MINING AND MINERALS AND INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION

Similar documents
ALERT MINING & MINERALS ISSUE IN THIS

ALERT DISPUTE RESOLUTION ISSUE IN THIS 22 MARCH 2018 AN UPDATE: YOUR DEBTS.WRITTEN OFF?

MINING AND MINERALS ALERT

ALERT REAL ESTATE AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION ISSUE IN THIS 6 APRIL 2016

ALERT DISPUTE RESOLUTION ISSUE IN THIS 13 APRIL 2016

ALERT DISPUTE RESOLUTION ISSUE IN THIS 8 FEBRUARY 2016 OVERVIEW OF THE DRAFT FRANCHISE INDUSTRY CODE PUBLISHED IN JANUARY 2016

ALERT DISPUTE RESOLUTION ISSUE IN THIS 26 OCTOBER 2016 CORPORATE INVESTIGATIONS: HAVE YOU NOTICED THE GLOBAL CHANGE IN COMBATING CORRUPTION?

ALERT DISPUTE RESOLUTION ISSUE IN THIS 1 MARCH 2017 BUSINESS RESCUE, RESTRUCTURING AND INSOLVENCY:

ALERT DISPUTE RESOLUTION ISSUE IN THIS 31 JANUARY 2018 INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION: DAVOS 2018 DECONSTRUCTED: SOUTH AFRICA S SHARE IN A FRACTURED WORLD?

ALERT DISPUTE RESOLUTION ISSUE IN THIS 7 SEPTEMBER 2016 COMMERCIAL: INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION:

MINING & MINERALS cliffedekkerhofmeyr.com

ALERT DISPUTE RESOLUTION ISSUE IN THIS 24 JANUARY 2018 IS IT POSSIBLE THAT IN 2018 YOUR DEBTS MAY BE WRITTEN OFF? SURROGACY - TOO MUCH TO BEAR?

PRACTICE OVERVIEW ABOUT CLIFFE DEKKER HOFMEYR

ALERT DISPUTE RESOLUTION ISSUE IN THIS 21 JUNE 2017

ALERT DISPUTE RESOLUTION ISSUE IN THIS 9 MARCH 2016 INTRICACIES OF CROSS BORDER INSOLVENCY AND ITS APPLICATION IN SOUTH AFRICAN COURTS

ALERT DISPUTE RESOLUTION ISSUE IN THIS 27 JULY 2016 ADMINISTRATIVE AND PUBLIC LAW: CORPORATE INVESTIGATIONS:

ALERT DISPUTE RESOLUTION ISSUE IN THIS 5 OCTOBER 2016 INSURANCE LAW: BUSINESS RESCUE, RESTRUCTURING AND INSOLVENCY: THE REAL HEAT OF VELDFIRES

ALERT DISPUTE RESOLUTION ISSUE IN THIS 3 OCTOBER 2018 A TENDER TO PAY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE PERFORMANCE BUT...

MINING & MINERALS ISSUE IN THIS 30 OCTOBER 2018 MINING COMMUNITY CONSULTATION: WHO IS THE COMMUNITY?

DISPUTE RESOLUTION: CORPORATE INVESTIGATIONS AND EMPLOYMENT

CORPORATE INVESTIGATIONS

BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT ALERT

BUSINESS RESCUE, RESTRUCTURING & INSOLVENCY

CORPORATE & COMMERCIAL

ALERT EXCHANGE CONTROL ISSUE IN THIS 17 NOVEMBER NO TRADE, NO DEDUCTION A JUDGMENT ABOUT SECTION 11(a) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT

TAX AND EXCHANGE CONTROL ALERT

TAX AND EXCHANGE CONTROL ALERT

ALERT TAX AND EXCHANGE CONTROL ISSUE IN THIS 4 MARCH 2016

ALERT TAX ISSUE IN THIS 13 NOVEMBER 2015 OUR NEW TEAM MEMBERS TAX CONSEQUENCES OF A LIQUIDATION DISTRIBUTION FOLLOWED BY AN AMALGAMATION TRANSACTION

