMS ARE IMPORTANT TO NOTE:

Business Plan Summary

Greenfield-Central Community School Band Boosters 2016 Car Raffle to benefit Greenfield-Central High School Band Program. Official Rules & Regulations

LOTTERY LICENSING ACT & REGULATIONS

Public pension plans are getting

BUDGET REPORT and MEASURE SUMMARY Joint Committee On Ways and Means

WORK PROPOSAL FOR A National Investment Strategy: The Way Ahead for Investment Promotion in Iraq

Profits benefit the Vermont Education Fund

Montana State Planning Grant A Big Sky Opportunity to Expand Health Insurance Coverage. Interim Report

Vermont Lottery Commission. Fiscal Year 2019 Budget Request. Daniel Rachek, Executive Director

SURVEY OF GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR SALES EXPECTATIONS

Massachusetts State Lottery Commission Meeting

XWIN CryptoBet SUMMARY

Finance. Mission Statement. Mandates. Expenditure Budget: $19,965,596

Justification Review

Box Elder County Tourism Tax Advisory Board 2011 Grant Packet

NEW MEXICO LOTTERY AUTHORITY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. JUNE 30, 2018 and 2017

Al-Amal Microfinance Bank

Comprehensive Annual Financial Report

Flexible Spending Account Services

Oregon Health Insurance Marketplace Presentation for The Transportation and Economic Development Subcommittee

Raffle Terms & Conditions Total Ticket $10,000 and Less

X. TIMELINE AND BUDGET ESTIMATES FOR IMPLEMENTATION

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Minnesota State Lottery

2006 MEMBER SATISFACTION SURVEY

Transcription:

Annual Performance Progress Report (APPR) for Fiscal Year 2005-06 Submitted: October 3, 2006 To obtain additional copies of this report, contact the Oregon Lottery at (503) 540-1415 or PO Box 12649, Salem, Oregon 97309-0649, or visit http://www.oregon.gov/das/opb/govresults.shtml#annual_performance_reports. Agency Mission The mission of the Oregon Lottery is to operate a lottery with the highest standards of integrity and security to earn maximum profits for the people of Oregon commensurate with the public good. ABOUT THIS REPORT Table of Contents Page TABLE OF MEASURES...1 PART I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...2 PART II: USING PERFORMANCE DATA...8 PART III: KEY MEASURE ANALYSIS...9

ABOUT THIS REPORT Purpose of Report The purpose of this report is to summarize the Oregon State Lottery s performance for the reporting period, how performance data are used, and to analyze Lottery performance for each key performance measure for the 2005-06 fiscal year. The intended audience includes Lottery managers, legislators, fiscal and budget analysts, and interested citizens. 1. PART I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY defines the scope of work addressed by this report and summarizes Lottery progress, challenges, and resources used. 2. PART II: USING PERFORMANCE DATA identifies who was included in the Lottery s performance measure development process and how the Lottery is managing for results, training staff, and communicating performance data. 3. PART III: KEY MEASURE ANALYSIS analyzes Lottery progress in achieving each performance measure target and any corrective action that will be taken. This section, the bulk of the report, shows performance data in table and chart form. KPM = Key Performance Measure The acronym KPM is used throughout to indicate Key Performance Measures. Key performance measures are those highestlevel, most outcome-oriented performance measures that are used to report externally to the legislature and interested citizens. Key performance measures communicate in quantitative terms how well the Lottery is achieving its mission and goals. The Lottery may have additional, more detailed measures for internal management. Consistency of Measures and Methods Unless noted otherwise, performance measures and their method of measurement are consistent for all time periods reported. Oregon State Lottery

Agency Mission: TABLE OF MEASURES 2005-06 KPM# 2005-06 Key Performance Measures (KPMs) Page # 1A-1 Net Profit After Expenses and Before Transfer 9 1A-2 Net Transfer Amount 11 1A-3 Administrative Expenses 13 1B-1 Lottery Players Who Consider Games Entertaining and Appealing 15 1B-2 Retailers Satisfied with Services Provided 17 1B-3 Business Plan Projects Completed Within Budget 19 2A-1 Oregonians Who Rate the Lottery Favorably 21 2A-2 Problem Gamblers Seeking Treatment 23 2A-3 Retailers Trained in Problem Gambling 25 3 Customer Service 27 1

