Charles A. Sweet, Managing Director/Practice Development Leader, Structured Transactions, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Washington, D.C.

Similar documents
Credit Risk Retention: Dodd- Frank Final Rule February 26, 2015 Presented By: Kenneth E. Kohler Jerry R. Marlatt

REQUIREMENTS AND HIGHLIGHTS OF THE VOLCKER RULE AND ITS REGULATIONS

Defining Issues. Regulators Finalize Risk- Retention Rule for ABS. November 2014, No Key Facts. Key Impacts

A Guide to the Re-Proposed Credit Risk Retention Rules for Securitizations

Covenant-Lite Loans: Recent Trends for U.S. Middle Markets and European Markets

Final Credit Risk Retention Rule. Last Updated: December 2014

Structured Finance Alert

Credit Risk Retention

SECTION 4062(e) PLANT SHUTDOWN LIABILITY

MMI Legal & Compliance Webinar: The Volcker Rule and the Final Regulations. January 15, Charles M. Horn Julie A. Marcacci

Regulation AB II September 19, 2014 Presented By: Kenneth E. Kohler Jerry R. Marlatt

Understanding the Requirements and Impact of the Volcker Rule and the Final Regulations. February 11, 2014

Bank Affiliate Transactions Under Scrutiny Complying With Regulation W's Complex Restrictions on Business Dealings with Affiliate Institutions

DEBT FINANCING FOR EARLY STAGE VENTURES

Structuring Commercial Loan Documents to Protect Non-Affiliated Lenders

Affordable Care Act Tasks:

Back to the Drawing Board: Regulatory Agencies Re-Propose Risk-Retention Rules for Securitizations

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Financing Multi-Family Housing: Structuring the Low Income House Tax Credit and Tax-Exempt Bonds Documenting Transactions for Investors and Developers

Completion Guaranties in Construction Lending: Key Provisions for Lenders and Guarantors

2016 PLAN SPONSOR BASICS 401(k) ISSUES. Presenters: Lisa Barton and Elizabeth Kennedy November 9, 2016

Opinion Letters in Commercial Real Estate Best Practices to Minimize Risk When Crafting Third Party Opinions on Loans and Acquisitions

UNDERSTANDING CLOSED- END INTERVAL FUNDS Sean Graber, Partner Thomas S. Harman, Partner David W. Freese, Associate. June 7, 2017

Best Efforts and Commercially Reasonable Efforts in M&A Agreements: Drafting and Interpretation Challenges

Mergers, Acquisitions, and Other

By William P. Cejudo, Charles A. Sweet, James A. Gouwar and John Arnholz. Volume 10 Issue JOURNAL OF TAXATION OF FINANCIAL PRODUCTS 29

M&A ACADEMY CHOOSING AN ACQUISITION STRUCTURE AND STRUCTURING A DEAL

ABS Shelf Eligibility Criteria

REGULATORY BRIEFING BOOK

Structuring Commercial Loan Term Sheets, Proposals and Commitment Letters: Key Terms for Lenders and Borrowers

TAX ISSUES IN M&A TRANSACTIONS

Real Estate Transactions With REITs: Selling, Leasing or Lending to a REIT

Part-Timers and Locations and Turnover Oh My! An Overview of Employee Benefits Issues for Retail Organizations

Biography. Mary B. Hevener Washington, D.C. T F

PLAN TERMINATION ISSUES

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

A Guide to the SEC s Proposed Revisions to the Rules and Forms for Offerings of Asset-Backed Securities

Mezzanine Lending: Overcoming Lender Risks to Protect ROI

PLAN SPONSOR BASICS: RETIREMENT PLAN. Presenters: Lisa H. Barton and Mark J. Simons September 22, 2015

Structuring Preferred Equity Investments in Real Estate Ventures: Impact of True Equity vs. "Debt-Like" Equity

IMPLEMENTING THE BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP RULES. April 18, 2018 Charles Horn, Melissa Hall, Ignacio Sandoval

IP ISSUES IN MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Mortgage Foreclosure Responding to Attorneys General Investigations and Minimizing Liability Risk

