NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DANIEL T. NAWAZELSKI LEAD-LAG STUDY EXHIBIT DTN-1. New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission

Similar documents
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DAVID L. CHONG

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY DOCKET NO. R Direct Testimony of Jeffrey L.

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF LAURENCE M. BROCK

ORIGINAL C~s~ ~o~z2~- ii_o~ g STATE OF NEW HAMPSH ~

STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BEFORE THE HONORABLE WALTER J. BRASWELL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. Docket No. DE 17-

SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEVEN P. DAIS (WORKING CASH) October 6, 2017 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN (WORKING CASH) APRIL 6, 2018

REVISED PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JACK S. LEWIS ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JACK S. LEWIS ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

ow State of New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission Application of Abenaki Water Company For Approval of a Rate Adjustment

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

UNITIL ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC NEW HAMPSHIRE FILING REQUIREMENT SCHEDULES TABLE OF CONTENTS

Schedule Lead Lag Schedules Schedule Document No. Attachment SPB-8 Pages Pages Type

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

UNITIL ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF TODD M. BOHAN. New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission. Docket No. DE

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation d/b/a National Grid

Stephen P. St. Cyr & Associates 17 Sky Oaks Drive


BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY DOCKET NO. R Direct Testimony of Kevin M.

Attachment 3 - PECO Statement No. 2 Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Alan B. Cohn

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PANEL

PUBLIC VERSION WORKPAPERS TO PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION : : : : ORDER

STEPHEN P. ST. CYR & Assoc.

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO DIRECT TESTIMONY OF TYSON D. PORTER REGULATORY ANALYST.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY DOCKET NO. R Direct Testimony of Kevin M.

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY Docket No. R Direct Testimony of Richard A.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Public Service Company of Colorado ) Docket No.

National Grid. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation INVESTIGATION AS TO THE PROPRIETY OF PROPOSED ELECTRIC TARIFF CHANGES. Testimony and Exhibits of:

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC DIRECT TESTIMONY OF PAUL M. NORMAND

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JONATHAN B. ATUN CHAPTER 4 ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

Testimony Experience of Timothy S. Lyons

RR16 - Page 1 of

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY RUTH M. SAKYA.

RR1 - Page 181 of 518

RR9 - Page 229 of 510

Rocky Mountain Power Docket No Witness: Bruce N. Williams BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. Docket No. DG 14- Liberty Utilities (EnergyNorth Natural Gas) Corp.

STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BEFORE HONORABLE IRENE JONES, ALJ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

EXETER ASSOCIATES, INC Little Patuxent Parkway Suite 300 Columbia, Maryland 21044

DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS

FILED JUL COURT CLERK'S OFFICE - OKC CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA

Mrs. Metts. Volume 1 Tab 9

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION PREPARED TESTIMONY DON MALONE PUBLIC UTILITY AUDITOR ON BEHALF OF THE STAFF OF THE

STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

January Submitted to: State of Rhode lsland and Providence Plantations Public Utilities Commission. RIPUC Docket No.

STATE OF ALASKA BEFORE THE REGULATORY COMMISSION OF ALASKA. Paul F. Lisankie T.W. Patch Norman Rokeberg Janis W. Wilson

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY RICHARD R. SCHRUBBE. on behalf of

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY DOCKET NO. R

Docket No Twenty-First Set of Data Requests of the Division of Public Utilities and Carriers to National Grid February 2, 2018

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No. R Direct Testimony of Richard A.

PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION UNITED WATER PENNSYLVANIA, INC. Docket No. R Direct Testimony. Lisa A. Boyd

Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC Docket No. RP Exhibit No. TPC-0079

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION

BUSA PRACTICAL ACCOUNTING I/II Entiat High School

Docket No Twenty-First Set of Data Requests of the Division of Public Utilities and Carriers to National Grid February 2, 2018

STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

2 BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. 8 Proceedings held in the above-entitled. 9 matter before Sharon L. Feldman, Administrative Law Judge

PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY. Pennsylvania Electric Company Statement of Reasons for Rate Changes

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 1 ) Unitil Corporation ("Unitil") and Northern utilities, Inc. ("Northern") ("Joint

RR9 - Page 356 of 510

TURN Data Request Number 1 A SoCalGas Response

STATE OF CONNECTICUT PUBLIC UTILITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY DOCKET NO

CHAPTER 4 COST RECOVERY AND REGULATORY TREATMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARRY G. YEE ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY JANNELL E. MARKS. on behalf of

I. INTRODUCTION. A. My name is Barry F. Blackwell and my business address is 1000 East Main Street, Q. BY WHOM ARE YOU EMPLOYED AND IN WHAT CAPACITY?