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Contact: Mark W. Hohlt, Rules and Policies Manager Phone: (503) 540-1417 Alternate: Larry Trott, Senior Rules and Policies Analyst Phone: (503) 540-1046 1. SCOPE OF REPORT Sales: For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2006, the Oregon State Lottery achieved record sales of $1.096 billion, marking the first time in the Lottery s twenty-one year history that annual sales reached the billion dollar level. During the year, the Lottery exceeded $16.0 million in weekly Video Lottery SM sales three times. The Lottery had the highest sales year ever in each of the following categories: Total Lottery Sales: $1.096 billion (Gross traditional sales + Net Video Lottery SM sales.) Video Lottery SM Sales: $732.9 million Powerball Sales: $ 59.1 million Sports Action SM Sales: $ 12.1 million Win for Life SM Sales: $ 5.9 million Traditional Sales $363.1 million Nineteen of the top twenty all-time Lottery sales weeks were recorded during this past fiscal year. Another remarkable highlight from this past fiscal year includes the Lottery s Day of Winners. On October 19, 2005, a southern Oregon family won the $340 million Powerball jackpot, and four different players won $853,492 each with the Powerball Match 5 Bonus. In addition, there was one $2.6 million Megabucks SM jackpot winner from Portland, as well as one $50,000 Powerball prize winner, and eight $10,000 Powerball winners. Since the Lottery began in 1985, nearly $4.8 billion in Lottery profits has gone to public education, economic development, job creation, state parks, and watershed enhancement/salmon habitat restoration across the state. Looking ahead to the present biennium alone, the Lottery is projected to provide $1.063 billion for these programs based on the September 2006 revenue forecast. Transfer: The Lottery expects to transfer $531 million from FY 06 operations, a new record. This reflects earnings from increased sales as well as administrative savings. For the 05-07 biennium, based on the September 2006 forecast, transfers are projected to exceed the close-of-session forecast by $131.9 million. These records have been achieved while continuing to reduce administrative expenses to a new low of 2.5%, which is well below the 16% authorized in the Oregon Constitution. 2

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Video Lottery SM : At the direction of the Governor, Video Lottery SM line games were introduced beginning in May 2005. Successful implementation of line games among all participating retailers, as well as outstanding Powerball sales, contributed to the strong showing for Lottery sales statewide. Video Lottery SM sales increased 26% compared to the previous year s sales, while Powerball, fueled by game changes that helped create larger jackpots, experienced a 69% increase over FY 05. Approval Rating: The Lottery exceeded all of its established goals for: Retailer satisfaction 83.5% (exceeded target by 3.5%); Players who consider its games entertaining and appealing 63% (exceeded target by 3%); and Oregonians who rate the Lottery favorably overall 64% (exceeded target by 4%). Problem Gambling: No matter what the source from which a gambling problem might arise, the Lottery seeks to mitigate those problems by funding treatment programs which are administered through the Department of Administrative Services. The Lottery continues to educate Oregonians about problem gambling and the treatment available through television, radio, print advertisements, and information posted at Lottery retailer locations. For the 2005-2007 biennium, the Department of Human Services received $4.65 million in Lottery profits annually to fund Oregon Problem Gambling Services, allowing free treatment for Oregonians seeking help. The Lottery works with the Problem Gambling Services Manager at the Department of Human Services and the Oregon Gambling Addiction Treatment Foundation to guide the development of messaging and to help create outreach programs into communities. These efforts have helped place Oregon at the forefront of problem gambling consciousness. Oregon has an extensive program for raising public awareness of the risks inherent in gambling and the help available. The most recent prevalence study conducted with adult Oregonians reveals that an estimated 2.7% may have a gambling disorder. The Oregon Lottery will continue to help direct those in need of help to the problem gambling treatment that, thanks to Lottery profits, is free and confidential. The Lottery is posting the Gambling Hotline number on all of its Video Lottery SM terminals statewide. In addition, the Lottery instituted a clock feature on all of its games, and revised the terminals to display credits as dollars available. In FY 06, the Lottery continued to make substantial investments in providing public information about problem gambling and available treatment. The Lottery created and aired two campaigns directed at two separate audiences, women and men aged 21-34. The intent of the campaigns was to encourage these at-risk groups to call a help line to seek treatment. The campaigns included television, newspaper advertisements, posters, and brochures that are available at Oregon Lottery retailers and are made available for distribution by treatment and prevention communities throughout Oregon. 3

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Additionally, the Lottery created and aired a new campaign to educate players and potential players about how to manage the play of Lottery and other games of chance in order to avoid gambling problems. The messages focus on gambling responsibly and advise players to set time limits and budgets. The messages are simple and similar to those broadcast by the National Council on Problem Gambling and in Canada. Retailer Contracts: For FY 06, Retail Contracts processed nearly 400 new retailer contracts. Of those, 220 were for new installations at locations that did not previously have Lottery. Security: The security and integrity of Lottery operations continues to be a primary focus. Lottery Security continues to perform timely, thorough, and efficient background investigations on all Lottery employees, retailers, vendors, and contractors. The Assistant Director for Lottery Security, in conjunction with the Lottery Director and the Oregon Department of Justice, continues to pursue any alleged violations of law that threaten the fairness, integrity, security, or honesty of the Lottery. 4

