121 ISMR A. Importance of corporate governance in the capital market Good corporate governance standards are essential for the integrity of corporations, financial institutions and markets and have a bearing on the growth and stability of the economy. Over the past decade and a half, India has made significant strides in the areas of corporate governance reforms, which have improved public trust in the market. These reforms have been well received by the investors, including the foreign institutional investors (FIIs). A compelling evidence of the improving standards comes from the growing interest of FIIs in the Indian market; gross FII portfolio investment has risen from USD 2.7 billion in FY 1996 to USD 203.2 billion in FY 2014. Governance reforms and globalization of the capital markets have been mutually reinforcing. While continuing governance reforms have led to rising foreign investment, globalization of the capital markets has provided an impetus toward a more stringent corporate governance regime by the Indian industry itself. To market their securities to foreign investors, Indian companies making public offerings in India were persuaded to comply with corporate governance norms that investors in the developed world were familiar with. Further, Indian companies listing abroad to raise capital were subject to stiff corporate governance requirements applicable to listing on those Exchanges. They also adhered to the norms and practices of corporate governance applicable to markets where they listed their securities. It must however be recognized that such practices have remained largely confined to only some large companies and have not percolated to majority of Indian companies. International comparison According to the Doing Business 2015 a World Bank study India ranks 142 among 189 countries in 2015 on the ease of doing business rank, below its ranking of 140 in 2014. While India is almost at the bottom of the ranking on account of dealing with construction permits and enforcing contracts, it ranks 7 th in the world in terms of protecting minority investors. (Please see table-1) Table-1: India s rank in ease of doing business and other indicators Year Ease of Doing Business Rank Starting a Business Dealing with Construction Permits Getting Credit Getting Electricity Registering Property Protecting Minority Investors Paying Taxes Trading Across Bolders Enforcing Contracts Resolving Insolvency 2014 140 156 183 134 115 30 21 154 122 186 135 2015 142 158 184 137 121 36 7 156 126 186 137 Source: Doing Business 2015, World Bank
ISMR 122 Protecting minority investors is considered as an important indicator of corporate governance. India has fared better than China, Brazil and Russia (See Table-2). It may be noted that India has been outperforming other BRIC countries persistently over the past 6 years. On the strength of minority investor protection index, with an overall score of 7.3 out of 10, India beats the South Asia average of 5.3 and OECD average of 6.3. Table-2: Country wise ranking in terms of protecting investors Parameters India China Brazil Russia USA UK Protecting minority investors (rank) 7 132 35 100 25 4 Extent of disclosure Index (0-10) 7 10 5 6 7.4 10 Extent of director liability index (0-10) 6 1 8 2 8.6 7 Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) 7 4 4 7 9 8 Extent of conflict of interest regulation index (0-10) 6.7 5 5.7 5 8.3 8.3 Extent of shareholder rights index (0-10.5) 9 3 7.5 7.5 5.1 8 Strength of governance structure index (0-10.5) 6 2 5.5 3 2.9 6 Extent of corporate transparency index (0-9) 8.5 7 7.5 5 6.5 8 Extent of shareholder governance index (0-10) 7.8 4 6.8 5.2 4.8 7.3 Strength of minority investor protection index (0-10) 7.3 4.5 6.3 5.1 6.6 7.8 Source: Doing Business 2015, World Bank Please see box-1 which explains on what each of the above indicators of protecting minority investors measure. Box-1: What Protecting Minority Investors Indicators Measure Extent of disclosure index (0 10) Review and approval requirements for related-party transactions; Disclosure requirements for related-party transactions. Extent of director liability index (0 10) Ability of minority shareholders to sue and hold interested directors liable for prejudicial related-party transactions; Available legal remedies (damages, disgorgement of profits, fines, imprisonment and rescission of the transaction). Ease of shareholder suits index (0 10) Access to internal corporate documents; Evidence obtainable during trial and allocation of legal expenses. Extent of conflict of interest regulation index (0 10) Sum of the extent of disclosure, extent of director liability and ease of shareholder indices, divided by 3. Extent of shareholder rights index (0-10.5) Shareholders rights and role in major corporate decisions. Strength of governance structure index (0-10.5) Governance safeguards protecting shareholders from undue board control and entrenchment. Extent of corporate transparency index (0-9) Corporate transparency on ownership stakes, compensation, audits and financial prospects. Extent of shareholder governance index (0 10) Sum of the extent of shareholders rights, strength of governance structure and extent of corporate transparency indices, divided by 3. Strength of investor protection index (0 10) Simple average of the extent of conflict of interest regulation and extent of shareholder governance indices. Source: Doing Business 2015, World Bank
123 ISMR Another recent study (CG Watch 2014: Corporate governance in Asia) 1 puts India in the seventh position among the Asian countries, in terms of overall CG score. Although India s overall CG Watch market score has increased from 51 in 2012 to 54 in 2014, its overall ranking has remained the same. The sharp increase in scores of two categories such as CG Rules and Practices and CG Culture mainly contributed to the increase in overall market score. (See table-3) Table-3: Corporate governance quality market category scores in percent Rank. Country Total CG Rules & Practices Enforcement Political & Regulatory IGAAP CG Culture 1. = Hong Kong 65 61 71 69 72 51 1. = Singapore 64 63 56 64 85 54 3. Japan 60 48 62 61 72 55 4. = Thailand 58 62 51 48 80 50 4. = Malaysia 58 55 47 59 85 43 6. Taiwan 56 48 47 63 75 47 7. India 54 57 46 58 57 51 8. Korea 49 46 46 45 72 34 9. China 45 42 40 44 67 34 10. = Philippines 40 40 18 42 65 33 10. = Indonesia 39 34 24 44 62 32 Source: CG Watch 2014 Corporate Governance in Asia, CLSA Asia-Pacific Markets B. Reforms