Bad Actor Disqualification in Private Placements New Rule 506(d)

M&A ACADEMY: TAX ISSUES IN M&A TRANSACTIONS

by Lisa Filomia-Aktas, EY

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Brian E. Hammell, Esq., Sullivan & Worcester, Boston

This chapter was originally published in:

UCC Article 9 Blanket Asset Lien Exclusions and Purchase Money Security Interests

PREPARING FOR A CHANGE IN CONTROL

Fiduciary Issues for Retirement

Distressed Loan Workouts: How Equity Cure Rights Work, Negotiating Loan Restructuring and Forbearance Agreements

CONSUMER-DRIVEN HEALTHCARE POST-ACA. Presenters: Andy Anderson and Sage Fattahian March 30, 2016

SEC Adopts Final Rules Related to Representation and Warranties in Asset-Backed Securities Offerings

The Volcker Rule: Impact of the Final Rule on Securitization Investors and Sponsors

Landscape for U.S. Asset-Backed Securities

Preparing For and Managing g Plan Audits

M&A ACADEMY PURCHASE PRICE ADJUSTMENTS & EARN- OUTS

Structuring Waterfall Provisions in LLC and Partnership Agreements Navigating Complex Distribution Structures, Minimizing Negative Tax Consequences

Allocating Operating Expenses in Commercial Real Estate Leases: Negotiating Strategies for Landlords and Tenants

Real Estate Joint Ventures: Opportunities and Legal Risks Strategies to Negotiate and Structure the JV Operating Agreement

M&A ACADEMY: THIRD PARTY REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES INSURANCE IN STRATEGIC AND PE DEALS

Structuring Credit Facilities for Private Equity Funds: Subscription, NAV and Hybrid Loans

February 2015

Structuring Leveraged Loans After Tax Reform: Concerns for Multinational Entities

Bank Affiliate Transactions: Navigating Regulation W, Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act

M&A ACADEMY EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN ISSUES IN M&A TRANSACTIONS. Presenters: Colby Smith and David Zelikoff February 14, 2017

Data Breaches in ERISA Benefit Plans: Prevention and Response

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Defining Issues. SEC Adopts Regulation AB II. September 2014, No Key Facts. Key Impact

The Future of Housing Finance, the Mortgage Market and Securitization

U.S. CREDIT RISK RETENTION RULES:

A GUIDE TO REGULATION AB II. September 10, 2014

Structuring Waterfall Provisions in LLC and Partnership Agreements Navigating Complex Distribution Structures, Minimizing Negative Tax Consequences

Private Investment Funds and Tax Reform

PRIVACY AND CYBERSECURITY ISSUES IN M&A TRANSACTIONS

Anatomy of a Deferred Compensation Plan

Tax Strategies for Real Estate LLC and LP Agreements: Capital Commitments, Tax Allocations, Distributions, and More

SEC PROPOSES LIQUIDITY RISK- MANAGEMENT RULES. Christopher D. Menconi, Sean Graber, Beau Yanoshik, David W. Freese January 20, 2016

THE TRANSFORMATION OF INVESTMENT ADVICE: DIGITAL ADVISERS AS FIDUCIARIES

ERISA Pre-Approved and Customized Benefit Plans: Overhauled IRS Procedures and Determination Letter Process

401(k) Plan Issues Presenters: April 16, 2013

Structuring Incremental Loan Facilities: Key Terms, Most Favored Nation Provisions and Incremental Equivalent Agreements

Anatomy of an Equity Compensation Plan

M&A ACADEMY CHOOSING AN ACQUISITION STRUCTURE AND STRUCTURING A DEAL

The Proposed Rule also imposes further. clarifies that, when acting as conservator or receiver, the FDIC would consent

A Guide to Regulation AB II

Structuring Equity Compensation for Partnerships and LLCs Navigating Capital and Profits Interests Plus Section 409A and Tax Consequences

Federal Agencies Revise Proposed Securitization Risk Retention Rules

Implications of Final Volcker Rule

Using Partnership Flips to Finance Renewable Energy Projects: Evaluating Tax Risks, Navigating IRS Safe Harbors