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE OREGON CONTEXT The Lottery s responsibility is to develop, produce, and market its Lottery tickets and shares; pay its winners; cover its expenses; and transfer the net profits to the state. From April 1985 through June 2006, over $12 billion has been awarded in prizes, and over $4.8 billion has been transferred to the State Economic Development Fund which contains funds for public education, economic development, job creation, state parks, and watershed enhancement/salmon habitat restoration. 5

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2. PERFORMANCE SUMMARY KPM Progress Summary Key Performance Measures (KPMs) with Page References # of KPMs KPMs MAKING PROGRESS at or trending toward target achievement KPMs NOT MAKING PROGRESS not at or trending toward target achievement KPMs - PROGRESS UNCLEAR target not yet set Net Profit After Expenses and Before Transfer...Page 9 Net Transfer Amount...Page 11 Administrative Expenses...Page 13 Lottery Players Who Consider Games Entertaining and Appealing...Page 15 Retailers Satisfied with Services Provided...Page 17 Business Plan Projects Completed Within Budget...Page 19 Oregonians Who Rate the Lottery Favorably...Page 21 Problem Gamblers Seeking Treatment...Page 23 Retailers Trained in Problem Gambling...Page 25 Customer Service...Page 27 N/A 0 N/A 0 Total Number of Key Performance Measures (KPMs) 10 10 3. CHALLENGES As a state agency with essentially a private industry mission, the Oregon Lottery needs to perform to both private and public industry standards. The Lottery needs to continually move forward and build on proven successful strategies in order to monitor and control expenses and maximize sales commensurate with the public good. In fulfilling its mission, the Lottery faces three critical challenges: Constantly evolving consumer preferences for new and more entertaining games. Public perception and expectations of the Lottery, including how the money generated by the Lottery is used, and concerns about problem gambling. Increasing competition from other forms of gaming and entertainment. 6

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY To overcome these challenges, the Lottery will promote these strategic objectives: Generate optimal revenue for the public purpose by offering a broad variety of market-responsive games that will appeal to diverse consumer markets and support the success of a broad retailer base which matches the demands of the consumer markets. Minimize the potential impact of Lottery games on problem gambling behavior, and educate the public about problem gambling, the help available, and how Lottery profits benefit Oregonians. Develop an efficient and effective organization with a reasonable expenditure of funds for administration of the Lottery, consistent with generating optimal revenue. 4. RESOURCES USED AND EFFICIENCY The Lottery s Commission approved budget for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 was $278.3 million. The Lottery is entirely self-financed through sales of tickets and shares, and it does not receive or rely on any General Fund or other tax dollars. By law, no more than 16% of total annual revenue may be used for administrative costs (game vendor expenses, retailer commissions, and Lottery operating expenses). The Lottery currently operates on approximately 2.5% of its total annual revenue. 7

II. USING PERFORMANCE DATA Contact: Mark W. Hohlt, Rules and Policies Manager Phone: (503) 540-1417 Alternate: Larry Trott, Senior Rules and Policies Analyst Phone: (503) 540-1046 The following questions indicate how performance measures and data are used for management and accountability purposes. 1 INCLUSIVITY: Describe the involvement of the following groups in the development of the Lottery s performance measures. 2 MANAGING FOR RESULTS: How are performance measures used for management of the Lottery? What changes have been made in the past year? 3 STAFF TRAINING: What training has staff had in the past year on the practical value and use of performance measures? 4 COMMUNICATING RESULTS: How does the Lottery communicate performance results to each of the following audiences and for what purpose? Staff: Lottery staff in conjunction with the Oregon State Lottery Commission developed the performance measures based on Lottery established goals and targets in the Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Business Plan and Strategic Plan. Elected Officials: The Lottery s performance measures have always been shared with elected officials including the Governor and state senators and representatives. Stakeholders: The Lottery s performance measures reflect input from its major stakeholders including its players and its retailers. Citizens: The Lottery s performance measures reflect input from its major stakeholders, including the citizens of Oregon. The Lottery manages to the goals and performance measures established in its Commission-approved Business Plan and Strategic Plan. Results are tracked and reported to the Lottery Commission. The Lottery has added the new standardized customer service performance measures to the measures tracked. Lottery training has been on-the-job using the resources available on-line through the Internet, and in meetings with the Progress Board. Staff: Performance measurement results are posted on the Lottery s web-site. Elected Officials: Performance measurement results are reported annually to the Lottery Commission. Sales results are reported monthly to the Lottery Commission and to state officials. Stakeholders: Performance measurement results are posted on the Lottery s web-site. Citizens: Performance measurement results are posted on the Lottery s web-site. The Lottery communicates these results to the public through various mediums and its website. In addition, the Lottery also uses newsletters, field staff, and other direct means to communicate with retailers. Elected officials are informed via personal correspondence or meetings with Lottery staff. 8