in CG framework for listed companies During the current fiscal year up to September 2014, the changes made to the CG framework for listed companies in India were mainly driven by two circulars by SEBI. The objectives of the first circular (dated April 17, 2014) was to review the provisions of the Listing Agreement to align with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, adopt best practices on corporate governance and to make the corporate governance framework more effective. The second circular (dated September 15, 2014) was aimed to make certain amendments to Clause 49; this circular was issued because SEBI had received representations from market participants including companies and industry associations, highlighting certain practical difficulties in ensuring compliance, seeking clarifications on interpretation of certain provisions and suggesting various options to ease the process of implementation. Most of the provisions have been made applicable to all listed companies with effect from October 1, 2014. Some of the key provisions are given below: I. Board of Directors The Board of Directors of the company shall have an optimum combination of executive and nonexecutive directors with at least one woman director (shall be applicable w.e.f. April 01, 2015) and not less than fifty percent of the Board of Directors comprising non-executive directors. Where the Chairman of the Board is a non-executive director, at least one-third of the Board should comprise independent directors and in case the company does not have a regular non-executive Chairman, at least half of the Board should comprise independent directors. A person shall not serve as an independent director in more than seven listed companies. Further, any person who is serving as a whole time director in any listed company shall serve as an independent director in not more than three listed companies. The maximum tenure of independent directors shall be in accordance with the Companies Act, 2013 and clarifications / circulars issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in this regard, from time to time. 1 This was conducted by CLSA Asia Pacific Markets in collaboration with Asian Corporate Governance Association (ACGA)
ISMR 124 [As per the Companies Act, 2013, an independent director shall hold office for a term up to five consecutive years on the Board of a company, but shall be eligible for reappointment on passing of a special resolution by the company. No independent director shall hold office for more than two consecutive terms, but such independent director shall be eligible for appointment after the expiration of three years of ceasing to become an independent director provided that during the said period of three years, the independent director shall not be associated with the company in any other capacity, either directly or indirectly.] The performance evaluation of independent directors shall be done by the entire Board of Directors (excluding the director being evaluated). On the basis of the report of performance evaluation, it shall be determined whether to extend or continue the term of appointment of the independent director. The company shall familiarise the independent directors with the company, their roles, rights, responsibilities in the company, nature of the industry in which the company operates, business model of the company, etc., through various programmes. The company shall establish a vigil mechanism for directors and employees to report concerns about unethical behaviour, actual or suspected fraud or violation of the company s code of conduct or ethics policy. II. III. Audit Committee The audit committee shall have minimum three directors as members. Two-thirds of the members of audit committee shall be independent directors. The Chairman of the Audit Committee shall be an independent director. All members of audit committee shall be financially literate and at least one member shall have accounting or related financial management expertise. The Audit Committee should meet at least four times in a year and not more than four months shall elapse between two meetings. The role of the Audit Committee shall include: - Oversight of the company s financial reporting process and the disclosure of its financial information to ensure that the financial statement is correct, sufficient and credible; - Review and monitor the auditor s independence and performance, and effectiveness of audit process. Nomination and Remuneration Committee The company through its Board of Directors shall constitute the nomination and remuneration committee which shall comprise at least three directors, all of whom shall be non-executive directors and at least half shall be independent. Chairman of the committee shall be an independent director. The chairperson of the company (whether executive or nonexecutive) may be appointed as a member of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee but shall not chair such Committee. The role of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee shall include: - Formulation of the criteria for determining qualifications, positive attributes and independence of a director; and recommend to the Board a policy relating to the remuneration of the directors, key managerial personnel and other employees; - Formulation of criteria for evaluation of Independent Directors and the Board; - Devising a policy on Board diversity;
125 ISMR IV. Subsidiary Companies At least one independent director on the Board of Directors of the holding company shall be a director on the Board of Directors of a material non-listed Indian subsidiary company. The company shall formulate a policy for determining material. A subsidiary shall be considered as material if the investment of the company in the subsidiary exceeds 20% of its consolidated net worth as per the audited balance sheet of the previous financial year or if the subsidiary has generated 20% of the consolidated income of the company during the previous financial year. No company shall dispose of shares in its material subsidiary which would reduce its shareholding (either on its own or together with other subsidiaries) to less than 50% or cease the exercise of control over the subsidiary without passing a special resolution in its General Meeting except in cases where such divestment is made under a scheme of arrangement duly approved by a Court/Tribunal. Selling, disposing and leasing of assets amounting to more than 20% of the assets