EMPLOYMENT ISSUE IN THIS 5 DECEMBER 2018 INCREASED MINIMUM WAGE FOR DOMESTIC WORKERS

ALERT TAX AND EXCHANGE CONTROL ISSUE IN THIS SPECIAL EDITION: VAT AND NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS 19 MAY 2017

TAX & EXCHANGE CONTROL

ALERT EXCHANGE CONTROL ISSUE IN THIS 26 JANUARY 2018 DID THE PUNISHMENT FIT THE CRIME? THE TAX COURT REDUCES AN UNDERSTATEMENT PENALTY IMPOSED BY SARS

TAX & EXCHANGE CONTROL

ALERT EXCHANGE CONTROL ISSUE IN THIS 13 NOVEMBER 2017 VAT RULINGS HOW AND WHEN TO APPLY CUSTOMS HIGHLIGHTS

ALERT EXCHANGE CONTROL ISSUE IN THIS 23 FEBRUARY 2018 VAT RATE INCREASE: WHAT VAT RATE SHOULD BE CHARGED?

IN THIS ISSUE INSURANCE

TAX AND EXCHANGE CONTROL ALERT

ALERT TAX ISSUE IN THIS 23 OCTOBER 2015 CHANGES TO THE INCOME TAX RETURN FOR TRUSTS

TAX AND EXCHANGE CONTROL ALERT

TAX AND EXCHANGE CONTROL ALERT

ALERT TAX ISSUE IN THIS 20 NOVEMBER 2015 THE ONUS OF PROOF RULE FOR THE IMPOSITION OF UNDERSTATEMENT PENALTIES CARBON TAX IN SOUTH AFRICA

EMPLOYMENT ISSUE IN THIS 4 JUNE 2018 DROP IN THE PRESCRIBED RATE OF INTEREST THE RIGHT TO A FAIR HEARING IS A TWO-WAY STREET

CORPORATE & COMMERCIAL

ALERT EXCHANGE CONTROL ISSUE IN THIS 26 OCTOBER 2018 GOOD NEWS FOR LENDERS? FURTHER PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE DOUBTFUL DEBT PROVISIONS

TAX AND EXCHANGE CONTROL ALERT

ALERT TAX ISSUE IN THIS 29 JANUARY 2016 RULING ON THIRD-PARTY BACKED SHARES PRESERVATION ORDERS - THE COURT SETS A HIGH BAR FOR SARS

ALERT EXCHANGE CONTROL ISSUE IN THIS 24 NOVEMBER 2017 ANNOUNCEMENT OF FURTHER REVISIONS TO THE DEBT REDUCTION RULES IN THE INCOME TAX ACT

LEGAL PARTNER FOR YOUR FUND

ALERT TAX ISSUE IN THIS 6 NOVEMBER 2015 INTEREST FOR PURPOSES OF WITHHOLDING TAX ON INTEREST (WTI)

ALERT TAX AND EXCHANGE CONTROL ISSUE IN THIS 8 APRIL 2016

ALERT TRUSTS AND ESTATES ISSUE IN THIS 20 JULY 2016

ALERT REAL ESTATE ISSUE IN THIS 19 MARCH 2018

ALERT TAX ISSUE IN THIS 4 SEPTEMBER 2015 VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE RELIEF TO BE WIDENED DAVIS TAX COMMITTEE: FIRST INTERIM REPORT ON MINING

ALERT FINANCE AND BANKING ISSUE IN THIS 20 FEBRUARY 2017 NEW LIMITS FOR CREDIT LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUMS

TAX AND EXCHANGE CONTROL ALERT

TAX & EXCHANGE CONTROL

ALERT FINANCE & BANKING ISSUE IN THIS 15 JANUARY 2018 RECOVERING PRESCRIBED DEBTS - SECTION 126 OF THE NATIONAL CREDIT ACT

