PRELIMINARY DISTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT

Similar documents
DISTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT AS PASSED BY THE HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE

DISTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT AS PASSED BY THE SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE

DISTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT AS PASSED BY THE SENATE

DISTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE CONFERENCE AGREEMENT FOR THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT

WINNERS AND LOSERS AFTER PAYING FOR THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT

UPDATED EFFECTS OF THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT ON REPRESENTATIVE FAMILIES

The Distribution of Federal Taxes, Jeffrey Rohaly

REFORMING CHARITABLE TAX INCENTIVES: ASSESSING EVIDENCE AND POLICY OPTIONS

THE TAX REFORM TRADEOFF: ELIMINATING TAX EXPENDITURES, REDUCING RATES

An Analysis of the 2004 House Tax Cuts. Leonard E. Burman 1 The Urban Institute and The Tax Policy Center. June 2004

Options to Limit the Benefit of Tax Expenditures for High-Income Households

TCJA Individual Tax Provisions and the States

The Debate over Expiring Tax Cuts: What about the Deficit? Adam Looney

The Debate over Expiring Tax Cuts: What about the Deficit? Adam Looney*

Updated Tables for Using a VAT to Reform the Income Tax

Senator Kerry s Tax Proposals. Leonard E. Burman and Jeffrey Rohaly 1 Revised July 23, 2004

PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF THE FAMILY FAIRNESS AND OPPORTUNITY TAX REFORM ACT

Options to Fix the AMT

UPDATED OPTIONS TO REFORM THE DEDUCTION FOR HOME MORTGAGE INTEREST. Amanda Eng Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center May 7, 2014

Taxes Primer September 27, 2013

AN ANALYSIS OF TED CRUZ S TAX PLAN

Details and Analysis of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

Abuse of tax deductions for charitable donations of conservation lands are on the rise

AN OPTION TO REFORM THE INCOME TAX TREATMENT OF FAMILIES AND WORK

Revised November 21, 2008

AN ANALYSIS OF GOVERNOR BUSH S TAX PLAN

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE COST ESTIMATE. Reconciliation Recommendations of the Senate Committee on Finance

2 TRENDS IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME BETWEEN 1979 AND 27 Summary Figure 1. Growth in Real After-Tax Income from 1979 to L

THE NATIONAL COMMISSION ON FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY AND REFORM. The Moment of Truth

THE TAX POLICY. BRIEFING BOOK A Citizens' Guide for the 2008 Election and Beyond

Preliminary Details and Analysis of the Senate s 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

Notes and Definitions Numbers in the text, tables, and figures may not add up to totals because of rounding. Dollar amounts are generally rounded to t

Notes and Definitions Numbers in the text, tables, and figures may not add up to totals because of rounding. Dollar amounts are generally rounded to t

The Child and Dependent Care Credit: Impact of Selected Policy Options

Desperately Seeking Revenue

Comparison of the Coalition Federal Budget Income Tax Measures and the Labor Proposal

I S S U E B R I E F PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE PPI PRESIDENT BUSH S TAX PLAN: IMPACTS ON AGE AND INCOME GROUPS

Effects of Imposing a Value Added Tax to Replace Payroll or Corporate Taxes

EFFECTS OF THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT: A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS

SPECIAL REPORT. IMPACT. Many of the changes to the Internal Revenue Code in the INDIVIDUALS

HOW DO WE TAX THE INCOME OF ENTREPRENEURS?

The Beacon Hill Institute

Tax Policy Issues and Options

Our Tax System Revealed. Lee R. Nackman, Ph.D. October 24, 2018

SPECIAL REPORT. IMPACT. Many of the changes to the Internal Revenue Code in the INDIVIDUALS

HIGHLIGHTS OF THE 2017 HOUSE TAX REFORM BILL

U.S. Senate & House of Representatives Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Proposals Relevant to Charitable Donors. December 14, 2017

Effects of Limiting Charitable Deductions on Nonprofit Finances

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: Mobility and Rewards Comparison of current US tax reform proposals December 4, 2017

Tax Reform Options: Promoting Retirement Security. Testimony Submitted to United States Senate Committee on Finance. September 15, 2011

Impact of Federal Tax Reform on New York City

OVERALL FEDERAL TAX BURDEN ON MOST FAMILIES AT LOWEST LEVELS SINCE AT LEAST Income Taxes for Median Family of Four at Lowest Level Since 1957

CBO MEMORANDUM ESTIMATES OF FEDERAL TAX LIABILITIES FOR INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES BY INCOME CATEGORY AND FAMILY TYPE FOR 1995 AND 1999.