In this Order, the Commission directs Eversource to adopt a cost allocation policy for

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JEFFREY C.

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RYAN HOM (UPDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS REPORT) January 2018

UGI UTILITIES, INC. GAS DIVISION

REVISED WORKPAPERS TO PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RONALD M. VAN DER LEEDEN ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

BEFORE THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS. DOUG LITTLE, Chairman BOB STUMP BOB BURNS TOM FORESE ANDY TOBIN

BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

Accounting 3 4. Course Outline. Board Approved: October 10, I. Course Information. A. Course Title: Accounting 3-4. B. Course Code Number: BU143

CHAPTER IV DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

STATE OF CONNECTICUT PUBLIC UTILITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY DOCKET NO

STATE OF ALASKA BEFORE THE REGULATORY COMMISSION OF ALASKA ) ) ) ) ) PREFILED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DANIEL M. DIECKGRAEFF

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY RUTH M. SAKYA.

STATE OF ALASKA. Kate Giard Paul F. Lisankie T.W. Patch Janis W. Wilson

THE YORK WATER COMPANY York, PA

KEEGAN WERLIN LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 265 FRANKLIN STREET BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS March 17, 2014

STATE OF CONNECTICUT PUBLIC UTILITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY DOCKET NO

RR16 - Page 57 of

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEVEN D. ROETGER, WILLIAM R. JACOBS, JR PH.D, MARK D. RAUCKHORST AND DAVID P. POROCH,

Chapter 23 Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations Study Guide Solutions Fill-in-the-Blank Equations. Exercises

Transcription:

NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DANIEL T. NAWAZELSKI LEAD-LAG STUDY EXHIBIT DTN- New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission Docket No. DG -00 000

Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... II. SUMMARY OF TESTIMONY... III. CASH WORKING CAPITAL... IV. SUMMARY... SCHEDULES Schedule DTN- Schedule Workpapers Pro Forma Lead-Lag Summary Supporting Lead-Lag Schedules 0000

Docket No. DG -00 Page of I. INTRODUCTION Q. Please state your name and business address. A. Daniel T. Nawazelski, Liberty Lane West, Hampton, New Hampshire 0. 0 Q. What is your position and what are your responsibilities? A. I am a Senior Financial Analyst for Unitil Service Corp., a subsidiary of Unitil Corporation that provides managerial, financial, regulatory and engineering services to Unitil Corporation s principal subsidiaries including the New Hampshire Division of Northern Utilities, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Northern or the Company ). In this capacity I perform complex financial planning, forecasting and analyses for financial matters and in support of regulatory proceedings. Q. Please describe your business and educational background. A. I began working for Unitil Service Corp. in June of 0 as an Associate Financial Analyst. Since then I have been promoted two times, the most recent promotion was to the role of Senior Financial Analyst in 0. I earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Business with a concentration in Finance and Operations Management from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst in May of 0. Q. Have you previously testified before this Commission? 000

Docket No. DG -00 Page of A. Yes, I have testified and provided default service lead lag studies before the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (the Commission ) in Dockets DE - 0 and DE -0. I have also testified before the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities on other utility financial and ratemaking matters. II. SUMMARY OF TESTIMONY 0 0 Q. Please discuss the purpose of your testimony. A. The purpose of my direct testimony is to present and sponsor the cash working capital ( CWC ) requirements of Northern for its delivery and purchased gas services. Northern has identified its revenue requirements on a pro forma basis and I have computed the CWC for that adjusted test year. On a pro forma basis, the total CWC requirement for Northern is. net lag days for its delivery services. This CWC requirement represents the funds that are needed due to the lag between the times that payments are made by the Company and when the recovery of those funds is obtained from customers. The CWC requirement for delivery services is included in the Company s overall revenue requirements calculation by means of the cash working capital allowance included in rate base. In addition to presenting and sponsoring the CWC requirements for delivery service, I have also calculated 0.0 net lag days for purchased gas. The results of this study will be used to calculate the purchased gas working capital costs to be 000