FINANCE & BANKING ISSUE IN THIS 22 JANUARY 2019 UPDATE: NO MORE SILENT BIG SHORT POSITIONS

TAX AND EXCHANGE CONTROL ALERT

ALERT FINANCE & BANKING ISSUE IN THIS 27 JUNE 2018

TAX & EXCHANGE CONTROL

ALERT 25 JULY 2014 IN THIS ISSUE TAX CONTRIBUTED TAX CAPITAL IN A COMPANY CONTEXT

ALERT 13 JUNE 2014 IN THIS ISSUE TAX INVITATION TO SEMINAR: TO PREF OR NOT TO PREF

TAX AND EXCHANGE CONTROL ALERT

ALERT COMPETITION ISSUE IN THIS 30 MAY 2016

ALERT COMPETITION ISSUE IN THIS 5 MARCH 2018

TAX AND EXCHANGE CONTROL ALERT

COMPETITION ISSUE IN THIS 8 OCTOBER 2018 THE COMPETITION LAW RISKS OF EARLY INTEGRATION PLANNING

ALERT 30 MAY 2014 IN THIS ISSUE TAX

TAX AND EXCHANGE CONTROL ALERT

The team is described as great to work with and as one that routinely produces work of the highest calibre.

ALERT TAX AND EXCHANGE CONTROL ISSUE IN THIS 8 SEPTEMBER 2017 THE BEPS EFFECT - HAS LORD TOMLIN S FAMOUS 1936 DICTUM BECOME OBSOLETE?

ALERT EXCHANGE CONTROL ISSUE IN THIS 19 JANUARY 2018 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DEVELOPERS FACE CASH FLOW CRUNCH DUE TO VAT ON TEMPORARY LETTING OF UNITS

ALERT EXCHANGE CONTROL ISSUE IN THIS 16 MARCH 2018

FROM POWERFUL PARTNERSHIPS COME POWERFUL SOLUTIONS. Budget Pocket Guide 2018/2019 TAX & EXCHANGE CONTROL

ALERT 7 MARCH 2014 IN THIS ISSUE TAX VALUE SHIFTING ARRANGEMENTS STILL APPLICABLE TO COMPANIES AND TRIGGERING ADVERSE TAX IMPLICATIONS

CORPORATE AND COMMERCIAL. 29 January 2014 IN THIS ISSUE

AFRICA PRACTICE. Abidjan, Cote d Ivoire

ALERT 02 MAY 2014 IN THIS ISSUE TAX SUCCESSIVE CORPORATE

CONCERNS RAISED ON INTEREST DEDUCTION LIMITATION RULES

TAX AND EXCHANGE CONTROL ALERT

ALERT EXCHANGE CONTROL ISSUE IN THIS 23 MARCH 2018 DOMESTIC TREASURY MANAGEMENT COMPANIES

TAX ALERT REGISTRATION OF AN EXTERNAL COMPANY IN THIS ISSUE 25 MAY Registration of an external company. No more exit charge? EVERYTHING MATTERS

TAX ALERT. We have launched a new Tax website. Click here to visit the site. IN THIS ISSUE FAR REACHING DECISION BY THE TAX COURT 5 AUGUST 2011

ALERT COMPETITION ISSUE IN THIS 13 APRIL 2016 COMPETITION COMMISSION REJECTS EXEMPTION APPLICATIONS LITTLE PIG, LITTLE PIG, LET ME IN

ALERT TAX AND EXCHANGE CONTROL ISSUE IN THIS

HMI'S HEALTHCARE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK DOCUMENT OF 1 DECEMBER 2017 / MEDICLINIC'S SUBMISSIONS

ALERT 20 JUNE 2014 IN THIS ISSUE TAX ADMINISTRATIVE FAIRNESS IN RAISING ASSESSMENTS AND DISPUTES BEFORE THE TAX COURT

TAX ALERT IN THIS ISSUE THE ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE PROGRAMME ANY QUESTIONS? COME DISCUSS THEM WITH SARS AT OUR OFFICES