Acquiring Real Estate From a Bankrupt Seller: Legal Issues Evaluating Acquisition Options and Navigating Complex Bankruptcy Court Procedures

UCC Article 9 Update on Searching and Filing: Best Practices for Secured Lenders Under the Amended Rules

Property Management and Leasing Agreements: Key Provisions for Multi-Family, Office, Retail and Industrial Properties

BENEFITS AND COMPENSATION: MISSION CRITICAL FOR TECH COMPANY SUCCESS

UCC Article 9 Update: Searching and Filing Under New Amendments

Solar Securitization: The Emergence of a New Funding Structure

The Next Compliance Hurdle under Regulation AB II: Annual Compliance Checks to Determine Continued Shelf Eligibility

Transcription:

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Asset Securitization: Impact of Regulation AB II, the Credit Risk Retention Rules and the Volcker Rule Navigating the Complexities of Federal Laws and Rules Governing the Offer and Sale of Asset-Backed Securities TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2014 1pm Eastern 12pm Central 11am Mountain 10am Pacific Today s faculty features: Reed D. Auerbach, Partner, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, New York Daniel Budofsky, Partner, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, New York Charles A. Sweet, Managing Director/Practice Development Leader, Structured Transactions, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Washington, D.C. The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.

Tips for Optimal Quality FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY Sound Quality If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection. If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial 1-866-370-2805 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail sound@straffordpub.com immediately so we can address the problem. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. Viewing Quality To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again.

Continuing Education Credits FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY For CLE purposes, please let us know how many people are listening at your location by completing each of the following steps: In the chat box, type (1) your company name and (2) the number of attendees at your location Click the word balloon button to send

ASSET SECURITIZATION: The Impact of Regulation AB II, The Credit Risk Retention Rules, and The Volcker Rule November 25, 2014 www.morganlewis.com

State of the ABS/RMBS Markets The combined ABS and MBS markets hit a high before the credit crisis, with total issuance of $2.708 trillion After the credit crisis, ABS issuance dropped precipitously, but private-label RMBS issuance fell off a cliff Between 2007 and 2010, ABS issuance declined 63 percent, from $289 billion to $106.5 billion From 2007 to 2008, private label RMBS issuance declined 98 percent, from $507 billion to under $9 billion, and in 2009 private label RMBS issuance was $0 Agency MBS and CMO issuance took up the slack, increasing 38 percent, from $1.466 trillion in 2007 to $2.029 trillion in 2009 5

State of the ABS/RMBS Markets (cont.) ABS began a strong recovery in 2011, with issuance of $124 billion. Recovery continues today, with ABS issuance for the first three quarters of 2014 already equal to $179 billion Private label RMBS issuance began a weak recovery in 2010 with issuance of $1.1 billion, increasing to $16.8 billion in 2013 The overall RMBS market is still heavily weighted towards agency issuance, with agency MBS/CMO issuance totaling $1.858 trillion in 2013 6

Regulation AB II: What are the asset-level data requirements? Asset-level data requirements apply only to: Residential mortgages Commercial mortgages Automobile loans and leases Debt securities Resecuritizations Each asset class has specific requirements 270 data points for RMBS Resecuritizations require asset-level data for underlying securities if they are in one of the covered asset classes Privacy concerns and implications 7

Regulation AB II: How will the registration process change? Forms SF-1 and SF-3 New shelf eligibility requirements CEO certification Familiar with pool assets, structure of the securitization, and material transaction documents No material misstatements or omissions Fairly presents in all material respects the characteristics of the securitized assets and the risks of ownership of the offered ABS, including risks that would affect the cash flows Reasonable basis to conclude that the securitization is structured (but not guaranteed) to produce expected cash flows to service scheduled payments of interest and the ultimate repayment of principal 8