of the material subsidiary on an aggregate basis during a financial year shall require prior approval of shareholders by way of special resolution, unless the sale/disposal/lease is made under a scheme of arrangement duly approved by a Court/ Tribunal. V. Risk Management VI. The Board shall be responsible for framing, implementing and monitoring the risk management plan for the company. The company through its Board of Directors shall constitute a Risk Management Committee. The Board shall define the roles and responsibilities of the Risk Management Committee and may delegate monitoring and reviewing of the risk management plan to the committee and such other functions as it may deem fit. The majority of Committee shall consist of members of the Board of Directors. Senior executives of the company may be members of the said Committee but the Chairman of the Committee shall be a member of the Board of Directors. Related Party Transactions A Related Party Transaction (RPT) is a transfer of resources, services or obligations between a company and a related party, regardless of whether a price is charged. The company shall formulate a policy on materiality of Related Party Transactions and also on dealing with Related Party Transactions. - A transaction with a related party shall be considered material if the transaction/ transactions to be entered into individually or taken together with previous transactions during a financial year, exceeds 10% of the annual consolidated turnover of the company as per the last audited financial statements of the company. All Related Party Transactions shall require prior approval of the Audit Committee. However, the Audit Committee may grant omnibus approval for Related Party Transactions proposed to be entered into by the company subject to the following conditions: - Such approval shall be applicable in respect of transactions which are repetitive in nature. - The Audit Committee shall satisfy itself the need for such omnibus approval and that such approval is in the interest of the company. - The Audit Committee shall review, at least on a quarterly basis, the details of RPTs entered into by the company pursuant to each of the omnibus approval given.
ISMR 126 VII. - Such approvals shall be valid for a period not exceeding one year and shall require fresh approvals after the expiry of one year. All material Related Party Transactions shall require approval of the shareholders through special resolution and the related parties shall abstain from voting on such resolutions. Disclosures Details of all material RPTs shall be disclosed quarterly along with the compliance report on corporate governance. As part of the directors report or as an addition thereto, a Management Discussion and Analysis report should form part of the Annual Report to the shareholders. In case of the appointment of a new director or re-appointment of a director, the shareholders must be provided with the following information: - A brief resume of the director; - Nature of his expertise in specific functional areas; - Names of companies in which the person also holds the directorship and the membership of Committees of the Board; and - Shareholding of non-executive director. VIII. Report on Corporate Governance There shall be a separate section on Corporate Governance in the Annual Reports of company, with a detailed compliance report on Corporate Governance. Non-compliance of any mandatory requirement of this clause with reasons thereof and the extent to which the non-mandatory requirements (See Box-2) have been adopted should be specifically highlighted. The companies shall submit a quarterly compliance report to the stock exchanges within 15 days from the close of quarter as per the prescribed format. Box-2: Non-Mandatory Requirements 1. The Board The Board - A non-executive Chairman may be entitled to maintain a Chairman's office at the company's expense and also allowed reimbursement of expenses incurred in performance of his duties. 2. Shareholder Rights A half-yearly declaration of financial performance including summary of the significant events in last six-months, may be sent to each household of shareholders. 3. Audit qualifications Company may move towards a regime of unqualified financial statements. 4. Separate posts of Chairman and CEO The company may appoint separate persons to the post of Chairman and Managing Director/CEO. 5. Reporting of Internal Auditor The Internal auditor may report directly to the Audit Committee.
127 ISMR C. NSE-IGIDR International Conference on Corporate Governance The National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSE) jointly with the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research (IGIDR) organized an international conference on Corporate Governance (CG) during July 10-11, 2014 in Mumbai. The conference was a part of the research initiative in CG undertaken by the NSE in collaboration with the IGIDR. Shri U. K. Sinha, SEBI Chairman, delivered the Chief Guest s address. The conference featured two panel discussions on: (a) Regulatory Approach to Corporate Governance: Comply or Explain and (b) Corporate Governance in Financial Institutions. Six research papers selected through a global call for papers were presented during the conference. Besides NSE, representatives of regulatory bodies (such as SEBI and RBI), company secretaries, some reputed Directors and academics participated in the conference. D. Quarterly Briefings under the aegis of the NSE Centre for Excellence in Corporate Governance (NSE CECG) In recognition of the important role that stock exchanges play in enhancing the CG standards, the NSE had established a Centre for Excellence in Corporate Governance (NSE CECG) in 2012. This is an independent expert advisory body comprising eminent domain experts, academics and practitioners. The Committee meets from time to time to discuss CG issues and developments. The Quarterly Briefing, a note that offers an analysis of one emerging or existing CG issue, is a product emerging from these discussions. In 2014, the Centre has brought out four issues of the Quarterly Briefing on the following topics: a) Comply or Explain: An Alternate Approach to Corporate Governance b) Directors Duties and Liabilities in the New Era c) Corporate Social Responsibility under Companies Act, 2013 d) Board Evaluations All the issues of Quarterly Briefing can be accessed on the following link in the NSE website: http:///research/content/res_nse_cecg.htm