TAX PRESERVATION ORDERS IN THIS ISSUE. ALERT l 17 OCTOBER 2014 PRESERVATION ORDERS SARS MUST CHOOSE ITS REMEDIES

TAX AND EXCHANGE CONTROL ALERT

TAX & EXCHANGE CONTROL

ALERT EMPLOYMENT 8 SEPTEMBER 2014 THE LAST LEG: CONSTITUTIONAL COURT FINDS THAT SAPS DECISION TO NOT PROMOTE BARNARD WAS NOT UNLAWFUL IN THIS ISSUE

WELCOME TO OUR SPECIAL BUDGET SUMMARY 2015 THE INFLUENCE OF THE DAVIS COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET

MATTERS COMPETITION IN THIS ISSUE TRIBUNAL RULES ON INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION IN PIONEER FISHING CASE

EMPLOYMENT MATTERS 14 APRIL 2014 IN THIS ISSUE SHOULD A CERTIFICATE OF OUTCOME BE REVIEWED?

TAX & EXCHANGE CONTROL

TAX ALERT. 26 April 2013 VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE UNDER THE TAX ADMINISTRATION ACT IN THIS ISSUE

ADDRESS BY MINISTER OF MINERAL RESOURCES, MOSEBENZI ZWANE (MP) AT THE BLACK BUSINESS COUNCIL (BBC) BUSINESS BREAKFAST, 18 TH AUGUST 2017

Transcription:

22 JUNE 2016 MINING AND MINERALS AND INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION ALERT IN THIS ISSUE LOCAL CONTENT REQUIREMENTS IN THE EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRY: A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD Balancing the need for regulation promoting sustainable economic development through foreign direct investment in certain sectors of an economy becomes difficult where a countries international investment and trade law obligations prohibit or restrict the domestic imposition of quantitative and qualitative restrictions on the import of goods or services in such sector. 1 MINING AND MINERALS AND INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION ALERT 22 June 2016

LOCAL CONTENT REQUIREMENTS IN THE EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRY: A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD Balancing the need for regulation promoting sustainable economic development through foreign direct investment in certain sectors of an economy becomes difficult where a countries international investment and trade law obligations prohibit or restrict the domestic imposition of quantitative and qualitative restrictions on the import of goods or services in such sector. South Africa has recognised that, except for encouraging downstream value-addition (beneficiation) in the minerals sector, policy tools and regulatory frameworks must be implemented to ensure that the extractive industry provides broader benefits to society. South Africa (similar to other countries endowed with mineral resources) has recognised that, except for encouraging downstream value-addition (beneficiation) in the minerals sector, policy tools and regulatory frameworks must be implemented to ensure that the extractive industry provides broader benefits to society. The draft Reviewed Mining Charter (Reviewed Mining Charter) released for public comment on 15 April 2016 by the Minister of Mineral Resources (Minister) reaffirms the South African government s commitment to ensure that, from a local content perspective, any holder of a mining right will be obliged to source a certain percentage of its capital and consumable goods from South African businesses (as is already the case in terms of the current Mining Charter, despite a lower threshold). The Reviewed Mining Charter records the following: Enterprise development and local procurement are one of the key instruments to achieve both competitiveness and transformation of the mining industry. It also presents opportunities to expand economic growth that allows for the creation of decent jobs and widens scope for market access of South African capital goods, consumer goods and services. To achieve this, a mining right holder must ensure that procurement policies and actual procurement is aligned to the following: Capital goods (a) A mining right holder must procure a minimum of 60% locally manufactured capital goods from BEE compliant manufacturing companies. (b) 30% of the above 60% must preferably be given to small business development which are BEE compliant, a minimum of 10% of the 30% must be reserved for BEE compliant enterprise development. Consumables (a) A mining right holder must procure a minimum of 70% of locally manufactured consumables from BEE compliant manufacturing companies. (b) A minimum of 30% of the 70% must be given to small business development which are BEE compliant, a minimum of 10% of the 30% must be reserved for BEE compliant enterprise development. 2 MINING AND MINERALS AND INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION ALERT 22 June 2016