Regulation AB II: How will the registration process change? (cont.) New shelf eligibility requirements (cont.) Asset representations manager Two-pronged trigger (delinquency + vote) After trigger, must review all assets 60+ days delinquent Dispute resolution Arbitration or mediation, requesting party chooses Investor communications Investor requests included in Form 10-D Annual compliance check May lose shelf access for up to a year 9

Regulation AB II: How will the registration process change? (cont.) New filing and delivery requirements Preliminary prospectus must be filed three business days before pricing If any material changes, must file prospectus supplement at least 48 hours before pricing Preliminary prospectus must be delivered 48 hours before delivery of confirmation Final transaction documents must be filed by filing deadline for final prospectus Integrated prospectus Single asset class/single depositor Pay-as-you-go 10

Regulation AB II: Are any other new disclosures required? Static pool information Narrative description of the information, methodology, differences from pool For amortizing asset pools, delinquencies and losses presented in 30-31 day increments through no less than 120 days Graphical presentation of delinquency, loss and prepayment data Transaction parties If the sponsor or 20 percent originator is required to repurchase or replace any asset for breach of a representation or warranty, financial disclosures are generally required Less than 10 percent originators identified if assets originated by nonaffiliates are 10 percent or more of the pool 11

Regulation AB II: Are any other new disclosures required? (cont.) Risk retention Nature and amount of the risk retained Amount and nature of any interest retained to comply with legal requirements (e.g., credit risk retention rules) Hedge that is materially related to the credit risk of the securities and was entered into to offset retained risk Document provisions governing asset modifications, effect on cash flows Enhanced prospectus summary 12

Regulation AB II: What did we avoid, and how long do we have? What was not adopted: Required disclosure in Rule 144A offerings Filing transaction documents by preliminary prospectus deadline Cash flow waterfall program Compliance dates and transition procedures Published: September 24, 2014 Effective: November 24, 2014 Compliance date (other than asset-level data): November 23, 2015 Compliance date (asset-level data): November 23, 2016 13

Credit Risk Retention: Who must retain credit risk? Rules generally impose risk retention requirements on sponsor Any person who organizes and initiates an asset-backed securities transaction by selling or transferring assets, either directly or indirectly, including through an affiliate, to the issuer If there is more than one sponsor, each sponsor is responsible for ensuring that at least one retains the entire required credit risk 14

Credit Risk Retention: Who must retain credit risk? (cont.) Risk retention generally may be held by majority-owned affiliate Entity other than the issuer that directly or indirectly majority controls, is majority controlled by, or is under common majority control with, sponsor Majority control means ownership of more than 50 percent of equity or any other controlling financial interest under GAAP 15

Credit Risk Retention: Who must retain credit risk? (cont.) Under standard risk retention option, sponsor may allocate risk retention obligations to one or more originators Only the original creditor Must have contributed at least 20 percent of the assets to the asset pool and hold at least 20 percent of risk retention (but no more than the percentage of the pool assets it originated) Acquired in same manner and proportion as originally by sponsor, for cash or reduction in asset purchase price Sponsor remains responsible for compliance For CLOs, the agencies view the CLO manager as the sponsor, even though it does not transfer assets into the issuing entity 16

Credit Risk Retention: What is the base requirement? Rules apply to securitizers in issuances of Exchange Act ABS Much broader than Reg. AB definition Does not include synthetics Securitizer generally must retain an economic interest equal to at least 5 percent of the aggregate credit risk of the pool assets All asset classes may use standard risk retention option (vertical, horizontal or combined) 17

Credit Risk Retention: What is the vertical option? Sponsor retains (or causes majority-owned affiliate to retain) at least 5 percent of each class of ABS interests issued as part of the securitization transaction Or an equivalent single vertical security ABS interest includes most types of interests issued by an issuing entity, whether or not certificated, if payments primarily depend on the cash flows from the collateral Excluding non-economic REMIC residual interest, and uncertificated regular REMIC interest held by another REMIC where both REMICs are part of the same structure and a single REMIC issues investor ABS interests Fair value calculations are not required 18

