δ j 1 (S j S j 1 ) (2.3) j=1

Similar documents
In chapter 5, we approximated the Black-Scholes model

The discounted portfolio value of a selffinancing strategy in discrete time was given by. δ tj 1 (s tj s tj 1 ) (9.1) j=1

The Multistep Binomial Model

Real Options and Game Theory in Incomplete Markets

1 Parameterization of Binomial Models and Derivation of the Black-Scholes PDE.

B8.3 Week 2 summary 2018

MATH 425: BINOMIAL TREES

QF101 Solutions of Week 12 Tutorial Questions Term /2018

2 The binomial pricing model

From Discrete Time to Continuous Time Modeling

Notes: This is a closed book and closed notes exam. The maximal score on this exam is 100 points. Time: 75 minutes

The investment game in incomplete markets.

Computational Finance. Computational Finance p. 1

The Binomial Model. Chapter 3

Dynamic Portfolio Choice II

A1: American Options in the Binomial Model

Analysis of a highly migratory fish stocks fishery: a game theoretic approach

Stochastic Processes and Stochastic Calculus - 9 Complete and Incomplete Market Models

FINANCIAL OPTION ANALYSIS HANDOUTS

LECTURE 2: MULTIPERIOD MODELS AND TREES

Lecture 17 Option pricing in the one-period binomial model.

Help Session 2. David Sovich. Washington University in St. Louis

Notes: This is a closed book and closed notes exam. The maximal score on this exam is 100 points. Time: 75 minutes

Introduction to Financial Mathematics

Forwards and Futures. Chapter Basics of forwards and futures Forwards

Martingale Pricing Theory in Discrete-Time and Discrete-Space Models

Combining Real Options and game theory in incomplete markets.

Dynamic Hedging and PDE Valuation

MATH 425 EXERCISES G. BERKOLAIKO

market opportunity line fair odds line Example 6.6, p. 120.

Economathematics. Problem Sheet 1. Zbigniew Palmowski. Ws 2 dw s = 1 t

The normal distribution is a theoretical model derived mathematically and not empirically.

Study Guide and Review - Chapter 2

Revenue Management Under the Markov Chain Choice Model

Homework Assignments

4: SINGLE-PERIOD MARKET MODELS

Lecture 16: Delta Hedging

The investment game in incomplete markets

MATH3075/3975 FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS TUTORIAL PROBLEMS

Finance: A Quantitative Introduction Chapter 7 - part 2 Option Pricing Foundations

Risk-neutral Binomial Option Valuation

Martingale Approach to Pricing and Hedging

October An Equilibrium of the First Price Sealed Bid Auction for an Arbitrary Distribution.

non linear Payoffs Markus K. Brunnermeier

Pricing levered warrants with dilution using observable variables

3.1 Properties of Binomial Coefficients

Option Pricing Models for European Options

Futures Contracts vs. Forward Contracts

Introduction to Binomial Trees. Chapter 12

Advanced Topics in Derivative Pricing Models. Topic 4 - Variance products and volatility derivatives

Chapter 8 Sequences, Series, and the Binomial Theorem

Sequences, Series, and Probability Part I

Homework 2: Dynamic Moral Hazard

The Measurement Procedure of AB2017 in a Simplified Version of McGrattan 2017

Options. An Undergraduate Introduction to Financial Mathematics. J. Robert Buchanan. J. Robert Buchanan Options

Discrete time interest rate models

2 Deduction in Sentential Logic

THE USE OF NUMERAIRES IN MULTI-DIMENSIONAL BLACK- SCHOLES PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS. Hyong-chol O *, Yong-hwa Ro **, Ning Wan*** 1.

Term Structure Lattice Models

Value of Flexibility in Managing R&D Projects Revisited

Class Notes on Financial Mathematics. No-Arbitrage Pricing Model

ELEMENTS OF MATRIX MATHEMATICS

Introduction Random Walk One-Period Option Pricing Binomial Option Pricing Nice Math. Binomial Models. Christopher Ting.

The Capital Asset Pricing Model as a corollary of the Black Scholes model

MAC Learning Objectives. Learning Objectives (Cont.)