LOCAL CONTENT REQUIREMENTS IN THE EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRY: A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD CONTINUED Policy documents such as the draft Reviewed Mining Charter (and the current Mining Charter) sets out local content requirements to achieve economic objectives may well be subject to challenge (through domestic court processes or international dispute resolution systems) for failing to comply with international investment and trade law obligations. The rationale behind the use of local content requirements by South Africa in the mining sector (similar to other resource rich countries) is motivated by the need to address the following developmental imperatives: to gradually reduce the over-reliance on natural resources with respect to their contributions to national income, foreign exchange, and exports; the paradox of plenty, that is, the unacceptably high prevalence of poverty and inequality amid an abundance of resource riches (Karl 1997); to mitigate and manage social and political risks due to rising expectations domestically for a better and more equitable distribution of wealth; and the need to create more job opportunities, given the capitalintensiveness of the extractive sector. As a sovereign state South Africa has the right to adopt any policy or regulatory framework which has the objective of achieving the developmental imperatives aforesaid. However, policy documents such as the draft Reviewed Mining Charter (and the current Mining Charter) sets out local content requirements to achieve economic objectives may well be subject to challenge (through domestic court processes or international dispute resolution systems) for failing to comply with international investment and trade law obligations. The existing international World Trade Organization trade rules on certain forms of local content requirements are very clear in either prohibiting, allowing or restricting the grounds for any form of quantitative restrictions. The draft Reviewed Mining Charter contemplates that 60% of all capital goods and 70% of all consumable goods required by holders of mining rights must be procured from BEE compliant local manufacturers of such goods. These restrictions may be inconsistent with South Africa s obligations in terms of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade of 1994 read with the Agreement on Trade-Related Measures which prohibit any trade-related measures inconsistent with Articles III (national treatment) or XI (quantitative restrictions) of GATT. In respect of quantitative restrictions Article III (4) of GATT specifically prohibits measures requiring the purchase or use by an enterprise of domestic products, whether specified in terms of particular products, in terms of volume or value of products, or in terms of a proportion of volume or value of its local production. In addition, it should be remembered that despite the termination of certain Bilateral Investment Agreements (BITs) most of those BITs contain sunset provisions for 15 or 20 years from date of termination. That implies that any adverse policy changes by government which affects the investment of a company holding a mining interest or right in South Africa, which investment pre-dates the 3 MINING AND MINERALS AND INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION ALERT 22 June 2016

LOCAL CONTENT REQUIREMENTS IN THE EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRY: A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD CONTINUED From a broad-based economic developmental perspective it is understandable that the South African government must ensure the meaningful economic participation for historically marginalised people in the mining industry. termination of any BIT, could potentially still be deemed as a breach of the relevant BIT. The Southern African Development Community Protocol on Finance and Investment also provides further recourse to international arbitration to existing investors who have a qualifying investment for any breach by South Africa of its obligations contemplated therein. There is accordingly a fine-line between a state s regulating what is deemed to be in the public interest and the rights foreign investor could enforce on the basis that the state breached, amongst others, the fair and equitable principle contemplated in BITs or multilateral investment agreements. From a broad-based economic developmental perspective it is understandable that the South African government must ensure the meaningful economic participation for historically marginalised people in the mining industry. In that regard the South African government must be unapologetic in putting policies and legal frameworks in place to ensure that this objective is achieved. However in doing so it must ensure that the policies and legal framework adopted do not expose it to legal challenge (domestic court challenges or international arbitration) due to inconsistency with international trade or investment law obligations. There are a number of other local content requirements imposed by government through national treasury and other government departments (Department of Trade and Industry and Department of Energy) which are open to challenge on the aforesaid basis or for the failure to follow a proper process in deriving at specific local content targets for local manufacturing (designated sectors for local content). The rationale for certain of these decisions or directives by national treasury or other government agencies may be questionable. A further Alert highlighting these issues will follow in a later edition. Jackwell Feris 2015 1 ST South African law firm and 12 th internationally for Africa & Middle East by deal value 2015-2016 2012-2016 2 ND South African law firm and 2 nd internationally for Africa & Middle East by deal count 1 ST South African law firm and 15 th internationally for Europe buyouts by deal value Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr BAND 2 Dispute Resolution Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr BAND 3 Energy & Natural Resources: Mining Ranked Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr TIER 2 FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION Ranked Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr TIER 2 FOR MINING 4 MINING AND MINERALS AND INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION ALERT 22 June 2016