EVALUATING BROAD-BASED APPROACHES FOR LIMITING TAX EXPENDITURES

Tax Reform Legislation Issues of Concern to ECFC Member and their Clients

THE INDIVIDUAL ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX: HISTORICAL DATA

SPECIAL REPORT. IMPACT. Many of the changes to the Internal Revenue Code in the INDIVIDUALS

WikiLeaks Document Release

The Effects of the Candidates Tax Plans on Households at Different Income Levels: Examples

2011 Tax Guide. What You Need to Know About the New Rules

Historical Effective Tax Rates, Preliminary Edition

An Overview of Recent Tax Reform Proposals

(See the accompanying two-sided fact sheet at

TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT. National Economic Council

Making the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Individual Income Tax Provisions Permanent

C H A P T E R 1 9 T H E E Q U I T Y I M P L I C A T I O N S O F T A X A T I O N : T A X I N C I D E N C E

Taxes and Gimmicks. Antony Davies Duquesne University.

Income Taxes and Tax Rates for Sample Families, 2006 Greg Leiserson. December 2006

FISCAL FACT No. 516 July, 2016 Director of Federal Projects Key Findings Embargoed

Clear thinking for a stronger Nebraska

Federal Tax Policy and the States

CHARTS MAY 10, 2018 WASHINGTON, D.C.

The Ryan Medicare Plan: Winners and Losers

Year-end Tax Planning Letter

H.R. 1 A bill to provide for reconciliation pursuant to titles II and V of the Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2018

DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF A CARBON TAX

Bank Tax Planning: A New Era of Taxation?

AN UPDATED ANALYSIS OF HILLARY CLINTON S TAX PROPOSALS

Key Elements of the U.S. Tax System

Modelling of the Federal Budget Personal Income Tax Measures

Comprehensive Tax Reform: Prospects and Challenges

There are several types of tax-favored retirement

Assessing the Impact of Tax Reform on Illustrative New Jersey Homeowners

Extension of Saving and Investment Incentives

Federal Tax Cuts in the Bush, Obama, and Trump Years

Bollenbacher and Associates Certified Public Accountants Taxpayer Relief Act

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) Tax Reform for Individuals. PREPARED BY Gary L. Riedlinger, CPA,PFS and Yeo & Yeo s Tax Services Group

100 West Fifth Street, Suite 1100 Tulsa, Oklahoma Federal Tax Alert. January 4, 2018

Rural America Benefits From Expanded Use of the Federal Tax Code for Income Support

Social Security and Medicare funding

HOUSE TAX REFORM PROPOSAL INDIVIDUALS

An Overview of the 2017 Tax Legislation: Impact to Individuals Prepared by PricewaterhouseCoopers and provided by Morgan Stanley Wealth Management

The New Tax Bill Winners and Losers

Credit Union Interests in H.R. 1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

District of Columbia. Summary of the Effects of Major Provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on District Residents and Businesses

Distributional Impacts of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

2. In 2003, the tax rates on dividends and capital gains were also lowered in a two-step phase.

Preliminary Details and Analysis of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

Take Advantage of 0% Rate on Investment Income

TAX POLICY CENTER BRIEFING BOOK. Background. Q. What are tax expenditures and how are they structured?

Transcription:

PRELIMINARY DISTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT TPC Staff November 6, 2017 The Tax Policy Center has produced preliminary distributional estimates of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act as introduced on November 3, 2017. We find the legislation would reduce taxes on average for all income groups in 2018 and most income groups in 2027. The largest cuts in terms of dollars and as a percentage of after-tax income would accrue to higher-income households. However, not all taxpayers would receive a tax cut under this proposal at least 12 percent of taxpayers would pay higher taxes under the proposal in 2018 and at least 28 percent of taxpayers would pay more in 2027. T he Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, introduced as H.R. 1 on November 2, 2017 and amended by Chairman Brady on November 3, 2017, proposes major changes to the individual and corporate income taxes, estate and gift taxes, and certain federal excise taxes. 1 The Tax Policy Center has produced preliminary distributional estimates of the legislation. We find the following: Taxes would fall for all income groups on average in 2018, increasing overall average after-tax income by 1.5 percent. The largest tax cuts would go to higher-income taxpayers. Overall, the tax cut would be smaller in 2027, because of the expiration of certain provisions in 2023 (including the new $300 family credit and 100 percent bonus depreciation), the effect of indexing tax parameters to a slower-growing measure of inflation, and the substitution of a child credit that is not indexed for inflation for personal exemptions that are indexed. Some taxpayers would pay more in taxes under the proposal. In 2018, slightly more than 12 percent of taxpayers would experience a tax increase relative to current law. That share would rise to slightly more than 28 percent in 2027. 1 This analysis is based on the Chairman s amendment in the nature of a substitute to H.R. 1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. A full description of the provisions contained in H.R. 1 is available at https://www.jct.gov/publications.html?func=startdown&id=5031. TAX POLICY CENTER URBAN INSTITUTE & BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 1

