Health Care Reform UBA EMPLOYER OPINION SURVEY SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT

Similar documents
Percent of Employees Waiving Coverage 27.0% 30.6% 29.1% 23.4% 24.9%

Reference Point May 2015

AGM Survey Results NIRI NIRI 2010 Annual Conference Onsite Survey: Annual General Meetings

Insolvency Statistics in Canada. September 2015

Insolvency Statistics in Canada. April 2013

Nevada Commerce Tax Narrative. Prepared by Commerce Tax Division

FINANCIAL RATIOS OF CANADIAN COMPANIES July 26, 2012 Alberto Calva // Acus Consulting Ltd

US Economic Indicators: GDP By Industry

Deal Stats Transaction Survey

December Health Care Benchmarking Report

The Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program. Compiled by the Office of the Illinois State Treasurer Treasurer Michael W. Frerichs

Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation

GOAL 0: GDP GROWTH. By 2028, New Brunswick will experience an upward trend that returns its GDP growth rate to 2008 levels. Status: NOT PROGRESSING

CCAA Statistics in Canada. Third Quarter of 2017

Basics of Economic Data

Deal Stats Transaction Survey

Community Colleges of Spokane

2015 HEALTH PLANS BENCHMARK SUMMARY 2

Yukon Bureau of Statistics

Yukon Bureau of Statistics

Oxford County Labour Market Overview

Metropolitan Chicago Region Overview of the Economy

Average persons in household. Top three industries Post-secondary education (25 64 years) 7.1% Unemployment rate

SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

The Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on the Woodford County Economy

Rhode Island. A publication of the Labor Market Information Unit

FSB MEMBERSHIP PROFILE

Your Health Insurance Options under Health Care Reform

Michigan Economic Development Corporation

The Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on the Owsley County Economy

CHAPTER 6. The Economic Contribution of Hospitals

The Value of the Local Healthcare System on the Jefferson County Economy

2007AARPOnline SurveyofEmployers inflorida

The Value of the Local Healthcare System on the Harrison County Economy

The Value of the Local Healthcare System on the Lyon County Economy

Economic Impacts of the First 5 Placer Children & Families Commission s Funded Programs

EMPLOYEES UNDER LABOUR CONTRACT AND GROSS AVERAGE WAGES AND SALARIES, THIRD QUARTER OF 2017

NSBA 2017 SMALL BUSINESS TAXATION SURVEY NSBA 2018 SMALL BUSINESS TAXATION SURVEY

Businesses in Kentucky

2019 Australian Board Remuneration Survey Report

Michigan Economic Development Corporation

Economic Impact Analysis of Fort Steele National Heritage Town. Final Report. By:

Figure 1. Gross average wages and salaries by months

EMPLOYEES UNDER LABOUR CONTRACT AND GROSS AVERAGE WAGES AND SALARIES, FOURTH QUARTER OF 2016

Yukon Bureau of Statistics

Nonemployer Statistics An Indicator of Virginia s Gig Economy

County Economic Profile Sharkey County, Mississippi extension.msstate.edu/economic-profiles

County Economic Profile Oktibbeha County, Mississippi extension.msstate.edu/economic-profiles

Michigan Economic Development Corporation

County Health Economics Profile Oktibbeha County, Mississippi extension.msstate.edu/economic-profiles

Michigan Economic Development Corporation

County Health Economics Profile Marshall County, Mississippi extension.msstate.edu/economic-profiles

State & Local Tax Alert

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Tell us what you think. Provide feedback to help make American Community Survey data more useful for you.

Workforce Attraction

GEELONG REGIONAL CENTRE OVERVIEW

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Accommodation and Food Services Sector Profile for the Lake Charles RLMA

Preliminary Findings on Innovation District in San Diego

542 employers completed the EmployerOne Survey

2017 YEAR-END ECONOMIC REPORT SPONSORED BY

research Time Off and 8 06 Severance and Paid Change-in-Control

County Economic Profile Warren County, MS extension.msstate.edu/economic-profiles

The Economic. Impact of Veteran-Owned. Franchise. August 30, 2011

Investing in Canada s Future. Prosperity: An Economic Opportunity. for Canadian Industries

E APPENDIX METHODOLOGY FOR LAND USE PROJECTIONS IN THE BOSTON REGION INTRODUCTION

Economic Benefits of the Proposed Casa Diablo Geothermal Power Plant, Wahlstrom & Associates 2012

Planning for Health Care in Retirement

Public Accounts. Prince Edward Island. Volume I Consolidated Financial Statements. For the Year Ended March 31 st. of the province of

Mid - City Industrial

Texas Small Employer Health Insurance Survey Results: 2001 and Texas Department of Insurance