OUR TEAM For more information about our Dispute Resolution practice and services, please contact: Tim Fletcher T +27 (0)11 562 1061 E tim.fletcher@cdhlegal.com Grant Ford Regional Practice Head T +27 (0)21 405 6111 E grant.ford@cdhlegal.com Adine Abro T +27 (0)11 562 1009 E adine.abro@cdhlegal.com Roy Barendse T +27 (0)21 405 6177 E roy.barendse@cdhlegal.com Eugene Bester T +27 (0)11 562 1173 E eugene.bester@cdhlegal.com Sonia de Vries T +27 (0)11 562 1892 E sonia.devries@cdhlegal.com Lionel Egypt T +27 (0)21 481 6400 E lionel.egypt@cdhlegal.com Jackwell Feris T +27 (0)11 562 1825 E jackwell.feris@cdhlegal.com Thabile Fuhrmann T +27 (0)11 562 1331 E thabile.fuhrmann@cdhlegal.com Anja Hofmeyr T +27 (0)11 562 1129 E anja.hofmeyr@cdhlegal.com Willem Janse van Rensburg T +27 (0)11 562 1110 E willem.jansevanrensburg@cdhlegal.com Julian Jones T +27 (0)11 562 1189 E julian.jones@cdhlegal.com Tobie Jordaan T +27 (0)11 562 1356 E tobie.jordaan@cdhlegal.com Corné Lewis T +27 (0)11 562 1042 E corne.lewis@cdhlegal.com Richard Marcus T +27 (0)21 481 6396 E richard.marcus@cdhlegal.com Burton Meyer T +27 (0)11 562 1056 E burton.meyer@cdhlegal.com Rishaban Moodley T +27 (0)11 562 1666 E rishaban.moodley@cdhlegal.com Byron O Connor T +27 (0)11 562 1140 E byron.oconnor@cdhlegal.com Lucinde Rhoodie T +27 (0)21 405 6080 E lucinde.rhoodie@cdhlegal.com Jonathan Ripley-Evans T +27 (0)11 562 1051 E jonathan.ripleyevans@cdhlegal.com Willie van Wyk T +27 (0)11 562 1057 E willie.vanwyk@cdhlegal.com Joe Whittle T +27 (0)11 562 1138 E joe.whittle@cdhlegal.com Jonathan Witts-Hewinson T +27 (0)11 562 1146 E witts@cdhlegal.com Pieter Conradie Executive Consultant T +27 (0)11 562 1071 E pieter.conradie@cdhlegal.com Nick Muller Executive Consultant T +27 (0)21 481 6385 E nick.muller@cdhlegal.com Marius Potgieter Executive Consultant T +27 (0)11 562 1142 E marius.potgieter@cdhlegal.com Nicole Amoretti Professional Support Lawyer T +27 (0)11 562 1420 E nicole.amoretti@cdhlegal.com BBBEE STATUS: LEVEL THREE CONTRIBUTOR Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr is very pleased to have achieved a Level 3 BBBEE verification under the new BBBEE Codes of Good Practice. Our BBBEE verification is one of several components of our transformation strategy and we continue to seek ways of improving it in a meaningful manner. This information is published for general information purposes and is not intended to constitute legal advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular situation. Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr will accept no responsibility for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this publication. JOHANNESBURG 1 Protea Place, Sandton, Johannesburg, 2196. Private Bag X40, Benmore, 2010, South Africa. Dx 154 Randburg and Dx 42 Johannesburg. T +27 (0)11 562 1000 F +27 (0)11 562 1111 E jhb@cdhlegal.com CAPE TOWN 11 Buitengracht Street, Cape Town, 8001. PO Box 695, Cape Town, 8000, South Africa. Dx 5 Cape Town. T +27 (0)21 481 6300 F +27 (0)21 481 6388 E ctn@cdhlegal.com 2016 1153/JUNE MINING AND MINERALS AND INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION cliffedekkerhofmeyr.com