Docket No. DG -00 Page of recovered through the Cost of Gas Adjustment. This change would become effective on the same date as the base rate change in this proceeding. My analysis is supported by the data presented in Schedule DTN- Q. How is your testimony organized? A. My testimony consists of three sections. Section I is introductory information. Section II describes the purpose and organization of my testimony. Section III presents the results of the Company s lead-lag study that I ve prepared to determine the pro forma delivery portion of CWC. 0 III. CASH WORKING CAPITAL Q. Please define cash working capital. A. CWC is the amount of investor-supplied capital required to fund the day-to-day operations of a company after accounting for the timing differences between booked and actual revenues and expenses. CWC represents dollar amounts funded by investors to provide service prior to receipt of payment for those services by customers. As such, CWC is an appropriate addition to a company s rate base. Q. Did you perform analyses to estimate the CWC of Northern for the adjusted test year? 000

Docket No. DG -00 Page of A. Yes. Schedule DTN- summarizes the results of Northern s lead-lag study using the pro forma revenue requirements for the test year ending December, 0. As shown in these schedules, the rate base addition for the delivery portion of CWC is $,,, or a net lag of. days. 0 Q. What is a lead-lag study? A. A lead-lag study is an analysis to determine the funding required to operate a company on a day-to-day basis. A lead-lag study compares () the timing difference between the receipt of service by customers and their subsequent payment for these same services and () the timing difference between the incurrence of costs by Northern and its subsequent payment of these costs. Therefore, a lead-lag study must compute both a revenue lag (or lead) and an expense (lead) or lag. Schedule DTN-, page of summarizes the lead-lag study results for Northern. The CWC was developed using systematic reviews of cash flows for Northern s revenues and operating expenses. The lead-lag study I ve performed measured the base revenue requirement CWC needed for Northern s day-to-day gas operations for the -month pro forma period ending December, 0. 0 Q. Please define the terms lag days and lead days as used in your testimony. A. Revenue lag is measured as the number of days between delivery of service to Northern s customers until the time payment is received from customers. Because Northern s gas customers receive service prior to paying for it, the 000

Docket No. DG -00 Page of 0 Company experiences a revenue lag in daily operations. The longer the revenue lag, the greater the length of time that investor capital is required to fund the Company s day-to-day operations. The revenue lag for Northern is. days as developed in Schedule DTN-, page of, line. Expense lag is the number of days from the time of service is provided to the Company until payment is made by the Company for that service. On occasion, the Company pays for services before they are provided as an example. In these instances, the expenses lead their service period and the expense lag is expressed as a negative amount. Consequently, any increase in the number of expense lag days results in a reduction of the amount of working capital required for ongoing Northern operations. The difference between the revenue lag and the expense lag determines if there is a net revenue lag (revenue lag days are greater than the expense lag days for a component) or a net expense lead (revenue lag days are less than the expense lag days for a component). As shown on Schedule DTN-, page of, line, column, Northern s net lag days are. days. 0 Q. Please describe the approach you use in preparing your lead-lag study. A. I began the lead-lag study with the selection of the per-books revenues and expenses for the -month period ended December, 0 for Northern to form the basis for my analysis. I then determined the lag days in the recovery of 000

Docket No. DG -00 Page of 0 revenue by type of revenue (i.e. sales and other revenues). For operating and maintenance ( O&M ) expenses, I developed lag days for each of several types of expenses (i.e. labor, employee benefits, liability insurance, regulatory commission expenses, automobile leases, service company charges, and other O&M expenses). In addition, I developed lag days for property taxes, other taxes and income taxes. Once the lag days for the test year are established on a per-books basis, they are applied to the test year pro forma revenue requirements. The lead or lag days for each of the items described above are then multiplied by the test year pro forma expenses to determine the dollar-days of CWC. The net dollardays of revenue less expenses and taxes are then divided by days to obtain the average daily CWC. 0 Q. Please describe your calculation of revenue lags. A. The calculation of the revenue lags is summarized on page of Schedule DTN-. As previously described, revenue lag is the length of time that occurs between the Company s provision of service to its customers and the subsequent receipt of payment for those services. The existence of a revenue lag makes it necessary for investors to provide the funding for the Company to pay its operating costs during the lag period. The measurement of revenue lag typically consists of three components: () service lag, () billing lag, and () collection lag. Since the time periods for these three components are mutually exclusive, revenue lag is computed by adding 000