Credit Risk Retention: What is the horizontal option? Sponsor retains (or causes majority-owned affiliate to retain) an eligible horizontal residual interest equal to at least 5 percent of the fair value of all ABS interests issued Fair value is calculated under GAAP as of the closing date Required pre- and post-closing disclosures of fair values and valuation methodologies Eligible horizontal residual interest is one or more ABS interests that: Require P&I shortfalls to reduce amounts payable to the horizontal interest before reducing amounts payable to any other ABS interest Have the most subordinated claim to P&I No cash flow restrictions in final rules 19

Credit Risk Retention: What is the combined option? May fund horizontal cash reserve account in lieu of eligible horizontal residual interest Amount equal to required fair value of eligible horizontal residual interest Invested only in cash and cash equivalents Amounts used only to satisfy payments on ABS interests if there are insufficient funds, or to pay critical trust expenses Sponsor (or majority-owned affiliate to retain) may retain any combination of eligible vertical and horizontal interests, as long as the total percentages add up to at least 5 percent No representative sample option 20

Credit Risk Retention: What other methods are available? Commercial mortgage-backed securities Retention by up to two third-party B-piece buyers of a residual B- piece equal to at least 5 percent of the fair value of all ABS interests issued by the issuing entity Revolving pool securitizations Retention by the sponsor of a seller s interest equal to at least 5 percent of the total principal balance of the pool assets that shares the same risks as investors on a proportionate basis, or by combining a seller s interest with certain other forms of retention Asset-backed commercial paper conduits: Retention by each originator-seller of a residual interest equal to at least 5 percent of the fair value of all ABS interests backed by receivables of that originator-seller and certain of its affiliates 21

Credit Risk Retention: What other methods are available? (cont.) Securities guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Guarantee provided by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac will satisfy the risk retention requirement Open market collateralized loan obligations Retention of at least 5 percent of the face amount of each eligible loan tranche by the lead arranger of that loan Tender option bonds Retention by the sponsor of an eligible horizontal interest that meets the requirements of an eligible vertical interest upon a tender option termination event, retention by the sponsor of at least 5 percent of the face value of the deposited munis 22

Credit Risk Retention: What is the QRM exemption? Qualified residential mortgages (QRMs) are exempt, if: Pool consists solely of QRMs Every loan in the pool currently is fewer than 30 days past due Depositor certifies as to effectiveness of controls for ensuring that all assets are QRMs A QRM is a qualified mortgage (QM), as defined by the CFPB from time to time in ability to repay rules For a loan to be a QM, generally: It must fully amortize over its term, which cannot exceed 30 years Underwriting takes into account all mortgage-related obligations, is based on the maximum rate during the first five years and is on a fully amortized basis 23

Credit Risk Retention: What is the QRM exemption? (cont.) For a loan to be a QM, generally (cont.): Lender must verify current or reasonably expected income or assets and current debt obligations Borrower must have a total (or back-end, i.e., reflecting all debts, not just housing-related debts) DTI ratio of no more than 43 percent (based on the highest payment in first five years) No points or fees in excess of 3 percent (other than bona fide discount points on prime loans) No LTV or down payment requirement Also includes other special QM definitions as defined by applicable regulators If any non-qrm makes it into the pool, exemption will not be lost if sponsor repurchases within 90 days of discovery and notifies investors 24

Credit Risk Retention: Are other qualified assets exempt? Other qualified assets include qualified commercial loans, qualified commercial real estate loans and qualified consumer auto loans Commercial loan exemption will not help CLOs Auto loan exemption does not cover leases, requires DTI ratio of no more than 36 percent and does not recognize credit scoring A pool consisting solely of qualified assets is exempt These assets also qualify for blended pool treatment Qualified assets have a zero percent risk retention requirement, down to a minimum pool risk retention of 2.5 percent If non-qualified asset makes it into the pool, exemption will not be lost if sponsor repurchases or cures within 90 days of discovery and notifies investors 25

Credit Risk Retention: What other exemptions are there? Laundry list of securitization types with governmental guarantees or other governmental involvement Partial FFELP student loan exemption Exempt if guaranteed as to 100 percent of defaulted principal and accrued interest 2 percent if guaranteed as to at least 98 percent of defaulted principal and accrued interest 3 percent if guaranteed as to at least 97 percent of defaulted principal and accrued interest Blended pool uses highest risk retention requirement 26