KPM #1A1 NET PROFIT AFTER EXPENSES AND BEFORE TRANSFER. Goal Oregon Context Maximum profits for the people of Oregon. Measure since: 2004 The primary mission of the Oregon Lottery is to maximize revenue for the people of Oregon commensurate with the public good. Data source Audited Financial reports of the Oregon Lottery. Owner Kathy Ortega, Chief Financial Officer, (503) 540-1308. 1. OUR STRATEGY: To fulfill its mission of maximizing profits for the people of Oregon, the Oregon Lottery focuses on providing new and innovative games in conjunction with creative marketing plans and good customer service. The ultimate goal is to keep current players interested in Lottery products while creating new games to appeal to different demographics. This fiscal year, the Lottery also made a substantial effort to replace many of its older Video Lottery SM terminals with newer more appealing terminals capable of handling a variety of new games. $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $0 1A1 Net profit after expenses and before transfer - Millions 03 Data 03 Target 04 Data 04 Target 05 Data 05 Target 06 Data 06 Target The Lottery partners with its retailers to accomplish this goal. The Lottery also relies on a good working relationship with its gaming vendors in order to produce Lottery games and effective marketing campaigns that appeal to a broad player base. 2. ABOUT THE TARGETS: The target is the close-of-session forecasted net profit before transfers. A higher data point indicates increased profits generated by the Lottery for the public purpose. 3. HOW WE ARE DOING: Actual performance exceeded target by approximately 15%. The Lottery exceeded its target point and achieved record profits due to record sales of Lottery tickets and shares. The Lottery has consistently exceeded its target over the last several years. 4. HOW WE COMPARE: 9

5. 6. 7. Only other state Lotteries offer a good basis for comparison, and only six states offer Video Lottery, SM the prime revenue generator for the Oregon Lottery. Of those states, all of them administer Video Lottery SM sales differently. Some states hire private firms to run their Lottery operations and then take a percentage. Some states have a state agency run the lottery operation but sell the terminals to the retailers and then take a percentage. Others have large casino style operations. The Oregon Lottery is a state run lottery that provides Video Lottery SM terminals to its retailers. FACTORS AFFECTING RESULTS: As alluded to earlier, sales are affected by the quality of Lottery games, service, and advertising. Sales are also affected by the size of jackpots, as in the Powerball and Megabucks SM games. Sales can also be affected by the public s perception of gaming at any given time. That perception can be favorable or not, and can be based on actions of the Oregon Lottery or forces beyond the Lottery s control. WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE: The Lottery will continue to move forward and build on proven successful strategies while adapting to meet new challenges. ABOUT THE DATA: The Oregon Lottery is on a fiscal year, accrual based accounting cycle. The data, collected and maintained by the Lottery s Finance and Accounting section, is reliable, and is subjected to multiple audits to verify it. 10

KPM #1A2 NET TRANSFER AMOUNT. Goal Oregon Context Maximum profits for the people of Oregon. Measure since: 2002 The primary mission of the Oregon Lottery is to maximize revenue for the people of Oregon commensurate with the public good. Data source Financial reports of the Oregon Lottery. Owner Kathy Ortega, Chief Financial Officer, (503) 540-1308. 1. OUR STRATEGY: Lottery transfers are primarily a function of profits derived from sales of Lottery tickets and shares. As noted earlier, high sales are the result of a having a wide variety of innovative games, effective marketing strategies, and good customer service. Transfers are also impacted by Lottery administrative savings which are added to the amounts transferred. Administrative savings are primarily derived from cost-effective management of Lottery dollars and any administrative actual costs that are lower than budgets. 2. ABOUT THE TARGETS: $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $0 1A2 Transfer Amount - Millions 03 Data 03 Target 04 Data 04 Target 05 Data 05 Target 06 Data 06 Target The targets are set for the Lottery through a combination of factors including the DAS quarterly revenue forecast and expectations of the Governor and the Legislature based on previous transfers. A higher data point indicates increased funds raised by the Lottery for the public purpose. 3. HOW WE ARE DOING: The Lottery has exceeded its target and has achieved record transfers due to record sales of Lottery tickets and shares. The Lottery has consistently exceeded its target over the last several years. 4. HOW WE COMPARE: As with sales, state lottery transfers are difficult to compare. State lotteries differ substantially in what they do with the profits they earn and how those profits are subsequently used and transferred. In addition to widely different game offerings and private/public relationships, some lotteries are actually part of larger agencies and are not structured the same as the Oregon Lottery. 11

