Impure Public Goods. Vani K Borooah University of Ulster

Similar documents
Economics 11: Solutions to Practice Final

Exogenous variables are determined outside a macroeconomic model. Figure 5.1 A Model Takes Exogenous Variables and Determines Endogenous Variables

Lecture 12: Public goods

A Real Intertemporal Model with Investment Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

PRODUCTION COSTS. Econ 311 Microeconomics 1 Lecture Material Prepared by Dr. Emmanuel Codjoe

= 500 4q. Some Applications of Differentiation Single Variable Case

ECO 2013: Macroeconomics Valencia Community College

Consumers cannot afford all the goods and services they desire. Consumers are limited by their income and the prices of goods.

ANSWER: We can find consumption and saving by solving:

We want to solve for the optimal bundle (a combination of goods) that a rational consumer will purchase.

Economics 393 Test 2 Thursday 28 th June 2018

Answer ALL questions from Section A and ONE question from Section B. Section A weighs 60% of the total mark and Section B 40% of the total mark.

Microeconomics (Externalities Ch 34 (Varian))

X 410 Business Applications of Calculus

Introductory to Microeconomic Theory [08/29/12] Karen Tsai

Perverse General Equilibrium Effects of Price Controls

Economics 431 Final Exam 200 Points. Answer each of the questions below. Round off values to one decimal place where necessary.

Intermediate Macroeconomic Theory II, Fall 2006 Solutions to Problem Set 4 (35 points)

Journal of Cooperatives

0 $50 $0 $5 $-5 $50 $35 1 $50 $50 $40 $10 $50 $15 2 $50 $100 $55 $45 $50 $35 3 $50 $150 $90 $60 $50 $55 4 $50 $200 $145 $55 $65

Microeconomic Analysis PROBLEM SET 6

Faculty: Sunil Kumar

Choice. A. Optimal choice 1. move along the budget line until preferred set doesn t cross the budget set. Figure 5.1.

Microeconomics, IB and IBP

Chapter 4 Topics. Behavior of the representative consumer Behavior of the representative firm Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter Thirty. Production

Prepared by Iordanis Petsas To Accompany. by Paul R. Krugman and Maurice Obstfeld

2- Demand and Engel Curves derive from consumer optimal choice problem: = PL

Math: Deriving supply and demand curves

Microeconomic Analysis

ECO 209Y MACROECONOMIC THEORY AND POLICY LECTURE 12: THE DERIVATION OF THE AGGREGATE DEMAND CURVE

Panel on market liquidity

Syllabus for Economics 30 Public Policy Analysis Fall 2015

ECO 352 International Trade Spring Term 2010 Week 3 Precepts February 15 Introduction, and The Exchange Model Questions

Final Exam - Solutions

Economics 335 Problem Set 6 Spring 1998

Intermediate Microeconomics

Econ 3029 Advanced Macro. Lecture 2: The Liquidity Trap

Syllabus for Economics 30 Public Finance Fall 2014

University of Toronto June 17, 2002 ECO 208Y - L5101 MACROECONOMIC THEORY. Term Test #1 LAST NAME FIRST NAME

ECS2601 Oct / Nov 2014 Examination Memorandum. (1a) Raymond has a budget of R200. The price of food is R20 and the price of clothes is R50.

8a. Profit Maximization by a competitive firm: a. Cost and Revenue: Total, Average and Marginal

ECONOMICS QUALIFYING EXAMINATION IN ELEMENTARY MATHEMATICS

Lecture 12: Taxes. Session ID: DDEE. EC101 DD & EE / Manove Taxes & International Trade p 1. EC101 DD & EE / Manove Clicker Question p 2

Fiscal policy. Macroeconomics 5th lecture

Model Question Paper Economics - I (MSF1A3)

Chapter 4 Specific Factors and Income Distribution

Firm s Problem. Simon Board. This Version: September 20, 2009 First Version: December, 2009.

GS/ECON 5010 section B Answers to Assignment 3 November 2012

Economics 311 Midterm Exam

ECO 100Y L0101 INTRODUCTION TO ECONOMICS. Midterm Test #2

Econ 380 Problem Set 1 Answer Sheet

Exam A Questions Managerial Economics BA 445. Exam A Version 1

In our model this theory is supported since: p t = 1 v t

Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 5

Mikroekonomia B by Mikolaj Czajkowski. MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Graphs Details Math Examples Using data Tax example. Decision. Intermediate Micro. Lecture 5. Chapter 5 of Varian