DISTRIBUTIONAL EFFECTS In 2018, taxes would be reduced by $1,100 on average, increasing after-tax incomes by 1.5 percent (figure 1 and table 1). Taxes would decline on average across all income groups, although higher income taxpayers would generally receive larger cuts on average and as a percentage of income. Taxpayers in the bottom two quintiles (those making less than about $48,000) would see modest tax cuts of between 0.3 and 0.5 percent of after-tax income (figure 1). Taxpayers in the middle income quintile (those making between about $48,000 and $86,000) would receive an average tax cut of $700 or 1.2 percent of after-tax income. Taxpayers in the top 1 percent (those making more than $730,000) would receive 22 percent of the total tax cut: an average cut of $37,000 or 2.5 percent of after-tax income. TAX POLICY CENTER URBAN INSTITUTE & BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 2

TABLE 1 Distribution of Federal Tax Change of the "Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" By expanded cash income percentile, 2018 a Expanded cash income percentile b Percent change in after-tax income c Share of total federal (dollars) Change (% points) tax rate d Under the proposal Lowest quintile 0.3 0.9-40 -0.2 3.9 Second quintile 0.5 3.0-150 -0.4 8.3 Middle quintile 1.2 12.2-700 -1.0 12.8 Fourth quintile 1.6 23.2-1,570-1.4 16.0 Top quintile 1.9 60.4-4,850-1.4 24.1 All 1.5 100.0-1,110-1.2 18.6 80-90 1.6 14.7-2,300-1.3 18.9 90-95 1.3 7.9-2,570-1.0 21.0 95-99 2.0 15.8-6,630-1.5 23.7 Top 1 percent 2.5 21.9-37,430-1.7 30.9 Top 0.1 percent 2.5 10.6-178,540-1.7 31.7 Notes: Number of Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) taxpayers (millions): Baseline: 5.2; Proposal: 0. (a) Calendar year. Baseline is current law. Proposal includes all provisions contained in the Chairman's amendment to H.R. 1 released on 11/3/2017. (b) Percentiles include both filing and non-filing units but excludes those that are dependents of other. Tax units with negative adjusted gross income are excluded from their respective income class but are included in the totals. The income percentile classes used in this table are based on the income distribution for the entire population and contain an equal number of people, not. The breaks are (in 2017 dollars): 20% $25,000; 40% $48,600; 60% $86,100; 80% $149,400; 90% $216,800; 95% $307,900; 99% $732,800; 99.9% $3,439,900. For a description of expanded cash income, see http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxmodel/income.cfm (c) After-tax income is expanded cash income less: individual income tax net of refundable credits; corporate income tax; payroll taxes (Social Security and Medicare); estate tax; and excise taxes. (d) tax (includes individual and corporate income tax, payroll taxes for Social Security and Medicare, the estate tax, and excise taxes) as a percentage of average expanded cash income. In 2027, the overall average tax cut would be smaller than in 2018, reducing taxes by $700 on average or 0.7 percent of after-tax income (table 2). Taxpayers in the bottom two quintiles of the income distribution (those making less than about $55,000) would see little change in their taxes, with average tax increases of $10 $20. Taxpayers in the middle of the income distribution would see a net tax cut on average and see their after-tax incomes increase by 0.4 percent. Taxpayers in the top 1 percent would receive nearly 50 percent of the total benefit; their after-tax income would increase by 2.2 percent on average. TAX POLICY CENTER URBAN INSTITUTE & BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 3