5. FACTORS AFFECTING RESULTS: Lottery profits, which are the primary source of Lottery transfers, can be affected by a number of factors. The variety of games and their entertainment value, customer service, and the perception of gambling and the Lottery all play roles. In terms of administrative savings, a number of factors come into play, but chief among them is the need to replace poor performing or outdated equipment in order to increase sales. These purchases are vital to generating sales, but they also increase capital spending. 6. WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE: The Lottery will continue to move forward and build on proven successful strategies while adapting to meet new challenges. 7. ABOUT THE DATA: The Oregon Lottery is on a fiscal year, accrual based accounting cycle. The data, collected and maintained by the Lottery s Finance and Accounting section, is reliable, and is subjected to multiple audits to verify it. 12

KPM #1A3 ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Goal Oregon Context Maximum profits for the people of Oregon. Measure since: 2002 The primary mission of the Oregon Lottery is to maximize revenue for the people of Oregon commensurate with the public good. Data source Financial reports of the Oregon Lottery. Owner Kathy Ortega, Chief Financial Officer, (503) 540-1308. 1. OUR STRATEGY: As part of the Lottery s mission to maximize revenue for the people of Oregon commensurate with the public good, the Lottery endeavors to control administrative expenses in order to be able to transfer more money for other essential state programs. The Lottery accomplishes this mission through fiscal responsibility, tight budget controls, and business acumen. 2. ABOUT THE TARGETS: 0% The Oregon Constitution mandates that annual administrative expenses of the Lottery not exceed 16% 03 Data 03 Target 04 Data 04 Target 05 Data 05 Target 06 Data 06 Target of total annual revenues from the sale of all Lottery tickets and shares. The lower the data point, the more money the Lottery transferred due to decreased administrative expenses. 3. HOW WE ARE DOING: 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 1A3 Administrative Expenses Despite having a 16% maximum spending cap, the Lottery, for the past several years has budgeted for less than 4% and rarely even exceeded 3%. Based on this ongoing performance, the Lottery is continuing to do extremely well. Lottery has consistently kept its expenses below the target. 4. HOW WE COMPARE: Based on virtually any standard of comparison, public or private enterprise, the Lottery compares very favorably. 5. FACTORS AFFECTING RESULTS: One of the largest single factors affecting this category is the cost of replacing outdated Lottery equipment, particularly Video Lottery SM equipment. Video Lottery SM terminals are expensive, and because the Lottery has over 11,000 of them, replacement of aging and obsolete terminals has substantial costs, but is 13

6. necessary for continuing sales growth. Failure to keep pace with equipment replacement, while saving administrative expenses, can result in decreased sales, eventually culminating in decreased profits and transfers. WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE: The Lottery will continue to move forward and build on proven successful strategies while adapting to meet new challenges. 7. ABOUT THE DATA: The Oregon Lottery is on a fiscal year, accrual based accounting cycle. The data, collected and maintained by the Lottery s Finance and Accounting section, is reliable, and is subjected to multiple audits to verify it. 14

KPM #1B1 LOTTERY PLAYERS WHO CONSIDER GAMES ENTERTAINING AND APPEALING. Goal Customer and Stakeholder Satisfaction. Oregon Context Game appeal is linked to higher sales which in turn are linked to maximizing revenue. Data source Player survey information. Owner Carole Hardy, Assistant Director of Marketing, (503) 540-1030. Measure since: 2002 1. OUR STRATEGY: The Lottery s strategy is to: 1. Introduce new and improved games that continue to hold the interest of its long-time players and attract an emerging gaming audience; 2. Implement marketing programs that do the same; and 3. Provide good customer service. In addition to its own staff, Lottery depends even more on its retailers to provide good customer service. In addition, the Lottery works closely with various gaming vendors, research companies, and advertising agencies to accomplish its overall marketing goals. 2. ABOUT THE TARGETS: 66% 64% 62% 60% 58% 56% 1B1 Lottery players who consider games appealing 03 Data 03 Target 04 Data 04 Target 05 Data 05 Target 06 Data 06 Target Lottery seeks to maintain its appeal among a majority of its current players while constantly working to penetrate new markets. A higher data point represents a more favorable result for the Lottery and the state of Oregon. 3. HOW WE ARE DOING: The Lottery continues to exceed the set target in this category, and this year s performance is consistent with past data. 4. HOW WE COMPARE: Approximately two-thirds of Lottery players consider Lottery games entertaining and appealing. This measurement is so narrowly tailored to Lottery, with its diverse and unique game mix, that it is somewhat difficult to compare elsewhere. Based on record sales, this data may understate the level of satisfaction with Lottery games. 15

