Additional copies of this report are available by calling the Workers Compensation Division at (651) or

Similar documents
COLLECTION AND ASSESSMENT OF FINES AND PENALTIES

Additional copies of this report are available by calling the Workers Compensation Division at (651) or toll-free at

Additional copies of this report are available by calling the Workers Compensation Division at (651) or toll-free at

2003 Collection and Assessment of Fines and Penalties

Minnesota Workers Compensation System Report, 1999

Workers compensation settlements

Labor/Business Workers Compensation Agreement ( ) 3. Change the data collected on the prevailing charge from the current one year to two years.

Age discrimination. Know your rights under Minnesota laws prohibiting age discrimination. refuse to hire or employ a person on the basis of age;

System Report, Minnesota Workers' Compensation. labor & industry. minnesota department of. Policy Development, Research and Statistics

Proposed Amendments to Rules Governing Workers Compensation Vocational Rehabilitation Fees, Minnesota Rules, Part , R

System Report, Minnesota Workers' Compensation. labor & industry. minnesota department of. Policy Development, Research and Statistics

Minnesota Workers' Compensation System Report, 2016

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BUREAU OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CHAPTER CLAIMS HANDLING STANDARDS

EMPLOYER S GUIDE TO THE MASSACHUSETTS WORKERS COMPENSATION SYSTEM

What is workers compensation?

HOLDING EMPLOYERS AND EMPLOYEES ACCOUNTABLE. In the State of New York, there is a long settled rule that employees are hired at will unless

Minnesota Workers Compensation DRG Evaluation Report

HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 12 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SUBTITLE 3 DISABILITY COMPENSATION DIVISION CHAPTER 10

OVERVIEW OF WISCONSIN WORKER S COMPENSATION SYSTEM

Minnesota Workers Compensation System Report, 2002

Tennessee Workers Compensation Data Calendar Years A Report of Statewide Data for the Tennessee Workers Compensation Advisory Council

Workers Compensation Claim State Environmental Guide - Massachusetts

Bulletin. Periodic Data Matching for Medical Assistance and MinnesotaCare TOPIC PURPOSE CONTACT SIGNED TERMINOLOGY NOTICE NUMBER DATE OF INTEREST TO

State Education Funding Accounting Shifts

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD

Priority qualified facility spending- Closed Landfill Investment Fund

COBRA Administration procedures for

2017 Minnesota Session Laws: Summary of Workers' Compensation Advisory Council legislation By Kate Berger, Office of General Counsel

Return-to-Work Assistance

INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA

CORRECTIONAL PLAN HANDBOOK

BEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ON REFERRAL BY THE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE

A practical guide from the Artell Law Group team. Basics

DETERMINATION OF MEDICARE ISSUES IN WORKERS COMPENSATION CASES 2008

Comparative Review of Workers Compensation Systems in Select Jurisdictions

Illinois Municipal League 97 th Annual Conference

Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance in the Minnesota Long-Term Care Industry:

Chapter WAC EMPLOYMENT SECURITY RULE GOVERNANCE

2015 Changes to Wisconsin Worker s Compensation Act 2015 CHANGES TO WISCONSIN WORKERS COMPENSATION ACT

CEA PROCEDURES FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIMS. The following is a step-by-step procedure for handling workers compensation claims.

POLICY TRANSMITTAL NO November 9, 2011 OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY

GROUP BENEFIT PLAN STATE OF MINNESOTA

Minnesota Workers Compensation System Report, 2003

Revenue Gain or (Loss) F.Y F.Y F.Y F.Y (000 s) General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0

Modernization program close to selecting technology vendor. Mileage rate increases

Senate Bill No. 63 Committee on Commerce, Labor and Energy

1 Exam Prep Business Procedures Worker s Compensation Practice Test

SB (b)(8) & (9) January 1, 2013 Minimum weekly benefit increased from $130 to $160 for injuries on/after January 1, 2013

FOR THE COMMON GOOD: 222 RECOMMENDATIONS ROYAL COMMISSION REPORTS ON WORKERS COMPENSATION SYSTEM

BEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ON REFERRAL FROM THE ALASKA COMMISSION ON POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION

DECISION AFTER FAIR HEARING JURISDICTION ISSUE FINDINGS OF FACT. In the Matter of the Appeal of