Docket No. DG -00 Page of together the total number of days associated with each of the three components. This total number of lag days represents the amount of time between the recorded delivery of service to customers and the receipt of the related revenues from customers. 0 Q. Please describe how you calculate service lag. A. The service lag is the average time span between the mid-point of the customer s consumption interval, also known as the usage period, and the time that such usage is recorded by the Company for billing purposes. This service period determines the average length of time over which the billed services are provided and establishes a common point in time from which to measure () the time of reimbursement for the billed services, and () the time at which the accrued costs for the service period are actually paid. For virtually all utilities, the service lag is one-half of an average month or. days (//). 0 Q. Please describe the calculation of billing lag. A. The billing lag is the time required to process and send out customer bills. The billing lag begins at the end of the service period when customer consumption is metered, and it ends when the bills are rendered and billings are posted to accounts receivable. Northern utilizes an automated meter reading system. It posts its meter reading daily for billing the next day, and it is recorded into accounts receivable on the following day. The Northern billing lag was approximately.0 days after considering the delay for weekends and holidays. 000

Docket No. DG -00 Page of 0 Q. Please describe the calculation of collection lag. A. The collection lag identifies the time delay between the posting of customer bills to accounts receivable and the receipt of these billed revenues. Collection lag begins with the posting of bills and ends with the receipt of payment. Collection lag may be influenced by payment arrangements, contract terms, postal delivery delays, customer inquiries, delinquent accounts, service termination practices, and other factors. I have employed the accounts receivable turnover ratio method to determine the collection lags. Using this approach, the average monthly accounts receivable balances were divided by the average daily revenues for the months ended December, 0. Using the accounts receivable turnover method, a collection lag of 0.0 days was computed. Q. Are there other components of revenue lag for Northern? A. Yes, please see page of Schedule DTN-. This lists miscellaneous revenues such as late payment charges, reconnect fees, etc. Q. What is the total revenue lag component for the lead-lag calculation? A. Each of the above revenue lag components was totaled to arrive at the total revenue lag of. days, as shown on Schedule DTN-, page. 0 Q. How is the lag for labor expense determined? A. Please see Schedule DTN-. The Company s payroll stems from weekly or monthly payroll disbursements. Using sample data, I measured the lag between 000

Docket No. DG -00 Page of 0 the mid-point of the pay period and the pay date. However, not all labor costs earned by employees in the pay period are paid out as salary, the difference being payroll withholdings. In order to make an accurate calculation of total labor costs, I identified all labor-related costs and identified when the Company actually expended the cash. These labor-related costs include all salary including incentive compensation, payroll taxes including withholding taxes, and a wide range of benefits. Regular weekly payroll costs are the largest component of labor costs and have the shortest payment lag. However, other components of labor costs have relatively longer delays. For example, incentive compensation pay was earned from January 0 to December 0 and was paid in February 0, resulting in a much longer expense lag. In addition to direct labor expense, we examined other labor-related costs to the Company, including Payroll Taxes, and Pensions as discussed below. 0 Q. Please describe how the lag is calculated for Pensions? A. The method for calculating expense lags for Pensions utilizes a benefit payments approach. For each benefit payment, the service period and its mid-point were determined. Then the payment date was established. The lag was then computed as the difference between the payment date and the mid-point of the service period. Next, a weighted average of each benefit payment was computed to determine the overall average for this category. 000