5. FACTORS AFFECTING RESULTS: It is difficult to obtain an accurate assessment of an individual player s feelings about Lottery games because their experiences vary at any particular point in time. 6. WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE: While the data is generally positive, the Lottery plans to focus on improving the numbers in this category. To that end, the Lottery is bringing in new Video Lottery SM terminals and games, as well as traditional games that appeal to a broad market of Oregonians. 7. ABOUT THE DATA: Every six months, the Infotek Research Group, a market research provider contracted by the Oregon Lottery, conducts a tracking study among 1,000 Oregonians aged 18 or older. The data gathered for the study was obtained by using the Random Digit Dial sampling method. The confidence level for the study is 95% and there is a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1%. 16

KPM #1B2 RETAILERS SATISFIED WITH SERVICES PROVIDED. Goal Oregon Context Data source Customer and Stakeholder Satisfaction. Measure since: 2002 Retailers who are satisfied with Lottery services will be more productive and sell more products, which in turn generates more revenue. Retailer survey information. Owner Tim Eaton, Assistant Director of Retail Operations, (503) 540-1101. 1. OUR STRATEGY: The Lottery s strategy is to provide retailers fair compensation rates, good customer service and support, and initial and ongoing training. 2. ABOUT THE TARGETS: Satisfied retailers provide better customer service and sell more tickets and shares, which in turn results in higher sales and greater revenues. Therefore, the higher the data point the better for the Lottery and the state of Oregon. 3. HOW WE ARE DOING: 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 1B2 Retailers satisfied with services provided 03 Data 03 Target 04 Data 04 Target 05 Data 05 Target 06 Data 06 Target The Lottery has done consistently well in this area with a satisfaction rate of nearly 85%. Over the past three years, the deviation has been less than 1%. 4. HOW WE COMPARE: In addition to being a business partner, retailers also represent the first level of player service for the Lottery. Consequently, the measurement in this category is substantially a customer service measurement. As a measurement of customer service, an 83.5% satisfaction rate is very competitive, in either the private or public sector. 5. FACTORS AFFECTING RESULTS: There are a number of factors that influence retailers opinions of the Lottery. There are the compensation rates paid and the customer service and support provided by the Lottery, actions taken against a retailer by the Lottery in accordance with the retailer contract, retailers interactions with their own customer/player base, and public opinion. 17

6. WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE: When all factors are considered, the Lottery is doing extremely well in this category and has done so consistently for several years. As a result, the Lottery will continue to move forward and build on proven successful strategies while adapting to meet new challenges. 7. ABOUT THE DATA: The data is from an annual survey of Lottery retailers conducted by mail to 3,520 retailers. The response rate was 27.6% this past year. 18

KPM #1B3 BUSINESS PLAN PROJECTS COMPLETED WITHIN BUDGET. Goal Oregon Context Data source Customer and Stakeholder Satisfaction. Measure since: 2002 Implementation of these plans within budget is essential to the ongoing operations of the Lottery and its mission to generate revenue for the citizens of Oregon. Project Management. Owner Rhonda Williams, Senior Project Coordinator, (503) 540-1394. 1. OUR STRATEGY: The Lottery considers good business planning to be an integral part of its mission to maximize profits for Oregonians. Completion of projects within budget is a critical aspect of good planning and execution. 2. ABOUT THE TARGETS: Agency tracked projects are measured primarily by the amount of projects performed within budget and resource constraints. Completion of these projects is essential to the ongoing operation of the Lottery and its mission to generate profits for the citizens of Oregon. 3. HOW WE ARE DOING: 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 1B3 Business Plan projects completed 03 Data 03 Target 04 Data 04 Target 05 Data 05 Target 06 Data 06 Target The Lottery exceeded its target for this fiscal year by nearly 14% and has met or exceeded target for the last four years. 4. HOW WE COMPARE: Based on either a public or private sector standard, a successful completion rate of 88.9% within budget and resource constraint is outstanding. 5. FACTORS AFFECTING RESULTS: A variety of factors affect this category, most notably issues with outside vendors who provide game and system programming, equipment, and other critical services. 6. WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE: 19