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 613

State Education Funding Accounting Shifts

IC Chapter 34. Limited Service Health Maintenance Organizations

GROUP BENEFIT PLAN STATE OF MINNESOTA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

T H E L A W O F F I C E O F R I C K Y D. G R E E N, P L L C

AB 501 (Spiros) compared to WC council bill Prepared by: J.Buchen 12/2/2015

The Workers Advisers Office (WAO)

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS LIABILITY COVERAGE

What PERA Employers need to know

World Bank Group Directive

Senate Substitute for HOUSE BILL No. 2026

Table of Contents Board on Judicial Standards. Agency Profile...1 Expenditures Overview (REVISED)...3 Financing by Fund (REVISED)...

Objectives. Agenda. What to expect from an OSHA inspection: 8/22/2017. Tips for Producers

Annual Report on Cost Containment. Fiscal Year 2017

ANNUAL REPORT Fiscal Year Minnesota Crime Victims Reparations Board

Workers Compensation Program

MARCH 5, Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. SUMMARY Revises provisions governing workers compensation.

Health Care Renewal Notice

Disability. Short-Term Disability benefits. Long-Term Disability benefits

Table of Contents Board on Judicial Standards

Employment Law Update

Setoff Debt Collection Program

STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR NON-ADVERTISED BID PROJECTS

South Dakota Workers Compensation System

Advocate Health Care Network Disability Income Protection Summary of Benefits

STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR ADVERTISED BID PROJECTS

IRONWORKERS WORKERS' COMPENSATION ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION SYSTEM

Women s Economic Security Act

BEFORE THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO

REPRESENTING ALEX SINK CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER STATE OF FLORIDA

Risk Alert Navy FCU Consent Order

GOVERNOR S PROGRAM BILL MEMORANDUM

No. 105,787 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. LEO NILGES, Appellant, STATE OF KANSAS and STATE SELF INSURANCE FUND, Appellees.

Subd. 5. "Health and Inspections Department" means the City of St. Cloud Health and

Directive. Staff Rule 6.11, Workers' Compensation. Bank Access to Information Policy Designation Public. Catalogue Number. Issued

The Legislature established the Minnesota Department of Human Rights

Workers Compensation Insurance

GROUP INSURANCE CERTIFICATE RIDER

Notice of Rulemaking Hearing

Morris, Jimmy v. Spec Personnel, LLC

Workplace Safety and Loss Prevention Incentive Program (Safety, Drug and Alcohol Prevention, and Return to Work Incentive Programs)

ABPS APPEALS POLICY A. CATEGORIES OF COMPLAINTS 1. PREREQUISITE / REQUISITE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS

Member Handbook. Your PERA Coordinated Plan Benefits. Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota

Has the Agency acted correctly with respect to its determination to discontinue the Appellant's Public Assistance benefits?

Labor Law Regulation Part 60 Pursuant to Section 134 of the Workers. Compensation Law as amended by Chapter 6 of the Laws of 2007

New York State WC Reform Update

Craneridge Association Violation Policy

OF FLORIDA. A Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Appellate Division, Kevin Emas, Diane Ward, Israel Reyes, Judges.

Transcription:

Workers Compensation Division Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry 443 Lafayette Road N. St. Paul, MN 55155 January 2017 The total estimated cost of publishing this report is $500. Additional copies of this report are available by calling the Workers Compensation Division at (651) 284-5030 or 1-800-342-5354. Information in this report can be obtained in alternative formats by calling the department at (651) 284-5030 or 1-800-342-5354. Visit the department s website at www.dli.mn.gov.

Contents Introduction...1 Penalty procedure and allocation...1 Observations...2 Conclusion...3 Appendix table, penalty statistics...4