Docket No. DG -00 Page 0 of Q. Were other categories of O&M expense analyzed separately and included in the expense lag? A. Yes, liability insurance, regulatory commission expenses, vehicle leases, credit card fees and IRP expenses were analyzed separately and included in the calculations of the expense lag. Again, the lags for each expense item were computed as the difference between the payment date and the mid-point of the service period. 0 Q. How was the expense lag calculated for expenses allocated from the Service Companies? A. The expenses allocated from the Service Companies consisted of Labor and Other O&M expenses that are charged to O&M accounts. The expense lag of 0. days that is assigned to this expense was computed as the difference between the payment date for Service Company charges, and the mid-point of the service period, which is the mid-point of the calendar month being billed. 0 Q. How is Uncollectible Accounts expense included in the lead-lag study? A. Uncollectible Accounts expense for base revenues was not assigned lead or lag days in the study because it is a non-cash item. The lag for uncollectible accounts has been recognized in the calculation of the collection lag. The accounts receivable balance is reduced when uncollectible accounts are written off, and therefore, the collection lag is reduced. 0000

Docket No. DG -00 Page of 0 Q. Are there any Other O&M expenses that were included in the calculation of expense lag? A. Yes, there are Other O&M expenses directly paid by Northern. Because these expenses are made up of thousands of vouchers processed throughout the course of the test year, a sample was used to estimate the lags for each Operating Company. The sample produced a lag of. days for these Other O&M direct expenses. The sampling method used was a random sequential sample of the population using four () strata. The population was sorted by dollar amounts, and the following strata were used for the sample: Stratum Largest vouchers Stratum Every rd voucher down to $,00 Stratum Every th voucher down to $0 Stratum Every 00 th voucher under $0 The resulting sample accounted for.% of the dollars in the population and resulted in a lag of. days for the Other O&M expenses. 0 Q. Did you include any other expenses besides O&M expenses in the calculation of the expense lag? A. Yes. Since Property Taxes, Other Taxes and Federal and State Income Taxes, represent cash outlays, they were included in the fiscal 0 period in the calculation of CWC. All property tax payments made during 0 were analyzed, 000

Docket No. DG -00 Page of and the expense lags computed. Other Taxes consist mostly of Payroll Taxes and Unemployment Taxes. Each type of tax was analyzed separately and assigned a lag based on the service periods and payments dates. Federal and State Income Taxes were assigned lags based on the statutory required fiscal tax year equal tax payments. 0 Q. Did you compute the CWC requirements on any expenses not recovered in base rates? A. Yes, I did. The CWC percent was calculated for purchased gas expenses. The purchased gas expenses were analyzed for 0 for each supplier. The lags for each supplier payment were computed as the difference between the payment date and the mid-point of the service period. This produced a purchased gas expense lag of. days, as shown on page of Schedule DTN-. This page also computes the revenue lag of. days. The resulting net lag is 0.0 days. Q. Where have you presented the results of the CWC calculations for the pro forma test year? A. The results of the lead-lag study are summarized on page of Schedule DTN-. This page summarizes the revenue lags from page and the expense lags from page and presents the Company s CWC for the test year on a pro forma basis. Schedule DTN-, page, summarizes the purchased gas CWC. 000

Docket No. DG -00 Page of 0 Q. Have you identified the net lag days between revenue and expense for Northern for the twelve months ended December, 0 on a pro forma basis? A. Yes. As indicated by the data on page of Schedule DTN-, the net lag for CWC is. days (line, column ). The positive lag indicates that CWC is required to compensate for the fact that the lag in the recovery of revenues is greater than the lag in the payment of expenses. On a pro forma basis, Northern s CWC requirement for December, 0 test year is $,,, or.%, as shown on page, lines and,of the above noted schedule. This CWC requirement represents the capital that must be provided and included as an addition to rate base. Q. Please explain how the CWC requirement impacts the Company s revenue requirement as described in Mr. Chong s testimony and in the RevReq schedules. A. Mr. Chong s RevReq schedule includes a CWC requirement of $,, as shown on Schedule RevReq--. This amount was based on a net lag of. days. IV. SUMMARY Q. Please summarize your testimony. 000

Docket No. DG -00 Page of 0 A. I have prepared a lead-lag study for Northern to compute the lag days associated with revenues and expenses. These revenue and expense lag days are offset to determine the net lags. I then used these net lag days to compute the pro forma CWC requirement for the Company. The resulting CWC requirement for the Company is based on a net lag of. days for the rate case test year January, 0 through December, 0. The results of the purchased gas working capital study of 0.0 net lag days will be used to calculate the purchased gas working capital costs to be recovered through the Cost of Gas Adjustment. This change would become effective on the same date as the base rate change in this proceeding. Q. Does this conclude your testimony? A. Yes, it does. 000