Department of Economics The Ohio State University Final Exam Answers Econ 8712

Outline One-step model Risk-neutral valuation Two-step model Delta u&d Girsanov s Theorem. Binomial Trees. Haipeng Xing

ECE 586BH: Problem Set 5: Problems and Solutions Multistage games, including repeated games, with observed moves

Queens College, CUNY, Department of Computer Science Computational Finance CSCI 365 / 765 Fall 2017 Instructor: Dr. Sateesh Mane.

Binomial Model for Forward and Futures Options

ACTSC 445 Final Exam Summary Asset and Liability Management

Hedging and Pricing in the Binomial Model

Lecture 1 Definitions from finance

Stochastic Differential Equations in Finance and Monte Carlo Simulations

Some Computational Aspects of Martingale Processes in ruling the Arbitrage from Binomial asset Pricing Model

Lecture 8. The Binomial Distribution. Binomial Distribution. Binomial Distribution. Probability Distributions: Normal and Binomial

Chapter 10 Inventory Theory

Introduction to Binomial Trees. Chapter 12

Two Equivalent Conditions

The Neoclassical Growth Model

5.6 Special Products of Polynomials

An Approximation Algorithm for Capacity Allocation over a Single Flight Leg with Fare-Locking

Solutions to Midterm Exam. ECON Financial Economics Boston College, Department of Economics Spring Tuesday, March 19, 10:30-11:45am

10.1 Elimination of strictly dominated strategies

The Theory of Interest

1. In this exercise, we can easily employ the equations (13.66) (13.70), (13.79) (13.80) and

The Binomial Lattice Model for Stocks: Introduction to Option Pricing

Help Session 4. David Sovich. Washington University in St. Louis

Advanced Numerical Methods

Chapter 14. The Multi-Underlying Black-Scholes Model and Correlation

Introduction to Supply and Use Tables, part 3 Input-Output Tables 1

Pricing theory of financial derivatives

13.3 A Stochastic Production Planning Model

6.4 Solving Linear Inequalities by Using Addition and Subtraction

American options and early exercise

Introduction to Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes for Finance Lecture Notes

Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports

Financial Mathematics I Notes

Finite Memory and Imperfect Monitoring

3 Stock under the risk-neutral measure

Transcription:

Chapter The Binomial Model Let S be some tradable asset with prices and let S k = St k ), k = 0, 1,,....1) H = HS 0, S 1,..., S N 1, S N ).) be some option payoff with start date t 0 and end date or maturity t N. We want to replicate the option payoff.) with a suitable trading strategy in the underlying S. For notational simplicity let us assume first that we have zero interest rates r = 0. From the last chapter we know that a trading strategy holding δ k assets at the end of day t k generates the amount V N = V 0 + δ j 1 S j S j 1 ).3) Each δ k will be determined on the end of trading day t k. On such a day, the asset prices S 0, S 1,..., S k are known, but the asset prices S, S k+,..., S N are not known yet, they are lying in the future. Thus, δ k can be a function only of the known prices S 0,..., S k, δ k = δ k S 0, S 1,..., S k 1, S k ).4) Definition.1: We say that an option payoff.) can be replicated by a suitable trading strategy in the underlying if and only if there are choices of δ k of the form.4) and some initial amount V 0 such that in case of zero interest rates) HS 0, S 1,..., S N 1, S N ) = V 0 + δ j 1 S j S j 1 ).5) The initial amount V 0 which is needed to set up the replicating strategy is called the theoretical fair value of H. 11

1 Chapter Now let us consider the question to what extent replication of options is possible. Equation.5) can be rewritten as or HS 0, S 1,..., S N 1, S N ) = V N 1 + δ N 1 S N S N 1 ) HS 0, S 1,..., S N 1, S N ) δ N 1 S N = V N 1 δ N 1 S N 1 = some function of S 0, S 1,..., S N 1.6) That is, the right hand side of.6) is independent of S N. Let us introduce the return of the asset S from t k 1 to t k, such that Then equation.6) can be rewritten as ret k := S k S k 1 S k 1 = S k S k 1 1.7) S k = S k 1 1 + ret k ).8) H S 0, S 1,..., S N 1, S N 1 1 + ret N ) ) δ N 1 S N 1 1 + ret N ) = const.9) where the const in the equation above means that the left hand side of.9) has to be the same for all possible choices of ret N. Since there is only 1 free parameter in.9), namely δ N 1, we can only allow for possible choices for ret N, say, and in that case we have to have ret N {ret up, ret }.10) H S 0, S 1,..., S N 1, S N 1 1 + ret up ) ) δ N 1 S N 1 1 + ret up ) = H S 0, S 1,..., S N 1, S N 1 1 + ret ) ) δ N 1 S N 1 1 + ret ) which determines δ N 1 to δ N 1 = H S 0,..., S N 1, S N 1 1 + ret up ) ) H S 0,..., S N 1, S N 1 1 + ret ) ) S N 1 1 + ret up ) S N 1 1 + ret ).11) Thus, if we allow for possible choices of returns only as in.10), replication of option payoffs seem to be possible. This leads to the following