Introduction Minnesota Statutes 176.222 directs the commissioner of the Department of Labor and Industry (DLI) to submit an annual report to the Legislature about the assessment and collection of fines and penalties under the workers compensation law. Fines and penalties are found throughout the workers compensation statutes and are directed at the following entities for the below-mentioned reasons. Employers, for: o failure to obtain workers compensation insurance; o failure to post required posters; o late filing of First Report of Injury forms; or o falsifying insurance information. Self-insured employers, insurance companies and third-party administrators, for: o failure to pay benefits to an injured employee or file a timely denial of liability; o failure to pay benefits when ordered to do so by the commissioner or a compensation judge; o failure to file required reports; o denying benefits without notice or reason; o failure to respond within 30 days to the department s request for information; o failure to pay pursuant to an order within 45 days; or o late filing or payment of assessments. Vocational rehabilitation providers, for: o failure to follow the rehabilitation rules. Certified managed care plans and health care providers, for: o failure to provide services as required by statute or rule, or in accordance with the managed care plan as certified. Any party to a claim, for: o failure to release requested existing medical data in a timely fashion. Under the workers compensation law, penalties are paid either to the Assigned Risk Safety Account or directly to injured employees. This report illustrates a comparative analysis for statefiscal-years 2013 through 2016, which begin July 1 and end June 30. Penalty procedure and allocation When a potential penalty situation is identified, a penalty notice is sent describing the infraction and the penalty to be paid. An objection to the penalty must be filed in writing within 30 days, except for penalties for failure to obtain workers compensation insurance, which must be filed within 10 days. Upon timely objection to a penalty, attempts are made to reach a negotiated settlement. If a settlement cannot be obtained, the matter is brought forth to the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) and can be appealed to the Minnesota Workers Compensation Court of Appeals and the Minnesota Supreme Court. In certain cases, appeals are heard by the

Rehabilitation Review Panel (Minnesota Statutes 176.102) or the Medical Services Review Board (Minnesota Statutes 176.103) prior to being heard by the Minnesota Workers Compensation Court of Appeals and the Minnesota Supreme Court. Observations Failure to insure DLI s Special Compensation Fund (SCF) unit assesses penalties against employers doing business in Minnesota when the employer does not have workers compensation insurance coverage in effect for its employees. Mandatory coverage or failure to insure penalties have a wide range of unknown factors when a penalty is assessed. The initial penalty is based upon an estimated evaded premium (EEP). To determine the EEP, DLI must make assumptions regarding the type of business and payroll. These assumptions are based on information submitted to DLI by the employer. Upon notification of a penalty, the employer may furnish DLI with additional information to calculate a true evaded premium, which is then used to determine the actual penalty. Therefore, the initial penalty is a starting point and the final penalty is the DLI intends to collect. The disparity between the final penalty and the collected is the result of challenges throughout the collection process, including employer bankruptcy, lack of assets, the department s inability to locate the employer or other factors beyond DLI s control. DLI has continued to explore methods to find employers that have never obtained or fail to maintain workers compensation coverage. During the past year, DLI has contacted hundreds of new employers to provide them with information regarding their potential obligation to carry workers compensation insurance, to assist them with a better understanding of their obligation and to promote compliance with workers compensation laws. In response to employers requests, DLI is also updating its communications to make them more understandable to employers. Late filing of special fund assessment penalties These penalties continue to be issued. The volume and of penalties have stabilized from 2014 to 2015. Claim-related penalties In fiscal-year 2013, the number of prohibited practices penalties increased due to several insurance companies, self-insured employers or third-party administrators incurring multiple penalties for failing to respond to DLI requests or late payments of awards or orders. The number of prohibited practices penalties assessed returned to baseline in fiscal-years 2014 and 2015, due to increased compliance with responding to DLI requests. Warnings are not tracked as part of this report, so though DLI issued fewer prohibited practices penalties overall in fiscal-year 2016, there were a higher number of penalties with a dollar assessed, accounting for the slight increase. The increase in late filing of first report of injury penalties in fiscal-years 2014 through 2016 is partially due to reporters adjusting to the Jan. 1, 2014, requirement that first reports of injury be