TABLE 2 Distribution of Federal Tax Change of the "Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" By expanded cash income percentile, 2027 a Expanded cash income percentile b Percent change in after-tax income c Share of total federal (dollars) Lowest quintile -0.1-0.3 10 0.0 4.4 Second quintile -0.0-0.6 20 0.0 8.9 Middle quintile 0.4 8.1-290 -0.3 13.5 Fourth quintile 0.6 16.2-710 -0.5 16.5 Top quintile 1.1 75.8-3,890-0.8 25.4 All 0.7 100.0-710 -0.6 19.6 80-90 0.3 5.8-570 -0.2 19.5 90-95 0.2 2.1-440 -0.1 21.8 95-99 1.2 19.5-5,230-0.9 24.6 Top 1 percent 2.2 48.4-52,780-1.5 32.0 Top 0.1 percent 2.6 25.7-278,350-1.8 32.1 Notes: Number of Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) taxpayers (millions): Baseline: 5.6; Proposal: 0. Change (% points) tax rate d (a) Calendar year. Baseline is current law. Proposal includes all provisions contained in the Chairman's amendment to H.R. 1 released on 11/3/2017. Under the proposal (b) Percentiles include both filing and non-filing units but excludes those that are dependents of other. Tax units with negative adjusted gross income are excluded from their respective income class but are included in the totals. The income percentile classes used in this table are based on the income distribution for the entire population and contain an equal number of people, not. The breaks are (in 2017 dollars): 20% $28,100; 40% $54,700; 60% $93,200; 80% $154,900; 90% $225,400; 95% $304,600; 99% $912,100; 99.9% $5,088,900. For a description of expanded cash income, see http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxmodel/income.cfm (c) After-tax income is expanded cash income less: individual income tax net of refundable credits; corporate income tax; payroll taxes (Social Security and Medicare); estate tax; and excise taxes. (d) tax (includes individual and corporate income tax, payroll taxes for Social Security and Medicare, the estate tax, and excise taxes) as a percentage of average expanded cash income. WINNERS AND LOSERS The impact of the proposal on individual taxpayers differs depending on their composition of income sources, demographic and family status, and other characteristics that affect eligibility for certain tax benefits. Our estimates of the number of taxpayers that would pay more tax or less tax than under current law exclude certain minor provisions for which it is difficult to assign the s to specific taxpayers. 2 Overall, the excluded provisions represent a net tax increase for all income groups in both 2018 and 2027, so we are overestimating the number of taxpayers that would see a tax cut and underestimating the number of taxpayers that would see a tax increase. In 2018, 70 percent of taxpayers would experience a tax cut from the included provisions averaging $2,000, and 12 percent would face an average tax increase of nearly $1,600 (table 3). The ratio of winners to losers varies considerably by income group, with the largest share of taxpayers with a tax increase in the second income quintile and in the top 1 percent of the income distribution. 2 We do include the average effect of these provisions by income group in tables 1 and 2, but their effects vary substantially within each group and we do not have the information necessary to assign the s to specific individuals. TAX POLICY CENTER URBAN INSTITUTE & BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 4