7. The Lottery will continue to move forward and build on proven successful strategies while adapting to meet new challenges. ABOUT THE DATA: Data is for the fiscal year and is gathered and maintained internally by Lottery staff. The data is considered reliable. 20

KPM #2A1 OREGONIANS WHO RATE THE LOTTERY FAVORABLY. Goal Oregon Context Data source Integrity Public Trust. Favorable perception of the Oregon Lottery by Oregonians enables the Lottery to continue to operate and fulfill its mission. Public Survey. Owner Carole Hardy, Assistant Director of Marketing, (503) 540-1030. 1. OUR STRATEGY: The Lottery s strategy is to perform in a manner that assures Oregonians that the Oregon Lottery is continually working hard to maintain the fairness, integrity, security, and honesty of the Lottery and its games, and to maximize profits for the public purpose commensurate with the public good. 66% 64% 62% 60% 2A1 Oregonians who rate the Lottery favorably Measure since: 2002 2. ABOUT THE TARGETS: 58% It is very important that Oregonians, who were responsible for voting in the Lottery, maintain a favorable image of the Lottery. Confidence in the way 03 Data 03 Target 04 Data 04 Target 05 Data 05 Target 06 Data 06 Target the Lottery conducts its business, knowing how Lottery profits benefit the state, and knowing how the Lottery proactively deals with problem gambling issues, are major factors contributing to an overall positive public perception. The higher the data point, the better the result for the Lottery and the state of Oregon. 3. HOW WE ARE DOING: Considering that a significant percentage of Oregonians are opposed to gaming of any kind, the fact that 64% of Oregonians rate the Lottery favorably is an impressive statistic. In fact, the latest favorability rating is the highest it has been in the last five years and is part of an overall four year upward trend. 4. HOW WE COMPARE: The best comparison to be made would be with other state of Oregon agencies. However, since the Lottery is unique in that its primary mission is to earn profits versus providing some form of government service, a valid comparison would be difficult to make. 5. FACTORS AFFECTING RESULTS: 21

Much of what Oregonians know about the Lottery comes to them through the media. Thus, what and how the media chooses to report about the Lottery is significant and can influence public opinion. The Lottery conducts public information outreach programs to educate Oregonians about the Lottery, how it operates, how Lottery profits benefit Oregonians, and to educate the public about problem gambling and how to receive treatment for those in need. 6. WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE: When all factors are considered, the Lottery is doing extremely well in this category and has done so consistently for several years. As a result, the Lottery will continue to move forward and build on proven successful strategies while adapting to meet new challenges. 7. ABOUT THE DATA: Every six months, the Infotek Research Group, a market research provider contracted by the Oregon Lottery, conducts a tracking study among 1,000 Oregonians aged 18 or older. The data gathered for the study was obtained by using the Random Digit Dial sampling method. The confidence level for the study is 95% and there is a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1%. 22

KPM #2A2 INCREASE IN PROBLEM GAMBLERS SEEKING TREATMENT. Goal Oregon Context Data source Integrity Public Trust and Public Good Civic Benefit. Measure since: 2002 While seeking to maximize profits for the state commensurate with the public good, it is vital to consider and offset any negative consequences that might ensue. Data obtained from the Department of Human Services and local treatment centers. Owner Carole Hardy, Assistant Director of Marketing, (503) 540-1030. 1. OUR STRATEGY: In cooperation with the Department of Human Services (DHS), the Oregon Lottery seeks to educate those players with potential or actual problem gambling issues to the warning signs and treatment resources available to them. 2. ABOUT THE TARGETS: 50% 40% 30% 20% 2A2 Problem gamblers seeking treatment 10% 0% In conjunction with DHS, the Lottery has set an annual target of an increase of 10% for those problem 03 Data 03 Target 04 Data 04 Target 05 Data 05 Target 06 Data 06 Target gamblers seeking treatment. The purpose of the target is to measure the effectiveness of Lottery s efforts to communicate information to Oregonians about how to seek treatment. Treatment effectiveness remains a DHS target. Currently, it is estimated that only a small percentage of Oregonians with a gambling problem seek help. The goal of the Lottery s efforts is to reach more people in need and to encourage them and their families to call to seek help. As a result, the higher the data point, the more positive the result is for Lottery and the state of Oregon. 3. HOW WE ARE DOING: Although there was a drop-off from the previous year, the Lottery still achieved its goal of a 10% increase which is a positive outcome. The trend over the last few years has been up and down, with Lottery either achieving its target or substantially exceeding it. 4. HOW WE COMPARE: Because efforts at addressing problem gambling are so varied across the country and around the world, it is difficult to make a valid comparison. However, there is some data from South Africa on the issue that does offer some insight into how Oregon compares with other jurisdictions. Reporting on a South 23