STATISTICS CANADA RELEASES 2016 GDP DATA

County Economic Profile Oktibbeha County, MS extension.msstate.edu/economic-profiles

2014 Annual Report to. The Governor s Workers Compensation Advisory Council. On The Workers Compensation System. October 5, 2015

Transcription:

Health Care Reform A summary of employer opinions on future costs, plan designs and impact of Health Care Reform provisions

About the Survey United Benefit Advisors, located in Indianapolis, has completed the data collection phase of the 2010 UBA Employer Opinion Survey. The final results are currently being reviewed and will be available in the full report scheduled for release in April 2010. In addition to the Survey s primary questions relating to the four main areas of Health Care Strategy, Health Benefits Philosophy and Opinion, Health Plan Management and Consumer Driven Health Care, the 2010 UBA Employer Opinion Survey includes a special timely supplement on current Health Care Reform issues being considered by both houses of Congress. The following is a compilation of the results of the supplemental questions on Health Care Reform completed by 1,510 employers of all size companies, industries and regions of the country. These results are likely highly representative of what employers believe should be included and excluded in whatever Health Care Reform legislation gets passed. The results are divided into two groups. The first group represents the issues employers felt they want, desire and/or support in any Health Care Reform legislation. The second part of this summary is a list of those items employers identified as being undesirable and should not be a consideration in the final Health Care Reform legislation. Also reported are the actual questions asked and the responses in their entirety. Survey Demographics Employee Size Groupings Over 1,000 5.3% 200-999 18.5% 50-199 33.8% Under 49 42.4% NAICS % Industry Category Groupings Range Responses Manufacturing Wholesale Trade - Retail Trade Professional / Scientific / Technical Services Health Care & Social Assistance 31-32-33 42-44-45 54 62 16.3% 7.4% 12.3% 12.3% Geographic Regions Finance & Insurance - Real Estate and Renting & Leasing Public Administration - Education Services - Utilities 52-53 22-61-92 11.6% 10.3% West 19.5% Central 17.3% North Central 24.0% South East 18.1% North East 21.2% Information - Arts / Entertainment / Recreation - Accommodation and Food Services Construction - Agriculture / Forestry / Fishing & Hunting - Mining / Oil & Gas Extraction - Transportation & Warehousing All Other Services (Management of Companies and Enterprises - Administration & Support and Waste Management & Remediation Services - Other Services) 51-71-72 11-21-23 48-49- 55-56-81 4.4% 11.8% 13.6%

Health Care Reform is an extremely important issue for employers of all sizes (and their employees), industries and geographic regions and they are anxious about the final outcomes. They are supportive of appropriate reform efforts that would provide coverage and financial protection to their employees while controlling costs, but are indicating they want whatever final legislation passed to be a positive result and not just a political gain for either party. Key Findings Employers want to be assured that their employees and their families have protection against the financial burdens caused as a result of having no or inadequate health care, pre-existing conditions and loss of coverage. Yet, at the same time, they do not support individual mandates for coverage with or without tax incentives/subsidies. Employers want their employees to become more personally responsible for their health and support mandated wellness programs and employee access to the information needed to make good decisions. Employers do not believe the current Health Care Reform effort will have a positive impact on health care costs. In fact, more than two-thirds stated they believe health care cost will continue rising, while only 8 percent anticipate any resulting savings. Employers generally support Health Care Reform efforts but have little faith the current effort will improve costs. They do not support taxation of benefits. Whatever ultimate program is passed, employers believe that all members of Congress must participate in whatever is passed. Employers Do Not Support A government-run program. Only one in three employers support a government-run program. Only 24.2 percent of employers support an exchange/co-op plan being provided by state or federal government. Mandated employer-provided health care with or without tax subsidies. Additional results relating to health care in general will be available in the 2010 UBA Employer Opinion Survey, which will be released in April 2010.