Credit Risk Retention: What other exemptions are there? (cont.) Two limited resecuritization exemptions Single class pass-through exemption Underlying must comply with risk retention Single class, full pass-through of P&I Multiple class securitizations of first-pay classes of RMBS First-pay class is entitled to the same priority of payment and entitled to P&I prior to or pro rata with all other classes (except for POs or IOs) Underlying must comply with risk retention No credit tranching, only reallocation of prepayment risk 27

Credit Risk Retention: What other exemptions are there? (cont.) Exemption for transactions collateralized solely by seasoned loans Residential mortgage loan must have been outstanding and performing for the longer of five years, or until its outstanding principal balance has been reduced to 25 percent of the original principal balance, but no longer than seven years Any other loan must have been outstanding and performing for the longer of two years, or until its outstanding principal balance has been reduced to 33 percent of the original principal balance No loan may have been modified or delinquent for 30 days or more 28

Credit Risk Retention: Can you transfer, hedge or finance? Generally, sponsor may not transfer its retained risk, or hedge its retained risk if it would limit financial exposure There are some permitted hedges: Tied to interest rates, currency exchange rates or home prices Tied to other sponsors securities Tied to an index, as long as the ABS in the deal represent no more than 10 percent of the dollar-weighted average of all instruments in the index (and ABS in all deals where the sponsor must retain risk represent no more than 20 percent) Prohibition includes hedges at the issuer level that benefit the retained interest Any financing of retained risk must be full recourse to the borrower 29

Credit Risk Retention: Can you transfer, hedge or finance? (cont.) For ABS other than RMBS, restrictions sunset on the latest of: Unpaid principal balance ( UPB ) of the pool assets is 33 percent of the cut-off date UPB UPB of the ABS interests is 33 percent of the closing date UPB Two years after the closing date For RMBS, restrictions sunset on the later of: Five years after the closing date UPB of the underlying mortgages has been reduced to 25 percent of the closing date UPB, but no later than seven years after closing date. For CMBS, a retained B-piece may be transferred to another qualified buyer five years after closing For revolving pool, no sunset for restrictions on seller s interest 30

Credit Risk Retention: Foreign Transactions There is a limited safe harbor for foreign transactions, which applies only if: securities are not registered under the Securities Act no more than 10 percent of dollar value of ABS interests are sold or transferred to U.S. persons neither sponsor nor issuing entity is organized under U.S. law no more than 25 percent of UPB of pool assets were acquired from U.S. majority-owned affiliate Limited nature of safe harbor and incompatibility with EU risk retention regime are significant concerns 31

Credit Risk Retention: How long do we have? Adoption and effective dates Adopted October 21-22, 2014 For RMBS, effective one year after the date of publication in the Federal Register For all other asset classes, effective two years after the date of publication in the Federal Register 32

The Volcker Rule: What are the covered fund restrictions? A banking entity generally may not sponsor, or own an ownership interest in, a covered fund A banking entity generally is: An insured depository institution A company that controls an insured depository institution A bank holding company Any affiliate or subsidiary of any of the foregoing Most securitization concerns have focused on the covered fund restrictions 33

The Volcker Rule: What is a covered fund? Generally, a covered fund is an issuer that would be an investment company, as defined in the Investment Company Act, but for Section 3(c)(1) (the 100 holder exemption) or Section 3(c)(7) (the qualified purchaser exemption) A securitization vehicle that can rely on any exemption from requirements of the Investment Company Act other than Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) generally is not a covered fund Therefore, a securitization vehicle that relies on Rule 3a-7 (for certain asset-backed securities) or Rule 3(c)(5) (certain sales financing and real estate financing funds) is not a covered fund CLOs generally do not qualify for Rule 3a-7 because of active pool management 34