Homework 1 Solutions

Econ Honors: Midterm 2 (Anthony Yuen) November 14, 2007

Topic 7. Nominal rigidities

A Real Intertemporal Model with Investment Part 1

Print last name: Solution Given name: Student number: Section number

Problems. the net marginal product of capital, MP'

Partial Equilibrium Model: An Example. ARTNet Capacity Building Workshop for Trade Research Phnom Penh, Cambodia 2-6 June 2008

Mathematical Economics dr Wioletta Nowak. Lecture 2

Monetary Macroeconomics Lecture 3. Mark Hayes

Production. Any activity that creates present or future economic value (utility). The transformation of inputs into outputs

Notes On IS-LM Model Econ3120, Economic Department, St.Louis University

Exercises Solutions: Oligopoly

OVERVIEW. 1. This chapter presents a graphical approach to the determination of income. Two different graphical approaches are provided.

Lecture Note 3. Oligopoly

Chapter 4. Consumer and Firm Behavior: The Work- Leisure Decision and Profit Maximization. Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Public Economics (ECON 131) Section #8: Public Goods

FACULTY NAME: MANAGEMENT SCIENCE NAME OF DEPARTMENT: ACCOUNTING, ECONOMICS AND FINANCE. Intermediate Macro-Economics

IMPORTANT INFORMATION:

KOÇ UNIVERSITY ECON 202 Macroeconomics Fall Problem Set VI C = (Y T) I = 380 G = 400 T = 0.20Y Y = C + I + G.

Overview Basic analysis Strategic trade policy Further topics. Overview

EC 202. Lecture notes 14 Oligopoly I. George Symeonidis

log(q i ) pq i + w i, max pq j c 2 q2 j.

9 D/S of/for Labor. 9.1 Demand for Labor. Microeconomics I - Lecture #9, April 14, 2009

The Robinson Crusoe model; the Edgeworth Box in Consumption and Factor allocation

Chapter 21. The Monetary Policy and Aggregate Demand Curves

Real Business Cycles (Solution)

This appendix discusses two extensions of the cost concepts developed in Chapter 10.

GS/ECON 5010 Answers to Assignment 3 November 2008

Solutions to Assignment #2

ANTITRUST ECONOMICS 2013

Aggregate Demand I, II March 22-31

Lastrapes Fall y t = ỹ + a 1 (p t p t ) y t = d 0 + d 1 (m t p t ).

a. If the price per ticket is $45, how much revenue does Sugar Mountain earn?

Appendix 1: The theory of consumer s behavior. preference, utility, indifference curve, budget constraint, optimal consumption plan, demand curve

14.02 Principles of Macroeconomics Problem Set # 2, Answers

Economics 111 Exam 1 Fall 2005 Prof Montgomery

Leader: Shealyn Course: Econ 101 Instructor: Peter Orazem Date: April 17, 2012

Notes on a Basic Business Problem MATH 104 and MATH 184 Mark Mac Lean (with assistance from Patrick Chan) 2011W

Answers to Microeconomics Prelim of August 24, In practice, firms often price their products by marking up a fixed percentage over (average)

Chapter 4 The Theory of Individual Behavior

Open Math in Economics MA National Convention 2017 For each question, E) NOTA indicates that none of the above answers is correct.

CHAPTER 11 TOPICS IN PRICING AND PROFIT ANALYSIS

EconS 301 Intermediate Microeconomics Review Session #4

Transcription:

Impure Public Goods Vani K Borooah University of Ulster

Club Goods A club is a voluntary group of individuals for the shared consumption of one or more goods A club good is one which is: jointly consumed by the members of a club not available for consumption to non-members A club good is subject to congestion: for a given level of provision, the larger the membership, the less the consumption available per member To address the congestion issue, the club operates an exclusion policy

The Club s Decision Problem The club has two basic decisions to make What is the optimal level of provision? What is the optimal level of membership?

Mathematical Analysis There is a private good (quantity, X) and a club good (quantity, G). The size of the membership is S The representative member s utility function is: U = u( X, G, S) U / S < 0, S > S The member tries to maximise utility subject to the resource constraint: R= X + [ C( G, S)/ S]

Mathematical Analysis The cost function is such that: Cost increases with the level of provision: ( C/ G) > 0 Cost increases with the level of membership because of higher maintenance costs: ( C/ S) > 0

Mathematical Analysis Differentiating the Lagrangian function: L = U( XGS,, ) + λ[ R CGS (, )/ S] Yields the first order conditions: MRS MRS XG XS U / G C 1 = = (provision) U / X G S U / S 1 C C( G, S) = = 2 (membership) U / X S S S