Of the potential changes listed below, please indicate which provisions you would support as an employer if there were to be included in a health care reform program: Immediate coverage for all new hires No pre-existing conditions limitations Community rating of all groups under 50 employees Mandated employer provided health care coverage for employees with a tax subsidy Mandated employer provided health care coverage for employees with out a tax subsidy Minimum prescribe level of benefits (i.e. maximum deductibles and out-of-pocket limits) Public funded option competing with private plans Co-op/Exchange plans provided through the Private Sector for small employers (<50) Co-op/Exchange plans provided by the Government (state or federal) for small employers (<50) Immediate mandate for coverage with tax penalties for nonparticipation Immediate mandate for coverage without tax penalties for non-participation Required wellness programs 21.1% 25.1% 15.2% 23.5% 15.1% 4.0% 38.3% 33.4% 16.3% 8.1% 2.4% 19.6% 28.9% 43.3% 5.7% 7.5% 19.3% 42.9% 17.7% 12.7% 2.6% 7.9% 41.8% 24.0% 23.7% 7.7% 33.3% 30.2% 18.4% 10.4% 11.5% 20.2% 30.2% 15.0% 23.1% 4.3% 3.0% 12.1% 32.9% 47.7% 7.4% 16.8% 45.3% 14.3% 16.2% 6.7% 15.4% 26.6% 25.2% 26.1% 2.6% 12.1% 33.3% 27.5% 24.6% 16.8% 37.4% 22.2% 14.5% 9.0% Mandated quality and price reporting by all medical providers (physicians, hospitals, and outpatient services) Taxing health care benefits above a minimum threshold 2.9% 29.1% 39.6% 21.3% 7.6% 26.0% 31.0% 32.6% 5.1% 4.8% Requiring Congress to participate in any mandated federal program/design Provide coverage for preretirement age employees via Medicare Requirement to provide Long Term Care coverage to employees/dependents 45.0% 19.3% 21.2% 7.5% 7.0% 7.6% 19.9% 42.9% 17.0% 12.6% 5.0% 14.8% 34.8% 25.2% 20.2% Definitely Would Support Likely Would Support Need to Know More Likely Would Not Support Definitely Would Not Support

Should a comprehensive Health Care Reform Bill be passed that included required minimum employer contributions beyond what you are currently contributing, what changes (if any) would you make to your plan(s)? Would inclusion of coverage/contribution mandates have an impact on any retirement programs you currently offer your employees? 3.0% 3.6% 43.2% 12.1% 41.7% Cancel my coverage completely Reduce coverage/ eligibility to match my current premium contributions Eliminate other coverage(s) (dental, vision, disability, etc.) to help offset the additional cost Increase contributions to the required level and make other changes to compensate Yes, we would likely terminate our current retirement plan(s) Yes, we would have to reduce contributions to our retirement plan(s) It would have no impact on our current retirement plan(s) There would be no impact as we do not offer any retirement plan(s) 26.3% 41.4% 28.7% Should a comprehensive Health Care Reform Bill be passed, what do you think will happen to the following costs over the next five years: 52.3% 49.7% 19.5% 20.9% 19.8% 22.1% 4.5% 2.9% 6.2% 2.2% Health Care Costs Hospital Costs 49.7% 47.5% 20.0% 22.3% 21.8% 20.2% 6.2% 1.8% 8.1% 2.4% Physician Costs Prescription Drug Costs Increase, but no more than present trends Increase at a much higher trend rate Increase but at a lesser trend rate Decrease a little Decrease substantially

About United Benefit Advisors This information is brought to you by your Member Firm of United Benefit Advisors, an alliance of more than 140 premier independent benefit advisory firms and one of the nation s five largest employee benefits advisory organizations. UBA Member Firms actively collaborate and share wisdom with busy employer benefit decision makers who want assurance that they are making informed choices in a complex and ever-changing marketplace. UBA Members serve nearly 40,000 private corporations and public employers across the U.S., Canada and the U.K. As trusted advisors, UBA Members help their clients manage $16.5 billion annually in employee benefit expenditures on behalf of 4.8 million employees and their families. About The UBA Surveys UBA also conducts an annual health plan survey that provides small to mid-sized employers with valuable benchmarking data that previously was only available to large corporations. With responses from 17,655 health plans sponsored by 12,316 employers nationwide, the UBA Health Plan Survey is by far the most comprehensive, validated survey of medical plan design and plan costs ever conducted. UBA also sponsors the Employer Benefits Perspective survey and the Employer Opinion survey through the joint effort of select UBA Member Firm clients and area employers. For more information, contact your local UBA Member Firm or visit www.ubabenefits.com to find a Member Firm near you. 2010 UBA Employer Opinion Survey Survey results, in whole or in any part, may not be reproduced, duplicated, stored in any information and/or retrieval system, transmitted, or distributed by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, FAX, scan, email or electronic delivery, without the prior written permission of United Benefit Advisors, LLC. Violations of copyright law are punishable by fines of up to $100,000 per violation. This report is published by United Benefit Advisors, LLC (UBA). All content is for informational purposes only and is not to be construed as a guarantee. For additional information regarding the survey, please contact: United Benefit Advisors, LLC Attn: Carmen LoCascio Manager, Surveys and Member Services 280 East 96th Street Suite 250 Indianapolis, IN 46240 (317) 705.1800 clocascio@ubabenefits.com United Benefit Advisors Shared Wisdom. Powerful Results. 3