The Volcker Rule: What is an ownership interest? An ownership interest is any equity, partnership, or other similar interest An other similar interest has any of the following characteristics: Right to participate in the selection or removal of general partner, managing member, member of board of directors or trustees, investment manager or investment adviser Right to receive a share of the income, gains or profits (regardless of whether pro rata) Right to receive the underlying assets after all other interests have paid (a residual ) Right to receive all or a portion of excess spread May be reduced based on losses on underlying assets, such as allocation of losses, write-downs or charge-offs 35

The Volcker Rule: What is an ownership interest? (cont.) An other similar interest has any of the following characteristics (cont.): Receives income on a pass-through basis or has a rate of return determined by reference to the performance of the underlying assets Any synthetic right to any of the foregoing There are interpretive questions, but broadly interpreted, many of these could apply to most ABS interests 36

The Volcker Rule: What is a sponsor? A banking entity is a sponsor of a covered fund if the banking entity: Serves as a general partner, managing member, trustee, or commodity pool operator of the fund In any manner selects or controls a majority of the directors, trustees, or management Shares the same name or a variant Differs significantly from Reg. AB definition, but no special rules for securitization transactions analysis is fact-specific 37

The Volcker Rule: What is the loan securitization exemption? An issuer of Exchange Act ABS is not a covered fund if the asset pool consists solely of loans and certain related assets A loan includes any loan, lease, extension of credit, or secured or unsecured receivable that is not a security or derivative. Securities (including other ABS) and derivatives generally may not be included in the collateral pool This excludes resecuritizations and synthetics Most CLOs have included securities buckets CLO 3.0 generally excludes the securities bucket in order to qualify for the loan securitization exemption There also are exemptions for: Qualifying asset-backed commercial paper conduits Qualifying covered bond structures 38

The Volcker Rule: What are the rest of the covered fund restrictions? A banking entity generally must limit aggregate ownership interest in a covered fund to 3 percent of fair market value of the ownership interests (or any greater credit risk retention requirement), and in all covered funds to 3 percent of tier 1 capital In limited circumstances, a banking entity may: Sponsor a covered fund Underwrite an offering by a covered fund Make markets in ownership interests in a covered fund Underwriting and market-maker inventory count toward limits on ownership interests Super 23A could limit the ability to provide liquidity, servicing advances or other customary credit to, or repurchase assets from, a covered fund 39

The Volcker Rule: What are the proprietary trading restrictions? Banking entities generally will be prohibited from proprietary trading, which is broadly defined to include engaging as principal in the purchase or sale of any financial instrument (regardless of whether it is an ownership interest in a covered fund) Exemptions for repurchase financings and securities lending arrangements Limited exemption for underwriting and private placement activities, which prohibit a banking entity from purchasing more securities than necessary to meet reasonably expected near-term market demand Limited exemption for market-making, which requires inventory to be designed not to exceed reasonably expected near-term market demand 40

The Volcker Rule: How long do we have? Generally, a banking entity must bring its activities and investments into compliance with the Volcker Rule no later than July 21, 2015 Banking entities must engage in good-faith efforts that will result in their conformance to all requirements no later than the end of the conformance period Good faith efforts include: Evaluating the extent to which the banking entity is engaged in activities and investments covered by the Volcker Rule Developing and implementing a specific plan for full compliance by the end of the conformance period 41

Questions? Reed D. Auerbach reed.auerbach@morganlewis.com Daniel Budofsky daniel.budofsky@morganlewis.com Charles A. Sweet charles.sweet@morganlewis.com 42

This material is provided as a general informational service to clients and friends of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. It does not constitute, and should not be construed as, legal advice on any specific matter, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship. You should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of this information. This material may be considered Attorney Advertising in some states. Any prior results discussed in the material do not guarantee similar outcomes. Links provided from outside sources are subject to expiration or change. 2014 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. All Rights Reserved. 43

international presence Almaty Astana Beijing Boston Brussels Chicago Dallas Dubai Frankfurt Harrisburg Hartford Houston London Los Angeles Miami Moscow New York Orange County Paris Philadelphia Pittsburgh Princeton San Francisco Santa Monica Silicon Valley Tokyo Washington Wilmington