Mathematical Analysis The provision condition says that the MRS between the private and club good is equal to the member s share of the marginal cost of provision of the public good The membership condition says that MRS between the private good and membership is equal to the marginal cost of increasing membership: Increased membership increases provision cost Increased membership reduces a member s cost Cross-multiplying the provision condition by S yields the Samuelson condition: MB G = MC G

The Optimal Provision of a Club Good Benefit/Costs per person B(S 1) C(S 1 ) B(S 2) C(S 2 ) The club good is produced under constant returns C(S 1 ) and C(S 2 ) are the costs curves for different membership levels: S 1 < S 2 B(S 1 ) and B(S 2 ) are the corresponding benefit curves G 1 and G 2 are optimal provisions at S 1 and S 2 G 1 G 2 G

The Optimal Level of Membership Benefit/cost per person B(G 2 ) B(G 1 ) C(G 2 ) C(G 1 ) The curves B(G 1 ) and B(G 2 ) show the benefits, for G 1 and G 2 levels of provision, for different levels of membership The curves C(G 1 ) and C(G 2 ) show the costs, for G 1 and G 2 levels of provision, for different levels of membership The optimal levels of membership, S 1 and S 2, maximise the distance between the benefit and cost curves S 1 S 2 S

Optimal Level of Provision and Membership S * G(S) S(G) G(S) shows the optimal level of provision for different levels of membership S(G) shows the optimal membership level for different levels of provision The equilibrium level of provision and membership are given at the point of intersection For stability, the S(G) curve should be flatter than the G(S) curve G *

Community Size and the Tiebout Hypothesis Suppose that the clubs represent local communities The club good is a package of health, education, transport etc. supplied to the local population For each community there is an optimal population, S *, which will maximise the net benefit from a package If S > S *, people will leave the community If S < S *, people will enter the community People will vote with their feet (Tiebout)

Fishing Example Fishermen Total Average Marginal 1 10 10 10 2 18 9 8 3 24 8 6 4 28 7 4 5 30 6 2 6 30 5 0

Tragedy of the Commons Suppose the price of fish is 1 per fish and the outside wage is 6 Then 5 fishermen will use the lake: outside wage = average product But, from society s perspective, only 3 fishermen should use the lake: fishermen 4 and 5 would be better employed outside the fishing industry http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/tragedy_of_the_commo ns http://dieoff.org/page95.htm

Congestion Without Exclusion There are N profit maximising firms, indexed i=1 N, each firm having access to a fishing ground Each firm has a fishing fleet of size R i where: R=ΣR i is the size of the industry fleet The total catch of the industry is: Y=f(R) The total catch of each firm is: Y i =(R i /R)f(R)=(R i /[R i + R])f(R i + R) where: R=R-R i is the other firms aggregate fleet

The Industry The industry will maximise profits by choosing the fleet size, R, to maximise: Π=p f(r) - q R where: p is the price of fish and q is the price of a fishing boat Setting p=1, the optimal value, R *, is given by the condition: f (R)=q

Industry Equilbrium q MR, MC f (R) R * is the size of industry s profit maximising fleet Y * =f(r * ) is the optimal catch Π * =Y * -qr * =f(r * )-qr * is maximum profits R * R

The Firm Each firm will choose R i to maximise its profits: Π = pr ( /[ R+ R]) f( R+ R) qr i i i i i Differentiating the profit function wrt R i and (assuming the firms are all of equal size) setting to zero yields: q= ( R/ R) ( f( R)/ R) + ( R / R) f ( R) N 1 f( R) 1 = + N R N i f ( R)

Firm Equilibrium MC, MP, AP Industry equilibrium Firm equilibrium q Average Marginal R * R ** R The firm in equilibrium equates q to a weighted average of average product and marginal product When the number of firms N is very large (N ): q = average product When the marginal falls, the average falls When the average is falling, the marginal lies below the average So, over fishing will result: the red triangle measures the loss to society from over fishing

Property Rights Over fishing arises because of an absence of property rights Since no one owns the fishing ground it is a common property resource firms can fish without cost One solution is to assign property rights and to impose a charge per fishing boat

Firm Equilibrium with Tax MC, MP, AP q * q Firm equilibrium after tax Firm equilibrium before tax Marginal A tax per fishing boat is imposed: q * -q= AP(R * )-MP(R * ) This raises the cost per boat from q to q * When firms are in equilibrium, there will a total of R * boats R * R ** R

Appendix Π ( R + R) R R 1. = f ( R) + f ( R) q R R + R R + R i i i i 2 i ( i ) ( i ) R f( R) Ri = + f ( R) q= 0 R R R f( R) f ( R) R f( R) 2. d / dr< 0 < 0 2 R R f( R) f ( R) < R