filed electronically. Many reporters automatically trigger their system to send first reports of injury when certain criteria are met; thus, DLI is receiving first reports of injury that may not have been filed in the past, increasing both the number of filings and the number of penalties assessed. Late first payment penalties have remained consistent since fiscal-year 2013, with a temporary spike in fiscal-year 2014, most likely due to reporters becoming acclimated to electronic filing of first report of injury data. The number of penalties for late denial has spiked since fiscal-year 2013, most likely due to an increased number of claim denials overall, following precedentsetting case law addressing the causation standard. Other penalties consist of various penalties for late payments of indemnity benefits, awards or orders, failing to file required forms, etc. Since fiscal-year 2013, a high percentage of other penalties assessed has been due to insurers not filing a required form when requested by DLI. In fiscal-year 2015, most were assessed for the insurer s failure to file a Disability Status Report form or a Notice of Intention to Discontinue Benefits form after the employee had not returned to work within a certain period of time. Fiscal-year 2016 showed a rather dramatic drop in the number of other penalties assessed due to better compliance with requests to file forms. Rehabilitation provider discipline increased in fiscal-years 2014 and 2015 due to the processing in fiscal-year 2014 of a backlog of approximately 100 complaints. The number of complaints submitted and processed has since returned to baseline, correlating to a return to baseline of the number or rehabilitation provider penalties assessed and collected in fiscal-year 2016. Conclusion The number of failure-to-insure penalties issued and the penalty collected have stabilized as greater emphasis has been placed on partnering with other state, county and city agencies to ensure workers compensation insurance is in place at the time those agencies issue licenses to employers. Continuing efforts to reach all new business owners to inform them of their responsibility to obtain workers compensation insurance appear to have been successful. Claim-related penalties have remained relatively stable. Penalties issued for late filing of the first report of injury increased in fiscal-years 2014 through 2016, likely due to increased filings from system auto-triggers related to mandatory electronic reporting. Although the overall number of prohibited practice penalties issued has decreased, the number of penalties with a dollar assessed increased in fiscal-year 2016. Other penalties decreased in fiscal-year 2016, due to increased compliance with requests to file forms. Precedent-setting case law addressing the causation standard in workers compensation has led to an increase in denials of workers compensation claims, correlating with an increase in the number of penalties assessed for late denials in fiscal-year 2016.

Penalty type Late filing of 1st report (M.S. 176.231) Late 1st payment (M.S. 176.221 & 176.225) Late denial (M.S. 176.221) Prohibited practices (M.S. 176.194) Rehabilitation provider discipline (M.S. 176.102) Managed care organization discipline (M.S. 176.1351) Health care provider discipline (M.S. 176.103) Failure to insure (M.S. 176.181) Late filing of special fund assessment (M.S. 176.129 & 176.130) Other penalties (M.S. 176.221, 176.225, 176.138, 176.231, 176.238, & 176.84) Appendix table Workers' Compensation Division penalty statistics FY 2013 Assessed Collected 617 $265,750 467 $202,900 862 $377,375 768 $333,605 888 $403,500 899 $346,275 879 $403,250 910 $358,775 757 $314,491 688 $262,637 806 $340,898 829 $328,187 747 $313,739 771 $295,914 760 $341,253 780 $328,433 $114,260 $126,967 $117,055 $119,582 194 $93,250 167 $76,250 175 $87,500 165 $82,125 171 $102,500 180 $80,775 203 $134,500 208 $90,925 60 $246,000 40 $162,086 37 $129,000 40 $141,500 34 $114,000 41 $106,785 47 $180,000 38 $118,400 1 $1,000 1 $1,000 3 $2,250 3 $2,250 6 $3,625 8 $5,075 2 $900 1 $450 1 $1,500 0 $0 1 $25,000 1 $25,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $2,017,591 $1,264,339 $1,848,265 $935,393 $1,988,272 $912,089 396 $1,981,988 $862,097 572 791 463 558 375 442 $1,554,745 $1,514,061 $1,537,270 $1,545,527 443 8 $10,578 6 $9,650 35 $66,271 20 $46,297 33 $67,199 28 $42,671 15 $22,772 20 $29,530 $168,271 $111,060 $157,805 $134,723 $148,359 485 332 417 Assessed FY 2014 383 Collected 509 $111,534 339 $101,133 $180,540 $139,918 $216,044 $152,616 FY 2016 Assessed Collected Totals 2,695 $2,950,385 2,492 $2,089,923 2,799 $2,967,045 2,767 $2,029,079 2,724 $3,023,291 2,878 $1,901,117 2,641 $3,001,533 2,717 $1,873,748 470 FY 2015 Assessed Collected 317 $85,137 The differences between the penalties assessed and collected is a result of: rescinded and settled penalties, timing delays, and data for penalties paid to employees not being collected by the department. The assessed penalty s for late 1st payment and other penalties show the payable to the department first and the payable to the employee second. The Failure to Insure Assessed Penalty Amounts show the initial estimated penalty s over the more precise final penalty s.