OUR TEAM For more information about our Mining and Minerals sector and services, please contact: Allan Reid Sector Head T +27 (0)11 562 1222 E allan.reid@cdhlegal.com Giada Masina T +27 (0)11 562 1221 E giada.masina@cdhlegal.com Emil Brincker Tax and Exchange Control T +27 (0)11 562 1063 E emil.brincker@cdhlegal.com Willem Jacobs T +27 (0)11 562 1555 E willem.jacobs@cdhlegal.com Aadil Patel Employment T +27 (0)11 562 1107 E aadil.patel@cdhlegal.com Deon Wilken Finance and Banking T +27 (0)11 562 1096E E deon.wilken@cdhlegal.com Terry Winstanley Environmental T +27 (0)21 562 6332 E terry.winstanley@cdhlegal.com Julian Jones Sector Head Business Rescue and Insolvency T +27 (0)11 562 1198 E julian.jones@cdhlegal.com Mark Linington Private Equity Sector Head Tax and Exchange Control T +27 (0)11 562 1667 E mark.linington@cdhlegal.com Deepa Vallabh Head: Cross-border M&A, Africa and Asia T +27 (0)11 562 1188 E deepa.vallabh@cdhlegal.com Ian Burger T +27 (0)11 562 1177 E ian.burger@cdhlegal.com Jackwell Feris Dispute Resolution T +27 (0)11 562 1825 E jackwell.feris@cdhlegal.com Lilia Franca T +27 (0)11 562 1148 E lilia.franca@cdhlegal.com Sandra Gore Environmental T +27 (0)11 562 1433 E sandra.gore@cdhlegal.com Fiona Leppan Employment T +27 (0)11 562 1153 E fiona.leppan@cdhlegal.com Banzi Malinga T +27 (0)11 562 1100 E banzi.malinga@cdhlegal.com Rishaban Moodley Dispute Resolution T +27 (0)11 562 1666 E rishaban.moodley@cdhlegal.com Nonhla Mchunu T +27 (0)11 562 1228 E nonhla.mchunu@cdhlegal.com Verushca Pillay T +27 (0)11 562 1800 E verushca.pillay@cdhlegal.com Sibongile Solombela T +27 (0)11 562 1534 E sibongile.solombela@cdhlegal.com Luntu Sebatane T +27 (0)11 562 1087 E luntu.sebatane@cdhlegal.com BBBEE STATUS: LEVEL THREE CONTRIBUTOR Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr is very pleased to have achieved a Level 3 BBBEE verification under the new BBBEE Codes of Good Practice. Our BBBEE verification is one of several components of our transformation strategy and we continue to seek ways of improving it in a meaningful manner. This information is published for general information purposes and is not intended to constitute legal advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular situation. Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr will accept no responsibility for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this publication. JOHANNESBURG 1 Protea Place, Sandton, Johannesburg, 2196. Private Bag X40, Benmore, 2010, South Africa. Dx 154 Randburg and Dx 42 Johannesburg. T +27 (0)11 562 1000 F +27 (0)11 562 1111 E jhb@cdhlegal.com CAPE TOWN 11 Buitengracht Street, Cape Town, 8001. PO Box 695, Cape Town, 8000, South Africa. Dx 5 Cape Town. T +27 (0)21 481 6300 F +27 (0)21 481 6388 E ctn@cdhlegal.com 2016 1153/JUNE MINING AND MINERALS AND INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION cliffedekkerhofmeyr.com