Chapter 13 Definition.: If the price process S k = St k ) of some tradable asset S has the dynamics S k = S k 1 1 + ret k ) with ret k {ret up, ret } k = 1,,....1) then we say that S is given by the Binomial model. Remark: Observe that in Definition. we have not introduced any probabilities for an up- or -move, that is, we have not specified a probability p up such that an up-return ret up will occur and a probability p = 1 p up for the occurence of a -return. We did that because the replicating strategy and the theoretical option fair value V 0 are actually independent of such probabilities. Nevertheless we have to remark that the definition of the Binomial model as given in the standard literature usually includes a specification of p up and p = 1 p up. Now we are in a position to formulate the following important Theorem.1: Let S be some tradable asset whose price process is given by the Binomial model.1). Let r 0 denote some constant interest rate. Then every option payoff H = HS 0,..., S N ) can be replicated. A replicating strategy is given by, for k = 0, 1,..., N 1: δ k = V S0,..., S k, S k 1 + ret up ) ) V S0,..., S k, S k 1 + ret ) ).13) S k 1 + ret up ) S k 1 + ret ) and the portfolio values V k, including the theoretical fair value V 0, can be inductively calculated through the formulae V k = 1 d k, d k, ret )V up 1 d k, d k, ret up )V.14) ret up ret V N = H where we used the abbreviations and introduced the discount factor V up, := V S0,..., S k, S k 1 + ret up, ) ).15) d k, := e rt t k ).16) Proof: For nonzero interest rates we have v N = v 0 + δ j 1 s j s j 1 )

14 Chapter which is equivalent to or, since v k = e rt k t 0 ) V k, v = v k + δ k s s k ) k = 0, 1,..., N 1 e rt t k ) V = V k + δ k e rt t k ) S k 1 + ret k ) S k ) Since we assume the price dynamics of the Binomial model, this equation is equivalent to ) e rt t k ) V up = V k + δ k e rt t k ) S k 1 + ret up ) S k ) e rt t k ) V = V k + δ k e rt t k ) S k 1 + ret ) S k Subtracting.18) from.17) gives.17).18) e rt t k ) V up V ) = δ k e rt t k ) S k 1 + ret up ) e rt t k ) S k 1 + ret ) ) or δ k = V up V S k 1 + ret up ) S k 1 + ret ).19) which coincides with.13). Substituting this value of δ k in equation.17) and solving for V k gives now using the abbreviation.16) for the discount factors) d k, V up δ ks k dk, 1 + ret up ) 1 ) = V k V k = d k, V up V up V dk, 1 + ret up ) 1 ) ret up ret = d k,v up ret up ret ) V up = V up = V up dk, 1 + ret ) 1 ) + V ret up ret 1 dk, 1 + ret ) ) V ret up ret and this coincides with.14). dk, 1 + ret up ) 1 ) + V dk, 1 + ret up ) 1 ) ret up ret dk, 1 + ret up ) 1 ) 1 dk, 1 + ret up ) ) Remarks: 1) If H is some then usually called european ) option which depends only on the underlying price at maturity, H = HS N ).0)

Chapter 15 then the δ k and the value of the replicating portfolio V k at t k depend only on the asset price S k and do not depend on earlier prices S k 1, S k,..., S 0. That is, V k = V k S k ).1) δ k = δ k S k ).) ) Assume zero interest rates such that d k, = 1. Then.14) becomes V k = ret V up + ret upv ret up ret = V up + V ret up + ret V up V.3) ret up ret If we further assume a symmetric Binomial model with ret up = q% and ret = q% we obtain the simple recursion formula V k = V up + V.4)