African study concerning problem gambling, an article in a Cape Town newspaper, the Cape Argus, notes that, it was found that in Montana and North Dakota, for example, the incidence of problem gambling increased. In Oregon, and in New Zealand, they declined. The article goes on to state that South Africa, like New Zealand, and Oregon in the U.S., has an extensive programme for raising awareness of the risks inherent in gambling. 5. FACTORS AFFECTING RESULTS: Factors affecting results include: The effectiveness of the Lottery s advertising messages and outreach programs, the retailers cooperation in assisting to get the message out at their level, and the data collection capabilities of DHS. 6. WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE: The Lottery will continue to move forward and build on proven successful strategies while adapting to meet new challenges. 7. ABOUT THE DATA: The data is obtained from DHS which, directly and through providers, is responsible for handling calls seeking treatment. The information is deemed to be highly reliable. More detailed information can be obtained through DHS. (NOTE: For 2004, the goal was to maintain the number of problem gamblers seeking treatment. The Lottery met that goal. As a result the chart appears to be blank for that year.) 24

KPM #2A3 RETAILERS TRAINED IN PROBLEM GAMBLING. Goal Oregon Context Data source Integrity Public Trust and Public Good Civic Benefit. Measure since: 2004 While seeking to maximize profits for the state commensurate with the public good, it is vital to consider and offset any negative consequences. Data obtained from the Lottery s training staff. Owner Tim Eaton, Assistant Director of Retail Operations, (503) 540-1101. 1. OUR STRATEGY: The Lottery s strategy is to make training in problem gambling issues mandatory for all new Lottery retailers prior to the installation of any Lottery equipment. 2. ABOUT THE TARGETS: Our retailers represent the front line of interaction with Lottery players. Therefore, in order to be effective in dealing with problem gambling issues, Lottery retailers must have training in this area. The higher the data point, the better the outcome for the Lottery and the state of Oregon. 3. HOW WE ARE DOING: The Lottery is consistently at 100% in this category. 4. HOW WE COMPARE: 150% 100% 50% 0% 2A3 Retailers trained in problem gambling 03 Data 03 Target 04 Data 04 Target 05 Data 05 Target 06 Data 06 Target The Lottery does not have training statistics from other agencies or industries in this category. There may well be organizations that achieve a comparable 100% training goal. 5. FACTORS AFFECTING RESULTS: The Lottery mandates initial retailer training to include problem gambling. The Lottery has absolute control over this target. 25

6. WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE: The Lottery will continue to move forward and build on proven successful strategies while adapting to meet new challenges. 7. ABOUT THE DATA: Data is collected and maintained by the Lottery s retailer training section. Data collected is for the fiscal year. The data is reliable. 26

KPMs # 3 Goal CUSTOMER SERVICE: Percent of customers rating their satisfaction with the agency s customer service as good or excellent : overall, timeliness, accuracy, helpfulness, expertise, availability of information. Customer and Stakeholder Satisfaction. Measure since: NEW Oregon Context Favorable perception of the Oregon Lottery by Oregonians enables the Lottery to continue to operate and fulfill its mission. Data source Customer service surveys. Owner Carole Hardy, Assistant Director of Marketing, (503) 540-1030. 1. OUR STRATEGY: In order to measure different levels of customer service, the Lottery sent questionnaires to several thousand Lottery retailers to solicit their responses. Retailers represent the vast majority of the Lottery s customer base. 2. ABOUT THE TARGETS: The targets were developed through the Department of Administrative Services for use by all reporting state agencies. 3. HOW WE ARE DOING: As a stand alone measure, the results are quite good. This is the first time the Lottery has responded to this measurement. 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Percent rating service good or excellent Overall Timeliness Accuracy Helpfulness Expertise Availability of Informatio n 2006 91.4% 86.6% 90.7% 94.0% 93.3% 85.6% 2007-09 Target 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 4. HOW WE COMPARE: The Lottery will be able be make a valid comparison to other state of Oregon agencies once all the data regarding these measurements is submitted. 27

5. FACTORS AFFECTING RESULTS: The quality of Lottery s employees and their training are the major factors affecting the results. 6. WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE: The Lottery will continue to move forward and build on proven successful strategies while adapting to meet new challenges. 7. ABOUT OUR CUSTOMER SERVICE SURVEY: The Lottery sent written questionnaires to 3,520 Lottery retailers of which 971 were returned for a response rate of 27.6%. 28