In 2027, 57 percent of taxpayers would see an average tax cut of $2,400, while nearly 28 percent of taxpayers would face an average tax increase of nearly $2,000 (table 4). The percentage of with a tax increase is similar across most income groups, although well below average for the bottom quintile (16 percent) and significantly above average for taxpayers between the 90th and 95th income percentiles (46 percent). Many higher-income taxpayers with a tax increase are affected by the loss of itemized deductions. Because the legislation substantially increases the standard deduction and repeals many itemized deductions including the deduction for state and local income and sales taxes the number of taxpayers who elect to itemize compared to current law would fall by 75 percent in 2018 (to 12.5 million ) and by 65 percent in 2027 (to 20 million tax units). TABLE 3 Tax Units with a Tax Change from Major Provisions of the "Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" By expanded cash income percentile, 2018 a Expanded cash income percentile b Tax units with tax cut or increase c With tax cut With tax increase tax cut tax increase All Provisions Major Provisions included here Lowest quintile 43.1-140 4.0 640-40 -40 Second quintile 69.8-420 19.0 690-150 -160 Middle quintile 81.7-1,100 16.8 1,010-700 -730 Fourth quintile 87.4-2,100 12.3 1,530-1,570-1,650 Top quintile 87.0-6,970 12.9 5,240-4,850-5,390 All 70.0-2,000 12.4 1,560-1,110-1,210 80-90 86.6-3,180 13.3 1,910-2,300-2,490 90-95 84.0-3,800 15.8 2,070-2,570-2,860 95-99 93.7-8,120 6.1 4,240-6,630-7,350 Top 1 percent 79.5-64,430 20.5 43,070-37,430-42,430 Top 0.1 percent 70.5-357,270 29.4 175,710-178,540-200,090 Notes: Number of Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) taxpayers (millions): Baseline: 5.2; Proposal: 0. (a) Calendar year. Baseline is current law. Proposal includes major provisions contained in the Chairman's amendment to H.R. 1 released on 11/3/2017. Due to data limitations, excludes the following provisions: repeal of credit for adoption expenses; repeal of deduction for moving expenses; limitation on exclusion of employee achievement awards and certain other fringe benefits; repeal of exclusion for qualified moving expense reimbursement; reduction in minimum age for allowable in-service distributions; small business accounting method reform and simplification; modifications to state and local bond interest (portion attributable to pass-through entities); and repeal of technical termination of partnerships. (b) Percentiles include both filing and non-filing units but excludes those that are dependents of other. Tax units with negative adjusted gross income are excluded from their respective income class but are included in the totals. The income percentile classes used in this table are based on the income distribution for the entire population and contain an equal number of people, not. The breaks are (in 2017 dollars): 20% $25,000; 40% $48,600; 60% $86,100; 80% $149,400; 90% $216,800; 95% $307,900; 99% $732,800; 99.9% $3,439,900. For a description of expanded cash income, see http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxmodel/income.cfm (c) Includes with a change in federal tax burden of $10 or more in absolute value. TAX POLICY CENTER URBAN INSTITUTE & BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 5

TABLE 4 Tax Units with a Tax Change from Major Provisions of the "Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" By expanded cash income percentile, 2027 a Expanded cash income percentile b Tax units with tax cut or increase c With tax cut With tax increase tax cut tax increase All Provisions Major Provisions included here Lowest quintile 39.2-110 16.1 310 10 10 Second quintile 56.6-360 30.8 690 20 10 Middle quintile 65.5-1,080 32.5 1,170-290 -330 Fourth quintile 71.0-1,940 28.6 2,080-710 -780 Top quintile 62.8-10,830 37.1 6,070-3,890-4,550 All 56.9-2,400 27.5 1,980-710 -820 80-90 62.6-2,920 37.3 2,880-570 -750 90-95 54.2-4,020 45.6 3,510-440 -580 95-99 73.3-10,490 26.7 6,450-5,230-5,970 Top 1 percent 66.4-123,240 33.6 61,770-52,780-61,080 Top 0.1 percent 69.2-583,640 30.8 298,020-278,350-312,110 Notes: Number of Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) taxpayers (millions): Baseline: 5.6; Proposal: 0. (a) Calendar year. Baseline is current law. Proposal includes major provisions contained in the Chairman's amendment to H.R. 1 released on 11/3/2017. Due to data limitations, excludes the following provisions: repeal of credit for adoption expenses; repeal of deduction for moving expenses; limitation on exclusion of employee achievement awards and certain other fringe benefits; repeal of exclusion for qualified moving expense reimbursement; reduction in minimum age for allowable in-service distributions; small business accounting method reform and simplification; modifications to state and local bond interest (portion attributable to pass-through entities); and repeal of technical termination of partnerships. (b) Percentiles include both filing and non-filing units but excludes those that are dependents of other. Tax units with negative adjusted gross income are excluded from their respective income class but are included in the totals. The income percentile classes used in this table are based on the income distribution for the entire population and contain an equal number of people, not. The breaks are (in 2017 dollars): 20% $28,100; 40% $54,700; 60% $93,200; 80% $154,900; 90% $225,400; 95% $304,600; 99% $912,100; 99.9% $5,088,900. For a description of expanded cash income, see http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxmodel/income.cfm (c) Includes with a change in federal tax burden of $10 or more in absolute value. The views expressed are those of the author/authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, the Brookings Institution, their trustees, or their funders. The Tax Policy Center is a joint venture of the Urban Institute and Brookings Institution. For more information, visit taxpolicycenter.org or e-mail info@taxpolicycenter.org. Copyright November 2017 Tax Policy Center. All rights reserved. Permission is granted for reproduction of this file, with attribution to the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. TAX POLICY CENTER URBAN INSTITUTE & BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 6